12 weeks then 3 months

3 months.

Legally 12 weeks, by cons, if for therapeutic reasons, the delay is longer.

Medical abortion (with drugs) not beyond the 7th week surgical abortion (AEC anesthesia): until the 12th week this does not IMG (abortion for health reasons of the mother / fetus) that can occur without reflect specific deadlines.

3 months or 12 weeks.

hello At 3 months

3months unless serious reasons than this.

DO NOT MAKE you'll blame you all your life.

SA in France it is 14 legally but many doctors refuse after 12 weeks many of you

@ Manel Christiano, you doing what else in life besides thinking about ass?

Thank you for the info

That's why it should not go against nature

Fortunately I have never practiced it. It disgusts me already … There, you put the package!

Are you Doctor? .. I do not believe everything you just tell. waste "poop" are already prepared and stored in the small intestine. these wastes can not leave because the anus is sealed. an anus is closed premeditated by man, because being away from home, the man manages to keep up the house .. into the toilet. So the man contracts and relaxes the muscle volontairement.c is only the digestive juice and digestion which convert food waste. no anus. also gives your stem .. thank you!

Outside the very last point on which you approach that I have some doubts to have known cases that match what you describe, I would tend to refute your argument (not necessarily what you assert, but the consequences or deductions that you draw). 1) Some micro-organisms that exist there. Yes, unreservedly. 2) They may also become pathogenic. Yes. However, some environments are especially equipped for defense. 3) After [...] surely do a small tour vagina. It can. Or not. Personally, whenever I happened to go from back to front, I always made a detour to the bathroom before. No question, in fact, mixing the two. I even tried (with some success) to educate those of my friends that I knew "practitioners." Yeah, it cuts a little note, but when it's clear to both, it poses no real problem. 4) micro-organisms can enter through the meatus should be noted that one can wear a condom. 4) micro-organisms can enter through the meatus should be noted that one can wear a condom (in many cases it is strongly recommended). Apart from this solution, nature is still rather well done. Have you noticed how often, after an orgasm, want to have to go pee? This reaction is not psychological (as opposed to what one of my friends has long believed), nor the only result that prostate snaps into position "standard". It is an internal cleaning mechanism, which aims to remove the seeds eventually introduced into the urethra. This is useful for everyone since it can also nab the nasty microbes in the vagina. On the question of the anal sphincters is like all practices: enough is enough. A little exercise is good for health. Many sports that require attention. Too little sports seriously damaging and even killing. Same thing here. Any damage that you describe do exist, but they correspond to extreme practices and remain very marginal in relation to the total number of sodomites. Those who have. Desproblèmes those who are most often people who do not take basic precautions, or who have not been sufficiently attentive to their bodies. In summary, your post is unnecessarily alarmist and, in this form, untrue. Basically, as it is written, it looks like "smoking kills" on cigarette packages: "sodomy will make you sterile and incontinent" (you forgot "and send you straight to hell"). NO. The reality, as often is much more nuanced. Sodomy is a practice that requires care and vigilance. And which, I grant you, those who do not want should not be forced. As in all areas of love. No? ================================ @ Anna: Why? Did you find anything in the "life", more important or more interesting than the ass? ================================ @ Christiano: the reference to your source confirms what I thought. Your uncle, by the nature of its activity, is typically in the syndrome of "the tree that hides the. Your uncle, by the nature of its activity, is typically in the syndrome of "the tree that hides laforêt" sodomites the few who have problems come to see the multitude that goes do not contact, outcome, he sees only the minority. QED.

A link, a book title, anything, but a source please! I remain skeptical!

Super!

ahem! ok, I'll think banning sodomy in my life then! horrib is' what you say!

Yes, but it's so good …

should not be clairvoyant to think about what will happen in the spincter destroying them but you have to be perverse to practice sodomy with a woman (I do not speak of homosexuals is their problem

yes, it's a biology course with highly structured examples thank you

Finally, something sensible and intelligent to say in this topic. It is always wise to give such information to a lot of people who know nothing about this practice and fellatio and cunnilingus.

My dear, it is also practiced between two men … Anyway, thank you for the comment very unsavory, I would not die silly.

After these explanations will reflect the followers of this practice, I have to tell you, "VIVE LA Jobs."

FN you vote?

finally someone who does not trivialize sodomy as too many have tended to do today and thank you for detailed explanations as well mealtime it is not the most appetizing …

He said the truth: it must be executed …

he is anti abortion, anti foo, anti trick I do not care that his right (although I do not endorse). But ……………… .. he did not bring his religious ideas in public schools, secular and even less to show kids movies shocks as was obviously the one he showed! Hence it oversteps its rights (and the more I knew that abortion was her specialty geological history?) and I understand that the kids were shocked! He is suspended and so much more!

Shameful. One teacher did not introduce his personal opinions in class. I'm horrified at the idea that a teenager, having seen the film in question, choose to complete an unwanted pregnancy, destroying all its hopes for the future

yes it is true that it's much better to butcher a fetus with the murderous law of Simone Veil in the anonymity that shows how our society no longer have any moral value and have formatted the people shirk when a woman becomes pregnant, the physical deletion is the ultimate solution

it is lamentable, unfortunate that there are no videos of women dying as a result of an illegal abortion! a teacher must be neutral and above all not to proselytize religion. Blue in the sky you can not force anyone to carry a child against her will That you're not shocked, on behalf of your respect for life, that women can die in horrible suffering, seems very hypocritical of you . Abortion has always existed and even if I think it should only be used as a last resort, it is imperative that it be executed in the best possible conditions.

This teacher is free to have their religious views or other However, it is intolerable that make propaganda of his views against abortion, which is forcing more students to watch a movie unbearable images, in addition to rule against any form of contraception, and remember that the condom is the only way to fight against STDs! It has seriously breached its duty of neutrality, it has been sanctioned perfect! @ Blue is the sky: The murderous law? This law is a sacred way when we see the deplorable conditions under which illegal abortions were performed before the Veil Law Act of 1975, and especially their disastrous consequences

He did not express his views to his students and especially traumatized by showing them this video, it deserves to be disbarred for life

This slippage is symptomatic of the excesses of some members of National Education. I put it on the same plane as the stance towards high school events. Recently I saw a news report, a teacher of the Orne département representative present himself as the NPA. Teachers should be subject to the same rules as the military in terms of affiliation to political parties, eligibility and reserve duty. Longtarin @: we agree. The duty of confidentiality is essential in the Army. This should be the same in the Education, Justice, etc. … The principle of respect must be extended to secular politics in the School.

Why this shame to refuse to see the truth in the face? History shows that dictatorships have always try to hide their atrocities (they were ashamed!). Why do you hide this truth? Would you fear her so? If you think you do not kill humans "but mere clusters of cells, as suggested by your friends", these images should not shock you! Yet if this offends you! Are you afraid of this sad truth and unfortunately it is better to hide the people, so that people can sleep peacefully? Once again I realize that all truth is not good to say! This teacher was, after all a sacred courage to try a shake the conscience of the people! They need to share this world with completely adrift.

Since when teachers are paid to be propagandists for or against abortion. Are the classes are not made for studies,?

Okay, this professor did not use their courses to get his own ideas. I'm surprised that teachers do not show the same zeal when it comes to punishing colleagues who openly disseminating propaganda Communist without any penalty. Even with the tacit support of their superiors. Are there good and bad features overruns in education?

Shameful. One teacher did not introduce his personal opinions other than socialist in his class. I'm horrified at the idea that a teenager, having seen the film in question, chose not to have unprotected sex and unbridled , destroying all hopes of catching AIDS or abortion. However, college kid, a teacher was the propaganda of his ecological ideas, what is more he forced his students to watch a movie unbearable images him walking in nature. Remember that education should serve national brainwashing that the ideas of Left and nothing else. All others must be punished. Kill the black sheep, only the pro-abortions have a right to speak in class (and in the media, unless the issue is intended to discredit those who think differently by ridiculing) . Once and for all, values that must be borne by the national education should be those of the Little Red Book. Once and for all, values that must be borne by the national education should be those of the Little Red Book dupart French Socialist and no other. For us the only way to impose them on everyone. Pubs impact on road safety or cancers caused by tobacco, we were right but not the dogs who think differently from us. Equal rights for all those who think like us, but not freedom of expression (in the media, the Internet, in books, etc …) or thinking (can you even say that someone who is not our opinion "thinks" it's just a dog that should be taught good manners) for those who are not our minds because they are wrong and we are right. Debunking the Gulag, down with the enemies of the people, long live the revolution, long live Stalin Vive Che Guevara. To answer the question, he must be punished for forcing students to watch bloody and traumatic images. But many students take the "ideas" and manipulation of teachers (call to events, ideas communists / anarchists with a vengeance, …) of. But many students take the "ideas" and manipulation of teachers (call to events, ideas communists / anarchists with a vengeance, …) demanière daily (I still recall my history teacher in 1990 daughter of foot Black, who had adopted a baby who was Lebanese and left against the far right and we talked most of his life and his political views of history) and no one moves and none of these teachers do are punished. If we punish this man for pictures gore, punished those who must watch the pictures of death camps, unit 731, the Sabra and Shatila, Viet Nam (and all wars elsewhere), of road accidents, illness (a biology teacher showed us the consequences of cancer on the body, yuck!), slaughtering animals, etc. … So not only those who are anti-abortion, otherwise it is a political sanction. That said, abortion is on cell mass without a conscience, then on bits of meat, so what did he see in the traumatic pieces of bloody meat?? They have nothing human, biological waste. It's not like we saw. It's not like we saw desbras, a head and legs, eh!

A gross violation of right of reservation … I guess even from guys who spend their time accusing the teacher to distill a "leftist propaganda". The fact that we are for or against abortion has nothing to do with it. If additional an ideological propaganda nauseating is traumatized students, it becomes even more unacceptable.

you are for abortion? for the killing of 200,000 children per year in France alone?? shame!

You explain it as you explained to us. He has three days he should be able to understand things as simple

Another account of Nikolai?

made him a drawing! ^ ^

Troll 2. My 2

Apparently your baby is about anything, milk is not to his taste. Be wary about the diet of your nurse, babies are never wrong about what's good for their health. They need to trust children .

You let another woman breastfeed your baby ?????????????? Nan but I dream!

Your baby is already coming in three days as a pretext to nourish a funny face! Precocious kid.

a good slice of bacon in a bottle

goat milk you m / surprised that the kid wants it not evolve scaffold

troll

If he has three days happened to mention is that the milk of its nurse is + that good for him, she should not entertain racist but rather to benefit babies who preach peace in the future without people like you and your baby of 3 days !!!!!

at this age, they know how to talk, lol

LOL

there is enough bars !!!!!! lol

if head pain, it should not be hungry … Perhaps he needs the suction to get to sleep? Has a pacifier?

I totally agree with Hilary Clinton. And we must continue to educate boys and girls … make them responsible adults! Abortion is not contraception.

But there are stupid or what! A girl of immature age has no right to lie and tell them there is nothing that inadmissiblee

Hello, Quite agree with Shah, abortion is not a contraceptive! Must empower their people face prick who generates life and stop trivializing abortion. I was well educated, in respect of women and our bodies … even now, my wife does not take the pill and I use condoms, it is safer for the health of my épouse.Et it does not detract from the fun! educate and empower everyone on the role of his genitals and reasons to take the fruit.

It has nothing to do with the abortion itself but with the prevention of abortions which is totally different

Hi, As a democrat, Clinton is pro-choice meaning of the following definition. I totally approve. Should be left to each woman the freedom to choose to accept or refuse life, including as a last resort, abortion. "Pro-choice (pro-choice English, is to say "the choice") is a generic term for movements that advocate for political and ethical idea that women should have control over their pregnancy and fertility. Added including sexual freedom, the right recourse to legal abortion and supervision, and choice of contraception. It is contrasted in this context, the pro-life, where women's freedom can not be used as an argument to dispute the right to life of the embryo. "

Normal, it is probably part of the globalists who seek to stop as many people as possible on earth in order to conserve resources. I think she should probably give a damn women, his goal is his agenda for the New World Order …

"The extraordinarily high rate of maternal mortality in the world, in countries where women lack access to family planning is a great tragedy," Clinton said Tuesday, adding that it is a major concern for the administration of Barack Obama. She says the promotion of contraceptives for both men and women, could help prevent abortions.

I remember a video showing JMLP giving a slap to one elected who did not share his ideas …

the fn represents nothing and it will never be in power so the woman and the immigrant can sleep on both noreilles! bin @ Mister Hyde yes a guy like that can not be head of state if he does not keep his blood Another cold front was president he puts France in trouble is the war because of Conard too nervous! what kills me is that many voted for that spot after that! they say after me I ' France loves you idiots like my girlfriend says! lol

The FN and contradictions? A long history. …

The FN fight especially against fundamentalism, and he's right.

not looking too. Consistency and solid frame is not the height of the FN. All that matters simple and short ideas that affect the masses and quickly attract hordes of voters with easy ideas to coffee trade. … The rest you know ….

Hi Voodoo, Excellent question, do you know that the whole program of the FN is to promote the return of women at the stove? A + +

a woman who aborts because she forgets to take pills, you speak ……. abortion involves killing a fetus, then a human being is a crime.200.000 deaths / year! If you defend the criminals, of course …. And then this way of mixing abortion and racism and Islamophobia, how bazaar!

You'd be better t'insurger against the fact that there are over 220,000 abortions a year in France! That is the reality. The horror is to see that abortion is a form of contraception. I'm sorry, but aside for exceptional and serious cases (birth, disease, rape or risk to the mother's life) the massive use of abortion is immoral and shows that our society no longer knows where it goes. On the other hand, in its 2007 program, the FN has said he would not prohibit abortion, but he proposed natalist policy and support for families, because women often give up another child for economic reasons. Besides this, the birth rate in France will not allow a renewal of public good which is a problem for pensions and seriously threatens our division, itself derived from the aftermath. Wanting to protect the lives of women and their unborn children is not archaic to me. For it is the entire society. For it is the society we protect entièreque. By cons, advocate at random through the right to abortion with pride, as if we were talking about right to vote, seems absolutely indecent and immoral. All this has nothing to do with Sharia, which represents a veritable wall of silence for Muslim women, rape them of their integrity and their natural rights. Do not mix everything!

yes

Find yourself a little better. Marine Le Pen simply does not go back on the right to abortion. This was not the case with his old dad, but given his age I'll teach you anything by telling you that this is not really him that he must look when we speak of the FN.

J e'm against abortion, but in case of rape. Navy because it has no right to kill a fetus. You smell the Gauchia!

The most horrible is that these swellings want to limit the right of women to control their body just for a history of FIGURES! The answer is pretty frightening Celeste about it, the name of the sacrosanct figure of population turnover, it wants to restore the subjugation of women in their uterus (and thus implicitly to men because they have to be two to one child) … It speaks volumes about their conception of man and his freedom, right? For those who doubt this, look carefully at the FN deny women access to abortion because it supports the recognition of being human DESIGN her to death … Abortions occurring after conception, abortion is found then banned … Saying that the FN does not want to remove this law is a LIE! @ Celeste: stop playing with words and avoids one person who does the same … The position of FN is clear: "the affirmation of the human right to be protected by law from conception to natural death." Although they intend to propose this by. 'Certainly, they intend to propose this parreferendum, but it is loud and clear! Reread the program of your party or stop lying … As for the little one pen, it has not succeeded to the throne of the FN. ..

ditto for the bi cos nè sandstone and your IS lam

The program does not oppose abortion …. he just said that abortion is not a means of contraception at last …. I think.

yes but the bubbles of fart popes soon anyway, the poor. we talk about love when they are "down in the polls" and they come up against people when they have power is a bit of history church.

Want to abortive 't prevents

I am an atheist, but I do not equate "Catholics" and the Vatican ….. Rowan Williams of Canterbury Archèque about the Church of Ireland has described the situation …. but hey, when one also knows that the statements it has made towards the Sharia in Britain …. we must remain cautious … http://www.lemonde.fr/europe/article/2010/04/03/pour-l-eglise-anglicane-l-eglise-catholique-a-perdu-toute-credibilite_1328266_3214.html I wonder if, as in the world "layman", the Church and the Vatican are not totally disconnected from their base …. as are the politicians, most citizens ….

AC is more classic than dying "" PAPAL the adage is still valid: Do as I Say, but not what I ………….. Do!

It was not us poor believers, need to ask these questions, but to the authorities. And as they seem to be silent instead of explaining the reason for their silence, to me they give me the desire to apostasy. Do not take us for fools … A large household must be done at the Vatican, otherwise they will lose many parishioners.

Listen I do not know what church you belong to but thanks iol we are sick your little squabble between religion. The world will be much better if the monks stay in their place and not to mingle in the lives of people from elsewhere what rights as a human being would give you lessons to others???? But what right???? you're GODS ????????

Abraham, you should have slain your son … it would have spared humanity good shit!

the first Bible (which no longer exists) condemned abortion as well as pedophilia and god theres never ask what it represents on earth. the papacy is a big farce continued nilly to function and the Vatican is more a cult than anything else legal.

yes they are still holding more to their church and their pope in taking this line of defense? "But the popes are also genuine counterinsurgency Catholic: No condoms, no abortions, no married priests, no. … no … AND not seen pedophiles not taken … hide those poor fishermen can not see it … and even pray for their salvation, and if they revert to their fish forgive them again '! What should not be heard …. they just do not say that abused children will earn heaven through suffering … My dear brother, let us rejoice and sing in the Hallelujah joy of the Church!

Exactly! you summaries of the problem. Real hypocrites!

Workstations bin ………

Try contacting Sibelin by mp. She knows it really well on the issues and may help you and give you full advice.

I know you can start breastfeeding even if not immediately. La Leche League contacts. I'll put a star to attract the true connoisseurs lol! Good luck, I hope it will work!

http://www.lllfrance.org/Allaiter-Aujourd-hui/AA-63-Relactation-lactation-induite.html I hope it helped somewhat! the Good standing is not adopted then the logically should be easier! !

hello, it would be best to seek medical advice and does not satisfy you some answers. the child is a precious gift, take good care of your love.

the trouble is that to expect a rise in milk, should you put that baby in now, only I think the medication you take may make your milk unfit for consumption. Whatever The most important thing you pump up morale. Congratulations on your baby, Rest well!

It must be possible, even if it seems difficult. But I am not a specialist. I would simply say: be careful with the seals, we must be sure they have done for effect and that products are completely dissipated, because it certainly goes in the milk (colostrum same lme) and it must be terrible for the baby. You should seek advice from La Leche League or other breastfeeding specialist in any case to a physician for the issue of stamps. Otherwise, I suppose he must put the baby in as much as possible to stimulate the rise. And pray that baby wants to breastfeed well, having been accustomed to the bottle and takes it correctly without hurting yourself. If you can, tell us about, it would be great!

Yes you can. I'll look for the links that I gave to someone else and come back. That is below what I had written, in fact, it is quite possible for you, it will not cause too much trouble, for thou hast given birth very recently and then you still have your hormones are your allies for re-stimulating your breast milk production. What you should do is stop taking the medication and food galactogen and stimulate your breasts or a breast pump or by putting your baby in as much as possible the links below to speak. This works for women who adopt a child, then for you it will work. "Restimulate your lactation, you don 't have thought. Http://www.allaitement-jumeaux.com/espace-allaitement/lait-maternel/ re-lactation-CAS01-taken-by-parlodel-erreur.php It seems that even women who adopted a baby managed to get milk through the adopted baby to the breast. http://www.femininbio.com/ maman/allaitement/allaiter-un-bebe-adopte-2.html So if it is possible to secrete milk. html So, if it is possible to secrete laitlorsqu'on adopt a baby, it should be possible to reproduce the rise of milk for her own baby, even if it took pills not to breastfeed. It is a runway as another. Seeing that your baby does not tolerate milk, it may be a possibility and it does not cost you anything to try to re-stimulating your breasts to produce milk. It'll just ask for patience and time. If I were you, I will contact someone from La Leche League on their site, they also speak http://www.lllfrance.org/Allaiter-Aujourd-hui/AA-63-Relactation-lactation-induite.html?q breastfeeding = arr + after + we find this passage is interesting: "Some factors in the baby …: its behavior and in the quality of his sucking reflex; age (infants under 3 months will be easier in return, either spontaneously or with an accompaniment, it can be more difficult for babies between 3 and 6 months); his experience during the time (he had a breastfeeding experience before stopping the Breastfeeding. : Behavior in and the quality of his sucking reflex; age (infants under 3 months can more easily go in, either spontaneously or with an accompaniment, it can be more difficult for babies between 3 and 6 months); his experience during the time (he had a breastfeeding experience before stopping the allaitementou adoption and how long?) … and factors specific to the mother. First his motivation and availability. Initially, it must actually be able to invest much time. After birth, the rapidly decreasing progesterone and prolactin reached a significant level that gradually descends. So, earlier relactation is begun, it will be easier. But no date has discouraged a mother. Only attempt to give answers. In my practice, and I saw a baby of 3 months were never breastfed and hospitalized for severe allergy to return to full breastfeeding in a fortnight and then be breastfed up to 2 years. "

Hi, how you doing nothing to see my answer j'savais but as you are about to give birth I wanted to know what had happened after the loss of mucus plug, regarding your question, sorry I never experienced this kind of situation or around me. Good luck