Posts Tagged ‘Spirit’

Simone Weil: Where Is The Freedom Of A Woman Who Sees Abortion Imposed By Her Husband?

Tuesday, October 19th, 2010

I speak of a married couple, both working with a Foye, stability in love. Claude o: she became pregnant on the pill so apparently she did not purposely get pregnant. The fact is that now a baby growing in her belly and the husband threatened to leave if not miscarried. She, she believes her husband loves her. This husband imposes his dictatorship and blackmailed. I call that violate the freedom of women. Freedom? Is this the freedom of women in France?? To Baillamisse: I am 100% agree with you but it's not my case. Here is the link to my previous question and the person in question is "a child": http://fr.answers.yahoo.com/question/index; _ylt = Al1tpdxcFc9pJbIXIILRC5s5Agx;. _ylv = 3? Qid = 20101014142551AAROYiI to "One child" http://fr.answers.yahoo.com/question/index; _ylt = AiQGtPlL3ICnAkRLcB0E2tE5Agx;. _ylv = 3? qid = 20101016045711AAPMBwB

I do not understand this question. no free and independent woman will leave her partner to impose an abortion. Now it is true that a woman has no right either to require a child to a man against his will. if a woman decides to have a child against the wishes of his companion she must bear her own choice. it is precisely that a woman can impose its will in holding itself to have a child and assume. freedom to have or not have children is in both directions. no man has the right to impose an abortion his girlfriend but no woman has the right to impose a child to a man who does not want it. if the girlfriend of my son "fell" pregnant "by accident" I think my son and we would have great doubts about that is "an accident", it's called "making a child the back of the man. "a woman that calls itself free and independent, often this kind of dilemma. the birth of a child is decided by two.

The knitter Semitic hardly deserves the consent of the people nor the feminists. Be sure to his family we do not practice abortion! Always do what I say not as I do.

you talk about simone Bariza el Mahboula

he is not a question of freedom of the woman in this case, should not mix everything! the avortment is a right granted to women, not man! you do not want to abort sending your husband to be shit and that's it! Loude all simplment! ty not ok with it leaves and keep your pti angel he is in no question in Ms. Weil's case! in this case it is not of the GMEF let s deck bar, seriously divorce and keep your child! the choice of abortion is an option given to women for reasons yY x or just something a husband lavie nevaudrz Jamis clled'un enfantd her child, a husband jem'explique u have a moment, then c ' is not said it remains for life, a child is more precious than a husband, that's life your flesh your cotinuitéet whatever happens it will not change the fact that Jamis links will forever unchanged eternity! seriously love my man but if I was in front of a dilema with him and it gosss no regrets no I choose my gossssss! not let yourselfto either accept it as it is also the rightto go! but in no case has the right to impose on you to end the life meter that you wear! all the way I see things that's how I see them!

Let Simone Weil quiet! She gave a great service to women. To achieve this it was vilified, insulted. That couples do what they want, she is responsible for anything.

Now let me be clear with you, and always before. This morning my husband changed his mind ok? and now you coward because my story-that's your fault I suffered too much stress and makes me contractions you're looking for what has let me loose to harass me as well. And you talk about crime? You do no better than him you is even worse. Because it will assume it is obvious that he is afraid. off you you had nothing to do in life you go about harassing me and me encrusted triggers contractions at risk of losing me. So now you shut your big mouth and removes me your question or the ever believe me you will regret it

Simone Weil: Where Is The Freedom Of A Woman Who Sees Abortion Imposed By Her Husband?

Tuesday, October 19th, 2010

married couple, tt 2 working, financial stability but the husband is a tyrant. Balhsen6 to: You watches very well in spelling! Lol, actually Veil. Thank you so much !!!!! "a child" is your husband who takes away your own freedom! Not me, it pushes you in the head! You are subject to the will of your husband and you live under a dictatorship because he appointed thee abortion and he also makes you leave you blackmail. WATCH THE RESPONSE OF PEOPLE WHO HAVE RESPONDED TO MY QUESTION! ! They also have crazy ??????? "Beware it can go very far the harassment" is your husband who is harassing you in asking you to abort. Files a complaint against your husband forces you to abort. YOUR HUSBAND SHOULD BE ASHAMED OF HIM! TIME IS A MURDERER 'MODERN'! That being cultivated according to you? To malka: "In no case for forcing women to have abortions." The husband of the woman who forced him to abort if he leaves. This poor woman has a knife to her throat and is subject to. This poor woman has a knife to her throat and is subject to Dictatorship of the tyrant husband. It is in France, in 2010, a married couple with one dependent child, and about 2,000 € net resource. For him, a baby is not the result of love but a heavy burden that must be eliminated at all costs, without pity, without tears, without humanity, without conscience, without scruples. His wife was ordered to commit suicide using violent extraction of the embryo nestled in her womb. Malka to: "What happens in a couple's nobody!" I'm sorry but that "a child" who came here post his question in Q / rists for advice. Everything you say is neither constructive malka nor argued, all you do is criticize. If what you say is better than silence, shut up.

Divorce is not for the dogs !!!!!

Or he does not like it, simply, why else refuse to have a child, if the two are married (for a while I guess) and their situation is stable?

Simone Veil has nothing to do if the husband is an immature idiot. The law aims to empower women and let them make their own choices, not to be used as a tool of blackmail from a moron Control freak.

she leaves him and takes it …. or it aborts and remains a big con …..

Incidentally, it should not be confused with Simone Weil, philosopher died in 1943, and Simone Veil.

uh what is the relationship with Simone Veil? if a woman is married to a tyrant, she gets pregnant but does not want this baby, several solutions available to her: – she submits, and abortion remains with her husband – but she leaves abortion because she does not want a child like him (she has a job, she is more independent financially) – she keeps her baby but leaves her husband (also note that front) – she keeps her baby and her husband (his body, he can not force her to abort) you do not know their lives, their past, their relationship, so we can not judge. you can just try to advise. the 4 solutions, the 4 is likely to be excluded (as it exists but it had to be stated). there are 3 solutions to this woman, but this choice is his. and she does not hesitate to approach the associations that help women victims of husbands tyrants (to use your expression) anyway good luck to this woman, this election will probably be one of the most difficult to take in his life

why you ask questions for which you do not seek any advice, but rather seeks what is full of your senses? You choose your MR depending on your opinion. What do you dirty whore of freedom

Apparently, you're trying to serve you a story that is not yours to get some sort of response … Take care of your business! If the person above asked a question in a moment of doubt, it looks, you do not take possession of his life to show that you would be right. And as the others have said, the Veil law is a tool designed to prevent women from being imposed unwanted pregnancies … In no case for forcing women to have abortions. What happens in a couple's nobody!

Souls Rest In Peace Of Conscience?

Tuesday, June 8th, 2010

If, according to the church, the "morning after pill" is already considered an abortion, a new question arises: Masturbation may be seen as a premeditated murder? Moreover, oral sex is what becomes of cannibalism ? And so, can we consider the withdrawal as parental neglect and what can we say about condoms? Was it murder by suffocation? I remain perplexed. ! Could someone help me??? I want to go to heaven ……….. Signed :……….. John Peupue.

its all it's nothing to do with human stupidity heaven good day

Hey well if they must go without all that much to go to heaven, I've got as much down to hell.! RTTP Kisses Flash

Bj / all this bullshit ….. kiss ¤ ^ ^ Happy Sunday

foutése all blah-blah

With regard to sex is best to avoid listening to the Church, they do not understand much about it!

Could It Be That I Am Pregnant?

Tuesday, May 11th, 2010

First, because I know what it is … I had 3 pregnancies, 1 miscarriage and 2 children, and I learned very quickly, without testing. There will be my last year I did not feel very good, very tired, very emotional , of disgust, no rules yet, but I'm not the fateful day, and I do not bellyache as usual before the big landing … No significant pain in the chest, but breastfeeding as the youngest ever, there are mounted milk, then???? No contraception at the moment …..( I lost my two months ago IUD). And tell my husband withdrew just before … you know what! I had a negative pregnancy test, but as I said above 3 or 4 days before the arrival of the rules. Can a blood test done at this stage I be permitted to know more precisely, do you? To my 3 other pregnancies the rate of hcg after 1 month ranged from 50 to 54, very little. Thanks for your help Or is all this in my. Thanks for your help Or all this is in Matete ?….. The "interuptus coitus" is a temporary solution until my next appointment with the gynecological

Owa You had three pregnancies and for you to withdraw before ejaculation is a means of contraception?! Here I do not understand everything …. Blood test you'll be set.

Coitus interruptus is the least secure (and most annoying) of contraception.

Blood test unnecessary wait at least another week. Pending use of condoms is still more secure.

The Embryo, A Human Being Full Or A Pile Of Developing Cells?

Tuesday, April 13th, 2010

This question refers to questions on abortion. But I'd like to have your opinion;)

The question I ask myself is from when the embryo has an experience of life … Today, we speak of fetuses at 8 weeks … but when is it that this cluster cell does it become human? Today, nobody has the answer but it refers, as you say, the issue of abortion.

need to exaggerate it anyway, it is not formed, this is a tit maggot http://www.doctissimo.fr/html/sante/encyclopedie/sa_579_embryon_foetus.htm

I think it's a human being. be "man" does not depend on consciousness, from the earliest days the new-born do not know they are alive, I do not think we should eliminate them for that. I think that from the time when the embryo develops, nourished and to breathe (I mean, that absorbs oxygen), do we really have to face facts, it is a human. Now on abortion , democracy allows people to see those who are cons as "wicked", the "enemy", we all prefer to be cons. Taking a step back, we might be a bullshit in the name of "freedom of Women ". but hey it does not matter.

Logically a human being deserves to be called "human being" only when it is viable outside the womb gold ……… an embryo and a fetus is not viable as I know .. …..

Attains the status of being a child born alive and viable in our civil law, and rightly so.

I had a therapeutic abortion, and I confess that I had not asked the question.

A human being full! A little baby! A child in the making!

The embryo becomes a human being when his brain is made, together with the skin. Just after the legal deadline for abortion. After that date, we can consider that an embryo is a human being, because his brain is developed. That is why there is a fixed date for the abortion.

we already talked about why you defer it? 're pregnant?

Furuta a baby passes through three stages, an egg, an embryo and a foeutus an egg is a bunch of cells just an embryo is a bunch of cells begin to differentiate and to form organs, but don ' is not considered one human being, because it resembles an embryo has any of the above animals. if it was from the stage foeutus that are considered one be a fully qualified because most faults are detected and little whether it was going to live birth. uestion if not for abortion, it has voir.si each of the embryo are highly deformed and not viable, then why keep him in the stomach? else if there are normal, even from the egg stage is a pity to kill him, because even if mtn is a bunch of cells, it will be a baby in the future, it's just a matter of time

How Did Hitler He Convinced A Whole Nation To Exterminate The Jews?

Friday, March 5th, 2010

It's very simple, he made them believe that they were not human. Why are Americans they killed Indians without regret or remorse because they were told that they were just wild. Now you understand how one can push a mother killed her baby through the abortion by pretending that it is not yet a human being go www.ivg.net

Milgram experiment regard to abortion: will look elsewhere if I am!

Jewish and you think you got the solution

Propaganda ???????,, It is where the issue.

Abortion is ds some cases inevitable question of life or death. Qd c but not based on medical reasons for life or death c tres grave. C immoral people say that the church should support abortion and c of madness in my opinion.

c for the rest ok and really unhappy but for the Jewish c really not humans, deserve .. after touskil are in Palestine, although I naisssss a new hitler

Perfect Obedience To God It Is A Prevention Against Misfortune?

Friday, February 12th, 2010

Commands guidance principles are not given it to prevent the evil example fornication causes as a result: – Abortion – illness – grief – illegitimate birth and many other things even if it escapes must see that the fruit produced no are not those we can hope for happiness @ Starbuck is one example that I took Haiti did not listen to his principles and cry now yes it does not build in the bed of a River ……

not perfect obedience does not protect against misfortune, it avoids some of us that's all. An illegitimate birth is a misfortune? a birth for me is happiness and that's all. And what a birth is illegitimate? You make me the trouble of Gen, I am sad to know that people like you are still rampant among us. Having this principle well. Being non-bounded. DDITION @: Haiti? Gen, my little Gen, you're a monster.

You forget Job. He kept the Law of God, and yet it did not hesitate to "let" Satan. Fun as it may …

The book forced abstinence: "frustration, grief, behavioral disorders, depression (the suffering of your sisters, too numerous to be all a man among them TJ is well recognized in hints by your leaders in the Watchtower ) – and some even claim deafness. Otherwise, there are other ways of prejudice against most of the consequences of which you talk about here, you are aware I guess …;-)

Ah I see is sex on your mind … and without this fear and precaution damn … who knows? There are pleasures that are worth the misfortunes that follow!

Let all this: 1) abortions: a) contraception is there to prevent this kind of drama b) even within a couple of "legitimate" Pregnancy can be dramatic and lead to an abortion! 2) diseases: to guard against STDs, just use condoms 3) grief?? 4) illegitimacy: return to 1) … That said, a birth is not wrong! a child "illegitimate" would be for you a fruit that is not afraid to hope for happiness? What a shame to have such thoughts! Live like you mean, but let others choose, for pity! Perfect obedience is only the denial of his own free will, the refusal of his own ability to think and decide, not according to others, whether god or another human, but of course! This leads inevitably to the true evil, bigotry, inhumanity.

That's exactly right. God knows what is good for us as we never know

Completely agree!

No, it is tested according to the intensity of faith that one and it has more the test is higher and hence the prophets are the most experienced among humans. And God does not test us more than we can bear "by your obedience to protect you against the wrath and punishment of Allah and hope you will have a place in his vast paradise and to understand these words must be a believer.

Perfect obedience is perfect as when based on the love of God, when a foundation for the love of God. "Obey out of fear of punishment would be an obedience of slave and not a free man, who freely chose to give God his trust. It is an important distinction to identify his relationship to God. In Romans 8: 03 For when God sent His own Son into our sinful human condition to overcome the sin he has done what the law of Moses could not do because of human weakness: he destroyed sin in human flesh. 15 The Spirit you received does not you slaves, people who still fear it is a spirit that makes you the son, moved by the Spirit, we cry to the Father, calling him "Abba! And in 1 Corinthians 13: 01 I can talk about all the languages of earth and sky, so I have not love, if I lack love, I am only sounding brass, a tinkling cymbal. 02 I'm a prophet, having all. 02 I'm a prophet, having toutela science mysteries and all knowledge of God and any faith to move mountains if I miss the love I am nothing. 03 I beautiful distribute my wealth to the hungry, I am beautiful to burn alive if I miss the love, it does me no good. 04 Love is patient, love makes service, love does not jealous, it does not boast, does not swell with pride; 05 there is nothing dishonest, it does not seek its own interest it does not gets carried away and he has no grudge; 06 it not rejoice in what is evil, but he finds joy in what is true, 07 it bears all things, he believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things. And true love means hope for those which are wrong, and love them, without condemning ourselves, under the pretext that we would be those who behave "good" and them, those who behave "badly". Being in love means to ask God control our tendency to judge. This is done by an objective insight. This is done by an objective luciditépar over our own sin. To think that we know who are good and which are bad is the original temptation that has separated us from the love. Jesus restored access to the love of God, but by our "yes" this may be operative in us and lead us to love unconditionally and without merit is that God has for everyone.

Remember that you witness jehovah.

This question is very badly put: it should rather ask if you accept Jesus Christ as your personal savior!

Perfect obedience to God is a prevention against the eternal misery, because it is obeying the commandments of God that reaches heaven.

If you mean blind obedience and perfect the "falsification-fundamentalist" College Central Jehovah's Witnesses, no thank you. Matthew 7:15 "Beware of false prophets. They come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly are ravening wolves. "How good are the fruit produced in large greenhouses where the plants do not see the sand?

Hello, I think it will take you to explain to Job that, contrary to what God told him, his friends were right and that if he suffered that he has sinned. "Haiti does not listened to his principles and cry now>> yes we do not build in the bed of a river …… 13:1-5 In that day, a few people who were there told Jesus what had happened to Galileans whom Pilate had mingled with the blood of their sacrifices. He replied: Do you think that these Galileans were worse sinners than all other Galileans because they suffered such things? No, I tell you. But unless you repent, you shall all likewise perish. Or those eighteen people who fell on the tower of Siloam and that she has killed, do you think they were more guilty than all the other inhabitants of Jerusalem? No, I tell you. But unless you repent, you shall all likewise perish. Jesus said that we can not deduce the misfortunes of someone or a nation. Jesus said that we can not deduce the misfortunes of someone or nationpar the number of their misfortune. You say that is the case, forgive me if I prefer to believe. Regards, Emmanuel

hello Gen Perfect obedience to God is not prejudiced against the evils is to be inhabited by the Spirit of God is a perfect prevention against misfortune. The misfortunes are the fruits of sin. Knowing the law and obedience depends on our level of consciousness. As our level of pure consciousness is our ability to act is just high. Be inhabited by the Spirit of God is the level of consciousness as is so pure as the Apostle says: He who is filled with the Spirit of God, sin no more. @ You Gen is naive to believe that without the presence of 'Spirit of God in us perfect obedience to God is possible.

it protects us from some evils that we give to us even as the abuse of alcohol or another, but certain things happen and are permitted by God so that we will not order new gere by God and his fils.Des Witnesses Haiti has died but God remembers His servants! Job has been an issue but has shown his faith and his loyalty is an example for us

Bonsoir @ Gen, I do not think that perfect obedience is the right word, and it exists, but it is certain that if the commandments are respected, if adultery is avoided, there will be no share of grief and others, as for abortions, alcoholism, murder committed because of jealousy .. but perfect obedience is not unhappy, and all the pitfalls that have created the man because of this imperfection, fall into the trap of trouble not possible. It is time that humans realize their misfortune and say … Oh if I had known … if I had better controlled my actions, I would not be there. But it is more often than humans falls headlong in his desires in the wish, without asking any question if he Souffir goes, it goes to the act while thinking of him, without asking the three quarter of the time if that displease God, it's true that if obedience was enforced, there would be less. But it is more often than humans falls headlong in his desires in the wish, without asking any question if it will Souffir, he proceeded to act while thinking of him, without ask three quarters of the time if that displease God, it's true that if obedience was enforced, there would be fewer unhappy people .. but obedience is not perfect.

On the contrary, the faithful observance of the commandments will be more exposed to the torments of the world. Luke 21 9Quand you hear of wars and insurrections, do not be scared, because it is necessary that these things happen first. But this is not the end yet. 10Alors he said: For nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom; 11il there will be great earthquakes and in various places plagues and famines and there will be fearful sights and great signs from heaven. 12Mais before all this, we will hand over you, and persecute you; they deliver you to synagogues, they will throw you in jail, you lead before kings and governors before, because of my name. 13Cela will happen to you a testimony. 14Mettez yourselves in the minds not to meditate your defense 15car give you a mouth and wisdom which all your adversaries shall not resist or contradict. 16Vous be betrayed both by your parents, your brothers, your relatives. 16Vous be betrayed both by your parents, your brothers, your procheset by your friends, and they will kill more of you. 17Vous will be hated by all because of my name. 18Mais he did not lose a hair your head; 19par your perseverance you will win your souls. saints were satanic attacks that prove they were in tune with God. it is not for us to believe us "fair and observing the commandments of God, it would make We sin of pride, so unjust. there is no just not one in the world! Rom 3 9 What then? we are better than others?. For we have already proved that both Jews and Greeks, are under the dominion of sin, 10 as it is written: There is none righteous, not even one; 11 No one is smart, no one seeks God, all are lost, all are perverted; 12 There is none that doeth good, no, not one; Haiti? verse 11 of Luke to mention, above. happiness for them is that they have lost everything, even their families, absolutely everything except the faith they have even. Happiness for them is that they have lost everything, even their families, absolutely everything except the faith they have mêmeaugmenté. Incredible, "and complained of a little snow! They are already saved. Note verse 17, you will be hated by all because my name is Jesus Christ who speaks, and not Jehovah. dissiciez since you Jesus God, how do you explain these verses?

Romans 5:19 ….. For just as through the disobedience of the one man many were made sinners, so also through the obedience of this one person will be made righteous much If Adam and Eve had obeyed ……… we don ' in would not be here ……

Can Not Find That His Holiness Is Hypocritical?

Tuesday, December 29th, 2009

in his speech, the pope called for tolerance, but periodically, we're rehashing his homophobia and his opposition to abortion is all this nonsense, not surprising that a good woman fell on the coat … I am d agreement that everything is allowed, but what you say does not hold water. Take the case of homosexuals, many of them like to live normally and be heterosexual but it is impossible! So why blame as well? it's stupid and nasty I think.

I totally agree. It calls for tolerance, generosity and self-giving, all that kind of thing very beautiful. But then, in the mouth of someone who lives in opulence and never gives his own pocket that makes task … There is still one of the best people to change Christianity, and given the status of this belief, he has an interest to do so quickly. DDITION @: no no, not gay would not be heterosexual, they want to be gay and they want to be left to live as they see fit.

Tolerance of the fetus, it also has

not .. still free to listen to you nostalgic for the USSR or the imams ..

generosity and everything that follows is on but not forget that there are things that are not allowed in the Bible, but nobody cares about it because in today's world, to all you hear, you'd think everything is possible but it's wrong! We're just free to do what we want but we will suffer in life or beyond without frightening is not my goal. I only remember the things that everyone forgets and even I'm complaining but I assume, just remember that not everything is permitted, it is that the Pope wants us to understand.

It looks strangely Sarkozy! LOL!

I rather see a crook who tries to sell you something that no standard exists for me he is head of a kind of pedophilia in the covered states leading share of asses and blessed that erases their lousy way to the Mass from time to time make it a little cleaning but c is very little hand report the truth that the old man left his cures to marry for this masquerade to become more healthy

Related Blogs

Well, If It Is Against The Absolute Growth, We Are Selfish?

Friday, December 18th, 2009

t agree with you

The decrease means in practice that: * in stable population, the total share decreases, and therefore share some … * decreases with increasing population, the decrease is even stronger … which means lower level of Life … A population decline in life expectancy led to a steadily aging population, which implies an increase in inactive compared to active, and thus a lower standard of living of one or the the other categories … So the decline increases the risk of conflict for the distribution of wealth and therefore increases the likelihood of wars and conflicts …

Related Blogs

Categories
Search
Bookmarks