my daughter was 2 months, I breastfeeding but she lost the weight I have to give extra milk powder at each feeding, but she refuses the bottle, she can not drink, I tried give him a pacifier so that she understands the system but even that it does not. Have you had the same worries? Have you managed to get him to accept?

It is used to suck and she likes it, she didn't want to change to a milk does not know what she is not accustomed to the taste, and she too loves to be with her Mamma:) me when my daughter does not eat, I eat with her mouth jouvre pointing, smiling and expressing that I eat good c. After a moment she dun did the same thing … I show him lexemple basically it works not necessarily the first time but it has borne fruit in the end. Tests at different times of the day and avoid the evening before bed (often children love their parents sendormir)

temperature is probably too hot, try to put it down!

I had the same problem with my daughter, I was breastfeeding and when I give him a bottle of milk but at first she struggled, too, is a habit …. do not worry about it it will be very fast in all cases was the case for me ……… she grumbles at the beginning but she will soon

My tip: enclose the teat tissue (handkerchief for example). The baby will feel more in touch with the rubber and voila …

"At 17, when she was seven months pregnant and a half, my biological mother decided to have an abortion by saline injection," said the girl. "The aborted child is me. I should die. But I survived. "Do you think God approves of abortion?

Life and death is not ours it belongs to the Lord, To your question: Embryo, the third week, the embryo is four or five Inches The vertebral column is the first to be fashioned, the blank forms of heart The heart beats and blood circulation, your mother is a criminal and should pay for his attempted murder, as a 7 and a half months is no longer a feotus is a complete baby and ready to be born you had very lucky, God was with you that day,

ASIDE GOD AND THIS ABSOLUTELY Lavort all monotheistic religions will tell you the same thing!

At design!

The Judeo Christian will tell you that life begins at conception. However, the other half of the planet will tell you that life begins at birth (Confucius). That's what makes among other things that medical advances on stem cells, are much more advanced in China and Asia than the West.

very clever one who will tell!

Hi Phyl! In the eyes of God, from our conception in the womb of our mother with the union of an ovum and a sperm, your life begins! Besides, the psalmist wrote in Psalms 139: 16: "Your eyes saw my embryo, and in thy book were written all its parts, which are days when they were formed and where there was not yet one of them. "So God for that human life begins even before birth a baby! For him, life is sacred and of course it surely do not condone abortion. Thank you for your excellent question and doors yourself, bizz

life begins when sperm meets an egg

This is an important issue that any person who should be asked and answer. The answer could be provided by the designer of life itself. And only the Bible gives an answer worthy of interest to people-friendly life. After nine months of pregnancy, a child is born, often living, and sometimes stillbirth. The life of the newborn begins she is already at birth or in the womb? At what time? We probably agree that a baby was actually a human being because once outside the uterus continues to live as such. There is even an embryo that was a few weeks. All parts of the embryo begins to develop at conception when the woman's egg is fertilized by a sperm of man. Technological advances have enabled scientists to observe the extraordinary changes taking place in the nucleus of this single cell fertilized egg. From the. Starting laconception, a new life begins. We can already consider the unborn child not a single cell cluster more in the womb, but as a full human being. This single cell starts the process of starting actual construction of a miraculous fully formed human. She understands the program well codified in DNA, and is programmed for all the opportunities for growth, development and adaptation, our morphological traits and etc.. The body of the mother already considers the embryo at this stage, as a foreign body, it would soon be dismissed without the "protected environment" that is created in the womb. This new human life, separated from the mother by a protective shell, is a person with a genetic fingerprint of its own. Rightly indeed that David wrote under divine inspiration, these words: Psaumes139 :13-16. "For thou hast produced my kidneys; you knit me together in my womb. "For thou hast produced my kidneys; you knit me together in the belly of Mamer. I will praise you for that, a fear-inspiring way I am wonderfully made. Your works are wonderful, and my soul knows it. My bones do thee not hidden when I was made in secret, when I was woven into the lower parts of the earth. YOUR EYES HAVE SEEN MY EMBRYO AND IN YOUR BOOK WERE LISTED ALL ITS PARTS, FOR WHAT IS THE DAY THEY WERE TRAINED AND WHERE THERE WAS NOT EVEN ONE OF THEM. "Human life begins at conception, upon meeting the mother's egg with the sperm of the father, a new life begins. The debates on the status of the embryo, Christians adhere to the view of the Bible that gives the price of human life. PS36: 9. Jehovah already see the unborn child from its infancy. Jehovah sees a man has been designed from the moment of fertilization, not a man will be designed, I do not know outside the womb or something. Good weekend!

I live in an area where it is hot and the apartment we live in is south facing so sun all afternoon, you can not put the fan or air conditioning, too dangerous for baby! but I fear that my baby is dehydrated even though she has very little head nearly every 4 h, and I drink lots of water! but then I give in addition a small bottle of Evian or it is not necessary! @ Lady, I wish I could give her the breast more often, but my doll has a very good sleep, and it is not want to try to wake up (diaper, take a bath, tickling the feet;))! although I should not wake up! but it worries me too!

M W zidane materazzi

not useful in my personal experience. present him in more often. (Advice from my pediatrician)

The additional problem of water is that they will fill his stomach, it will suck milk so much milk as it will not hunger. But water is unhelpful to an infant and the risk is that it does not take enough weight, or lose it. Remember your baby does that when the liquid head . There is no reason for him becoming dehydrated if you proposed to him the breast as often as necessary. Moreover, if not thirsty, he does not drink, either water or milk.

Hello, After 7, including 3 babies breastfed in midsummer (born in July and August) I would say if he cries between the boobs put in. Water is the only drink useful to humans but very small so he may no longer want to breastfeed. And may also not want the bottle anyway! Short, it is not dangerous or serious to give him water but he better do it suck a little more. Finally, if there had to dehydration (I know you said "If anything is wrong and I did not see!" Mom I was an infant too ): The large fontanel (hole on top of his head) is cut; If you pinched (gently) the skin of his arm or his leg will remain what it is call'd a skin fold (the skin does not tighten immediately) Once the baby is dehydrated and in danger. If your baby is well, it is reactive as usual, he is not crying constantly or amorphous, is that everything is going well! Give him within just a little more than usual and did not see eye to the clock. If your baby is well, it is reactive as usual, he is not crying constantly or amorphous, is that everything is going well! Give him within just a few more than usual and did not see eye to the clock Here is the south of France, I have not yet dried, despite the 35/38 that we often then do you trust and do trust him because it screams very strong this stuff when it wants to drink!

I still breastfeed, but I already know that water is not good for baby because it takes the breast. They say that breast milk provides everything you need for baby food and drink. The bottom line is that the mother takes a lot of water, already it seems that breastfeed thirsty, so do not deprive yourself not, take plenty of fluids. Good luck.

it is not necessary you can put the cool mist with a washcloth wet … you can also put you in the pram and walk outside in the shade

you can screw up your breastfeeding. Put your baby more often within. You give him the application? All 4am is just so small.

Everything is in the question lol I know that I no longer nursing since the 3rd I have my son and my third child. They are very strong and that n is not very aesthetic.

Yes up to 6mths I think it's important to breastfeed. I think it's normal.

I will not say it this normal or not but my friend has stopped breastfeeding her daughter will have one more than 3months and she has continued to milk his doctor told him that she was incoscient'll have surment wanted continued to breastfeed but had to stop his work and blow it in the milk product tjs you should just be called a tone gygy, or when the doctor treating him would tell you why it is so visible tjs

Legalization of abortion? Voting? Feminist movement and struggle for loss of wage inequality? Maternity leave? Pill?

Abortion Pill and even if these rights diminish today unfortunately …

Simone Veil and her right to contraception and abortion I think.

I would rather say that the legalization of divorce in Italy is much less since the gas cylinder exploding and women eloctrocutées

Voting rights for women (1944 a historic feminist movement and struggle for loss of wage inequality (as) maternity leave (bof we should not piss off too) Pill (no question to me after you refile AIDS) Condoms (what a great invention)

LOREAL action?

Right to vote and leave (s) of Motherhood which add the comforts of modern life, including home appliances because the pill, abortion and the so-called "feminist empowerment" that will allow the progression of obscurantism !

The invention of Gregory Pincus

ke this is two days I did not have my period I take the test and that is I do not think positif.et pa have a child now I simply do 19ans.comment I'm afraid.

Because you think maybe you'll find advice here to get an abortion when nobody knows who you are?! It should perhaps be thinking that you consult a gynecologist soon.

Fortunately we are no longer in the 1960s, will instead see a doctor or family planning clinic. Frankly women of our age have fought for nothing so when we read this kind of nonsense but I suppose if you're joking this is serious.

I know that folds behind the law to say at what point a fetus becomes a human being, preventing any recourse to abortion. But life is not a game, and abortion is an act that requires to assume all responsibilities and consequences! Which law should be preferred, that of becoming mother or the unborn child?

Abortion is not murder because it removes what is not a child. If you push the logic of anti-abortion to the absurd, a cyst, a nodule, tumor have a conscience and must not be removed. You see? Another argument: a child born in a home that does not want and can not afford to raise them. Where are his rights there? Better to live in these conditions or not living (knowing that a fetus aborted never lived) and what is the position of anti-abortion on children with severe disabilities? Better to let them vegetate all their life on a bed of bedridden or prevent all this suffering for the child and his family?

you mean "women become" since becoming a mother it means nothing!

This is not new, but personally I think the answer is personal in any case within the limits of French law. And then it must be a beginning, French law says that at 11 weeks seems far-fetched as saying that 2 cells is a human being, while a small piece of skin that I scratched it represents more.

This question is not "controversial", it just completely sterile. Whether or not allowed, there have always been women who aborted and there always will be … not worth discussing here over the centuries. The fact that it is legal just allows better supervision and avoid women maimed or dead on the kitchen table. If you do not want women have abortions, it is necessary that men do not make their one child per year there are more rapists, more incest, more accidents and more condom forget pill, the more difficult living and poverty, many men who once barred their pregnant girlfriend and more children with disabilities … provided that it is impossible and it will not happen! And think that women who abort do not light heart and do not find it harmless. And the law being who exists and has already living on the avails of course, what might become a person but is still nothing more than a tiny cluster of cells without conscience.

The miscarriage is spontaneous abortion, we must condemn the woman who made a manslaughter?

not abortion is not a crime legalized! is the free choice of every woman to have her body (why should they suffer unwanted pregnancy and all that goes with it then you guys have the opportunity lache to escape?)

The issue is not controversial and much less sterile, it is still today a major topic of bioethics and neuroscience. The debate is not always confined within the elite, contrary to what is commonly admitted. And the crux of the debate is a battle between teams of different embryologists and neuroscientists, philosophers, etc., etc. to find out from to be considered when the embryo as nervously active. The debate is very deep, much, much more than what is presented in "public." And here, on a general site we can see everybody reapply with a brutal response, single and without appeal: everyone thinks hold with certainty Truth. That is to say you got those who say NO this is not a CRME legalized and say that the question is stupid, and who did you say yes of course and break the other . It makes me laugh when I see that even eminent thinkers doubt and fail to give a clear answer. Basically, it is not a. Basically, we do not know of unpoint scientifically whether or not one can speak of "murder." Only responses "literary" of metaphysics and religious responses, and other atheists. Science has not yet responded. So for the moment we do not know. So stop being fundamentalist in your mind (yes endpoint, whether the endpoint and no discussion, because it's like that).

That all depends on your beliefs regarding the beginning of life: either it begins at birth, or it begins at conception. No, life is not a game, and it is precisely because I I have great respect for life, woman and child than I am for abortion. I'll explain my reasons. First, I know what it feels like not to have been a child desired. Your mother does everything to take care of you, but deep down she knows, and you feel it does not want your presence. To wipe the guilt she will overprotects, but love is something voluntary, not imposed, and it can not deceive, it becomes oppressive, guilt, and do not meet the real needs Child (protection needs among others). I return to what I said love, including breast, is not necessary. A woman who is "forced" by his entourage, law or morality it is necessary to keep a child she does not will not be a good mother, will not be able. A woman who is "forced" by his entourage, law or morality it is necessary to keep a child she does not will not be a good mother, will not be mesurede really love, protect, and help her child. It is a great suffering for the child, so he asked all his life what he doing there (sometimes prefer to die) and mother who lives plagued by guilt and sacrifice their free choice. Sometimes the mother and child, it is better that the child was born. Then you have the right to say that we must strive to avoid reaching that point, and I am quite d Okay. There are several solutions which all have a common starting point: learn to communicate about sexuality with young people (even if young people are not only concerned with abortion, but good information is still top for life) . They learn by example to say "no" to express their expectations, their understanding of the issues that are behind the sexual act (not to ban them because their bodies belong to them, but especially that they bear the consequences), and mostly importantly, they allow free access to contraception. We can not prevent others. We can not prevent autresde do what they want from their lives, however we can inform them about the consequences of their actions. The Netherlands are among countries where abortion is the easiest to access and yet it is less practiced in France: there, we did a lot of campaigns on contraception, it also communicates.

c is an act of conscience for the life of a fetus is a life "to hunt or fish does not eat what is killing the failure to protect in the sexual act using his body against nature with the risk of diseases such as AIDS polemic on life is a potential risk for those who seek the controversies the question is still Satan said that the man with his character has the free will to follow his tracks and just look at the result of the god of this world satan loves phylosophy for he has even try phylosophy with God being far more of human perfection MORALITY REMOTE s also increasing and everyone's accounts will join a cause that is identical to the self same Jesus said to desire a woman in his heart c est deja l adultery if you were to remove a life as a fetus in how your conscience to know the consequences for you and the mother> nobody will judge you because you will judge you even into your thoughts as to whether you will No excuse or accuse never forgetsSatan resurrects that does not risen Lord GOD make your choice it nya no 3 rd solutions

It appears to me difficult to consider that just as there are genetic individuality there is "life" and "conscience". Otherwise, all that actually kills us (viruses, bacteria, cancer …) should be preserved as part of their unique DNA, they are endowed with "conscience" and "life." The life according to religion and morality is sometimes preserved at the cost of the absurd. How many people suffering from incurable disease, conscious of their condition and kept alive only by machines or medicines have asked to die? That they were denied for many, the name of "life". But it is reasonable to ask "what life?" How far must we go through suffering to preserve the "life." Spontaneous abortion also exists, yet no one accuses the nature of "play with life "discarding an embryo unviable. If abortion is an ancient practice. I think that today it is best managed and most respectful. I think that today it is best managed and most respectueuxdes rights of everyone (It also seems to me that this number is decreasing, contrary to what some say). We avoid seeing women left to die after an abortion wild. This could become quite marginal, while some instead to advocate abstention or ignorance, saw sex education in a normal reality. It is Anyway, out of the question back on the right. Especially for the sake of people who do not hesitate to show disrespect or to kill human life, they have worked so hard to "save".

Already when we talk about abortion in France in any case, we called an embryo, no fetus, except in the last 2 weeks of the statutory period. Embryo is a person? A fetus of 12 weeks is there a ? Murder by definition is to kill a person. So the question, an embryo or a fetus under 12 weeks are these people? And even, what are the unborn? Should we mourn d an embryo? At this rate there, that women who miscarry mourn 1 year and not bury their embryos? It must be logical, since the embryo is a person … It takes insurance funeral of the first day of delayed menstruation? When does this on one person? Legally, from birth, not before The baby is a person, the embryo and fetus younger than 12 weeks are not a certainty … It is ideological and even scientific. The fact is, there is not A return above the limit, abortion is allowed up to birth, it seems, "anyway, from 22. The fact is, there's no going back over the limit, abortion is allowed up to birth, it seems, "anyway, from 22semaines, structures of nerve pain are in place, it must have a good sense not? " I would agree, but is not when talking about one of unborn child? When there is a parental project. An embryo frozen in nitrogen could ultimately be considered a person potentielle.un embryo who moves into the uterus of a woman on the pill who does not want is not a potential person … Allow abortion before 12 weeks of pregnancy, is not to deny the potential person in an embryo or a fetus under 12 weeks, since there is no obligation to do so, and since in the context of a parental project, the same embryo and fetus even if he violates is defensible. It's just a possibility for a woman who has no parental project, that's all. And this is not an obligation, without parental project she may choose to keep the pregnancy anyway. And think well that women who use it have good awareness of issues and consequences. To the question,. To the question, does favors on the right to become the mother or the unborn child, the answer is both my master, but it is becoming mother or unborn child if and only if there are project Parental … And this is what is done legally, and it has nothing to do with abortion A pregnant woman who does not want child is not becoming a mother, it's just a woman pregnant an embryo that is not the result of a parental project is not an unborn child, just an embryo. But there, in your last question you consciously use the terms pro-life, and this is certainly not for nothing …

http://sarkofrance.blogspot.com/2010/01/avortement-le-futur-parcours-du.html

I forgot! free budget cuts, it's normal!

as what the budget is also logical ideo-logical! so this is rather popular in rural areas or who are underserved in health services: hospitals, home medical ..

It is quite true and inadmissible; many women all over France have had problems to qualify for an abortion in recent years, either through lack of facilities or because of the reluctance of some practitioners. We must that women are aware of the precariousness of this position and have no hesitation in going to the wall so that the law is fully implemented throughout the country.

Indeed, a law is really effective if its budget accompanies … Remain vigilant (e) s!

200 miles cut baby alive or burned alive sodium ,….. c is not enough ?…… Moloch was still hungry?

As much as I am for abortion, but should not it become a means of contraception as another ass yes but not at any price.