Do not tell me that a sperm has no soul alive! @ Sylbao For you avoid answering a spermatozoon has no soul. @ You've reached is there to kill a chick in the egg? It is the same thing!
And therefore, an ejaculation is a genocide? In these conditions all humanity is guilty, but what exactly?
then I will join the paradise of bacteria and viruses, in this case.
Play on words if you please, the fact is that it is against the law to kill a human being. Now, we know when an embryo becomes a human being. The law provides an answer, we now have to judge their eligibility. An abortion is not an arbitrary act, but can we tolerate that women are not masters of their destiny through prohibition? There are still forty anyway abortions, take all this and provide a legal and health to the practice. This finding goes hand in hand with other social issues!
if so and even after the blow to vacuum it will mount directly to paradise ..
You better hypocritically prefer that your daughters birth under X, honor Judeo-Christian will be safe, let me laugh ,,,,, and tell you that I at least I fought for the right to abortion, soul is just an excuse of religion,
This is not a "murder" than to eliminate a pile of cell formation. This is not an arbitrary act, too, agree. But the embryo is still part of the body of the mother, who was free on him. It's very strange, I've never seen someone who was going to believe that sperm has a soul. And the egg too?
To each his freedom and his responsibility!
@ Odette, I know some Christians who support abortion as I know of lay hardcore, eaters of priests opposed to abortion because they consider excessive "When you know that some couples can not adopt and that some women or Sterile men have to be (e) s. As said Celine abortion is our kids and we take pity on our mutt! @ Odette, hehe, you disappoint me, you who often dragged into the category philosopher, with shortcuts to arrive amalgams as cheesy! You obviously have never read Céline your life! When you know that Celine even treated Hitler Jew!
ODETTE @:::: to each his own conscience you're no better than n those who think otherwise,,,, c is a good question you can fight for everything and no matter what it does not make you a person who holds the I ca tell truth without wickedness and I likes people who think about this kind of subject
The sperm has no soul because it has to be joined to an egg to produce a human. Only after fertilization we must consider that commits homicide by removing the created by it, and therefore that all abortion is one. Indeed, there is indeed a clear distinction between being resulting from the fertilization of an ovum and a sperm and each of these elements. However, we could not establish a real distinction between the different stages of development of a living being. Saying that abortion is not a crime because it affects only a cluster of cells, ie a being unconscious, may give ammunition to those who would kill someone for his sleep after all During this time, there is no more conscious than an embryo. This could therefore allow any abuse services to special interests at the expense of those who are not considered quite "aware". And is it not the glory of a civilization to defend the weak before the strong? As. And is it not the glory of a civilization to defend the weak before the strong? Quantal two other arguments very often to defend abortion, they leave just as easily refuted: that abortion is legal, because the embryo belongs to his mother, is confused inclusion relation and relationship membership, it does not mean that we belong to a house because it is inside of it! And pretend that women who have unwanted children are aborted as well for their sake and for that of their child, which could not be reared in good conditions is to invoke conditions that are extrinsic to the nature of the act that sought to declare: that logic, it is equally justify infanticide, when parents become unemployed, or even physical extermination of people without resources. And yet no one defends it, because we know that these situations can be treated with humanity, including the establishment of an adequate social protection system. So when we also know that many people want to adopt. So when we also know that many people want to adopt Lesenfants they did not have this latter justification of abortion also falls.
The sperm do not think so. The egg does not think so. The egg-cell does not think so. A fetus is not yet a person, he has no identity: he does not know his name, date of birth, place of birth, name of his mother, his mother's face, much less the name and face of his father. In addition, changes in the brain are in the last days before birth, so as is a fetus, no problem of conscience. Indeed, a fetus is not killed, as it is not fully alive (not alive in the scientific sense, but in the social and psychological sense). In comparison, it costs a little someone to unplug one in a coma, but someone who has no name, no identity, which has seen nothing, done nothing at all … The memories will never go back until 4-5 years that the age stated that they recalled before, we merely imagine. This proves that identity is formed later. Then, it can ruin their future, but it can also avoid ruining the future of the father, mother and child!
The question as to when the baby has a soul is frankly hypocritical. I have nothing against abortion, in a sense it is a tool of social control that allows women to maintain a modicum of control over part of their existence in which they sometimes lack … But with a minimum of lucidity we can very well imagine that the argument of "my body belongs to me" would have no recourse in a hypothetical ideal world where rape would not exist and where contraception would be trivial and systematic manner when required. The fact is that it just seems more logical to focus on a being alive and palpable as a small piece of flesh barely alive who has not been named yet … On a hypocrite consensus we accept this sacrifice for the order and benefit the greatest number, but out of pity that one ceases to look for ethical-metaphysical justification for this act, which then goes to explain that the ex-mothers-to-be that they have no reason to cry over their fate because they have failed to nothing but a piece of meat …
Yes abortion is a crime to be innocent without a cutter défonce.Sauf if there is a problem.