Since 1975 to date abortion has killed millions of tiny babies (+ the great genocide of the History of France). According to projections minima (those who assume that children died from abortion does have never had children themselves), there are currently about 8 million French Additional 5 million working age. Why this remark? 1 / Because 3 million workers, the number needed to sustainability of our pension system without changing the retirement age to 60 years, neither the contributions nor pensions. 2 / Because 2 million workers, the number needed to France to stabilize the balance of the budget Social Security without raising premiums, without declining reimbursements. With 5 million workers and more, we could both sustain our pensions and save Safely without effort or financial work. There, not only are we trying to die economically, but in addition we made the blackmail of immigration. The pro-abortion have. The pro-abortion ontcontribué to break France economically and to collaborate in the substitution of its original people, then two things – either you assume to have an abortion or supported abortion rights and you wear your mouth today ' Today on pensions and Safely. – either you complain reforms of pensions and social security system and then you emprennez to yourself today and you reject the right to abortion. In life we can not require butter, butter dough and fuck the dairy. uncultivated strip, it would not have 5 million more unemployed because there would have been 8 million consumers in most countries and therefore offer more employment and growth. Unemployment evolves proportional and non-additive.

You mean 5 million unemployed and more!

but these 5 miilion beings unborn, how many unwanted and sustained by their mothers, would have finished abused, raped, beaten, abandoned, killed? How have finished on the street? I'm for abortion, but I find that currently it is used too liberally … more control was needed, especially for minors. and do not forget that we are generally 2 to cause a pregnancy … it is unfortunate to always carry the guilt of an abortion on the woman alone, who often finds himself forced ….

quite daccord with einn @

In your calculations projecting what would be if abortion was illegal you do not count: – Consultations psy children born of unwanted pregnancies and rejected by their mother – care for sepsis, haemorrhage, infertility, resulting from clandestine abortions, which have and will always exist in countries where abortion is illegal.

No, there would be 5 million more poor, who should pay Social Security sessions at the shrink, the best, or worse. Your knowledge of economics have remained at level math-CE2, unfortunately it's all a bit more complicated than addition and subtraction.

YES but 8 million consumers in more consolidated that Chinese products, it would not create more jobs in France so far. And if "3 million workers and more" sufficient to perreniser our pension system, well, it is great, that's about the number of unemployed that a. Finally, totally for the right to abortion because women have the right to have their belly as they wish and that n is not a "light" to decide who should have children to pay him his retirement.

For your information the number of births has nothing to do with the deficit of the s / s but the number of jobs created since the budget of S / S is powered by the employee and employer contributions. Use other argument to fight abortions that the law allowed WEIL and fortunately a lot of women having abortions in France and not in poor conditions and often fatal. The religion of which we feel that it is present in your claim has nothing to mingle at this issue for the happiness of women who often personal issues are forced to have abortions with a heavy heart. To complete your poor arguments are related to your prose by treating other uncultivated because of that they are not of your opinion, which shows your true colors.

1 – abortion is practiced in France three months before … so this is a fetus not a baby 2 – This simplistic reasoning that mixes religious and economic precepts is simply unfounded, because what is lacking in France is not his lack of skill ' work (see unemployment) but the relocation of industry …

still an asshole ass-beni would change quickly to notice if the men were also obliged to assume the responsibility that Dad is not good knock very serious but he is out of question to keep this thing in our impure Service

I told myself that there were not many people at my job, I understand better now, thank you for the info.

Accounting mess! Germans are 20 million more than us, and everyone knows they have 20 million unemployed and under no problems with safety or retirement! Also, if you force women to keep a a baby she does not want, you have good chance it will not make any other (except of course if you want more obstructing contraception). So, a woman who was aborted due to an unwanted pregnancy , may then want to have 2 or 3 kids when she feels ready. One thing it did not do with your system. Conclusion: if it is without the law on abortion, it might have had less birth o)

If a law was voted in favor of abortion is that there was need. An unwanted pregnancy can make a woman unhappy and the unborn child throughout their lives. Although we all tend to do, it is to judge that?

as nonsense. at least know that the number of abortions among women before 1975 was also important that abortion today? you at least know that tens of thousands of young women were found either in the cemetery is unable to have children following operations abortionist poorly executed? abortion is one of the greatest conquest of women that even intelligent men must defend. this election may actually hurt the religious consciences of some "orthodox ideological" While the various commands our religions forbid it, but we leave all our religions individual choice as opposed to Asian cultures where the individual does not exist. but before the slaughter of young women before 1975, due to pass this law under the passage giscard and not as mittran evoke some ignorant was a social imperative and a right to assist a person in danger.. The only downside CONCERNED HOWEVER the fact that despite all the means contracption girls can still get pregnant so many. Sex education from the college should probably be made by doctors and sexologists why not.

The number of deaths is similar, but more concerned for a distant country and the misery that prevails in France. What do you think?

Comparison not very happy. Between an act which is optional and an unpredictable disaster, not comparable.

In case there is indeed dead, the other I see none. There the end of a potential human being be sure, but then if your wife had a miscarriage, you'll put him back on the manslaughter? I hope that when you talk about poverty, you mean that experienced by women (do not forget the men either) who has an abortion .. Regarding Haiti, indeed the Western world loves to meddle in the affairs of others. Maybe if some malicious did not rife for their own interests there, there would saved 200,000 lives … On one side we are dealing with personal choices, the other the result of the greed of some men … @ Foughali S "In the second case, that is due to a natural phenomenon for the moment the man is impotent and can not do anything to these natural disasters." How do you explain that Rep. Dominican There have been no damage? Perhaps this is due to the extreme poverty of Haiti, and the dilapidated buildings? And how did we get here eh?

I think that death is equal to another, was the only difference is that the first murders.

The 200 000 abortions in France are not of misery, but several causes, the most important is ignorance of how their body works and operation of contraception by women.

Only send more money to Haiti, cotisons us for these poor women who will not stop mourn their dead …!

In the second case, that is due to a natural phenomenon for the moment the man is impotent and can not do anything to these natural disasters. By cons, regarding the first case, we must admit that it was deliberate and intended, which consequently requires to ponder on this phenomenon that sometimes we must recognize is inevitable.

What is spectacular and interesting for television moves. The plight of Haitian children has upset many people while children murdered through abortion matter, since the majority are not fetuses or children, just small bits of meat that we can get rid without morality. inexcusable in France when contraception is free for the girls in the pmi. The education of parents is to bcp in these ivg unmarked. A girl of 15 years must be protected by information and discipline of these parents. Parents should no longer tolerate their daughters to have sex at home because this attitude worth consent to too many things.

The number of abortions in any way reflect the prevailing poverty in a country but the lack of an adequate prevention policy on contraception. Misery becomes real when the children from their early days, are delivered to them even want to enjoy the attention and love, real and not over-played their parents. Although non-voluntary (non-controlled) this lack of attention may amount to torture. In this context it seems more appropriate that pregnancy does not lead rather than torturing a child all his life (knowing that an adult then tends to reproduce on their own children the torment he has suffered). L ' Abortion is seen as a last appeal available not only to protect the mother any pain but also to prevent the suffering they may impose an unwanted child. But the best solution is obviously that pregnancy does not begin with adequate contraception. Alas, all. Alas, toutevolonté policy on contraception is severely hampered in some ultra-religious lobbies advocating a total taboo on the subject of sexuality have as a guideline abstention as ineffective and dangerous. They are often the same groups that oppose abortion, these fundamentalist groups whose spheres of influence over the extremists do not hesitate to commit murder against aillant some women resort to abortion or against the hospital staff. (Can we speak of fundamentalist terrorist groups?). In the United States for example, where these groups display their power rates of teenage pregnancy is 6 times higher than in France. Proof of a policy completely inadequate to the reality, Sarah Palin, a leader of the ultra-religious fundamentalism (and incidentally former candidate for the vice presidency of the United States) saw her daughter getting pregnant at age 17 years during the 2008 presidential campaign. As for those who still ignore the suffering of unwanted children and. As for those who still ignore the suffering of unwanted children ANDTHEIR parents demonstrate, many studies have reported strong correlations between the legalization of abortion and the decline in violent crime. Again, the United States have the highest prison population rate of all OECD. The question would have been especially knowing what would have been misery ambient France had prevented if those 200,000 abortions. For the rest I agree with the response of Creative Union of Creationists and stressed that the comparison is fallacious between personal choice that and abortion is a natural disaster.

The day the French of all ages will appreciate that abortion is not contraception the cows come home. I say this because I will be the mother of two little twin died at birth. 26 years after I 'm still marked with a hot iron. After the drama I am pregnant again and I was treated to special scrutiny of my pregnancy, which reflected very soon. My future baby measured 1cm5 it had small arms short legs, I was moved. I said at the time that we should spend an echo to all mothers who believed in abortion.

Haiti has a fool s l c abortion is more important

A country as developed and civilized who would have thought it a shame for the French women! For Haiti is a settling of accounts between him and God, I do not meddle.

I am asked to calculate the percentage of energy provided by protein in lactating women and pregnant women. Knowing that for a woman breastfeeding her need for protein is 80 g, and the pregnant woman's need for protein is 75g. What computations must I do?? Please

A percentage is part of a whole, we agree? So you must tell us how many calories pregnant women need, and how many calories provide 75g of protein. Ps the calorie is the unit that measures the Energy