when Christians who have these values, which respect the most values of the church: gay marriage ban no abortions no no global world order ect. @ Father sifleur but concern for foreign aid, the poor, the destitute, rejection, are Christian values, and left!

hummm I think the extreme right … BOUTIN girlfriend or whatever is found.

Christians vote right or extreme right.

Yes, far-right Christian Democratic Party or Christine Boutin. @ Whistler Father is adamant again, but there are Christians on the left as there are Christians on the right.

the FN and the MPF.

((((((( NO ONCE IN POWER THEY HOLD their promises !!!)))))) PARTY FOR ME I VOTE FOR CONS!

Simulation of a victory FN: A few million immigrants in less and it is dramatic. Immigration puts pressure on wages: why a boss he would increase the salary of a French if the immigrant takes what he finds? Trichet said recently, raising wages would be the worst thing to do in this period fragile post-crisis, we must control our costs of production: do not raise wages and hire Mohammedans. A devaluation of 20 to 25% of our currency to boost exports and it is dramatic. In the unlikely event that our trading partners do not say anything when you flood their domestic markets with cheaper Made in France since devalued, our imports will no matter what price increase 20% to 25% and therefore our production costs increase (more expensive raw materials, machine tools more expensive and take longer to absorb), we will not win as competitive as that … Anyway, our trading partners do not allow themselves, they. In the unlikely event that our trading partners do not say anything when you flood their domestic markets with cheaper Made in France since devalued, our imports will no matter what price increase 20% to 25% and therefore our production costs increase (more expensive raw materials, machine tools more expensive and take longer to absorb), we will not win as competitive as that … Anyway, our trading partners will not let themselves do ilsprendront protectionist measures in return, nullifying our advantage competitive export (but still important at higher cost …) And that's part of the iceberg! I do not even talk about their positions on the death penalty (for) or abortion rights (against). A victory of the FN is not desirable, then I will vote for the PS (if not the UMP is not in the 2nd round).

PS If you vote then you praise the right has always been, you're a false Derche first …

well I'd like you Never in my life I would vote FN

Get out the head of water, and stops to see the part of the iceberg …

but you really start to crap your pants at the UMP @ Miney: You should read the entire text, not the title

you have some strange theories. how many countries "euro" are "bankruptcy" or in the red and this will continue. after Greece, Ireland, Portugal, Spain it will be France.

Good! you go back in my opinion ….

Thank you! It reassures me that there are still sensible people like you.

maintains a fhaineux starting to think about the economic ideas of marinated sow when you really open your eyes you will understand that you are a ballot for the interests of political hacks who will sell you the soup that you like the moments its aid to be in power

pout … FN proposes neither more nor less than the same ideas in Switzerland ….. who is doing not too bad yet …

http://actu.orange.fr/france/presidentielle-marine-le-pen-en-tete-au-1er-tour-sarkozy-et-ps-au-coude-a-coude_108347.html

you do not too wet. It seems that the ps will be very difficult lollll

1 – In the anus, numerous live microorganisms that exist in that place and that their role is to contribute to the "decomposition" (I do not know if this is the appropriate term) of faeces (faeces = shit-sorry for this explanation, because I do not banish this term exists in the dictionary!) These microorganisms are found ONLY in the anus, this implies how much their presence in another place can be dangerous. So when a man enters his wife through the anus: a-these organisms can penetrate through the small hole (where he pees) and may cause him serious illness including impotence and the fact of not being fertile (this means that male fertility ans spermatozoon become unfit for the fertilization of the ovum of the woman). It becomes stréril! And that's not counting local infections and the poor wretch can not make love to his beloved because he bobo! b-after penetration into the anus, the man will surely make a small tour vagina, and that there can be dramatic. 2 – Around the anus is a sphincter muscle that works a bit automatically, by contraction-expansion, ie when you want to f ***, and we're sitting on the toilet it opens (it's psychological) but not when sitting still, it remains closed! Fortunately, because otherwise, imagine the damage! This is not a voluntary act I think it's a reflex action * (or it looks like him) is not made to receive something, iln'est not designed for anything! So when the man entered through that door! it extended to every muscle as it expands! And strength, the loss of muscle strength! As a result it fails to close completely over! Well imagine you there are people whose anal sphincter muscle does not contract any further! They are obliged to put diapers! This is not funny and plus it stink! Sources: My uncle, a professor of surgery, general medicine and infectious diseases

@ Manel Christiano, you doing what else in life besides thinking about ass?

Thank you for the info

That's why it should not go against nature

Fortunately I have never practiced it. It disgusts me already … There, you put the package!

Are you Doctor? .. I do not believe everything you just tell. waste "poop" are already prepared and stored in the small intestine. these wastes can not leave because the anus is sealed. an anus is closed premeditated by man, because being away from home, the man manages to keep up the house .. into the toilet. So the man contracts and relaxes the muscle volontairement.c is only the digestive juice and digestion which convert food waste. no anus. also gives your stem .. thank you!

Outside the very last point on which you approach that I have some doubts to have known cases that match what you describe, I would tend to refute your argument (not necessarily what you assert, but the consequences or deductions that you draw). 1) Some micro-organisms that exist there. Yes, unreservedly. 2) They may also become pathogenic. Yes. However, some environments are especially equipped for defense. 3) After [...] surely do a small tour vagina. It can. Or not. Personally, whenever I happened to go from back to front, I always made a detour to the bathroom before. No question, in fact, mixing the two. I even tried (with some success) to educate those of my friends that I knew "practitioners." Yeah, it cuts a little note, but when it's clear to both, it poses no real problem. 4) micro-organisms can enter through the meatus should be noted that one can wear a condom. 4) micro-organisms can enter through the meatus should be noted that one can wear a condom (in many cases it is strongly recommended). Apart from this solution, nature is still rather well done. Have you noticed how often, after an orgasm, want to have to go pee? This reaction is not psychological (as opposed to what one of my friends has long believed), nor the only result that prostate snaps into position "standard". It is an internal cleaning mechanism, which aims to remove the seeds eventually introduced into the urethra. This is useful for everyone since it can also nab the nasty microbes in the vagina. On the question of the anal sphincters is like all practices: enough is enough. A little exercise is good for health. Many sports that require attention. Too little sports seriously damaging and even killing. Same thing here. Any damage that you describe do exist, but they correspond to extreme practices and remain very marginal in relation to the total number of sodomites. Those who have. Desproblèmes those who are most often people who do not take basic precautions, or who have not been sufficiently attentive to their bodies. In summary, your post is unnecessarily alarmist and, in this form, untrue. Basically, as it is written, it looks like "smoking kills" on cigarette packages: "sodomy will make you sterile and incontinent" (you forgot "and send you straight to hell"). NO. The reality, as often is much more nuanced. Sodomy is a practice that requires care and vigilance. And which, I grant you, those who do not want should not be forced. As in all areas of love. No? ================================ @ Anna: Why? Did you find anything in the "life", more important or more interesting than the ass? ================================ @ Christiano: the reference to your source confirms what I thought. Your uncle, by the nature of its activity, is typically in the syndrome of "the tree that hides the. Your uncle, by the nature of its activity, is typically in the syndrome of "the tree that hides laforêt" sodomites the few who have problems come to see the multitude that goes do not contact, outcome, he sees only the minority. QED.

A link, a book title, anything, but a source please! I remain skeptical!

1 – In the anus, numerous live microorganisms that exist in that place and that their role is to contribute to the "decomposition" (I do not know if this is the appropriate term) of faeces (faeces = shit-sorry for this explanation, because I do not banish this term exists in the dictionary!) These microorganisms are found ONLY in the anus, this implies how much their presence in another place can be dangerous. So when a man enters his wife through the anus: a-these organisms can penetrate through the small hole (where he pees) and may cause him serious illness including impotence and the fact of not being fertile (this means that male fertility ans spermatozoon become unfit for the fertilization of the ovum of the woman). It becomes stréril! And that's not counting local infections and the poor wretch can not make love to his beloved because he bobo! b-after penetration into the anus, the man will surely make a small tour vagina, and that there can be dramatic. 2 – Around the anus is a sphincter muscle that works a bit automatically, by contraction-expansion, ie when you want to f ***, and we're sitting on the toilet it opens (it's psychological) but not when sitting still, it remains closed! Fortunately, because otherwise, imagine the damage! This is not a voluntary act I think it's a reflex action * (or it looks like him) is not made to receive something, iln'est not designed for anything! So when the man entered through that door! it extended to every muscle as it expands! And strength, the loss of muscle strength! As a result it fails to close completely over! Well imagine you there are people whose anal sphincter muscle does not contract any further! They are obliged to put diapers! This is not funny and plus it stink!

Super!

ahem! ok, I'll think banning sodomy in my life then! horrib is' what you say!

Yes, but it's so good …

should not be clairvoyant to think about what will happen in the spincter destroying them but you have to be perverse to practice sodomy with a woman (I do not speak of homosexuals is their problem

yes, it's a biology course with highly structured examples thank you

Finally, something sensible and intelligent to say in this topic. It is always wise to give such information to a lot of people who know nothing about this practice and fellatio and cunnilingus.

My dear, it is also practiced between two men … Anyway, thank you for the comment very unsavory, I would not die silly.

After these explanations will reflect the followers of this practice, I have to tell you, "VIVE LA Jobs."

FN you vote?

finally someone who does not trivialize sodomy as too many have tended to do today and thank you for detailed explanations as well mealtime it is not the most appetizing …

I have the relationships they are family, friends or workers who are either Muslim or far-right and I feel very often hear the same speech, regrets the loss of moral values, conservatism, abortion , homophobia, xenophobia, racism, intolerance, feminism, anti-Semitism etc. ….. you have the same feeling some interesting answers, but as usual @ samira is next to the plate, just for info, to return to my associates, we do not always choose his family, his colleagues at work, or you're damned hypocrite for daring to be intrumentalisé hold about as far from reality. @ Samira, Muslims from far left, left me laughing for gay marriage, abortion, sexual freedom, marx in place of Muhammad (SAW), you should get back to books and improve your general knowledge . …., etc.

Frankly Muslim side (s) yes indeed people can be really intolerant vis a vis those who do not behave like them. Regarding right-wing people I do not know so I can not say the above.

Yes Indeed in countries with Muslim majorities, the far right is like the FN, but replacing "Christian values" with "Muslim values" Islamophobia by Christianophobia. The rest of the speech, it is the same (especially as regards the Jews …). EDIT @ lalbana "Islam is a political leftist" Your leftist Islamist Iran, Saudi Arabia or Yemen, a lot like the extreme right!

say that the FN is to appropriate the secularism that is worth saying rather inapplicable with their intolerance! I must admit that fund mosques with public money, it bothers me, as the Koran verses that will fuel the hatred and a call to war against infidels which is anti republican values,

FN hates the human race below, it spits on blacks, Arabs and all that is not white. Islam hates the FN for! Never repeat this nonsense like that!

The far right still mark a big difference, she does not like abroad and is afraid of it, to prefer to deport rather than understanding. The extreme right will stop a lot of physical barriers. In Islam it is forbidden to stop at its gates, it should also seek in them the hyphen that used to come closer. But it is true that some Muslims revolted against the radicalism of some, and by default become too radical. It's a vicious viscieux, you just do not fall into it. It also tells us (in Islam) is needed when speaking to someone, estimate its level and align them, or even belittle them, to facilitate trade, to a possible reconciliation. While at the FN, we learn that we have to feel superior and treat the other as a dust which is to be rid of. The difference is great. Proof: You rub the Muslims, it is evident that they have to make sacrifices to serve one day of a minority.. As for those of FN, and if they think is that feeling of a majority, they decided to crush the minorities. Now, you have perhaps not get to know Muslims who live their religion in peace. I once heard a great man say that when your heart is good, everything around you is too, because your eyes see everything only in the positive.

Tien!? The elected O_O Why do you want to make you look like a Jew? Pov sucks anti-Semitic

@ Priestess: It seems that there is no right in Muslim countries or far right, Islam is a political leftist! @ Yes but the right does not exist in these countries and unfortunately you can say "The" instead of "Your" I am not Muslim;)

Religions and values they advocate are often closer to the right or the extreme right than the left … With regard specifically Islam, no Muslim will be considered in accordance with the ideas of ED for Islam in France is still a religion of "immigrants". And vote for the FN or ED, is a vote for a party that does not like immigrants (especially from Africa). But it is certain that if a Muslim party was born (even if he does not already exist), it would be classified as very right. @ Samir, Hi:) Let me quote you: "the Islamist religious parties or groups, they are more extreme left than right." look at the program of the FN (well the big points): Pro-death penalty, return to moral values, anti-abortion, preferences for housewives … Is not this more or less as advocates of Islam and Islamist movements?

History can not deny it http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nXeFJMeVKJg Islam hates the FN for! Never repeat this nonsense like that! I feel the next time you go out your baseball bat to settle his account as the FN

a little interesting site http://photospalestine.free.fr/

you do not pretend Muslim a few months ago? your attacks against Muslims are increasingly pathetic. Otherwise I agree with Lebanon, although it is difficult to place the Islamist religious parties or groups, they are more extreme left than right. Concerning your dating … Funny huh friends, but as they say "Tell me who your friends are, I'll tell you who you are"

It is true that no sociologist has done any study on the Muslim population. It is common for all, perhaps wrongly, that populism in our country when he is xenophobic, homophobic, misogynist and anti-Semitic Catholic is necessarily maurassien, which define the extreme right when it has a religious component. . It is an intellectual taboo; talk led to being called Islamophobic. Yet the construction of the intimate enemy "the West" is exactly the same as "foreigners" in European populations. In the European population, the immigrant is forcing the Third World (or South in general). English is a European and American business man, neither is even if they have immigrated to the second, a residence of 10 years and a work permit to be renewed at the prefecture. In the model of "Western" is understood as "American-Zionist" not to say Jewish history to avoid trouble. Now, this stereotype is plated. Now, this stereotype is plaquésur Europeans. The Western Muslims speak in such a forum does not tell the difference between a U.S. with a European, a Swedish one, while the Spanish way of life, worldview, living standards and expectations are completely different along the edge of the Atlantic which we live, as we saw in Europe from the north or south .. But under the keyboard of Muslim forum, they say "western" as they called "black" in the 1950s without being able to distinguish an African ultra-marine. The construction of the "West" has something to do with the alien in Sci-fi literature at the time of the American struggle for civil rights for African Americans. Moreover, there is no literature of science fiction in Arabic. The myth of the West into war against Islam is enough to replace the space opera. @ The Lebanon it is naive to speak of "Islamo-liberalism" as was done in the time of the civil war in Lebanon. It was already an expression "politically. It was already an expression "politiquementcorrecte" though the Khomeini revolution has not yet altered the policy of cocoyam.

The Islamic fundamentalist and extreme right have nothing in s'envier; These two extremes defend the same intolerances;

I live in an area where it is hot and the apartment we live in is south facing so sun all afternoon, you can not put the fan or air conditioning, too dangerous for baby! but I fear that my baby is dehydrated even though she has very little head nearly every 4 h, and I drink lots of water! but then I give in addition a small bottle of Evian or it is not necessary! @ Lady, I wish I could give her the breast more often, but my doll has a very good sleep, and it is not want to try to wake up (diaper, take a bath, tickling the feet;))! although I should not wake up! but it worries me too!

M W zidane materazzi

not useful in my personal experience. present him in more often. (Advice from my pediatrician)

The additional problem of water is that they will fill his stomach, it will suck milk so much milk as it will not hunger. But water is unhelpful to an infant and the risk is that it does not take enough weight, or lose it. Remember your baby does that when the liquid head . There is no reason for him becoming dehydrated if you proposed to him the breast as often as necessary. Moreover, if not thirsty, he does not drink, either water or milk.

Hello, After 7, including 3 babies breastfed in midsummer (born in July and August) I would say if he cries between the boobs put in. Water is the only drink useful to humans but very small so he may no longer want to breastfeed. And may also not want the bottle anyway! Short, it is not dangerous or serious to give him water but he better do it suck a little more. Finally, if there had to dehydration (I know you said "If anything is wrong and I did not see!" Mom I was an infant too ): The large fontanel (hole on top of his head) is cut; If you pinched (gently) the skin of his arm or his leg will remain what it is call'd a skin fold (the skin does not tighten immediately) Once the baby is dehydrated and in danger. If your baby is well, it is reactive as usual, he is not crying constantly or amorphous, is that everything is going well! Give him within just a little more than usual and did not see eye to the clock. If your baby is well, it is reactive as usual, he is not crying constantly or amorphous, is that everything is going well! Give him within just a few more than usual and did not see eye to the clock Here is the south of France, I have not yet dried, despite the 35/38 that we often then do you trust and do trust him because it screams very strong this stuff when it wants to drink!

I still breastfeed, but I already know that water is not good for baby because it takes the breast. They say that breast milk provides everything you need for baby food and drink. The bottom line is that the mother takes a lot of water, already it seems that breastfeed thirsty, so do not deprive yourself not, take plenty of fluids. Good luck.

it is not necessary you can put the cool mist with a washcloth wet … you can also put you in the pram and walk outside in the shade

you can screw up your breastfeeding. Put your baby more often within. You give him the application? All 4am is just so small.

I remind everyone that the ITG is very different from abortion. It is here for comfort or desire, but the fate of an abnormal child. God does have something to say about it? What do the believers?

a medical case

It is a matter of conscience for parents. Sometimes one is tempted to replace the term "therapeutic" with that of eugenics (in the spirit of "political" in any case), it still flies in the human mind the idea perfect for a race where there would be "abnormal" (but who is really normal in this world where there would ???), more diseases. You want roses without thorns, clementines Seedless, encouraging the idea of a perfect world, which should contain nothing untoward. The problem is in fact that man is himself the "unfortunate" Chief of the creation, while at the same time its ultimate peak. Wonder what will become of this supposed child abnormal, when parents are gone is a recurring argument. It is not based on trust, on faith in God. What is foolish in the world, that's what God has chosen … God speaks without hindrance from the mouths of children known abnormal … Wondering if this being designed, in most cases, the love. To ask whether this be conceived, in most cases, the amourmanifesté between two adults, has no specificity to give the world did not have a message, different and unique. Yet parents have to decide through a thorough discernment and enter into no guilt whatsoever in relation to medical authorities or religious bodies as they wish. Any decision taken involves a faith in one case as in another will have consequences that must be assumed (in trust in the God of love for believers). Through your question, you feel that you tilt to the ITG. You can do that with this choice you are today and you will probably your best, but am now supported by objective and reasonable people, having enough sense to be open to both points of view without trying to influence your choice. You 're not alone in this dilemma … whatever your decision.

Case of religion or conscience matter of conscience … But the consciousness (and ethical legislation it is the reflection group) is influenced by the philosophical, moral, and therefore particularly religious. And abortion and ITG are not "very different" in my opinion, not fundamentally anyway. First the "T" for "therapeutic" is misleading since I found incongruous to call "therapy", so carefully, the action is to cause death. Then we're in for comfort more advanced, since it is often the fear of not being able to take a disabled child (financially, physically, emotionally, morally …) leading to it. A comfort to the wider society: it is an unspoken, perhaps, but there is still a tendency to think that if one spends so valuable in our taxes to screen for trisomy (for example) that 's is not to repay back to an abnormal child … If so, this is a concept in the background in many design. If so, this is a notion in the background in many design depolitique public health. The invocation of eugenics by @ dance your life is entirely justified. Where I agree, c 'question is that the fate of an abnormal child (assuming you know what normalcy, a concept quite obvious in "macro" but that escapes into the intricacies and complexities of the human when you want to refine it). God, if there is one, probably has something to say above, except we do not know how to listen so it's tricky. Anyone who has never a word to say is that the child is born … not leave Who can decide for himself if his life has value? "The topic is difficult, and there is no question of judging those who make certain choices, I do not think better and would not do the morning if I were facing a very direct way. What I am certain that he would take better care of more serious cases involving children difficult than increasing antenatal diagnosis whose end is undoubtedly eugenics – a word that leaves. What I am certain that he would take better care of more serious cases involving children difficult than increasing antenatal diagnosis whose end is undoubtedly eugenics – a word that laissepersonne also significant, and because (in my opinion).

Stephanie of Monaco or Angela Merkel … Your choice! ——->

kind that would be against abortion, against concubinage etc. ..

why not … I know but I see nothing inconsistent

bin niece, I deleted my account and I created another and I asked a question but it does not pass, what do you think Uncle do? ^ ^

Unfortunately, the religious have no monopoly on stupidity! @ Maktub: it lacks the idea of things, but you can send your question via email, I will ask for you if you want .. . (Not that there are masochists cathos, it seems)

Ya same antioxidants and flavor, is to say …

I do have a friend who is an atheist conservative a library. count?

For sure. I know. Atheists do not necessarily share one thing: we do not believe in any god. For the rest, everyone's opinions.

Yes, I'm for it retains the sperm in the cold for in vitro fertilization post-mortem. Is a kind of resurrection scientist!

Me personally I am rather against abortion. Finally I said: as far as I'm concerned, obviously. It is not possible to deny this right to women who find themselves pregnant without being able to assume. But if I were a girl pregnant if she wanted an abortion, I would pressure her to leave and gives me the unborn baby, I would manage … As for concubinage, I do not see the problem. Here we call it a marriage without the petits fours.

Here, have decided ti li di finally take bath? Here too soon, li dipuis time. It was beginning to feel …

Admittedly, the conservative political parties are always close to the "traditional" religions of where they are. And that the vast majority are religious conservatives. Then, among conservatives, there are always current. Some focus more conservative in an economic sense may have their opinions without really thinking it over, mainly because these are the ideas from people who are close to him on what interests first. It was an example in France, Alain Madelin, whose positions on these issues are more related to his membership in a political movement than a strong opinion. For in fact, atheists have little reason to see abortion or cohabitation with the same eyes as the religious, which removes almost all strong arguments against (in meaning of the ban for others in the name of his own ideas).

Why not? Even real reactionaries. Religion has no monopoly on ideas of right. And there are believers very open. Va understand <.

I'm an atheist-fundamentalists! D (o_x) b I do not like the fuck is not the same as me! (*)

you mean that to be for life (instead of the death as certain religious) is to be conservative? I thought that promote and protect the life was pretty liberal and progressive behavior, how what we all different definitions for words!

Here I am already a father of 7 children and my wife, I love, is pregnant with eighth after a forgetting Pill recovered the next morning. We promised to stop there, but it has already experienced an abortion in inhumane conditions, so she wants to keep the baby but not me. I would like you to give me arguments for the pros and cons.

It's like Zola …

@ Greg's right … For my answer: yes, if it is on time, otherwise, abortion … 8 children !!!!! My God!

Given the experience of your wife I think she will keep this child because of fear of abortion. It will take place over a home that surely tight. But I think you will not love unless your wife and this child to come. The best will be after or even during this big she is considering another method of contraception than the pill. Unfortunately nobody can give you an opinion well enough to decide that you accept the situation especially after the eighth child. If it was still the 2nd or 3rd I think you would have had plenty of positive or negative arguments but had a position just a little more than what you currently live. 7 children is already a very nice family, but how to ask your wife to have an abortion in fear.

First of all congratulations for your 7 kids! … The arguments that I offer: FOR keep: – how an abortion is often very hard to do. It takes a strong morally and physically (an abortion was scheduled for my first, and the D-Day, I have not gone and I absolutely do not regret it) – if it falls through, we would always ask how our child. – if she had an abortion that did not go well, why the devil retried? – your wife wants to keep – a child is a + wonderful gifts that you can give us. COUNTER to keep it – if you have financial problems – why not find another hospital to do abortions? – if you're afraid of not giving as much love for everyone. – if the unborn child is not loved and labeled as "not wanted" and left behind I can not find other arguments that come. You understand that I would agree to keep, especially if your wife wants to keep it and it feels. You understand that I would agree to keep, especially if your wife wants to keep it and she sentcapable exiting in the difficult times are the beginning. I wish you courage. And a good pregnancy your wife if she were to keep it.

Personally, I have thirty kids, but not with the same mothers (about thirty as well) and not in the same country (twenty), the abortion pill, why not!

"O mankind, fear your Lord. The quake [leading up] Time is a terrible thing. The day you see it, every nursing mother will forget her suckling, and every pregnant female shall drop her. And thou shalt see mankind as drunken, yet they are not. But the punishment of Allah. "(Surah 22 / Verses 1-2) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AI9ysjbBbrY

She walks a bit, your sura. The day the world ends, I take a real cooked, you can believe me. I'll look drunk, and I'll be there!

Philippulus says the same thing:

Deeply today! This will be the party to see all these "believers" die!

Phillipulus is extra!

Lol the background is platoon soundtrack, really anything … @ Kallias, you lose absolutely nothing, the only interesting thing about this video is the music of one platoon, but alas not hear very well Due to a bearded face of bullshit .. @ Kallias

I can not open the link (yes it's slow for me) but it must be fun to read the answers! @ Eh Kriss my connection comes back slowly .. I will try to open the link;) I want to laugh too.

threats still threats. What religions are beautiful! ==> Trash.

What will happen without this god no one to pray?

it is very difficult to make forecasts … especially as regards the future!

THE LAST JUDGEMENT! 21 MAI 2011 he was given them, not kill them, but to torment them for five months: and their torment was as the torment of a scorpion when it stings a man. Apocalypse 9:5 THE END OF THE WORLD October 21, 2011

This video gives goose bumps while other think it's just blather, a joke. If they really knew if they knew

yes, God in Islam has the air of a human who loves to terrorize the poor and weak creatures …. threaten humans is what God would find meiux to do! stop …

Hitler looks like a devil hate speaking of a man he removed his glasses, black, because he sees everything in black