when Christians who have these values, which respect the most values of the church: gay marriage ban no abortions no no global world order ect. @ Father sifleur but concern for foreign aid, the poor, the destitute, rejection, are Christian values, and left!

hummm I think the extreme right … BOUTIN girlfriend or whatever is found.

Christians vote right or extreme right.

Yes, far-right Christian Democratic Party or Christine Boutin. @ Whistler Father is adamant again, but there are Christians on the left as there are Christians on the right.

the FN and the MPF.

((((((( NO ONCE IN POWER THEY HOLD their promises !!!)))))) PARTY FOR ME I VOTE FOR CONS!

In which country do I live knowing that I am against abortion, euthanasia, drugs, alcohol, excision, arranged marriage, prostitution?

on the moon

The paradise. Lol.

going to Saudi Arabia if you want all this to be imposed on others

Hard drive on this earth. you can at least imagine the country of dreams. @: Kat Woman: Can you clarify your thoughts? You mean what? Presidential elections of 21 December ….. ?

it not nalready

A little patience and you will be very happy in France from 2012 ….!!! @ Flower … so I think the FN could easily meet such requirements …

Thy kingdom is not of this world …;-)

Is not women decide? or rather, each woman? By what right a man can decide his ban? as rightists in the 70s? Is not that disgusting?

Whatever the opinions of others.

You still have to explain to young women that abortion is NOT a contraceptive. Abortion is a traumatic operation and should be practiced only as a last resort and especially without delay.

This is obviously not up to him. But see the case he dreams of being a father … but yes it does exist, it will try to persuade his girlfriend, we understand that. Once I do an abortion or abortion was a crime we were talking about abortionist … this time not so long ago and people still consider it a crime and would like to impose their beliefs on others .. Besides few services do hospitals and many are going abroad.

Precisely because they are men ………. And machismo still reigns almost by atavism! So it is for or against the woman who is master of his stomach and should remain in any case a man must decide for us! and those who are backward and cons are suffering from acute obscurantism! PS not that right-wingers of the 70s sorry! The MLF had its militant leftists v bcp as we say today "! PS2 and I'll remember it the right to vote that made the abortion law to free Ms. Veil and Giscard who tremendously supported! "I like that does not distort the facts or history

I think that man should not impose its decision. But the woman either. If the "father" wants to keep the child, is his right, and I find it disgusting on the part of the girl have an abortion anyway. Conversely, if the "mother" wants to keep her unborn child is just as disgusting on the part of man to force her to abort. It must be a mutual decision. Aty, be less aggressive, you might think you want to exclude men of any decision "because they are just men." Is ambiguous, be careful. Moreover, whether or not your point of view, we must consult the man and woman in this kind of decision. Now, ethically speaking, it is also a right. A man would not have the right to condemn this practice, but if a woman? If this man is disgusted by abortion, it is his opinion, point bar. Same thing for a woman. As is their right to believe in God or not. After, we must know the difference between defending his point of view, and impose his point of view …

really?? they do have the right to have an opinion on the pretext that they are men?? and can be put aside a certain Mary there is a little more than 2010 years to a woman is pregnant must be a man.

it is for the woman should return the decision to abort or not, anyway, the desire for children that are living in two. but ultimately that is the body of the woman and her child that it 's act. that is difficult enough in this question if we add more moral judgments that is hell.

Women adulterers stoned here, same-sex marriages performed there, sanctioned pedophilia, excision traditional trivialized sexual harassment, drug use is authorized, the concept of terrorism, surrogate mother, abortion, euthanasia. …. so what do you think? ditto on the Internet: Censorship and the words or images allowed a country to another? **** example rather nondescript word American is always a keyword automatically censored but the "con" the Marseillaise? PS some do not even read the question? it is absolutely not a question of DSK but more comprehensive approaches to countries around the world.

strauss khan is the archetype of the worst bourgeois bastard! a true socialist somehow!

DSK once said "For me, it is not proper for a minister to continue performing its mission, so there exists a suspicion against him resulting in a judicial proceeding, the risk of undermining the entire Government. " Whether guilty or not even the problem is gone, our politicians represent our country, they must lead by example and be above reproach. They embody the values of our Nation! At least hope that this case will give the last record straight …

it is true that there is a serious ethical problem worldwide but ………….. impossible to solve ……… each not having the same sense of things ………. extensive debate ………..

This is not the global society is at stake but the French company acquiesced DSK many years without saying anything. Many French women had already sounded the alarm but France did nothing. Otherwise they are foreigners who are in our place.

I do not think less. The deputy of Paris, who posted a note on his blog Sunday strongly criticized the left, says Dominique Strauss-Kahn has already attacked in the past other maids in the same New York hotel.

DSK epitomizes totalitarian dictatorship in the French style, rich men, contemptuous of the people, and rotten to the moelle.le government revoke a teacher who made an honest debate on abortion, but protects a serial rapist, thank you the American justice to get rid of this monster and thereby protect those who could be his future victims. And a little compassion for those who have little to be aborted because of this junk

Simulation of a victory FN: A few million immigrants in less and it is dramatic. Immigration puts pressure on wages: why a boss he would increase the salary of a French if the immigrant takes what he finds? Trichet said recently, raising wages would be the worst thing to do in this period fragile post-crisis, we must control our costs of production: do not raise wages and hire Mohammedans. A devaluation of 20 to 25% of our currency to boost exports and it is dramatic. In the unlikely event that our trading partners do not say anything when you flood their domestic markets with cheaper Made in France since devalued, our imports will no matter what price increase 20% to 25% and therefore our production costs increase (more expensive raw materials, machine tools more expensive and take longer to absorb), we will not win as competitive as that … Anyway, our trading partners do not allow themselves, they. In the unlikely event that our trading partners do not say anything when you flood their domestic markets with cheaper Made in France since devalued, our imports will no matter what price increase 20% to 25% and therefore our production costs increase (more expensive raw materials, machine tools more expensive and take longer to absorb), we will not win as competitive as that … Anyway, our trading partners will not let themselves do ilsprendront protectionist measures in return, nullifying our advantage competitive export (but still important at higher cost …) And that's part of the iceberg! I do not even talk about their positions on the death penalty (for) or abortion rights (against). A victory of the FN is not desirable, then I will vote for the PS (if not the UMP is not in the 2nd round).

PS If you vote then you praise the right has always been, you're a false Derche first …

well I'd like you Never in my life I would vote FN

Get out the head of water, and stops to see the part of the iceberg …

but you really start to crap your pants at the UMP @ Miney: You should read the entire text, not the title

you have some strange theories. how many countries "euro" are "bankruptcy" or in the red and this will continue. after Greece, Ireland, Portugal, Spain it will be France.

Good! you go back in my opinion ….

Thank you! It reassures me that there are still sensible people like you.

maintains a fhaineux starting to think about the economic ideas of marinated sow when you really open your eyes you will understand that you are a ballot for the interests of political hacks who will sell you the soup that you like the moments its aid to be in power

pout … FN proposes neither more nor less than the same ideas in Switzerland ….. who is doing not too bad yet …

http://actu.orange.fr/france/presidentielle-marine-le-pen-en-tete-au-1er-tour-sarkozy-et-ps-au-coude-a-coude_108347.html

you do not too wet. It seems that the ps will be very difficult lollll

Following the responses referring to the fact that this is not a baby, and there is no conscience, one may ask: What is the difference between abortion and murder of an adult "not conscious "asleep or unconscious? in both cases the victim "is not conscious." but does that justify murder?

I think not as they die … Einstein @ can not be a baby but still a human being alive … And … @ Kowai you know that? Evidence to the contrary? Although in the minds of proponents of the culture of death that. If I burn my hand I want you to prove you wrong … But you want one? Doctors have said previously abortionists. We kill the baby in the womb of his mother made desperate efforts to escape the deadly vacuum … @ Boudou you're to be pitied. A pregnant woman says she is expecting a baby … the heart beats at 3 weeks …

? What baby? At this stage it is called a fetus, not a baby.

It is an embryo before 12 weeks and it did not even realize what is happening. Demeter proves me wrong.

Issue-oriented or not ….. FYI, women abort an embryo that is to say the outline of a human being who is far from the constitution of a baby so caution in appellation given that you do not mind ……

At the time of abortion, human embryo that looks suspiciously like chicken! The baby does after birth!

What is the difference between abortion and murder of an adult "not aware" asleep or unconscious? I want to say out of context question, since there is someone who sleeps up completely so that when a woman aborts, she miscarried a baby but not an embryo! Ie at this stage there is no sensation possible. There's not even the cells which detect cold hot node, the pain of comfort, etc … And I am absolutely against the term "murder" when talking about abortion. We must get into their heads that when a woman aborts is not for fun, okay? Then, if she took this decision is that somewhere it is also best for the child. Why make the world a being who is not expected and therefore may suffer all his life when he has nothing to do? (And sometimes, the mother also has nothing to do). Abortion to save lives (ironically), this I am sure and it's still a great achievement for the Status of Women.

LOL!

A woman has the right to be beaten by an opponent during a real game, a woman is naked in nature, if she is busty with blue sky, They say she may be well rolled, of course if it travels by car, it is refined (oil, it's ugly), she may have the brain without a belt, it can only be found in adultery, if she is an adult and take well air, it can be switched without light, but with a match, it is severe, it has the power to be maintained, but she is often insatiable All means are good to hold, even to the foot under the table, but it is often maquilleet epilating, To have a more slender body, if it is released, she sees the flip side, With the great risk of being chased, being of the people or of high society, it remains the only companion of man She can only really good nurse, it is very essential in all!

Ben made it worse too good chocolate cake too!

It is true that a woman that aligns the men in her bed, it is called a slut, while the contrary they are Don Juan. (I do not share this view. The most liberated women I find it very bad and everyone does what he wants without being judged by others trapped shit!)

Because there is so much demand that unfortunately there are 11 months of waiting …

because the family planning and abortion clinics are overwhelmed, lack of resources, gynécos, budgeting, credit … and that it will not go by arranging …

I would suspect insidiously to have other targets obscure (well not that much) … One way as another to be against abortion … it's outrageous …

This is clearly a sneaky way to limit the right to abortion.

This question is for all those who misuse religion, pro-Islamic Sharia, pro-burka, all-halal, but also to other believers as extremists cathos anti-abortion and anti-gay or I do not know what to another. We are in a secular country, is being faithful to your honor, I myself believe, but to some, stop imposing your ideas and ways of life to others.

But the ones you describe are perfectly understood that France is secular, and that is what they can not stand and fight with all their forces.Je am very proud that advance social and political my country, even if nothing is ever perfect, a country that keeps centuries ahead of others, though not behind other plans

Oh some in France want to impose the religion of "do what you want" sex .. drugs … alcohol and acceptance of homosexuality I said no!

I totally agree with is that you say, all the extremists of all outside edge is about having the butter and butter money. they are not open to others what is normally the basis of religion, they are racist, not tolerate, that are judging others, look in the attitude of the other etc. ..

I do not see the link between abortion and secularism

I personally am not against abortion but it is a bit trivialized and show the truth to the students is a step towards allowing a lucid awareness and knowledge about the thing. Abortion is killing a living being, do not take it lightly!

Because he did not want to indoctrinate students with his own ideas.

videos shown to students must be shocking! and hurt the sensibilities of some students! despite that these videos will reveal a strict truth he did not intend to disclose it without authorization from his superiors! hello everyone!