Following the responses referring to the fact that this is not a baby, and there is no conscience, one may ask: What is the difference between abortion and murder of an adult "not conscious "asleep or unconscious? in both cases the victim "is not conscious." but does that justify murder?

I think not as they die … Einstein @ can not be a baby but still a human being alive … And … @ Kowai you know that? Evidence to the contrary? Although in the minds of proponents of the culture of death that. If I burn my hand I want you to prove you wrong … But you want one? Doctors have said previously abortionists. We kill the baby in the womb of his mother made desperate efforts to escape the deadly vacuum … @ Boudou you're to be pitied. A pregnant woman says she is expecting a baby … the heart beats at 3 weeks …

? What baby? At this stage it is called a fetus, not a baby.

It is an embryo before 12 weeks and it did not even realize what is happening. Demeter proves me wrong.

Issue-oriented or not ….. FYI, women abort an embryo that is to say the outline of a human being who is far from the constitution of a baby so caution in appellation given that you do not mind ……

At the time of abortion, human embryo that looks suspiciously like chicken! The baby does after birth!

What is the difference between abortion and murder of an adult "not aware" asleep or unconscious? I want to say out of context question, since there is someone who sleeps up completely so that when a woman aborts, she miscarried a baby but not an embryo! Ie at this stage there is no sensation possible. There's not even the cells which detect cold hot node, the pain of comfort, etc … And I am absolutely against the term "murder" when talking about abortion. We must get into their heads that when a woman aborts is not for fun, okay? Then, if she took this decision is that somewhere it is also best for the child. Why make the world a being who is not expected and therefore may suffer all his life when he has nothing to do? (And sometimes, the mother also has nothing to do). Abortion to save lives (ironically), this I am sure and it's still a great achievement for the Status of Women.

LOL!

in both cases the victim "is not conscious." but does that justify murder?

In the case of abortion you kill some cells if it is in early pregnancy in the case of an adult you kill a conscious person who has lived There is no mention of victim in the case of a person, fertilized ovum is not regarded as being a person

A fetus is an embryo, not a human being.

You really poses the question here? It's your best argument? The difference between an embryo and an adult? One is a been fully developed and autonomous. The other a small cluster of cells unable to survive outside the womb. One is already alive, the other not. One is a human being, the other not. Priestess @: I accept your argument ^^… I concluded that … Does it can still be semi-solid cannibalism?

1) Remove cells that are not even yet become a "person", and 2) kill "a human being" itself are two different things. In the first case, it allows the woman, who is free to do what she wants with her body and not be forced to have a dependent child if she does not feel ready or if n 'has the capacity (or even if she does not want, freedom requires a large number of possibilities). In the second, it is murder – because it is a human being born – and it will incur a prison sentence. I do not know how to explain it better. @ Sun Palestine: maybe you're upset for rape? It's weird as a principle, each his own eh. You're all well understood my words … I'll rephrase … you know many people who are scrambling to break / be raped? Rape is sexual intercourse involuntary victim (usually the woman) … if it results in a pregnancy, you must keep the poor victim the child of a psychotic monster? That we can understand ^ ^

The same as between oral sex and cannibalism.

That's 2 lives destroyed. The fetus is a living being called to life as a man or woman. the embryo is also a "living" in a human formation in the womb. Killing a person is unconscious, asleep, unconscious is murder in the same way that killing a conscious person. Do not compare abortion to murder someone who is already living outside the womb. An abortion is an abortion but it ends with a promise of life as a human being viable. You should better define what a "murder." In fact what do you really know your question so difficult?

An abortion is "murder of a man but not an embryo: an entity resembling a strawberry that has no independent life. A baby breathes, smiles, participates in its own way to human life. Second difference: The embryo is a part of the body of the mother. It's still up to her "his belly". Third difference: The mother is participating in a network of relationships and responsibilities far greater than that of the embryo. Her Life has a preponderance over that of the embryo. A death is a death but all the deaths were not the same psychological weight. An abortion is always a pain and trauma but obvious question is where is the "least evil ", the" least suffering ". The suffering of a woman who can not bear the idea of taking a child takes precedence over" souffreance (?) of an embryo.

the mother may abort the fetus if ONLY endangers her life or it would be premeditated murder. I like the philosophy of my neighbors above that justify abortion just to avoid liability to have a future baby to be conceived is jostling to become responsible and it sneaks! @ V For: Go! very good question you ask is, I admit that it is not easy to keep a baby after being raped, but I confess that do not know the view of my religion in such cases. Good question!

Human life must be respected whatever their stage of development from egg to the extreme age

earlier question .. I already answered you're a guy, leaves women a choice. the day your sister will break the day … or your wife will wait for a child with serious birth defect or disease rendering it non-viable …. will stop at the prudishness

abortion is a crime!

Frankly, you'd better not meddle with what you watch, and stop with all your "issues" anti-abortion that are used strictly for nothing .. wind is all that! legal abortion or not has always existed, and it's not that kind of talk to the jerk who will change anything .. Women are masters of their body, whether you like it or not, and the risk of disappointing you, there was no justification for anything! What do you think it's really the least of our worries …

It's terrible to see people speak of a living being growing at a phenomenal rate to become a child as a vulgar piece of gadget that is available as desired! Where is the will of the child in an abortion? Where is the right of the unborn child and live? Abortion not dispose of his body, have another one who can not pronounce. Of course it's terrible as a gesture for those women who went into action, it is with a heavy heart she did so, the fear directs, and this often causes irreparable injury! Frankly, it's time to ask if he had not been better for these women to keep the child rather than abort. I remind you that the deadline for abortion varies by country! Abortion is legal in two months in France 5 months in other countries. Have you ever seen the echoes and the child in the womb at 2,3,5,6 months? Well, in one case we are talking about children, and in another a gadget to remove annoying! It is completely. Have you ever seen the echoes and the child in the womb at 2,3,5,6 months? Well, in one case we are talking about children, and in another a gadget to remove annoying! It complètementhypocrite. Abortion is not a solution and millions of lives are suppressed for years under the pretext of freedom of women. I am a woman and it disgusts me to see such arguments! Abortion is source of problems, suffering, trauma, and made women believe that it will solve their problem. And precision: the abortions after rape are a tiny minority, it does not even represent 1%.

So if I understand correctly, you consider the embryo as a cluster of cells. But in this case, you are too! You too are composed of cells connected together, each having a specific role. The embryo also. You and him are not "clump of cells" but a living organism. I have thousands of arguments proving that life begins not at birth, but the encounter between an egg and sperm, that magic moment when the draft begins life: already, the child has his own agenda genetics. The body sends messages to prepare for this newcomer. Another argument, the dependence of this Peita man to his mother. But an infant is it not as dependent as he? And you, resist you naked without food in Antarctica? No. We all depend. And kill the weak is a crime, cowardice. MISUNDERSTOOD LIFE IS NOT A FORCE!

But I do not because even if humans for abortion is nothing before God and the people concerned will have to answer for murder. The world is completely ASSHOLE. I would like to respond a little to all these messages because I can not answer each individually, however I will like! Do not confuse everything there are millions of abortions each year worldwide for a yes or a no girls that have abortions! regarding orphan diseases by severity I think it's a matter of conscience (but a tiny percentage of all those abortions). Yes as long as the egg is fertilized it becomes a life on its own, for evidence in the Bible under the Mosaic law a person who "bumped" a pregnant woman and the baby if she lost the person who had bumped die was because it was a life for a life. It is God who made these laws which proves that even an embryo in any hour is a living thing in itself. Genetic code are already registered,. Genetic code are already registered, the color of her eyes, her hair, which he resembled his father or his mother, etc. …

You are against abortion is but what do you think of contraception? And sex education? Because for me the best weapon to bring down the number of abortions is better access to contraception and sex education for girls and boys. What do you think?

An embryo is not a baby, simply. And your god should answer for the murder of all children born dead, all miscarriages and babies u lost to accidents as we are! I also assign to the course for the Tsunami in Southeast Asia: 300,000 dead and for the storm in New Orleans! He better have a fucking god your lawyer! @ Dding: ha! That's it! I'm pissed! if so … So for you, the ultimate proof that biblical interpretation!? Ah bravo level of thinking. If you accidentally pushes a woman and she loses her baby must be killed! That is just divine justice for you right? Well let me tell you that your justice craind a max and I am very glad that our society does not enforce it. Your bible also justified slavery I remind you, do I conclude that you disapprove strongly the abolition of slavery? I would love to see you defend this abmination quoting the Bible, it would make me laugh! An embryo is not a living being,. Your bible also justified slavery I remind you, do I conclude that you disapprove strongly the abolition of slavery? I would love to see you defend this abmination quoting the Bible, it would make me laugh! An embryo is not a living being is just a cluster of cells. A living being has a minimum of autonomy, the embryo: 0. As mentioned in religious texts for "evidence", I recall that the Egis authorized the killing of up to 4 months pregnant, because she regarded the baby as not living up to four months. So, reversals jackets when it suits you …

A fetus is not a baby. No more than a sperm … When you dump the puree, 40 million sperm on average, what is it then, genocide?

If you had worked in psychiatry and as I saw this live as babies from birth you would have perhaps a different perception. All those who make an abortion is a déchirrement for them, do not forget that in time the women brushed against death for abortion but is it better to keep a child who does not and who will be unhappy all his life? What is regrettable is that in China where they can have only one child and India, where dowry is compulsory for a girl to marry is about making abortions as well as infanticide of girls.

this terrible case of conscience must no longer be present on the table. science has put at the service of humanity. each person who is sexually active must take its responsibility and protect women and men. préservatifs.vasectomie, pills, ect many choices. for unconscious? 's tans the worse for them.

a question. if you learn one day that your future child's disease harlequin http://www.google.com/images?hl=fr&safe=off&q=harlequin% 20ictiosis & um = 1 & ie = UTF-8 & source = & sa = N og & tab = wi & biw = 1280 & bih = 805 or any shit like this is horrible. what will you do? thou shalt have the courage or the nerve I know not to give birth to a sensitive human being with a functioning nervous system allows him to feel pain, knowing full well that all his life (he died pTet immediately , maybe in 10 or 40 years) will only PURE PAIN every gesture he will do. whenever it will even bend the arm, his skin will tear. it will likely end up like him http://images.encyclopediadramatica.com/images/b/bd/Partyman.jpg because that's what you have as a child. a living being who suffers Constantly. knowing that if the early months of pregnancy you have the hypocrisy to tell me that you will ensure that it is happy until his death, forgive me insult you but you're really a big. knowing that if the early months of pregnancy you have the hypocrisy to tell me that you will ensure that it is happy until his death, forgive me insult you but you're really a grosconnard. it comes from the heart, forgiveness. because it will never change the fact that he will suffer permanent and it will grow so very weird. and I sincerely hope that these images shocked thee! because it gets worse as orphan disease detectable from pregnancy. Today in 2011 the technology allows us to ensure that people can be born happy or die happy. unfortunately perverse religious concepts like the soul ect, not only hamper scientific progress, but also did nothing to fuck man (who is the first question I think)! it's so easy to invoke God to justify the suffering of others! kind with euthanasia. when you have a patient who wishes to have shortened his suffering, the doctor agrees, but you always relatives, religion crap with any erroneous concepts of Good and Evil and without empathy (the ability to put themselves in the shoes of someone else and ask if we would like that), who say no because only

http://www.mariereine.com/affiche.php3?ID=590&categorie=6

If they were men who had had birth, abortion was never a crime. I agree it is an evil, but a lesser evil!

There are actually tens of millions of abortions worldwide each year. This practice homicide is considered "normal" for the simple reason that there is a general hardening of human consciousness: "However, the inspired word clearly says that in times to come some will abandon the faith, paying attention to misleading inspired utterances and teachings of demons, 2 by the hypocrisy of men who tell lies, as being branded in their consciousness "(Timothy 4:1,2. Bible).

Hello! Life begins at fertilization. thus aborted a child is a life interrupted. Humans are not allowed to interrupt an innocent life. Deliberately cause an abortion by artificial means, by the use of drugs or a medical operation for the sole purpose of avoiding unwanted childbirth is a painful act for the woman both mentally and physically. It is even more violent for children as it does not survive. Life is a precious gift, it is sacred. A 2004 study among 331 Russians and 217 American women who had abortions found that in each half of the women subsequently experienced an unpleasant feeling, almost 50% of Russians and 80% of Americans felt 'guilty', and over 60% of Americans' do not forgive. " They are frequently subjected to pressure. Parents, spouse or well-meaning friends saying, "Of two evils one must choose the lesser" argument. Parents, spouse or well-meaning friends saying, "Of two evils one must choose the lesser" argument quipeut lead to a hasty decision and poorly lit. "But," says Priscilla Coleman, a specialist risk of abortion for mental health, once the stress of decision making and the abortion took place, the cognitive abilities of women returning to normal and deep guilt, sadness and regret settled. "Regret is usually around the question of abortion he put an end to what was already a life? According to the report of a study group on abortion (South Dakota), many women considering abortion "were misled: they believed that not take away anything other than cluster of cells'. If they had been told the truth, they would not abort. "After a summary of the" surprising and heartbreaking testimony "from 1940 women who had abortions, the study concluded:" The grief of losing a child, they were told, did not exist for many causes of anger . ". "Moreover," the psychological harm caused to a woman who knows she killed her child is often devastating. " A 2006 study focused on the lives of many women, adolescent girls were pregnant. Half of them had kept the child and the other half had failed. The study found that "the odds of receiving therapy, have problems sleeping and smoking marijuana were lower in cases of childbirth than in abortion cases." – Journal of Youth and Adolescence. Another report provided "the results of four studies of the most advanced worldwide. What we learned? That "the rate of psychological problems are higher among women who had abortions than among those who kept their child. "- Report of the Task Force on Abortion, South Dakota, 2005 In the end, everyone is free, but there are consequences in every decision: caring for a child when we are. "- Report of the Task Force on Abortion, South Dakota, 2005 In the end, everyone is free, but there are consequences in every decision: caring for a child when we estadolescent, or kill her child. The best thing is to have physical relationships when one is married couple, able to accommodate a child. Because we must not forget that the relations of this type are basically an expression of love that two people are doing, but also and above all a means to procreate. The solution is to teach young people that intimate relationships are sacred and they should not be taken lightly because they can give life to a person whom will be responsible. Good day!

The choice of abortion is primarily the woman and not a God who probably does not exist.

there was slaughter in the South and North Kivu, Congo Roayume. Several deaths on Sudan "Somalia" War in Congo Brazzaville, More deaths in the Republic of Côte d'Ivoire, several deaths in Angola almost everywhere in Africa rien.Plusieurs coup. It is the union boss who Euroépenne Africa, and did not intervene. Understand that we are called to repentance and conversion to head narmale of life that is happy and eternal in Jesus Christ, the Prince of Life. Do not judge, said, Jesus of Nazareth. We want to create new rules of good political governance, economic and financial planet because justice is a people growing up, but the sin is the shame of a nation. When life goes from bad to worse, we must have recourse to Jesus of Nazareth "God from true God who created us. Marriage does not like to be faillite.il secuiriser social life of the people, police and military basis of each country's national economonie the planet.

not me because I was looking for a baby for 20 years

looks like this instead: it happened a month ago and already 22 million hits! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXh7JR9oKVE&feature=player_embedded #! Happy Holidays

I will respond the same way I did it to another question on abortion. For those who do not want to admit the horror of abortion, to learn more: There are a lot of sites on the Internet where you can see the sad truth. Where you can see ultrasound pictures of fetus week by week, and also photos / videos of actual abortions that are unbearable for me. So do not forget the obvious! A fetus at 12 weeks it already looks like a tiny human being, and in some countries abortion is allowed up to 24 weeks or more! The fetus is a living and he suffers. Especially when we know the ways of all abortions that are really horrible. Some babies (especially those in some cases removed by caesarean section) did not die during the abortion, but after this one, yes it sometimes happens that they are still alive and dying after abortion. It's HORRIBLE. Some people should be more responsible. Some people should be more responsablequand the pill and forget … For children who will be born ill-formed, it is true that it's delicate dilemma understandable, or to children born of rape may be understand that it is psychologically hard for a woman to live. You can see things from different angles, but for my part, I am against abortion. Especially since most are of a forgotten pill, or other irresponsible.

the world has no morals!

I personally am not against abortion but it is a bit trivialized and show the truth to the students is a step towards allowing a lucid awareness and knowledge about the thing. Abortion is killing a living being, do not take it lightly!

Because he did not want to indoctrinate students with his own ideas.

videos shown to students must be shocking! and hurt the sensibilities of some students! despite that these videos will reveal a strict truth he did not intend to disclose it without authorization from his superiors! hello everyone!

we can see that you take issue with some nostalgia ……… well I shed a tear!

yes you do not know. and why do you kill him? It is a life after all. And if there was one only that God intended for you as a child?

leads do not want in your galères.tu kill her or what?

prepared to say goodbye when you

feeding a breastfeeding mom, you it plays on future tastes according to what your baby eats?

hello, I have no idea, because the milk does not taste what I eat!

Normally yes … That's why it is inadvisable to mother breastfeeding to eat peanuts and other nuts (so no MMs!). For this pass allergies baby …. Avoid cabbage and cauliflower also now to make more milk there are also tips: – Eat the lamb – Eat Quinoa – Drink a beer without alcohol a day – Drink herbal tea for breastfeeding (or sold in New Robinsons Naturalia). @ + Jules

q yes of course

hello my wife c is some promise in medicine and the problem is known to regulate c nan its been a better finish me that its hard and you do not know if there is a problem or c is normal? Can you help ????? ???????

A quick link is better than a great speech http://www.google.fr/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=6&ved=0CDoQFjAF&url=http% 3A% 2F% 2Fwww.planningchrr.com 2Ffeuillets%% 2Finformation-and- tips-in-abortion-ivg & ei = w-0-TPKYNsuKOPX_mcAH & usg = AFQjCNGuN29nWbThXcc2s5cckxvAj2xqsA Good luck to you both

why does she consults not the doctor who prescribed the medication? I think that a medical opinion is needed.

Your girlfriend / wife is big enough to call the doctor if there is a concern. It's crazy to ask for health advice on the internet like this …

doctor

and it can not go see her gynecologist, your wife?

The moderating Islamophobic propaganda – which I see for my part, as a feminist fools, in the very sense of anti-Semitism has been rightly considered a "socialism of fools" – regrets that Muslims and Muslim s do 'express little to defend feminism, the republic, secularism, etc.. Sometimes, however, Muslim women speak on feminism – or trying to do. For those that take time to read what they can have to say that most interested in the eternal lament of the invisibility of their way, here are some stories of women wearing the veil and claim their feminism on the conditions under which they do, and the obstacles they face. L emancipation of Muslim women could not be better achieved by the Muslim themselves, will you side with those who are promoting the image, or against them? Will you, despite their veils, along with those who claim the free disposal of their. Pharisee @ Liberated You're right, it is misleading not to commune with the current xenophobic French companies in its stigma and amalgamedes immigrants through Islam and the staging of its media avatars more obviously alienating. With demand for critical thinking of Marx and not give any credibility to a government and a head of state, especially those we are currently experiencing with regard to their claims for a secular and feminist commitment is obviously a contradiction on my part rough, and you've seen. Mea culpa. Exclude veiled teenage school system, punishing women victims of oppression archaic as the port imposed a cover in public, that's obviously emancipatory measures to help them free themselves from the grip against their of bearded fundamentalists, but as I have very bad spirit, I am just being biased. @ Sick 'n Destroy I totally agree with you that no one can seriously say feminist claim a religion in itself without causing considerable contradictions. But the problem seems to me another priority in. But the problem seems primarily other eneffet. The context of stigma and racist repression does not seem at all conducive to the maturing of this kind of contradiction – like many others, too. Instead, the defense of free discussion, confrontation and therefore the free access to public space, and the possibility of conflicting arguments with veiled women – which also means they do not prohibit them under the pretext of their veils, voice, and that scans do not have anything they can say on behalf of it: what many feminists have done so far, alas -: the radical rejection of the blackmail Official therefore the so-called "secularism" – seem to present a minimum.

To answer the question! "Will you, despite their veils, along with those who claim the free disposal of their bodies and the right to abortion? Give you just a little attention to what they have to say? "Yes, always!

To answer you: "Will you, despite their veils, along with those who claim the free disposal of their bodies and the right to abortion? Give you just a little attention to what they have to say ? "Obviously. A woman is a woman, with or without a veil for me. So yes, a woman has the right to freely dispose of his body, and yes I listen when I speak. I listen even those I do sometimes think of evil. Simply because if I refused to listen, I will feel to become even more pitcher than I already am. By the way, I liked the two links.

Of course he must support them, they like others, for "the disposal of their bodies and the right to abortion." The veil is another subject that appeals to nostalgia for certain authoritarian policies. The veil is the Muslim religion that the skirt is to the Catholic religion. Should we assume that all women who wear skirts to submit to the constraints of old states who obeyed blindly patriarchal concepts of the Catholic Church, and therefore they are Catholic fundamentalists, who do not deserve to comment on feminist cause? it would be funny. and even if they did, they would have every right to comment on the feminist cause (and on any subject!). and yet it is the trial is being done towards the veil.

Personally, I make the distinction between Muslims and jihadists. If I chose my side in the psychological warfare that we are one sly, it does not stop me from treating others as I have always done in public. Because, as a democrat, I find it normal. And more reason, it would give a victory for jihad that unite all Muslims.

Admittedly, this is a realistic observation and "positive." But if we abandon this political fact for a moment that you husk with a sharpness too rare in political thinking, still does not he still a contradiction between women's emancipation and being eligible to remain in the religious affirmation of liberation? No monotheistic religion does not tolerate really feminist demands. It can be practiced without some contortions and feminist notional perfectly hypocritical. Or is that reinvents his religion on a personal level, which is in contradiction with "re-ligere. Every religion is pro-life and pro-herd. The individual is an idea, a word without reality in the mouth of a practitioner, and ideological freedom is not compatible with. Not that there is a religion more stupid than the others, just different states of acceptance by the progress of individual liberties in the West and elsewhere … So I would fully agree with your resume and less on Marx. So I would fully agree with your resume and less on Marx ladefense Muslim women supposedly feminist, and I am far from being aligned with Marxism in general …

I do not terrorism in the other direction, that addresses Islamophobic anyone who criticizes (in the sense argument against argument) Islam. As for those women, yes we are still at their side that's the criticism I address them: – Wearing the veil is placed anywhere in the Quran, the Muslims of France are mostly North Africans who have never worn the veil in France or in their countries of origin, veiling is therefore an expression of political Islam and committed. It raises the perennial problem of representation of Muslims. This group can speak in its name because it is not representative of Muslims or Islam … – They say the choice of abortion but point "is an acquired right, which is accurately recognized and codified in texts of Islamic reference. " What does that mean? they oppose the laws feminist / Republican who are not recognized by Islamic law? – they will be for the separation of men and. What does that mean? they oppose the laws feminist / Republican who are not recognized by Islamic law? – they will be for the separation of men and desfemmes in universities, swimming pools, hospitals, … current demands of the Muslims 'involved' – What is their position on Muslim countries that impose the veil on women, they can not ignore the reality of Islam that rightly cause an outcry here: the minority of veiled French are protected by the laws of the Republic but the majority of veiling in the Muslim world suffer. So once again I'm alongside all feminists without distinction, but there you arrive quickly at the edge of the thing …

oops … these stories are too long to read, but for me, browsing in the diagonal I realize there are a lot of Islamophobia in all this. By putting things in my view white woman's secular France from below, I admit be uncomfortable with women wearing the veil but he'll come to me any insult to the spirit of these women as in the cases described in these articles. Each his way of living, secular or religious! (Who am I to judge?) I am also sure that if I had the opportunity to speak with a veiled woman (from this and many other things, there's so much to share among women!) that this gene would disappear. Ignorance is certainly the cause of much misunderstanding. … In short I'm scared to see women's movements can also stigmatize violently veiled woman, while the latter they also fought-for freedom of women! "Will you, despite their veils, along with those. I'm scared to see women's movements can also stigmatize veiled woman violently, so that they are fighting themselves, also for the freedom of women! "Will you, despite their veils, along with the free cellesqui claim disposal of their bodies and the right to abortion? Give you just a little attention to what they have to say? "Yes, yes of course

I will always side with women and their rights! That is clear. But the veil is not and never will be a right to dispose of his body as abortion. Certainly not! Women do not have to be submitted! Women do not hide … NOTHING can justify it. However, wear a scarf over her hair and veil, this is not the same thing. But it can not be justified by religion.

very interesting, you let me take your links on R & S

>> "If Islamophobia is satisfied, therefore, ample room for a media storm stigmatizing the staging of repression, and a pseudo unanimity principle (of the extreme left to extreme right, all of agree to attack Islam, "the conceptual framework is biased, one wonders what is the rest of it? In fact, we can both ambient and Islamophobia invoqeer a claim of Marx" criticism of religion is the prerequisite to the review of the policy. "For example:>>" Will you, despite their veils, along with those who claim the free disposal of their bodies and the right to abortion? "The problem is not" to be with. "The claim of right to abortion is not" the right of free disposal of their bodies. "This includes the right to be veiled or not the right to challenge the patriarchal order of virginity imposed on women and not men, short of a moral sexual double. This included the right to be veiled or not, the right to challenge the patriarchal order of virginity imposed on women and not men, short of a moral sexual doublestandard. The right to contraception and Abortions should be supported wherever women deem necessary. We must also remember that this right is intensely political in that it is a right "of free inquiry" is not a right "requirement" but a "right-choice" in this sense offers q'uil women all that he denies the ongoing reform of Islam is confined to the limitation of the freedom of women (the Algerian family code, so-called obligation of the veil, etc. …)

but bringing children into the world to see them suffer your answers thanks good day ♥

we're on the topic "pregnancy" or "futility"? damn, still a bug in Yahoo or I must have been mistaken by clicking.

Extensive debate … is not the time

you tell me when you can laugh eh? bizzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

it is better aborted than to be left by the moths eat ♠ hello

Bj / Too hard to answer this question …. kiss ¤ ^ ^ Good day …

no to abortion yes to marriage with 2 children

I am against abortion, but otherwise, if it is to put a baby abandoned and invalid qlqs months or years later, when abortion is better … Kisses Flash

Since you are pro-abortion, your parents should have aborted you!

Well, Twat. I am neither pro-abortion or anti. What a woman wants to make her stomach is not mine and not to YOU to decide. Occcupes up your ass.

Strange behavior

Perhaps it is better not to have been rather than having had a rough life …

But my parents wanted a child, head of con! Nobody wants to make abortion mandatory ….

You do not even know what an abortion potato. A true abortion, not a propaganda film obscurantist.

we entrust you all children of abortion = Vrait you tell us your impression in a year ok

Catholics are against abortion, but when a girl is pregnant at 14 years as a result of rape, he is thinking!

When you see the bunch of idiots who roam the earth, I wonder if you have no reason for me … I am for the right of women to control their bodies and their lives … 1'Um1

Here, you have included: being pro-abortion means trying to force all pregnant women to abort. It is curious, the term "con as an oyster" comes suddenly to mind …

These are not parents who have abortions, but only women. For my part, I am happy to be wanted and I thank my mother. And yours, of mother she regrets?

One may prefer to have a nation of weak http://www.consang.net/index.php/Global_prevalence

Hi, oyster!

Everyone has a brain, is not to say that people like you use it. It's the same here, not because all women have the right to do what they want their body (it does not concern you), including abortion, they abort for each child.

In all cases your parents to you, they should not be "pro-avortment "…. shame.

Ah ah ah ah ah … you have almost succeeded, I was on the verge of choking with laughter about this issue.

Great argument … away as others?