http://fr.news.yahoo.com/55/20110327/tod-ils-crent-une-poupe-que-les-fillette-17baed7.html @ dding … Yes, I think what really bothers me is proselytizing for breastfeeding!

I find the idea absurd and silly to me, a girl does not need to breastfeed her doll to show mom and as a kind of maternal love if you dig the concept more, I even say it makes me jump to anger not only breastfeeding is not mandatory as it wants to convince young mothers these days, but I do not see why it would require girls to learn it all so young that they do not need to do the worst in the article, qd it is written that the little girl learns what it takes to have a good healthy baby grrr good Health has nothing to do with breastfeeding, and you do not become mothers by pretending with good baby but coddling her baby after wearing it for nine months, giving birth, and learned to deal gradually after birth chtonk @: I take my feminism! but the dinette, mini Apire is a bit sexist, but it's less embarrassing, because Ca remains in the realm of the game, a boycan also play in absolute terms, you may find it a bit odd (though I saw my little nephew and my niece to play the market together and they are more funny than anything) but the little boy be asked not to stick out of the breasts to pretend to breastfeed is the packaging of the girl to her nurturing role only "natural" (in the biological sense because it is clear that in mammals that we are is the female who feeds) that bothers me, so at that age, for me, it must be in the game

The girls are not women or moms. Why not put them as a bra ????? Let our girls be and live their life as a little girl!

I await with impatience the undisguised doll has its rules and the doll boy who has his first erection / wet dream … that said, my daughter and breastfed her babies without the need to provide a specific doll … it's called imitation, and it is not a new concept @ infinity: if we follow your reasoning (not silly at all on the merits), one must also "remove" the dinettes, the cleaning trolleys , mini iron toy catalogs, not because it is not mandatory …

Why not, it is not sexual breastfeeding and the girls are not going to pervert it, but it risks a lot to offend and interfere in the "adults" there have a doll with this pretty option .. I've seen little paper doll with her to imitate her mother who was nursing her little sister that's what pi, ca smile, nothing more children are so exposed today to the television, or other vulgarity trivialized it should not be criticized as much as all the rest These are the things in life yeah it was on their way to justify the specifics of the doll are a bit weak and pose as women for allegedly connes need Special learning to breastfeed .. but otherwise, it may inspire them to be later than the chest when they have 14, 15 can be used for other than being pimply ploter by the court recreates otherwise, when we say that the girls are more fun things to breastfeed a doll, this account there, delete. But otherwise, it may inspire them to be later than the chest when they have 14, 15 can be used for other than being ploter by pimply recreates the court otherwise, when we say that the girls have fun with other things to breastfeed a doll, this account there, supprimonstoutes baby dolls because she did not yet of childbearing age, so to play with, change, bottle , Wash … and let them know that adults Barbies … when they give a bottle at their dolls, it disturbs us not because it does not affect an anatomical part … and they will not have to do it with these dolls

stupid! More dolls are realistic, minus the girl can play with, because what matters is that a child invents his game All toys super advanced can not create and hinder the development of intelligence.

Is saying that the girls have good habits when they suck later. Idiot! They do not know what else!

My daughter spends her time replicating what we do: it passes the broom (dailleurs I must tell him to apply a little, she is not on top) clears the table with a sponge, gives food to her dolls, sniffs their buttocks … I think it's cute. For the doll you're talking about before reading the article it made me smile limit, but when I read the justification, my hair bristles. "She tells the girls nurturing skills they will need to one day raise their own healthy babies" Ben sorry, but I'm not a view or daughter must learn to consistently play for later. She plays to play, have fun, they are conditioned enough without adding layers, "my daughter takes this doll, the breastfeeding (while you're not breasts) like that later you will have good reflexes"

ca debile goes with this movement which is to dress her daughter (even younger) as the mom! AC shocks me but not surprised! he had to invent a goat for something stupid like that!

Although breastfeeding mom myself, and proud of it, I agree with @ infinity. Stop putting pressure on mothers. Breast-feeding should remain a choice, it is not a bad mother because we prefer to bottle-feed her baby! For me this doll serves only to condition the girls. And this doll was sold by the league leach it would not have surprised …

I find the idea quite strange … Not expect me to buy my daughter …

I find it debile, and I also find it even more guilty, too women who do not breastfeed. Breastfeeding is good when it is lived and freely decided by the mother, the problem is that today, in motherhood, if you will not breastfeed or stop, we feel guilty to death. There I am afraid that with this kind of toy is stuffed into the skull girls, that not breastfeeding is not good.

it is primarily the selling point is stupid. children do not need that to imitate their parents. after, it's not shocking that the weapons for boys. My son recently told me that the baby was not in my stomach but in his. stop buying toys cans to our children, offer them what they like and avoid the stereotypes of the poor boys are playing like cars and girls work as maids. my son has so many toys "boys" and "girls" and the second baby, it will be her baby to give him head like mom made despite being a boy. I would have time to explain later why the boys in real life, can not breastfeed. Toy designers often forget that our toddlers often much more fun with the cardboard with the toy, and we also elsewhere.

push the argument a step further …. should offer small inflatable dolls for girls …. innocence, with breastfeeding you will do for even 2 or 3 children …. cons by men in life they will have much more …….. good dinette, kit cleaning and ironing I do not mind it useful …. well yes I go out …. I am far far far far away ….

children play and have played to imitate their parents. my son (almost 3 years) has a doll and when I fed my daughter, he moved with her doll and give the breast! Yet it is a boy, and he did not wait for a toy was invented! selling points but if cans are some prefer to buy a baby to breastfeed rather than to feed the baby bib I do not really see where the problem is. I'm more shocked when I see mini cookers and mini vacuum in the pages of the girls Christmas catalog!

is not the toy your child takes soien

I think it's serious

Speechless! Finally the horns of the info with Barbie s'pèce a cunt "were not far from reality. Pebbles sold separately.

why not, why is it that a girl would have to give the bottle to the doll?? what bothers me is make a doll to express the breast, with species of sea full of stuff @ @ @ toxic to stick on the body. after each looks after their own door, we can see proselytizing pro-breastfeeding, as others seen in the fact that there are lots of toys "or household cooks" or even those famous babies that confined the girls to a role of woman-at-home mom. what matters is that parents send their children, not what the industry wants us to do (besides, Bled @ @ and others will not be happy if the toys are starting to go against what they are trying to pass for 40 years! to know that everything that comes from their factory is better than what the mothers themselves). Briefly, why feel attacked by a toy, it can be found weak and all but why see proselytizing. (Home, my eldest daughter had made up the. (Home, my eldest daughter was invented long before it is cettepoupée: she gave her navel to her doll while I was breastfeeding her little sister!).

Proselytizing for breastfeeding?? But then, delete all the rays dolls sold with a bottle then stop proselytizing anti-breastfeeding? And if we stopped to bother with it eh? It is a doll that latches on, as there are dolls that poop and dolls that drink from a bottle. It's just a doll. I find her very ugly by the way, but the guys who invented it wants to wheat, period. No proselytizing about breastfeeding …

Incredible … Funny, this morning on France 5 Marcel Rufo (child psychiatrist) were just talking toys and finds that the toys too realistic (baby cries, pees, etc..) Are not helpful to the child, who will develop her imagination much better with a simple toy. So there, not only because it's silly to avoid the child having to imagine how the baby feeds, but in addition it is a travesty of the little girl to mother, with a chest, it's really strange. Toys today are more and more gadgets that mimic reality, but this is not what is useful for the child, the toy should be a support to the imagination.

Why it bothers you a lot? And why do you see proselytize for breastfeeding? The girls give breastfed naturally breastfeed their dolls. My daughter does, she does suck even teddy bears. What is wrong? That's how it is nurtured from birth, and the bottle, she does not know. She has had a sippy cup, but she preferred to drink the glass very quickly, although she sometimes drank a bottle of my breast milk when we were driving over long distances, but not frequently enough for it s 'apparently can remember. She has a bottle and a pacifier to one of her dolls, but she does not know what to do. She never had a pacifier, so she does not know what's the point, neither the interest of the thing. These are accessories that she does not know what to do. So a doll that weeps and says nothing when he sticks a pacifier or bottle should be just as shocking and disturbing in this case. No? Since the teat and bottle are accessories that have no utility for. No? Since the teat and bottle are accessories that have no utility pourtous parents. I find this doll nice and I can not find it shocking at all. Everyone should be able to find toys that match the lifestyle of the child. @ Infinite: your speech is full of prejudices. It looks like the speech I had to motherhood when I was told that my nipples were not suitable for breastfeeding because not enough highlights. Yet breastfeeding for almost 2 years now. Just as we do believe that women have no chest they will not have enough milk to feed their baby, so it's not a question of size. So it is not because a girl has not yet formed a chest it can not simulate the act of breastfeeding. And little boys too can breastfeed. There too, a man can breastfeed. That is, even if it is extremely rare. Men can also have breast cancer. Although this is rare. Rare does not mean impossible.

It does not bother me more than the dolls sold with bottles. If one follows the reasoning of the question, the dolls sold with bottle proselytize for manufacturers of infant formula. Is it really better?

A single reference to breastfeed doll ar compared to the thousands who can give the bottle and it's proselytizing … Find the error! This doll, like all the other dolls to function, one is forced to buy it. Girls and boys who are breastfeeding regularly around them did not wait for this doll to put their all against their small tits … This doll is primarily a marketing coup. As key to breastfeeding, a highly sensitive subject (proselytism and company), it is debatable. Well done, everybody talks about their brand, it's good for them!

A doll with normal girls (or guys ptits as mentioned above) may well imitate mom and pretend to give the breast (already seen), no need for stickers in the shape of flowers or other accessories. Like all toys present only the marketing and that's bad … No big deal. Me I do not buy and that's that! (Especially since I have a boy that would make me strange even when it starts to breastfeed her teddy bear), but I do not buy any of zhuzhupet or other electronic gizmo bizarre: it cubes, small playmobils, my pots, milk bottles and empty cans filled with beans cow kiri … it occupies enough for now.

Outright prohibition of abortion, abandonment of the struggle against wage discrimination, return almost mandatory for women in homes, divorces less "advantageous" separation between girls and boys in school, reduction of criminal penalties for men who beat their wives … It marked black and white in their program. Navy starts as macho. It is no coincidence in my opinion! My sources? Frontists your site: refusal to sign a charter for parity: http://www.fnidf.com/index.php?/democratie-regionale/a-propos-de-la-charte-pour-l-egalite-hommes -femmes.html Otherwise just go on google, and his compelling analysis abound: the FN wants to reduce the status of women in procreation and education of children is clear as crystal! http://maisondesfemmes.free.fr/revue/fn/prog.fn.vs.fems.htm http://www.raslfrontrouen.com/actualites-regionales/communique-des-collectifs-droits-des-femmes-de Rouen-Normandy-and-action-antifascist-2.html http://www.lepoint.fr/archives/article.php/81463 etc.

and you forget, "the burqa compulsory!"

When rhymes with fascist macho … and with all forms of discrimination in fact, coming from all sides

Put us a cut glue instead of writing nonsense …

No evidence, no answer.

Your source for all things you enact. To say that it is marked black and white in their program does not exempt you to forward the links unless you're in their good books. YearOfth @. Orange, c is always the same mayor and a long time. To believe that the measures are not so bad as that. Know that I am the FN and more rooted than you think, It is because this program I know that I requires far more credible sources that the fact free to move such and such a measure is written in the program. You misinformation.

You look at what they did – sorry, what they tried to do – in Orange, Vitrolles or other common … It corresponds to a significant decline in social skills, advances in sexism, and so on. And @ Jean Yanne (luckily it was not like that!) @ Raoul Salan and seeking sources! Can barely write French and are not able to read a program … "EDIT: Vitrolles (13) stayed from 1997 to 2002 in the hands" of Megret, "Madam mayor since being officially Mr. could not … In 2002, Guy Obino became mayor (PS). In 2009, Loïc Gachon (PS) who is elected. Orange (84): Mayor Jacques Bompard, elected in 1995 under the label FN and passed in 2005 under the label MPF, then in 2008 without label .. . A guy who has convictions, indeed …!

Anything

You see how people respond fhaineux who ignore their flaws of machismo and racism … watch out J have posted a lot of questions like this and they point out that until it blows … They don t want to soak them nose in their poo … it would be good though!

How to make baby who is breastfed, can make stools more than once a week?

if your baby is not more than one seat per week, it is high time to panic ..

In fact, your baby does not make much stool as if you breastfeed, there is no waste for disposal, or not too. In any case, less than industrial milk. In fact, he thoroughly enjoyed your milk which contains almost as completely assimilated elements that baby. If your baby seems to be going well, do not worry, stool once a week when he is nursing is normal. I too was worried at first but my pediatrician told me everything. Enjoy it because after, with diversification, it happens more often and it did not smell the same … I hope to have t help a little …

It is normal for a breastfed baby three months is not more than once a week. It may even be less often than that. Your milk is perfectly suited to the needs of your baby and produces little waste. Do not complain, it's pretty handy, no?

Hello, My sister has an adorable little Yuna 3 months (born on 02/14/2010). She took three weeks before the CCA and the girl was a little weight, 2.360 kg at birth. At the mat 'she tried to breastfeed but it did not go well, little baby weight did not take enough. It fell to 2,060 kilograms and has decided to move to the bib, continuing a few feedings before each bib. Milk was originally for the modilac prema, thickened I think, took the little weight quickly, but often had colic and constipation. Then she moved to the first age modilac transit and digest it alternated, and finally modilac transit + modilac first age now. She has always taken its not too bad bottles despite persistent constipation, it happens for him to do his stools by giving him prune juice and a bib of hepar day. The little girl is now 3 months, and in recent weeks she's never-ending bottles, bibs has about 5 150 per day and takes only 120 max, once she's. The little girl is now 3 months, and in recent weeks she's never-ending bottles, bibs has about 5 150 per day and it takes only 120 max, once she's always seréveille night to ask … This alarms my sister she's never-ending bottles and it does not blow his nights. Her pediatrician told her to change the milk of omega3 supplement with Nidal, yet brief change of milk, I do not think that is a good idea to change again milk Me … Have you been in this kind of problems with your baby, what were your solutions? The small gain weight but its power is still quite chaotic …

As long as the bb does not lose weight there is no need to worry.

In my opinion, it does not seem disturbing it does not come his bottle. Everything depends on the child, each is different from each other. My daughter did not finish either of these bottles because a very small appetite, the opposite of his brother, who is a little "greedy" ^ __ ^ After I fully understand that it can worry since a loss of weight mater. and if she was born three weeks before the CCA may be that 150 ml is too much for her? I am in favor of keeping pace with the child, even getting up once at night. At this age, many children still do not harm them. NOTE: Yuna is a very nice name! I really like, very soft and not very long:) (this is the first name of my daughter's dolls ^ __ ^)

yuna able to complete his bib s because it has more foolishly and end all if it does not lose weight it s nya no need to worry about constipation and I've had the big problem with my daughter I did try a lot of meaning something success is the best c him change his milk to milk Transit seeks advice at the pharmacy and if it is too constipated try a glycerin suppository but milk c is already well on my daughter it worked and I Metter suppo if a tummy ache too have courage for your sister's generally does not last long

I also around 3 months my daughter was taking bib's usual 150 ml (4 Bib's) per day is rained during the finishing period and was reduced to only take 120 ml bottle by 5 instead of 4 150mL. It took about 2 / 3 days. The doctor and the pediatrician me both times that she was taking the weight and She grew up there was NO worries ^ ^ She was born nine days ahead of mine, and weighed only 44.5 cm for 2k740g …. Today it has eight months and seven days and everything goes well ^ ^ We must let baby feed his hunger, as we adults are times we do not have too much appetite and a renewed appetite back then …. Well Babies is the same. We must give him his rhythm and a baby (except if it is sick) did not allow himself to die of hunger. His mother can go see your doctor to see if it does not brood a lil 'Virus ^ ^ PS: MA GIRL IS ALSO DOWN DOWN IN WEIGHT IN 3 DAYS PAST SHE IS A BIRTH OF A 2K740G 2K060G ….

Hello, I want to ask you … My son soon to be two months, I breastfeed and take the weight normally starts has always wanting something to eat …. That is to say, that after each feeding, he wants a bottle of water in the mouth …. He then heads barely sleep … I was told that because he is not satisfied …. : (. Is it already happened to one of you? Is this normal or actually, my milk is not enough?? Thank you all for your answers!

if head pain, it should not be hungry … Perhaps he needs the suction to get to sleep? Has a pacifier?

voila I no longer breastfeed my bb milk has 7 months and since yesterday he has nothing he accepts nothing and drank milk or eats canned I went to the doctor he told me directly when they hungry he eats is it true you're passing by??? the problem is not that I want to stop because I no longer suckle milk he thought I was nothing and he eats but he wants to drink milk ….. he eats small pot with evil

I am a father of two girls who took their mother's womb until two years if I can afford a bit of advice is to continue to give him your breast (the emotional side) because the withdrawal is difficult, and next to AC, to give things that are given to eat at that age, you'll be happy and eat it beside …

7 months and he has never eaten anything else? at this age he should already eat vegetables, meat and fish mixed without problem.

agree with your doctor who is right

Hello, Maybe this is a problem of nipple? In effect, suck in the bottle is very different, maybe the teats that you offer "too hard"? My daughter was very lazy to nurse, I have tested almost all brands in the market before finding the + suitable, in this case the NUK. Some babies after feeding categorically refuse the bottle and go directly to the cup. Perhaps he will accept better? Good luck,

I just answered this "When I see all the thumbs down that reaped the mothers not to breastfeed is beyond me. I'm not Mom, but I think each should respect the choice of the other, the choice is breastfeeding or breastfeeding "artificial." A mother who does not breastfeed is not necessarily a bad mother and a mother who breastfeeds is not necessarily a perfect mother ( there are no perfect mothers for that matter). Mothers who do not breast are often criticized, but they may be good reason to breastfeed their baby bottle (baby not sucking at birth, very severe pain in breast milk in quantities too low and so on). When I have children I do not know what breastfeeding (natural or artificial) I choose because I do not know if I can give him the breast, But whatever my choice, I always respect the choices of other mothers what it is, what few mothers are visible here. "this. Cettequestion http://fr.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20100325020448AAzk7tV as to this question appears at the end of this page and will be less available, I relaunched the debate and I welcome your reactions to my response, thank you! @ scorpion: yes, I made my bad sentence … @ others: thank you for your answers, I expect even more! about me, as I have no children some will not be not found my answer very objective, but as I said I respect all the choices, I'm not criticizing or mums "bib" or the mothers' breasts "… and as said so Hawkgirl" better a bottle … "I let you read his response and his beautiful words.

There's no debate, there's just people tolerant and intolerant people.

I read your response. I am breastfeeding, but I am above all for freedom of choice of the mother. What matters to me is that the child and the mother goes well. I'm choosing to breastfeed, I loved the contact with my daughter and know that I gave him the best was very satisfying. Meanwhile, my sister did not breastfeed her two daughters and is his right. By cons what I could take my comments as negative on his part because I breastfeed! Short, I do not put thumbs down for the followers of the bib, I am not a place to judge the merits of their choice, they do not say it enough "better a bottle given with love one breast has reluctantly. Sibline @, with all due respect, I do not see the connection between the question and your screed pro Breastfeeding. Pelagie wants to highlight the fact that non-lactating mothers were often right moult inches below you and us an apology on breastfeeding … Moreover, if the jawbone where you have given birth was not pro-breastfeeding, it is not. Moreover, if the jawbone where you have given birth was not pro-breastfeeding, it is not LECAS everywhere! Tolerance is a two-way and if you want people to respect your choice lactation length, ALSO agrees that women do not want to offer their breasts to their child.

One realizes, in the field of nursing as in another, being pro-choice is always a difficult exercise, where the temptation to fall into the trap of "100%" or "100% cons "is very strong. The trick is not to sink into fundamentalism and trial inquisitor to punch. What many do too often, unfortunately. I'll add that, like a generation born in the 70s and generously showered with baby formula, I'm not dead. The evidence I am still here to write, I am still on my 2 legs, and I have a 3 digit IQ, or not very far ….

Indeed on Yahoo I noticed that the freedom of thought and almost doomed. If it was not the same opinion as everyone thumbs down rain … For my part I consider that there are such to try if a response is good to his question and that's not to judge others. Regarding breastfeeding my baby took the breast poorly and plus I had very little. I pulled my milk I had for 15 days but not more than one bottle per day. I'm glad I could give him my milk that said it was so hard that I breast feed may be more. We must learn to accept the choices of each .

BUT THERE IS NO DEBATE AND IS NOT TO DEBATE. We live in a democracy and we are free to choose their mode of feeding. POINT.

I agree, stop this stupid debate. It is in France and every mother has the right to choose what she wants to breastfeed or not. Breastfeeding is good, it is medically proven and everything but the artificial milk is good quality and are also healthy children. There's much more serious. There are countries where women do not decide anything. Ms. Badinter would do better to fight for them …

You know, since the time I did not even bother to respond. Wading in the meal is not worth it, explain why you've always twisted, I prefer silence, so much absurdity on the subject. Nice idea, thank you!

Honestly I do not think that what happens on this topic on the issue of breastfeeding reflects what happens in real life. It's a personal choice that affects the emotional, the blow on the Net reactions are disproportionate, at least I hope it … I also shocked me to read some sentences pro breastfeeding on this topic. After reflection and now that my girl is here, I realize that I tape Royal. My daughter I gave her the bottle and I'm delighted, I merged with it as if I had given him the breast. Period. And I confess also that those who choose to breastfeed are welcomed at first, but it lasts they are also victims of virulent criticism enough. The criticism is rife in both directions.

Breastfeeding is a natural thing for me that is extremely simple once everything is well formatted. Formerly, women were accompanied to breastfeed, they had the support of their mothers, their aunts, their grandparents mothers, neighbors. So the start on breastfeeding would probably be easier. All women breastfeeding a few exceptions and thus came together to benefit others. There was a baby suckle more if umbilicated nipple we knew the food galactogen to stimulate milk production, it helped the young mother that she sits and she might as well feed in good conditions. Since the 60 years, we encouraged women to stop breastfeeding by saying that it would be liberating. But the lure last only so long. All this knowledge transmission has fortunately not been lost and I tip my hat to associations like the League Leache that support breastfeeding women replacing the mother or the aunt who really knows. Y is there really a choice? "Yes, we pensepouvoir choose, but in the absence of real support, how breastfeeding fail and how successful breastfeeding? Nothing is done to encourage women to breastfeed or continue breastfeeding, even less time to breastfeed, although we often say the opposite and that we do believe otherwise. Must go back to work quickly as 3 months, while it was around 3 months that breastfeeding is just beginning to be well implemented. At the maternity ward, when you say you want to breastfeed, you do not more support they would have us believe. During my stay in the maternity, baby cried and 2 o'clock in the morning, I heard my daughter and did not sleep because I had trouble to give the breast. When the nurse came to see what was happening, she was brutally put in my daughter by forcing her to stay on him pressing his head. And we heard in the distance another baby would not stop crying. And the pediatric nurse rolled her eyes said, "Yeah, it's also a baby. And the pediatric nurse rolled her eyes said, "Yeah, it's also a bébéallaité" by implying that a breastfed baby can not sleep peacefully and style "you're really connes to subject it to your kids. "Then comes the pressure balance where the slightest difference in weight on the scales calls into question the success of your breastfeeding. A breastfed baby is losing weight at first, but it's something normal and yet they tell you this as something wrong and it makes you pinball, and we ask you ultimatums, style if your baby's No Tomorrow has not regained the weight they pass the bottle. When you give him an outright bottle of formula in your back. My stay in that motherhood was a hell where I had to fight constantly reminded forcefully that I did nothing for my daughter that my milk . I have even made sterile bottles in the room. I was put pressure so that I draw from colostrum to breast pumps and had interest enough to learn if they passed my daughter a bottle of formula. So where. Then westerly choice in all this? They must have a moral and steel to be 300% satisfied by breastfeeding, because it runs constantly full of things. Then when your breastfeeding is well established, we'll put even more pressure on you when asking Is what you're thinking of weaning your baby? If you are breastfeeding beyond 6 months, you pass for an alien. I recently heard in a video replayed at the site of the JT France 2 a report on the mothering female pediatric nurse who said it was pathological to want to breastfeed longer. We would'm saying women who do not want to see our children grow.

Breastfeeding is a choice no one discusses this point. But perso je trouve ca false to claim that milk powder is also "good" as breast milk is false. I'm not saying it is bad or harmful, or that children fed with bottles will all be allergic stunted. But we do not deprive me of the idea that these products made by multinationals bring to both children. there is more or less two years of Chinese children have died due to a product component in their milk powder, then the agreement is far from China, they are less stringent controls etc etc but I still tank because after the scandal bottles Advent to biphténol there will be one day the milk Nestl * enriched with hormones. breastfed by my belief (I offer the best of the best for my child) and not by choice.

Anyway whatever you do you are considered, you have not noticed? – When you got kids you're not criticized, you are treated to selfish … – If you have children (especially d 'close ages) you are treated to hen … – If you are breastfeeding you are asked a puzzled look: "Oh you are breastfeeding? And you count how long to breastfeed? not you afraid that you don' t abyss breasts? (Pfffff your bullshit and it does not deteriorate it?!), … "- Or when you're expecting twins and that you intend to breastfeed, you are asked with wide eyes:" You're going to breastfeed them both at the same time?! "- If you do not breastfeed, at any time you're considered a bad mother … And so on, I found that here in France and even now in 2010 there are still many people who are intolerant and disrespectful. It's pathetic! But everyone puree (e) mixes his c **! Pelagie Thanks for this question j'étoilise. Come on, one more star for you, I wish you much that you had a child. Bizette the dindonautes!

I recently saw a news story, where mothers breastfeed their infants until 3-4years … then I think there is a problem, anyway! After the women are what they seem, for their child point bar. The only thing I think is that those who do not breastfeed, will never know, this small privileged moment, indescribable, which is simply one between mother and baby.

I have several things to say. You write "when I see all the thumbs down that reaped the mothers not to breastfeed is beyond me." I expected to find lots of answers "anti-breastfeeding" riddled with thumbs down. So I went to read everything. It is 19h25, there are 16 responses, 16 responses posted, so none was removed and the 16 responses, only 1 is "not for" breastfeeding (which by the way is stupid, we might want or not wanting to breastfeed, but for or against a natural phenomenon that is anything, it's like being for or against earthquakes or the flight of birds). short! Only one answer on 16! Your sentence is not appropriate at all … This answer has collected 12 inches below (including my own stupidity for the double response) and 8 inches high (like how there are still quite ignorant to believe that formula milk equates milk and can be for or against. But I hate is this famous sentence etrabaissante completely hypocritical. I think everyone should be free to do whatever he wants without being judged and receive all the help they need, whatever their choice. We can only note that this is not the case. We made the big eyes of mothers who breastfeed and not be demoralized lactating. The medical staff is not trained and knows nothing about breastfeeding. It tells a lot of nonsense and its single solution for all problems is "weaning and give the bib. Hawkgirl, good for you if you got all the help you needed to maternity, but being Nursing godmother in real life and frequenting this site for several years, I can only see that you're the only one, unfortunately … I recall that does not help a mother to breastfeed, a physician violates not Only the Charter of Rights of the Child in May as the Hippocratic oath. I am in nursing long term (21 months) and since I was almost always drunk with "should stop thinking," she. I'm a long lactation period (21 months) and since I was almost always drunk with "should stop thinking", "elletète encooooooooooore !!!", etc. … At this point I stopped nursing in public. Has anyone ever seen a mother hiding in to the bottle? Furthermore, we see lots of stories extremes that do not reflect reality (the mother who forced his 7 year old son to suck). Full of anti-breastfeeding figures are publicized and stigmatize the act: everyone knows that compares Elizabeth Badinter in one of his interviews with the nursing chimpanzees, while advocating tolerance. And Marcel Rufo has become his daily broadcast on public television and says that breastfeeding more than 3 months is unhealthy and leads to serious psychological disorders in the baby … Do you know a single person pro-public breastfeeding? All that to say that currently in France, we must not delude ourselves and it is actually much more difficult to breastfeed more than 3 weeks bottle feeding. Still, it is supposed to live in a free country and there is always someone to find fault with our. Still, it is supposed to live in a free country and there is always someone to find fault with noschoix is super boring! Assume our choice Allaiton, give the bottle, nurturing us, respect us , support us, we love … Peace and love!

The response has been a lot of inches below suggests that industrial milk powder Gold = milk is a lie and I believe is misinformation. I have long nursed my daughter, my best friend did the has ever done and we get along very well! We are all mothers before and I completely respect the choice of every mother to breastfeed or not. However, I jumped when I hear that the milk industry is just as good (or better …) than breast milk because is simply false. Contrary to what you believe, virtually nothing is done to encourage or help mothers who want to breastfeed: no specific follow-through support for breastfeeding single motherhood really well trained to subject (parade of different midwives giving conflicting advice), maternity leave is too short … As the eyes of others: yes, it is "in" and saw to nurse a few weeks but when you breastfeed longer it quickly becomes an object of curiosity! In France, the breast is. As compared to other: yes, it is "in" and saw to nurse a few weeks but when you breastfeed longer it quickly becomes an object of curiosity! In France, breast estbeaucoup equated with sexuality when a mother nursing a baby "too old", people are beginning to find it disturbing if not unhealthy child … Breastfeeding is a natural act first and to create a wonderful relationship with his child. In France, we often feel that it is bottle-feeding is a natural act … therefore it seems important to support mothers who wish to breastfeed by providing advice and access to the site of La Leche League.

Hello, I would like to begin by saying that this is a neutral question, not opening the debate for or against breastfeeding. I am not looking for propaganda or persuasion, I would just simply a factual answer. I think there are a lot of breastfeeding information (internet, books, etc.), but it is difficult see, for me, impossible to find out what happens when a woman makes the choice / can not breastfeed her baby. I heard there is a medical need to start a few weeks before childbirth to stop producing milk. Is this true? Is there someone who can explain how not to breastfeed? PS Please do not tell me to ask this question to my gynecologist – I just go there and I will not make another appointment, nor the call, just for that. PPS I know this is a controversial topic, so I repeat: This is a neutral question, not opening the debate for or against breastfeeding. I am not looking for propaganda or. I am not looking for propaganda or by persuading, I would just simply a factual answer. Thanks.

Yes, there is actually a treatment to be taken to prevent, stop the flow of milk. No emergency, you will pay it at the time of delivery. Breastfeed or not is a personal choice, I do not see where is the controversy.

I did not breastfeed. I got tablets from birth to halt the flow of milk. If I remember correctly, I even took me several postpartum.

If you do not want to breastfeed your baby after delivery you must take pills to cut your milk.

how can you not want to start a deba with your question?? my case I 3semaines fight with my son who prefer to starve rather than to latch on! That is my answer!! ago after the nipple that does not allow breastfeeding is my aunt who is in case! y'en then have to indecsent c which is an object of pleasure and therefore finds that this falls of incest (a colleague of mine!) if not in my culture you must give at least 2 years in so I will not say the criticism that j'me takes in the mouth! voila I think I said everything!

my personal case: I tried feeding the first 4 days following the birth of my son. I had a very long labor and difficult (27h), and followed a s'ne pos natal depression since the 3rd day. at the end of 4th day, still no rise in milk (and yet I was taking pills and made me accelerate the movement by an electric shooter (nothing glamorous ..)). I gave up at the end of the 4th day, reluctantly, but relieved to pass the bib. at that time I had treatment to prevent the rise of milk and stop lactation. priori therefore, it will be post delivery you'll get that treatment.

There are drugs if you do not breastfeed at all, if you only want to stop almost immediately, the ideal is to offer the bottle to the baby as it flows more easily most babies lose interest quickly womb.

You're part of your desire not to breastfeed motherhood just after childbirth we will give adequate treatment to stop the flow of milk. This treatment is not given ahead of delivery since the rise of milk is done once the child is born. There is no decision to wear now breastfeed or not is a choice. I breastfed because I wanted my sister has totally refused breastfeeding. Whatever your choice, it will be good for your child.

There is a medoc to be taken after childbirth to stop the flow of milk

Yes it gives you a good Medoc but even when I had a little milk for a few tps

http://www.natur-enfant.com/produit.php?ref=105-11&id_rubrique=20

I unfortunately left breast that after 3 days and I had a stamp to take 2-3 a day for 15d.

Women do not wish to breastfeed take medication to stop the flow of milk. I am unable to say how long it should take, but I am almost certain that there is no precaution beforehand. Normally, anyway, if baby is not feeding, you should not have mounted milk or longer. However, as each woman is unique, I imagine that the drug is used to eliminate bottlenecks in the case of a woman who is not breastfeeding and still produce milk.

I have not breastfed have been compressed to motherhood (bromokin) for 15 days and then resumed pill. there is nothing to be done before the birth of my knowledge. cons by avoiding over-stretching your nipples to From the 7th month of pregnancy it seems that it promotes the flow of milk, a cousin dixit

At what point THERE Islam considers that abortion is forbidden?

request your quarry Christianity also prohibits the Judaism and before him … and for your information and abortion is still a crime .. proves the contrary as long as all precautions (protective drugs) exists, then paula, if you seek compliance, not with this kind of question!

my respects first. for such an important issue must address people's fetwa. ie imams and not any.

Muslim scholars are unanimous in saying that after the four-month limit abortion is haram (forbidden) "The basic rule regarding abortion ban. This prohibition is growing according to progress and fetal development. Thus, during the first forty days of pregnancy, the ban is the lightest. Therefore, abortion is allowed in such cases for good reasons. After period of forty days, the ban becomes stronger, the abortion will be tolerated for reasons more serious (compared to the previous step), which grounds will be determined by persons skilled in the "Fiqh". And ban and continue to grow "(El Karadawi President of the International Union of Muslim Scholars)

pose your question on the radio in the morning abou abd essalam you repents he has hoteur things and not my dear friendly

http://www.muslimfr.com/modules.php?file=article&name=News&sid=158

He said he must see it made its abortive H'mar Or ahlimababi his friend Salafi imam of the mosque souna will answer you

Simple question: How to translate the word "curette" in Arabic?

're not affected by Islam, so why ask such a question.?

Abortion is permitted from the moment he is the probable risk confirmed by experts on the life and health of women.

ok, no problem and I think it must be the wish of all

respect

Related Blogs

• Myths About A Job Search You Should Take Into Consideration | Acai …
• CFP: WiG 2010 – Workshops: The Changing Job Market (Augusta, MI …
• Looking a Job How To [Work from Home] In This Economy [Make Money …

http://www.revoltes.net/spip.php?article … The European Medicines Agency (EMEA) has issued its first "Weekly pharmacovigilance" on the massive vaccination 3/12/2009. The EMEA is not a model of transparency, according to the magazine "Prescribe" and yet we learn that about 5.7 million people vaccinated with Pandemrix we deplore 55 deaths, 24 serious adverse events related motherhood (abortions, intrauterine deaths, stillbirths, fetal hypokinesis and premature births), 6 Guillain-Barre (3 confirmed), a rejection of heart transplants, and 2301 reports indicate 6269 side effects more or less serious. But fortunately, none of these dramas seem to have any correlation with immunization in the hours that preceded it, according to the EMEA. His French counterpart, the Afsapps, has published its latest newsletter pharmacovigilance influenza A vaccine (H1N1) on the same day: "From October 21 until November 29. His French counterpart, the Afsapps, has published its latest newsletter pharmacovigilance of vaccines influenza A (H1N1) on the same day: "From October 21 to 29 November2009, approximately 860 000 doses of vaccine were administered PANDEMRIX d 'First to personal health, medical and social emergency hospitals, and from November 12, 2009 certain categories of priority in vaccination centers dedicated. "During this period, the Afsapps received" 562 reports side effects (499 by health professionals and 63 by patients), a notification rate of around 0.5 per 1000 doses administered.. These reports relate "a total of 1377 adverse reactions occurred within hours of vaccination." There were "48 adverse reactions whose intensity has led to a functional impairment and / or a temporary disability such as influenza-like illness, pain at the site of 'injection, tingling of the extremities, dizziness, joint pain, transient elevations of arterial blood pressure and facial paralysis under investigation. "and, in total, 16. And a total of serious 16cas and death, "for which he claims was a natural death." Compare the numbers: EMEA Afsapps vaccinees 5 700 000 860 000 reports of side effects in 2301 (0.040%) 562 (0.065%) nb side effects reported 6269 1377 Guillain-Barre 3 0 deaths 55 (a bad day on 100 000, approximately) 0 (no risk) The problem of pharmaco-vigilance is obvious: the 860 000 vaccinations in France we would have expected "8.6" notifications of deaths in the hours following injection. But there was one, and it was a "natural death", so no link with the vaccine. One of two things: either the secondary and has the effect Pandemrix unexpected delay of a few days a dozen deaths per million injections, only France, (which would, does not , Roselyne? one more good reason to prescribe this panacea) … or we have in France, a serious problem in pharmacovigilance "Serious problems. either we have in France, a serious problem in pharmacovigilance! depharmacovigilance Serious problems must be noted that here the facts confirm the opinion of pharmacovigilance expert Dr. Marc Girard data post-marketing of vaccines are well " sealed by a sub-normal mass notification further encouraged by the authorities. " Dr. Marc Girard warning for weeks about the side effects observed in preliminary tests, including "7 deaths and several cases of autoimmune hepatitis in children." (26/11/2009) FR3 showed in a newscast France map of cases of influenza A/H1N1 "all red" and relayed an official message like "going to sting you and your kids before the Apocalypse!" …

nobody knows what to do … there qd even had more than 100 deaths due to influenza A. .. and the vaccine problem, so we are asked to choose, somehow, between the plague and cholera ….

Your figures it's anything "vaccinees 5 700 000 860 000": 5700 billion! We are a little over 6 billion people on the planet! Unless we also vaccinate pigs and aliens, we are far from "When we saw it, given how even the slightest credence to the rest of the text, its author and those who spread?

I am vaccinated and vaccinated my son is 18 years it is 15 days we had nothing to report except a slight fever at 38 for my son for a night around me and no complications to report to the — am health!

One death reported per 100 000 injections Pandemrix in Europe is at least 10 to 15 times more than expected according to a study published in October 2009 in the "Lancet" on the number of deaths expected after vaccination. Fortunately, France, the pharmacovigilance data are "reassuring": no deaths were reported. That serious side effects are 10 times more common in Europe, "with adjuvants, the United States where squalene is not prohibited alter: "do you bite," says the TV! What sissy, these Americans, they had even adopted a vaccination campaign with 20 times fewer deaths reported in 1976 and what a joy to live in a democracy in a free country, with solid barriers that prevent radioactive clouds returned and viruses out when they have already gone to our neighbors! Unless they take us for …. • Hold on "The Post", a blogger had taken our products, citing. • Hold on "The Post", a blogger had taken our articles, citantsoigneusement both the AFP agency reports pharmacovigilance that we cited: censored! The article has disappeared. It was there http://www.lepost.fr/article/2009/12/12/1837693_vaccination-au-pandemrix-contre-la-grippe-a-h1n1-55-signalements-de-deces-passes-sous- If silence_0_3151696.html think like Dr. Marc Girard and seem like the show the first official figures, the side effects summers dramatically underestimated, LIVES ARE IN DANGER! So thank you for asking this question, and thank you to you all to copy and mail the file to PDF, downloadable http://www.revoltes.net/spip.php?article1700 and make known the facts carefully and cited "sources" in these documents Below: You never know …

Related Blogs

• FuseboxLA And The Los Angeles County Department Of Public Health …
• H1N1 vaccination registration closes for semester
• KidRow » Blog Archive » More H1N1 vaccination clinics