when Christians who have these values, which respect the most values of the church: gay marriage ban no abortions no no global world order ect. @ Father sifleur but concern for foreign aid, the poor, the destitute, rejection, are Christian values, and left!

hummm I think the extreme right … BOUTIN girlfriend or whatever is found.

Christians vote right or extreme right.

Yes, far-right Christian Democratic Party or Christine Boutin. @ Whistler Father is adamant again, but there are Christians on the left as there are Christians on the right.

the FN and the MPF.

((((((( NO ONCE IN POWER THEY HOLD their promises !!!)))))) PARTY FOR ME I VOTE FOR CONS!

Tradition holds us when you are!

Strange … because very contradictory, but indeed I think it is well established traditions in the brains of very exclusive …

Because these people have no sense. Dictate what the idiots want, they want

But is it not equally contradictory to be for abortion and against the death penalty? That is to say, taking the life of an innocent and let it saves a rot. They therefore have no logic, it is the diktat of morons and very closed from what I read above.

Me, no. I am against abortion, and especially against the death penalty.

The reverse is equally troubling and the much more common, most who are against the death penalty for abortion is not a paradox we kill those who are weak, words, fetuses, etc., a human power

You seem to do a lot of fillings in your questions. Other form of prejudice? But a different style Islamists.

not at all certain I am for the death penalty and abortion and am not the only

"Cons" "to" to do a case by case

Women adulterers stoned here, same-sex marriages performed there, sanctioned pedophilia, excision traditional trivialized sexual harassment, drug use is authorized, the concept of terrorism, surrogate mother, abortion, euthanasia. …. so what do you think? ditto on the Internet: Censorship and the words or images allowed a country to another? **** example rather nondescript word American is always a keyword automatically censored but the "con" the Marseillaise? PS some do not even read the question? it is absolutely not a question of DSK but more comprehensive approaches to countries around the world.

strauss khan is the archetype of the worst bourgeois bastard! a true socialist somehow!

DSK once said "For me, it is not proper for a minister to continue performing its mission, so there exists a suspicion against him resulting in a judicial proceeding, the risk of undermining the entire Government. " Whether guilty or not even the problem is gone, our politicians represent our country, they must lead by example and be above reproach. They embody the values of our Nation! At least hope that this case will give the last record straight …

it is true that there is a serious ethical problem worldwide but ………….. impossible to solve ……… each not having the same sense of things ………. extensive debate ………..

This is not the global society is at stake but the French company acquiesced DSK many years without saying anything. Many French women had already sounded the alarm but France did nothing. Otherwise they are foreigners who are in our place.

I do not think less. The deputy of Paris, who posted a note on his blog Sunday strongly criticized the left, says Dominique Strauss-Kahn has already attacked in the past other maids in the same New York hotel.

DSK epitomizes totalitarian dictatorship in the French style, rich men, contemptuous of the people, and rotten to the moelle.le government revoke a teacher who made an honest debate on abortion, but protects a serial rapist, thank you the American justice to get rid of this monster and thereby protect those who could be his future victims. And a little compassion for those who have little to be aborted because of this junk

Case Cheb Mami [edit] In November 2005, a complaint is filed against a photographer Cheb Mami French press that specializes in Rai, ex-girlfriend of singer she met during a 2004 interview. Pregnant singer, she refused an abortion he would have asked him repeatedly. In late August 2005, at the instigation of Michael Levy, impresario of Cheb Mami, she was invited to Algeria. In fact it was taken over by the local artistic director and driving in a bungalow where he is offered a refreshing drink which is drugged. She stated when she regained consciousness was a property of Cheb Mami, where elongated force, she was struck in the abdomen overnight by three women who try this way to induce a forced abortion [1]. Two doctors have tried to make a forced curettage [2]. In the morning, bleeding and gasping, she is released into a taxi and returned to Paris. Shocked and hurt, of. Shocked and hurt, deretour in France, doctors are finding that the fetus is still viable. Learner's failure forced abortion, Cheb Mami would have then proposed a sum of money in exchange for his silence about the ordeal she had suffered, and to have an abortion at his expense. In March 2006 she gave birth to a baby girl. With a record where the singer yells, "You no longer have a baby: the blood, I saw him. It was like a piece of liver "[1], the police stopped him October 25, 2006 at the descent of a flight from Oran and he is incarcerated, to deliberate violence, kidnapping and threats, for 3 and a half months VIP area of Health in Paris before being released on bail in exchange for a fee of 200,000 euros and the confiscation of his passport. It prevents justice by fleeing to Algeria then using paper obsolete. Upon his return to France June 29, 2009, he was arrested at Orly airport shortly after 19h and immediately placed in judicial retention [3]. In. Dansune interview Quotidien d'Oran [4], Cheb Mami said he was blackmailed and eagerness of the French media because it would be a "star Arabic." By giving his version, he acknowledges the facts and says "the biggest mistake of my life is to have followed the bad advice of my Jewish manager. For him, it does not flee from justice but would be tried in Algeria because he believes no longer have confidence in French justice. In response to an interview with the daily El Watan Cheb Mami [5] Mohamed Laribi, lawyer Michael Levy, manager of Cheb Mami, denounces the strategy of anti-Arab conspiracy and asks Cheb Mami assume his actions [6]. On July 3, 2009, the court in Bobigny (Seine-Saint-Denis), sentenced to five years in prison for attempted forced abortion on his ex-girlfriend [7]. On 21 September 2010, he applied for parole with the court enforcement of sentences of Melun [8], which will be denied October 12, 2010 [9] and allowed March 23, 2011. [10

I love cheb mami aisha aisha aisha aisha hear me ooohhhh not blame you!

We should have cut his balls in this context! Like that in future it would not need to "abort girls with whom he sleeps, and in addition it would stop breaking our ears …

this says it all as his sidekick Cheb Khaled, it is not quite finished this gentleman … drug helping … no need to be Algerian to be as dilapidated! bullshit does not spare some nationalities

Because the French are civilized

cons! but there are abortions under the cloak! m ^ me but when a life is a life! bizzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzooooooooooooooooouuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuus!!

Hello, Islam forbids abortion, but this prohibition is more or less severe depending on the circumstances and the state of fetal development. The prohibition is absolute after 120 days of pregnancy (blowing in the real soul). Except for the Maliki school, abortion can be allowed before the 120 days in case of dire need recognized (fetal malformation, life-threatening for the mother, rape, disabled mother could not provide education of the child). Sincerely, good Sunday!

Strictly forbidden except in extreme cases where the mother's life is greatly in danger!

ah it's an interesting question! she is often asked to Cathos, but never to the Muslims I will read the answers with you:)

cons, it allows them to reproduce quickly and spread + venom

Before the revelation of the Koran, the Arab tribes were disbelieving of practice "bizarre". When the couple had a daughter, they took it as a curse and buried. It is an unwanted child but at the time, ultrasound and pregnancy tests did not exist.

1 – In the anus, numerous live microorganisms that exist in that place and that their role is to contribute to the "decomposition" (I do not know if this is the appropriate term) of faeces (faeces = shit-sorry for this explanation, because I do not banish this term exists in the dictionary!) These microorganisms are found ONLY in the anus, this implies how much their presence in another place can be dangerous. So when a man enters his wife through the anus: a-these organisms can penetrate through the small hole (where he pees) and may cause him serious illness including impotence and the fact of not being fertile (this means that male fertility ans spermatozoon become unfit for the fertilization of the ovum of the woman). It becomes stréril! And that's not counting local infections and the poor wretch can not make love to his beloved because he bobo! b-after penetration into the anus, the man will surely make a small tour vagina, and that there can be dramatic. 2 – Around the anus is a sphincter muscle that works a bit automatically, by contraction-expansion, ie when you want to f ***, and we're sitting on the toilet it opens (it's psychological) but not when sitting still, it remains closed! Fortunately, because otherwise, imagine the damage! This is not a voluntary act I think it's a reflex action * (or it looks like him) is not made to receive something, iln'est not designed for anything! So when the man entered through that door! it extended to every muscle as it expands! And strength, the loss of muscle strength! As a result it fails to close completely over! Well imagine you there are people whose anal sphincter muscle does not contract any further! They are obliged to put diapers! This is not funny and plus it stink! Sources: My uncle, a professor of surgery, general medicine and infectious diseases

@ Manel Christiano, you doing what else in life besides thinking about ass?

Thank you for the info

That's why it should not go against nature

Fortunately I have never practiced it. It disgusts me already … There, you put the package!

Are you Doctor? .. I do not believe everything you just tell. waste "poop" are already prepared and stored in the small intestine. these wastes can not leave because the anus is sealed. an anus is closed premeditated by man, because being away from home, the man manages to keep up the house .. into the toilet. So the man contracts and relaxes the muscle volontairement.c is only the digestive juice and digestion which convert food waste. no anus. also gives your stem .. thank you!

Outside the very last point on which you approach that I have some doubts to have known cases that match what you describe, I would tend to refute your argument (not necessarily what you assert, but the consequences or deductions that you draw). 1) Some micro-organisms that exist there. Yes, unreservedly. 2) They may also become pathogenic. Yes. However, some environments are especially equipped for defense. 3) After [...] surely do a small tour vagina. It can. Or not. Personally, whenever I happened to go from back to front, I always made a detour to the bathroom before. No question, in fact, mixing the two. I even tried (with some success) to educate those of my friends that I knew "practitioners." Yeah, it cuts a little note, but when it's clear to both, it poses no real problem. 4) micro-organisms can enter through the meatus should be noted that one can wear a condom. 4) micro-organisms can enter through the meatus should be noted that one can wear a condom (in many cases it is strongly recommended). Apart from this solution, nature is still rather well done. Have you noticed how often, after an orgasm, want to have to go pee? This reaction is not psychological (as opposed to what one of my friends has long believed), nor the only result that prostate snaps into position "standard". It is an internal cleaning mechanism, which aims to remove the seeds eventually introduced into the urethra. This is useful for everyone since it can also nab the nasty microbes in the vagina. On the question of the anal sphincters is like all practices: enough is enough. A little exercise is good for health. Many sports that require attention. Too little sports seriously damaging and even killing. Same thing here. Any damage that you describe do exist, but they correspond to extreme practices and remain very marginal in relation to the total number of sodomites. Those who have. Desproblèmes those who are most often people who do not take basic precautions, or who have not been sufficiently attentive to their bodies. In summary, your post is unnecessarily alarmist and, in this form, untrue. Basically, as it is written, it looks like "smoking kills" on cigarette packages: "sodomy will make you sterile and incontinent" (you forgot "and send you straight to hell"). NO. The reality, as often is much more nuanced. Sodomy is a practice that requires care and vigilance. And which, I grant you, those who do not want should not be forced. As in all areas of love. No? ================================ @ Anna: Why? Did you find anything in the "life", more important or more interesting than the ass? ================================ @ Christiano: the reference to your source confirms what I thought. Your uncle, by the nature of its activity, is typically in the syndrome of "the tree that hides the. Your uncle, by the nature of its activity, is typically in the syndrome of "the tree that hides laforêt" sodomites the few who have problems come to see the multitude that goes do not contact, outcome, he sees only the minority. QED.

A link, a book title, anything, but a source please! I remain skeptical!

1 – In the anus, numerous live microorganisms that exist in that place and that their role is to contribute to the "decomposition" (I do not know if this is the appropriate term) of faeces (faeces = shit-sorry for this explanation, because I do not banish this term exists in the dictionary!) These microorganisms are found ONLY in the anus, this implies how much their presence in another place can be dangerous. So when a man enters his wife through the anus: a-these organisms can penetrate through the small hole (where he pees) and may cause him serious illness including impotence and the fact of not being fertile (this means that male fertility ans spermatozoon become unfit for the fertilization of the ovum of the woman). It becomes stréril! And that's not counting local infections and the poor wretch can not make love to his beloved because he bobo! b-after penetration into the anus, the man will surely make a small tour vagina, and that there can be dramatic. 2 – Around the anus is a sphincter muscle that works a bit automatically, by contraction-expansion, ie when you want to f ***, and we're sitting on the toilet it opens (it's psychological) but not when sitting still, it remains closed! Fortunately, because otherwise, imagine the damage! This is not a voluntary act I think it's a reflex action * (or it looks like him) is not made to receive something, iln'est not designed for anything! So when the man entered through that door! it extended to every muscle as it expands! And strength, the loss of muscle strength! As a result it fails to close completely over! Well imagine you there are people whose anal sphincter muscle does not contract any further! They are obliged to put diapers! This is not funny and plus it stink!

Super!

ahem! ok, I'll think banning sodomy in my life then! horrib is' what you say!

Yes, but it's so good …

should not be clairvoyant to think about what will happen in the spincter destroying them but you have to be perverse to practice sodomy with a woman (I do not speak of homosexuals is their problem

yes, it's a biology course with highly structured examples thank you

Finally, something sensible and intelligent to say in this topic. It is always wise to give such information to a lot of people who know nothing about this practice and fellatio and cunnilingus.

My dear, it is also practiced between two men … Anyway, thank you for the comment very unsavory, I would not die silly.

After these explanations will reflect the followers of this practice, I have to tell you, "VIVE LA Jobs."

FN you vote?

finally someone who does not trivialize sodomy as too many have tended to do today and thank you for detailed explanations as well mealtime it is not the most appetizing …

give birth to children who are breastfeeding, taking care of them when they are small etc. .. If yes, why has so much misery is that mothers have so cherished in their hearts, by stoning, in veiling them …

No no it says that it is men who have vaginas and child birth ….. An answer to the height of the item.

I piss on your bible ….

if you want to teach you bought the Koran in French, you'll get your answers, but you lavas brain before touching it, all your questions concerning the Koran, you want to convert or what?

In the Koran it says a lot of things he is forbidden to denounce not sue to Islam. The criticism is to make a Salafi strict and literal interpretation of the Koran as the imam of Venissieux. Which is to blame them for being pile.

Women in the Quran? ah yes, the slaves of matchos pedophiles … ah yes, they talk!

because 80% are illiterate, uneducated, they do not read, they are how their inculquentt!

My doe, all Muslim women are not stoned to death (thank you god, so to speak), nor veiled elsewhere. Many of them, educated, single (yes) to wear the hijab or veil around whatsoever. It is a religious symbol, they love their religion so they wear it. So enough of the ugly stereotypes about husbands and naughty son, who oppress their wives or their mothers forced them to wear the burqa "as you say in rhyme is a bit easy, right? These idiots do not represent the majority. So ask a Muslim woman, veiled or not if she is not happy in the midst of his 12 children when it serves their couscous she spent the afternoon preparing … As Catholic women, not veiled, with her 10 children, when serving breakfast to everyone while dad reads the newspaper … Violence against women is not exclusive to Muslims, many Christians pif the stuff of their dear and tender roast when they feel that is undercooked or Missis. Violence against women is not exclusive to Muslims, many Christians pif the stuff of their dear and tender roast when they feel that is undercooked or Madam Atropa spoke with his next door neighbor … Violence against women is perpetrated by idiots, and unfortunately this breed is not extinct.

in both cases the victim "is not conscious." but does that justify murder?

In the case of abortion you kill some cells if it is in early pregnancy in the case of an adult you kill a conscious person who has lived There is no mention of victim in the case of a person, fertilized ovum is not regarded as being a person

A fetus is an embryo, not a human being.

You really poses the question here? It's your best argument? The difference between an embryo and an adult? One is a been fully developed and autonomous. The other a small cluster of cells unable to survive outside the womb. One is already alive, the other not. One is a human being, the other not. Priestess @: I accept your argument ^^… I concluded that … Does it can still be semi-solid cannibalism?

1) Remove cells that are not even yet become a "person", and 2) kill "a human being" itself are two different things. In the first case, it allows the woman, who is free to do what she wants with her body and not be forced to have a dependent child if she does not feel ready or if n 'has the capacity (or even if she does not want, freedom requires a large number of possibilities). In the second, it is murder – because it is a human being born – and it will incur a prison sentence. I do not know how to explain it better. @ Sun Palestine: maybe you're upset for rape? It's weird as a principle, each his own eh. You're all well understood my words … I'll rephrase … you know many people who are scrambling to break / be raped? Rape is sexual intercourse involuntary victim (usually the woman) … if it results in a pregnancy, you must keep the poor victim the child of a psychotic monster? That we can understand ^ ^

The same as between oral sex and cannibalism.

That's 2 lives destroyed. The fetus is a living being called to life as a man or woman. the embryo is also a "living" in a human formation in the womb. Killing a person is unconscious, asleep, unconscious is murder in the same way that killing a conscious person. Do not compare abortion to murder someone who is already living outside the womb. An abortion is an abortion but it ends with a promise of life as a human being viable. You should better define what a "murder." In fact what do you really know your question so difficult?

An abortion is "murder of a man but not an embryo: an entity resembling a strawberry that has no independent life. A baby breathes, smiles, participates in its own way to human life. Second difference: The embryo is a part of the body of the mother. It's still up to her "his belly". Third difference: The mother is participating in a network of relationships and responsibilities far greater than that of the embryo. Her Life has a preponderance over that of the embryo. A death is a death but all the deaths were not the same psychological weight. An abortion is always a pain and trauma but obvious question is where is the "least evil ", the" least suffering ". The suffering of a woman who can not bear the idea of taking a child takes precedence over" souffreance (?) of an embryo.

the mother may abort the fetus if ONLY endangers her life or it would be premeditated murder. I like the philosophy of my neighbors above that justify abortion just to avoid liability to have a future baby to be conceived is jostling to become responsible and it sneaks! @ V For: Go! very good question you ask is, I admit that it is not easy to keep a baby after being raped, but I confess that do not know the view of my religion in such cases. Good question!

Human life must be respected whatever their stage of development from egg to the extreme age

earlier question .. I already answered you're a guy, leaves women a choice. the day your sister will break the day … or your wife will wait for a child with serious birth defect or disease rendering it non-viable …. will stop at the prudishness

abortion is a crime!

Frankly, you'd better not meddle with what you watch, and stop with all your "issues" anti-abortion that are used strictly for nothing .. wind is all that! legal abortion or not has always existed, and it's not that kind of talk to the jerk who will change anything .. Women are masters of their body, whether you like it or not, and the risk of disappointing you, there was no justification for anything! What do you think it's really the least of our worries …

It's terrible to see people speak of a living being growing at a phenomenal rate to become a child as a vulgar piece of gadget that is available as desired! Where is the will of the child in an abortion? Where is the right of the unborn child and live? Abortion not dispose of his body, have another one who can not pronounce. Of course it's terrible as a gesture for those women who went into action, it is with a heavy heart she did so, the fear directs, and this often causes irreparable injury! Frankly, it's time to ask if he had not been better for these women to keep the child rather than abort. I remind you that the deadline for abortion varies by country! Abortion is legal in two months in France 5 months in other countries. Have you ever seen the echoes and the child in the womb at 2,3,5,6 months? Well, in one case we are talking about children, and in another a gadget to remove annoying! It is completely. Have you ever seen the echoes and the child in the womb at 2,3,5,6 months? Well, in one case we are talking about children, and in another a gadget to remove annoying! It complètementhypocrite. Abortion is not a solution and millions of lives are suppressed for years under the pretext of freedom of women. I am a woman and it disgusts me to see such arguments! Abortion is source of problems, suffering, trauma, and made women believe that it will solve their problem. And precision: the abortions after rape are a tiny minority, it does not even represent 1%.

So if I understand correctly, you consider the embryo as a cluster of cells. But in this case, you are too! You too are composed of cells connected together, each having a specific role. The embryo also. You and him are not "clump of cells" but a living organism. I have thousands of arguments proving that life begins not at birth, but the encounter between an egg and sperm, that magic moment when the draft begins life: already, the child has his own agenda genetics. The body sends messages to prepare for this newcomer. Another argument, the dependence of this Peita man to his mother. But an infant is it not as dependent as he? And you, resist you naked without food in Antarctica? No. We all depend. And kill the weak is a crime, cowardice. MISUNDERSTOOD LIFE IS NOT A FORCE!

@ AL infanticide is tolerated and encouraged to voluntarily depopulate the country is not .. ….. @ Titeva: if you count the number of babies who are gjetésà the trash in France alone is amazing and I repeat harbinger of DECADENCE admittedly point! This society is dying! We must collectively get out of this situation imposes on us all and takes us for guinea pigs to experiment with social models. I love the old France with good customs and habits must include the above to address this neglect pretext of modernity, it does not brutalize people in reality more to control them at will! @ Titeve: What you want to deny that most abortions are not for frivolous reasons! And why the authors they fall directly into a depression? because it's against nature! @ Yes the mother document: the woman's body is free! But the baby is free of his life too! That victory total pessimism about courage! it does not lead away

No, it's less traumatic for the family that infanticide after birth. But adoption is probably preferable.

For that matter, you just have to say it's a pleasure to have an abortion, right?

No. it's just an attempt to legalize an act which comes under particular case to be decided and can not be generalized in any way. The decadence is not yet properly punish rape and still find idiots who condemn such cases the poor woman! @ Sonnen, would hold the same about you if your daughter was raped by a handful of Africans? Would hold the same about you if we tell you that the gestate for your wife is a very high risk for it? Would hold the same about you if we tell you that your child was born with Down syndrome? you see we must not generalize. I am 100% ok with you on abortions linked to the irresponsibility of the parents, but there are specific cases or it may be desirable to avoid the hell was the mother …. Docu @ The mother, I'm ok but there are ways cnotraceptifs for this and for a people who called intelligent as you say, we must punish the irresponsibility of parents and no longer tolerate the abortions that would really be able evite .. we talk about taking the life a fetus, anyway ..

You're right. Like chemotherapy, vaccination and medical research in general which seeks to replace God. I say we need to let nature, eh: to abandon the baby on the steps of churches, let people die of tuberculosis and, as in Japan or Peru in the heyday, women forcibly sterilized after first child. Breeze laugh darling!

Wish for once we agree. It is a crime. And even a crime against humanity: they kill the innocent. I know nothing more infamous. @ Titeva: In case you quote ok. But honestly most abortions are for convenience, for financial reasons. It kills 200,000 babies a year, not everyone with Down syndrome, resulting from rape or endangering the life of the mother. The fanatics we speak of abortion as a right, then it should be a unique resort in extreme situations

you prefer some give birth to unwanted children? So later blows, unhappy childhood because unwanted, possibly infanticide – not for certain is better not to put children in the world in certain conditions!

the woman is free of his body he just has to see the South, laying unrestrained, forming cohorts of unemployed who come to invade us they have nothing to nourish educate or care for their flock, it slows the developement of their "country" causing appalling infant mortality ds Northern societies or births are desired, families are consistent, children covered all the intelligence of the world comes from these companies elsewhere rabbits illiterate prepares tomorrow Europe, energy, communications, etc. … no decadence, decadence were the South who regress, Principall africa and central asia @ titeva's true, it never ceases to astound, despite the pill, condom and all campaigns info, the numbers of abortion does not decrease the Spanish and Portuguese represent the bulk of the quota (medics), and the average age is isolation, youth become responsible (as the Clopper, belt Safety ….)

Each case is unique … Now when abortion becomes a means of contraception, there is a problem I ca …

Abortion is an individual choice, everyone makes choices and takes it as an adult vaccination prevents many misfortunes, will see the country side or the abortion is subject to no law: the drama, decadence, and inhumanity are master

Women (and guys, obviously) fought for decades for that motherhood is a choice, happiness, and never a curse. While shit reactionary bigots and challenge the laws on abortion tends to annoy me …. seriously