the arguments for abortion are most often mentioned are those of the interests of the child, which I find hypocritical, because we know very well that it is in the interest of the "mother" (if we can call it that) where the raped woman or danger to the mother's life apart. 1 – if the mother can not afford to raise, it does not work and that its financial situation is very difficult. If we follow your reasoning therefore African, Indian, South American should not make children? These poor but who wish to start a family should not do? There are small African, not console games, who live with very little, need nothing else! they are very happy and grow very well (although those are nice save cf Western Ark zoea) by cons there are children from affluent who take drugs are in conflict with their parents, end up anorexic or commit suicide (j ' to know) so this argument does. Chtonk @ b all depends on his psychological state, whether it will kill the child's birth is not better, if she is fit to continue her pregnancy and decide after I évidemmentcontre. Chtonk @ so what? It is well known that the woman who is pregnant and therefore to be more responsible at the child if she is abandoned by a cowardly, and besides, even if the man wants to keep the ONLY children a woman can decide if she wants an abortion or not the creole @ 14 year old girl pregnant, not so much sexual guilt for parents, listening is easy to complain after such a big mistake … I certainly have no right to tell another woman what to do but I am totally against, it was not the same way of looking at things simply. If a friend of mine has had an abortion so I'll talk to him more and that's it. And I know some atheists against abortion:) thank you for respecting my views. @ Adem you're a Muslim? @ Φφ the evil RTree important training in general are dangerous and in this case I "ve said that I did not object, and then there is not so crippling that can be detected before D-Day or at least before stage. @ Adem you're a Muslim? @ Φφ the wrong training RTree important in general are dangerous and in this case j "I say that I did not object, and then there is not so crippling that we can anticipate before the big day or less before a stadeavancé of pregnancy so speak to me of hypocrisy if you like, you do not know me, know my life, I've known people with disabilities believe me because of certain events in my life, hypocrisy does not come from me, but people who have abortions just because their child has Down Syndrome. How people did before? No one terrified not detect this kind of handicap? AND they were doing well with it! and hypocrisy is also because we want to believe that it is the most common cases, while in most cases it is for a "mistake". watch out to what you say before you open it, besides if your mother told you you would not have failed to say a bunch of junk @ Pharisee oh yeah you think about abortion at 40? age where exactly is risky to have children? "I reckon not agree but the basic problem is that they want to have an abortion, I am not speaking specifically of law but of morality, how can I find it normal ?
if you really want do not fall into hypocrisy, we must also consider the situation where the child comes from a rape … unless you do not consider this as the error of a careless woman, which I find quite appalling and pitiful As for "the mistake of a careless woman," it makes me cry … Of course, it is solely responsible for that …. since man is a sperm provider, has only given him, and he is in no way responsible … I find your remarks quite nauseating
You say anything! Let life take its short one listens anyway and all are headed
A saying from our grandmother said "whoever has his hand in a basin of warm water can not judge the person who hands in a fire" pray to God not to be facing a similar situation. Well hello @ @ http://www.gyneweb.fr/sources/echographie/bbenoit/patho3D/malform.html
is your point of view that is everyone has to decide you know all situations?
and you forget the women who become pregnant by rape or compelled by force battered women to have intimate relations with … after you, they have no right to abortion? we must think a little even when … When disabled children whom you speak, how are you sure they are happy (and more depending on the disability? there are children on their bed, who does not think who do not eat unless infusion …. A girl who gets pregnant at 14 years, by "accident" should keep the child, does not have an abortion? .. I think in your words, religion plays a role and it is your right but remember that everyone has the right to choose life, choose to have children and live in the street begging for some or access to abortion, to having a disabled child and take responsibility, not the structure adapted to or have chosen to abort because mentally not ready to assume this role … Everyone is entitled to their opinions, I respect Samira .. but yours does not tell a pregnant woman what she should do is his choice, his responsibility …
Everyone's ideas …. but you should go for a walk in family planning …… and listen to the distress …. you would see that things are not as simple !…..
Imagine the mother of Hitler or Stalin had failed, many deaths averted! Abortion is not a panacea, contraception should be preferred. Raising a child is a choice (I have high Only my daughter), it should not be an accident, I am sometimes surprised to discover that the biggest opponents of abortion are sometimes the same people who do not hesitate to bless our armed forces (religious wars) and advocate violence cons who do not think like them.
Abortion should not even be considered unless it is medically proven danger to the mother and it should be discovered early enough ie the first few weeks .. after the 16th week, the fetus becomes a human being ", and abortion tantamount to murder, period. now speak of error is so careless woman hypocritical. So a woman who has a sexual relationship which does not imply any "pregnancy" is conservative? Is it safe to have sex outside of marriage legal? Open your eyes, by dint of thinking this way, before long the whole society would consist of bastards!
,
… People are not FOR abortion, but FOR the right to abortion …
There is no argument FOR abortion. THERE is, however, arguments for prolonging the lives of women. Susi I always surprised at the lightness with which young women lament the life of the unborn fetus, considering, however, without scruple of conscience, massacres thousands of women.>> "arguments for abortion that are most often mentioned are those of the interests of the child," How old are you? To say this kind of foolishness, it should not have reached 40 years. The major arguments which sent the law on abortion were the following: * If a woman wants an abortion, it offered two solutions depending on whether it is in a affluent or disadvantaged backgrounds: a) – she has money: It starts in Switzerland or the Netherlands. She abortion in a medical antiseptic and she returned to full health without having to start its future possibilities of having children. B) it has no money. She sees an "abortionist" who exploits (it. She sees an "abortionist" who exploits (çacoûte still expensive). It's done with a knitting needle and antiseptic years. It may be perforate the uterus because the concierge (they were often janitors) has no idea of the anatomy. She faces a fatal hemorrhage or sepsis. It damages their future opportunities to have children. * 30% of women who have abortions in the mid to "wild" died of sepsis, 10% became sterile The main argument in favor of a bill to decriminalize abortion is this: The law on abortion saves the lives of poor women. The argument is secondary one: In Europe it was up to annoy the left by the imperatives of religion and morals of the Catholic women. It is out of question to let annoy another religion that has the same requirements. The laws of decriminalization of abortion do not force anyone to abort. There is no question that religions are forcing women who want an abortion to do so under conditions. There is no question that religions are forcing women seeking abortions do so in conditionsqui put their lives at stake in my opinion, the subsidiary argument is stronger than the main argument: neither the clergy nor the Imams must decide how women who do not practice these religions lead their lives.
I am for abortion if the mother's life is in danger and for other reasons, I think there's only scientist who can help you answer such as rape I do not really know.
"2 – the disabled child, it will not be happy, he will have a difficult life. This argument is most hypocritical of all!" ==> You do not rub bcp of malformed babies and severely disabled you. Babies whose life expectancy is sometimes a few days, hours or minutes, when they are not born dead … "hypocrite" … you are pathetic!
Nobody is "for" abortion. But it is RIGHT for an abortion. And only the women involved are able to judge.
Sin in the world that has led to the type of criminal action.
Subject complicated and sensitive, if you approach with the ease of someone who does not know what she said … It is therefore necessary to put things in place to prevent malleable minds believe what you say. Nobody is for abortion. It is simply "the right to abortion. As its name indicates is a RIGHT, not an obligation. It respects and individual choices. If a woman does not want an abortion, and although nobody will force. And if not, nobody should stop him either. The main arguments for this law that was mainly to avoid seeing women die butchered, and he was also the question of freedom of conscience of women. " If a friend of mine has had an abortion so I talk to him more and that's it "… You have warned your friends, in addition to judge anyone who does not think like you, you do not know the meaning of the word "friendship"? You measure the meaning of your words sometimes? What destroyed the women in these. You have warned your friends, in addition to judge anyone who does not think like you, you do not know the meaning of the word "friendship"? You measure the meaning of your words sometimes? What destroys women in cesconditions is double punishment. You will do so happily among the executioners.
@ (S) IS NOT: Samira, someone who does not know what she said? This is not my impression! Defending the right to abortion also means defending abortion: more than 200,000 annually in France remember it …. and how many babies whose life is interrupted so. And how many post-abortion trauma: the testimonies abound. How many mothers feel bad then the mere sight of other women carrying their babies, alive one?