the right to life, but yes ….

The FN is not a paradox.

You tell that to parents who have seen their kids screw up by being sick!

fn is the disposition of the mind

Death penalty for all the gauchos!

there is a difference between what the MLP said and what is written in are "program" – for the moment she said was not wanting to touch the abortion law but in the FN's program there is a paragraph on the unclear protection of life from conception to death – with a couple who would supposedly referrendum performs … I think the FN is definitely something against abortion but is not stupid as to say it now – c surprise for later lol say we are for the death penalty, c catchy especially recalling some facts Miscellaneous – be honest and say that in countries where it applies no less crime is much less. Justice has a duty to protect society not to allow the latter to satisfy his revenge. And c another debate.

c-sick habit of mixing all those who make the case for anti fn – and why a person who kill him is absolutely live – especially at our expense, the death penalty in heinous crimes I'm for – yet I'm not no party – when I'm al abortion but not against it should be at the expense of the person and not a whole society to pay

Yes and no, there is, in this political party, the idea appears to exclude those who hurt very badly in society and its members.

1 – In the anus, numerous live microorganisms that exist in that place and that their role is to contribute to the "decomposition" (I do not know if this is the appropriate term) of faeces (faeces = shit-sorry for this explanation, because I do not banish this term exists in the dictionary!) These microorganisms are found ONLY in the anus, this implies how much their presence in another place can be dangerous. So when a man enters his wife through the anus: a-these organisms can penetrate through the small hole (where he pees) and may cause him serious illness including impotence and the fact of not being fertile (this means that male fertility ans spermatozoon become unfit for the fertilization of the ovum of the woman). It becomes stréril! And that's not counting local infections and the poor wretch can not make love to his beloved because he bobo! b-after penetration into the anus, the man will surely make a small tour vagina, and that there can be dramatic. 2 – Around the anus is a sphincter muscle that works a bit automatically, by contraction-expansion, ie when you want to f ***, and we're sitting on the toilet it opens (it's psychological) but not when sitting still, it remains closed! Fortunately, because otherwise, imagine the damage! This is not a voluntary act I think it's a reflex action * (or it looks like him) is not made to receive something, iln'est not designed for anything! So when the man entered through that door! it extended to every muscle as it expands! And strength, the loss of muscle strength! As a result it fails to close completely over! Well imagine you there are people whose anal sphincter muscle does not contract any further! They are obliged to put diapers! This is not funny and plus it stink! Sources: My uncle, a professor of surgery, general medicine and infectious diseases

@ Manel Christiano, you doing what else in life besides thinking about ass?

Thank you for the info

That's why it should not go against nature

Fortunately I have never practiced it. It disgusts me already … There, you put the package!

Are you Doctor? .. I do not believe everything you just tell. waste "poop" are already prepared and stored in the small intestine. these wastes can not leave because the anus is sealed. an anus is closed premeditated by man, because being away from home, the man manages to keep up the house .. into the toilet. So the man contracts and relaxes the muscle volontairement.c is only the digestive juice and digestion which convert food waste. no anus. also gives your stem .. thank you!

Outside the very last point on which you approach that I have some doubts to have known cases that match what you describe, I would tend to refute your argument (not necessarily what you assert, but the consequences or deductions that you draw). 1) Some micro-organisms that exist there. Yes, unreservedly. 2) They may also become pathogenic. Yes. However, some environments are especially equipped for defense. 3) After [...] surely do a small tour vagina. It can. Or not. Personally, whenever I happened to go from back to front, I always made a detour to the bathroom before. No question, in fact, mixing the two. I even tried (with some success) to educate those of my friends that I knew "practitioners." Yeah, it cuts a little note, but when it's clear to both, it poses no real problem. 4) micro-organisms can enter through the meatus should be noted that one can wear a condom. 4) micro-organisms can enter through the meatus should be noted that one can wear a condom (in many cases it is strongly recommended). Apart from this solution, nature is still rather well done. Have you noticed how often, after an orgasm, want to have to go pee? This reaction is not psychological (as opposed to what one of my friends has long believed), nor the only result that prostate snaps into position "standard". It is an internal cleaning mechanism, which aims to remove the seeds eventually introduced into the urethra. This is useful for everyone since it can also nab the nasty microbes in the vagina. On the question of the anal sphincters is like all practices: enough is enough. A little exercise is good for health. Many sports that require attention. Too little sports seriously damaging and even killing. Same thing here. Any damage that you describe do exist, but they correspond to extreme practices and remain very marginal in relation to the total number of sodomites. Those who have. Desproblèmes those who are most often people who do not take basic precautions, or who have not been sufficiently attentive to their bodies. In summary, your post is unnecessarily alarmist and, in this form, untrue. Basically, as it is written, it looks like "smoking kills" on cigarette packages: "sodomy will make you sterile and incontinent" (you forgot "and send you straight to hell"). NO. The reality, as often is much more nuanced. Sodomy is a practice that requires care and vigilance. And which, I grant you, those who do not want should not be forced. As in all areas of love. No? ================================ @ Anna: Why? Did you find anything in the "life", more important or more interesting than the ass? ================================ @ Christiano: the reference to your source confirms what I thought. Your uncle, by the nature of its activity, is typically in the syndrome of "the tree that hides the. Your uncle, by the nature of its activity, is typically in the syndrome of "the tree that hides laforêt" sodomites the few who have problems come to see the multitude that goes do not contact, outcome, he sees only the minority. QED.

A link, a book title, anything, but a source please! I remain skeptical!

1 – In the anus, numerous live microorganisms that exist in that place and that their role is to contribute to the "decomposition" (I do not know if this is the appropriate term) of faeces (faeces = shit-sorry for this explanation, because I do not banish this term exists in the dictionary!) These microorganisms are found ONLY in the anus, this implies how much their presence in another place can be dangerous. So when a man enters his wife through the anus: a-these organisms can penetrate through the small hole (where he pees) and may cause him serious illness including impotence and the fact of not being fertile (this means that male fertility ans spermatozoon become unfit for the fertilization of the ovum of the woman). It becomes stréril! And that's not counting local infections and the poor wretch can not make love to his beloved because he bobo! b-after penetration into the anus, the man will surely make a small tour vagina, and that there can be dramatic. 2 – Around the anus is a sphincter muscle that works a bit automatically, by contraction-expansion, ie when you want to f ***, and we're sitting on the toilet it opens (it's psychological) but not when sitting still, it remains closed! Fortunately, because otherwise, imagine the damage! This is not a voluntary act I think it's a reflex action * (or it looks like him) is not made to receive something, iln'est not designed for anything! So when the man entered through that door! it extended to every muscle as it expands! And strength, the loss of muscle strength! As a result it fails to close completely over! Well imagine you there are people whose anal sphincter muscle does not contract any further! They are obliged to put diapers! This is not funny and plus it stink!

Super!

ahem! ok, I'll think banning sodomy in my life then! horrib is' what you say!

Yes, but it's so good …

should not be clairvoyant to think about what will happen in the spincter destroying them but you have to be perverse to practice sodomy with a woman (I do not speak of homosexuals is their problem

yes, it's a biology course with highly structured examples thank you

Finally, something sensible and intelligent to say in this topic. It is always wise to give such information to a lot of people who know nothing about this practice and fellatio and cunnilingus.

My dear, it is also practiced between two men … Anyway, thank you for the comment very unsavory, I would not die silly.

After these explanations will reflect the followers of this practice, I have to tell you, "VIVE LA Jobs."

FN you vote?

finally someone who does not trivialize sodomy as too many have tended to do today and thank you for detailed explanations as well mealtime it is not the most appetizing …

I stick no thumbs down, everyone is free to express themselves. @ Emile, context is French, actually in China, there are things questionable, especially when the child "unique" is a girl

no it's just people who do not fornicate while necessarily … @ Being the only one I still have a poucembas @ Lucas so fortunately you're not sanctimonious if not what it was …. but unlike some I can read without thumb down ME

he must have seen a fetus clinging to the walls of her amniotic sac to fight against the aspiration that will kill him to know (whether we like it or not) it's a murder is committed. After, do as you like, but knowingly

just narrow minds …

no they do not generally

No, not always.

I am an atheist but I believe abortion to be murder. Abortion should not be a means of contraception, as is the case too often. There are lots of ways to not having children.

Many opponents are against abortion because of possible abuses that it can cause. In China, for example, abortions are practiced almost exclusively on the female fetus and it will be after what? It has an abortion until we succeed in laying a toddler in blue eyes? @ Smart Who cares of context! I answered your question point to the line, the fact is that many opponents of abortion (which I do not belong by the way) oppose to prevent future abuses like those found currently in China .

I not attend this kind of character, should be asked directly to them

If I'm not mistaken. Simone Veil was Jewish. Was she once defined as an atheist? In France it may seem surprising that we can take a position as his religious beliefs. But, yes, a vast majority of believers are against abortion. This is not a cliché.

They are also often proponents of the death penalty because "we must not destroy a life given by God" … .

No I do not think so.

no you're in from all sides would admit my daughter to tell me I'd be the first to propose it I do not believe in religion as it is, be nice and not hurting around us, j got a certain number of kids you see but all wanted and not accidentally, it must be a horror to have an unwanted child and I admit that I want to be my grandma but my age Children who will decide, kiss my chip it is not copying machine as

Not all, but the drifts come across .. The anti-abortion religious merely doing what they believe to be good, but if they took the trouble to think, was a time for holy war was not she take the lives of some? Because it was for the good of god? So killing is not allowed in some cases but not to being in others is an unforgivable crime .. The debate would be too long anyway, and some stubborn spirits can never think for themselves ..

Opponents of abortion are people and / or associations, "partly believing, or acting under the influence of traditional social" conservatism "and religious doctrine." They advocate the "right to life" through the defense of the unborn, the disabled child to be born, and opposition to any form of euthanasia and human cloning. … Etc.. The right to life is the expression of a fundamental right that is rooted in tradition and religious precepts of the three monotheistic religions "thou shalt not kill." Religion is the primary motivation and / or source of action of the opponents of abortion. But opponents of abortion themselves are not necessarily all of those "religious" as you say-or near-religion, they rank among the most defenders of life (eg pacifists .. . etc.). I wish you a pleasant day.

Easy to be for or against when we are not concerned by the situation … At first, I am against abortion because I think it's a murder … (An unborn child is an innocent, a criminal is a pest that is why at the same time I'm for the death penalty …) In the case of unwanted pregnancy should be allowed to the mother that her future child is already in a position to be adopted by a family wanting a child ….. I had was a close friend of mine who has an abortion, and who now no longer able to have children regret that very much .. . On the other hand … I found myself "stuck" once with a friend who I had a few "intimate moments" but without wanting to plan a future together … it was a chance that a "false alarm" but I confess I have not slept for a few nights ….. Severe cases of conscience …..

hello everybody am pregnant a week I want to undergo a medical abortion is not my first abortion There's a lag of one year til there 's a risk how? 'm really lost

Bah quickly begins to see your doctor, it will be better advice than us!

A priori any particular risks. How? Make an appointment with the service "orthogenics" from the hospital or the nearest clinic, or see a gynecologist or go to family planning … etc. …

Apparently no risk … but 2 to 1 year apart (think of the pill or condoms!

I'm not against abortion myself I had suffered for 19 years but attention beyond the health aspect is something that could follow you all your life me today mom when I look at my children sometimes I sometimes think of what age would it seems to me to see her face! Think of Implanon (the arm) tranquil 3're three!! Kisses courage

Thank you for the courage of your convictions.

… Upstream, it is absolutely necessary that the pill is free for teens …

Too permissive, but they must see each particular case.

The law seems fair. I say that I am neither for nor against. Just for the free choice of women! 1) By cons, it is time to empower boys (men) leave the responsibility for contraception to girls (women). Above all, do bear financially, morally and physically that some children to make their partner before dropping them after the revelation of the pregnancy. This is what happens in the Scandinavian countries that have little or no help to women with "the single parent allowance. Taxpayers do not pay for the irresponsible! 2) We need more family planning to help women in their choice of contraception and / or decision to make regarding abortion. Thus, a number largest hospitals agreeing to perform IGV. Past 20th years, women's rights regress .. and everybody can not afford to get abortions abroad.

I am fundamentally against abortion, with exceptions. Disease-Rape-fetus or pregnant person, risk fatal childbirth-The age of the person (10-12 years is ineligible for example! )-inbreeding short, I sincerely believe that there are abuses on this side! It should not be allowed for example the abortion of a woman who already has undergone several "Well, that remains my opinion, I do not judge women who have had or will use it.

Much too permissive. I do not judge women in distress who are forced to resort to abortion. But I saw around me too many abortions merely correcting an oversight pill! The wife of a CEO who has made abortion for unwanted pregnancy and too late (in fact not a true "abortion", a Fause layer caused by Medoc given by his doctor). But I have seen women have abortions four or five times. It was their method of contraception! In cases like this, I found that tubal ligation should be mandatory.

abortion should be avoided where possible through greater prevention among young girls by giving them mpyens of contraception as recommended by Ms. Royal, who is often right on such subjects!

a woman who has miscarried five times can still birth?

if it is medically no problems but instead of aborting it 5 times better if she would not take the pill or put an IUD? it's so easy!

Abortion is a heinous act. A woman who aborts 5 times does not deserve to have a child one day!

How a woman can have an abortion 5x today, it does not deserve to become a mother.

Normally yes, she can bear children.

In theory yes, in practice, even with medical abortions performed, the uterus has a very high chance of being damaged (adhesions, placenta previa, etc.) which increases the risk of miscarriage, poor infant feeding, d hemorrhage etc..

5 times, it's still huge, with every means of contraception available. Now, it is difficult to answer you, sometimes there can be complications.

from that at the origin of life should influence our own? Acts 17:28

"There will be in your country or miscarrying or barren. I will fulfill the number of thy days." Exodus 23-26

In Islam it is strictly haram and forbids abortion. It is God who creates, God is God who kills and takes what he has created.

The life of a human being is sacred. In Islam, abortion is banned except for exceptional cases (risk of death of the mother for example). "… Did not destroy the life that God has made sacred …" (Surat Al-Isra – verse 17) "Whoever kills a man not guilty of murder or a crime on earth is as if he slew all men. And anyone who donates to a man's life is as if he saved the lives of all hommesé (Surah Al-Mai'dah – verse 32).

God does not think: God does not exist. And I think it is better to abort if the woman feels unable to bear. There are already enough unhappy on earth like this! (Reminder: a billion people hungry worldwide, while the West die of obesity …)

The "abortion is taking life a little human being!

The Catholic religion forbids course abortion is a crime like any other. It involves deleting a human being, not some ordinary cells!

I think that abortion, whether you are for or against a personal capacity, is most often an ordeal for the woman undergoing the procedure and there are cases where I can understand that. I do not know what God thinks about this but I know He is the only one to know the reason for the person undergoing the procedure.

Bonsoir, He will ask those who are "against abortion" that can make a child, a girl who was raped at age 15 for example, what will she do with her life if she is obliged to keep a child? Just because a monster has raped, she is obliged to keep the result? Nice … And as for the woman, too poor or too busy, too sick, or not ready, what would she do? These are just two examples among many others. We must stop being silly and accept that a woman does what she wants with her body.

Nobody can boast the savoir.Des men, self-proclaimed messenger of God, have decreed that it was contre.Poses him the question, surprised he answered.

@ V for Vendetta: and the baby? You think about the baby? He too can say: "My life is ruined because a monster has violated one that IS my mother, and because of him, because I was not born of a normal father, I never see the day I never see the face of that which is my mother! "These women, these very young women who have suffered the horror of rape, and who agreed to keep their children out of love are heroes, worthy women the greatest respect! Even a child of 15 who becomes a mother is quite able to care for her child without her life is ruined. She will always help, and most importantly, it will find the strength and courage to deal with this little creature. What does God think about abortion? God gives us life, He who allows a child to be born. We have no right to go against His will.

hello I think God is against abortion because we do not have the right to take a life. For the critics I say, if the woman does not desire the child for many reasons (rape, etc. .. Disclaimer .) has the solution "to adopt her child" (anonymous childbirth) many infertile couples would be happy to adopt a child he would still relax laws on adoption big kisses

God condemns abortion there is nothing to complain about.

Since God created innocent human life and created man in His image, we have no right or authority to take innocent human life – including that of an unborn child. Moreover, since it is the breath of God that gave man his eternal soul, not the air land, we can deduce that a child not yet born who lives in the womb "breathes" in the plane of God and therefore, has an eternal soul that should not be affected by us. Since God sees that life is a blessing and a curse is death, abortion should be considered a work cursed. Furthermore, God clearly instructs us to choose life when we face a choice between life and death. When this option to maintain or achieve the life of her child is presented to a mother, she should choose life!

For God, the life of a child in the early stages of its development, just after conception, has the same value thereafter Ps 139:13-16: "Thou hast given shelter in the womb. Your eyes saw my embryo, and in thy book were written all its parts."

here, I want to join a party, but I do not know which one. if I left, I do not know which party is closest to my values, which are: economic and social – I think we should go to a distribution of wealth. – I also think that taxes should be widely proportional to wealth, and that welfare should be increased. Higher taxes on the rich could also suppress the coffers of the state, and save the pensions. I think the state should ensure that every human being French or not, should be able to live decently immigration: "I think that immigration is a chance for France, and that we should help foreigners to integrate in France. – I am voting for foreigners – I'm against evictions Justice: – I think justice should, instead of simply punishing a malefactor to help "get into the right path" Abortion: – I sui for abortion Euthanasia: I. – I am voting for foreigners – I'm against evictions Justice: – I think justice should, instead of simply punishing a malefactor to help "get into the right path" Abortion: – I sui for abortion Euthanasia: Euthanasia-jesuis for homosexuality: "I'm for gay marriage Elections-as seen above, I am voting for foreigners – I'm partial to a proportionality to the Assembly – I'm for electing the president by universal suffrage – I'm against the local government reform. Values French: I'm for the preservation of traditional French (regional languages), but I do not squeezed against the multiculturalism of France's Ecology: – I think the ecology right to be a priority. thank you in advance. @ scotia free outside the English: for euthanasia, I think she should be able to lieuxque if the person given his agreement. @ Death: thee read my thoughts?

the ump! yes yes !!!!!!… especially the ump does not listen Athena di Provence if you answered !!……….!!!!!!!.

I advise you to join the National Front with Navy in 2011 and President in 2012 VIVE LE FRONT NATIONAL VIVE LA FRANCE LIBRE DOWN THE nazislamism

It is up to you to decide. As a vote in the ballot box. The only thing is to remain respectful to the people of the other side while being able to express your opinions.

On the left, for sure. Pretty good test, even if it is only a tool: http://www.politest.fr/

Pffff this is more of a party you should join. for abortion, euthanasia, same-sex marriage there I think you can not go lower. It may be stupid but true. Is it moral to destroy the lives of people saying it's normal anyway it has become vegetables? the only ones who benefit from it is the hospitals! Plus it's not even the ones they choose vegetables that have become their kids. And how many kids in the world want their parents or do not care! Abortion: Is it normal under the pretext of "my body is mine"? Not your body belongs to you but we can not to do anything else I can say "my house is mine" and kill 100 000 people there! homosexual marriage: Can you imagine gay marriages in 876 or 1876?

You have time to lose the Ump!

extreme left.

one whose vision of society is better

Voting is no longer anything because of the manipulation of public opinion through the media.

Here is information that once again does not make media headlines aligned or websites pseudo-alternative (usually disguised branch of the media aligned). Yet the subject is important because it concerns just the conscience clause in the medical field, which could soon be abolished at EU level course. Video archive March 2009 (VO English): Just like Europe, the president Oabama is also under pressure from forces neo -globalists attempt to destroy the conscience clause in the U.S. – Youtube A call to action and an online petition is available on the Internet: "European Call Save conscientious objection on 7 October 2010, the Parliamentary Assembly of Council of Europe, will discuss and submit to a vote a resolution to "regulate the right to conscientious objection" in the medical field. "An official list of the objectors will be introduced, opening the door to bullying and.> An official list of the objectors will be introduced, opening the door to bullying etdiscriminations professional. "More importantly, caregivers will be forced to work" emergency "to their conscience condemns acts: abortion, sterilization, euthanasia … Defending freedom of conscience! The vote on October 7 depends on our efforts. Take note of the draft resolution immediately sign the Appeal online. Http://www.adv.org>> This is obviously a step towards the Unification of World by the neo-globalist elites widely represented in Brussels! Freedom of conscience is a fundamental freedom that the fanatics of the New World Order (both right Goch) dream to trample forever … Not only is this clause consciousness is fundamental, but it must also be extended to vaccination, which of course the opposite objective of the elite. Please note that Europe is not the only continent where this clause of historical consciousness is questioned, since President Obama is also. Please note that Europe is not the only continent where this clause of historical consciousness is questioned, since it is President Obama aussisous pressure to "reform" (read destroy) this clause fundamental individual right. But as always at each one to form their own opinion, and sign the petition … or not. link VO: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=48QP_ATmjtg&feature=player_embedded

yeah bombing of family planning, murder of a doctor performing abortions, bonfire of the contraceptive pill and condom program too cool your stuff … and AC criticizes Muslim extremists … long live the prolife …

"But as always to every one to form their own opinion, and sign the petition … or not." Well then this is or not. If your doctor has a case of conscience to do his job, he converted.