Hello everyone, I will explain my situation, it is one month that I am with my boyfriend, everything goes well, we are very close Friday night I saw fesait a massage and that his hands were taken, asked me to take his laptop and send him a message to his buddy. When I send the said hurriedly: "Do not go in recent contact contact but simply" of course my little finger tells me to press recent contact and there I see the name of his ex … He has to understand and start to panic, I threaten to leave on the field and break if I do not tell the truth and he admits there trembling with fear, tears in his eyes, his ex has sent him a message announcing she was pregnant and she had been aborted, she asked him for half the price of abortion … It showed me all the messages sent and received, 4 in total (two of them, 2 of him), short and precise without any slippage of the two … He told me as crowns. He told me as crowns, "it's been a month since we're together, it was the worst thing that could happen, I was scared, I panicked, I expected to find the right time and the right words to tell you … I did not want to lose you … "(he got the news Wednesday, he told me Friday) What do you think? Thanks

I think anything at all ….

you can not say that it begins to panic when his ex is pregnant, it was forced fucked …

After a typical month he scared! Personally I do not think anything is the past.

do not want him, the time it collects the new and the shock of it has given him, for three days to tell you everything is good!

It's in your question: "He showed me all the messages sent and received, 4 in total (two of them, 2 of it), short and precise without any slippage of the two …" He doesn 't no wrong and they are separated, his ex and himself. Normal that contribute to the cost of abortion: it is half responsible for the pregnancy of her ex, it must assume that. In my opinion, you have no worries you do. Be happy together and PROTECT YOU! The condom is also valid against pregnancy than against the disease.

well it is still okay with him and that's it!

I think it could hardly do otherwise, the past is past, he might even wait more to tell you because at the limit because it had happened before that does not concern you. You're set for a month and that it can always break when his life before your meeting is his problem. In addition you do not find anything that suggests that their relationship continues. I would even say what happens to you is not stolen you did not watch! if you watched your communication certainly would not be very happy. You have shown him that you did not trust him!

I were you I would support

lets and at the end of the week everything will be better

I think he cares about you and that his excuse is valid.

I think the DS situation or you are, he must understand your anger, and that you understand yourself as a very serious error, this girl is now pregnant, psychological support needs, and have your buddy c is to support it, if you love to solve this sad problem, I say good luck

I think he was honest, even if it took a while, it is indeed a story that is not always easy to tell his girlfriend. Proof that he cares about you, He did not hesitate to show you all SMS exchanged once you asked him for clarification. The fact that he cries (it is rare for a man to be caught crying) shows that for him time was important, therefore the risk that you leave him it is frightened, so he cares about you (unless of course if it was film, but here it is for you to judge, it's you who attended the scene). You should forgive him especially if he makes you a massage regularly. ^ ^ It's a good guy somewhere, he has agreed to participate in abortion, he assumed his bullshit.

I think you're up for anything cabbage! You seem to be a jealous woman and ch … painful, you, right?

bah! bof! nothing must move on

I think it is not obliged to tell you everything … It is not long as you are together! I think he is sincere with you and wants to try his luck with you … He looks much more love and he told you the messages received and sent … So do not leave for that.

http://www.slate.fr/story/21799/editer-le-boucher-les-echos Yeah, it's not Zust, they are more in larger schools than others. 1 of 2 the bastards! Would it not sterilized (vasectomies, tubal ligations performed on mandatory vacation time)? Would not it just a decision perfectly constitutional, duly taken by democratic and proposed by the HALDE, Richard and Philip DESCOINGS Meirieu? And then also they should be prohibited from adopting or make medically assisted reproduction: what are basences pretexts of these lazy and the more they took the opportunity to travel to Haiti and Viet Nam on school time! And ultrasound scans, they have only to do during their holidays. I also propose that an abortion is the teachers who do not have the good taste to come forward during the holidays. (Which also should be reduced to 5-week-as-all-the-world), that way there will be more abortions useful! Bizard is, I am not the son of Prof. and yet I 't. (Which also should be reduced to 5-week-as-all-the-world), that way there will be more abortions useful! Bizard is, I am not the son of Prof. and yet I 'aipassé competitions difficult memories and jai is a thesis … Ah yes, but I listened to my teachers, I do not care a mess in school, I was not complaining that the school timetable made me violent. I do not Cramant cars. I do not even spit on the floor. Yet I was an unrepentant leftist. When a teacher was absent, did not seek to be replaced urgently if I'd break everything at home or on the street. At 14, I was not a burden of care for my father but rather a professional help if I went earlier. I was not stupid like those of many, not a genius either, just normal, you know. So I succeeded. Even my holiday began June 25 and September 15 ended and I thought it was good (it seems that now is the old ideas con). I give a damn shorts at 16 years from March to November, there was no internal regulations against it (now it sucks pro-burqas and were banned. I give a damn shorts at 16 years from March to November, there was no internal regulations against it (now it sucks pro-lesbermudas burqas and are forbidden in June in some colleges and high schools). I guess my progressive ideas in my time schoolboy became the ideas of old fart? I admit that it is time consumerism, and psychologism pedagogism 2 balls (the pauv 'darlings, they plant their teachers and spitting on bus drivers, it is because of school time)?

is in large part because of immigration that we plant the teachers, but it's taboo to say it

I read you and I quite agree on the facts I think that one cause is television. It takes nearly four hours of cohabitation (1) … All these edifices, and less contact

I know that folds behind the law to say at what point a fetus becomes a human being, preventing any recourse to abortion. But life is not a game, and abortion is an act that requires to assume all responsibilities and consequences! Which law should be preferred, that of becoming mother or the unborn child?

Abortion is not murder because it removes what is not a child. If you push the logic of anti-abortion to the absurd, a cyst, a nodule, tumor have a conscience and must not be removed. You see? Another argument: a child born in a home that does not want and can not afford to raise them. Where are his rights there? Better to live in these conditions or not living (knowing that a fetus aborted never lived) and what is the position of anti-abortion on children with severe disabilities? Better to let them vegetate all their life on a bed of bedridden or prevent all this suffering for the child and his family?

you mean "women become" since becoming a mother it means nothing!

This is not new, but personally I think the answer is personal in any case within the limits of French law. And then it must be a beginning, French law says that at 11 weeks seems far-fetched as saying that 2 cells is a human being, while a small piece of skin that I scratched it represents more.

This question is not "controversial", it just completely sterile. Whether or not allowed, there have always been women who aborted and there always will be … not worth discussing here over the centuries. The fact that it is legal just allows better supervision and avoid women maimed or dead on the kitchen table. If you do not want women have abortions, it is necessary that men do not make their one child per year there are more rapists, more incest, more accidents and more condom forget pill, the more difficult living and poverty, many men who once barred their pregnant girlfriend and more children with disabilities … provided that it is impossible and it will not happen! And think that women who abort do not light heart and do not find it harmless. And the law being who exists and has already living on the avails of course, what might become a person but is still nothing more than a tiny cluster of cells without conscience.

The miscarriage is spontaneous abortion, we must condemn the woman who made a manslaughter?

not abortion is not a crime legalized! is the free choice of every woman to have her body (why should they suffer unwanted pregnancy and all that goes with it then you guys have the opportunity lache to escape?)

The issue is not controversial and much less sterile, it is still today a major topic of bioethics and neuroscience. The debate is not always confined within the elite, contrary to what is commonly admitted. And the crux of the debate is a battle between teams of different embryologists and neuroscientists, philosophers, etc., etc. to find out from to be considered when the embryo as nervously active. The debate is very deep, much, much more than what is presented in "public." And here, on a general site we can see everybody reapply with a brutal response, single and without appeal: everyone thinks hold with certainty Truth. That is to say you got those who say NO this is not a CRME legalized and say that the question is stupid, and who did you say yes of course and break the other . It makes me laugh when I see that even eminent thinkers doubt and fail to give a clear answer. Basically, it is not a. Basically, we do not know of unpoint scientifically whether or not one can speak of "murder." Only responses "literary" of metaphysics and religious responses, and other atheists. Science has not yet responded. So for the moment we do not know. So stop being fundamentalist in your mind (yes endpoint, whether the endpoint and no discussion, because it's like that).

That all depends on your beliefs regarding the beginning of life: either it begins at birth, or it begins at conception. No, life is not a game, and it is precisely because I I have great respect for life, woman and child than I am for abortion. I'll explain my reasons. First, I know what it feels like not to have been a child desired. Your mother does everything to take care of you, but deep down she knows, and you feel it does not want your presence. To wipe the guilt she will overprotects, but love is something voluntary, not imposed, and it can not deceive, it becomes oppressive, guilt, and do not meet the real needs Child (protection needs among others). I return to what I said love, including breast, is not necessary. A woman who is "forced" by his entourage, law or morality it is necessary to keep a child she does not will not be a good mother, will not be able. A woman who is "forced" by his entourage, law or morality it is necessary to keep a child she does not will not be a good mother, will not be mesurede really love, protect, and help her child. It is a great suffering for the child, so he asked all his life what he doing there (sometimes prefer to die) and mother who lives plagued by guilt and sacrifice their free choice. Sometimes the mother and child, it is better that the child was born. Then you have the right to say that we must strive to avoid reaching that point, and I am quite d Okay. There are several solutions which all have a common starting point: learn to communicate about sexuality with young people (even if young people are not only concerned with abortion, but good information is still top for life) . They learn by example to say "no" to express their expectations, their understanding of the issues that are behind the sexual act (not to ban them because their bodies belong to them, but especially that they bear the consequences), and mostly importantly, they allow free access to contraception. We can not prevent others. We can not prevent autresde do what they want from their lives, however we can inform them about the consequences of their actions. The Netherlands are among countries where abortion is the easiest to access and yet it is less practiced in France: there, we did a lot of campaigns on contraception, it also communicates.

c is an act of conscience for the life of a fetus is a life "to hunt or fish does not eat what is killing the failure to protect in the sexual act using his body against nature with the risk of diseases such as AIDS polemic on life is a potential risk for those who seek the controversies the question is still Satan said that the man with his character has the free will to follow his tracks and just look at the result of the god of this world satan loves phylosophy for he has even try phylosophy with God being far more of human perfection MORALITY REMOTE s also increasing and everyone's accounts will join a cause that is identical to the self same Jesus said to desire a woman in his heart c est deja l adultery if you were to remove a life as a fetus in how your conscience to know the consequences for you and the mother> nobody will judge you because you will judge you even into your thoughts as to whether you will No excuse or accuse never forgetsSatan resurrects that does not risen Lord GOD make your choice it nya no 3 rd solutions

It appears to me difficult to consider that just as there are genetic individuality there is "life" and "conscience". Otherwise, all that actually kills us (viruses, bacteria, cancer …) should be preserved as part of their unique DNA, they are endowed with "conscience" and "life." The life according to religion and morality is sometimes preserved at the cost of the absurd. How many people suffering from incurable disease, conscious of their condition and kept alive only by machines or medicines have asked to die? That they were denied for many, the name of "life". But it is reasonable to ask "what life?" How far must we go through suffering to preserve the "life." Spontaneous abortion also exists, yet no one accuses the nature of "play with life "discarding an embryo unviable. If abortion is an ancient practice. I think that today it is best managed and most respectful. I think that today it is best managed and most respectueuxdes rights of everyone (It also seems to me that this number is decreasing, contrary to what some say). We avoid seeing women left to die after an abortion wild. This could become quite marginal, while some instead to advocate abstention or ignorance, saw sex education in a normal reality. It is Anyway, out of the question back on the right. Especially for the sake of people who do not hesitate to show disrespect or to kill human life, they have worked so hard to "save".

Already when we talk about abortion in France in any case, we called an embryo, no fetus, except in the last 2 weeks of the statutory period. Embryo is a person? A fetus of 12 weeks is there a ? Murder by definition is to kill a person. So the question, an embryo or a fetus under 12 weeks are these people? And even, what are the unborn? Should we mourn d an embryo? At this rate there, that women who miscarry mourn 1 year and not bury their embryos? It must be logical, since the embryo is a person … It takes insurance funeral of the first day of delayed menstruation? When does this on one person? Legally, from birth, not before The baby is a person, the embryo and fetus younger than 12 weeks are not a certainty … It is ideological and even scientific. The fact is, there is not A return above the limit, abortion is allowed up to birth, it seems, "anyway, from 22. The fact is, there's no going back over the limit, abortion is allowed up to birth, it seems, "anyway, from 22semaines, structures of nerve pain are in place, it must have a good sense not? " I would agree, but is not when talking about one of unborn child? When there is a parental project. An embryo frozen in nitrogen could ultimately be considered a person potentielle.un embryo who moves into the uterus of a woman on the pill who does not want is not a potential person … Allow abortion before 12 weeks of pregnancy, is not to deny the potential person in an embryo or a fetus under 12 weeks, since there is no obligation to do so, and since in the context of a parental project, the same embryo and fetus even if he violates is defensible. It's just a possibility for a woman who has no parental project, that's all. And this is not an obligation, without parental project she may choose to keep the pregnancy anyway. And think well that women who use it have good awareness of issues and consequences. To the question,. To the question, does favors on the right to become the mother or the unborn child, the answer is both my master, but it is becoming mother or unborn child if and only if there are project Parental … And this is what is done legally, and it has nothing to do with abortion A pregnant woman who does not want child is not becoming a mother, it's just a woman pregnant an embryo that is not the result of a parental project is not an unborn child, just an embryo. But there, in your last question you consciously use the terms pro-life, and this is certainly not for nothing …

Hello everyone! We are a young couple of former students now in search of jobs and we just learned that we will be parents in just over 7 months! The concern is that our situation is difficult We live for the moment without resources as we seek both work but in vain, my boyfriend is going back to school in September but until then nothing is safe! My question: in our situation which aid can touch? During my pregnancy but also the arrival of baby … I wish he lacks nothing but I can not afford! So I count on you to help me! PS: I know what some will think like solution: abortion. But NO! This baby was not planned, not in our situation, but now it is here in me it grows every day and is the fruit of our love, how could I kill him?? No, never! Please give serious answers please! I should have specified: my boyfriend again alternating studies in September, ie. But NO! This baby was not planned, not in our situation, but now it is here in me it grows every day and is the fruit of our love, how could I kill him?? No, never! Please give serious answers please! I should have specified: my boyfriend takes studies alternately in September, to direqu'il is sure to have a salary (at least 800 €) per month for 2 years. For many months the only jobs being proposed replacements are just a few weeks, then it is thanks so one is never sure of anything. We are looking in all areas, thank you for the courage, we do not lack.

contact the nearest caf, but most importantly, make sure to find work quickly. I'm not quite sure either that this is the best time for your friend to resume studies … is not what will boil the kettle … Well anyway, regardless of the aid that you may have, it will not be enough to raise your child correctly. It takes at least that your friend works full time. I hope that you can count on a bit of help from your parents, or it may be very difficult … As for you, holds you now to find a way to care for your baby, otherwise you'll end up at-home mom … Courage …

during pregnancy you'll have a birth grant of 800 € at the 7th month of pregnancy and the baby once you've got the basic allowance of CAF that is € 177.80 monthly to the birth of your baby until its 3 years, and that's it! is little in order to live! If you have a paid maternity leave by secu starting 6 weeks before the DPA and will continue after 10 weeks, but as you've never worked I do not know of any basis on which will be calculated as there normally is calculated on a combination of your last 3 months of wages. Apart from this if you have no right assedic I do not want to be pessimistic but you gallery without any income. The only solution that you try working before the birth to open your rights to unemployment and then have some income when your vacation is over maternté time to find something else, but also said work to sit her child and it is expensive even with the aid of CAF. this is not the time for your friend. This is not the time for your amide resume his studies, he would do better to work on time as the situation settles and then you'll feel better when he can resume his studies. Defeat leaves you to work in anything, food, mac do, these are occupations where there is no need for qualifications and where it occurs on the job, I say this because there is a decade when I was looking for a job in my the secretariat branch I worked in acting for a living while waiting to find what I wanted it lasted 4 months, and I do not regret it because during that time I had a salary. Even if my friend was working and that we were not in your situation need j'vaais this work. There are no silly business you know. Good luck because you will have to.

Far less the idea of judging you, but you do not have the feeling to take the problem upside down?

Zero risk does not exist

NO, many women become pregnant before the return of layers while they are breastfeeding. There is a pill suitable and compatible with breastfeeding. If ever hood unless you want to fall pregnant quickly

I do not think these are ideas so be careful

Yes …. and not when the child has head in demand and often you're protected, but when feedings are spaced (reprise du taf, bb grows), you can get pregnant. That's why most nursing mothers take the pill (Cérazette example) to avoid pregnancy too soon.

not to the contrary, when a woman breastfeeds, she must be very careful because she can become pregnant illico

Voila it is finally here: capitalism biting its tail A human life is doomed because it costs too much to keep alive. I think there's nothing worse to hear to parents of sick children. And I hear it on TV just after we had announced it would soon be a movie about the case of frozen babies … Rather bad taste. The other day we talked about abortion rights … Is it then an abortion when the child is sick? Is it humanly possible to read a letter "Public health, ma'am we studied your case and we ask that you now have an abortion because the state will not be able to bear the costs of specific health of your child's disability. Accept Madame, Monsieur, the Republic "But where is this world? The end of humanism in politics it is the beginning of the end of man? And if 2012 was just a prediction, the disappearance of the man of the earth, but not that of the earth? @ Naga: waiting is not people who arrived the day before to. Please accept, Madame, Monsieur, the Republic "But where is this world? The end of humanism in politics it is the beginning of the end of man? And if 2012 was just a prediction, the disappearance of man Earth, but not that of the earth? @ Naga: waiting is not people who arrived the day before to make sefaire free the next day, they are virtually Canadians since the number of years they lived there, nothing to do with the French who are medical tourism in Tunisia for breast implants or 7 days you stay there and you returned to France. Worse is the global crisis, beyond the family had a job in Canada, returning to France Being unemployed is

the earth survive without man, is not this a blessing? it is a scourge, no need to prove it. c too easy to expect to be out to finally change. as has the abort, I am in a sense, because if c to prevent a child born malformed, for example, c as a blessing. of course, is atrociously what you put in the panel and capitalism .. . a vomit.

I see a country that protects its interests, or rather the interests of his community. You have to relativize because certainly in France, we never act like that with strangers but by cons in most other countries, n ' There has not even paid for their original own nationals. You have the money, we take care of you, you have not, you crèves.J 'I l "example I know of Indonesia but there are quantities of countries in this way. All this is not new and we can but deplore once again into perspective!

is a scandal, Canadians disappoint me a lot on that one there … You are established in a country for several years (5 years for them) you work, you will do, even your modest scale, turn the economy, but when you're sick, "back where you came from" …. ==> you're good when you brought

in Canada of immigration applicants must pass a medical examination such as contagious or deadly as the terminal cancer that no child is not the principal applicant does not pass the small cerebral palsy so the administrative decision is challenged and they will probably gain because the father and the mother was the lead plaintiffs status

I think it is just "me ruin – to show that we are rich" I do not find exceptional and moved that countries take measures so that society bears the least possible cost Disabled – Nothing is more normal I think to suggest to parents of an abortion – instead of giving birth to a sick or disabled – and I think those who complain do not wish for themselves the idea of having to manage the disability of their child – is not there a lack of humanism – but advantage of pure reason and logic – and also to protect their families –

it may shock at first, but make no mistake, in France, it still does not heal "the old" beyond a certain limit. The hospital reform will also victims: one hour ambulance to go to the first hospital it can be fatal. And when are Clampin vagal malaise, it does not send a helicopter. In France too, there is a medicine that has multiple speeds!

And what do you think of firefighters who begin to have more than ras-le-bol to be called for a yes or a no, while at the same time, they could intervene to something more serious? And do you think of these cavers who have mobilized several rescuers, because trapped in a cave? And they had the nerve more than the bill was too salty? Because more than he would have had the rescuers are excused from the inconsistency of these cavers? And if people take more responsibility instead of sytématiquement see everything at once and to have an atitude inconsequential?

Hello to all! A friend who has just given birth asked my advice for the following problem. I thought some of you could help since I could not bring her response: She gave birth there in 2 weeks, and should see her gynecologist in 8 weeks. She has received during her pregnancy leave pathological prenatal 2 weeks and heard the pathological postnatal leave of 1 month. It would take a parental leave of 6 months and should be requested before seeing her gynecologist. His question is: If the latter prescribes the postnatal leave when she has already made his application for parental leave of 6 months (since it must be done one month before the end of mat leave), it can notify his employer in the last minute to postpone the start date of parental leave?

she goes to see her gynecologist as soon as possible … better do it sooner rather than later …. and leave it as pathological … antibiotics … it's not automatic!

in fact there has not really leave "postnatal" pathologically sick is a normal, more or less of convenience that gives most women very tired or lactating. I think anyway for the employer that does not change much for the start of the holiday is mainly for the purpose of the holiday ….

You confuse everything – there is maternity leave: 6 weeks before, 10 after – it is what is termed in pathology MAXI lasts 15 days and your friend has already taken leave postnatal pathology does not exist as stated above, this is a sick, which is often prescribed for one month after mat leave. It is often said a decision of convenience for breastfeeding stories or sometimes even bearing the nonexistence of a way to keep If your friend is taking parental leave, there is no reason that I a month extra stop. If his doctor gave him a (thank you for the hole in the secu) date of departure would be postponed parental leave. Beware as this is a sick, is supported by 50% and secu not 100% as motherhood.

Well answered above. Patho leave postnatal exists. It must be your girlfriend better information but AC will not leave pathogenic. She wants the cake and eat it too.

Related Blogs

• MLB baseball » Reds give Rolen $13 million extension
• Cables To Go CTG 12ft 3.5MM STEREO AUDIO EXTENSION CABLE M/F …
• Extension Manager SlimList Lets You Place Buttons On Toolbar …