… you're shocked or not? In fact, I'm still my daughter who just turned 7 months. Not all day, just 3 feedings per day on average, to fall asleep for naps and at night, and morning awakening. I only ask this very practical: one starts two weeks in Sicily this summer, and I keep saying that breastfeeding may reduce the logistics, right? I know the past six months, some babies are breastfed, and I also know in advance that I will have thoughts of my family … What do you think? @ Chtonck: Like you, it has been natural from the first moment … In fact, I already cut, since I exclusively breastfed until her 5 months. For me as for her is a pleasure shared, but I do not want to endure unpleasant reflections, which are for my baby and me. My idea was to wean the way back from Sicily, it will have just 10 months. In retrospect, it's been great for a breastfed baby … @ Mamzelle: You've got it. When I was pregnant, I thought if I breastfeed. When I was pregnant, I thought if j'yarrivais breastfeed. It happened so naturally to her birth, I continued, without getting pressure over time. Today she is 7 months, and we love to find like that, especially in the morning, nap and dinner. It is a moment just for us. And yes, I have a twinge of regret when I think about weaning. Thank you for your answers. I will continue to do as I please. If I had not heard, I would never have breastfed, I would have left her crying at night to "do his lungs," I should have stuck to the nursery to his two months, and full Other things I do not feel me.

age is roughly where my boys are weaned himself as great, and it suited me. Of course, there had to "suffer" reactions family "but you're going to breastfeed when ????" "Ben, I wean them before they go do their military service … or perhaps on the eve of their wedding night, why?" it's me "shocked" no, it's not the right word … say that it seems strange to see a child who walks to breastfeed … For me, there is nursing a baby, outside, a walking child is no longer a baby, in my imagination … I have not breastfeed because "it was good," not because the who decided he needed to, but because I am a mammal, and I instinctively ran … and I imagine that the lionesses and / or louvers do not extend beyond the breastfeeding period "baby" of their young, they the "convent" and nourish the time it takes, then they become self I have somewhat the same mindset

it does not shock me, everyone does as he wants. moreover, the cost is more convenient, so do not hesitate. after, this is "weird" when the baby becomes more independent and therefore less baby, but I think it's mainly due to lack usual addition: I meant "for the spot," Freudian slip;)

My daughter is 10 months old today and is still breastfed. It is therefore clear that it does not shock me to see a 9 month old breastfed. For the family, I had no particular reflection outside my grandmother told me "T'allaites yet? But you're mad? Well, after all, it's your body and your baby you do what you want ". If you have any thoughts, shows the economics of breastfeeding (more than 20 € box of milk, do you have make, savings in 9 months). That is a very "earthy" but one who works best facing the anti-long feedings. "Logistically, no bottles, no water, no heater bib find full ride … It's clear that it relieves!

normally since he didn't your baby reaches 12 months you can continue breastfeeding him there is no richer in vitamins than milk from his mother and protects it from any disease if you can continue breastfeeding is well but if you decide to stop it as well because it goes to 07 months he started to eat.

Whether or not it offends others, it is not their problem. It is your choice and your relationship with your daughter. We should not bear the thought of your family, but rather ask them keep their thoughts to themselves and let you raise your daughter as you want (more or less depending on the person diplomacy and your mood). There is one thing to say is you mom, you decide when to wean your daughter! if she does not decide for you …

Madam, it is unnecessary shame to breastfeed a baby of 7 months. Today, medicine has realized the rewarding properties of breastfeeding, which is the best food for babies! WHO encourages breastfeeding until 2 years, many doctors recommend up to 12 months, so you may notice that in both cases, it is advisable to breastfeed as long as possible. I am a mom-and support you!

I'm still my spitz, it is 11 months. But it does more than head at night and morning for several months now, so that nobody sees me do. I never talk about breastfeeding with my entourage, I've taken enough of reflections in the mouth. If asked, I tell the truth, but we do ask myself almost never …. To believe that it is unimaginable to be nursing a baby of that age. When people have the misfortune to have me thoughts, I send them a walk, Yen tired! If you want to breastfeed, continues, do not stop because you're afraid of what people will think or say. And I am ure that if you give him a bottle, the yen will have at least one to tell you: "ha you not breastfeed …"

I breastfeed my daughter who will be 2 years in a few days. Yes, it's great practice. When we went to Morocco this summer, she was cured in two days of heavy diarrhea due to change of food and she was 13 months. This has not to bother the shot for food the rest of the stay. Practice also to sleep at night. The reflections of the family, you do not care, your daughter always comes first. The WHO recommends breastfeeding until 22 months of age and exclusively up to 6 months. The good thinking that you say it's time to switch to growing up milk, you ask them to pay you the bottles of milk for growth, then we produce milk free of growth, milk that fits children and much better still. In many countries, breastfeeding is done during the first 2 years of life of children. I think it's in the Nordic countries that begins diversification than 9 months of the child. Finally, I do not know exactly in which country, but I read that somewhere.. I find it easier instead to breastfeed beyond 6 months that the first 6 months. Indeed, the first 6 months, breastfeeding is difficult to implement. It was only later that everything runs smoothly, then what standard would need to stop after a fierce battle to keep it for six months and when it works best? In addition, the older the child, the more he understands the need to wait, you can not breastfeed anywhere, anyhow, so it can not breastfeed in front of fools. @ Siam: 100% agree with you. lol A few months ago, I phoned one of my cousins who approach their sixties. And while chatting, I told him that my daughter still head. She said: "Encore!" exclaiming, I expected a reflection of the style will have to stop thinking "and not bin. She said: "Ah, well, comment me, I sucked up my 3 years, I liked it" with a touch of nostalgia in her voice. O)

There is nothing more natural than to breastfeed her child until he is no longer wanted (if he eats something else of course, eh …), contrary to what you may say a bunch of shrinks to two bullets, fierce feminist, or other heirs of the bottle … You do well as you want it, if you want to continue to breastfeed, do not deprive most of the happiness and the health benefit! And no, 10 months is not "great" … It's still a baby … until at least 3 years: yeah, what is the age to which manufacturers of infant formula milk recommended giving special children … There's no reason not to follow the same logic with breast milk!

It does not shock me at all because I breastfed my daughter 21 months. Frankly, I do not see where the problem is, anyway, in France, when t'allaites more than 3 months is considered odd (and, paradoxically, a mother who does not breastfeed at birth that is not seen too much …). My partner was supporting me and other people's opinions m'indifférait completely.

my mother made us all breastfeeding for about 2 years. it seems that it's good for the baby's health.

You want to continue to breastfeed, do it. Never mind what e think your family or anyone else.

my baby is 15month and tjrs breastfeed than within! and I intend to continue until I have longer than milk! )

It depends on what perspective you get seats. When my daughter was born, I did not believe that breastfeeding a toddler walking. I breastfed her, was both loved it. And then the days have passed, it will be 3 years old and still head. At the time, breastfeeding 9 months it seemed huge, crazy. Today it just seems completely normal to breastfeed "yet" her 9-month. It is not great for a breastfed baby, on the contrary, it is very small for me … Today, babies breastfed longer than 6 months, there are more and more. What shocks me by cons is to forego that pleasure shared and benefactor just to avoid any comments, remarks because although it has done, whether on breastfeeding, the age of diversification, the selection nursery / nanny / house brand of stroller, choosing shoes, etc. … As you say so, it only affects you and your baby. And then, at worst, if you do not feel prepared to assume no one has to know that you are breastfeeding. And then, at worst, if you do not feel prepared to assume no one has to know that you allaitesencore. And the other way? Do you continue to breastfeed while you just do not want just to avoid having to bear the unpleasant thoughts of an entourage that advocated breastfeeding? Never mind that breastfeeding 2 days or 3 years, the key is to enjoy the game and everyone is benefiting, as baby mama. Weans if you feel like you. Weans if your daughter wants. Weans do not because the others want or because "it's done." I'm wrong or you feel that your words and you have absolutely no desire to wean and you are looking for excuses to continue a little longer. Frankly logistics when we share in Sicily … There are baby formula and water bottles as easily as in France and 3 bibs that takes up no space. It's a bogus excuse! At us you can tell! ^ ^ Seriously, just listen to your heart with Mom, you sèvres or not. To have no regrets, in one way or another, you do what you want, not what others would like you to do.

It does not shock me, my daughter took in up to 10 months and a half and I did not care much for remarks that could make me. It was she who refused the breast abruptly if I continued to breastfeed with pleasure. I got to: "what? You still breastfeeding?" and saw the look I threw it stopped me bathe with it lol. If it's your choice to continue and that your smart mind, well pleased with you not take the head.

I breastfed my son until 9 months, morning and evening, and he ate purees, sauces and dairy products for lunch and snack! there is no deadline for breastfeeding! so enjoy

I dream that I was breastfeeding my niece's son who is 1 year. He laughed and was very much pleased by sucking

and what is the question yacine tell me?

but it all say it's fantastic to see, and the question is??

Well yes! He must know that the release of this book "Sex in the Vatican" a new survey on sulfur below the Holy See: testimonials, descriptions of scenes and dialogues transcribed unimaginable. A unique story that took him (the author) of the Eternal City to South America, revealing the most shameful secrets: sexual abuse of nuns abortions, hidden through the checks to buy the Vatican Silence of the offspring of mothers with church! Carmelo Abbate is editor of the "news" Panorama, a newspaper investigation in Italy most prescribers. It reveals the abuse, evidence in support! During 2010, the author of this book has gotten into the middle of gay priests in Rome; About exceed the issue of gay priests and, of course, the vicissitudes of the Roman clergy to embrace the difficult and often-painful-questions posed by the celibacy of priests,. The purpose exceed the issue of gay priests and, of course, the vicissitudes of the Roman clergy to embrace the difficult-and often painful-questions posed by the celibacy of priests, levoeu chastity and abuse committed within the same the church around the world. Some scenes may shock the lecteur.Les testimony of clergymen on their sex life are rare, they were then reproduced intégralement.Ce which tends to denounce this document is not people but the culture of secrecy that exists within the church and the presence of two value codes: one for those who are part and another for the rest of the world! Read this! While we do not tell me that the Pope is healthy! he closes his eyes above. The truth finally comes out with the author. And you have Cathos you read this book? you read it? or else you'll still go there on in not believing! @ The thumbs down must come from Catholics, accounts shading I guess!

In short, it's like everywhere, then? That reassures me: the cathos are "normal."

We do not know everything, it's a very closed environment, it certainly things happening not very Catholic, I just know that the Vatican is a state and is the richest in the world! I wonder what they make all that money!

Nissan hello yes, but the secret is jealously guarded by the ecclesiastical authorities of Vatican.Pour not to sow confusion and suspicion among Catholic believers.

Yeah, it's the same as what is happening in Mecca, in TJ or other … Except that the Catholic Church let them talk without threatening to kill or harass

Satan is the god of this world, the Father of Lies Jesus said that the occult is everywhere obscures the truth and light

http://www.gondrand-opusdei.org/ A +

>> "We must know that the release of this book" Sex in the Vatican "a new survey on sulfur below the Holy See: testimonials, descriptions of scenes and dialogues transcribed unimaginable. A single story" A story without the names of interviewees, without places and without having informed the interviewees that it was an interview for a book or an investigation. There is therefore no evidence some interviews are conducted by mail and it was therefore no evidence that the author is well-mails he claims to be the ecclesiastical Already a view of journalism ethics, this problem. The author claims to have gathered confidence and not giving the names to not put his interlocutors in trouble and not risk a trial by the ECAR. However, given his previous book "The crazy nights of gay priests," he began to be known in the church, enough to have no chance to gather secrets. In. Dansson previous book, any more names or evidence, but a big bestseller. All we can say, is that these "wild nights" assumed a budget that has no priest. On the other hand, when we have conclusive evidence, it wins its lawsuit against the ECAR as has been shown pedophile scandals. Thus, the statement>> The truth finally comes out with the author. "Purely propaganda. All we can say is that the guy has opened a new literary genre: the "ecclesiastical porn" which is salivating Muslim Forum and the TJ. Saying that "it is an investigation on sulfur Vatican," it sells. Dan Brown also claimed that his book said "the truth" when he had plagiarized an earlier work of Baigent and a book by Gerard de Sede and the rest was purely fictional, and borrowed this fabulous Plantard And I remind you that I am not Catholic and therefore I have nothing to defend there. I. I look unhappy with how the author is promoting his bouqin.

Nissan Hello, I was not aware of this book it is obvious that the Vatican does not expose to light all the abuses that occur within it not holy! .. You see I would say that truth comes from God, who has served the author to reveal these facts and inform people. Dan 2:22 "He (Jehovah) who reveals the things deep and hidden things, who knows what is in darkness and really light dwells with him." God always uses those it needs to carry out his plan. Nissan kisses, Liz-Love.

I have not read the book and did not want to read it; What good? No Catholic believes that priests are not like other men. The Bible says: "There is not a right, not one." Moreover, what really shocked me, this was the case of pedophilia, for obvious reasons. The rest is between adults, so the decision is between them and God … The reporter has marked its move, the Catholic church, for good or evil, passion, apparently.

Bjr darling ♥ Yes indeed there are many books that I am bought and frankly it's a little disgusting, hidden faces are exposed in this book, everything is explained and when everyone will realize that this state of affairs are they going to go well to clean! Frolics between priests are even inside the church! Kisses to you and Princess Liz. ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥

@ Liz ♥ ♥ B-Love Ayita In all honesty, there's no hiding that the Vatican's famous business … http://www.tj-encyclopedie.org/Liste_des_affaires_de_p% C3% A9dophilie_chez_les_T% C3% A9moins_de_J% C3% A9hovah … because NO, I say no religion is free of such abuses! Wishing you a very good read!

They are far from being honest on the contrary

Catholics are to judge their pedophile priests, in apocalyptic cults jehovah witnesses he protects pedophiles: 25000 cases reported. To believe that the sect made its first specialty: is it their good word?

Why?

For. A woman has the right to decide what it does to her body as "accidents" and rape does exist. And until the fetus has reached a certain age, this is nothing but a heap cell virtually inert. @ Gwellat: you're aware that there is no 100% effective contraceptive?

For, as women have the freedom to do what they want with their bodies and whether to have a child … SasouW @ ': A rape or an accident? What other scenarios, you know?

Pros and cons. I am for when it comes to rape or accident, or I am totally against … @ Ingsoc: Some people will abort because they found a disability in their children (and that's not a rape or an accident) and they do not want a disabled child.

katch good, you do not think al question been asked a thousand times? is an endless debate, because some are in the emotion, and others in pragmatism, a part of the experience and another unknown … like gift! Next time, do it yourself eh http://fr.answers.yahoo.com/search/search_result; _ylt = AuKHSelYGKU4b1fyVwpv_N5hAgx;. _ylv = 3? = p abortion & orderby = rank & page = 2

For, because many pregnancies are unwanted, and the woman has the right to enjoy unhindered … So long live abortion and contraception … Women have the right to dispose of their bodies as they wish …

Each case is different … For a woman violated biensur I am for!

Tough question! I am neither for nor against it depends on the circumstances, the woman in question, his situation …!

@ Jeremy Ingsoc, women do not do what they want with their bodies since they are made engrosées without agreeing to when I would be completely "fathers" will be obliged to attend the butcher the surgery lol!

You see it there 's 10 years (period I know), it was very frowned upon to have an abortion. The misfortune of one was the wickedness of others … women were poorly treated in some hospitals, I find it very sad .. they do not seek to understand, but preferred to try .. Now there is a lot less judgmental, but unfortunately the act has become so common routine for many gynecologist, I can not find this normal in some cases. A girl of childbearing age should be aware of reports on all aspects of love. In short, I am for but this should not be a means of contraception.

Freedom of choice but a nasty reality … the less traumatic, less than 6 weeks, with medication. But late abortions beyond 12 weeks as 24 weeks in England, it makes me a bit wrong with that .. seems better and give birth under X "sad" reality I mean

The controversial issue without balanced development, it is tiresome to strength … It is absurd to be cons. Every woman has the right to decide if she wants to become a mother. Motherhood should be a choice, not a punishment (a punishment because the mother was not responsible enough not to protect themselves from pregnancy for example). A child need not be the punishment for his irresponsible mother. It must be really wanted.

I am neither for nor against, but I'm all for freedom of opportunity to use it safely without going abroad or be butchered on the kitchen table to the knitting needle … because otherwise, we must stop believing that abortion is considered a method of contraception (those who really believe are some ridiculously tiny) because a forgotten pill (a pill or vomited. vomited medication = not take medication), a squeaky hood, a coil that moves, it happens … pregnancies as well as contraceptive also arrive, no contraception is 100% reliable, except abstinence (but unlike religion, we did not vow of chastity) because pregnancies from rape, it also exists (although the fear of STIs would make me more pinball than pregnancy, at first blush) thank you to the 343 bitches, thank you to Simone

There's too much abuse! This is not ume method of contraception. Having the choice is one thing, take the opportunity to be irresponsible not! Women who really need aborted occur in the same bag as fools, this is not normal!

This is not to be "for" or "cons" there has always been and always will be, at all latitudes. From time immemorial, women have sought the means to not be slaves to their ovaries and human negligence. The legalizing this practice did not explode the number of abortions, it just allowed that is framed and done properly, avoiding women maimed or killed on kitchen tables. So yes, I am for the fact that it can take place without putting lives at risk and recognizing women's right to choose, since there will in any way, whether legal or not.

I am cons in my case, I respect life but I will fight if necessary to ensure that women who have no other solution can abort! Needless to manufacture unhappy future. With that, the girls are contraception, eh?

I'm for it but should not be a trivial matter because some women abuse it and do not even take the pill or abortions and rarely go shopping as I do not say it is not true because I know unfortunately j am ashamed for her and the fetus did not ask it gets horrible in these cases should be re précis.Il prevention His penny I think I'm W @ avs in school and I can tell you that abortion because we expect a disabled child is quite justifiable for lifetime care of a disabled child is something very poignant difficult and not everyone is psychologically able to do this even if his own child so stop having judge as simplistic and intolerant on an important subject.

Before, I was cons. One day I got pregnant with my boyfriend of youth, it was 16 years, it was an accident, the guy was the most con world, I had to abort the papers but there was a miscarriage, so in some cases for! It must not be selfish and think about the child;)

Personally I am against! Now everything is relative, I think that is a good reason to terminate a pregnancy, especially between 3 and 4 months is beyond a crime

if it comes to outright rape or incest idem in cases of illness for the mother … cons by post if the chick c aborted x times then I'm okay, not the hoods c for dogs, so I am willing to an accident, but two and not three or four … I know I say not like that story … so after talking must stop whining because c poor kids are left with mothers older than them guerent, c crazy … may need to be c … responsibilities and stop fucking in every sense and with the first coming .. or else I do not see where is the problem of keeping the baby if you are with the man you love. .. god gives us a gift, why get rid of them while another pays dear for the privilege of one day being mom …

I'm pretty cons, who had 3 miscarriages (2 months to half -3 months) and had great difficulty in having children. It's such a chance to have a child! Moreover, if we do not want, there are good contraceptive. I think you can ask women to be reasonable and consistent if they do not want children. It's a little different for very young girls. These teenage pregnancies are a tragedy and I am rather for abortion in this case.

I'm for it when the story of three weeks but beyond the heart beats and the child feels his death so I am cons at this time

Alongside these new measures of valuation and protection of the family, we commit ourselves to ask the French, by referendum at the end of five years, to promote a modern nation concerned about respecting human dignity by writing in the texts , who base their existence and development, the sanctity of life and affirmation of the human right to be legally protected from conception to natural death. Be legally protected from conception to natural death?? And what about abortion and euthanasia? Jean-Philippe http://www.frontnational.com/?page_id=1116 A: Exactly, I inquire. Speaking of "sanctity of life from conception" it means what it means. 49.3 A King: 15000 miners annually. It's huge, I agree. But what should we do? Leave all these little girls at birth because they did not have the means or the lucidity to take contraceptives? Pawn A: Of course, when Marine said something to believe, right?. But what should we do? Leave all these little girls at birth because they did not have the means or the lucidity to take contraceptives? Pawn A: Of course, when Marine said something to believe, right? Anyway, there is not a concern to do, she will never pass. I just wanted to open a few eyes of lovers of Marine who drink his words and do not even want to read his program.

I'm for abortion. And I think the moms should have Zantiracistes practice more often!

Your boyfriend would vote Le Pen, however … http://fr.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110308113842AAmnb5B

No anti-abortion from the FN. The Front is a realistic, which is that the number of abortions has remained stable, but the number of abortions performed on minors is increasing. The Front National simply demonstrates that no alternative is proposed against abortion. While many married couples can adopt, without an administration without logic, have automatically give abortion without even thinking if we can borrow another solution .. In no case had been talk of abolishment of abortion, which would be ridiculous, but to propose alternatives in office opportunities. Listen! Learn properly! Take Action! MARINE2012!

At the end of quinquénat because Navy wants to promote family and ESPECIALLY provide alternatives to abortion because women are only too often, abandoned or even rejected. If this works politicals they get to put an end to 200 000 children killed each year, humanity will have taken a big step. This is an ambitious because of population aging and low birth in France. As you can see it impose anything ety propose a referendum. You are against popular democracy?

Being against the death penalty, I have a little trouble on abortion. In any case, I fully recognize the right to abortion. I'm just scared of abortion statistics: the vast majority (I have the exact%) occurs due to the abscence of means of contraception …

We read the same thing, but thou hast that are still able to deny the obvious … Note that the phrase is deliberately convoluted in order to precisely interpret …

@ King: on the contrary, 75% of women who have abortions each year are contraceptives. What is abhérent instead is to note that while more women taking the pill 9 out of 10 admit one or more omissions in the previous 6 months, it remains the method of contraception almost systematically offered at first, then there are many that are better suited for women who forget to take it (especially the IUD, which is still denied by the majority of nulliparous gynécos, when nothing indicates its use-cons! )

He can always wrap it in beautiful paper, abortion is forbidden because "protecting life from conception …" it's the same thing in more light. The irony of restoring the death penalty. Very logical and soon it all that? http://www.leparisien.fr/international/usa-le-dakota-veut-excuser-le-meurtre-des-medecins-pratiquants-l-ivg-16-02-2011-1318391.php

it is true that this is a concession to the Catholic party, their values are and should be respected but nothing will be done outside a popular referendum, the FN is the party of France and French, such a decision can not be taken against the advice of the Nation. So no questioning of the right to abortion without a referendum, but admit that this issue is very minor in France in 2011 crippled by debt, unemployment and crime. If you prefer to vote for crooks and traitors for the reason that there will be no referendum on abortion is that you do not really live the life of the vast majority of French

oh no it's not dangerous … but if you want to redo thee butcher's guts, it's a good idea not to take birth control … (It annoys me, but it annoys the irresponsible)

actually it is very dangerous because you have sex does not only sets a new design (pregnant again) but there are risks of infectious diseases so watch out if you want your health

This is not dangerous but totally irresponsible. It is still not that hard to take a contraceptive, especially since it is a choice .. However abortion is not one. Even if you can not keep a baby that you do not want, this does not prevent you from nab disease. We still live in a society where it is readily available means of contraception. Before sleeping with anyone, anytime, you would have done better to go to school to learn to write.

I read you saying "once it did not suffice him" …

poor idiot who does not understand life

well yes … Moreover, it is risky at any time ….

unprotected? seriously? You tfais abortion and you do that again unprotected sex? Y'as something wrong with you?

An abortion is not nothing! It's become a life as you stop. Obviously for you it was not an accident but the bullshit! I hate you?

Dangerous I do not know, rather unconscious, right?

dangerous not so irresponsible. Abortion is not contraception!!

Troll

After abortion or not, Having unprotected sex is ALWAYS IRRESPONSIBLE AND SOMEWHAT DANGEROUS!

yes, because you risk having a baby troll … or otherwise, you'll have an abortion again, and this can make you sterile, and you can not have babies anymore trolls.

Dangerous in what sense? Being pregnant, having a child (something wonderful): that's the danger? It was not the same concept of danger, but if that's the danger for you: yes, you're in danger! That's okay, it will only the second time that precede the next time and so on … What unconsciousness! What crap! Next time think a bit (if you can, if it's something you can do)!

for me it was spicy, it was not for me it was bad but it gave collic horrible to my baby.

Onions, cabbage, garlic, but it is best to ask a pediatrician.

Vodka-orange, rat poison, ecstasy and all that belongs to these families. For the rest, make yourself happy. Well, if you listen to the doctors, as you remove everything that is not ultra pasteurized and industrialized (raw milk, meats, veggies, etc. …)

You avoid sage and parsley too large quantities because they are deemed to reduce lactation. You obviously banned alcohol. Anything you drink will pass into your milk. So if you want to drink, plan an alternative (milk drawn in advance infant formula) until the alcohol has left your body. Apart from that, you can eat whatever you want. Even the spicy, garlic and others. You'll see if your baby likes your milk tastes with these or not and then you adapt. Some foods may have effects on your baby but it will be up to you on a case by case basis. My daughter, for example, has an intolerance to cow's milk proteins. If I drink or eat too many products made from cow's milk, she suffers from severe colic, gassy and very green stool. So I substituted goat's milk cheeses and goat and sheep, and since then nothing. But it's pretty rare for a baby to this intolerance so do not worry.

I do not think there is bad food … instead he must eat everything from a balanced manner. The spices are not harmful, India or Mexico, people are accustomed to eating a lot spicier than here, nursing mothers, too, it's just a culture thing.

I understand the need to always eat healthy and do not drink alcohol but I wonder if the food can cause listeriosis are still to avoid: meat, raw milk cheeses, smoked salmon, foie gras … me at seeing my daughter eat absolutely everything. I watch how she reacts. She ate curry (masala kind of) and his son had buttons so be careful …. Avoid alcohol and tea or coffee are excite … The woman has an increased need during breastfeeding, there is an increased demand for vitamins and minerals (calcium) and sufficient to cope with a balanced diet: A protein intake of 60-80 g / d ( 10-15% of total energy) A fat intake of 80 g / d (30 to 35% of energy requirements); A carbohydrate intake of 340 g / l (50 to 55% of energy needs). A maximum milk intake of 750 ml / d. is recommended as a milk or dairy products: cheeses, yogurts, etc.. It allows in particular to cover the calcium requirements that are. It allows in particular to cover the calcium requirements that are of 1,200 mg / day in lactating women. A sufficient amount of liquid (at least 1.5 liter / day) is recommended. That said, the nursing mother can eat what she wants! This is no time for her to start a diet. women go greedy, greedy women go to your spoons … food … do not be afraid! GONTRAN IS HERE TO PROTECT …. _________________

Firstly avoid all that spicy and the beans, cabbage, pepper

spices, soft drinks and pasta.

Hello, I would like to have accurate information about dietary diversification babies. My son will be 6 months 3 weeks and I'm seriously considering. I already know that it must be done gradually to taste fruits and vegetables when cooked but it is the real meal? Faur is what first give it a real meal for lunch on continuing milk (breast) morning and evening? From when should it be "real" lunch and dinner? Can I continue to breastfeed in the morning and by 4 pm? Does my milk will be nourishing enough still? What questions than questions! : D Thanks in advance for your answers!

If you are breastfeeding your child, do not you take the lead. A breastfed baby is not likely to be deficient, although not diverse. I am repeating myself, but diversification is only used to discover new flavors to the baby. A breastfed baby has already experienced a range of flavors, thanks to its mother's milk, whose taste changes according to what she eats. So it may be that your baby is ready no interest in diversification. Purees it may seem completely uninteresting. You can try, but you'll see for yourself. Often the baby is interested in the food much later. In my case, my daughter is really putting it to 9 months. There is nothing abnormal. Mommy's milk is better than all that. Breastmilk adapts and then your baby will ration it needs to complete. Breast milk is always nutritious. I would say that it does no good to rush. Let your baby discover for himself and expects it claims for itself. There will come a well. He will arrive well unjour where your baby will dig into your plate to taste himself.

I complete response Sibline for technical details. Diversification does not mean withdrawal. The milk should remain the main food for your child for several months. The solids that you can give will be complementary, especially since he is breastfed. There will be no "real" meal for several weeks. You keep feedings as before, on demand, and you just add solids at mealtimes. First in a meal, then 2, etc. … With priority milk solids. Ideally, your son should decide when it will no longer need to suck for lunch or at another time. And yet it is also ideally your son should decide whether or not solids (by reaching out to what you eat for example). My own daughter began calling to 8 months. Your milk will still be quite nutritious. A child within may well be satisfied only breast milk until 9 or 12 months without the risk of deficiencies. By cons, if you delete the. By cons, if you delete destétées at this age unless it comes from your son, your lactation will necessarily decrease, which will be less the case in a few months. Trust your little man and everything will be fine.

I'll live, it makes me a little scared .. Is there a fee? For ceu are cons before me "insult", know that I am cons but there are also some situations where it is better to do instead of making a child ke unfortunately without Dad. Yes I know there are things to avoid getting there, I have no ECU but please do not judge me. Thank you.

it goes bad for the fetus, unfortunately.

So it does not pay but you pay a fee to the hospital and i you are a minor you have to be accompanied by an adult but you do not pay taxes or not the transaction I wish you luck for the following

It's stupid to be against something and do it anyway. But it's even more to denigrate someone who performs an abortion when it is right (and increasingly it is better than a child that abortion does not really want or we will raise under poor conditions). Brief. I give you the website of Planned Parenthood, which will explain everything: http://www.planning-familial.org/themes/theme03-avortement/index.php

To explain how it happens, we should know what you'll experience: a medical abortion or curettage. These are two very different methods.

it all depends on the pregnancy I am afraid to live it too, because in certain situations deserve better than to suffer or even give birth to a being who will not be unhappy or everything he needs … in short .. Swiss in his six days up to 6 can have an abortion by medication, it takes 3 pills and two days after it returns to take one last pill and remain under observation until the expulsion! curettage and I am sorry not much information! courage at least for this event!

it depends, drug or medical?

the fact you're too easy. you say be against abortion even when you are concern. if you really cons alor no exception for you

well

It happens to be murder, it means that your whole life you do not deliver thee, if you do not want your baby you can possibly give to another person who can not have, its hard because you will regret not to know but at least it will survive and who knows maybe he will become successful adults and thank the stranger who gave him the gift of life … certainly in both cases you ' will not take your act, but know that the excuses for not having a father these days it's more an excuse for children have been created with the sperm bank and another lost their early …

because there has yet to be against abortion? woe ..

Yes, for young girls. An error or oversight can happen and it is a life wasted. But it's not just girls, think of protecting yourself. Yes also in cases of rape or risk pregnancies (a malformed child) Bravo to continue asking questions in French, that's how you'll make progress.