Sheikh Al-Hasan Basri [(641-642 - 728-729) AH, 21-110] Nicknamed Abu el-Hassan Seid bin Abil-Hassan Yecar, born in Medina, he was raised in the house of the Messenger ( saws) and sat among the companions, his first name "Hasan" he was also given by Umar (may Allah be pleased), who invoked God's blessings upon him. His father was a freed slave Zayd Ibn Thabit, and his mother a slave freed from the Mother of the Believers, Umm Selama, which takes care of him like his own son, suckling her milk blessed and said: "My God, provides your child with this and do that becomes the model of the Family "Al Ghazzali said of him:" He is the one whose words were closer to those of the Prophets, and one whose example the closest of Companions of the Prophet – peace and blessings be upon him. "Confirming the words of Imam An-Nawawi about him:" He is a leader, a scholar refined, a lawyer, a trusted man, a devotee, an ascetic knowledge. Once freed, the slaves from Hasan Basri seréunirent and spoke to him in his words: "O pious religion, we have to reproach you." "About what?" He replied. They said: "Why have you waited all these weeks to talk about our postage when you knew how much we needed it?" He replied as follows: "What delayed me is that I had no slaves or what to buy. When Allah gave me some money [by working for it], I bought a slave and then I have freed. So when I called the people to emancipate their slaves in my sermon, their hearts were open to my word, because I had first applied what I asked others. "Memorial of the Saints (Attar)

I think it is better to quote the Prophet's sira rather than other people at risk of them hoisted pae low times to a degree of sacredness, for Hasan al Basri you know that others have used his thoughts to create too u know Mâtazilites Cotesti,

The prophet that the salvation of God be upon him said: "I left you two things if you follow these you will never go astray is the Koran and the Sunna …"

I defy you asshole Wherever you want wherever you are!! allleez chick just for that ISLAM ??????????????

According to Aisha, may God be pleased with him, the holy Prophet, peace be upon him and hello, reported that God said: "Whoever offends one of my beloved (Waly Awliya plural) I declare war. My servant can get closer to me than through what I've ordered. By his acts of supererogation, it is closer to what I love. And if I like it, I get the eye with which he sees, the ear with which he hears, the hand with which he grasps things.

thank you for the reminder of this eminent scholar whose piety rahimahu allah remember Sheikh Cha'rawi rahimahu allah, I invite the opportunity to see mm exegesis of the Quran that man I admire as well.

Has links with Bin Laden?

Fatigue but also by obligation when traveling, I will be induced to leave my baby and I can not get my milk from which the resort to artificial milk. I do not know if it is harmful to his little belly. So far (six weeks) he did not have colic. A little bit sore one day and that's it. It happened very quickly. Consequence of a temporary mixed feeding? Thank you!

Of course not. By cons, it is not clear that he accepts!

It is not until the formula is bad for baby's tummy, but only that it does not digest the same way as breast milk. Nobody can know in advance how to react the digestive system of your baby … It may well have to digest it as colic, spit up, be constipated … The biggest risk is that of nipple confusion. It is possible that after having tasted a bottle baby does not want or do not know more breastfeed. Some babies pass easily from breast to bottle and the bottle to the breast, while for others it takes is a bottle for all haywire. This is not inevitable but it is a real possibility. Some will tell you that it does not risk anything, they did not worry … Good for them! Mostly it's true that it goes well, but be aware that there are still a risk (and when it falls on you …). It is more prudent to offer milk in another way (syringe, pipette, glass, cup, …), especially if. ), Especially for troubleshooting sic'est only once or twice. Finds time to rest is important. A nap at the same time that baby and you're off again! Courage!

Hello, I exclusively breastfeed my children for three months and by the fourth month I included a bottle of milk powder, the fourth month. No worries. My children are easily took a bottle. At worst if you can, ask Dad to give him. That said INFORMED near you in your / your pediatrician when a brand of milk to make.

Not even had a small stroke of seals soft and not too dark?? I'd be surprised.

You just do a mixed feeding which is sometimes recommended by physicians because the mother has insufficient milk or mixed you finally stopped breastfeeding because it is a step baby will probably be in a few months than bottle … If you're afraid of collic … Just watch the milk powder that you give to your baby … and especially the quantity of milk. DRINK bottle is easier, so baby can take large amounts of milk … or drinking too fast … and that could give him a stomach ache … So as a mom you see how he likes it or not the bottle or not he likes his pacifier … and if you mixed from time to time and that baby is growing well … OF COURSE be vigilant in relation to colic and constipation mostly … My children have always been mixed … and most important is to not change the milk powder … because it can cause constipation. By cons, when you give him the bottle you limit your lactation and therefore eventually you'll get a little less milk …

You need not justify yourself, give the bib when you can not breastfeed and if you think he has collic then chooses a milk thickens.

bin at the beginning I gave a bib from time to time although I was breastfeeding exclusively to be able to rest had opted for the rubber pacifier nuk nikel been no confusion. after the choice of milk I know what I had but there's always a risk to her stomach because you can not know in advance how his body will react. then sit back and sleep when baby sleeps and other household leaves aside … me either I can not get my milk and I've been full.

A woman said to me – I fled. I had my daughter in, a little girl cried, and I was afraid they might hear his voice. Imagine, he was a child of two months, she had no more strength than a fly. My kisses were trying to close her mouth, she cried still, alas! she gasped. She wanted to breastfeed, I had no milk. A whole night had passed that way. I hid behind a door aisle, I cried, I saw the shining rifles. They sought my husband wanted to shoot it. Suddenly the morning, under this awful door, the child did not cry more. Sir, she was dead. I touched it, sir, it was cold. So I did not care that we should kill me; outside, Random, I took my daughter, I was mad, I ran, passersby spoke to me, but I ran away, and I do not know where I dug my hands in the campaign a hole at the foot of a tree at the corner of a paddock lonely, And I lay my sleeping angel in the earth. So I did not care that we should kill me; outside, Random, I took my daughter, I was mad, I ran, passersby spoke to me, but I ran away, and I do not know where I dug my hands in the campaign a hole at the foot of a tree at the corner of a paddock lonely, And I lay my sleeping angel in the earth that the child we went, it's hard to bury. And the father was there, began to cry.

it's very, very beautiful even if the subject is sad

Hello It's sad but impressionable Thanks for sharing

Wonderful poem evoking a subject, alas, common and recurrent in the days when Hugo wrote, namely infant mortality. Which book is it mined?

Hugo is known as a poet and writer, he was known less as a political opponent of Napoleon III.

This poem is taken from the Terrible Year, a collection of poems by Victor Hugo, published in 1872. He talks about the year 1870 during which France suffered both a war against Prussia and the civil war in Paris. Victor Hugo knows we speak of the human soul.

Thank you, I do not know. A political rebel, the near real-Victor Hugo, the power of the storyteller, the poet huge .. the universality of his writing … alone a film …

please help me g live with a man here and then g 3semaines am pregnant and I was saying he said that abortion "… I agree the abortion is in 5jours.et the guy behaves more bien.quand I call it do not answer my calls (he told me that the phone has rays we must reduce our phone chats) or because it is just for a few minutes and then he said I'll just remember it to call after 2 am yesterday and I dream he is cheating on me … I do not know if it's just my thoughts … that's the reality I suffer a lot of ense …. is what he likes m? or is he doing with what I'm enceintete? he cheats or what and what to do with this enfanpourquoi he acts like this? what can I do?

No you do not like it

one hand, it does not seem to be eager to assume, and also had to take a contraceptive method (you or him)

he is afraid and it is normal for a child is a shot in the leg – it is certainly just not ready to be a dad (and force it would be a terrible mistake, NOT the dad is agnostic not a child once there most of the time, my father did not want and I crapped my childhood) – would be best to abort and if necessary, to talk with him.

ale! laiisee down the guy not love it na. but what is the baby you're the only one to take this decission.lui he does not want the baby but you, my daughter ,??????

Wonderful! You're pregnant, and he decides. In addition, he will flee now. Does he love you? NO! Otherwise, he would behave differently

It is possible that love might not be ready for the child, is also irresponsible to hand a habit not to sign of life I'd end up saying you had two that I am cons I support abortion and less deadly.

Seeking a better man, a man who will love you no matter what.

You can not do anything as long as you fell pregnant, you had cooled and he takes a step back to you and your situation.En clear he does not love you seriously otherwise it would not behave this way. . In addition you'll get an abortion to please him, think well before you do not regret ais thereafter for a guy who does not really worth the trouble. Good luck

then I cross it plays with your feelings …

Very sad case, but it could be for you a truly effective aid? In truth, I think this man has no love for you. He did not share anything with you. It does not even respect you if you had liked, he would have been happy to share with you your joy of being pregnant. There, he fled his responsibilities and he will flee as well. What to do with the child? It depends on your personal situation (age marital status, employment status, your social position). If you can do, of course, keep her and love this child instead of the other selfish. But if your personal situation does not keep the child … you have a choice, it can be very painful. The thing to do immediately before and 5 days is to break up with your guy! That is my position. I do not know what you think, your choice is the last resort.

No it does not love you. Abortion and bar you! If he loved you he would consider living with you and was glad you're pregnant.

If he loved you he would be there for you character: he does not love you! What to do with this child: it has to choose you in your heart and soul The dream is there to guide your actions is your subconscious talking to you and he's right

You've made gown, complete.

If he loved you he would not accept abortion, so keep your baby leaves to rebuild your life with your child, especially good luck

he loves you not your situation is not nice to call at any hour c not very gallant t invent lies to the phone also takes a cautious hand in your life and finally leaves the fact that this is the fairest and logical to you for this abortion

This weekend was the anniversary of our 2 years. I offered a very good perfume + a very nice shirt + the video games he wanted. And he, nothing. A kiss on the cheek and wrapped it weighed! What shocks me is not so much the fact of not having a gift, but the differential treatment that is between me and the ex. Last year and earlier this year, we experienced some difficult times (Separation / Engagement with another (for him) exactly one year ago / abortion …) and I thought really hit the mark for our 2-year . He did not see it that way and prefer the anniversary passed unnoticed. With his ex, it was photos galore, little words caring and personalized. East – what my concern is legitimate? Should I worry or passed over in silence this misadventure?

Your guy is selfish, what you already know since you're dating for two years.

perhaps that he hath reserved for a surprise later …….. after ….. I do not know …. But men, and dates …..!! it depends …. I am not alarmed now, but is a bit …. weird there …

There is no smoke without fire!

and exchange of guy you bought it 'that you need

It is best to talk about it openly. Tell him how you feel … The cover of gifts will not make it more loving.

it is fully understood, it is so much interest that it carries you to you. And when you begin to ask questions about this sudden change, tell him I also when you want, you can be dumb. It is when we love someone we are more attentive, so it was like that with his ex, and he has never been with you … asks you questions. He did all that you say? Have you talked to him for the difference between his ex and you? Talk mucha him.

I think that you should in future retain a little more because your generosity to give and not give a guarantee that we will get our turn. Relationships are not always fair I admit and this man always seems to hurt your recent past. Only time will tell if you have to persevere in the relationship or end it.

We do not ever tells you that we should not look for love stories, each relationship is différente.S it does not make a big party (photos etc.), he must have his reasons and you should him speak. Maybe he worries right now or sth wrong, there is only speaking one can know because there you make films alone ….

you're not a toy my great separation engagement with another he takes you then you deserve better and spend your pennies otherwise!

save you as soon as possible, he should find his ex, that bastard

"Separation / Engagement with another (for him )….." Maybe the would be preferable for you to put an end to your relationship with that in my humble opinion, it is no future.

uh yes it offends me … he did not think at the moment, it is human right, strictly speaking … But the least we can do is offer you something in return after having received his gift to him .. this is not a question to accept a gift but a principle … it shocks me almost as much as anything unless it had offered for Christmas or your birthday … you should tell him I think … it gives me the impression he does not invest much in your relationship than you invested yourself … I do not speak in terms of money of course .. for me it lacked even an act, because he unconsciously wanted to make you aware of something, his state of mind to it … for if he had wanted to avoid that you may be disappointed, or simply that you ask yourself questions, he would have offered something then, that any thoughtful man would have done to me .. but that he did not and does not hide it, it does not seem to bother him … I do not want to judge this guy that I do not know, and it was perhaps not realized, but I doubt it a bit since. I do not want to judge this guy that I do not know, and it was perhaps not realized, but I doubt it was a bit vucomment with his exes. So I would take more or less as a warning for you. It would be better to have a discussion with him to clarify things .. story that you do not waste your time with this guy who brought you obviously already drooling before … Moreover, it does not concern me, but hey, abortion was a common decision or it is just him who would not? Anyway, talk to him, and after notice …

You are together for 2 years and he had another engagement to a year ago? "There is something wrong as there … So I would say (from what I imagine and feel) that this anniversary was missed the logical continuation of your story.

Hadith of Abu Dawud, # 4428 "Buraidah said Ghamidi A woman came to see the Prophet and said:" I committed fornication ", He said come back later! / share in exile" (I 'm not sure of the meaning) She returned the next day, she came to him again and said: "Maybe you want me back like you did to Maiz b. Malik. I swear by Allah that I am pregnant. "Out of the tribe, exile in the desert could mean the slow death of thirst and starvation or slavery by another clan. He said:" come back when you've given birth to the child. "So, it is then distributed. When she gave birth to the child she brought the child, and said:" There he is! I gave birth. "He said:" returns, breastfeeding until it is weaned. "When she had weaned him, she brought him with something in his hand which he ate ( as evidence that he was". Saheeh says they are a minority in Paradise: Volume 4, # 6600:" Imran Husain reported that the Messenger of Allah said: among the inhabitants of Paradise, the women are a minority. "Al Hadis, Vol . 1, p. 215 "Umar narrated that the Prophet (Muhammad) who said: No man will be questioned for beating his wife." Almire mouth is legally my wife to see me reading the Koran and the Bible every night ^ ^ plus it makes me want to have my 3 other women lol

Contrary to widespread belief in Muslim converts, the Koran does not teach a loving god, but god ruthless, cruel, nasty, ignorant, versatile, tyrannical and totalitarian. His hatred of contradiction makes it terribly jealous and hostile against all those who doubt the good faith of its existence. As informed dialogue might expose his true nature, He called his followers to a perpetual war against unbelievers, "source of evil and misfortune for the rest of humanity." Unlike the God of the Bible (which however, is not so hot either by sacrificing his son or destroying the world before Noah), Allah will judge little about the good works of a man, but its degree of obedience and submission to His name. The word "Islam" means "resignation" in Arabic, stresses the importance He attaches to the submission of the world. And as any tyrant, that Allah is gracious from the moment we just do not doubt his power, nor to call into question its. And as any tyrant, that Allah is gracious from the moment we just do not doubt his power, or question sonautorité. Far from being a forgiving Heavenly Father happy ingratitude of her children, Allah will plunge through the hellish tortures opponents of his sincere policy of expanding war, He the Master of Vengeance. Far from longing for the salvation of all small creatures, He predestined from the beginning part of them perished in the fire of hell, without that divine choice is motivated not by any objective reason. Far from marrying the path of peace and fraternal harmony, Allah fanning the flames of discord and hatred among men, He leads his troops under the bloodstained banner of jihad. The cruelty of Allah The abuse of countless believers beyond comprehension. The flames of hell are as nothing compared to the torture of Allah knows the secret because: "Allah is powerful in torment" (s.2, V.160) Or: "Allah is even stronger and to punish violent "(s.4, V.86) Various refinements exist in the torture of Allah. Allah has promised such. Allah has promised by exempleune "drink boiling water" in punishment for unbelievers (s.6, v. 69). But the most monstrous sadism is reserved for those who dare to doubt its existence, as we learn from this passage particularly horrendous (s.4, V.59): "Those who disbelieve our signs we will burn in fire. Whenever their skins are roasted through, we will give them other skins so they can feel the punishment. "More generally, although this criticism applies equally to Christianity and other religions, there is a glaring imbalance between the appearance of limited duration of a sin nature and the unlimited hellish time of torture. But how can we qualify as a good God who would inflict a punishment far greater than the fault?

You do not stuff more fun to read? Paasilinna You know? The Finnish author? I just put myself in his latest novel. This guy puts me in a good mood with his world enough délirant.Et not mystical at all ….

Repentance is not absolution! repent is to accept the punishment we deserve after having broken the law, it is not clear forgive the faults of others but accept his repentance! it No 'there is repentance until one has been cleansed of evil that was committed, ie when one has suffered the penalty for this mistake! @ Aphraim frankly, you can mute the times, but your bullshit that goes here you'll see serious wrong link this book on Amazon that you have read and j'ail completely wrong, God also told him even in the hadith "My love always exceeds my anger!" and the sentence that opens all suras in the Quran is "in the name of God Forgiving and Merciful" not in the name of God mad and vindictive! http://www.amazon.fr/Mis% C3% A9ricorde kiss-all-things-lessons / dp/2953220038/ref = sr_1_1? ie = UTF8 & s = books & qid = 1285502637 & sr = 8-1 @ ha repentance Allah is the recognition of guilt and willingness to correct it, not just complain but will.com / Mis% C3% A9ricorde-embrasse-toute-chose-enseignements/dp/2953220038/ref = sr_1_1? ie = UTF8 & s = books & qid = 1285502637 & sr = 8-1 @ ha repentance Allah is the recognition of fault and the will to correct it, not just complain but vouloirconstructivement repair the consequences of this mistake! but when you can not correct and it is too late, repented heartily submits to the punishment that he will pay his due justice to the human world, divine justice, so seeing her fault to be repaired because paid him no grudge held in the Day of Judgement, what would happen if the abettor had repaired his fault or paid on earth! You are all a victim of propaganda which islmaophobe when speaking of Islam does the acent on the legal aspects of Islam and its spiritual aspect ever! Sura 2 "we have prescribed the law of retaliation , eye for eye, tooth for tooth … and it is only fair but those who can forgive and not to punish those that shall have the preference of God, because God prefers them as those who forgive him! "it is not true say that Islam is cruel and legalistic! It is ignorance that makes you say such things! @ Freeway is true, the woman insisted four times to be stoned, the prophet found. and it is only fair, but those who can forgive and not to punish those that shall have the preference of God, because God prefers them as those who forgive him! "It is untrue that Islam is cruel and legalistic! Is ignorance that makes you say such things! @ Freeway is true, the woman insisted four times to be stoned, the prophet trouvanttoujours an excuse for Chan to notice him! @ Aphraim the punishments that you cite are in the bible! all this should not be taken literally, but what I say I know it falls into the ears of a fool! then … what can I do?

NO you know one woman who would be pardoned? (Without pressure internationnal) the Islamic legal, is pitiless as the invention of allah mohamed has killed one woman and cites this example in death, the bleeding is all the world of this visionary psychopath worse, they say we fault confessed is half forgiven if they confess, there is no pardon this brief calls the guilty to lie and say that Allah will punish them after he did not care, just avoid horrible deaths of the franchise is punished not surprising there are so many fake ass hypocrites and even between them there s'entube have only the word traitor in their mouths the true God of love of Jesus was sensitive to sincere repentance and forgive, not punish, go in peace, I do not condemn you, go and sin no more even, without repentance, in compassion adulterous woman, ready to be stoned ^ Jesus has defended its executioners without asking the woman expecting repentance, conviction quran a bad copy paste inworst of the law of retaliation and without forgiveness, the law of MOSES is obvious to repent is to accept the punishment we deserve after having broken the law, FALSE repent is to confess his guilt, his sin punishment or not, alone in your room before God and his righteous anger you confess the notion of punishment, it is not necessary that Muslims, who understand nothing of God and always speaks in terms of punishment, punishment recognition etc. of sins, the truth confess, then, according to St. Augustine, "to the truth," and therefore requires particular discipline and humility to the truth. purification: Always according to St. Augustine, a Christian confessio peccati accompanied always a confessio laudis. repentance under pressure to severe punishment is what a free upfront if you repent to escape a painful death is what NOBLE before your God? Repentance is recognized by Judaism and Islam . Repentance is viewed negatively. Repentance is a way to négativenotamment because it can be preceded by a punishment. Indeed, in some societies of the past and today, we start by punishing the guilty named and then do the restores that if he repents. RENEWED on, he threw over the boulders? Posthumously then !

lool but it's not disinformation, man, al-ghamidia comes for the punishment of stoning being applied to him, and Mohammed returns it several times, and she insisted.

the messenger of Allah (pbal) said: God Almighty says: gil o Adam, as long as you call me, I pray you, I forgive you for what you did, and I don 't stand it in rigor. No son of Adam, even though your sins were to reach the clouds of heaven, and you then ask me forgiveness, I forgive you. No son of Adam, even if you came to me with sins as great as the earth and you then you present to me, do not attribute to me any partner, I will grant you forgiveness nearly as great. Allah is great , Merciful and Forgiving. praise alone; amine Allahu akbar

I have Allah as God, Islam as a religion and Muhammad 'Isa as a prophet, and you hate them more and more I love them!

This inextricable link that binds us to our child is born with this instinct that the child, as if we press a switch and the role of mother seems to us immediately obvious as to drink when thirsty! j 't believe, but I have still some doubt, I do not speak of love, I speak of instinct which are two different things. When you say all come alone .. but when baby is born it still shows you how to breastfeed, and when he cries as well and keep the tag on the hospital has any colic, so that in essence the instinct is something natural, therefore, we should not ask so many questions for you, so the maternal instinct is a reality that is part of human nature? or is it just a concept??

no! you did or you did not is not necessarily innate, that is something you learn throughout the day with your little one, unfortunately, many women have abandoned their child not fiber Kindergarten

I think the maternal instinct does not exist. It was maternal love, that's clear, but I do not think we can speak of instinct. Honestly, I have given birth by two weeks (perhaps before, it was decided not too) and I know that at the beginning, well I'm gonna do shit. Same with breastfeeding, it is not as "self" than certain (e) s claim and it may take time to implement or not properly fall into place. In short, I think you learn gradually as you need to learn, simply.

You point out yourself: you must learn these things. So where in all this is instinct, exactly? For me it is clearly no. As for love, I would call option and the examples of women who, without the freezer to fuck little carers and / or bad thing remains common throughout the world. Formerly, many were those who abandoned them at every opportunity. Since the religious or social pressures have changed and a new pretext was found … Personally if I had to raise a child (if rather extreme denial of pregnancy / discovered later on, for example) I do not think I would have committed, or that I wanted to take care puisqu'être mother is something I've never desired (we are still social beings!). Fortunately, now I no longer likely sterilized much!

to the limit, I would not call maternal instinct, but instinct "animal", some gave voice, while others will be more rational in the Cartesian and I made … lots of things "dictated" by my animal instinct: breastfeed (because I am a mammal), sleep with my baby (because in nature, mothers do not let their little sleep "away"), to raise against me a + whenever possible, do not panic at the slightest fart around. babies also have that animal instinct more or less present (and that leaves him more or less express). I always remember my second son was born. So I was lying on his stomach, he has "crawled" a few centimeters, and was transplanted in the most natural manner, as if he had his whole life! We are taught breastfeeding because Rare are those in our time, who saw their mothers, aunts or other women around them breastfeed their children, so we know how to change a diaper …

If, according to the church, the "morning after pill" is already considered an abortion, a new question arises: Masturbation may be seen as a premeditated murder? Moreover, oral sex is what becomes of cannibalism ? And so, can we consider the withdrawal as parental neglect and what can we say about condoms? Was it murder by suffocation? I remain perplexed. ! Could someone help me??? I want to go to heaven ……….. Signed :……….. John Peupue.

its all it's nothing to do with human stupidity heaven good day

Hey well if they must go without all that much to go to heaven, I've got as much down to hell.! RTTP Kisses Flash

Bj / all this bullshit ….. kiss ¤ ^ ^ Happy Sunday

foutése all blah-blah

With regard to sex is best to avoid listening to the Church, they do not understand much about it!

The moderating Islamophobic propaganda – which I see for my part, as a feminist fools, in the very sense of anti-Semitism has been rightly considered a "socialism of fools" – regrets that Muslims and Muslim s do 'express little to defend feminism, the republic, secularism, etc.. Sometimes, however, Muslim women speak on feminism – or trying to do. For those that take time to read what they can have to say that most interested in the eternal lament of the invisibility of their way, here are some stories of women wearing the veil and claim their feminism on the conditions under which they do, and the obstacles they face. L emancipation of Muslim women could not be better achieved by the Muslim themselves, will you side with those who are promoting the image, or against them? Will you, despite their veils, along with those who claim the free disposal of their. Pharisee @ Liberated You're right, it is misleading not to commune with the current xenophobic French companies in its stigma and amalgamedes immigrants through Islam and the staging of its media avatars more obviously alienating. With demand for critical thinking of Marx and not give any credibility to a government and a head of state, especially those we are currently experiencing with regard to their claims for a secular and feminist commitment is obviously a contradiction on my part rough, and you've seen. Mea culpa. Exclude veiled teenage school system, punishing women victims of oppression archaic as the port imposed a cover in public, that's obviously emancipatory measures to help them free themselves from the grip against their of bearded fundamentalists, but as I have very bad spirit, I am just being biased. @ Sick 'n Destroy I totally agree with you that no one can seriously say feminist claim a religion in itself without causing considerable contradictions. But the problem seems to me another priority in. But the problem seems primarily other eneffet. The context of stigma and racist repression does not seem at all conducive to the maturing of this kind of contradiction – like many others, too. Instead, the defense of free discussion, confrontation and therefore the free access to public space, and the possibility of conflicting arguments with veiled women – which also means they do not prohibit them under the pretext of their veils, voice, and that scans do not have anything they can say on behalf of it: what many feminists have done so far, alas -: the radical rejection of the blackmail Official therefore the so-called "secularism" – seem to present a minimum.

To answer the question! "Will you, despite their veils, along with those who claim the free disposal of their bodies and the right to abortion? Give you just a little attention to what they have to say? "Yes, always!

To answer you: "Will you, despite their veils, along with those who claim the free disposal of their bodies and the right to abortion? Give you just a little attention to what they have to say ? "Obviously. A woman is a woman, with or without a veil for me. So yes, a woman has the right to freely dispose of his body, and yes I listen when I speak. I listen even those I do sometimes think of evil. Simply because if I refused to listen, I will feel to become even more pitcher than I already am. By the way, I liked the two links.

Of course he must support them, they like others, for "the disposal of their bodies and the right to abortion." The veil is another subject that appeals to nostalgia for certain authoritarian policies. The veil is the Muslim religion that the skirt is to the Catholic religion. Should we assume that all women who wear skirts to submit to the constraints of old states who obeyed blindly patriarchal concepts of the Catholic Church, and therefore they are Catholic fundamentalists, who do not deserve to comment on feminist cause? it would be funny. and even if they did, they would have every right to comment on the feminist cause (and on any subject!). and yet it is the trial is being done towards the veil.

Personally, I make the distinction between Muslims and jihadists. If I chose my side in the psychological warfare that we are one sly, it does not stop me from treating others as I have always done in public. Because, as a democrat, I find it normal. And more reason, it would give a victory for jihad that unite all Muslims.

Admittedly, this is a realistic observation and "positive." But if we abandon this political fact for a moment that you husk with a sharpness too rare in political thinking, still does not he still a contradiction between women's emancipation and being eligible to remain in the religious affirmation of liberation? No monotheistic religion does not tolerate really feminist demands. It can be practiced without some contortions and feminist notional perfectly hypocritical. Or is that reinvents his religion on a personal level, which is in contradiction with "re-ligere. Every religion is pro-life and pro-herd. The individual is an idea, a word without reality in the mouth of a practitioner, and ideological freedom is not compatible with. Not that there is a religion more stupid than the others, just different states of acceptance by the progress of individual liberties in the West and elsewhere … So I would fully agree with your resume and less on Marx. So I would fully agree with your resume and less on Marx ladefense Muslim women supposedly feminist, and I am far from being aligned with Marxism in general …

I do not terrorism in the other direction, that addresses Islamophobic anyone who criticizes (in the sense argument against argument) Islam. As for those women, yes we are still at their side that's the criticism I address them: – Wearing the veil is placed anywhere in the Quran, the Muslims of France are mostly North Africans who have never worn the veil in France or in their countries of origin, veiling is therefore an expression of political Islam and committed. It raises the perennial problem of representation of Muslims. This group can speak in its name because it is not representative of Muslims or Islam … – They say the choice of abortion but point "is an acquired right, which is accurately recognized and codified in texts of Islamic reference. " What does that mean? they oppose the laws feminist / Republican who are not recognized by Islamic law? – they will be for the separation of men and. What does that mean? they oppose the laws feminist / Republican who are not recognized by Islamic law? – they will be for the separation of men and desfemmes in universities, swimming pools, hospitals, … current demands of the Muslims 'involved' – What is their position on Muslim countries that impose the veil on women, they can not ignore the reality of Islam that rightly cause an outcry here: the minority of veiled French are protected by the laws of the Republic but the majority of veiling in the Muslim world suffer. So once again I'm alongside all feminists without distinction, but there you arrive quickly at the edge of the thing …

oops … these stories are too long to read, but for me, browsing in the diagonal I realize there are a lot of Islamophobia in all this. By putting things in my view white woman's secular France from below, I admit be uncomfortable with women wearing the veil but he'll come to me any insult to the spirit of these women as in the cases described in these articles. Each his way of living, secular or religious! (Who am I to judge?) I am also sure that if I had the opportunity to speak with a veiled woman (from this and many other things, there's so much to share among women!) that this gene would disappear. Ignorance is certainly the cause of much misunderstanding. … In short I'm scared to see women's movements can also stigmatize violently veiled woman, while the latter they also fought-for freedom of women! "Will you, despite their veils, along with those. I'm scared to see women's movements can also stigmatize veiled woman violently, so that they are fighting themselves, also for the freedom of women! "Will you, despite their veils, along with the free cellesqui claim disposal of their bodies and the right to abortion? Give you just a little attention to what they have to say? "Yes, yes of course

I will always side with women and their rights! That is clear. But the veil is not and never will be a right to dispose of his body as abortion. Certainly not! Women do not have to be submitted! Women do not hide … NOTHING can justify it. However, wear a scarf over her hair and veil, this is not the same thing. But it can not be justified by religion.

very interesting, you let me take your links on R & S

>> "If Islamophobia is satisfied, therefore, ample room for a media storm stigmatizing the staging of repression, and a pseudo unanimity principle (of the extreme left to extreme right, all of agree to attack Islam, "the conceptual framework is biased, one wonders what is the rest of it? In fact, we can both ambient and Islamophobia invoqeer a claim of Marx" criticism of religion is the prerequisite to the review of the policy. "For example:>>" Will you, despite their veils, along with those who claim the free disposal of their bodies and the right to abortion? "The problem is not" to be with. "The claim of right to abortion is not" the right of free disposal of their bodies. "This includes the right to be veiled or not the right to challenge the patriarchal order of virginity imposed on women and not men, short of a moral sexual double. This included the right to be veiled or not, the right to challenge the patriarchal order of virginity imposed on women and not men, short of a moral sexual doublestandard. The right to contraception and Abortions should be supported wherever women deem necessary. We must also remember that this right is intensely political in that it is a right "of free inquiry" is not a right "requirement" but a "right-choice" in this sense offers q'uil women all that he denies the ongoing reform of Islam is confined to the limitation of the freedom of women (the Algerian family code, so-called obligation of the veil, etc. …)

First, because I know what it is … I had 3 pregnancies, 1 miscarriage and 2 children, and I learned very quickly, without testing. There will be my last year I did not feel very good, very tired, very emotional , of disgust, no rules yet, but I'm not the fateful day, and I do not bellyache as usual before the big landing … No significant pain in the chest, but breastfeeding as the youngest ever, there are mounted milk, then???? No contraception at the moment …..( I lost my two months ago IUD). And tell my husband withdrew just before … you know what! I had a negative pregnancy test, but as I said above 3 or 4 days before the arrival of the rules. Can a blood test done at this stage I be permitted to know more precisely, do you? To my 3 other pregnancies the rate of hcg after 1 month ranged from 50 to 54, very little. Thanks for your help Or is all this in my. Thanks for your help Or all this is in Matete ?….. The "interuptus coitus" is a temporary solution until my next appointment with the gynecological

Owa You had three pregnancies and for you to withdraw before ejaculation is a means of contraception?! Here I do not understand everything …. Blood test you'll be set.

Coitus interruptus is the least secure (and most annoying) of contraception.

Blood test unnecessary wait at least another week. Pending use of condoms is still more secure.