I remind everyone that the ITG is very different from abortion. It is here for comfort or desire, but the fate of an abnormal child. God does have something to say about it? What do the believers?

a medical case

It is a matter of conscience for parents. Sometimes one is tempted to replace the term "therapeutic" with that of eugenics (in the spirit of "political" in any case), it still flies in the human mind the idea perfect for a race where there would be "abnormal" (but who is really normal in this world where there would ???), more diseases. You want roses without thorns, clementines Seedless, encouraging the idea of a perfect world, which should contain nothing untoward. The problem is in fact that man is himself the "unfortunate" Chief of the creation, while at the same time its ultimate peak. Wonder what will become of this supposed child abnormal, when parents are gone is a recurring argument. It is not based on trust, on faith in God. What is foolish in the world, that's what God has chosen … God speaks without hindrance from the mouths of children known abnormal … Wondering if this being designed, in most cases, the love. To ask whether this be conceived, in most cases, the amourmanifesté between two adults, has no specificity to give the world did not have a message, different and unique. Yet parents have to decide through a thorough discernment and enter into no guilt whatsoever in relation to medical authorities or religious bodies as they wish. Any decision taken involves a faith in one case as in another will have consequences that must be assumed (in trust in the God of love for believers). Through your question, you feel that you tilt to the ITG. You can do that with this choice you are today and you will probably your best, but am now supported by objective and reasonable people, having enough sense to be open to both points of view without trying to influence your choice. You 're not alone in this dilemma … whatever your decision.

Case of religion or conscience matter of conscience … But the consciousness (and ethical legislation it is the reflection group) is influenced by the philosophical, moral, and therefore particularly religious. And abortion and ITG are not "very different" in my opinion, not fundamentally anyway. First the "T" for "therapeutic" is misleading since I found incongruous to call "therapy", so carefully, the action is to cause death. Then we're in for comfort more advanced, since it is often the fear of not being able to take a disabled child (financially, physically, emotionally, morally …) leading to it. A comfort to the wider society: it is an unspoken, perhaps, but there is still a tendency to think that if one spends so valuable in our taxes to screen for trisomy (for example) that 's is not to repay back to an abnormal child … If so, this is a concept in the background in many design. If so, this is a notion in the background in many design depolitique public health. The invocation of eugenics by @ dance your life is entirely justified. Where I agree, c 'question is that the fate of an abnormal child (assuming you know what normalcy, a concept quite obvious in "macro" but that escapes into the intricacies and complexities of the human when you want to refine it). God, if there is one, probably has something to say above, except we do not know how to listen so it's tricky. Anyone who has never a word to say is that the child is born … not leave Who can decide for himself if his life has value? "The topic is difficult, and there is no question of judging those who make certain choices, I do not think better and would not do the morning if I were facing a very direct way. What I am certain that he would take better care of more serious cases involving children difficult than increasing antenatal diagnosis whose end is undoubtedly eugenics – a word that leaves. What I am certain that he would take better care of more serious cases involving children difficult than increasing antenatal diagnosis whose end is undoubtedly eugenics – a word that laissepersonne also significant, and because (in my opinion).

Stephanie of Monaco or Angela Merkel … Your choice! ——->

It is obvious pk you asking this question?

is a birth of a new arrival: a baby.

Anything! Abortion is seen as a crime only by enlightened, fortunately many of the medical professions are very much in favor of this medical procedure, and does not consider the "crime".

Those who believe this are in fact large illuminated. Qd to those who think like those "doctors" are worse than they are seriously sick.

and miscarriage manslaughter?

this pregnancy it causes no risk to mother and new born to me c 1 crime, "like putting an end to a life of another (the baby) may be (he or she) someone important in society.

I will not debate whether abortion is a crime or not. The only thing I know is that abortion is always an ordeal for the woman who suffered (for whatever reasons). This is a test they will until the end of their days, they have children or not. Sometimes I read on Yahoo that women did this just for trivial reasons, those who advance these theories are people who have never experienced this event.

It's still a living being. and they see this as taking the life of a being. other means of contraception like the pill or condom, are invented to avoid the conception of a child. there are people who spend their time in laboratories doing research, and the goal is to provide the best solutions and means. and not take the life of an unborn baby. even I admit that sometimes it was not much choice. or other moyenque abortion. and must of course be voluntary, because otherwise it is regarded as a crime

according to what doctors? sources, articles supported, thank you @ chopin, nearly 40% of abortions are due to a failure of contraception (condom that broke, pill or IUD failed) plus it is true that the number of abortions n has not declined since the law Veil, about 200 000 per year, however, I invite you to watch the growth of the female population in France since the early 70s and you will see that contrary to what we think the number abortion has declined since the law

Some doctor's con ago beep everywhere

"Under advice of doctors," you're wrong, it's not the doctors who consider it a crime simply for them to terminate a pregnancy, it's not as rewarding as making a heart operation for example . And it pays less too. The only ones who think abortion is a crime are people with ideas rather low ceiling, who think that freedom of the woman is worth nothing, and if ele is pregnant, c 'is his fault, and it aplus assume that, even if it means raising a child unhappy or no father or no family at all … Abortion is a decision not to take lightly, yes it is a living embryo is destroyed, but do not exaggerate, it's not as if we killed a 2 year old child who has learned to develop his intelligence. Abortion right, and rightly so! Fortunately, our mothers and grandmothers have fought for it, thank you to them!

the heart beats of an embryo after 21days for me it was then that the "life" begins not at birth is now known that the links are formed before birth, the baby feels listening and feeling well before the birth! abortion is a crime for me if it's after the 21premiers days but this is my opinion! I will not deal with criminal sincerely hope you and your unborn child that is not screwed up for reasons that you do this! must know that people have an abortion as if doing piercings! it is a shame to have made 2 see 3 abortion is really disgusting! it has you take the pill or anything I know. The child did not suffer. I can be a crank if you like but know that you're not better at least I assume my responsibility and I know what I mean I had a little boy 16 years, I assumed and I find it shameful that a woman of 30 years, does not!

It is still men who save lives, they're heroes who care for sick and when they give advice that is not yours you throw their bananas in the face! They are better placed than you to issue an opinion on the matter, if they say it's a murder there must be a reason. It has made the hunt clinical practice euthanasia, saying that they looked more closely at the dead "soft" does not exist, so do not talk when you are not level, will play with those of your age or your intellectual level instead.

Not all doctors since they are the ones who make them. . .

According to some people, abortion is murder, child. I'm half agree. Yes, it is murder, but it is a murder to crush a microscopic cell, because it is alive. But as the thing has killed no conscience, murders are forgiven. Yet, we kill many animals! So ultimately, I can understand that is against abortion if it is vegetarian, even if I hole it is worse to kill an adult animal with a minimum of consciousness than to kill something which does has not.

@ Chopin: recourse to abortion is sometimes an act far more responsibly than lead, in some cases, a pregnancy to term. A woman aged 30 or over may also have good reasons to use a girl of 15 years. No woman n'avorte by comfort, and even less for pleasure, regardless of age … Also, remember that women who underwent 2, 3 or more abortions are very rare. Most women who have had abortions have done only once during their lives. It is not yours to judge their choices, nor does it belong to us to judge of yours …

For me it's a crime because the first thing that grows in you and a heart that's protecting you avoid his murder.

is not that doctors who believed ca I also say that those who are ca c est criminals except for some who have no choice of course bye

because if want to have children we take head pills precautions Tops … in exceptional cases I understand abortion is better than ill-mannered child but I speak for rape cases rare as it rarely gets pregnant with the pills now women having fun right at the left without worrying about the hop ' Hospital and Embryo to oblivion because ladies want to have fun and do not want to be distorted but they will not think before

being 6 months pregnant I live near Benfeld I loved obernai given birth but I was advised I would have liked to know what type of maternity and birth then what was the most suited for my type of pregnancy pregnancy twin thank you for your reply

I also had twins. I am not familiar with your area but the criteria on which you ought to base it must be in the clinic: – a neonatal center that has a good reputation in the monitoring of premature and low birth weight – surgeons skilled in various fields-obstetricians specializing in high-risk pregnancies and, finally, that the obstetrician gynecologist has also trained surgeon.

All the maternity sont.aucune in my opinion a principle more than others.

I think that your gynecologist is the person best placed to learn about the subject.

I advise you BETHESDA, Strasbourg, Place de Haguenau

Related Blogs

• Pipe Dream » Blog Archive » MZ and Estrella
• rich boy – “top of the world”
• “males shouldn't be jealous…”