A Question For Christians Who Are Against Abortion?
Friday, June 25th, 2010While My question is to appear provocative but not meant to shock: since Jesus said that "many are called but few are chosen" (Matthew 22:14) (Act of predestination for access Heaven or Hell cited in other biblical passages which Apocalypse 3.5 "whose names were not written from the foundation of the world in the book of life") is that mothers who have abortions do not involuntary service for babies, (according to the Christian perspective which holds that eternal soul exists at conception the fetus) because they will not know ever on earth or physical or mental suffering and even have the chance to be directly received in paradise without going through the earth and its constraints, and they do not have to choose between good and evil and have never had the opportunity to commit the sins including one who was appointed by Jesus "unforgivable ? Even if abortion is considered murder, to paraphrase a verse from Ecclesiastes a
The end does not justify the means. If I kill someone out of a confessional one could also say that I committed a good deed by sending the repentant sinner directly to heaven before he falls back into its habitual sins. Also Nothing says that children who die without baptism go to heaven. Is it fair that they do not suffer in hell, they do not necessarily enjoy the beatific vision.
as Jesus said (Matthew 12:32) [...] but whoever speaks against the Holy Spirit, it will not be forgiven him, no, neither in this system of things in it or who is coming . it is for God to resurrect the fetus but that does not guarantee they are not fishing against the spirit of the devil did not need to be on earth to fish rather than to endure the suffering of this world more likely to understand what evil is and reject it forever because he will have experienced
According to TJ, the soul is mortal. "When we die we know anything." Abortion is an unnatural end, provoked and decided. The end of an unborn life. "Thou shalt not kill" is one of the first commandments. Murder is murder, no matter when it occurs. Personally, I think that even if the abortion is happier, which is not certain, however, the woman who was not happy with her gesture. She lives with a bad conscience and a trauma for a hell of a time.
If religion took over the unfortunate, the abortion issue would not arise. The issue arises when the child is born of rape, incest or the accident. In these cases, it is not desired. Whether it is the biblical or evangelical, they have been written by men. The Gospels do not even say inspired by God's Word live (which could be expected already at the time put into question the Bible written without ink or paper therefore memory, a type remained perched talk with God for 2 years without eating or drinking). Jesus never asked the celibacy of priests, for example, and yet it is an accepted dogma. It has harmed the Catholic Church since pedophilia is linked to this practice. That said, the West prohibits child marriage. Other countries have adopted other laws where the young child can be married against her will at any adult male. It is obvious that I do not answer your question because being for abortion is in itself a negation of. Obviously I do not answer your question because being for abortion is in itself a negation of woman and I am therefore for the practice. Birth to a child without the means to make him happy is criminal. Those that prohibit abortion must take their theories and ensure the happiness of the unborn. I am sure that the number of abortions would decrease significantly if the critics offered a credible response. Ban is to give equal opportunities to all. Forbid you to steal me because am forbidden to steal for the social life is possible. Abortion is an individual story because the woman is left alone with his burden, yet the child has a father! One who is born without an earthly father called Jesus and he is in heaven now, to the right of God, what is more!
Rather complicated question. I do not want to write a novel so I'd very short. The issue of abortion in my opinion is a matter of interpretation of the Bible and morality. unless I am not aware (I agree to be guided). Because the breath of life is received when? before or after birth? Life is physiologic for a fetus, not spiritual. And thus the soul that would integrate the human in his first breath (at birth), will simply go elsewhere, or just wait it will not. I think interpretation of life, the correlation between the spiritual and physiological in humans are too late or will never be known for that man can debate about this is two completely different logic and it will not discuss with human logic. So, from this perspective for me the mothers who have abortions do not render involuntary service to anyone. I remember that I am a Catholic and against abortion, but not dramatically, and for reasons of morality.
Would you say that you are unhappy to exist on Earth and had been better than your mother avortât you? I do not think we should implement your reasoning on another person for an answer. See for yourself. You can always correct the mistake made by your mother giving you birth. For the rest, everyone is predestined to choose the side with or without God. The Lord said: "Is what I want the death of sinner course not, but he changes lanes and live. "This is eternal life or death = where their worm does not die … dixit Jesus.
Not being a believer I believe simply that abortion is a step forward for women and it would be criminal to jeopardize …