(Ames Hearted): For Or Against Abortion, Should He Be Dumb To Skip This Video?
Friday, November 26th, 2010Unbearable images, meant to illustrate the different techniques of abortion of fetuses showing, sometimes disjointed, that's what the second high school students accepted to repeat, in Manosque, were forced to look at a civics Legal and social. "Me, I left the room, with two of my comrades, but the others stayed until the end, stunned," said Maxime, a student in the class. "It was not the first year that this professor of history and geography that put pro-life film program continues, and I had agreed in advance with my parents to leave if he ever began again, "says the teenager. The incident occurred in mid-October and revealed by La Provence on Wednesday, was immediately reported to the Academy of Alpes-de-Haute-Provence by the head of the institution, and by a letter from parents. The local authority in the Federation of Parent (CIPF), Annie Mouthier, also intervened. A survey. A enquêteadministrative has been initiated, leading to a Nov. 8 inspection teacher, experienced teacher, aged about forty years. Meanwhile, a helpline and dialogue has been established in the institution http://espanol.video.yahoo.com/watch/2910486/8340073
Unbearable images? No more than some films or videos that kids watch on the net!
ohhh awful, so I'm against it, except when necessary, but good bugs, I'll still get burned by the racist gang nickname! those who have not watched the images are unacceptable The video lasts about 5 minutes, I mm not see a minute of the video …
Cons of course! @ I do not open the video, I'm a sensitive soul lol
Thank you for this video. You just do the same thing this professor contacting us. There are 14-years on QR. So one to two years younger than his class. So, knowing your beautiful mind, I see this teacher as a courageous and intelligent man. A man of principle who took the risk of going against the current official thinking and that could pay dearly. It is true that this may offend the soul of a teenager, but at their age, the question of abortion may arise. It's good to know. If they are too sensitive to see the reality facing two years of manhood, is that our education prepares them difficult to grasp the reality head on. And then what, you've seen Alien? The Exorcist? It's worse. And they love it. Suffice to say things clearly, abortion is murder of innocent inconvenient. Not a technique of contraception. @ Little Pixie: that this is not propaganda but the truth. Personally, this is the propaganda of pro-abortion killers that I find offensive.
yeah, in France it is 200,000 deaths per year with that, but nobody talks about. and then we'll tell you that the country is aging naturally, they kill their kids! Thank you, Ms. Weill.
When Planned Parenthood comes to pro-abortion propaganda no problem, but when it shows the reality of abortion, everybody plays the virgins. Kudos to this teacher
I do not know … it reminds me that abortion is not a trivial matter.
It's less cruel to watch a war movie than to make, right? I have not watched yet (sensitive soul) do not need to dissuade me.
Except that until proven otherwise, that is for or against abortion is a right. I'm not saying it should be used as a means of contraception, but the woman still has the right to dispose of her body as she sees fit … This video is so pro-life propaganda liberties. Disseminating this kind of video for high school students was therefore not appropriate. One can be against abortion, but we let people make their own choices and make their own decisions.
yes
It's great no matter what this video is pure disinformation. Nothing to do with abortion. (Aspiration) I hope this teacher will be severely punished.
Hmm …. Regardless of whether one is against abortion or pro-choice (I say with "to" because nobody is really "for" abortion), the least we can do for this teacher clearly invested with feeling a mission of information and prevention, in itself allow me not to criticize, would have been to avoid showing his class videos lying … because, what I see in this video? fetuses allegedly from abortion, but it is easy to see that these malformed fetuses (and already well developed), apparently died of natural in utero (fetal miscarriage from nearby the term) or premature babies stillborn … in all cases no embryos younger than 12 weeks. It does make it less painful and dramatic abortion? No, surely not. But at least if there must be information, whether disseminated in an objective, concrete, realistic and non-deceptive. Here, the only purpose is clearly to shock and. Here, the only purpose is clearly to shock and not feel guilty. Far be it from me to remove the pro-life, but I think the arguments they use to deter potential "candidates" to abortion are not the good.
it is neither more nor less than crap, an offense and psychological violence exerted on the person of minors 15 years as part of their school activity I guess the teacher was in her own right when He accomplished this feat of terrorizing her students by spreading this video emphatic and misleading because, although the problem is not there, it is obvious that fetuses exhibited are the result of therapeutic abortion and that their morphology is not to do with that of fetuses of 8 to 10 weeks (the average time in which the acts of orthogenics are made in France) so this is propaganda (I assume also that it has reserved, Like others, the right to cut the card most of his argument by claiming that they had made it clear images of the Holocaust educational purposes, that is what I have already had occasion to read this) except that here it comes comply minds against Republican legislation which grants women the right to dispose of oneself and one is in theline of a dogma that denies him and who opposes the same way we would not accept a teacher to hold a public teaching hour on the harms of eating pork, or the indecency to show her hair when one is female and not necessarily advocating the niqab and the burqa in the name of public morals or self respect: it's the same thing and worse it could have spread under the same intentions, images that show the devastation caused monstrous before 1975 by clandestine abortions performed on women who could not afford to use a foreign doctor, but that is not the issue .. c ' is simply outrageous