Is not women decide? or rather, each woman? By what right a man can decide his ban? as rightists in the 70s? Is not that disgusting?

Whatever the opinions of others.

You still have to explain to young women that abortion is NOT a contraceptive. Abortion is a traumatic operation and should be practiced only as a last resort and especially without delay.

This is obviously not up to him. But see the case he dreams of being a father … but yes it does exist, it will try to persuade his girlfriend, we understand that. Once I do an abortion or abortion was a crime we were talking about abortionist … this time not so long ago and people still consider it a crime and would like to impose their beliefs on others .. Besides few services do hospitals and many are going abroad.

Precisely because they are men ………. And machismo still reigns almost by atavism! So it is for or against the woman who is master of his stomach and should remain in any case a man must decide for us! and those who are backward and cons are suffering from acute obscurantism! PS not that right-wingers of the 70s sorry! The MLF had its militant leftists v bcp as we say today "! PS2 and I'll remember it the right to vote that made the abortion law to free Ms. Veil and Giscard who tremendously supported! "I like that does not distort the facts or history

I think that man should not impose its decision. But the woman either. If the "father" wants to keep the child, is his right, and I find it disgusting on the part of the girl have an abortion anyway. Conversely, if the "mother" wants to keep her unborn child is just as disgusting on the part of man to force her to abort. It must be a mutual decision. Aty, be less aggressive, you might think you want to exclude men of any decision "because they are just men." Is ambiguous, be careful. Moreover, whether or not your point of view, we must consult the man and woman in this kind of decision. Now, ethically speaking, it is also a right. A man would not have the right to condemn this practice, but if a woman? If this man is disgusted by abortion, it is his opinion, point bar. Same thing for a woman. As is their right to believe in God or not. After, we must know the difference between defending his point of view, and impose his point of view …

really?? they do have the right to have an opinion on the pretext that they are men?? and can be put aside a certain Mary there is a little more than 2010 years to a woman is pregnant must be a man.

it is for the woman should return the decision to abort or not, anyway, the desire for children that are living in two. but ultimately that is the body of the woman and her child that it 's act. that is difficult enough in this question if we add more moral judgments that is hell.

in both cases the victim "is not conscious." but does that justify murder?

In the case of abortion you kill some cells if it is in early pregnancy in the case of an adult you kill a conscious person who has lived There is no mention of victim in the case of a person, fertilized ovum is not regarded as being a person

A fetus is an embryo, not a human being.

You really poses the question here? It's your best argument? The difference between an embryo and an adult? One is a been fully developed and autonomous. The other a small cluster of cells unable to survive outside the womb. One is already alive, the other not. One is a human being, the other not. Priestess @: I accept your argument ^^… I concluded that … Does it can still be semi-solid cannibalism?

1) Remove cells that are not even yet become a "person", and 2) kill "a human being" itself are two different things. In the first case, it allows the woman, who is free to do what she wants with her body and not be forced to have a dependent child if she does not feel ready or if n 'has the capacity (or even if she does not want, freedom requires a large number of possibilities). In the second, it is murder – because it is a human being born – and it will incur a prison sentence. I do not know how to explain it better. @ Sun Palestine: maybe you're upset for rape? It's weird as a principle, each his own eh. You're all well understood my words … I'll rephrase … you know many people who are scrambling to break / be raped? Rape is sexual intercourse involuntary victim (usually the woman) … if it results in a pregnancy, you must keep the poor victim the child of a psychotic monster? That we can understand ^ ^

The same as between oral sex and cannibalism.

That's 2 lives destroyed. The fetus is a living being called to life as a man or woman. the embryo is also a "living" in a human formation in the womb. Killing a person is unconscious, asleep, unconscious is murder in the same way that killing a conscious person. Do not compare abortion to murder someone who is already living outside the womb. An abortion is an abortion but it ends with a promise of life as a human being viable. You should better define what a "murder." In fact what do you really know your question so difficult?

An abortion is "murder of a man but not an embryo: an entity resembling a strawberry that has no independent life. A baby breathes, smiles, participates in its own way to human life. Second difference: The embryo is a part of the body of the mother. It's still up to her "his belly". Third difference: The mother is participating in a network of relationships and responsibilities far greater than that of the embryo. Her Life has a preponderance over that of the embryo. A death is a death but all the deaths were not the same psychological weight. An abortion is always a pain and trauma but obvious question is where is the "least evil ", the" least suffering ". The suffering of a woman who can not bear the idea of taking a child takes precedence over" souffreance (?) of an embryo.

the mother may abort the fetus if ONLY endangers her life or it would be premeditated murder. I like the philosophy of my neighbors above that justify abortion just to avoid liability to have a future baby to be conceived is jostling to become responsible and it sneaks! @ V For: Go! very good question you ask is, I admit that it is not easy to keep a baby after being raped, but I confess that do not know the view of my religion in such cases. Good question!

Human life must be respected whatever their stage of development from egg to the extreme age

earlier question .. I already answered you're a guy, leaves women a choice. the day your sister will break the day … or your wife will wait for a child with serious birth defect or disease rendering it non-viable …. will stop at the prudishness

abortion is a crime!

Frankly, you'd better not meddle with what you watch, and stop with all your "issues" anti-abortion that are used strictly for nothing .. wind is all that! legal abortion or not has always existed, and it's not that kind of talk to the jerk who will change anything .. Women are masters of their body, whether you like it or not, and the risk of disappointing you, there was no justification for anything! What do you think it's really the least of our worries …

It's terrible to see people speak of a living being growing at a phenomenal rate to become a child as a vulgar piece of gadget that is available as desired! Where is the will of the child in an abortion? Where is the right of the unborn child and live? Abortion not dispose of his body, have another one who can not pronounce. Of course it's terrible as a gesture for those women who went into action, it is with a heavy heart she did so, the fear directs, and this often causes irreparable injury! Frankly, it's time to ask if he had not been better for these women to keep the child rather than abort. I remind you that the deadline for abortion varies by country! Abortion is legal in two months in France 5 months in other countries. Have you ever seen the echoes and the child in the womb at 2,3,5,6 months? Well, in one case we are talking about children, and in another a gadget to remove annoying! It is completely. Have you ever seen the echoes and the child in the womb at 2,3,5,6 months? Well, in one case we are talking about children, and in another a gadget to remove annoying! It complètementhypocrite. Abortion is not a solution and millions of lives are suppressed for years under the pretext of freedom of women. I am a woman and it disgusts me to see such arguments! Abortion is source of problems, suffering, trauma, and made women believe that it will solve their problem. And precision: the abortions after rape are a tiny minority, it does not even represent 1%.

So if I understand correctly, you consider the embryo as a cluster of cells. But in this case, you are too! You too are composed of cells connected together, each having a specific role. The embryo also. You and him are not "clump of cells" but a living organism. I have thousands of arguments proving that life begins not at birth, but the encounter between an egg and sperm, that magic moment when the draft begins life: already, the child has his own agenda genetics. The body sends messages to prepare for this newcomer. Another argument, the dependence of this Peita man to his mother. But an infant is it not as dependent as he? And you, resist you naked without food in Antarctica? No. We all depend. And kill the weak is a crime, cowardice. MISUNDERSTOOD LIFE IS NOT A FORCE!

FUTILE remain …

you go to the Vatican office?

Quite agree )

I take serazette since I was 1 month before microvascular let serazette since I got my period in 1 month 2fois you find that c "knowing that breastfeeding is normal meci

No it's not normal but from the moment you know how all awry? It serves as a guinea pig.

Cerazette is a progestogen-only pill pure, ie without estrogen. It does not reproduce the normal ovarian cycle and more often accompanied by small erratic bleeding especially early in the decision. but often after a certain time, the rules become less abundant and sometimes there is more at all. In my opinion, because you just started you have the inconvenience, but it probably will not last.

Yes this is normal and your doctor should have let you know. AC is back to normal in the coming months, you have more rules (in my case with this pill and I do not trade !!!). Either you continue to have common rules and it will think of changing contraceptive

Agree with previous answers and are very reassuring and very superior in quality to those of C. .. believe themselves authorized to give a tone of morality: it is unbearable! I would add that breastfeeding itself is a causative factor in bleeding, but still good once it is neither unhealthy nor compromising on efficiency. There.

feeding a breastfeeding mom, you it plays on future tastes according to what your baby eats?

hello, I have no idea, because the milk does not taste what I eat!

Normally yes … That's why it is inadvisable to mother breastfeeding to eat peanuts and other nuts (so no MMs!). For this pass allergies baby …. Avoid cabbage and cauliflower also now to make more milk there are also tips: – Eat the lamb – Eat Quinoa – Drink a beer without alcohol a day – Drink herbal tea for breastfeeding (or sold in New Robinsons Naturalia). @ + Jules

q yes of course

my cousin wants to divorce his wife, but he finds that his wife had an abortion when they were together and wants to terminate it if he ever consider a divorce. I wonder if he faces jail if she told the judge asleep in ca judge can not be ignored. He aborted his wife (they were in a marriage) for her to continue school without problems. please reply

And then? or is the problem? one has the right to abortion and divorce in France ..

I have not experienced this situation but I think she also wanted an abortion if she will not get it do.

At first, his wife could have refused at that time .. Did she was forced under duress to abort? If yes .. then indeed he may be prosecuted (and it would be totally legitimate!) Note I'm talking about physical restraint .. Saying "If you miscarried not I leave you," is not a constraint. If he does not stress so it does not risk anything .. the fact of wanting to divorce now no difference.

Where do they live? If it is in France, she chose to abort herself and her husband was unable to oblige. It's legal, so it can not "condemn". But all this is very sad. I am against abortion, even if I do not judge women who are really forced to make that choice … For others, it has become a commonplace method of contraception. I find this criminal attitude …

ca how you look? their privacy?

Unless him put the knife to her throat, I do not see why anyone would accuse your friend of his wife's abortion …

@ Princess I totally understand your frustration of desire to become a mother, if you want I can give you a helping cock one hand there is nothing changing, I think … @恵美の女猫In any my questions, that you have just mentioned is the only one that really concerns me!

make him a nervous poo AC will be better!

Very funny !!!!!!!!!!!! You've got another way?

it can make a nervous system it will make the weight is pluss abortion

oh yeah that's your girlfriend? wind

I thought thee broke … http://fr.answers.yahoo.com/question/index; _ylt = AowPTPDlytmt_6r44yZ7Jgc5Agx.; _ylv = 3? Qid = 20100701141217AAcIKga Another big mythology. You have to be part of those people who like telling story. = D Anyway must be let go from time to time, is not it?

Make her laugh would break into Bide

Make him a violent coitus nervous! Abortion nervous would be ensured in this case.

calms the hag

A good bungee jump! it will give him ideas up!

well I'm not gonna spoil all your post with the non-existence of god I'm taking 2 points and I'll give you a star like this one does nothing must go …… ciao my shit

I do not know perhaps it is Tristant.

Who cares royally.

And he thinks that unwanted children and have a life of hell? Apologies from little, but I find that what is enacted as part of some religions (sex only to make babies) well it strangely similar to the livestock farmer … A dog does the same way, it will present its lists (female) standard, just at the right time and the sole purpose of having a scope (which it will sell not more, of course) … If we follow what is enacted in religious texts or "sayings" is quite the same, the sexual act must be done in intention to lay a child … The rest of the time it abstinence, usually for one or the other sex .. So it is a contradiction with the nature of man (I speak here both sexes of course) who has a libido other than that, it's feeling guilty for having god .. he is a breeder? and why is it raising human being?

It is a crime.

I'm for both ……

the death penalty must do with a judge who decides he is! for abortion should see your religion!

yes it all depends on your definition of "privacy" and "living"

I am against the death penalty in regard to abortion, it dépent The girl of 16 who wants to avoid a kid is understandable but in countries like India, where abortion is when one knows pregnant with a girl … is anything

Of course everyone's point of view, I'm for the death penalty (why let the murderers, psychopaths, rapists on this earth, spending money for their little care, will hop into the garbage) and l Abortion with condition (if it is because of some leg in the air that ends badly needed to think ahead, but if it is for parents who learn that their child might have birth defects, or a woman pregnant because of rape, the decision is theirs).

Yes, abortion if a pregnancy is not desired, but not for contraception ….. Both are social progress ….

I am against the death penalty. I'm for abortion.

There is no comparison between the two cases figure.Pour the death penalty, I think she needed parfois.L 'aussi.Moi abortion may be necessary, I am against all acts that not take into account the consequences potentielles.Ca does not mean that I do not commit any.

Mouny cuckoo, I'm against the death penalty and against abortion. In my opinion it can be forgiven if the mother had been raped.

… for abortion ouiiiiiiii.la death penalty, depending on the degree of the situation. the answer is just better and stronger in your interior!

For two, but in regard to abortion I am against its use as a means of contraception.

yes of course why?

Yes as it can be for the death penalty and against abortion!!

There are more than two years, I have resorted to abortion (thank you not to judge the polemics and above) with the medicine … I was told that I was about three mois.Cependant, j I was able to recognize the sex of the child when I lost it and I understood that three months could not see. Y'a t there any exceptions? or we would have lied in hospital, seeing as I did in any case keep the child? I have a little hard to understand as it is … you know the case of such exceptions or persons to whom it was believed they were pregnant for less than it was? If so, I do not want the doctor because I have not changed my mind .. only d like to understand .. Please let me speak clearly because it is far from me, I AC does not suffer has been carefully noname: it is I who have seen JOLAVA: abortion is allowed up to 3 months and a half years since qq … Regarding my reaction, ben j 'got so bad and I was so relieved that this is over I have. For my reaction, well I was so wrong and I was so relieved because it's over I had n'aipas reaction … only qq time after that I told myself qq there something that was not right .. also, the conditions which abortion is bad enough, so I was glad to return to the house on the spot … but hey that's another story @ jojopic: absolutely nothing you've actually understood

is not possible for a 3months sex is not well formed even though he saw he could never tell if if was a girl or a boy

You'll have to ask an expert to get a real answer I think. In any case I also have j had an abortion, I know it is not easy but now you don t have the only

abortion over 3 months are not allowed so I look after it will have you hidden ca by cons we do not see the sex of the fetus has 4 or 5 months by ultrasound before because it is certainly unclear, but in aborting individual life experiences they have seen a small button or not the result was very clear

Abortion is normally forbidden to 3 months. Because I got pregnant at 16 and after the results of the blood test was told I could not abort because I was already three months. Well anyway, I wanted to keep it then the problem arose. Now for the sex of the baby, I knew at 5 months. I do not judge you at all but I'd like how you reacted when he saw that. You're obviously not obliged to answer. Biz It seems indeed that the conditions are deplorable. A friend has been treated like shit by a nurse …. I tell everyone his choice! It is sometimes better to have resorted to abortion when they do not feel ready!

some of my friends knew the sex of their child to echo the 1st quarter, but logically you to abort you had to be less than that. I read somewhere that at first sex was almost identical and resembled than a girl. Only later if it's a boy what looks like the clit, grows to become the penis.

Well, the sex determination begins at the seventh week of embryonic life. But impossible to distinguish anything because changes take place inside the body (become promitifs channels, developing testes / ovaries). In general, it is unrealistic to see any difference before the 16th week, and even a trained specialist can recognize the penis. In short, it may be that you had seen an "artifact" misinterpreted. For the duration of development is particularly stable within a species, especially mammals, because no variation in temperature is one of the few factors that can accelerate embryonal development.

the time of abortion in France is 12 weeks after conception. For the rest, Ludo you've responded very well.

Me personally I'm against the abortion but some women are not vriment ki no real choice say too jai go bankrupt by cete but too late because jen has been 3 months pregnant and my cete jointly ki do not want this baby but jen wanted this baby so much and today I do not regret keeping laundry every day I feel it move in months and I just say ke c extra

my son was detected sex 12 weeks, the nursing staff has probably wanted to do for you No es no regrets in identifying the sex you could have probably in their t imagine the little boy or girl that would summer and you would have had more trouble getting your grief

If you have an abortion by drugs, and in France, I think you should be too early in pregnancy so we can distinguish the sex of the embryo. With drugs, the latest 7 weeks is recommended, after it works so well. But perhaps you were in a trial period? And you can just make believe that less is pregnant but the echo of the first quarter is infallible date a pregnancy, about 3 days (at that age all embryos have the same size, is that after 15 weeks of growth differences appear) .. There are probably doctors who agree to exceed the limit, but it must be a few days, and in these cases, certainly not by drugs. I think you thought he recognized the child's sex, but between a large clitoris and a small penis, the difference at this age is difficult to understand, even for a specialist, because as you l 'said above, the age limit, sex is not externalized

3 months it has banned an abortion by medication is mandatory intervention, there is something unclear to the inside. when certain sex doctor has seen the 1st echo so it's possible that you ' 've seen.

No no you have not seen her sex in three months c is not possible, you saw something you believe to be her sex and in any case it does have lied to the hospital, they have no reason not to do that

Regarding the sex of the baby, it is true that the 2 are similar at the beginning as uun clit stretched penis) is one reason why the doc does not want sex said before the 2nd echo … in my case For my first daughter, we did know that the last echo, because supposedly he had a doubt … that says it probably means there was nothing to see! (it was just came across a jerk who blew when he was asked if we could know the sex!) For my second, it has the second echo! (we had changed location!) And on abortion, j 've suffered when I was 17 years, it was through "aspiration", not by Medoc for pregnancy too advanced, it forestay useless to try a pill that could fail … Talor, I doubt that the deadlines have changed since then, but I think it's still a little suspicious that I just tried the tablet while you were at 3 months (that's about to here that I was …)

The sex of the baby is already visible about 2 ½ months because he already has all its organs and thus his genitals … And actually the echo of the 12 th week (the compulsory first trimester) it is already possible to see the sex of the baby, but you do not certify the to100% due to the confusion is obviously possible. So I think you very well could see her sex … what's even more difficult for you. But it's the same, you will never be 100% secure

I wonder pourkoi you ask this quest, puiske com tell you t'enfous to have an abortion. So?!

I do not think they left t'aient abortion even if it was too late for that would be dangerous for you. By cons may be that the date of conception was miscalculated.

hello, regarding abortion I did 2 times in 2 years on the c drive but once you prefer that to subject what they will not have this baby has it I think it is impossible to see sex of the child is 3 months pregnant I rather think that your doctor knows that you wanted an abortion willed as disgusted as most good hope you get better good luck for the future

abortion by medication does is up to 5 weeks of pregnancy is not even 2 months and if not done by suction. then I ask myself about the purpose of your question! info and I knew the sex of my baby 2months and half of pregnancy! Finally at the hospital they do not lie on the term of pregnancy "and finally know that abortion is allowed up to 14 weeks gestation or 14 weeks after first day of last menstrual period or 12 weeks of pregnancy that is not 3 months! then again I am very concerned over your question, what is your goal? discredit abortion and the hospital teams that practice?? to panic and women who want abortions?

I agree with jojopic! go see her profile, she has about rasto to death and homophobic so why not against abortion …

Related Blogs

• Labor Sec. Solis Says Women Will Have Access To Science And Health …
• Women As BreadWinners – An Issue? – NigeriansTalk
• Meal Ticket :: Blog Archive :: Philly's top culinary women Dish it …