Because it's the same when they start to become too annoying.

Unfortunately, it is also the age when he comes home in the freezer.

Because the newborn that you gat all your nights screaming race, you find it annoying?

Yes, you have two sessions of catch-up after 3 years or 15 years later, the choice knowing that you can not take both, yeah bah logic, even for a blonde.

The Catholic religion prohibits abortion from conception. According to secular laws is permitted abortion until a date which varies from 12 weeks to 9 months after conception, but against all logic not only allows after that time to my knowledge.

abortion is haram

you can disable it relates the size of the lotto!

You referred to Islam! But what religion was it designed a blonde too clever?

In when pregnancies that lasted ten years with no sign outside and no discomfort!

Abortion is already a crime against humanity! After three years, the child is great and made the first silly as we do at that age.

You want an abortion an elephant or something?

vi bah, I was still too Treaty of abortion, too yesterday

Do not tell me that a sperm has no soul alive! @ Sylbao For you avoid answering a spermatozoon has no soul. @ You've reached is there to kill a chick in the egg? It is the same thing!

And therefore, an ejaculation is a genocide? In these conditions all humanity is guilty, but what exactly?

then I will join the paradise of bacteria and viruses, in this case.

Play on words if you please, the fact is that it is against the law to kill a human being. Now, we know when an embryo becomes a human being. The law provides an answer, we now have to judge their eligibility. An abortion is not an arbitrary act, but can we tolerate that women are not masters of their destiny through prohibition? There are still forty anyway abortions, take all this and provide a legal and health to the practice. This finding goes hand in hand with other social issues!

if so and even after the blow to vacuum it will mount directly to paradise ..

You better hypocritically prefer that your daughters birth under X, honor Judeo-Christian will be safe, let me laugh ,,,,, and tell you that I at least I fought for the right to abortion, soul is just an excuse of religion,

This is not a "murder" than to eliminate a pile of cell formation. This is not an arbitrary act, too, agree. But the embryo is still part of the body of the mother, who was free on him. It's very strange, I've never seen someone who was going to believe that sperm has a soul. And the egg too?

To each his freedom and his responsibility!

@ Odette, I know some Christians who support abortion as I know of lay hardcore, eaters of priests opposed to abortion because they consider excessive "When you know that some couples can not adopt and that some women or Sterile men have to be (e) s. As said Celine abortion is our kids and we take pity on our mutt! @ Odette, hehe, you disappoint me, you who often dragged into the category philosopher, with shortcuts to arrive amalgams as cheesy! You obviously have never read Céline your life! When you know that Celine even treated Hitler Jew!

ODETTE @:::: to each his own conscience you're no better than n those who think otherwise,,,, c is a good question you can fight for everything and no matter what it does not make you a person who holds the I ca tell truth without wickedness and I likes people who think about this kind of subject

The sperm has no soul because it has to be joined to an egg to produce a human. Only after fertilization we must consider that commits homicide by removing the created by it, and therefore that all abortion is one. Indeed, there is indeed a clear distinction between being resulting from the fertilization of an ovum and a sperm and each of these elements. However, we could not establish a real distinction between the different stages of development of a living being. Saying that abortion is not a crime because it affects only a cluster of cells, ie a being unconscious, may give ammunition to those who would kill someone for his sleep after all During this time, there is no more conscious than an embryo. This could therefore allow any abuse services to special interests at the expense of those who are not considered quite "aware". And is it not the glory of a civilization to defend the weak before the strong? As. And is it not the glory of a civilization to defend the weak before the strong? Quantal two other arguments very often to defend abortion, they leave just as easily refuted: that abortion is legal, because the embryo belongs to his mother, is confused inclusion relation and relationship membership, it does not mean that we belong to a house because it is inside of it! And pretend that women who have unwanted children are aborted as well for their sake and for that of their child, which could not be reared in good conditions is to invoke conditions that are extrinsic to the nature of the act that sought to declare: that logic, it is equally justify infanticide, when parents become unemployed, or even physical extermination of people without resources. And yet no one defends it, because we know that these situations can be treated with humanity, including the establishment of an adequate social protection system. So when we also know that many people want to adopt. So when we also know that many people want to adopt Lesenfants they did not have this latter justification of abortion also falls.

The sperm do not think so. The egg does not think so. The egg-cell does not think so. A fetus is not yet a person, he has no identity: he does not know his name, date of birth, place of birth, name of his mother, his mother's face, much less the name and face of his father. In addition, changes in the brain are in the last days before birth, so as is a fetus, no problem of conscience. Indeed, a fetus is not killed, as it is not fully alive (not alive in the scientific sense, but in the social and psychological sense). In comparison, it costs a little someone to unplug one in a coma, but someone who has no name, no identity, which has seen nothing, done nothing at all … The memories will never go back until 4-5 years that the age stated that they recalled before, we merely imagine. This proves that identity is formed later. Then, it can ruin their future, but it can also avoid ruining the future of the father, mother and child!

The question as to when the baby has a soul is frankly hypocritical. I have nothing against abortion, in a sense it is a tool of social control that allows women to maintain a modicum of control over part of their existence in which they sometimes lack … But with a minimum of lucidity we can very well imagine that the argument of "my body belongs to me" would have no recourse in a hypothetical ideal world where rape would not exist and where contraception would be trivial and systematic manner when required. The fact is that it just seems more logical to focus on a being alive and palpable as a small piece of flesh barely alive who has not been named yet … On a hypocrite consensus we accept this sacrifice for the order and benefit the greatest number, but out of pity that one ceases to look for ethical-metaphysical justification for this act, which then goes to explain that the ex-mothers-to-be that they have no reason to cry over their fate because they have failed to nothing but a piece of meat …

Yes abortion is a crime to be innocent without a cutter défonce.Sauf if there is a problem.

The causes are multiple. It could include (in order): 1 – Problem of Education. When you know that contraceptives exist, or that they are "forbidden" by a "higher moral authority" (usually male) as a religion, unwanted pregnancies are legion. This section could also add the fact that motherhood is considered a "women's business". So we (men) also believes that contraception is "women's issue". So if both partners use contraception the risk of unwanted pregnancy is very low, 2 – Access and use of contraceptives. Although contraceptives are known by the partners already has a financial cost. And a product like the pill is prescription only. This means the need to pass before the doctor every time that the order has expired. While on this point, France is changing. Furthermore, the use of the pill. Furthermore, the use of pilulenécessite to think continuously. For the hood is a bit like that, it must have one on hand each time, 3 – Men and women are not saints. Because of this, and yes men religious, they need to experience sexual pleasure. And therefore they can not just be abstinent. In this section you can also add a "risk taking" which is the "I did not have facilities at hand. So much for that one time is unlikely to get pregnant."

No, wrong. You're blonde or do you purposely ask stupid questions, Fati?

we do not say "get pregnant"

But no, not at all.

ask a gynecologist

go, thank you, one more question to my collection! does not stop most is cool! bizzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

I found this site with the risks of abortion http://www.avortementivg.com/pages/Avortement_IVG__les_risques-684517.html

I've never heard of it, not worry ma'am, but the safest thing is to consult your doctor, and one who told you that does not get pregnant is bein said.

not, by cons, after issues such as this, you have every chance to lay eggs … like a turkey.

Not more than aborting after having a baby.

I have not a girlfriend who aborted 3 times and not sterile

It depends on how abortion has happened and the consequences (infection, bleeding, perforation) before abortion was legalized because the most common health effects were not the same.

The moderating Islamophobic propaganda – which I see for my part, as a feminist fools, in the very sense of anti-Semitism has been rightly considered a "socialism of fools" – regrets that Muslims and Muslim s do 'express little to defend feminism, the republic, secularism, etc.. Sometimes, however, Muslim women speak on feminism – or trying to do. For those that take time to read what they can have to say that most interested in the eternal lament of the invisibility of their way, here are some stories of women wearing the veil and claim their feminism on the conditions under which they do, and the obstacles they face. L emancipation of Muslim women could not be better achieved by the Muslim themselves, will you side with those who are promoting the image, or against them? Will you, despite their veils, along with those who claim the free disposal of their. Pharisee @ Liberated You're right, it is misleading not to commune with the current xenophobic French companies in its stigma and amalgamedes immigrants through Islam and the staging of its media avatars more obviously alienating. With demand for critical thinking of Marx and not give any credibility to a government and a head of state, especially those we are currently experiencing with regard to their claims for a secular and feminist commitment is obviously a contradiction on my part rough, and you've seen. Mea culpa. Exclude veiled teenage school system, punishing women victims of oppression archaic as the port imposed a cover in public, that's obviously emancipatory measures to help them free themselves from the grip against their of bearded fundamentalists, but as I have very bad spirit, I am just being biased. @ Sick 'n Destroy I totally agree with you that no one can seriously say feminist claim a religion in itself without causing considerable contradictions. But the problem seems to me another priority in. But the problem seems primarily other eneffet. The context of stigma and racist repression does not seem at all conducive to the maturing of this kind of contradiction – like many others, too. Instead, the defense of free discussion, confrontation and therefore the free access to public space, and the possibility of conflicting arguments with veiled women – which also means they do not prohibit them under the pretext of their veils, voice, and that scans do not have anything they can say on behalf of it: what many feminists have done so far, alas -: the radical rejection of the blackmail Official therefore the so-called "secularism" – seem to present a minimum.

To answer the question! "Will you, despite their veils, along with those who claim the free disposal of their bodies and the right to abortion? Give you just a little attention to what they have to say? "Yes, always!

To answer you: "Will you, despite their veils, along with those who claim the free disposal of their bodies and the right to abortion? Give you just a little attention to what they have to say ? "Obviously. A woman is a woman, with or without a veil for me. So yes, a woman has the right to freely dispose of his body, and yes I listen when I speak. I listen even those I do sometimes think of evil. Simply because if I refused to listen, I will feel to become even more pitcher than I already am. By the way, I liked the two links.

Of course he must support them, they like others, for "the disposal of their bodies and the right to abortion." The veil is another subject that appeals to nostalgia for certain authoritarian policies. The veil is the Muslim religion that the skirt is to the Catholic religion. Should we assume that all women who wear skirts to submit to the constraints of old states who obeyed blindly patriarchal concepts of the Catholic Church, and therefore they are Catholic fundamentalists, who do not deserve to comment on feminist cause? it would be funny. and even if they did, they would have every right to comment on the feminist cause (and on any subject!). and yet it is the trial is being done towards the veil.

Personally, I make the distinction between Muslims and jihadists. If I chose my side in the psychological warfare that we are one sly, it does not stop me from treating others as I have always done in public. Because, as a democrat, I find it normal. And more reason, it would give a victory for jihad that unite all Muslims.

Admittedly, this is a realistic observation and "positive." But if we abandon this political fact for a moment that you husk with a sharpness too rare in political thinking, still does not he still a contradiction between women's emancipation and being eligible to remain in the religious affirmation of liberation? No monotheistic religion does not tolerate really feminist demands. It can be practiced without some contortions and feminist notional perfectly hypocritical. Or is that reinvents his religion on a personal level, which is in contradiction with "re-ligere. Every religion is pro-life and pro-herd. The individual is an idea, a word without reality in the mouth of a practitioner, and ideological freedom is not compatible with. Not that there is a religion more stupid than the others, just different states of acceptance by the progress of individual liberties in the West and elsewhere … So I would fully agree with your resume and less on Marx. So I would fully agree with your resume and less on Marx ladefense Muslim women supposedly feminist, and I am far from being aligned with Marxism in general …

I do not terrorism in the other direction, that addresses Islamophobic anyone who criticizes (in the sense argument against argument) Islam. As for those women, yes we are still at their side that's the criticism I address them: – Wearing the veil is placed anywhere in the Quran, the Muslims of France are mostly North Africans who have never worn the veil in France or in their countries of origin, veiling is therefore an expression of political Islam and committed. It raises the perennial problem of representation of Muslims. This group can speak in its name because it is not representative of Muslims or Islam … – They say the choice of abortion but point "is an acquired right, which is accurately recognized and codified in texts of Islamic reference. " What does that mean? they oppose the laws feminist / Republican who are not recognized by Islamic law? – they will be for the separation of men and. What does that mean? they oppose the laws feminist / Republican who are not recognized by Islamic law? – they will be for the separation of men and desfemmes in universities, swimming pools, hospitals, … current demands of the Muslims 'involved' – What is their position on Muslim countries that impose the veil on women, they can not ignore the reality of Islam that rightly cause an outcry here: the minority of veiled French are protected by the laws of the Republic but the majority of veiling in the Muslim world suffer. So once again I'm alongside all feminists without distinction, but there you arrive quickly at the edge of the thing …

oops … these stories are too long to read, but for me, browsing in the diagonal I realize there are a lot of Islamophobia in all this. By putting things in my view white woman's secular France from below, I admit be uncomfortable with women wearing the veil but he'll come to me any insult to the spirit of these women as in the cases described in these articles. Each his way of living, secular or religious! (Who am I to judge?) I am also sure that if I had the opportunity to speak with a veiled woman (from this and many other things, there's so much to share among women!) that this gene would disappear. Ignorance is certainly the cause of much misunderstanding. … In short I'm scared to see women's movements can also stigmatize violently veiled woman, while the latter they also fought-for freedom of women! "Will you, despite their veils, along with those. I'm scared to see women's movements can also stigmatize veiled woman violently, so that they are fighting themselves, also for the freedom of women! "Will you, despite their veils, along with the free cellesqui claim disposal of their bodies and the right to abortion? Give you just a little attention to what they have to say? "Yes, yes of course

I will always side with women and their rights! That is clear. But the veil is not and never will be a right to dispose of his body as abortion. Certainly not! Women do not have to be submitted! Women do not hide … NOTHING can justify it. However, wear a scarf over her hair and veil, this is not the same thing. But it can not be justified by religion.

very interesting, you let me take your links on R & S

>> "If Islamophobia is satisfied, therefore, ample room for a media storm stigmatizing the staging of repression, and a pseudo unanimity principle (of the extreme left to extreme right, all of agree to attack Islam, "the conceptual framework is biased, one wonders what is the rest of it? In fact, we can both ambient and Islamophobia invoqeer a claim of Marx" criticism of religion is the prerequisite to the review of the policy. "For example:>>" Will you, despite their veils, along with those who claim the free disposal of their bodies and the right to abortion? "The problem is not" to be with. "The claim of right to abortion is not" the right of free disposal of their bodies. "This includes the right to be veiled or not the right to challenge the patriarchal order of virginity imposed on women and not men, short of a moral sexual double. This included the right to be veiled or not, the right to challenge the patriarchal order of virginity imposed on women and not men, short of a moral sexual doublestandard. The right to contraception and Abortions should be supported wherever women deem necessary. We must also remember that this right is intensely political in that it is a right "of free inquiry" is not a right "requirement" but a "right-choice" in this sense offers q'uil women all that he denies the ongoing reform of Islam is confined to the limitation of the freedom of women (the Algerian family code, so-called obligation of the veil, etc. …)

Abortion among oviparous? This conceptual

For as 7,000,000,000 is too fly for the planet @ priestess: a true believer there is nothing to fuck the science is that it is mesnsonge and cons abortion worms if necessary

I know that "religion and spirituality" is broad enough as a concept, but there you beat the record! I would rather for their sex education and contraception.

Birds and reptiles eat the flies, therefore I am against.

I claim the right to tranquility outdoors!

Be more concise my Father. Against abortion flies in Australia or against Australian abortion flies? This is not the same thing.

A girl of 13 fell pregnant, she admitted that it was his fault that his good admetons be your girl for or against abortion?

I let him choose

At the bottom against the criminalization of abortion. At the bottom against the priests who seek to ban it.

we must first make an ultrasound, if the future will be born a male, he must not abort, if it is a female, she has the choice to abort or not!

Story on a case by case

situation is complicated as an abortion is always painful, and pregnancy in early adolescence is too early …

Pray and give masses

Hello, When he had to listen to God, "multiply" the earth was certainly empty. When one goes to God in our lives and that we reach a critical mass of 7 billion people on such a small planet. You need written permission from God to respond to the problem? Admittedly, times are changing and that the writings do not fix the evolution of life. Word of sanity

Thorny. But I'm for, provided they respect his choice, despite his young age. Do not force a decision already painful in itself that will determine his life.

Not that I'm for abortion … This arrangement might suggest that remained in some listening of the word "abortion" I put myself to jump for joy, shouting Yepeee! However, I am for women's right to make that painful decision and they can go to a medical facility of choice … be against abortion, is taking the risk that the mother also died too … As was often the case before … But anyway, it is better to talk early with these children about here … So they are accused of almost everything … And not just for the risk of unwanted pregnancy elsewhere. 1'Um1

against abortion, even if my daughter is a sin and a murder of an abortion unless the doctor authorizes you to do after a complication

The question would be: "What is most painful for the girl, the physical and psychological trauma of abortion (loss of life, her child) or youth cut short by the fact that s' care of his child? "

The girl is a minor, it will, if you are his mother, fully assume the responsibility for the child if you are against abortion. Otherwise, you risk breaking seulemtn not a life, but two.

Always cons. If my daughter, I will do the necessary to raise the child and ensure that my daughter can grow and build enough to eventually take care of herself when she is ready (and feel so ). (That said, I'm sad because it will mean I missed something in the education of my daughter's sexuality is a fact, is associated with procreation, so 13 years is far too early to assume). This is not because there are difficult situations which makes some basic principles (such as respect for human life) can be forgotten, however, is precisely in difficult cases that the principles are all the more necessary. But I also think that there must be a better aid the care of children (or orphanages for really difficult situations), rather than aid to kill them before the birth … Oh, yes, and in this case, too: the father, depending on circumstances, he might be taking a chapter on liability, even my fist in the mouth by age …

FOR !!!!. The woman should have the opportunity to remain mistress of her motherhood. Men do not have this problem, it would not be fair to ban women. Obviously, it is better to focus on contraception as abortion is a traumatic act. But when you can not do otherwise there is no other solution.A +

Cons. This nearly happened to my daughter too (14 years) but we would not accept abortion. Abort is to kill.

In this case I am against abortion but there are cases where I am in: When there was a deviation from the conduct of one partner.

These decisions are very difficult to make, and this must be done case by case basis. If the doctor says that my daughter can give birth safely, I am against it. I'll take care of myself as a child my daughter is not able to do so. For cons, I was for abortion of early Brazilian 9, who had been raped and was pregnant with twins because his life was in danger. That poor kid, not only was martyred for a long time, but it would still have to pay with his life the cruelty of the rapist? But a general rule, I am against abortion, especially as it is practiced now, without scruple, (200,000 abortions in France every year!)

He is the father, mother and daughter pregnant … dialogue, reasoning, the pregnant girl should be the one who decides for his welfare and parents spokesman for they shall be those who will support them. The test is not the rational choice, but the psychological effects to come.

with 7 ways to contraception pill The male condom The female condom The Spermicides IUD contraceptive implant Emergency contraception besides abortion! (I'm not talking about rape) but there is more, the sex education in school and parents, when I think of our grandmothers, or is the EVOLUTION ??????

because nothing is 100% safe, the only way not to have children is abstinence

It's hard as a question, I say "I'd better about the education I give to my daughters?" It's not just me, Me, my mother did not speak at all, just j ' were cautious of someone who has never done anything without contraception. But every child, every teenager is different and I think today that parents have a role then a few years ago, parents cared less. Compared to my mother, I could easily get pregnant if I had not myself noticed.

It is true that if we use these seven contraception at the same time, there is surely no chance for pregnancy in a desired, but otherwise nothing is over 100%!

Yes it's crazy, certain women do not even know their body …

Question …. It is difficult to separate "unwanted pregnancy" and "infanticide" Infanticide, when you comets, you're not already well in your head! An unwanted pregnancy can happen to each of us. No contraception is 100% reliable. Ado I got pregnant on pill that I have never forgotten my friend and we do all the tests for STDs docn no hood, luckily I'm a miscarriage. I had sex education in my mother, not school. If you have parents who do not speak and that you are most likely shy how do you know how "it works"? "I am so when I hear éfarée unwanted pregnancy but no protection, that is playing Russian roulette! Each unwanted pregnancy is different from a woman / teen to another, do not judge anyone on anything. "Effectively we have everything available to avoid pregnancy but equally lives and different bodies, is not between all. Indeed, we have everything available to avoid pregnancy but also all life and a different body, one between toutesdans not the same mold. Me: pregnant twice under pilulles, now I am rejecting my IUD, I recommended the implant because I have blood pressure problems and I'm too young to do tubal ligations ….. how do I? An abortion as I see fit? No! I decided to continue the pill after my pregnancy hoping to find one that suits me the first time. So yes I believe it has what it takes to address this problem, but does not everyone in the same basket. By

Sex education is failing. Many parents do not address the subject with their children, sometimes through neglect, sometimes also for cultural or religious reasons. The school should take over, but unfortunately does not yet consistently. Many women also live in total denial of their body, which is even more irresponsible, but rather of psychiatric disorder , as is the case for these women infanticide.

How our time women can take this kind of talk. Nothing is 100% reliable contraception and even if we took together. The 7 means of contraception that you list. to get pregnant. If you look at the statistics the majority of women who are abortion subisses contraceptives. An evil pill dose, vomited or forgetting can lead to pregnancy. Ditto for cracking a condom, the IUD does not safer from the implant or the spermicides that emergency contraception. The human body is also self-defense and can react badly to any of these contraceptives. In matters of sexuality, we are now in a society highly erotic, sex is trivialized. It became normal to have several partners to make love to everyone and anyone with … Yes I do think that sex education should be reviewed and adapted to our present society and no longer be confined to the reproductive cycle. But also talk about contraception,. But also talk about contraception, abortion, pregnancy and nervous denial of pregnancy, risky sexual behavior and also respect for his body and that of others. Schools and parents should stick to it. After the debate on infanticide is part of the things that we always existed, but then nobody ever talks about. It's like pedophilia to begin to be unveiled there in just fifteen years. Pedophilia women also remains a taboo while there pretty well. It is good that all this is now revealed. We are definitely changing but there is still much to do communications. Besides, if you want to develop lean on the problem of unwanted pregnancies that will force our way of thinking our way of life instead of saying that you do not understand why all this things still happen in this century. Gynecological medicine may well have changed there are still many questions that remain unanswered. The medicine has not yet divine power …

When you read some of the questions wondering if they are pregnant, I think there's still a lot of work on sex education …. Lots of work! And many parents refuse this discussion with their children when they are teenagers. I prefer to buy a packet of condoms to my daughter and explain the functioning of all this. This does not encourage them to do but at least had the time comes, it will protect itself. My mother had this conversation with me At 15 and this is not why I moved to act.

Good question, should ask the people concerned, I'd be curious about their responses. Perso I fell pregnant twice on the pill so that is how little it happen to everyone but then to have an abortion while in the basis is not well liked and no thank you. DDITION @: I do not understand women who kill their children if she did not want when it comes why not make motherhood even anonymously or do adopter.Pourquoi reach such actes.Il are lots of people who would be happy to have a child and who do not. Abortion is not a contraceptive!!

c good is not nearly done with your questions to 2 euros extremists. I'm for abortion and euthanasia.

When all babies born in artificial wombs connected to standalone machines and humans will be gone …… and many unwanted pregnancies infanticide no longer exist. Disabled either, since the diagnosis of defects, either, since ultrasound either, since not gynécos RISK ……. 0, ERROR 0 …. 0 and humanity be human is to accept not control everything: we are not machines, and happily.

For infanticide, in my town, a mother threw her baby out the window of the 8th floor as she lives opposite the maternity! For unwanted pregnancies is due to carelessness, the People think it does not happen to them

Because sex is something taboo in many families the subject is not addressed in school it gets little or no. Since I work in my current box, I discovered that some, disadvantaged, lack access to information. It's amazing the number of people who can barely read and write.

Infanticide is usually after a denial of pregnancy. But it happens only in rare cases! The testimonies of women who undergo it that often in this sense: when the birth, she does not realize at once that work begins. For most it go to the bathroom because they think they are constipated! When infanticide is committed, the woman has an altered trial. Some women think that the baby is already dead or not viable. We must think of one thing: the woman who gave birth in her bathroom when she was just like going to the bathroom was totally unprepared for the arrival of this child. Presumably, the denial may be a "consequence" of all these means of contraception: "I take the pill, it is not possible for me to get pregnant" This conviction is such that women in denial does not suffer the symptoms of pregnancy: no nausea sometimes no amenorrhea. The stomach does not rounded and pelvis does not go. The stomach does not rounded and pelvis does not versl'avant. In short, the pregnancy goes undetected, both for the mom and her entourage. It should be noted that in most cases, these women are quite "normal". Have no personality disorder or intellectual. What is surprising is that during the announcement of a pregnancy already well under way denied to the mother, her body is changing very quickly, it resembles a pregnant woman . The denial is unrelated to education or evolution. Pregnancy initiates an important psychological process, which usually begins with the desire to have a child. This process prevents the psychological shock that is childbirth. The question is simple: how a person reacted to a sudden emotional shock? – Disclaimer – Fear – Anger – Acceptance – Adapting When you know it can take years to achieve acceptance after a psychological shock …

Believing? I remember that after use of free will by allowed religion, every offender will be notified of the life sentence of hell. Amen. Http://fr.answers.yahoo.com/question/index; _ylt = Ajs.wNyUXn1EBzPc88ZyUW44Agx.; _ylv = 3? Qid = 20100304113748AAioBJo

everyone is free to choose but not the consequences thereof. God has allowed the freedom to choose a Adam and Eve in the garden because the love without choice is not possible and God is love He desires that the free love is the reason for it We acres with a will. www.connaitredieu.com

to get everyone to agree that people do take precautions to avoid being forced to abort.

Abortion is never a murder because the embryo is not (yet) a man. St. Thomas Aquinas said it well: The embryo has a vegetable soul: he is like a plant: He grew up without a conscience. The fetus has a soul animal: it has a sort of early awareness: he can hear, suffer. At birth the baby has a human soul. Do not use the word of "man" for an embryo, or the words that go with it as "murder."

c etait and if god had wanted the abortion takes place? seen as ca c est bon?

There will have 85% of French women favor abortion seems to me that much, it meant that less than 25% shook Catholic, Muslim etc.? http://www.leparisien.fr/laparisienne/sante/85-des-francaises- are favorable al-IVG-04-03-2010-835911.php

I must surely be a bad believer, because for me, abortion is not murder

like putting a condom, I suppose you got another stupidity in reserve?

Thou shalt not kill Exodus 20, 13 This has the merit of clarity. Who says that man prefers Cain Abel? Those who deny this, are more the sin of lying EX20, 16 not even old should be killed by euthanasia, and especially not the state of the death penalty to those who support abortion, you made the dead each year? read the first line of the link, yes, yes, you read 50 million deaths each year worldwide! Innoua the dead of both world wars every year. http://www.avortementivg.com/Lavortement_dans_le_monde_pays_par_pays-690712.html you disturb you for an earthquake here and there? of cat pee! to see some of the posts I groaned poor people, why do not you understand? 5 Isaiah 5:20 Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light, and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter! 5:21 Woe to those who are wise in their eyes, and who think themselves intelligent

Scientifically speaking it is the moment of fertilization a new human being is created with a portion of the genetic heritage of his father and part of the genetic mother. A unique human being with his DNA and will feature its own until the end of his life, whether in the womb or 100 years later. Remove this human being before or after birth is murder.

This question has already been asked so many times that I will run for

At the time I made my ex abortive woman who had (for personal reasons) an extra marital relationship.

Abortion is both a denial of its own responsibility (to act as if the action had not occurred) and a crime (murder pure and simple of a human being). Abortion is a crime and a violation of divine laws.

FOR @ the truth I'm sure you're a guy … to be as c. .. me gay? you take your desires for realities stop the fantasies you're n not my style …

Totally for a woman's right to have its course as it wishes, and regardless of whether it is at the expense of someone who is not even recognized, and because other women who have the disorder fall pregnant unintentionally are sentenced to life with children they would not, as a human being (at least until birth) @ truth The real truth is that your mother would have done better to be a zoophile slut;) @ ² truth you are quite right, he is infinitely better to be a slut zoophile vermin! vermin are the people for abortion) @ all Jehovah's Witnesses or other religion, frustrated of Burns and even undesirable to representatives of the female population is a debate that you never carry away, for the simple reason that you put the same level criminal who deliberately enters a building to kill a public official (haha I 'm purposely chose this example for you to face the reality of governmentThey agree perfectly these laws since he introduced them) and a woman desiring an abortion for her health, or simply not to ruin his life (what you call may be "selfish" do not laugh the only selfish what are you hoping to prevent thousands of women with their bullshit and their reasons for abortion and what to name the con beliefs or mere "state of souls") that is hoping you will one day confront this situation; )

For …

for health reasons yes, but otherwise, people just need to protect themselves before.

Against

absolutely against killing babies, whatever the drawbacks to the comforts of their parents. for you, a human being is a human being when he leaves the womb and not before? is what can kill (abort) a day or a week before his birth, for example ??… and if your answer is no, then when it ceases to be a human being? a month before his birth? two months?

WHEN THE CHILD IS DESIGNED TO EVEN 1 DAY IT IS, THEN IT IS NOT THE TEU NOT ON THE ASSUMED AND ASKED TO HELP …. My mother nearly died giving birth to MOI J AI BANKRUPT AND DIE AT BIRTH, BUT MY MOTHER TO FIGHT FOR THAT REMAINS ON IN LIFE. THEN I'M NOT KILL HER CHILD …. HOWEVER COLLAPSES PARDON WHERE THERE WAS A RAPE OR 1 SIL 1 REASON IS EXTREME. IF THE LIFE OF THE MOTHER IN DANGER. OR 1 EXTREME BIRTH OF CHILD ALTHOUGH I CAN HUMP WITH THE DISABLED, THEY ARE HAPPY LIVING IN BRIEF ….. L ABORTION IS NOT AN ACT NO CONSEQUENCE AND SPIRITUAL karmic ASK A PRIEST 1, 1 RABBI IN THE OTHER WORLD THE PARENTS, THE GUY AND THE GIRL WILL MANAGE THIS MURDER …. WITH ALL MEANS contraception, abortion IS MURDER FOR NEGLIGENCE INCHES ….. THE BOTTOM, YOU RETURN, you sit on it .. ..

it is all about the situation

I think every woman should have the choice to choose and places continue to exist for an abortion, without being jugée.Toute person is free of what what she believes and no one has to intervene to prevent it from having an abortion or not.

against abortion is a crime!

Against! it is murder, it killed an innocent life that has nothing to ask! the pill and condoms are the child did not ask him. http://video.google.fr/videoplay?docid=-3187382679407562295 # ps contains shocking images. SlashL @ blabla repackages your sixty Eighter in life must be assumed to know! contraceptives are, why kill a baby while it is sufficient to make a minimum attention? the fetus is a living being (not just clusters of cells) abortion is murder PERIOD!. ps I am a Christian but not tj.

For you, what an embryo is a life or non life? No matter the difficulties before or after conception, how do you see life in its infancy, the answer will result automatically your perspective on life begins does the design or different stages of development and at birth!

It is God who gives life. and therefore to Him in return. Nobody else, but He has the right to take the life of someone (be it a fetus). for those who carry fetuses malformed or sick, or for those who have been victims of rape is difficult to bear, it's hard to accept but it's not impossible (possible with the grace and consolation that only the Lord Jesus gives). when confronted with this situation the first thing we say is: an abortion is normal, as the human. but there is another way of seeing things. and abortion is not the solution because beyond the body, each of us has a spirit created by God and for God. a spirit called to live forever and if you abort, you kill the body but the mind you can not kill him! and therefore the person does not disappear it is, she lives somewhere …. I am against abortion that is not the problem of adverse life that you want to delete, only Jesus Christ can solve.

Cons for the great majority of cases now in terms of conception during rape, God will judge (though he thinks the rapist but I think we should not get into illegality abortion).'s Case serious health ok (if really no other solution but if we know that his health does not allow it protects itself) there are alternatives to abortion and we know it is the law of the facility to choose abortion. there is the adoption can be a very good solution there are others that we have the courage to keep the child. even on a non-religious, the law of the facility . and I think many do not realize that the wounds it leaves. all the women I met who had an abortion, there are those who suffer for over 20 years. because subconsciously they know they have killed a life that was at the bottom of it I think we dare not measure all the consequences and to hell with the result. by cons, I would add that it is unacceptable d ' have an abortion rate also. By cons, I would add that it is unacceptable to have an abortion rate aussiélevé when you see all the defenses there: pill, condom, pill the next day, the kinds of clips, … mùaintenant if patient has been taking the pill you know you must be more attentive to our actions. is really to say abortion = easy. if everyone thought the other way especially in our country or we can afford to have fewer abortions @ chaouti: evidently even a cell is alive, so an embryo that is already composed of several cells is also a living cell. So yes, it is murder. @ the truth: do you know give your opinion without vulgarity? it also is the law of the ease of vulgarity. instead of developing arguments. How education … insult the other …

against the massacre of innocents, no votes on ……

WHEN 1 GIRL COLLAPSES C IS THE WORLD THAT SHE CRIES AS TUE MAY 1 ST, WHO WILL SAVE THE WORLD OR A GREAT ARTIST OR 1 LARGE WRITER ETC …. COLLAPSES C IS KILLING …….. A LEGALIZE MURDER BY THE STATE DOES NOT PAY FOR AID TO UNMARRIED MOTHERS, FATHERS WHEN TO THE SHARED RESPONSIBILITY IS CURSED AND THE MALE WILL HAVE ANSWER FOR cowardice AND THE MURDER OF LITTLE SOUL …… THE KARMA AND THE CLOCK BE HARD ….

against the wanton murder of little angels of the Lord ….

For! when is a health issue or rape!

Nobody is for abortion in the sense that nobody enjoys doing it, but the issue of choice of the pregnant woman who opposes the abortion ban. What is worse for a woman raising a child between a man who raped and killed an embryo? If you want my personal opinion I would be to legalize abortion until a certain stage of fetal development but prevent mass pregnant psychological damage that abortion can be very important. It is an act that takes a little too lightly in France, for example by not providing counseling to women who have abortions.

Question too intrusive for you to meet.

against

archi-cons … it is a crime!

Everything was against it is murder pure and simple.Aussi a policeman told me he saw little to be hiding when at the doctor was trying to draw with his instrument.

For. It is a good tool. And if it can t avoid 40 years of misery with a harpy who wants to have your money, your health, your children … better.

I'm for abortion rights, but not particularly "for abortion." Anyway it does not mean to be "for or against abortion" …

Cons! @ Jessica, I never really ASCERTAIN different methods of abortion so I say it is inhumane. You ca put at our disposal, and I hope that after having read that we reflect has twice before saying that abortion is not murder.

It's complicated … but only to escape its responsibilities I am cons …

Abortion kills 50 to 60 million children per year since the child feels warm and safe in the womb of his mother as a victim of this deadly assault? We can only imagine, because they'll never here to tell us about it. Most abortions occur within the first 12 weeks of life. At this stage, the tiny fetal breathing and swallowing. His heart beats. He moved his toes, clenched fists, turns liquid into his world … and feels pain. Many fetuses are torn stomach and sucked into a jar with a pipe after cutting. The process is called vacuum aspiration. The power of suction (29 times that of a domestic vacuum cleaner) tears the little body. Abortion by cervical dilatation and curettage is another approach: a knife-shaped loop scrapes the uterine lining, cutting the child in installments. For fetuses over 16 weeks [in countries where the law permits ], we use the abortion by injecting saline or. For fetuses over 16 weeks [in countries where permitted by law], we use the abortion by injecting saline ouempoisonnement by salt. Using a long needle piercing the amniotic sac to remove some amniotic fluid and replace it with a concentrated salt solution. While he eats and breathes, filling poison his fragile lungs, the child control and convulsing. Under the effect of the caustic solution, the skin burned, leaving the flesh raw and wilted. A cerebral hemorrhage can occur. Death, pain, occurs in a few hours, although sometimes, when work begins the next day, the woman gives birth to a baby alive, but dying. If the child is too developed to be killed by these methods or others like it is the solution of the hysterotomy, a caesarean section whose purpose is not to save lives, but to interrupt. We open the abdomen of the mother, and it almost always comes out a live baby. Some even cry. But we should let him die when we're not going to suffocate, drown or kill deliberately by some other means. After the. Bemoreeasilyreadon after these few lines, I hope you will cons …..