I dream that I was breastfeeding my niece's son who is 1 year. He laughed and was very much pleased by sucking

and what is the question yacine tell me?

but it all say it's fantastic to see, and the question is??

I realized she still had fleas, so I wash it and treat it so it does not there is any danger to the kittens but I still have a hesitation, is that it could be harmful for small?

I put a star for my contacts see your question .. but my opinion does not wet too!

In my opinion no but honestly I'm not sure of myself (I advise you to call the vet to be sure of the answer because life depends on kittens). I hope others will respond to you being totally sure of themselves ….

before I ask the vet as kittens may lick the product.

Bjr, I think it is not recommended, but it is best to ask the vet. cdlt

Too much conflicting info on the forums, not taking any chances, call the vet … Keep us updated of her answer, it will interest all those (including me) who could not get any reply.

I do not know you have to read the package insert! normally do not wash their cats, why? they wash alone licking!

Request advice veto. The kittens will be flooded with chips and turn the house too.

Hello Xenia B, Do not wash your cat! You can treat it with its little kittens against fleas. There are products that can be put at birth for example, "Frontline" spray! Do not let your cats fleas invaded, you'll soon have your home infested with its bugs! Treat first the mother and the kittens, board, or spray directly by the product on them, because they are very young, put the product on soft gloves you put on them by stroking them! Reapply every 2 days! Then we must deal simultaneously throughout your home, baskets, cushions, carpet, because it will be soon a vicious cycle! If your cats are infested with fleas, go see a vet! Good day.

I do not think there is any indication cons

Agnes is not treated against fleas kittens before the age of 8 weeks! is marked on the products …. especially do not wash a cat nursing kittens to spot because the smell of the mother (and particulèrement their favorite pacifier), they are blind and deaf to at least 3 weeks, so do not tempt the devil. The only product safe for a cat allaittante and grandchildren is to give the big cat program (the vet), a product that sterilizes fleas. These "adorable" little critters from mother to young and vice versa will all be sterilized by this means. When babies have one month, there are always chips, you can give them a bath of clean, warm water with 2 drops maximum lavender essential oil and treat also the place where they sleep with mom and all cushions, curtains, carpets, etc. from home with 5 drops of lavender essential oil, dissolved in a little oil or sweet almond bath, and diluted in a spray bottle.

I leave my second trimester ultrasound and malformations was detected at the lip of my baby … I gotta go see a specialist to find out if a cleft palate or cleft lip simply, but I could not get an appointment on 5 May! So more than three weeks to wait: S Until then, I wanted to know in one case as in the other age at which an operation can be considered? And then I understood that I could not breastfeed (that I really wanted to do …). Is it valid in 2 cases or just in the case of a cleft palate? Finally is it possible to bottle the milk collected in the breast pump and continuously from the beginning, or is it that this only applies to nursing mothers "normally" in "Troubleshooting" … ? Thank you in advance for your answers! I ask all the questions to the specialist, but I can not wait 3 weeks without knowing anything …

http://www.doctissimo.fr/html/sante/encyclopedie/sa_1126_malform_visag.htm http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fente_labiale I found these two links … may be that will help you … I am sorry that this defect affects your baby and I hope you find the answers you want. Good luck

I wonder what country are you in for an appointment for a long time. I do not need to tell you that surgery maxillo facial surgery has made tremendous progress Do not get too much bad blood, it can affect your pregnancy. That first you give birth normally, so that the baby of your womb and into life all your questions answered. Good luck and long life to the baby

I find it really sad to tell parents that their baby has a problem and let them go into the wild without any information, reeling from the announcement alone with their questions and anxieties. Shame to have to wait 3 weeks to see a specialist … In the meantime, perhaps you should meet with your GP who can answer some of your questions. On your side, try not too worried, I know that's easier said than done, but stress it is not very good either for baby or for you … The age at which a transaction may be considered depending on the deformity and the surgeon, it can go from birth to 18 months (this is not an age limit). On breastfeeding, nothing is lost. Everything is possible with willpower and courage. These babies are harder to feed than others, but it is both valid in that bottle … I'll put on some links related to breastfeeding:. I'll put on some links related to breastfeeding: http://allaiter.free.fr/presse/fente.html http://www.lllfrance.org/chercher.html?q=fente+palatine Get informed and you'll see in time what you can really do, there are so many factors that fall in. A forum: http://fente-labio-palatine.forumactif.com/ Good luck!

Sorry, I can not answer your main question about the age of an operation. But I think it is very young. Avoid maybe (but probably too late) sites that talk about it, because the images will shock you, whereas with YOUR child there will be a commitment. This changes everything. No doubt further investigations will be made to check the "spina bifida". But it is very rare, reassure yourself. This is due to a lack of folic acid. For cons, the milk given to the breast pump, two advice: – First, never gives him (Oh, ever) milk that you shot with a conventional bottle (nipple) or he loses the sucking reflex (c is almost immediate for most children) and can not breastfeed after the operation. There are special bottles in stores brand medela (also get information from La Leche League-) with no dummy, but a kind of pouring spout. It rules. – Secondly, it will have you pull your milk very. – Secondly, it will have you pull your milk so trèsimportante, so as not to lower your "production" because in this breast pump head softer than a baby. Or "more feeding is more important there will be milk." So many do not hesitate to use the breast pump, even in the freezer. There are all the hardware in the trademark "medela" (the best in my opinion), milk-derived highly efficient, freezer bags, bottle-cup, etc.. Breast pumps are reimbursed. There. Now you too-wary physicians' anti-breastfeeding "who advise too easy to drop in case of complications. Take more notice! Good luck, and you'll see, the strength of the attachment is fabulous and crosses many barriers.

Breastfeeding is possible http://www.lllfrance.org/Feuillets-pour-les-professionnels-de-sante/Lallaitement-dun-bebe-presentant-une-fente-labiale-et/ou-palatine.html?q cleft lip + = Depending on the severity of the malformation, it will be more complicated but not impossible. The article by La Leche League meets over all the questions you ask yourself. Good luck.

one doctor or gynecologist can answer you

The answer depends on the place: – in poor countries without access to milk or no industrial water system to reconstitute milk: breast feeding permit. In these circumstances, either the mother is on ART and HIV transmission through breast milk is a negligible risk from complications of stopping breastfeeding … either it is not on antiretrovirals and anyway the risk of transmission in utero or during birth is much, much higher than that associated with breastfeeding – in industrialized countries: breastfeeding not recommended because of risk of transmission through milk, non-zero even under antiretroviral

the doctor aurra the answer but from what I understand yes (with medication required)

Interesting question, I found this page on Act Up Paris all risk of MTCT. Their expertise in HIV is recognized. In summary, they recommend rather the bottle, the risk of HIV transmission through breastfeeding is 10-15%. HIV-positive mothers should be monitored and receive specific antiretroviral therapies. In some cases it is recommended cesarean delivery, birth by vaginal delivery (natural) is highly contaminating.

oh no it's not dangerous … but if you want to redo thee butcher's guts, it's a good idea not to take birth control … (It annoys me, but it annoys the irresponsible)

actually it is very dangerous because you have sex does not only sets a new design (pregnant again) but there are risks of infectious diseases so watch out if you want your health

This is not dangerous but totally irresponsible. It is still not that hard to take a contraceptive, especially since it is a choice .. However abortion is not one. Even if you can not keep a baby that you do not want, this does not prevent you from nab disease. We still live in a society where it is readily available means of contraception. Before sleeping with anyone, anytime, you would have done better to go to school to learn to write.

I read you saying "once it did not suffice him" …

poor idiot who does not understand life

well yes … Moreover, it is risky at any time ….

unprotected? seriously? You tfais abortion and you do that again unprotected sex? Y'as something wrong with you?

An abortion is not nothing! It's become a life as you stop. Obviously for you it was not an accident but the bullshit! I hate you?

Dangerous I do not know, rather unconscious, right?

dangerous not so irresponsible. Abortion is not contraception!!

Troll

After abortion or not, Having unprotected sex is ALWAYS IRRESPONSIBLE AND SOMEWHAT DANGEROUS!

yes, because you risk having a baby troll … or otherwise, you'll have an abortion again, and this can make you sterile, and you can not have babies anymore trolls.

Dangerous in what sense? Being pregnant, having a child (something wonderful): that's the danger? It was not the same concept of danger, but if that's the danger for you: yes, you're in danger! That's okay, it will only the second time that precede the next time and so on … What unconsciousness! What crap! Next time think a bit (if you can, if it's something you can do)!

This question is for all those who misuse religion, pro-Islamic Sharia, pro-burka, all-halal, but also to other believers as extremists cathos anti-abortion and anti-gay or I do not know what to another. We are in a secular country, is being faithful to your honor, I myself believe, but to some, stop imposing your ideas and ways of life to others.

But the ones you describe are perfectly understood that France is secular, and that is what they can not stand and fight with all their forces.Je am very proud that advance social and political my country, even if nothing is ever perfect, a country that keeps centuries ahead of others, though not behind other plans

Oh some in France want to impose the religion of "do what you want" sex .. drugs … alcohol and acceptance of homosexuality I said no!

I totally agree with is that you say, all the extremists of all outside edge is about having the butter and butter money. they are not open to others what is normally the basis of religion, they are racist, not tolerate, that are judging others, look in the attitude of the other etc. ..

I do not see the link between abortion and secularism

There is no denying that pregnant women are at great risk and sometimes that because of their poor health, such as diabetes, hypertension or cardiovascular disease, doctors genuinely concerned may conclude that their lives are in danger. They may say to a pregnant woman: "If you miscarried not, you die." They can also recommend an abortion because they believe the child may be born blind or malformed, perhaps because the mother contracted rubella during her pregnancy. Some think that in such cases a woman who aborts her reality shows that respects life. Without minimizing the seriousness of the problem or question the sincerity of those who advocate abortion, it should nevertheless think of two lives: that of mother and child. But life and respect it is considered fundamental in the Bible. What do you think?

I think the religious have nothing to do with it. This is the woman alone to make that decision, it is his body, his child, his life. Although I am personally strongly against abortion, I leave to each his own responsibility, without judging and without blaming anyone. And certainly not by relying on religious precepts or the Bible. It is our conscience that we make our decisions, each one personally.

I'll just answer from my own experience. I have a uterine malformation, doctors' verdict: you can not carry a pregnancy beyond six months and very little chace would do to have a viable premature. Result: I have two children born at term of fifteen days, in perfect health, who have not spent a single second in an incubator. Basically if I had listened to doctors, who supposedly know everything and told me to drop? Bah I will not have any children.

as a Doctor told me, what matters is the age of the mother and DNA testing by karyotypes has queqhes months before birth. because he has a child with Down syndrome 2 times unlucky one is disabled 2) his parents abandoned him it is important to know the risks to abort as soon as possible

If it should happen to me .. I will in no way a avortement.La life is precious to God from our conception.Je like to give my child a chance to live the dangerous new world as God promet.C is on that modern life is not easy but we must think what we will après.Ce can help us better reflect on our choix.Avorter (for me) is a meurtre.C east killed a LIFE. This is not parcqu'il is in our body that we all have rights dessu … it is a risk of being normal or not it's still a life.

"We must nevertheless think of two lives: that of mother and child." Nice sentence … But a little silly. You know the lives of people with high disability? You know the lives of these kids dying because they are suffering from a genetic disease? … I do not think so … Spend his entire life in a wheelchair drooling, screaming … This is not a life. Abortion is not a selfish act, it can be a gesture of compassion, as with suicide (for those suffering at the end of life) may be one. Moreover, abortion is permitted only during the early stages of training, so it's not a life that is killed is a schematic life one does not lead to an end.

I think you astray a bit, there is confusion in your words, and to answer your question if a woman's life is in real danger, so it justifies an abortion, because to get your ideas and biblical respect for life, that a woman can die in continuing the pregnancy and was equivalent to suicide (suicide is forbidden in all religions!) at least I see things like that n and also the risk that neither the mother nor child surviving. after in respect of non-fatal diseases (or might not be able to have a normal pregnancy) of the mother is on a case by case, but the risk returns to play Russian roulette I joined @ KI in its response ( except for the conclusion!) @ topaz, how can they called a murder a trend?

Nothing justifies abortion. We must stop this kind of consideration hypocritical. What is abortion for health reasons, because we do not want this baby, because he comes from a rape, because you are too young to keep …. The result is identical in all cases. It is therefore unnecessary to have to justify his intentions when making this decision, abortion is neither more nor less "evil" than another. That is why abortion should be a right granted to all and not to some that we have chosen arbitrarily. If believers have always been concerns the respect for life because it is a biblical fundamentals. There would be many deaths that would have been avoided. So can I care what may well tell an old book that you open when it suits in some.

yes, if theres no alternative

One can be against abortion but allow others (each woman) decide on his conscience. A decision to abort is already painful enough in itself to crush him in remorse over moral or religious.

From experience, children born with disabilities and physical disabilities especially mental (eg T21), are quickly abandoned or placed in homes with loving parents and very Catholic. Now, given your other questions that question feels a little proselytizing for our friends of Jehovah's Witnesses)

Hello Did you know that the abortion is performed a bit less than 51 times a day in Belgium in 2009, but to be precise 18,595 women have received abortions in 2009. The 99% of abortions are performed because the child is unwanted, is there not enough contraceptives to avoid falling in speaker. Now the biblical perspective, every abortion is murder. Reread Psalm 127:3 "Behold, the son are a heritage from the LORD, The fruit of the womb is a reward." (NASB). Think about it Most abortions occur within the first 12 weeks of life. At this stage, the tiny fetal breathing and swallowing. His heart beats. It moves the toes, clenched fists, turns liquid into her world … and feels pain. Many fetuses are torn from the womb and sucked into a jar through a tube after cutting. The process is called vacuum aspiration. The power of suction (29 times that of a household vacuum) tears the little body. Abortion by dilation. Abortion by dilation and curettage Ducol is another method: a loop-shaped knife scrapes the uterine lining, cutting the child into slices. For fetuses over 16 weeks [in countries where permitted by law], we employs abortion by injection of saline, or salt poisoning. Using a long needle is pierced the amniotic sac to remove some amniotic fluid and replace it with a concentrated salt solution. While he eats and breathes, filling his fragile lungs with poison, the child control and convulsing. Under the effect of the caustic solution, the epidermis, burned, leaving the flesh raw and wilted. A cerebral hemorrhage can occur. Death, pain, occurs in a few hours although sometimes, when work begins the next day, the woman gives birth to a baby alive, but dying. If the child is too developed to be killed by these methods or other, similar, it remains the solution of the hysterotomy, a cesarean section whose purpose is not to save life, but. If the child is too developed to be killed by these methods or other, similar, it remains the solution of the hysterotomy, a cesarean section whose purpose is not to save lives, but del'interrompre. We open the abdomen of the mother, and it almost always comes out a live baby. Some even cry. But we should let it die when you're not going to choke him, drown him or kill him deliberately by any other means. Hello @ Topaz I would not put a link showing an abortion, but if you work in a hospital middle you know very well what an abortion. And do not think I said tell stories but here is one, it is called Today my mother killed my http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q00i-JkWbBM&feature=related You talk of blood and Witnesses Jehovah, but if a day in Belgium doctors kill 18,595 children in France, the future is even higher numbers 5 See 6 times, it is something other than suicide of Jehovah's Witnesses (because of blood)

I just do not answer but only to comment on the response of @ Amaytois. My dear friend. If you'd like me worked in hospitals for almost 25 years you would have learned that your descriptions are just morbid pro-life propaganda. It is in some sense, a terrorist event which tends to discourage you do not agree. In other words, you are yucky … Because of the bloody stories as you describe them, I could tell you because I've experienced. They consernent especially TJ. Suicides refused transfusions, it tells you something?

Abortion is a right decision in France is always terrible to take

The response Amaytois is very hard but unfortunately it's true, there are many sites on the Internet where you can see the sad truth. Where you can see ultrasound pictures of fetus week by week, and also actual images of abortions that are unbearable for me. So do you sail @ Topaz's face. A fetus at 12 weeks it already looks like a tiny human, and in some countries abortion is allowed till 24 weeks! The fetus is a living and he suffers. Especially when we know the ways of all abortions that are really horrible. Some fetuses (especially for those in some cases removed by caesarean section) did not die during the abortion, but after this one, yes it sometimes happens that they are still alive and dying after abortion. It's HORRIBLE. Some people should be more responsible when the pill and forget … For children who will be born ill-formed, it is true that it's delicate, an understandable dilemma, or to. For children who will be born ill-formed, it is true that it's delicate dilemma understandably pourdes or children born of rape can understand it psychologically hard for a woman to live. You can see things from different angles, but for my part, I am against abortion. Especially since most are of a forgotten pill, or other irresponsible. I just saw this video that was posted Amaytois, I cried …

For God, life is sacred''Thou shalt not kill''

Sitting on a sofa but some do but look up this link.

Ah, the Middle Ages, what holy days: no abortions, no marriages between men, and especially the presence of Charles Martel … Oh, there considered as epileptics owned, Christianity reigned true religious dictatorship – heretics still remember it – and the easement gave the vulgus pecum social status just above the slave, but hey, this is all trifles! Ribouldingue, I know the Middle Ages more than you think. If I were fed the usual clichés, I committed the following errors: – Women's execrable (thank you to Regina Pernoud have crossed my path) – Science and Technology in neutral (while the bases current science were laid at the M-A) – poor hygiene (or the life expectancy was longer than we said) etc etc … The historians of the classical period have indeed left a vision nightmare of the medieval period, until, in fact, give the name of "Middle Ages" … Do you have any arguments, however,. Do you have any arguments, however, to counter what I say on the consideration of the mentally ill, the stranglehold of Christianity and the hierarchy of society? Ribouldingue & Al, you should just inform Fascione-victim, it seems somewhat ignorant on the subject. It would be better than to lend me words and thoughts that are not mine … Lisbeth Jeanne Bourin! Game of Temptation was more … Marina Vlady, Henri and Sophie Barjac Virlogeux playing in the TV adaptation, which was a success in the early 80s, but I'm talking about a time that people under 40 years can not know! …

bah could return under Napoleon it would far less ^ ^ Where even under de Gaulle, at the time of full employment, consumerism.

yes that's right, and you do not wash, eh? What a vision of the Middle Ages purely bookish, the republic has taken great care to transform the era of the cathedrals in dark times …. I would love to do if only for the food. And no pollution! And actually no immigrants. It was like today, finally, nothing has changed, better to be rich and healthy ….. etc!

Ah no, would rather die! not the time when I liked it the '50s, with these bad boys black jackets etc. … dancing … dancing http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d0vXxH1IEmQ&feature = What fvst bah! lol

continues to defend your little friends cpf when France will look to Iran you serras obliged to shake the walls and make discreet to avoid being hung on a football goal post

we will come back quickly because it is the barbarian invasions that plunged the ancient "enlightened" in the Middle Ages "obscurantist." Same cause, same effect!

You should read Pernoud Regine, you will realize that everything you think you know about the Middle Ages are only snapshots. Http://passionmedievale.sixieme-cercle.com/lire/pernoud_pourenfini.html

At this range of debilitated, it lacks the famous cliché: "It was the Dark Age of Europe" and you're there! This vision is now contradicted by all medievalists. Goodbye.

In Poland there is no abortion legal – I mean, no marriages between men and very few Muslims … No need to travel back in time when a journey of 2 hours is enough: the Poles do not live worse than us so far eh .

We return … lack of reading, brutalization by games and other religions, poverty, the king at the Elysee …

For 24 hours only!

And how I love! Golden Age for women who had access to all areas which were previously denied. She was financially free was a time "holy". Major in 12 years it can manage its own property, vote and marry the man of her choice. Read "The House of Angels" from I do not know that and I lug look ^ ^ @ Olive stops a bit, I'm not 20 years so I understand it ^ ^

Abortion: we can ban gay marriage: as

if we can do the muzzulmerdes, it will be the stone age, so we fall back against AC: NAVY in 2012!

For you because epilepsy is a mental illness, Olive? Dammit, if there is one on qr, he will love … That is a neurological grade, the middle ages is easily confused with intoxication with ergot. When we ' no special treatment, the only solution is prayer, Olive. … To Christianity not in the Middle Ages. There was a shift gradually. . I would say that the Church has become tyrannical when the crusade against the Albigenses. As for the hierarchy of society … at least one sarkome not likely to happen to the supreme power … Was it really bad?

do we not told that breastfeeding is a contraceptive?

no it is absolutely not a contraceptive! one of my friends got pregnant while she was breastfeeding her daughter only 5 months. And she had her menses barely a month after his birth.

You can get pregnant when you are breastfeeding, it's rare but it happens. I breastfed eight months I've never had a period. It's been one month since I quit and I still waiting! You should do with your gynecologist if your bleeding is normal. Good breastfeeding

No, breastfeeding is not a method of contraception. If your bleeding correspond to a return of the layer, you can get pregnant. So consult a doctor who will tell you a contraceptive method appropriate to your case

2-3% of women can get pregnant despite breastfeeding exclusf; LAM