Rocco has the cock.

Ru421. Beware, it can be very dangerous and it should be taken only under medical supervision in a hospital. In addition to the risk of bleeding, a lot of organs can blow up a lead (liver, kidney, heart …). If you manage to get worry, you're going to the hospital immediately after taking it. If you have a body that has known problems, you do not take. Otherwise, there are the old birth control pills: take 2 times daily for one week. It is 100% effective up to 2 or 3 days after unprotected intercourse. A week later, there are risks that it does not work. It causes the rules. The best known in France Stediril. Messing around on this subject, it's also messing with his health.

hello, the abortion pill is myfégine, I work in a medical practice, the five doctors, a practice only because it was trained, and I make the order to the pharmacy of the drug and it takes at once

You should not ask this question because from what I see is that you do not intend to get it without prescription. And you do not realize that this can be very dangerous to decide yourself the time … Know that the embryo at 21d of his life his heart is already beating her and your circulatory system that has formed to kill him and be a real crime! And know also that although so many people looking for children but can not have .. We can not afford to choose who should live and grow and must stop his life even before the start to think ………

Hello, I guess the answer to my question is very simple, but I was not very attentive during SVT, a few years earlier … I should have! I'm 15, my girlfriend is 16 and we have for 5 months, with a condom. But she told me today that a two-week delay in its rules. I know that these cycles are not very regular and it tends to have periods of 31-32 days. I know absolutely nothing about the conduct, there is no question, either for itself or for me to have a child, at least, not at our age. I am particularly concerned, tell me please to have the reactions, if abortion is the answer, tell you that I am completely ignorant in this area, thank you! In brief: Should we abort? Is there a pill? Clarification, if my girlfriend is pregnant, she has been for a month or two. Thank you very much for me (us) to answer, and put an end to our anxiety, telling us which path to choose. Thank you!

educate yourself and marry the child with the help of your parents, if there is a pregnancy. good luck:)

Listening to the last disc Franck Mickael.

go to Planned Parenthood in your area they will be more aptent in responding.

Ben already makes it a pregnancy test … it may just be a delay of rules. and if the result is positive, go check with family planning. It's free, anonymous, and you'll get all the answers. http://www.planning-familial.org/ouverture.php (top left you type your department to find the center nearest you). good luck

We can in no way tell you what to do, only you. In my opinion, your girlfriend should start by doing a pregnancy test, it is useless to panic if you do not even know if she is really pregnant or not. Then, if that is indeed the case, I suggest you take a ride in a family planning where people will be able to tell you what your possibilities. Good luck!

The only solution if your girlfriend is really pregnant and you do not want this child (which makes sense for your age) is abortion! We must quickly know if your girlfriend is pregnant or not because it is better to abort as soon as possible and there are steps to take, among others, you will pass a psychologist … And then, ask your girlfriend to take the pill, it will avoid such problems!

I have a friend who is in a similar situation. You must make an appointment with a gynecologist. Preferably as soon as possible, because if she is pregnant over 12 weeks she will no longer abortion because abortion is illegal after 12 weeks in France. FYI it is legal after 12 weeks in Belgium / Netherlands.

While we have yet found anything better than abortion to practice eugenics under the guise of humanism (malformed children, genetic defects, the mother of poverty, etc. …). Question a little provocative, but deserves consideration on its merits. @ Jay Casimir Where do you see an opposition? On the contrary, they complement. @ Jay Casimir You're confusing eugenics and neonaticide. One example: why do we see less and less with DS in our societies? Just because the medicine can detect this genetic abnormality before birth, and indeed they are aborted. This is called an abortion therapeuthic. Question: who is this therapeuthic? Not for the fetus, since it does not live! For the human race then? If this is not eugenics that, what is it? @ Francis The idea came from the Malthusian, I think. @ Sonnen There is no time limitation for IMG. And I know that despite their disabilities disability are happy to live. A fetus with a disability is as innocent as a fetus that is. A fetus with a disability is as innocent as a fetus n'estpas disabled. No? The abortion because it is believed that his disability is a burden on society, it is eugenics. No?

I do not know anyone who is serious for both eugenics and cons of abortion. These are the results of two opposing doctrines, in my opinion. @ Al: Being in eugenics, that killed at birth. Being against abortion is saying yes to life. Incompatibility, I think.

The man and his paradoxes …

Excellent question, thank you. For my part I am not for eugenics, but for abortion THE SOLE DISCRETION OF CONCERNED (not a social problem but an individual problem), in extreme cases such as rape, risk of death for Mom, trisomy or other serious risk to the baby. I am opposed to abortion in other cases. We have enough means of contraception in order to manage a priori the birth rate. @ Sonnen, tests are performed on the 3rd month for trisomy … and abortion can be performed.

Can. We can do everything. Like, for example, be against abortion on a right to life of an embryo (and human life is sacred, even in pregnancy) but advocate the death penalty. And for good human beings this time.

The ideology of extreme right opened the eradication of naturally disadvantaged people "especially for health reasons" in World War II shows! And just after the war the abuser of women has been institutionalized. Instead of aborting women why not castrate men! if only medically

I'm actually in this case: Currently abortion is primarily for reasons of convenience: parents do not feel how to accommodate an additional child, single mother and not for eugenic reasons. If it detects a case of trisomy in the 6th month of pregnancy, not miscarried. Many orphan diseases are detected too late for an abortion. Now I'm sorry, but a healthy child can live a happy life with adoptive parents. It should rather refer mothers who do not take care of a child to abandonment. In contrast, children with disabilities, especially in the case of multiple disability or mental disability will be miserable all their lives and will load all their lives for their parents and society. I am not opposed to the coup de grace when he was the only decent solution … @ Almire: A serial killer is a noxious: the felling is to save his future victims. By contrast a baby is a totally innocent man who has committed no crime to deserve the death that you want it. By contrast a baby is a totally innocent man who has committed no crime to deserve the death that you want luiinfliger. I notice the illogic of the supporters of the killing of babies that are to safeguard the lives of murderers @ AL: quite, I said initially I am in favor of eugenics, but not to abortion reasons of personal convenience or financial. What is the most common case today. I would add that it depends on the disability. If we can sail, we can offer him a life about right, but I'm talking multiple disabilities: http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polyhandicap there is more generous to offer her a quick death.

And those against the 2? I do. Against abortion (not tell me of abortions in rape cases this represents only 2% of abortions) and against any form of eugenics. However I am for IMG in case of severe disabilities. In the kind that would prevent the person from having his own life. But not because he is a dwarf or something lightweight. I know a specific example.

Funny as a question …. For me it is not inherently paradoxical, but it depends what is meant by eugenics. It seemed that eugenics was the desire to create the best possible beings. But when I talk about creating the best things I mean manipulating the embryo from the 1st stages of development into a perfect being has his taste. This is in no way opposed to abortion. For we may well wish to manipulate the embryo offspring as the desire, without resorting to abortion if this operation should fail, right?

But I do not because even if humans for abortion is nothing before God and the people concerned will have to answer for murder. The world is completely ASSHOLE. I would like to respond a little to all these messages because I can not answer each individually, however I will like! Do not confuse everything there are millions of abortions each year worldwide for a yes or a no girls that have abortions! regarding orphan diseases by severity I think it's a matter of conscience (but a tiny percentage of all those abortions). Yes as long as the egg is fertilized it becomes a life on its own, for evidence in the Bible under the Mosaic law a person who "bumped" a pregnant woman and the baby if she lost the person who had bumped die was because it was a life for a life. It is God who made these laws which proves that even an embryo in any hour is a living thing in itself. Genetic code are already registered,. Genetic code are already registered, the color of her eyes, her hair, which he resembled his father or his mother, etc. …

You are against abortion is but what do you think of contraception? And sex education? Because for me the best weapon to bring down the number of abortions is better access to contraception and sex education for girls and boys. What do you think?

An embryo is not a baby, simply. And your god should answer for the murder of all children born dead, all miscarriages and babies u lost to accidents as we are! I also assign to the course for the Tsunami in Southeast Asia: 300,000 dead and for the storm in New Orleans! He better have a fucking god your lawyer! @ Dding: ha! That's it! I'm pissed! if so … So for you, the ultimate proof that biblical interpretation!? Ah bravo level of thinking. If you accidentally pushes a woman and she loses her baby must be killed! That is just divine justice for you right? Well let me tell you that your justice craind a max and I am very glad that our society does not enforce it. Your bible also justified slavery I remind you, do I conclude that you disapprove strongly the abolition of slavery? I would love to see you defend this abmination quoting the Bible, it would make me laugh! An embryo is not a living being,. Your bible also justified slavery I remind you, do I conclude that you disapprove strongly the abolition of slavery? I would love to see you defend this abmination quoting the Bible, it would make me laugh! An embryo is not a living being is just a cluster of cells. A living being has a minimum of autonomy, the embryo: 0. As mentioned in religious texts for "evidence", I recall that the Egis authorized the killing of up to 4 months pregnant, because she regarded the baby as not living up to four months. So, reversals jackets when it suits you …

A fetus is not a baby. No more than a sperm … When you dump the puree, 40 million sperm on average, what is it then, genocide?

If you had worked in psychiatry and as I saw this live as babies from birth you would have perhaps a different perception. All those who make an abortion is a déchirrement for them, do not forget that in time the women brushed against death for abortion but is it better to keep a child who does not and who will be unhappy all his life? What is regrettable is that in China where they can have only one child and India, where dowry is compulsory for a girl to marry is about making abortions as well as infanticide of girls.

this terrible case of conscience must no longer be present on the table. science has put at the service of humanity. each person who is sexually active must take its responsibility and protect women and men. préservatifs.vasectomie, pills, ect many choices. for unconscious? 's tans the worse for them.

a question. if you learn one day that your future child's disease harlequin http://www.google.com/images?hl=fr&safe=off&q=harlequin% 20ictiosis & um = 1 & ie = UTF-8 & source = & sa = N og & tab = wi & biw = 1280 & bih = 805 or any shit like this is horrible. what will you do? thou shalt have the courage or the nerve I know not to give birth to a sensitive human being with a functioning nervous system allows him to feel pain, knowing full well that all his life (he died pTet immediately , maybe in 10 or 40 years) will only PURE PAIN every gesture he will do. whenever it will even bend the arm, his skin will tear. it will likely end up like him http://images.encyclopediadramatica.com/images/b/bd/Partyman.jpg because that's what you have as a child. a living being who suffers Constantly. knowing that if the early months of pregnancy you have the hypocrisy to tell me that you will ensure that it is happy until his death, forgive me insult you but you're really a big. knowing that if the early months of pregnancy you have the hypocrisy to tell me that you will ensure that it is happy until his death, forgive me insult you but you're really a grosconnard. it comes from the heart, forgiveness. because it will never change the fact that he will suffer permanent and it will grow so very weird. and I sincerely hope that these images shocked thee! because it gets worse as orphan disease detectable from pregnancy. Today in 2011 the technology allows us to ensure that people can be born happy or die happy. unfortunately perverse religious concepts like the soul ect, not only hamper scientific progress, but also did nothing to fuck man (who is the first question I think)! it's so easy to invoke God to justify the suffering of others! kind with euthanasia. when you have a patient who wishes to have shortened his suffering, the doctor agrees, but you always relatives, religion crap with any erroneous concepts of Good and Evil and without empathy (the ability to put themselves in the shoes of someone else and ask if we would like that), who say no because only

http://www.mariereine.com/affiche.php3?ID=590&categorie=6

If they were men who had had birth, abortion was never a crime. I agree it is an evil, but a lesser evil!

There are actually tens of millions of abortions worldwide each year. This practice homicide is considered "normal" for the simple reason that there is a general hardening of human consciousness: "However, the inspired word clearly says that in times to come some will abandon the faith, paying attention to misleading inspired utterances and teachings of demons, 2 by the hypocrisy of men who tell lies, as being branded in their consciousness "(Timothy 4:1,2. Bible).

Hello! Life begins at fertilization. thus aborted a child is a life interrupted. Humans are not allowed to interrupt an innocent life. Deliberately cause an abortion by artificial means, by the use of drugs or a medical operation for the sole purpose of avoiding unwanted childbirth is a painful act for the woman both mentally and physically. It is even more violent for children as it does not survive. Life is a precious gift, it is sacred. A 2004 study among 331 Russians and 217 American women who had abortions found that in each half of the women subsequently experienced an unpleasant feeling, almost 50% of Russians and 80% of Americans felt 'guilty', and over 60% of Americans' do not forgive. " They are frequently subjected to pressure. Parents, spouse or well-meaning friends saying, "Of two evils one must choose the lesser" argument. Parents, spouse or well-meaning friends saying, "Of two evils one must choose the lesser" argument quipeut lead to a hasty decision and poorly lit. "But," says Priscilla Coleman, a specialist risk of abortion for mental health, once the stress of decision making and the abortion took place, the cognitive abilities of women returning to normal and deep guilt, sadness and regret settled. "Regret is usually around the question of abortion he put an end to what was already a life? According to the report of a study group on abortion (South Dakota), many women considering abortion "were misled: they believed that not take away anything other than cluster of cells'. If they had been told the truth, they would not abort. "After a summary of the" surprising and heartbreaking testimony "from 1940 women who had abortions, the study concluded:" The grief of losing a child, they were told, did not exist for many causes of anger . ". "Moreover," the psychological harm caused to a woman who knows she killed her child is often devastating. " A 2006 study focused on the lives of many women, adolescent girls were pregnant. Half of them had kept the child and the other half had failed. The study found that "the odds of receiving therapy, have problems sleeping and smoking marijuana were lower in cases of childbirth than in abortion cases." – Journal of Youth and Adolescence. Another report provided "the results of four studies of the most advanced worldwide. What we learned? That "the rate of psychological problems are higher among women who had abortions than among those who kept their child. "- Report of the Task Force on Abortion, South Dakota, 2005 In the end, everyone is free, but there are consequences in every decision: caring for a child when we are. "- Report of the Task Force on Abortion, South Dakota, 2005 In the end, everyone is free, but there are consequences in every decision: caring for a child when we estadolescent, or kill her child. The best thing is to have physical relationships when one is married couple, able to accommodate a child. Because we must not forget that the relations of this type are basically an expression of love that two people are doing, but also and above all a means to procreate. The solution is to teach young people that intimate relationships are sacred and they should not be taken lightly because they can give life to a person whom will be responsible. Good day!

The choice of abortion is primarily the woman and not a God who probably does not exist.

there was slaughter in the South and North Kivu, Congo Roayume. Several deaths on Sudan "Somalia" War in Congo Brazzaville, More deaths in the Republic of Côte d'Ivoire, several deaths in Angola almost everywhere in Africa rien.Plusieurs coup. It is the union boss who Euroépenne Africa, and did not intervene. Understand that we are called to repentance and conversion to head narmale of life that is happy and eternal in Jesus Christ, the Prince of Life. Do not judge, said, Jesus of Nazareth. We want to create new rules of good political governance, economic and financial planet because justice is a people growing up, but the sin is the shame of a nation. When life goes from bad to worse, we must have recourse to Jesus of Nazareth "God from true God who created us. Marriage does not like to be faillite.il secuiriser social life of the people, police and military basis of each country's national economonie the planet.

not me because I was looking for a baby for 20 years

looks like this instead: it happened a month ago and already 22 million hits! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXh7JR9oKVE&feature=player_embedded #! Happy Holidays

I will respond the same way I did it to another question on abortion. For those who do not want to admit the horror of abortion, to learn more: There are a lot of sites on the Internet where you can see the sad truth. Where you can see ultrasound pictures of fetus week by week, and also photos / videos of actual abortions that are unbearable for me. So do not forget the obvious! A fetus at 12 weeks it already looks like a tiny human being, and in some countries abortion is allowed up to 24 weeks or more! The fetus is a living and he suffers. Especially when we know the ways of all abortions that are really horrible. Some babies (especially those in some cases removed by caesarean section) did not die during the abortion, but after this one, yes it sometimes happens that they are still alive and dying after abortion. It's HORRIBLE. Some people should be more responsible. Some people should be more responsablequand the pill and forget … For children who will be born ill-formed, it is true that it's delicate dilemma understandable, or to children born of rape may be understand that it is psychologically hard for a woman to live. You can see things from different angles, but for my part, I am against abortion. Especially since most are of a forgotten pill, or other irresponsible.

the world has no morals!

I personally am not against abortion but it is a bit trivialized and show the truth to the students is a step towards allowing a lucid awareness and knowledge about the thing. Abortion is killing a living being, do not take it lightly!

Because he did not want to indoctrinate students with his own ideas.

videos shown to students must be shocking! and hurt the sensibilities of some students! despite that these videos will reveal a strict truth he did not intend to disclose it without authorization from his superiors! hello everyone!

You seem bothered you. Well, if you have a little bun in the cupboard, takes. Maybe later you can no longer. In 1990, a young lady had already opened this topic with me, and I say "Take." The result of my board is a pretty girl who is now married. P. .. Time passes quickly.

Yes, euthanasia is also

Yes! Sm

A few weeks ago my best friend has been violated after the delay has made it a pregnancy test (positive). Her gyneco confirmed the pregnancy but refuses to abort a result of his convictions. Sybil does not want the baby she already has a little girl of 2 years.

Abortion is legal! no doctor can oppose it, especially a gynecologist!

Bin your girlfriend has to go to another gynecologist to do her ivg …. appropriate, it can be made by medical or surgical … only a gynecologist may perform an abortion ….

if she was raped and she complained, she may request free abortion

You live in what country? Because it astonished that in France requires a raped woman to keep her baby …

France, a doctor may well oppose him what is called a "conscience clause", ie refuse to perform abortions for personal reasons, but it is required to provide contact information for colleagues so that your friend can continue the simplest approach is to consult with family planning and could also be assisted by associations of victims

doctors can refuse to perform abortions, but there are other doctors who are not cons. your friend can visit Planned Parenthood nearest his place of residence. it has all the useful addresses for an abortion.

Hear my great, I understand that your friend is depressed because she has right now is very hard, she can not take at face value on the net that offers him a shot, he has his health because on the net can tell him all kinds of Cogners has taken. It is best that you advise him to see another doctor seriously capable of providing the solution to his problem and also who will direct it to a colleague to help manage and overcome what is sometimes more

non-believers are the first to say that we are in a free country, in a democracy, it must be tolerant but when someone thinks differently, it is backward con see. That's your freedom? your democracy? if you feel the right to have your opinions, your ideas, you have to accept that others think differently, you think always right, and others have always wrong, everything you accuse the believers you made yourself you're not actually better than us. Abortion is a crime for me, yes a crime in some countries you can abort up to five months of pregnancy is no longer an embryo but a fetus, a child, what is it disturbing? Ah yes, it shows you face the truth, truth that you are not assuming, yes abortion is horrible and many women never recover. Yes I am disgusted when I see young girls and even women who cry after being reckless with a man and do not assume. Yes I am disgusted when I see young girls and even women who cry after being reckless with a man and who do not lesconséquences! Bouuuuh I am a naughty little extreme you say, but I totally do not care This is not a stranger to the internet that can tell me who I am and I know of no faith who are against abortion and they have kept their child. SAMIRA @ habib there are other alternatives to this kind situation, even if the child is conceived out of marriage we have no right to decide whether a human being is entitled to live or not @ kiela you are the perfect example of stupidity. first I do not live in a city (old prejudice two balls) what is the second report with bar p ***? you can insult the Maghreb all you want, I'm Comoros. reconstructions related to the hymen? you better turn your finger seven times before writing this bunch of nonsense, you're all alone discredits my poor @ ted Give me an argument for abortion, abortion is killing a child realizes you leave? not compare it to racism, then think of what you want

This depends on the situation … If this child was conceived by an inappropriate relationship, it would be better to do the abortion if you can! He should think about his future and what we can guarantee him afterwards, but most do not undertake to repair a fault with another. In another case, which is supposed to be between married, I'm against it. And to you see.

I am not a believer, and I am not against abortion, I do not think it is a crime and we simply points of view, and it does neither you nor me of extremists. There is nothing wrong with that, and those who are in the wrong are rather those who criticize our views, which are indisputable.

There is no harm in being against abortion because it is a crime. Http://fr.answers.yahoo.com/question/index; _ylt = Ak0JVR3koInRqOiTldTW2Zg5Agx.; _ylv = 3? Qid = @ 20100411082001AAT87pW Inches down, how do you call it: http://www.abortionno.org/Resources/pictures.html

You're not well: my poor and compassion you do not know. Because Muslims do not belong here in the clinic? And there in the corn is far worse. I do not wish you an abortion (I do not know either) but if a guy who knows your city does not take you in the cellar for a rotary – what will you do? And what do you think: Forced marriages of young girls with old perverts cousins? From the overwhelming number of girls in your religion that are in France again hymen? The Maghreb bar whores? "Let her who has never cast the first with errors stone "I do not regard you as a woman and it is not unknown for small miserable and poorly screwed internet that can tell me what is wrong. OKSANA

Democracy and freedom is not to have convictions intolérentes, middle ages and inconsistent. If you thought that, well you're wrong. If tomorrow I say "down all the blacks" or "cancer is good, it will be neither democracy nor freedom, but the stupidity. Humpty @ = Encourage people to guard against future disabled children, finding that a girl of 16 years is spoiling the life of a child under the excuse of "it must assume", claim that the embryo is a human whereas the facts show otherwise, expect rape give children …… all that is NOT based on "respect for human life" and "the equal dignity of all" . Humpty @ = "you have to tell young people" you're not ready / willing to do a kid? Do what it takes to avoid! " >>> Um, yes, we all agree with you, but once that is done? I do not know if you noticed, but we are talking about AFTER the design … not before. It would be good. It would be good quetu followed a bit … "What facts? ">> Well the fact that before the fetal stage, the embryo is not a natural person as the main organs did not appear. This fact. The same fact is accepted by the law and ethics, the same one that protects people like you … "In my case I found that the obvious objective fact the difference is the meeting egg / sperm ">> The problem is that" what concerns you "does not concern us, and do not look at these women who suffer. The embryo is not a separate being. Whether or not you think it will be the same thing, sorry. If I amused myself by saying "in my case, the earth is flat", I'm not sure it would make it really flat. Well there is none. "I hardly consider the fact to find that the life of a disabled child it is better to nip it in the" egg ">> Unfortunately, this proves that you are not very aware of the suffering disabilities engender. If your daughter had a child at 14, qu'elledevrait stop studying and go to work at the factory to bring it to life with a monthly minimum wages, certainly you rethought your capricious judgments. And to answer your reflection on the fact "kill a child," I reply before 3 months of pregnancy, it is not a child, not even a fetus, but an embryo. In no case is a murder, because the embryo is a quasi single cell, ie without consciousness or emotions. Before proclaiming this kind of "pseudo beliefs," we try to learn. It's quite a funny coincidence that those who are anti abortion are always those who know nothing … Finally, I quote: "You have the right to not like black people as you do not disturb keep the peace, so that's democracy. " Not my great, the fact of not liking black people is to judge a community and is punishable by law. It is by no democracy. Because that premium, you do not know thee + in democracy??? I do not you throw the stone, it. Because that premium, you do not know thee + in a democracy??? I do not you throw the stone, making c'esttoujours speak who know the + -… Samira @ = " doctors are against abortion. And then? If tomorrow is a president for the war? If a football star is conducive to racism? If a lawyer is for the death penalty? We should stop confusing "power" and "morality." Doctors are for abortion? Well I'm not surprised: there are people who lack ethics, and there are obscurantist everywhere … even among doctors. "I am opposed to women who do not have the stupid things they have done, it's easy to cry after! ". >> Samira, here it is not a playground. The arrival of a child in poor conditions, it is a little more serious than "must not come crying" or "they have to assume". Everyone makes mistakes, and everybody 's has no chance of being saved from hardship. When a child can avoid potential life miserable, and although we do. And it has far more important than "give a good. And it has far more importance than "give to women who come bonneleçon cry." Unfortunately for you, I know what I say. An embryo is not considered a human life and abortion is not murder, but the impediment of a vital development. It's like that, and it's not me who invented it. Let me guess: in this course, you were at the bottom of the class near the radiator, right? You can stay on your positions contemptuous and naive, but years ago that the world has changed allowing women and children of avoid lives of suffering. You do not accept it? Well it must. Samira @ = I reassure you, you do not work at all for the wicked, any more than for someone in pain experience and knowledge. "Embryo is not considered that human does not mean it is not ">> really? So we are still in the area of your "beliefs", which does not weigh heavily in the balance. "Majority of women who abort are idiots who have been careless with a man who cares a lot". The majority of women who abort are idiots who have been careless with a man who cares not mald'elles">> I'll repeat myself, but here it is not a playground. These women, you treat a silly (contemptuous that! Lol) do not deserve to suffer, and these potential children either. Lives have wasted much more important than your preconceptions about a "silly women" "imprudent" to whom we must "teach a lesson" You're talking about something more serious than your "they are idiots," they just cry "or" their guy does not care. "Samira @ =" t agree ''re too smart you know everything better than everybody you're happy? "Pardon? What is this story? You may think that is important in an exchange of "know everything better than everyone" or to have the last word? You're still here? "I thought that it was serious … So this is it? You lose face? Too bad … Know that I still do not pretend to know better than others. I only remind you that your ideas are in contradiction. I only remind you that your ideas are contradictionavec science and with ethics. Besides, the majority of responses to your question in this direction. Sincerely, Alongado @ = I read your comment, and I wondering what could push a People wanting to impose suffering on women and broken ruin the lives of hundreds of potential children. I found suspect your position, because when you love life, we do not like the wasted lives. And then I continued to read you … and I found dozens of lines of religious proselytism. I understand better.

Let me be very clear: I am pro-abortion's societal and anti-abortion in the personal domain, 1. My wife and I never practiced abortion, we are in this sense against abortion. Abortion is a crime for you, nobody can or has the right to impose on you the opposite … You will never be overwhelmed by abortion, it's your choice! 2. But from a legislative standpoint, I am strongly pro-abortion. Those who want abortion should be able to do so in conditions of hygiene and safety necessary. A paradox? No I am pro-choice, I am for freedom. Especially in this area where the crime is a subjective concept, the question is whether the embryo is a human being or not? I think not, but this does not prevent the embryo already love this … I like my cat who is not a human being …

We, the Judeo Christian tradition from the life begins at conception. They, among other Chinese, from Confucian life begin at birth. Who is right?

is your right and the other with these cities, but really what prejudices! rotating cities, hymen reconstruction: how old you really to make such amalgams inept!

In a simple context, abortion is a crime. But, you see, there are cases that should concern us such as: – Being pregnant after being raped! Keep this embryo, all your life, you go up the stage to the head. What about the child born, son of the rapist ….? Being pregnant and now the doctor finds that the seed that you wear will be an enormous health scandal and he would not survive after ten years. If an early pregnancy, you should stop to avoid the worst of the suffering of the child born before die .. ….. ……. etc. The examples are numerous and difficult. I understand those who are against this but we must also try to understand those who are for …. This is bad, are those who volunteer or those without medical or social …. These are the behaviors of those who offend because they bypass the property based and abuse at will, alas!

There are laws of creation (Acts of God) must always be respected. When humans can be contravened the laws of Nature, it will sooner or later experience the consequences of his actions (reciprocity effect)

Hello, everyone is entitled to his opinions. This will assume that the embryo is a piece of flesh, soulless, unconscious, and there is no harm in eliminating it. Maybe some they will consider it as a mistake, bad memories of a relationship arises? Maybe some people will kill convinced that the future will be bleak for him because they did not believe the comfort they need to grow? OF others, they may see as a hindrance to their studies or their freedoms? Or a family who does not wish to instruct a young child whose mother will not have the maturity or the money to good all? Personally, I am persuaded to say that the viability of the fetus plays an important role in our perception of "living". Thus, one can see women trying to go for abortion even in five months, but when one sees very premature to five months to live, with some effects, but also other normal development, I guess it may change our. Share opinions is good, but to declare a façonagressive is like imposing. Impose, in one way or another, is wrong. Thus, we have to see young girls broken by what they imposed on abortion. Not only for the good of the child who was to come, but for them, that they were immature, but also who should enjoy their youth! Personally, I've seen young girls proper care child, and I will add a first child at 16 or 30 years, is still unknown and doubt. In the end, I think I n'avorterai step, but this is my business and I have nothing to say to those who are for abortion, that is their choice, based on reflections of their own arguments. PS: You once told me that I was an unplanned pregnancy by mistake .. just that even if I am like everyone else, I can not imagine that one day well be alive, I was just a cluster of cells known.

Subject Salam very delicate and oh so complex, opinions differ, but do not think according to his own opinion to the dramas unfolding around the world .. The girl of ten years, a victim of incest, she should keep it if she is pregnant? And even at 14 or 13 or 15? Already the trauma, be still a child yourself and raise a child? No, need to think about that too, and then the other? Think about the weakness of human beings and that none is immune to a mistake, should keep them all? As if there were not enough small children living in large rejected home … And women who are tired, who have much and who can no longer follow? (In countries where they have not much to say .. Is the child to suffer the mistakes of these people …? Abortion is done from time immemorial, this is not a matter of acceptance of from others, but a social phenomenon as old as the world began, and which has already caused quite a premature death because. Estl'erreur Where? She should keep it? At the risk of his health and the rest? Is a right that should remain personal to the person concerned, the opinions of others does not involve the inside, as they say "the counselors are not paying"

If you are cons in your case, it is your business. By cons, if you are cons with regard to other women is that you want to decide what they are right or not do with their bodies in their place! And that decide for the others, is the basic principle of fascism! This is a woman's body in a free country, that's her, her and nobody else!

Hello Samira, J'agrée to your point of view. abortion is murder but will say that to those that it suits them and who are slaves to their passion. They are happy to be alive to cry "freedom" but they would be there if their mother had aborted? And when they have children they think for a moment that this child would he have been as abortion? Trivia: When even women, those advocates of abortion are pregnant and want the child to come, even for only one month of pregnancy must see their joy, they immediately run to ultrasound and take care of them for the baby to come. Is not it hypocritical for people who believe that the embryo is not a life? They care about their embryo already one month of pregnancy and encourage other to get rid of 3 months. A life is a life. She does not lose its value in becaufe not want! Must be responsible when having sex, the company wants accusatory towards these. She does not lose its value in becaufe not want! Must be responsible when having sex, the company wants to accusatory towards cesimmoralités there but the fact is that everyone knows what happens maintained when sex, Sex is not a game, you must be responsible and accept the consequences and recognize our hypocrisy and irresponsibility. There is no accident where everyone is aware of the risks . One drunken attack to justice by establishing their liability in accidents fatal road because they were well aware of the risks associated with driving while intoxicated. Similarly, when killing babies who have sex with awareness of the risks, it's all the same. Freedom for everyone, even for babies who can not see! "Nothing justifies murder, it is our society to find solutions to some sensitive cases. You will find that the crime attracts crime, it is time to consider breaking this vicious circle. Being against abortion does not preclude compassion for those who suffer in a devastating emotional state ….

One thing is to have an opinion, it is a sacred right, something else is to impose it on others. One thing is to have the right to choose, something else is having this forced choice. Have your own opinion does not mean that others must follow them.

I've always been against it but not imagine my galley now, with all the children I had with parishioners, and they also listen to my Preaching the idiots, and now I have lots of small children I ruined every Christmas, and it's not with the salary Benoit gives me that I'll get through. No abortion is wrong but would require a derogation from time to time.

In Islam, it is considered to be alive! Abortion is a crime that is exactly the same thing as killing a person 10 years or 50 years for us Muslims, there is no more serious than killing an innocent man! So whatever happens and any situation (relationship, viola, … etc.) is prohibited! it's just like killing a person! regardless of age (one month or 5 months)! @ Belle Zebute: what you say makes no sense! is a living being! he has the right to live right before her mother to the abortion or not! or because the person is to defend it becomes normal! he can not even defend the poor! is his choice to live before choosing her mother and I do not think a person who has not even begun this life will choose to die! is a crime and whoever did should be tried as a criminal

Yeah you got too Samira because I too am too agree with you it is too rebels both, you must too be the one you are you too and not even let you impress no strangers on the internet and if thee too want to say that Twilight is too good as you got the right too, it's not because you're a teenager you're necessarily totally immature.

I see no harm in being against abortion, in fact I am too. What I see is criticism: – Asserting that position by violence or even murder (some lighted in the United States U.S. in particular), weak and inconsistent position with the assertion of being pro-life. Fortunately they are a small minority factions, but they exist, so it must be pointed out, the more they discredit the cause they claim to defend very good. – In contrast to prohibit speech that those who believe it is a crime (and most atrocious, the victim is totally helpless) on behalf of freedom, which is equally incoherent. I co-sign all of the post repented. There are (even if they have to develop) alternatives. But we must help and support, not judge and condemn those who have done so under generally difficult. Denying the long-term psychological impact of abortion is dangerous for women (and their families) to deny the humanity of an embryo is. Denying the long-term psychological impact of abortion is dangerous for women (and their families); deny the humanity of an embryo esttrès arbitrary (and carries risks of landslide hazard on the fact of deciding who can live or not …) @ Ted, the position of most opponents of abortion is very consistent, whatever you say, since it is based on respect for human life and the equal dignity of all ( that which you defend rightly Hinder racism, but neglecting a way that I just found incoherent with those unborn). @ Ted since you still answer me (thank you): "@ Encouraging people to guard against future disabled children, finding that a girl of 16 years is spoiling the life of a child under the excuse of "it must take" -> The first thing is that there must be 16 years educated to be responsible in the sense not so much that "we must assume its mistakes (made you a kid? You are going to shit is good for you!") but rather, "you're not ready / willing to to a kid? Do what it takes to avoid! "As for disability, it should be more help. I express the wish just qu'onpuisse do otherwise. "All that is NOT based on" respect for human life "and" the equal dignity of all. "Question of definition. Personally, I find it difficult to consider the killing of a baby as respect for human life, and I'm struggling to treat the failure to find that the life of a disabled child it is better to nip it in the "eggs (quite literally) as a sign of the equal dignity of all. You can understand?" It may be difficult thee to accept, but he'll have to get used to them … "Why should I "make me" Yes, I know how society I live, I can do, thank you (and even without nightmares every night). That does not make me love in every aspect . Not to give up to move in a direction that seems best. As anyone or almost, I suppose. "Ted always @ (thank you for having responded yet, having said that I think it will stop there because we will transform the matter under discussion between us which is. Ted always @ (thank you for having responded yet, having said that I think it will stop there because we will turn the matter under discussion between us what n'estpas object): Some points: "If I amused myself by saying "in my case, the earth is flat", I'm not sure it would make it really flat. Well there is none. " No this is not the same. In one case we speak of the earth, objectively measurable physical concept with measures on which it is fairly easy to agree. In the other, we talk about the person, a legal concept (the subject of law) and philosophical, and hence the definition is much, much more debatable. Our philosophical choices lead us to have clearly incompatible designs. And the position of French law is not nearly as simple and "in your sense" that you seem to say. Do not think I am oblivious to the suffering he may have with a disabled child (just for closer, I had an uncle with Down syndrome). I also saw the joy and love that it could carry. I'm not saying this is easy, only that I do not see why they usurp the right to say if it. I'm not saying this is easy, only that I do not see why they usurp the right to say whether or not the blow çavaut as one would buy a thing. Because I think it is a human person as they speak, and that any drift eugenics is intrinsically dangerous. You say that "if the bodies are not finished this is not a person": it seems completely arbitrary and not founded more than say for example "before puberty (not the ability to reproduce, no maturity all organs again!) is not a person. " You doubt that I am not of that opinion. One last note. In terms of law, the 1975 Act is not a _légalisation_ but _dépénalisation_. A shade that has any importance.

I support you in your choice to be against abortion, however, I confess to being troubled in some cases. Such as rape, incest. Not that I find much of the abortion in these cases because it is an innocent who pay. I would simply say that it is God alone to judge these people and not us. Some people are weaker than others or less conscious or surroundings are less enlightened than thou because they can take a decision which does not weigh any weight. Personally I think there are so many couples who seek to have children, rather than an abortion would be best simply to give them the child, it would at least happy.

Hello Samira I'll tell you a story, that one of my former neighbors … She is married, both slowly approaching their thirties, they decide to have a child … she got pregnant, so good They are super happy …. ultrasound, and all the "armada tests during pregnancy etc. … hopefully … She gave birth to a baby boy born before a serious problem … (no trisomy but basically any thing that went awry during cell division … from what they told us, without going into too much detail), undetectable … that child survival estimated at 5 and 10 years … He is unable to care for himself, alongside cleanliness etc … Do not you think if they had known this would have been better for both you … she aborts imagine what raising a child they knew would not live beyond a maximum period of 10 years? During these 10 years, that child will experience a multitude of health problems, you honestly believe that it's fun for him. She is not, for example, which will impose on you the number of children you aurasdans your life right? there is such …

You have every right to be against abortion and say it without blushing. I would go further, it is intolerable that you are considering an abortion against your will, and if we try this, I will support you in your right to keep the child if you wish. But do not worry, in our country, nobody will force you to abort, then fine, breathe …:-)

@ Ted: I attend to the debate exciting, Firstly Sabrina has the right to be against abortion as you are for you. Personally I think it's inhuman, I honestly could not even watch kris's picture. Tell me Ted, you love life? you are happy to teach you, you cultivate and enjoy this life? I say this with all the respect I owe you, but imagine that your mom will have you deprived of that pleasure? Imagine that it's your we would have an abortion? You would probably not of this world in order to discuss with her on this issue. Abortion is a private life being, the embryo is a "potential benefit", although during the early phase of development are there does not yet have a soul, and it is not considered human [It depends for whom, because a lot of people more educated than you, do not share your ideas, but I'm not to say that are wrong and who is right, because everyone has it own vision] Being human potential because it is. May we are in the field of surgery and medicine, I tell thee a citerquelques Abu Al-Qacim (10th century): One of the greatest surgeons of all time. His treatises on surgery included clinical description of instruments he had invented (ophthalmology, gynecology), practice of cauterization. Translated into Europe in the 15th century. Ali Ibn Al-Abbas: While Hippocrates and his followers claim that the child emerges spontaneously from the womb of his mother, he discovers that the contraction of the uterus expels the fetus. He wrote treatises on abscess of the uterus and cervix of the uterus. He gave the world a medical book ever. There was Abu al-Qasim al-Zahravi (Albucasis) [father of modern surgery] Ibn Sina (Avicenna), Ibn Zuhr (Ibn Zuhr), Ali Ibn Rabban Al-Tabari Al-Razi (Rhazes) ………….. The list is long.

I always wondered if a pregnant person who expects triplets and that one child may want to derail the other two.

I do not think it possible and I am wondering that pregnant women could think like that already has such a thing and how can t be decided to stop life has this or another rather than a baby, I this question is a bit like bizard.

O_O

It is possible to do, it's called an embryo reduction (it happens for example during IVF if 3 or 4 embryos were implanted and all continue their evolution), but in general it leaves two embryos, pregnancies with twins a relatively low risk (compared to triplets, quads, etc.).

Good question. Should go and ask the question to Google cons:)

If they put the life of the mother in danger.

the choice is difficult to sacrifice two —- the carrier is in principle a mom!

Here I am already a father of 7 children and my wife, I love, is pregnant with eighth after a forgetting Pill recovered the next morning. We promised to stop there, but it has already experienced an abortion in inhumane conditions, so she wants to keep the baby but not me. I would like you to give me arguments for the pros and cons.

It's like Zola …

@ Greg's right … For my answer: yes, if it is on time, otherwise, abortion … 8 children !!!!! My God!

Given the experience of your wife I think she will keep this child because of fear of abortion. It will take place over a home that surely tight. But I think you will not love unless your wife and this child to come. The best will be after or even during this big she is considering another method of contraception than the pill. Unfortunately nobody can give you an opinion well enough to decide that you accept the situation especially after the eighth child. If it was still the 2nd or 3rd I think you would have had plenty of positive or negative arguments but had a position just a little more than what you currently live. 7 children is already a very nice family, but how to ask your wife to have an abortion in fear.

First of all congratulations for your 7 kids! … The arguments that I offer: FOR keep: – how an abortion is often very hard to do. It takes a strong morally and physically (an abortion was scheduled for my first, and the D-Day, I have not gone and I absolutely do not regret it) – if it falls through, we would always ask how our child. – if she had an abortion that did not go well, why the devil retried? – your wife wants to keep – a child is a + wonderful gifts that you can give us. COUNTER to keep it – if you have financial problems – why not find another hospital to do abortions? – if you're afraid of not giving as much love for everyone. – if the unborn child is not loved and labeled as "not wanted" and left behind I can not find other arguments that come. You understand that I would agree to keep, especially if your wife wants to keep it and it feels. You understand that I would agree to keep, especially if your wife wants to keep it and she sentcapable exiting in the difficult times are the beginning. I wish you courage. And a good pregnancy your wife if she were to keep it.

Personally, I have thirty kids, but not with the same mothers (about thirty as well) and not in the same country (twenty), the abortion pill, why not!