in fact they have simply obeyed what Jesus had told them: (Matthew 24:15-21) 15 "Whenever you'll see the disgusting thing that causes desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, standing in a holy place ( that the reader has his discernment), 16 then let those in Judea begin fleeing to the mountains. 17 That the man on the roof terrace not come down to take the property he is in his house, 18 and that the man in the field not return home to take his garment . 19 Woe to pregnant women and those who give suck in those days! 20 Pray without ceasing for your flight be not in winter or the Sabbath, 21 for then there will be great tribulation such as there has not been since the beginning of the world until now, no, there will be more [...] He commend these verses are valid for our time? what He commend those who think that only allow them to escape their justice, not He commend err.] He commend these verses are valid for our time? What He commend those who think that only they will allow them to escape justice, does t'ilpas wrong? @ Kelodace fear is when these things will start to happen and you will not be ready …

Yes! This is not because we seek on a platform that can be saved. must therefore adopt the platform-search

beware of the filthy thing! fear the wrath of the lord all these prophetic signs allegedly incite fear that this is your religion?

It must train, because even when there is a risk that the building collapsed, was evacuated the premises without consulting the people and they should leave everything as a precaution. I've seen cases of people who have saved their lives "fleeing" in evacuating, but have never been recovered or their papers, or their furniture or their clothes as "Prefect". It saves her life and lose everything else, so far not become materialistic or attach to property on that land. Save his life and soul are much more important, finally, no one can save his soul, but only hope not to lose it and that God will save.

Because Jesus had warned as you listed (Matthew 24:15-21) 15 "Whenever you'll see the disgusting thing that causes desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, standing in a holy place (the reader has discernment), 16 then let those in Judea begin fleeing to the mountains. In 66 AD the city was sacked by the Roman soldiers Cestus Gallus, and about 8400 people were massacred, according to testimony Flavius Josephus. we do not know why, Cestus Gallus had the city in hand and even the wall of the temple have been undermined at a stroke the Romans did an about face and are removed from the town they were pursued by zealots killing stragglers A Mint was minted to the victory of Jerusalem, but not for long, Christians have understood that they had to flee to the mountains

These were Christians need discernment and spiritual perception sharpened to understand the meaning of events and flee. However, some had become "hard of hearing" – or "lazy to listen" by Darby Bible. Christians must be prepared to make sacrifices and be determined not to be distracted by material possessions. To obey Christ's command, they should be willing to 'say goodbye to their property. "Those who have obeyed immediately and fled across the Jordan have been spared. For our part, we living when the prophecy of Jesus knows its final fulfillment. This means that "the great day of Jehovah" that day which saw the destruction of the system of Satan, "is close". it is more vital than ever to preserve our spiritual vitality and keep us awake. The Christian maturity we will never forget where we are in the course of time.

@ Kelodace I want to answer this from the Apostle Paul because if it is fear for sure is happy for others who will heed the warning and "flee". It's your turn this fear into joy! When Paul wrote his second letter to the Corinthians in 55 AD, he used the triumphal procession in an illustration. He said: "But thanks be to God who always made takes us into a triumphal procession in Christ's company, and through us, everywhere, makes evident the fragrance of His knowledge! That we are to God a sweet savor of Christ among those who are being saved and among those who are perishing, for they emanated a smell of death to death, for those is an odor emanating from life to life. "- 2 Corinthians 2:14-16.

I mean when someone is against abortion is that he believes that to kill an embryo that is a future living. But the fruits are protective coverings seeds are plant embryos … hence my question! @ Larry: well yes … in advance, since the sperm is only half of a future embryo … half I can not count … But the seed is truly a future person … @ tern: I see no problem to eat fruit and I do not see an abortion if I had to do … But I asked myself this question because anti-abortion stickers pasted in my neighborhood where there are marked embryo = life or something like that …

-What were the first plants cultivated? It is generally believed that these are cereals, collected and then cultured in the Middle East for more than twelve thousand years, but it is possible that forms of horticulture as the cultivation of yams and Taron in New Guinea are as or more old .. Thanks

In this case, is that anti abortion people have the right to masturbate?

Good evening, following your logic, so you consider a plant and a man in the same way is that? Personally, I have absolutely no qualms about eating fruit or meat or fish … can also be anti-abortion without being asked lots of questions about the nature or absence of a living embryo : there are many other arguments pro-life … starting with the physical and psychological effects on the woman who aborts. But that is not talked too much, alas. You will find full information on this and on abortion in general, please visit www.ivg.net, which is a non-denominational site and that this objective abortion in its true light. good thinking, and eat fruit serenely Sterne

@ Larry: No, if abortion is murder, masturbation is a genocide.

"There will be in your country or woman who aborts or barren. I will fulfill the number of thy days." Exodus 23-26 How do you explain that so many people find it normal that it is possible to eliminate a future living defenseless?

Because France is a secular country. Now, to each according to his convictions.

countries are governed by secular laws, not religious !…….. then abortion is allowed for those who wish …… and this is no obligation! if your religious beliefs prohibit you, you do not do it ….

It is the Jewish Bible is not for you! Christians do not respect any of these Ten Commandments command

"Neither woman who aborts" is the promise that the pregnancy of women happens correctly, and there will be no miscarriages. The next verse, which speaks of infertility (which can also be that women, as we note in the minds of the editors) do not leave doubt as to the meaning of the verse … if you really want to think about it of course! The issue of CHOICE of abortion by the pregnant woman does not arise at the time, so it is unnecessary to examine a text on topics which do not concern him.

bah since France is a secular country ..

Open your eyes to understand what I say, God said in his speech that the man became a living soul, he becomes can not be, because it was one thing, when he has to breathe, he became a soul vivant.tant that the fetus does not breathe, it's a chose.Et all the sperm we throw in nature, that said – you? ago I bcp causes abortions. But it does not become a habit, otherwise health problem and both sterilization

since the woman has to work like a man, and if she wants to have a career "normal" it better not fall into blisters and then from "sexual liberation".

hello, religion has risen to second place, and even is pushed even further lol! everyone decides according to his conscience and his religious beliefs!

But it simply Kriss. Because the principle in Exodus is a religious principle which seeks believers who want to stay upright in relation to this commandment. For others, they are doing with their conscience or they do not belief. And then You know it must learn that every situation is different. No doubt believing women they have resorted to abortion when they were desperate. Why were always men who are most severe, a child is two.

And yet women infertile there a. What you do with them? They were expelled for failing in their duty of fertility because the Bible "forbids infertility?

Because the woman has freely of his body (that means she does what she wants with it) and if it does not suit some tainted, we do not give a damn.

Because a woman does what she wants from her womb and that it is neither the Bible nor the idiots who decide to read it in its place.

When we wrote the book of Exodus, as he is quoted, no voluntary abortion, the woman who miscarried (as they said) was a miscarriage. Failure in a society where fertility of women was considered a blessing. Now today, abortion is a woman for a failure in relation to its ability to give life, that is why it is not desirable. But as France is a secular country, should have the choice not to risk his life. For the father of 2 girls I am an abortion would also mean a failure of conjugal life, because for me the spouse is interested Contraceptive problems of his wife who must not only burden. Porter only problem is the cause of "glitch" (you know what I mean).

This is because there are too sterile women so it's not too country of which he speaks, then suddenly it is too much of women who abort.

Secularism take a dictionary and look for the definition

Since you are pro-abortion, your parents should have aborted you!

Well, Twat. I am neither pro-abortion or anti. What a woman wants to make her stomach is not mine and not to YOU to decide. Occcupes up your ass.

Strange behavior

Perhaps it is better not to have been rather than having had a rough life …

But my parents wanted a child, head of con! Nobody wants to make abortion mandatory ….

You do not even know what an abortion potato. A true abortion, not a propaganda film obscurantist.

we entrust you all children of abortion = Vrait you tell us your impression in a year ok

Catholics are against abortion, but when a girl is pregnant at 14 years as a result of rape, he is thinking!

When you see the bunch of idiots who roam the earth, I wonder if you have no reason for me … I am for the right of women to control their bodies and their lives … 1'Um1

Here, you have included: being pro-abortion means trying to force all pregnant women to abort. It is curious, the term "con as an oyster" comes suddenly to mind …

These are not parents who have abortions, but only women. For my part, I am happy to be wanted and I thank my mother. And yours, of mother she regrets?

One may prefer to have a nation of weak http://www.consang.net/index.php/Global_prevalence

Hi, oyster!

Everyone has a brain, is not to say that people like you use it. It's the same here, not because all women have the right to do what they want their body (it does not concern you), including abortion, they abort for each child.

In all cases your parents to you, they should not be "pro-avortment "…. shame.

Ah ah ah ah ah … you have almost succeeded, I was on the verge of choking with laughter about this issue.

Great argument … away as others?

Rationalization of health, hospital consolidation, economies of scale regardless of the terms used, the result is there, the Centers voluntary interruption of pregnancy (CIVG) closing one after another. A challenge in practice, the right to abortion. pension five years. Blowing out the candles on the Veil law, so dearly bought, would be inappropriate today. The wax melted, leaving the right to abortion a bitter taste. For if the "pro-life" are still there, witnessed the event Parisian anti-abortion this Sunday, they are not the most feared. A look at the news and health policy point the main danger for the right to abortion: those are the choice but which do not afford that right applies. Tenon, Rostand and Broussais have closed their doors. Avicenna and San Antonio are suspended. The abortion centers in Paris experiencing difficult times. The cause? Hospital policy has entered a phase of rationalization. The cause? Hospital policy has entered a phase rationalisationéconomique for "greater efficiency and better provision of care" to provide the heart health ministry and the AP-HP (Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris). The financial logic pushes reunification. That abortion centers are the first affected is not surprising. A surgical abortion is priced 300 euros cons 3 times more for a miscarriage. Both acts, however, similar techniques are: same equipment, same staff …

The number of abortions decrease in France. is due to better information on contraception. By the time cons to consult on a possible abortion is always the same. There is no case counts of abandonment of abortion due to the excess of time allowed to do so by the fault a health facility that would have been crowded. Your question is purely demagogic.

The regression of women's rights is a step backwards for all mankind. It is important to every man … any male … that women can fully dispose of their bodies. Capitalism always attacks first the weakest. Latches are illustrated as all women who use abortion is a weakness … both physical and psychological, which has already met a woman happy to have an abortion? Nothing is ever gained. If women do not fight today to preserve what they have inherited from previous generations … they will pay the consequences bitterly! In a democracy … it never gets that for which they fight! If I remember correctly … Law Veil mission was to save women from death during illegal abortions because of surgical risks. This law would exist because of a big, huge moral issue and contraception … a little man master of his wife is a hen in that distant time. The world has changed enormously. Huge taboos. Huge tabousexistent again and again in our old country. Sex education …. true … not that of my old teachers of yesteryear is sorely lacking.

Abortion and immigration settlement Their purpose is apolitical. But why not make the connection with the concurrent action taken next year? In 1976, our leaders choose to offset the demographic decline that has accelerated after the Veil law, a settler immigration by allowing family reunification . The same logic of substitution is at work today in countries with a Catholic tradition, where the birth rate collapsed while the number of abortions increased from year to year like other politicians their time, Romano Prodi and Jose Luis Zapatero prefer mass regularization and migration flows they support, rather than listening to the proposals of the defenders of life and family as too reactionary

and you think it's because of who and what, the ladies of Italy and of Spain have chosen to have fewer children? before judging the men of "reactionary" you'd better d ' be somewhat less con

No, but imagine that you're beautiful? Look at your head, except goats, I do not see what you can kiss. @ Mata Hari: no need for a photo, I have my yahoo icon that represents me perfectly.

Your reasoning makes sense but please, do not equate abortion with genocide, just for that, I regret the star that is how we tend to stick to beat! You will never stop giving them grain grinding is physiological or what? You hold the same respect that cathos fundamentalists linked together in front of abortion centers, I had already noticed the ambivalence of your comments. numis69 @: there are beautiful and ugly everywhere lol. Go is farting picture playboy.

You've had really not tired of asking stupid questions ….

Strange how about the fundamentalists of all kinds come together when it comes to women and their freedom to dispose of their bodies as they see fit …..

Since we began to be too many on this planet, it is certain that we had a good solution to curb the birth rate (I am not talking about abortion mas contraception and women's liberation) . Otherwise the kids in Africa starving it does not bother you too much to say shit? Besides if we rely on the young to pay us our pensions, we can perhaps take 50 years, but apparently it doesn ' is not on the agenda … What's wrong …

FTG anything to see?

Oh my opinion Ricard this afternoon was not halal!

're sure your paper does not spain.

Being opposed to abortion is one thing but comparing abortion to genocide – to explain the phenomenon of immigration – is the senior psychiatry – you do there that remark rather clumsy women's freedom and their bodies –

Your question does not concern me because it asks immigrants. But allow me to add my eye to tell you that there is a reality in the depths of your questions, and I think this question courageous. France makes choices that will fit into the primary economic … Putting women behind boxes of super-markets all day for less than the minimum wage, then they give their offspring to keep half their salary! The French company, the mine is in irreversible drifts … Even under the insults of nationalistic pride to two bullets, one has the right to say "Thank you for your response.

What you said makes sense.

We agree.

Smelly!

What is strange is that the birth rate in France is the highest in Europe, and it does not prevent prospective immigrants to rush … Oh my God, I almost said "sweep" … How awful! There's a defect.

Too bad your mother did not know the abortion!

yes and then you're the butcher of women? you would like us to fill your seed and leave us in misery? too bad if the rate of brats like you suffer all their lives? science has given us the abortion so that our stomachs do are the seed of the man that we love. advocates of life? or rather breeding? no soul, no morals, no feelings. what do you mean it 'continue REPRODUCTION satisfies first the financial world and the world of religion or Faignasse can guarantee a good job in the piailliant money to the poor. the abominable man on earth, lazy, soulless, heartless, ruthless.'ll be preaching to animaux.les women are not your slaves. FAIS TOI Castres and the abortion will no longer exist.

If we had given sufficient allocations for the french can make children and raise their kids with dignity, there would be no need today to all allowances for all cockroaches multi anyone "!

Anything! The Veil law has no accelerated decline in population and the number of abortions has been stable for years and no increase at all. The legalization of abortion has not "created" the fact of 'in practice, there were already (illegal and dangerous) and there always will be … like it to reactionary macho or not.