While My question is to appear provocative but not meant to shock: since Jesus said that "many are called but few are chosen" (Matthew 22:14) (Act of predestination for access Heaven or Hell cited in other biblical passages which Apocalypse 3.5 "whose names were not written from the foundation of the world in the book of life") is that mothers who have abortions do not involuntary service for babies, (according to the Christian perspective which holds that eternal soul exists at conception the fetus) because they will not know ever on earth or physical or mental suffering and even have the chance to be directly received in paradise without going through the earth and its constraints, and they do not have to choose between good and evil and have never had the opportunity to commit the sins including one who was appointed by Jesus "unforgivable ? Even if abortion is considered murder, to paraphrase a verse from Ecclesiastes a

The end does not justify the means. If I kill someone out of a confessional one could also say that I committed a good deed by sending the repentant sinner directly to heaven before he falls back into its habitual sins. Also Nothing says that children who die without baptism go to heaven. Is it fair that they do not suffer in hell, they do not necessarily enjoy the beatific vision.

as Jesus said (Matthew 12:32) [...] but whoever speaks against the Holy Spirit, it will not be forgiven him, no, neither in this system of things in it or who is coming . it is for God to resurrect the fetus but that does not guarantee they are not fishing against the spirit of the devil did not need to be on earth to fish rather than to endure the suffering of this world more likely to understand what evil is and reject it forever because he will have experienced

According to TJ, the soul is mortal. "When we die we know anything." Abortion is an unnatural end, provoked and decided. The end of an unborn life. "Thou shalt not kill" is one of the first commandments. Murder is murder, no matter when it occurs. Personally, I think that even if the abortion is happier, which is not certain, however, the woman who was not happy with her gesture. She lives with a bad conscience and a trauma for a hell of a time.

If religion took over the unfortunate, the abortion issue would not arise. The issue arises when the child is born of rape, incest or the accident. In these cases, it is not desired. Whether it is the biblical or evangelical, they have been written by men. The Gospels do not even say inspired by God's Word live (which could be expected already at the time put into question the Bible written without ink or paper therefore memory, a type remained perched talk with God for 2 years without eating or drinking). Jesus never asked the celibacy of priests, for example, and yet it is an accepted dogma. It has harmed the Catholic Church since pedophilia is linked to this practice. That said, the West prohibits child marriage. Other countries have adopted other laws where the young child can be married against her will at any adult male. It is obvious that I do not answer your question because being for abortion is in itself a negation of. Obviously I do not answer your question because being for abortion is in itself a negation of woman and I am therefore for the practice. Birth to a child without the means to make him happy is criminal. Those that prohibit abortion must take their theories and ensure the happiness of the unborn. I am sure that the number of abortions would decrease significantly if the critics offered a credible response. Ban is to give equal opportunities to all. Forbid you to steal me because am forbidden to steal for the social life is possible. Abortion is an individual story because the woman is left alone with his burden, yet the child has a father! One who is born without an earthly father called Jesus and he is in heaven now, to the right of God, what is more!

Rather complicated question. I do not want to write a novel so I'd very short. The issue of abortion in my opinion is a matter of interpretation of the Bible and morality. unless I am not aware (I agree to be guided). Because the breath of life is received when? before or after birth? Life is physiologic for a fetus, not spiritual. And thus the soul that would integrate the human in his first breath (at birth), will simply go elsewhere, or just wait it will not. I think interpretation of life, the correlation between the spiritual and physiological in humans are too late or will never be known for that man can debate about this is two completely different logic and it will not discuss with human logic. So, from this perspective for me the mothers who have abortions do not render involuntary service to anyone. I remember that I am a Catholic and against abortion, but not dramatically, and for reasons of morality.

Would you say that you are unhappy to exist on Earth and had been better than your mother avortât you? I do not think we should implement your reasoning on another person for an answer. See for yourself. You can always correct the mistake made by your mother giving you birth. For the rest, everyone is predestined to choose the side with or without God. The Lord said: "Is what I want the death of sinner course not, but he changes lanes and live. "This is eternal life or death = where their worm does not die … dixit Jesus.

Not being a believer I believe simply that abortion is a step forward for women and it would be criminal to jeopardize …

I think it has always existed and will always exist and that it is a very good thing that it is framed and conducted in good conditions.

What everyone does as he pleases. The important thing is that they seem to exist and that it is medically supervised. Each of his choices

I'm for, but in some cases such as pregnancy due to rape or the fetus with disabilities. But for the young girls of sixteen who have sex at any cost, never protect themselves and undergoing two abortions per year, I am absolutely against, they take their responsibilities!

For me it is a very serious crime, desperately on a soul without protection is VIL

I think we need to be adopted hypocrite! tjs abortion has existed from all time! but before this was done in very poor conditions dns! A therefore been introduced to legalize abortion! I'm FOR!

I think it may help some people, and it is great! While some abused sometimes, but thank you simone veil!

im told if this happiness is you I t formally forbid you to abort a baby c is a gift from god you ôtes aborting you destroy someone's life one and if you get pregnant before the age does not make you miscarry and if you get pregnant do not say that he does are a misfortune happens the baby is not evil if you think your mother was thinking you would do with us to ask ourselves this question never makes a mistake so you know what I am youngest in my family my mother had had 44 years my father said to have an abortion because she was too sleep and my mother already had children and now you know what I am their hope you never know what your child will never do and neither will ever think this may be the last age without children is not a life do you think this Dalida commit suicide if she had any children I do not think it would continue to live for them I would be good im still available if t Another issue in ad

Since you are pro-abortion, your parents should have aborted you!

Well, Twat. I am neither pro-abortion or anti. What a woman wants to make her stomach is not mine and not to YOU to decide. Occcupes up your ass.

Strange behavior

Perhaps it is better not to have been rather than having had a rough life …

But my parents wanted a child, head of con! Nobody wants to make abortion mandatory ….

You do not even know what an abortion potato. A true abortion, not a propaganda film obscurantist.

we entrust you all children of abortion = Vrait you tell us your impression in a year ok

Catholics are against abortion, but when a girl is pregnant at 14 years as a result of rape, he is thinking!

When you see the bunch of idiots who roam the earth, I wonder if you have no reason for me … I am for the right of women to control their bodies and their lives … 1'Um1

Here, you have included: being pro-abortion means trying to force all pregnant women to abort. It is curious, the term "con as an oyster" comes suddenly to mind …

These are not parents who have abortions, but only women. For my part, I am happy to be wanted and I thank my mother. And yours, of mother she regrets?

One may prefer to have a nation of weak http://www.consang.net/index.php/Global_prevalence

Hi, oyster!

Everyone has a brain, is not to say that people like you use it. It's the same here, not because all women have the right to do what they want their body (it does not concern you), including abortion, they abort for each child.

In all cases your parents to you, they should not be "pro-avortment "…. shame.

Ah ah ah ah ah … you have almost succeeded, I was on the verge of choking with laughter about this issue.

Great argument … away as others?