Posts Tagged ‘Morality’

The Vatican Has Already Made It Something More Than Human Decency Demand?

Tuesday, January 25th, 2011

atheist or believer, man does good, volunteered, did the charity … atheist or believer, man can hurt especially if he is also pushing an ideology by the Vatican before the modern era has waged war, promoted the antisemitism, scientific censorship, kill the apostates and heretics and other … al modern times, the Vatican supports his pope, works of charity and a speech on family planning, the abortion, sexuality that s opposite to that of practitioners, experts, … The Vatican promotes a simplistic view of sexuality and asked his priests to stifle any sex scandal without going through the police, under pain of excommunication (c finally was true a few years ago, today less in countries where the press is organized) the current Pope, the author of these rules, nya seen no problems up to what the media and secular organizations do quite a racket the church can still boast the slightest moral advance when it is packed with many problems?

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xbsqlj_babylone_webcam

In general, I noticed that the Vatican is quite traditionalist American Protestantism where a few steps ahead. This probably traditionalism that generates some of its problems and its inability to solve them. It will take however it finds a path to a configuration more suitable to modern society. Having said this traditionalism seems to avoid some fundamentalist religious sectarianism or maintaining separation from secular society in which it is "submitted" and that it does not "submit".

Why This Is He Commend Paul Council Important?

Friday, August 13th, 2010

he says (1 Corinthians 1:10) 10 Now I exhort you, brethren, by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, to have all the same language, and that there be no divisions among you, but you be united in the same mind and in the same opinion. if you were in the presence of Jesus, would you have the same language as him or challenge you some points? example we can be for abortion and be a Christian? or be Gay and being Christian? or Trinity and a Christian? @ Tartevel yes indeed everything is relative here it is the teaching of Jesus is in this lesson that must be united @ EDELWEISS you're wrong, Sylvain free, but if he goes he should not follow the demand that he must assume these personal choices

I found ca debile 'forcing people to all think the same thing. Long live the debate, long live democracy

I am always listening to my Popaul, that is why Satan inside me!

"In the same thought and the same view should be heard in all matters concerning the nature of belief in Jesus, not for any question. For then, uttering a little cap I confess all Christians should have the same tastes in all areas, the same hobbies, etc..

Regarding the latter point, I agree with you: we can be for abortion and be a Christian? Or being gay and being Christian? No, we can not approve such sins. Regarding this: Trinity and a Christian ? not agree at all to say that those who believe that God the Father, God the Son and God the Holy Spirit are not Christians! By cons, if you really want to serve the Lords, you will not say the written cons the Bible that Jesus is not God but an angel: Isaiah 9:6 For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government will rest on his shoulder will be called Wonderful Counselor, MIGHTY GOD , Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace. and that HE would be a force: John 15:26 When the Comforter is come, whom I will send to you from the Father, the Spirit of truth who proceeds from the Father he shall testify of me (and not a force of God) In this case, you are not real Christians, even if you want to be. Nay, you are dismissed. Moreover, you rejetéspar God, as it is written: Galatians 1:8 But when we ourselves, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel than the one we preached to you, let him be accursed! Galatians 1:9 As we said before, and I repeat at this time: if someone tells you a different gospel than the one you received, let him be accursed You really can not say that your religion is a religion of peace, since year-round you never announce the Gospel of Jesus Christ, but God (contrary to the Bible), and you do nothing but criticize other religions and harassment because of your religion because you Sylvain left! sm sm @ Gen: you know all the great respect I have for you, Amatoy, and others of your religion, although I disagree with your doctrine, for there religion and there are men. I do not throw the fish because the bones. Thus, with Sylvain, your co-religionists do not let him alone. And you say that Paul had written that n is. And you say that Paul would have written that n'estpas Christian if you believe in God the Father, God the Son and God the SE?! Give verses! Sm

Deity of Jesus, another pb, discuss the same texts and this is not the intent of the question! Otherwise, raises questions about these paasages polemiques1 You invited us to reflect on the works of a Christian OK, good, pursue that!

The advice of Paul I dislike the highest point. Misogynist, backward, macho and no respect for women, I see this apostle as a hateful person. Now, that Christians are for abortion, homosexuality, Trinity nobody's business. Everyone is free to think whatever he wants and if everyone thought the same thing as Paul asks, life would be very sad.

Peace my brother, peace! I learned respect. If we do not agree on one fundamental point (Trinity), we can still respect each other even if we disagree, is not it? "I believe in the Triune God, but I respect you even if you don is not of that opinion. Glory to God!

Why The Authorities Do Not Take Into Account The Opinion Of God To Ban Or Allow Abortion?

Tuesday, August 10th, 2010

Because god does not exist, simply

Virtual has found something new ………. a silly question to ask

Because the notice of God is unknown …. "God has spoken and never raised a seal of authenticity on an absolute revelation or a book …

They take into account for euthanasia or you can die in the worst suffering. They are hypocrites.

I just ask god if he was for abortion. He did not respond. And it's well known "Who says nothing consents." So God agrees to abortion. Moreover, it is logical for, as a result of history, in his infinite goodness he has a woman as a child who wanted to miscarriages.

Oh, you think someone has already spoken? I do not know if you realize, but we invented the sacred books into thinking that these books were written by the hand of God to ask why we do not ask God's opinion on abortion I seems a bit irrational. While we're at it, ask God why on earth is a mess and why he lets the men do that shit. And I hope he has a good excuse!

Because there are lots of different religions, because there are some non-believers, I do not see what right any particular religious ideology should apply to everyone including those who do not share. What would you think if, on behalf of my atheism, I prevented you from praying?

The authorities are elected by the majority, yet most men end up in hell (gate off Matthew 7:13), so why expect that those who were elected by the majority pay attention to God? .. .

Because the authorities are imbued with Marxism is to say human, earthly and devilish! All current chaos comes from Marxists because they specialize in bringing the confusion of values and stigma in the minds of simple! Sm

He does not answer the call or mail.

How Many People Die Earlier, Thanks To Religion?

Tuesday, August 3rd, 2010

Medical research and slow … condoms sex education criticized by the church … vaccines banned by Islamic groups in Africa or the Catholic church … churches youth killed by witchcraft … African anti-AIDS slowed. .. life ruined by a birth at the wrong time … women who die for having an illegal abortion women stoned for adultery … when their only crime was to have been violated in a Muslim country … it will last how many time? With more research, my life expectancy would be longer. With less self-righteous believers, fewer people would be dead ones in pain. Fewer people would think that it is not a real birth mother, if not in the pain. Less than doctors and nurses would let people give birth in pain or dying patients. The pain would be a priority for longer. The use of drugs would be more rational rather than irrational START a reaction among many believers.

Are you personally affected by this problem? It's weird, but it is not my impression. And besides, why: "thanks …" ?

People also die later because of religious beliefs. In pain, because their relatives or their doctors do not want to disconnect earlier. I'll have ca m afraid if happens to see me go to pieces, day after day, losing my limbs, my intelligence, gradually or not. I hope to have enough lucidity until the end in order to kill me quickly on the end.

If I remember correctly, Pasteur, for example, inventor of the vaccine against rabies, was a Catholic (famous anecdote of the rosary). It is not the condom, which is criticized by the Church that practices sex outside marriage. In a faithful couple, AIDS should not be a problem. Those who die early are those who have had risky behavior or pay the consequences of the behavior of their partner / parent. Put the blame on the back of the church is the true bad faith (literally and figuratively). To my knowledge, no vaccine is banned by the Catholic Church, but I'm open to discuss the examples that you could give. Life ruined by a birth at the wrong time: you probably referring to the ban on abortion by the Catholic Church. I do not see how that leads people to die earlier. Instead, it is abortion that terminates each year to millions of innocent lives. Women who die from illegal abortions, these women wanted. Women who die from unsafe abortion: the women themselves voulaientelles kill their own child. If they had not taken this decision to kill, they also live forever. The Christian religion says: Thou shalt not kill. The pain is just one specialty hospitals where Christians Palliative care units are often at the cutting edge compared to those who practice euthanasia and therefore shorten the life of the people (remember sure at first you say it was the fault of religion if more people were dying, now it is the fault of religion if they die later, must know …).

No one dies sooner or later through religion or another. It's very convenient for the gurus or others to do or suggest I just nonsense to say so. Apart from statistics, someone has already proved the contrary? What happens when a person is born the hour of his death is already registered. Nothing will disturb the countdown clock Celestial

Let's see … 3000 New York, 10000 per year in Afghanistan since 20 years, 202 in Bali, … Damn! I have not enough digits on my calculator …

"How many people die earlier, thanks to religion?" As far as those who live for their religion + all victims who are preferably people who do not like them. … What makes always "too".

Categories
Search
Bookmarks