But Why Do All These Infanticide On The Part Of Mothers?
Friday, December 18th, 2009But why do all these infanticide from moms? Infanticide infants but also killing of very young children died from abuse and that this has happened in the North. A baby has been found decomposed in a basket Lingerie Meurthe et Moselle (his sister was found frozen in 2007). The little bodies are often frozen. There was the case Courjault and three babies frozen, frozen baby near Guingamp, another in Switzerland earlier this year, another in May in Metz … and others. Infanticide recur, often perpetrated by women only, but also in couples where the spouse does not always seem complicit. But what happens there in the heads of these women? How spouses can they not know the status of their spouse or companion? Yet contraceptive methods exist and are widely disseminated; abortion is commonly practiced, so it was provided exceptional law is now
Parallel dishonest enough between abortion and infanticide, I think this issue stinks RELANS the backward-looking pro-life do-gooders. Abortion is a right, it displeases or not calling some suckers act comfortable. When to involve death, anyone not born and did not live, I do not see how it is a death before they have lived. (This is only my opinion of thinking that) When it falls to the infanticide of psychiatry, with a wide spectrum of reasons and explanations for that opinion consists of poor nobodies with narrow minds can probably not even conceive.
infanticide is a fairly marginal phenomenon, the problem is that the media bombard us with it, and suddenly, we feel there are more and more. It can be so many reasons that it is impossible to describe them all here, it may be a psychiatric illness, but also denial of pregnancy, etc etc … Then say that abortion is a "comfort" is just shameful, it is part of human core of a woman. Strangely, there are only men who think it is something of comfort, not women, strange, strange …. in short, was not the debate.
Infanticide has always existed. The media coverage because it fascinates the crowds, that's all.
Frankly said, I is justice that shocks me even today we learn that Valerie Goller who gave birth alone in the woods and killed her newborn was acquitted! All this because she was a denial of pregnancy! But damn it does not excuse everything, even when she killed an innocent human being who did not ask anyone! I find it unacceptable that we excuse mothers and infanticide! She should be condemned! It is an act even more heinous because it is her own child. And do not tell me she was not aware of his act, she did not know she was pregnant … Ok Ok I can understand but once she saw the baby she could not be confused with a cat NOT?! It was therefore well known that she killed a human being and it does not Foute our mouths this con **** and say she will be – being with other children … Justice expected him tubal ligation! When I think many women want a child and that it has just killed ….. Incomprehensible and unacceptable. I can understand they do not want his child when he was assigned to the DDASS, it is left in a church, abortion, birth is in X or taking contraceptives …. but not TEU not !!!!!! Really is inexcusable and I hope I never meet a mother infanticide because I would make him suffer the same thing she did to her own child …..
The problem with infanticide and denial of pregnancy is just what comes out of the womb is not considered a child. Even if I do not understand the death of a child, I understand the frightening it can be seen "something" out of her with excruciating pain. I think it's a little pain and fear similar when one is broken and we saw his chair or his bones that is alive or dismembered. But I think in this case can not a parallel with abortion at that time. Yes, abortion has become so commonplace that people no longer say that abortion of a child but a cluster of cells that had nothing human. After the pros and cons might be debatable. @ Phrase Chrysa bothers me a little when she said: "any person not born and did not live, I do not see how this one died before even to have lived. "How does a pregnancy could result if the embryo or fetus had no vital functions? It sure is not living in the environment. How can a pregnancy could result if the embryo or fetus had no vital functions? It sure is not living in the environment quenous connaissont now but it's still life if there stagnation and inertia and decay. Life may not begin before birth if there no life and that is scientific. Everything is organic and is not viable if it breaks it evolves and develops. It is certain that that abortion of a cell is less difficult than to say that abortion of a baby .
I quite agree with you, I who gave birth to a child (stillborn), 17 years ago, and who wants a big family, I have so much love to give, I have three children, and desires of another, but life decided otherwise it is 6 years, I can not fall pregnant, I've been ok, but when I think of all those who have no trouble getting pregnant, had a great pregnancy (mine were all abnormal), gives birth alone, sometimes without evil and dares to kill a child, or even those who deliberately kill, and pose mad, should not exist, yes I am for the death penalty without appeal
why yes