It is time someone stands and howls with anger against the force Unique Thought hampering freedom of expression in France since the coconut-UMPS-Gayssot Perben created their fatal act. As was a dissident in Soviet Soljenisyne. Indeed, for a word not stamped "Thinking Single", its watchdogs hang you in court. So this professor who has dared to present during the two versions differ on the subject of abortion: the pros with the thesis generously provided by the "authorities", the cons with an American movie that dares to expose the reality of abortion. Thus the word occupation that would prohibit it to mean that the streets of many cities in France are … employed and you are prohibited during prayers of Muslims. Thus the word invasion that you are prohibited to use to express your opinion about immigration that you feel much too large and ruinous to our country. Thus the word pig as contempt towards a. Thus the word pig as contempt towards unecertaine population if you cook, to the point that has banned the tasting by bums. Thus the word chastity that you can not use it without insulting you while you think that this "practice" would also be a means to fight against the spread of the scourge of AIDS. For anything you are treated fascist and named everything that was invented around phobia: xeno, gay, Jewish, Muslim, trans, whatever … yet You can not express your opinions without being threatened wrath of Justice. Is this going to last much longer? Does it rise one day a champion of freedom of expression, a French Solzhenitsyn who will proclaim his need for freedom at all, that comes to muzzle watchdog groups currently meeting in heavily subsidized by taxpayers? I do not see anyone yet. And you? Your opinion. Place to guard dogs. Yes, Serpinet. So soon he'll be disqualified from French: it starts with. So soon he'll be disqualified from French: it starts parvous laugh, treat you fascist, populist if you express that pride. Are you forbidden to discuss Frenchness, your roots, your culture and pharmacies called "anti-racist" (SOS-Machin, MRAP, LICRA …) you end up being "… phobe! And besides, "Europe" does everything for you to forget to be working to destroy the unity in our country: Brussels already paying directly through the regions above the French government! (Note that the WSPU in the dark Regionalization is to say, inequality and the fragmentation of decisions)

Finally, a person who yelled really, it's nice! agree with you, enough that we think if we say this: it means that, if we say this, it means, etc., etc. …

Person in sight! And I wonder if this person never emerged from the shadows, she would not "embastillée" for one reason or another, or even "the other world" for reasons of state? anyway, for my part, I opened a blog for my rants, I closed it as quickly for not flipping out against such injustice. No right to say what you think! No right to write what we think without being insulted by right-thinking souls … The majority has no right to speak, they are the minority (which abound) they have every right.

In 2007, an image of the Blessed Virgin Mary appears with a small fetus in Guadalupe, where she had already done a Miracle centuries ago (See Our Lady of Guadalupe) This miracle took place just after this place allows abortion . http://www.holybuzz.com/Miracle-a-ND-de-Guadalupe-en-Avril.html http://s1.e-monsite.com/2009/08/27/06/resize_250_250//74890206notre Dame-de-guadalupe-miracle1-jpg.jpg (TJ, as usual you are going to take this item on the Virgin Mary, but this time I will rest all day, and if it bothers you that much, on Miracles all I know, because the sectarian dictatorship, very little for me) How do you interpret this miracle of the Blessed Virgin Mary, who arrives just after the approval of abortion in this place that had always refused before?

We believe or you believe it! PS: I'm not TJ.

You really believe this kind of crap or it's the second level? ^ ^

Fake! Me I do not see a fetus I see a light.

It happened more precisely during the celebration of cassoulet, it can be interpreted as a sign of the return of sacred flatulence.

Any idiots could degrade this table

It's a premonition.

Pfff. Jute is a light. And it is oddly placed, your fetus. We must believe that the virgin's unfamiliar anatomy: the uterus is lower than that. Why the Virgin shows us she's stomach? ))

Is that the Virgin was aborted?

I believe God works miracles and clear but Mary, the mother of Jesus was also human and imperfect as you and me, I do not see how you can biblically justify any miraculous intervention of the latter. I'm always amazed how the Catholic belief in Mary is so much more physical manifestations of miracles and that God or even Jesus. Sometimes one wonders if you have not forgotten that through Christ we are saved and that healing is possible. My thinking is nothing bad, just that I do not understand how can believe in such power of Mary while expressing Christian (as Christian who says he is usually Bible and the Bible does not speak to Mary Power, on the contrary).

Bad play of light (there anyway way to get a much better picture than that these days … But it will reveal the deception, so better to take photos of poor quality and far …)

the real miracle is that it has become holier than 400 years after!

The interpretation is clear, it is one that defends life regardless of its stage. You know that those who are determined not to believe, to consider the supernatural illusions as individual or collective, will persevere in contempt or ridicule . But you're right to testify that what makes sense for you. A dead resurrect those who have decided to do without God continue to deny it for fear of losing an ounce of their pseudo-freedom. Those who know that Christ is victorious say by themselves: "some barking, but caravene happening," because nothing will stop Love.

http://www.bladi.net/forum/169864-baisse-demographique-algerie/ According to a census in 2004 Algeria had 36 million inhabitants, in 2008 it would count only 34 million inhabitants, so the Algerian indeed being young disparition.Les not marry because of the civil war, unemployment, poverty, the decline in traditional values and traditional solidarity, homes explode, prostitution is growing, AIDS and infanticide, abortions too. The Alcoholism and highway accidents are responsible for the carnage road, more hospitals have become real center of execution is valid between them there appears maimed or dead. Roads and bridges are unworthy of a country even under développé.Les young people commit suicide or drown in the Mediterranean as they try to escape this hell. There is the fact that the Government of Algeria refuses to grant free land to young people wishing to become a farmer or build a house in this country seven times larger than France.

Algerians are all in France and the latter has the best demographics in Europe!

2 million wild past in France, I thought they loved their country since 62 they are not independent?

The two million Algerians who you are missing home, but you can resume when you want

that good news! And we will not complain and during that time, the Chinese working

HIV testing is done more and more, on any occasion. And that's good.

The HIV test is NOT required. You always have the right to oppose thee. To those who do not understand my response, that is not value judgments but a response right point. It is better to know. But we can not force them to do. Mounette @ we have the right to object. Is this desirable? That is another question but in terms of LAW. We can say NO.

when you make a transaction which is what the surgeon requested the test, all blood tests done before surgery is completed with blood HIV test they do not want to take chances,

This must depend on the locations for me what I knew was that the test was that if the patient requests.

HIV treatment lies http://sidassassin.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!89BE0983FAC34C3E!226.entry

I know that folds behind the law to say at what point a fetus becomes a human being, preventing any recourse to abortion. But life is not a game, and abortion is an act that requires to assume all responsibilities and consequences! Which law should be preferred, that of becoming mother or the unborn child?

Abortion is not murder because it removes what is not a child. If you push the logic of anti-abortion to the absurd, a cyst, a nodule, tumor have a conscience and must not be removed. You see? Another argument: a child born in a home that does not want and can not afford to raise them. Where are his rights there? Better to live in these conditions or not living (knowing that a fetus aborted never lived) and what is the position of anti-abortion on children with severe disabilities? Better to let them vegetate all their life on a bed of bedridden or prevent all this suffering for the child and his family?

you mean "women become" since becoming a mother it means nothing!

This is not new, but personally I think the answer is personal in any case within the limits of French law. And then it must be a beginning, French law says that at 11 weeks seems far-fetched as saying that 2 cells is a human being, while a small piece of skin that I scratched it represents more.

This question is not "controversial", it just completely sterile. Whether or not allowed, there have always been women who aborted and there always will be … not worth discussing here over the centuries. The fact that it is legal just allows better supervision and avoid women maimed or dead on the kitchen table. If you do not want women have abortions, it is necessary that men do not make their one child per year there are more rapists, more incest, more accidents and more condom forget pill, the more difficult living and poverty, many men who once barred their pregnant girlfriend and more children with disabilities … provided that it is impossible and it will not happen! And think that women who abort do not light heart and do not find it harmless. And the law being who exists and has already living on the avails of course, what might become a person but is still nothing more than a tiny cluster of cells without conscience.

The miscarriage is spontaneous abortion, we must condemn the woman who made a manslaughter?

not abortion is not a crime legalized! is the free choice of every woman to have her body (why should they suffer unwanted pregnancy and all that goes with it then you guys have the opportunity lache to escape?)

The issue is not controversial and much less sterile, it is still today a major topic of bioethics and neuroscience. The debate is not always confined within the elite, contrary to what is commonly admitted. And the crux of the debate is a battle between teams of different embryologists and neuroscientists, philosophers, etc., etc. to find out from to be considered when the embryo as nervously active. The debate is very deep, much, much more than what is presented in "public." And here, on a general site we can see everybody reapply with a brutal response, single and without appeal: everyone thinks hold with certainty Truth. That is to say you got those who say NO this is not a CRME legalized and say that the question is stupid, and who did you say yes of course and break the other . It makes me laugh when I see that even eminent thinkers doubt and fail to give a clear answer. Basically, it is not a. Basically, we do not know of unpoint scientifically whether or not one can speak of "murder." Only responses "literary" of metaphysics and religious responses, and other atheists. Science has not yet responded. So for the moment we do not know. So stop being fundamentalist in your mind (yes endpoint, whether the endpoint and no discussion, because it's like that).

That all depends on your beliefs regarding the beginning of life: either it begins at birth, or it begins at conception. No, life is not a game, and it is precisely because I I have great respect for life, woman and child than I am for abortion. I'll explain my reasons. First, I know what it feels like not to have been a child desired. Your mother does everything to take care of you, but deep down she knows, and you feel it does not want your presence. To wipe the guilt she will overprotects, but love is something voluntary, not imposed, and it can not deceive, it becomes oppressive, guilt, and do not meet the real needs Child (protection needs among others). I return to what I said love, including breast, is not necessary. A woman who is "forced" by his entourage, law or morality it is necessary to keep a child she does not will not be a good mother, will not be able. A woman who is "forced" by his entourage, law or morality it is necessary to keep a child she does not will not be a good mother, will not be mesurede really love, protect, and help her child. It is a great suffering for the child, so he asked all his life what he doing there (sometimes prefer to die) and mother who lives plagued by guilt and sacrifice their free choice. Sometimes the mother and child, it is better that the child was born. Then you have the right to say that we must strive to avoid reaching that point, and I am quite d Okay. There are several solutions which all have a common starting point: learn to communicate about sexuality with young people (even if young people are not only concerned with abortion, but good information is still top for life) . They learn by example to say "no" to express their expectations, their understanding of the issues that are behind the sexual act (not to ban them because their bodies belong to them, but especially that they bear the consequences), and mostly importantly, they allow free access to contraception. We can not prevent others. We can not prevent autresde do what they want from their lives, however we can inform them about the consequences of their actions. The Netherlands are among countries where abortion is the easiest to access and yet it is less practiced in France: there, we did a lot of campaigns on contraception, it also communicates.

c is an act of conscience for the life of a fetus is a life "to hunt or fish does not eat what is killing the failure to protect in the sexual act using his body against nature with the risk of diseases such as AIDS polemic on life is a potential risk for those who seek the controversies the question is still Satan said that the man with his character has the free will to follow his tracks and just look at the result of the god of this world satan loves phylosophy for he has even try phylosophy with God being far more of human perfection MORALITY REMOTE s also increasing and everyone's accounts will join a cause that is identical to the self same Jesus said to desire a woman in his heart c est deja l adultery if you were to remove a life as a fetus in how your conscience to know the consequences for you and the mother> nobody will judge you because you will judge you even into your thoughts as to whether you will No excuse or accuse never forgetsSatan resurrects that does not risen Lord GOD make your choice it nya no 3 rd solutions

It appears to me difficult to consider that just as there are genetic individuality there is "life" and "conscience". Otherwise, all that actually kills us (viruses, bacteria, cancer …) should be preserved as part of their unique DNA, they are endowed with "conscience" and "life." The life according to religion and morality is sometimes preserved at the cost of the absurd. How many people suffering from incurable disease, conscious of their condition and kept alive only by machines or medicines have asked to die? That they were denied for many, the name of "life". But it is reasonable to ask "what life?" How far must we go through suffering to preserve the "life." Spontaneous abortion also exists, yet no one accuses the nature of "play with life "discarding an embryo unviable. If abortion is an ancient practice. I think that today it is best managed and most respectful. I think that today it is best managed and most respectueuxdes rights of everyone (It also seems to me that this number is decreasing, contrary to what some say). We avoid seeing women left to die after an abortion wild. This could become quite marginal, while some instead to advocate abstention or ignorance, saw sex education in a normal reality. It is Anyway, out of the question back on the right. Especially for the sake of people who do not hesitate to show disrespect or to kill human life, they have worked so hard to "save".

Already when we talk about abortion in France in any case, we called an embryo, no fetus, except in the last 2 weeks of the statutory period. Embryo is a person? A fetus of 12 weeks is there a ? Murder by definition is to kill a person. So the question, an embryo or a fetus under 12 weeks are these people? And even, what are the unborn? Should we mourn d an embryo? At this rate there, that women who miscarry mourn 1 year and not bury their embryos? It must be logical, since the embryo is a person … It takes insurance funeral of the first day of delayed menstruation? When does this on one person? Legally, from birth, not before The baby is a person, the embryo and fetus younger than 12 weeks are not a certainty … It is ideological and even scientific. The fact is, there is not A return above the limit, abortion is allowed up to birth, it seems, "anyway, from 22. The fact is, there's no going back over the limit, abortion is allowed up to birth, it seems, "anyway, from 22semaines, structures of nerve pain are in place, it must have a good sense not? " I would agree, but is not when talking about one of unborn child? When there is a parental project. An embryo frozen in nitrogen could ultimately be considered a person potentielle.un embryo who moves into the uterus of a woman on the pill who does not want is not a potential person … Allow abortion before 12 weeks of pregnancy, is not to deny the potential person in an embryo or a fetus under 12 weeks, since there is no obligation to do so, and since in the context of a parental project, the same embryo and fetus even if he violates is defensible. It's just a possibility for a woman who has no parental project, that's all. And this is not an obligation, without parental project she may choose to keep the pregnancy anyway. And think well that women who use it have good awareness of issues and consequences. To the question,. To the question, does favors on the right to become the mother or the unborn child, the answer is both my master, but it is becoming mother or unborn child if and only if there are project Parental … And this is what is done legally, and it has nothing to do with abortion A pregnant woman who does not want child is not becoming a mother, it's just a woman pregnant an embryo that is not the result of a parental project is not an unborn child, just an embryo. But there, in your last question you consciously use the terms pro-life, and this is certainly not for nothing …

a woman abortionist and adulterer in good conscience. 1942: The law makes abortion a crime against state security, punishable by death. In 1943, Marie-Louise Giraud was guillotined. A woman beheaded for example? Is the story of this woman that this movie tells Claude Chabrol in 1988 realized during the film in the fall, film-Mirama Montparnasse in Paris, the Catholic fundamentalist fanatics threw a tear gas grenade into the room, suffered a heart attack, a spectator died a few hours later. Do not hesitate to see or review this movie.

Yes the Vichy French government finally Nazi collaborator.

It is unclear where the issue is, but you make some useful contributions to knowledge of the Vichy regime. Marshal Petain had married late in life, a divorced woman whom he had apparently known in a brothel. It is among such people that recruits the great defenders of morality … (it is true that the Catholic Church broke the first marriage of Mrs. Petain with Mr. Dehérain, painter. Work, Family Homeland …)

Abortion has always been sentenced under the Old Regime an unmarried woman must declare her pregnancy very soon, there were laws about this, however there was no prosecution if the child was placed in a "tower" usually located in town, there were bearers of children who put them in a basket On the religious prohibition is added after the Great War and because of the massive bloodletting that had occurred, a particularly regressive legislation in this field radicals were the worst enemies of women however Petain to avoid both dramas and marital birth abortions introduced in X, saving the "honor" of the mother and child's life. It is particularly significant that the last woman had been beheaded for this reason

I saw the beautiful movie Chabrol.

Unfortunately the freezer n existed that time ….. I demand the immediate release of veronique Courgeau …. mdr

a woman abortionist and adulterer in good conscience. 1942: The law makes abortion a crime against state security, punishable by death. In 1943, Marie-Louise Giraud was guillotined. A woman beheaded for example? Is the story of this woman that this movie tells Claude Chabrol in 1988 realized during the film in the fall, film-Mirama Montparnasse in Paris, the Catholic fundamentalist fanatics threw a tear gas grenade into the room, suffered a heart attack, a spectator died a few hours later. Do not hesitate to see or review this movie. I admit I saw this movie recently, and this story from a real fact totally shocked me.

Well, it's crazy! I dug up a book on this very subject just yesterday afternoon! Thanks for the info otherwise!

The same people who argue for the "privacy" … are no longer a contradiction.

When you recommend a film, it is also put under … ,-p These d ' "Une affaire de femmes" de Chabrol so.

One of the "past"? It was the only woman to be guillotined for this reason: to have performed 27 abortions illegal. A man, Désiré Pioger, was also beheaded the same year of 1943 for performing illegal abortions 3. I guess the movie "forgets" to mention.

http://fr.news.yahoo.com/73/20090213/tfr-le-cong-maternit-dans-le-viseur-de-n-0e31ec3.html I did not believe him when Rachida had a flash back after childbirth as it would impact our lives as mother and mother-but it is the honcho still wanted to put his nose in our affairs and voila! Read the article! Http://fr.news.yahoo.com/73/20090213/tfr-le-cong-maternit-dans-le-viseur-de-n-0e31ec3.html evander @: it is true that 'can not blame him for being what he always was!

Bah what? Working more to earn more! This is what Sarkozy has said no? well it meets its commitments …

A woman may return to work 1 week after if they are like in the case of RD cad with infants who s'occuppent 24/24h her child. This will expand the childcare business as the U.S..

Roll on the next elections that change becomes president because it's great !!!!!! add anything: the parental leave that will shorten

you confuse maternity and parental leave.

there is no question of maternity leave (which may be extended to be in the EU average), but parental leave ….

It speaks of parental leave is leave taken by mothers or fathers by choice only, which everybody is concerned. Sarko does not affect the maternity leave, you must read an article properly before crying wolf.

I was always told "parental leave X weeks before pregnancy so …" For my answer, look at this yahoo question, I put it in "Law": http://fr.answers.yahoo .com / question / index; _ylt = AilVyuDYOILp2LJk6qXlzIErAgx.; _ylv = 3? qid = 20090213054719AA3bjUd

heu ben hop hop hop calm tata rachida have nothing to s'reprocher or Uncle SARKO see instead of quoting from aubry, Lolland, segolene, Fabius, mauroy, if you know what I want to say.

Related Blogs

• Evo's PC Gaming Blog » Blog Archive » Conversations on Russia …
• Who should fear Russia's new military doctrine? | ”RIA Novosti …
• Disney is aiming for a fairytale start in Russia – Financial Times …

http://fr.news.yahoo.com/73/20090213/tfr-le-cong-maternit-dans-le-viseur-de-n-0e31ec3.html I did not believe him when Rachida had a flash back after childbirth as it would impact our lives as mother and mother-but it is the honcho still wanted to put his nose in our affairs and voila! Read the article! Http://fr.news.yahoo.com/73/20090213/tfr-le-cong-maternit-dans-le-viseur-de-n-0e31ec3.html evander @: it is true that 'can not blame him for being what he always was!

Bah what? Working more to earn more! This is what Sarkozy has said no? well it meets its commitments …

A woman may return to work 1 week after if they are like in the case of RD cad with infants who s'occuppent 24/24h her child. This will expand the childcare business as the U.S..

Roll on the next elections that change becomes president because it's great !!!!!! add anything: the parental leave that will shorten

you confuse maternity and parental leave.

there is no question of maternity leave (which may be extended to be in the EU average), but parental leave ….

It speaks of parental leave is leave taken by mothers or fathers by choice only, which everybody is concerned. Sarko does not affect the maternity leave, you must read an article properly before crying wolf.

I was always told "parental leave X weeks before pregnancy so …" For my answer, look at this yahoo question, I put it in "Law": http://fr.answers.yahoo .com / question / index; _ylt = AilVyuDYOILp2LJk6qXlzIErAgx.; _ylv = 3? qid = 20090213054719AA3bjUd

heu ben hop hop hop calm tata rachida have nothing to s'reprocher or Uncle SARKO see instead of quoting from aubry, Lolland, segolene, Fabius, mauroy, if you know what I want to say.

Related Blogs

• So what was all the party conference fuss all about? « Campaigning …
• a party hat « Seven angels, four kids, one family
• The Stanford Review » Mausoleum Party Revived

http://fr.news.yahoo.com/73/20090213/tfr-le-cong-maternit-dans-le-viseur-de-n-0e31ec3.html I did not believe him when Rachida had a flash back after childbirth as it would impact our lives as mother and mother-but it is the honcho still wanted to put his nose in our affairs and voila! Read the article! Http://fr.news.yahoo.com/73/20090213/tfr-le-cong-maternit-dans-le-viseur-de-n-0e31ec3.html evander @: it is true that 'can not blame him for being what he always was!

Bah what? Working more to earn more! This is what Sarkozy has said no? well it meets its commitments …

A woman may return to work 1 week after if they are like in the case of RD cad with infants who s'occuppent 24/24h her child. This will expand the childcare business as the U.S..

Roll on the next elections that change becomes president because it's great !!!!!! add anything: the parental leave that will shorten

you confuse maternity and parental leave.

there is no question of maternity leave (which may be extended to be in the EU average), but parental leave ….

It speaks of parental leave is leave taken by mothers or fathers by choice only, which everybody is concerned. Sarko does not affect the maternity leave, you must read an article properly before crying wolf.

I was always told "parental leave X weeks before pregnancy so …" For my answer, look at this yahoo question, I put it in "Law": http://fr.answers.yahoo .com / question / index; _ylt = AilVyuDYOILp2LJk6qXlzIErAgx.; _ylv = 3? qid = 20090213054719AA3bjUd

heu ben hop hop hop calm tata rachida have nothing to s'reprocher or Uncle SARKO see instead of quoting from aubry, Lolland, segolene, Fabius, mauroy, if you know what I want to say.

Related Blogs

• Diddy talks “Last Train to Paris” « Hip Hop Vibe
• Dining in Paris, a collectors story… « Trouvais
• Paris Hilton's Exercise Routine!