Early Signs of Pregnancy» For Or Against Science?

For Or Against Science?

Tuesday, February 22nd, 2011

these men and women who seek, pretend to dictate to the world what to do, under the pretext that they are "experts" who are dedicated to their disciplines, have made experiments verify their theories, and that serious problems facing our planet! ! as if we could not manage his own crisis, thanks to men elected because "they have a bright smile and lots of money, as we've always done! c is really no matter what! they also invade our schools to divert our children the right path by teaching them that the earth is round, that man is an animal and making them learn the physical laws rather than divine! our children do not fear us anymore! we can not even whip them or leave them in the cellar for several days without the "experts" come to us and we take the threat of jail! c formerly was better when a child had the chance to spend special time with a priest, nobody complained, and the child learned life today is no longer respected the priests orcorporal punishment that they inflicted on our children, it's a world anyway! we must also accept abortion, contrary al divine love, rather than chasing the doctors or kill sinful adonnent sy! it is not too late to divert science …. Judgement Day is coming soon! Repentance! Repentance!

I'm all for science and spirituality.

I'm all for spirituality that does not exclude science

pros and cons at the same time!

I'm speechless ….. The land would not be round, the man would not be an animal (a plant then, or a mineral ?)…… "When a child had the chance to spend special time with a priest, nobody complained, and the child learned life" Yes, it made him much pain in the ass. "Judgement Day is coming soon! Repentance! Repentance!" It's been 2000 years that you expect the end of the world. So okay, we still have time … Do not worry about us. I vote for the best joke of the year.

for …… it does not contradict the Bible

You have to be stupid enough to put it that way! You stayed stuck in the middle ages?

Science is a tool to explain how creation. Spirituality explains the origin of creation. The two put together give a world view quite interesting:)

The trouble is that many scientists are also believers. This would be much easier if it was a bunch of pagans who spread such theories ungodly. They could be walled alive without scruple, but that's more difficult. The easiest way would be to use this science blasphemous one last time to cause the Last Judgement, they grow thanks to viruses and bombs they have invented. It would save the work to God and to their creator once these scientists would heretics less malignant.

Some do not understood your irony … By cons in the responses it's funny how some try to reassure themselves by adding that the Bible or spirituality does not contradict science … Well, if science contradicts all these fantasies, he must stop putting the tongs when we speak of religion: the supposed holy books are not of good moral: If you remove all that was borrowed from the Greek philosophers or Chinese, there is any foul thoughts of man: superiority of man on women, tolerance or regulation of slavery, incitement to murder or torture of those who think differently … it does no good to ignore it, things like that there are marked, and remarked in books. Religions, contrary to what implies the root word, do not collect peoples, but them away and make them fight each other. That ladies and gentlemen fundamentalists who did not like that we say these truths about your religion, go ahead with your thumbs down,. That ladies and gentlemen fundamentalists who did not like that we say these truths about your religion, go ahead with your thumbs down, if only for it to do you good, I am delighted

For Science was the twin of religion! she never had no longer be present in the West speak of God in scientific circles is really single out ….. This attitude has implications for all young minds who receive our university courses including A + Muslims

I agree with you my brother TDJ. As a very good indicator of Jehovah, I am well on the science-HAND! I would add, that it is primarily as a man close to me (and my imagination and my stupidity) I answered: against science. No, but look at what led us to the science! _ Knowledge _ The standard of living improve freedom _ _ _ Respect The development … No, but there are at least a single thing good for our God (glory to him)? Unfortunately for him: no. Pfff, science is the excrement of Satanta, because it's not good for our trooooop sect! I'm totally with you 200% my brother! As I assume that if you do not try you can not know (eg if you do not skydive without a parachute, you do not know what that mean and what it will do!) Land n is not necessarily round, because when I dig in my garden I fall on the Chinese, but the Sewer … And everyone knows that the essence of man is. And everyone knows that the man's own c'estd'être an inbred: So Adam and Eve are our single parent! And not forgetting that girl who made it violently raped by a mad absolutely must keep the child from mad if she does not suffer eternally in hell for not pretend to have to kill a cell that amat one is humorously as a child may be able to believe after our scams … heuu our beliefs! (By cons, to paradise … if you could give me your place … not because as I am a loyal feeling, I'm not about to have my ticket from the 144 000 …) And you know how to make people believe that science is wrong? _ You conflates "intent and knowledge" from the use of science and "usefulness" of science! You see, if people are stupid, they will fall into the trap, and we will follow it, ha ha ha!

Tags: Abortion, California Public Benefit, Disclosure, diversity of life, download, general public, here to see, Left-click, objective, Official Home Page, physical evidence, Public Benefit Corporation, Right-click, science, the origin, Topical Index, two-minute, video
Posted in Abortion | No Comments »

Es Is A Quack Doctor Can Decide For Me What Will Be Good For Us Or Not?

Tuesday, October 19th, 2010

… I recommend the solution of abortion! it's new! laughter

Djoe amazing lol

Your wife does not take birth control?

LoL you're seriously? I doubt it: / with all these issues: / / /

And you will see a quack doctor?? MDR

It's a good doctor if it preserves the life that ziziteur irresponsible charlatan of bistouquette do not want to assume!

Tags: quack, Abortion, Christopher Maloney, claim, doctor, duck, elderberry, Maine, Maloney, medicine, Michael Hawkins, Myers, Naturopathic doctors, patients, PZ Myers, Quack, science, Shut Down, Wordpress
Posted in Abortion | No Comments »

How Not To Breastfeed?

Thursday, March 4th, 2010

Hello, I would like to begin by saying that this is a neutral question, not opening the debate for or against breastfeeding. I am not looking for propaganda or persuasion, I would just simply a factual answer. I think there are a lot of breastfeeding information (internet, books, etc.), but it is difficult see, for me, impossible to find out what happens when a woman makes the choice / can not breastfeed her baby. I heard there is a medical need to start a few weeks before childbirth to stop producing milk. Is this true? Is there someone who can explain how not to breastfeed? PS Please do not tell me to ask this question to my gynecologist – I just go there and I will not make another appointment, nor the call, just for that. PPS I know this is a controversial topic, so I repeat: This is a neutral question, not opening the debate for or against breastfeeding. I am not looking for propaganda or. I am not looking for propaganda or by persuading, I would just simply a factual answer. Thanks.

Yes, there is actually a treatment to be taken to prevent, stop the flow of milk. No emergency, you will pay it at the time of delivery. Breastfeed or not is a personal choice, I do not see where is the controversy.

I did not breastfeed. I got tablets from birth to halt the flow of milk. If I remember correctly, I even took me several postpartum.

If you do not want to breastfeed your baby after delivery you must take pills to cut your milk.

how can you not want to start a deba with your question?? my case I 3semaines fight with my son who prefer to starve rather than to latch on! That is my answer!! ago after the nipple that does not allow breastfeeding is my aunt who is in case! y'en then have to indecsent c which is an object of pleasure and therefore finds that this falls of incest (a colleague of mine!) if not in my culture you must give at least 2 years in so I will not say the criticism that j'me takes in the mouth! voila I think I said everything!

my personal case: I tried feeding the first 4 days following the birth of my son. I had a very long labor and difficult (27h), and followed a s'ne pos natal depression since the 3rd day. at the end of 4th day, still no rise in milk (and yet I was taking pills and made me accelerate the movement by an electric shooter (nothing glamorous ..)). I gave up at the end of the 4th day, reluctantly, but relieved to pass the bib. at that time I had treatment to prevent the rise of milk and stop lactation. priori therefore, it will be post delivery you'll get that treatment.

There are drugs if you do not breastfeed at all, if you only want to stop almost immediately, the ideal is to offer the bottle to the baby as it flows more easily most babies lose interest quickly womb.

You're part of your desire not to breastfeed motherhood just after childbirth we will give adequate treatment to stop the flow of milk. This treatment is not given ahead of delivery since the rise of milk is done once the child is born. There is no decision to wear now breastfeed or not is a choice. I breastfed because I wanted my sister has totally refused breastfeeding. Whatever your choice, it will be good for your child.

There is a medoc to be taken after childbirth to stop the flow of milk

Yes it gives you a good Medoc but even when I had a little milk for a few tps

http://www.natur-enfant.com/produit.php?ref=105-11&id_rubrique=20

I unfortunately left breast that after 3 days and I had a stamp to take 2-3 a day for 15d.

Women do not wish to breastfeed take medication to stop the flow of milk. I am unable to say how long it should take, but I am almost certain that there is no precaution beforehand. Normally, anyway, if baby is not feeding, you should not have mounted milk or longer. However, as each woman is unique, I imagine that the drug is used to eliminate bottlenecks in the case of a woman who is not breastfeeding and still produce milk.

I have not breastfed have been compressed to motherhood (bromokin) for 15 days and then resumed pill. there is nothing to be done before the birth of my knowledge. cons by avoiding over-stretching your nipples to From the 7th month of pregnancy it seems that it promotes the flow of milk, a cousin dixit

Tags: babies, breastfed infants, Breastfeeding, breastmilk, Cost savings, formula, formula companies, IBCLC, infant formula, infants, mother, ounce cans, product, Recall, reduction, risk, science, women
Posted in Breastfeeding | No Comments »

Creationism: A Political Fight For A Theocracy?

Friday, February 19th, 2010

Let's be clear. Whether they admit it or not evolution, biology has never interested creationists. Science, they would swing. The only thing that matters to them is to reintroduce transcendence in the living world, connecting again with the supernatural natural for us to believe that descends from heaven and that religion is science . And then, hunt chance to give the creature a mission and duties to his Creator, highlighting the Bible or the Koran of mothballs to teach children what is good or evil, a morality that says "natural "course with the label of science. You think I exaggerate? No, the ultimate challenge and unacknowledged these religious fanatics is to moralize society to condemn condoms, sex, abortion, homosexuality and AIDS applaud.

lol

Frankly, you handle well the irony (BUT I'm not saying this in favor of Darwinian fundamentalist atheists like Dawkins!)

Creationists are idiots. Mankind can not know more than the con creationist.

well they are wrong because obscurantism of transcendence and transcendence are not specifically set

"Whether they admit it or not evolution, biology has never interested creationists. Science, they would swing" ==> So when you're not interested in a subject, it closes its mouth above ! THANK YOU!

You included. One question remains: Creationists and proponents of "intelligent design" did they really choose to be? Absence of relevant arguments, creationists cite in particular the "arguments": – The science dealing with the how, the religion of reason. The error is therefore not – impossible to reproduce experimentally the evolutionary processes that took place millions of years. And for good reason! It is obviously impossible to test! – The lack of evolution of species such as turtles or lizards. Yet it is normal if the environment does not change. – Current gaps in science. There will inevitably always! – Rare fraud, unworthy of a true scientist, etc … Some even argue that this opportunism by professional scientists as evolutionists would refrain from criticizing evolutionism … Unless refuse to open their eyes, the evolution appears as a fact. It does not matter finally there was or not, micro or macroevolution, adaptations random mutation-positive or not, etc … Our ignorance desmécanismes bio-physico-chemical that led to the evolution of species still remain very partial . Like, for example, explaining the ability of neurons only human "producing" creative thinking and imagination, an ability that is also an undeniable fact, but enough already explained to spend a divine intervention. In my view, the fundamental question is: why creationists are they? In other words, they really chose to be why creationists, even scientists, they are obviously impervious to any argument Yet scientific and rational? The creationist belief follows, in my opinion, several factors: – First is the fact that we are unable at this level unless centennial of the influence we represent hundreds of millions 'years has had on the adaptation of species. – probably also because most people support evil imaginary metaphysical uncertainties that. – Probably also because most people support evil imaginary metaphysical uncertainties qu'onleur has taught and they need immediate and reassuring explanations. For believers, as stated by Evangelical Pastor Philip HUBINON: "If there was no creation, everything else falls apart! "… – Finally, and even more importantly, because of educational influences unconscious, even among scientists. Also prominent are they elsewhere, but also by pride and ignorance of "mechanisms" brain, they do not seem to have considered for a moment that their religious upbringing and their environment unilateral thinking may have had an influence on their emotional brain, with as a result of anesthesia at least part of their rational brain and therefore may be critical, when it comes to religion. So regardless of their intellect and intelligence. But is it possible explanatory hypotheses, they were definitely very partial to the origin and the frequent persistence of faith? There is obviously no question of wanting. But is it possible explanatory hypotheses, they were definitely very partial to the origin and the frequent persistence of faith? There is obviously no question of vouloirsimplifier or reduce the extraordinary complexity and richness of the human psyche, and especially the phenomenon of religion, to "mechanisms" psycho-neuro-physio-genetic-cognitive learning. However, this new approach is already in my eyes, the relative share of individual freedom. As stated by neurobiologist Henri Laborit: "(…) I am frightened by the automation that is possible to create unwittingly in the nervous system of a child. He must, in his adult life, a rare chance to be detached, if there ever comes .(…) You are not free of environment where you were born, or all that has introduced automation in your brain, and, finally, is an illusion, freedom! ". Finally, what matters is not so much that the EC we think, but

Tags: Abortion, bad science, Christian fundamentalists, crap, creationists, evolution, exempt, fundamentalist, mass movement, moon is made of cheese, nonsense, science, society, teach children, the lies, the normal, Theocracy, theology
Posted in Abortion | No Comments »

Why Do You Say That The Noble Prophet Muhammad Was A Monster Without A Heart?

Saturday, January 9th, 2010

(Ibn Sad, Tabaqat 2/30-1). Then came the raid Umayr ibn Adi ibn al Kharashah Khatm cons Asma bint Marwan, of Banu Umayyah ibn Zayd, when he was five nights in the month of Ramadan in early nineteenth -ninth month of the Hijrah of the Apostle of Allah. Asma was the wife of Yazid Ibn Zayd ibn al Hisn Khatm. She used to denigrate Islam and offended the prophet pushing people against him. She composed poems. Umayr ibn Adi went to meet him at night, entered her home. Her children were sleeping around. There was even one hanging from her chest, she was nursing. He tried his hand because he was blind, and the child aside. He plunged his sword into his chest until he appears in the back. Then he made the morning prayer in Madinah with the Prophet. The apostle of Allah said: "Have you murdered daughter Marwan? He said: "Yes. Should I do anything? He said: "No. Two goats did not bump her. It is a formula that was heard for the first time. It is a formula that was heard for the first foisprovenant the apostle of Allah. The apostle of Allah called Umayr "seeing".

Who can talk about it, nobody knew!

What is your resource stp I'd like to see this book you speak

@ Azer a small video. Http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_XtYKN1CrYM

it happens like that? I do not know!

Transmission chain = low forged hadith.

I know it is useless, but I'll say a phrase in Arabic that you understand it right away: saou9imou 3alayka l7ouja addition, all scholars are agreed that it is an apocryphal hadith absolutely void Judges your master and mine, Mohamed salla Allah alayhi wasallam through hadith sahih (thou hast 300 000) on two books of Bukhari and Muslim (just an example) what you do is of laziness intelectuelle,:) is not very new from the Islamophobic.'ll now lhouja 9amete, as2alou Allah l3adaim raba l3archi l3adim year youkhayibaka fima katabta, 9abba7ak Allah 9abba7ak Allah 9abba7ak Allah Allahoma arina fihi 3ajaiba 9oudratik, Allahoma arina fihi 3ajaiba 9oudratik, Allahoma arina fihi 3ajaiba 9oudratik Amine, amine, amine.

Everyone knows that this hadith there is unreliable and rejected, being considered obsolete! But good anyway, it is expected that kind of stuff from you! I join my brother لا إله إلا الله "as2alou Allah l3adaim raba l3archi l3adim year youkhayibaka fima katabta, 9abba7ak Allah 9abba7ak Allah 9abba7ak Allah Allahoma arina fihi 3ajaiba 9oudratik, Allahoma arina fihi 3ajaiba 9oudratik, Allahoma arina fihi 3ajaiba 9oudratik Amine, amine, amine.

One day you'll answer to God for your slander on the prophet (SAW) and I pray God to witness against you, ONE DAY YOU WORRY VAS RESPOND TO YOU AND YOUR ZIONIST ACOLYTE

wait a little longer and a little more Hadiths are even lower … patience

What I like with the Muslims, is that it is against them or is out of context, it is low, it is a bad translation and it must speak Arabic, or if Do you speak Arabic and you criticize, you are a miscreant. In short, still slimy excuses for not assume t Can you give the transmission lines to true historians, even if it is true or false and compatible with the time? Anyway, we already have your Koran to show the violence of your sect, we need not say that this hadith is weak or not. Quite the contrary, everything had to happen but it is only low for the poor western swallows everything. We know the taquia, thank you

Related Blogs

Regarding Abortion …?

Tuesday, October 20th, 2009

There are more than two years, I have resorted to abortion (thank you not to judge the polemics and above) with the medicine … I was told that I was about three mois.Cependant, j I was able to recognize the sex of the child when I lost it and I understood that three months could not see. Y'a t there any exceptions? or we would have lied in hospital, seeing as I did in any case keep the child? I have a little hard to understand as it is … you know the case of such exceptions or persons to whom it was believed they were pregnant for less than it was? If so, I do not want the doctor because I have not changed my mind .. only d like to understand .. Please let me speak clearly because it is far from me, I AC does not suffer has been carefully noname: it is I who have seen JOLAVA: abortion is allowed up to 3 months and a half years since qq … Regarding my reaction, ben j 'got so bad and I was so relieved that this is over I have. For my reaction, well I was so wrong and I was so relieved because it's over I had n'aipas reaction … only qq time after that I told myself qq there something that was not right .. also, the conditions which abortion is bad enough, so I was glad to return to the house on the spot … but hey that's another story @ jojopic: absolutely nothing you've actually understood

is not possible for a 3months sex is not well formed even though he saw he could never tell if if was a girl or a boy

You'll have to ask an expert to get a real answer I think. In any case I also have j had an abortion, I know it is not easy but now you don t have the only

abortion over 3 months are not allowed so I look after it will have you hidden ca by cons we do not see the sex of the fetus has 4 or 5 months by ultrasound before because it is certainly unclear, but in aborting individual life experiences they have seen a small button or not the result was very clear

Abortion is normally forbidden to 3 months. Because I got pregnant at 16 and after the results of the blood test was told I could not abort because I was already three months. Well anyway, I wanted to keep it then the problem arose. Now for the sex of the baby, I knew at 5 months. I do not judge you at all but I'd like how you reacted when he saw that. You're obviously not obliged to answer. Biz It seems indeed that the conditions are deplorable. A friend has been treated like shit by a nurse …. I tell everyone his choice! It is sometimes better to have resorted to abortion when they do not feel ready!

some of my friends knew the sex of their child to echo the 1st quarter, but logically you to abort you had to be less than that. I read somewhere that at first sex was almost identical and resembled than a girl. Only later if it's a boy what looks like the clit, grows to become the penis.

Well, the sex determination begins at the seventh week of embryonic life. But impossible to distinguish anything because changes take place inside the body (become promitifs channels, developing testes / ovaries). In general, it is unrealistic to see any difference before the 16th week, and even a trained specialist can recognize the penis. In short, it may be that you had seen an "artifact" misinterpreted. For the duration of development is particularly stable within a species, especially mammals, because no variation in temperature is one of the few factors that can accelerate embryonal development.

the time of abortion in France is 12 weeks after conception. For the rest, Ludo you've responded very well.

Me personally I'm against the abortion but some women are not vriment ki no real choice say too jai go bankrupt by cete but too late because jen has been 3 months pregnant and my cete jointly ki do not want this baby but jen wanted this baby so much and today I do not regret keeping laundry every day I feel it move in months and I just say ke c extra

my son was detected sex 12 weeks, the nursing staff has probably wanted to do for you No es no regrets in identifying the sex you could have probably in their t imagine the little boy or girl that would summer and you would have had more trouble getting your grief

If you have an abortion by drugs, and in France, I think you should be too early in pregnancy so we can distinguish the sex of the embryo. With drugs, the latest 7 weeks is recommended, after it works so well. But perhaps you were in a trial period? And you can just make believe that less is pregnant but the echo of the first quarter is infallible date a pregnancy, about 3 days (at that age all embryos have the same size, is that after 15 weeks of growth differences appear) .. There are probably doctors who agree to exceed the limit, but it must be a few days, and in these cases, certainly not by drugs. I think you thought he recognized the child's sex, but between a large clitoris and a small penis, the difference at this age is difficult to understand, even for a specialist, because as you l 'said above, the age limit, sex is not externalized

3 months it has banned an abortion by medication is mandatory intervention, there is something unclear to the inside. when certain sex doctor has seen the 1st echo so it's possible that you ' 've seen.

No no you have not seen her sex in three months c is not possible, you saw something you believe to be her sex and in any case it does have lied to the hospital, they have no reason not to do that

Regarding the sex of the baby, it is true that the 2 are similar at the beginning as uun clit stretched penis) is one reason why the doc does not want sex said before the 2nd echo … in my case For my first daughter, we did know that the last echo, because supposedly he had a doubt … that says it probably means there was nothing to see! (it was just came across a jerk who blew when he was asked if we could know the sex!) For my second, it has the second echo! (we had changed location!) And on abortion, j 've suffered when I was 17 years, it was through "aspiration", not by Medoc for pregnancy too advanced, it forestay useless to try a pill that could fail … Talor, I doubt that the deadlines have changed since then, but I think it's still a little suspicious that I just tried the tablet while you were at 3 months (that's about to here that I was …)

The sex of the baby is already visible about 2 ½ months because he already has all its organs and thus his genitals … And actually the echo of the 12 th week (the compulsory first trimester) it is already possible to see the sex of the baby, but you do not certify the to100% due to the confusion is obviously possible. So I think you very well could see her sex … what's even more difficult for you. But it's the same, you will never be 100% secure

I wonder pourkoi you ask this quest, puiske com tell you t'enfous to have an abortion. So?!

I do not think they left t'aient abortion even if it was too late for that would be dangerous for you. By cons may be that the date of conception was miscalculated.

hello, regarding abortion I did 2 times in 2 years on the c drive but once you prefer that to subject what they will not have this baby has it I think it is impossible to see sex of the child is 3 months pregnant I rather think that your doctor knows that you wanted an abortion willed as disgusted as most good hope you get better good luck for the future

abortion by medication does is up to 5 weeks of pregnancy is not even 2 months and if not done by suction. then I ask myself about the purpose of your question! info and I knew the sex of my baby 2months and half of pregnancy! Finally at the hospital they do not lie on the term of pregnancy "and finally know that abortion is allowed up to 14 weeks gestation or 14 weeks after first day of last menstrual period or 12 weeks of pregnancy that is not 3 months! then again I am very concerned over your question, what is your goal? discredit abortion and the hospital teams that practice?? to panic and women who want abortions?

I agree with jojopic! go see her profile, she has about rasto to death and homophobic so why not against abortion …

Regarding Abortion …?

Thursday, October 15th, 2009