In response to hope, I'm Halimatou Sahadia, a nurse who has nursed and raised the Prophet during his early years until the first purification of his heart. And you? Bella, bella, bella … I'm willing to pretend to believe you, but a challenge … is irrelevant to me. I'm not Arabic. That is the problem, you tend to ignore other Muslim ethnic strata. And when we fix on an individual because of his origin, sorry but I see only me of racism. Now your analysis is completely skewed by your hatred. Ok I'll give the French Arabs, young, are not necessarily angels. But to generalize with the Arab world. It is a matter of education. Education is not peculiar to any ethnic group but to the environment and society. The real issue is education FRENCH Arab-Muslim does it lead to behavior "uncivilized"? It is not always the fault of others. I think it would be good that you are questioning yourself.

There are more Muslim than the number you requested.

my name is Rachid which can be translated as "one who is mature enough to act always" is not my case I know, but that name, when written as it defined 'Arrachid "became the one of 99 names of God, Harun Arrachid, the great Abbasid caliph, it is also rated the name; @ Luqman ah, you're still in shock, sorry for you ^ ^

no mine!

I am an atheist, but I still bear the name of Luqman myth that never existed! But I think soon the change, the paperwork is very long ….. PS = To Maktub, you're so stupid as your parents would call you the "huileda" Rachid ….. @ Maktub, under the shock of what? The Mohammedans do not reach me, at least you anyway! I'll take a ride on your hard drives to see what you have really small in the noggin … trol as a Moslem fundamentalist who does not like you in the mosque (dirty gym) Friday c ' something fishy! If I find something not on your hard drives Islamic, I published here!

My name is a mystery word that nobody knows what is its meaning

I do not know "Jassem having had historical significance in Islam. I liked to wear the name of a companion or our beloved Muhammad (pbuh), even though I like my name.

I was named after the best of the woman who was chosen by God (swt): Maryam, the mother of Issa (3alihi salam) very beautiful name you have I do not know

Ultimately, your name not is not very pretty nor enviable … a heavy price to porter.le fanaticism.

I do not want to disclose this info on Yahoo Q / R, but my first name is that of a close companion of the prophet. tartatatata: So your name is Osama

Leila: I was named a cousin to my father

Treat others as racist Arab-Muslim allows not question their maladaptive behaviors and uncivilized. Whether you want to admit it or not, no matter where in the world where education is given arabomuslmane (Maghreb, Middle East, French suburbs), it always ends in fire and blood. At one time darling, must call into question …

My son is 5 months on I breastfeed from the beginning without complement or powdered milk, it was 2kg670 at birth and in fact 6 almost 7. My pediatrician told me to introduce the small pots to 6 months, it is possible to do this before? Or is he really expect her 6months? because initially it took 2 hours now it's all 3/4h night and often read that 5am I could still breastfeed while giving her baby food? how?

Poucinette, Know that introduces O NEVER EVER small pots in I do not even know what hole gaping her child! M'enfin! Come!

Hello Mrs, – In fact everything depends e corpulence your baby me I begin to 3 months with little pots and butter (mix

You can start by making him taste a little bit, kind gives him a crust of bread by watching anyway, and also a banana because babies love to nibble on what they have in hand …. I was in your case for my 2 children, I gave them the jars regularly for lunch the first 7 months and my daughter just aa 6 months and it starts to be regular … done little by little. and that does not stop to breastfeed, the head rest of the time it is his drink, the pti dej, its 4am, his evening meal and hug her. after it depends if you see that's enough or not. I nursed my son until 16 months, I simply followed its own pace (unless I forced to stop breastfeeding because I was pregnant with her little sis)

It depends on the baby. The pediatrician decided on a case by case basis according to reviews.

It is better to actually wait six months of the baby just to reduce the risk of food allergies. After I am not able to answer the second part of your question had not had the chance to breastfeed (Here baby 3 I hope I can!

We can start from 4 months old. Some say by the fruits of other vegetables by in doubt I introduced the two at the same time! Start with vegetables or fruit (depending on what you'll choose) only a few spoons. Avoid early mixes of fruit or vegetable to identify possible allergies. Always put the milk should remain the basis of their diet. Otherwise do as you feel is the best

hello Absolutely you can start to give him pots of fruit to begin with, begins with one fruit at a time, Two or three at tea spoon to start for two three days, then a single pot of vegetable vegetable has both two three spoonfuls before midday suck and you will see that as a measure and he will eat the entire pot!

if you look at the indications of the jars, you can start with some small jars of fruits and vegetables to 4 months but in general I think we need to trust the pediatrician, especially if your baby is growing well with milk. In my case I started with the fruit in my children before 6 months because I went every two and a relatively late with the rest because I saw that my milk was good for them. The oldest went to kindergarten at 5 months, then, it already ate vegetables moulines or vegetable broth with a little meat in it.

they say to wait 6 months for his digestive system is quite "ripe" to begin to digest food and the risk of allergies. but before we started earlier and well everything went very well. I have also started 6months these because I do not see the pediatrician before and I was afraid to start one, but finally, my pediatrician has told me so little that I could begin before! after compared with breastfeeding, I do not know, I could not breastfeed baby 3 months and supplementing with bibs because I did not have enough milk. passes a call to your pediatrician to ask if you can.

When we went, we introduce the jars as a child from a bottle. First of vegetables for lunch. well after you see how much pot your son eats. at first it may be two spoonfuls and basta or pot (my two girls were like that). and you complete the meal feeding. about the age of diversification, it is 6 months to reduce the risk of allergy. I know we are often pressed to discover new experiences to our children but eventually, it goes so fast, why hurry …

I started at 4 ½ months with a few tablespoons of vegetables and fruit, but tastes classics (apple, pear, carrot and spinach surprise that she loves). I had the agreement of the pediatrician because my daughter was not taking enough weight being exclusively breastfed …. I had to get my milk and add vegetables in his bottle at noon (right approach because it feels like a soup and ate it all) Now at 5 months and a half, she eats fruit as a snack 100G and 150G of vegetables around the twelve o'clock plus 4 bottles of 210ml and occasionally a small 150 ml of the rare times the night she wakes up. As you should start with small quantities, you can give him a few spoons just to taste before a feeding.

these men and women who seek, pretend to dictate to the world what to do, under the pretext that they are "experts" who are dedicated to their disciplines, have made experiments verify their theories, and that serious problems facing our planet! ! as if we could not manage his own crisis, thanks to men elected because "they have a bright smile and lots of money, as we've always done! c is really no matter what! they also invade our schools to divert our children the right path by teaching them that the earth is round, that man is an animal and making them learn the physical laws rather than divine! our children do not fear us anymore! we can not even whip them or leave them in the cellar for several days without the "experts" come to us and we take the threat of jail! c formerly was better when a child had the chance to spend special time with a priest, nobody complained, and the child learned life today is no longer respected the priests orcorporal punishment that they inflicted on our children, it's a world anyway! we must also accept abortion, contrary al divine love, rather than chasing the doctors or kill sinful adonnent sy! it is not too late to divert science …. Judgement Day is coming soon! Repentance! Repentance!

I'm all for science and spirituality.

I'm all for spirituality that does not exclude science

pros and cons at the same time!

I'm speechless ….. The land would not be round, the man would not be an animal (a plant then, or a mineral ?)…… "When a child had the chance to spend special time with a priest, nobody complained, and the child learned life" Yes, it made him much pain in the ass. "Judgement Day is coming soon! Repentance! Repentance!" It's been 2000 years that you expect the end of the world. So okay, we still have time … Do not worry about us. I vote for the best joke of the year.

for …… it does not contradict the Bible

You have to be stupid enough to put it that way! You stayed stuck in the middle ages?

Science is a tool to explain how creation. Spirituality explains the origin of creation. The two put together give a world view quite interesting:)

The trouble is that many scientists are also believers. This would be much easier if it was a bunch of pagans who spread such theories ungodly. They could be walled alive without scruple, but that's more difficult. The easiest way would be to use this science blasphemous one last time to cause the Last Judgement, they grow thanks to viruses and bombs they have invented. It would save the work to God and to their creator once these scientists would heretics less malignant.

Some do not understood your irony … By cons in the responses it's funny how some try to reassure themselves by adding that the Bible or spirituality does not contradict science … Well, if science contradicts all these fantasies, he must stop putting the tongs when we speak of religion: the supposed holy books are not of good moral: If you remove all that was borrowed from the Greek philosophers or Chinese, there is any foul thoughts of man: superiority of man on women, tolerance or regulation of slavery, incitement to murder or torture of those who think differently … it does no good to ignore it, things like that there are marked, and remarked in books. Religions, contrary to what implies the root word, do not collect peoples, but them away and make them fight each other. That ladies and gentlemen fundamentalists who did not like that we say these truths about your religion, go ahead with your thumbs down,. That ladies and gentlemen fundamentalists who did not like that we say these truths about your religion, go ahead with your thumbs down, if only for it to do you good, I am delighted

For Science was the twin of religion! she never had no longer be present in the West speak of God in scientific circles is really single out ….. This attitude has implications for all young minds who receive our university courses including A + Muslims

I agree with you my brother TDJ. As a very good indicator of Jehovah, I am well on the science-HAND! I would add, that it is primarily as a man close to me (and my imagination and my stupidity) I answered: against science. No, but look at what led us to the science! _ Knowledge _ The standard of living improve freedom _ _ _ Respect The development … No, but there are at least a single thing good for our God (glory to him)? Unfortunately for him: no. Pfff, science is the excrement of Satanta, because it's not good for our trooooop sect! I'm totally with you 200% my brother! As I assume that if you do not try you can not know (eg if you do not skydive without a parachute, you do not know what that mean and what it will do!) Land n is not necessarily round, because when I dig in my garden I fall on the Chinese, but the Sewer … And everyone knows that the essence of man is. And everyone knows that the man's own c'estd'être an inbred: So Adam and Eve are our single parent! And not forgetting that girl who made it violently raped by a mad absolutely must keep the child from mad if she does not suffer eternally in hell for not pretend to have to kill a cell that amat one is humorously as a child may be able to believe after our scams … heuu our beliefs! (By cons, to paradise … if you could give me your place … not because as I am a loyal feeling, I'm not about to have my ticket from the 144 000 …) And you know how to make people believe that science is wrong? _ You conflates "intent and knowledge" from the use of science and "usefulness" of science! You see, if people are stupid, they will fall into the trap, and we will follow it, ha ha ha!

I do not know which way to pray to, or we tits us?

I think she's a woman!

as "worse"!

It is often said that nursing women should not have unprotected intercourse because the partner's sperm to spoil the milk or that it should not suck the breasts of the mother, is it true

I rather think that is the fat content! Condom-if: whole milk, if not condom: skimmed milk, if both semi-skimmed milk bah .. In fact, you're in the other questions like … it is a treat at the coffee break!

No real physical influence. The only obstacle – psychological – could be the desire or the representation we have of the breastfeeding woman. Read the conclusion of this article http://laval.nourri-source.org/nourri_source_org/allaitement/allaitement-et-sexualite-incidents-de-frontiere

not

"On" is often said bullshit

No, no influence on breast milk, the fact that the husband should suck the breasts of the mother is by this that the breast milk is full and there is drinking milk.

I'll live, it makes me a little scared .. Is there a fee? For ceu are cons before me "insult", know that I am cons but there are also some situations where it is better to do instead of making a child ke unfortunately without Dad. Yes I know there are things to avoid getting there, I have no ECU but please do not judge me. Thank you.

it goes bad for the fetus, unfortunately.

So it does not pay but you pay a fee to the hospital and i you are a minor you have to be accompanied by an adult but you do not pay taxes or not the transaction I wish you luck for the following

It's stupid to be against something and do it anyway. But it's even more to denigrate someone who performs an abortion when it is right (and increasingly it is better than a child that abortion does not really want or we will raise under poor conditions). Brief. I give you the website of Planned Parenthood, which will explain everything: http://www.planning-familial.org/themes/theme03-avortement/index.php

To explain how it happens, we should know what you'll experience: a medical abortion or curettage. These are two very different methods.

it all depends on the pregnancy I am afraid to live it too, because in certain situations deserve better than to suffer or even give birth to a being who will not be unhappy or everything he needs … in short .. Swiss in his six days up to 6 can have an abortion by medication, it takes 3 pills and two days after it returns to take one last pill and remain under observation until the expulsion! curettage and I am sorry not much information! courage at least for this event!

it depends, drug or medical?

the fact you're too easy. you say be against abortion even when you are concern. if you really cons alor no exception for you

well

It happens to be murder, it means that your whole life you do not deliver thee, if you do not want your baby you can possibly give to another person who can not have, its hard because you will regret not to know but at least it will survive and who knows maybe he will become successful adults and thank the stranger who gave him the gift of life … certainly in both cases you ' will not take your act, but know that the excuses for not having a father these days it's more an excuse for children have been created with the sperm bank and another lost their early …

because there has yet to be against abortion? woe ..

But I do not because even if humans for abortion is nothing before God and the people concerned will have to answer for murder. The world is completely ASSHOLE. I would like to respond a little to all these messages because I can not answer each individually, however I will like! Do not confuse everything there are millions of abortions each year worldwide for a yes or a no girls that have abortions! regarding orphan diseases by severity I think it's a matter of conscience (but a tiny percentage of all those abortions). Yes as long as the egg is fertilized it becomes a life on its own, for evidence in the Bible under the Mosaic law a person who "bumped" a pregnant woman and the baby if she lost the person who had bumped die was because it was a life for a life. It is God who made these laws which proves that even an embryo in any hour is a living thing in itself. Genetic code are already registered,. Genetic code are already registered, the color of her eyes, her hair, which he resembled his father or his mother, etc. …

You are against abortion is but what do you think of contraception? And sex education? Because for me the best weapon to bring down the number of abortions is better access to contraception and sex education for girls and boys. What do you think?

An embryo is not a baby, simply. And your god should answer for the murder of all children born dead, all miscarriages and babies u lost to accidents as we are! I also assign to the course for the Tsunami in Southeast Asia: 300,000 dead and for the storm in New Orleans! He better have a fucking god your lawyer! @ Dding: ha! That's it! I'm pissed! if so … So for you, the ultimate proof that biblical interpretation!? Ah bravo level of thinking. If you accidentally pushes a woman and she loses her baby must be killed! That is just divine justice for you right? Well let me tell you that your justice craind a max and I am very glad that our society does not enforce it. Your bible also justified slavery I remind you, do I conclude that you disapprove strongly the abolition of slavery? I would love to see you defend this abmination quoting the Bible, it would make me laugh! An embryo is not a living being,. Your bible also justified slavery I remind you, do I conclude that you disapprove strongly the abolition of slavery? I would love to see you defend this abmination quoting the Bible, it would make me laugh! An embryo is not a living being is just a cluster of cells. A living being has a minimum of autonomy, the embryo: 0. As mentioned in religious texts for "evidence", I recall that the Egis authorized the killing of up to 4 months pregnant, because she regarded the baby as not living up to four months. So, reversals jackets when it suits you …

A fetus is not a baby. No more than a sperm … When you dump the puree, 40 million sperm on average, what is it then, genocide?

If you had worked in psychiatry and as I saw this live as babies from birth you would have perhaps a different perception. All those who make an abortion is a déchirrement for them, do not forget that in time the women brushed against death for abortion but is it better to keep a child who does not and who will be unhappy all his life? What is regrettable is that in China where they can have only one child and India, where dowry is compulsory for a girl to marry is about making abortions as well as infanticide of girls.

this terrible case of conscience must no longer be present on the table. science has put at the service of humanity. each person who is sexually active must take its responsibility and protect women and men. préservatifs.vasectomie, pills, ect many choices. for unconscious? 's tans the worse for them.

a question. if you learn one day that your future child's disease harlequin http://www.google.com/images?hl=fr&safe=off&q=harlequin% 20ictiosis & um = 1 & ie = UTF-8 & source = & sa = N og & tab = wi & biw = 1280 & bih = 805 or any shit like this is horrible. what will you do? thou shalt have the courage or the nerve I know not to give birth to a sensitive human being with a functioning nervous system allows him to feel pain, knowing full well that all his life (he died pTet immediately , maybe in 10 or 40 years) will only PURE PAIN every gesture he will do. whenever it will even bend the arm, his skin will tear. it will likely end up like him http://images.encyclopediadramatica.com/images/b/bd/Partyman.jpg because that's what you have as a child. a living being who suffers Constantly. knowing that if the early months of pregnancy you have the hypocrisy to tell me that you will ensure that it is happy until his death, forgive me insult you but you're really a big. knowing that if the early months of pregnancy you have the hypocrisy to tell me that you will ensure that it is happy until his death, forgive me insult you but you're really a grosconnard. it comes from the heart, forgiveness. because it will never change the fact that he will suffer permanent and it will grow so very weird. and I sincerely hope that these images shocked thee! because it gets worse as orphan disease detectable from pregnancy. Today in 2011 the technology allows us to ensure that people can be born happy or die happy. unfortunately perverse religious concepts like the soul ect, not only hamper scientific progress, but also did nothing to fuck man (who is the first question I think)! it's so easy to invoke God to justify the suffering of others! kind with euthanasia. when you have a patient who wishes to have shortened his suffering, the doctor agrees, but you always relatives, religion crap with any erroneous concepts of Good and Evil and without empathy (the ability to put themselves in the shoes of someone else and ask if we would like that), who say no because only

http://www.mariereine.com/affiche.php3?ID=590&categorie=6

If they were men who had had birth, abortion was never a crime. I agree it is an evil, but a lesser evil!

There are actually tens of millions of abortions worldwide each year. This practice homicide is considered "normal" for the simple reason that there is a general hardening of human consciousness: "However, the inspired word clearly says that in times to come some will abandon the faith, paying attention to misleading inspired utterances and teachings of demons, 2 by the hypocrisy of men who tell lies, as being branded in their consciousness "(Timothy 4:1,2. Bible).

Hello! Life begins at fertilization. thus aborted a child is a life interrupted. Humans are not allowed to interrupt an innocent life. Deliberately cause an abortion by artificial means, by the use of drugs or a medical operation for the sole purpose of avoiding unwanted childbirth is a painful act for the woman both mentally and physically. It is even more violent for children as it does not survive. Life is a precious gift, it is sacred. A 2004 study among 331 Russians and 217 American women who had abortions found that in each half of the women subsequently experienced an unpleasant feeling, almost 50% of Russians and 80% of Americans felt 'guilty', and over 60% of Americans' do not forgive. " They are frequently subjected to pressure. Parents, spouse or well-meaning friends saying, "Of two evils one must choose the lesser" argument. Parents, spouse or well-meaning friends saying, "Of two evils one must choose the lesser" argument quipeut lead to a hasty decision and poorly lit. "But," says Priscilla Coleman, a specialist risk of abortion for mental health, once the stress of decision making and the abortion took place, the cognitive abilities of women returning to normal and deep guilt, sadness and regret settled. "Regret is usually around the question of abortion he put an end to what was already a life? According to the report of a study group on abortion (South Dakota), many women considering abortion "were misled: they believed that not take away anything other than cluster of cells'. If they had been told the truth, they would not abort. "After a summary of the" surprising and heartbreaking testimony "from 1940 women who had abortions, the study concluded:" The grief of losing a child, they were told, did not exist for many causes of anger . ". "Moreover," the psychological harm caused to a woman who knows she killed her child is often devastating. " A 2006 study focused on the lives of many women, adolescent girls were pregnant. Half of them had kept the child and the other half had failed. The study found that "the odds of receiving therapy, have problems sleeping and smoking marijuana were lower in cases of childbirth than in abortion cases." – Journal of Youth and Adolescence. Another report provided "the results of four studies of the most advanced worldwide. What we learned? That "the rate of psychological problems are higher among women who had abortions than among those who kept their child. "- Report of the Task Force on Abortion, South Dakota, 2005 In the end, everyone is free, but there are consequences in every decision: caring for a child when we are. "- Report of the Task Force on Abortion, South Dakota, 2005 In the end, everyone is free, but there are consequences in every decision: caring for a child when we estadolescent, or kill her child. The best thing is to have physical relationships when one is married couple, able to accommodate a child. Because we must not forget that the relations of this type are basically an expression of love that two people are doing, but also and above all a means to procreate. The solution is to teach young people that intimate relationships are sacred and they should not be taken lightly because they can give life to a person whom will be responsible. Good day!

The choice of abortion is primarily the woman and not a God who probably does not exist.

there was slaughter in the South and North Kivu, Congo Roayume. Several deaths on Sudan "Somalia" War in Congo Brazzaville, More deaths in the Republic of Côte d'Ivoire, several deaths in Angola almost everywhere in Africa rien.Plusieurs coup. It is the union boss who Euroépenne Africa, and did not intervene. Understand that we are called to repentance and conversion to head narmale of life that is happy and eternal in Jesus Christ, the Prince of Life. Do not judge, said, Jesus of Nazareth. We want to create new rules of good political governance, economic and financial planet because justice is a people growing up, but the sin is the shame of a nation. When life goes from bad to worse, we must have recourse to Jesus of Nazareth "God from true God who created us. Marriage does not like to be faillite.il secuiriser social life of the people, police and military basis of each country's national economonie the planet.

not me because I was looking for a baby for 20 years

looks like this instead: it happened a month ago and already 22 million hits! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXh7JR9oKVE&feature=player_embedded #! Happy Holidays

I will respond the same way I did it to another question on abortion. For those who do not want to admit the horror of abortion, to learn more: There are a lot of sites on the Internet where you can see the sad truth. Where you can see ultrasound pictures of fetus week by week, and also photos / videos of actual abortions that are unbearable for me. So do not forget the obvious! A fetus at 12 weeks it already looks like a tiny human being, and in some countries abortion is allowed up to 24 weeks or more! The fetus is a living and he suffers. Especially when we know the ways of all abortions that are really horrible. Some babies (especially those in some cases removed by caesarean section) did not die during the abortion, but after this one, yes it sometimes happens that they are still alive and dying after abortion. It's HORRIBLE. Some people should be more responsible. Some people should be more responsablequand the pill and forget … For children who will be born ill-formed, it is true that it's delicate dilemma understandable, or to children born of rape may be understand that it is psychologically hard for a woman to live. You can see things from different angles, but for my part, I am against abortion. Especially since most are of a forgotten pill, or other irresponsible.

the world has no morals!

Hello everyone! Ive had an abortion in November 2009 I became pregnant again in December 2009 I gave birth 28 September 2010 but it turns out that my baby died 10 days after its naissance.Maintenant I want to design another because- this-I have a mad desire to regain maman.Je wonder if it's good for my health or pas.Je tell myself that my pa did UTURE reposé.Aidez me please. Abortion occurred naturellement.Nous want children my husband and I

next time you will avoid abortion, it will avoid you might give birth to stillborn babies … Needless to emphasize not?

you have aborted for medical reasons? or was it because you do not want a child at that time?

Courage in these difficult ordeals. You have no problem giving birth, you are very fertile. You are young and certainly the ideal, which you find a perfect physical and mental health before considering pregnancy now. Because nothing is running, you must leave on time. Your health is really paramount. If you granting you another two months before another pregnancy, surely you'd better back. I guess you're subject to be taken with vitamins or tonics to fully recover. Courage you and your husband and deeply, schedule a pregnancy to the end of the first quarter of the new year for delivery in December, and it would be a nice Christmas present for you. With all my support!

I want a drug intervention for abortion thank you for understanding

ha religion is not made against wean the child

One year is a little late for an abortion …. and at this stage it's more an abortion ….

Ben will see the doctor or the hospital! But beware it's your first woman to try not to abort you!!

louzingo just invented the IVC: voluntary termination of brain

Trying to understand: Madame is pregnant, she already has (finally you have) a child a year and she would like the abortion pill, well, if it is not more than 7 weeks since you made pregnant, go see the gynecologist chu nearest you, she must be careful accompagnée.La next time please.

Kitty, bravo for your understanding, no irony.

I personally am not against abortion but it is a bit trivialized and show the truth to the students is a step towards allowing a lucid awareness and knowledge about the thing. Abortion is killing a living being, do not take it lightly!

Because he did not want to indoctrinate students with his own ideas.

videos shown to students must be shocking! and hurt the sensibilities of some students! despite that these videos will reveal a strict truth he did not intend to disclose it without authorization from his superiors! hello everyone!