How to understand Exodus 21:22,23: "If men fight, they actually encounter a pregnant woman and her children out, but without a fatal accident, it is imperative to impose a compensation according to the owner of the woman will require it, and he will give it through the judges. But if a fatal accident, then you must give soul for soul,

I'm sure God approves of abortion of the child of the devil.

Abortion is possible before 40 days of life of the fetus. Aude 40 days then the soul is breathed into the fetus and abortion is prohibited.

- Religious wars, in the eyes of God, is it legal or is it murder? – When god God asks Abraham (legend I reassure you) to kill his son, is it legal or is it a murder by proxy in the eyes of the applicant (god)? – When God gives Cain kill Abel, is it legal or is it a murder in the eyes of god?

Hi! If it's an accident, an accident and no one is responsible for an accident. But abortion is never an accident, it is a voluntary act (abortion: Abortion). And if it is voluntary, it is murder … – "There will be in your country or one miscarrying or barren. I will fulfill the number of thy days. "(Exodus 23:26). … Because God has commanded! Amen.

Bonsoir Fatal accident is said twice in these two verses. abortion, crime Oh how consent can not be an accident, a crime of murder clearly intended and desired, the mother wanted for X reason (sometimes called by the parent) do not bother to give life without giving up sex. sexual intercourse was made and intended by the Lord God between a man and a woman consecrated by God (who is the inventor of marriage, Genesis 2:24 Ephesians 5:31) 8:13 p.m. Do not murder. is a commandment of God's law Jacques 2 2:10 For whoever keeps the whole law and yet stumbles against one, he is guilty of all. 2:11 For he who said, Thou shalt not commit adultery, said also, Thou shalt not kill. But if you do not commit adultery but do commit murder, you have become a transgressor of the law. crime is to kill a living being with the desire to intentionally kill him. even babies are considered viable because it would have no abortion. babies are considered viable as well, for without abortion auraientnormalement he lived. This takes us back a little massacre of the innocents Herod decreed that the demon to kill the newborn Christ, fortunately without success. The accident is rather seen in the case of an unwanted abortion by the mother

What is abortion? Abortion is the expulsion of an embryo or a fetus, under normal conditions, is not viable outside the womb Jehovah He sees an embryo as a human being? "For you knit me (…) you in the womb .(…) Your eyes saw my embryo, and were written in your book all its parts, in terms of days when they were trained and where there was not one of them. " (Psaumes139 :13-16) He who Jehovah is the origin of life (Acts 17:28), the life of a child in the early stages of its development, just after the design has a very large value, so a pregnant woman who was knocked should be compensated and if there was death of the fetus so it was the Mosaic law which came into effect "soul to soul" (Deuteronomy 19:21), a life been removed, another life had to compensate the loss put an end voluntarily (no miscarriage or accident) in the life of a fetus. '(Psaumes139 :13-16) He who Jehovah is the source of human life (Acts 17:28), the life of a child in the early stages of its development, just after the design has a great value, so a pregnant woman who was knocked should be compensated and if there were fetal death so it was the Mosaic law which came into effect "soul to soul" (Deuteronomy 19:21), a life was taken away, another life had to compensate the loss Ending voluntarily (no miscarriage or accident) to the life of a fœtusest considered by the God of the Bible as a murder ..

Tradition holds us when you are!

Strange … because very contradictory, but indeed I think it is well established traditions in the brains of very exclusive …

Because these people have no sense. Dictate what the idiots want, they want

But is it not equally contradictory to be for abortion and against the death penalty? That is to say, taking the life of an innocent and let it saves a rot. They therefore have no logic, it is the diktat of morons and very closed from what I read above.

Me, no. I am against abortion, and especially against the death penalty.

The reverse is equally troubling and the much more common, most who are against the death penalty for abortion is not a paradox we kill those who are weak, words, fetuses, etc., a human power

You seem to do a lot of fillings in your questions. Other form of prejudice? But a different style Islamists.

not at all certain I am for the death penalty and abortion and am not the only

"Cons" "to" to do a case by case

Is not women decide? or rather, each woman? By what right a man can decide his ban? as rightists in the 70s? Is not that disgusting?

Whatever the opinions of others.

You still have to explain to young women that abortion is NOT a contraceptive. Abortion is a traumatic operation and should be practiced only as a last resort and especially without delay.

This is obviously not up to him. But see the case he dreams of being a father … but yes it does exist, it will try to persuade his girlfriend, we understand that. Once I do an abortion or abortion was a crime we were talking about abortionist … this time not so long ago and people still consider it a crime and would like to impose their beliefs on others .. Besides few services do hospitals and many are going abroad.

Precisely because they are men ………. And machismo still reigns almost by atavism! So it is for or against the woman who is master of his stomach and should remain in any case a man must decide for us! and those who are backward and cons are suffering from acute obscurantism! PS not that right-wingers of the 70s sorry! The MLF had its militant leftists v bcp as we say today "! PS2 and I'll remember it the right to vote that made the abortion law to free Ms. Veil and Giscard who tremendously supported! "I like that does not distort the facts or history

I think that man should not impose its decision. But the woman either. If the "father" wants to keep the child, is his right, and I find it disgusting on the part of the girl have an abortion anyway. Conversely, if the "mother" wants to keep her unborn child is just as disgusting on the part of man to force her to abort. It must be a mutual decision. Aty, be less aggressive, you might think you want to exclude men of any decision "because they are just men." Is ambiguous, be careful. Moreover, whether or not your point of view, we must consult the man and woman in this kind of decision. Now, ethically speaking, it is also a right. A man would not have the right to condemn this practice, but if a woman? If this man is disgusted by abortion, it is his opinion, point bar. Same thing for a woman. As is their right to believe in God or not. After, we must know the difference between defending his point of view, and impose his point of view …

really?? they do have the right to have an opinion on the pretext that they are men?? and can be put aside a certain Mary there is a little more than 2010 years to a woman is pregnant must be a man.

it is for the woman should return the decision to abort or not, anyway, the desire for children that are living in two. but ultimately that is the body of the woman and her child that it 's act. that is difficult enough in this question if we add more moral judgments that is hell.

They do not baptize their children almost bastards! They are for abortion shameful thing !!!…. Here are two example .. what do you think? Chtonk I'm perfect! I have no default so if I'm finished you're a piss me.rde! Caraille it means nothing is caralho you make it a good Palhaço you clown!

Yes we are entered in the XXI century, it will do …

and volunteer, you've been over to piss you .. the term "free choice", it speaks to you or that you totally beyond? @ Dding: lol … have expired cottage cheese instead of the brain and adversely affect your level of perfection … but you're sure to be a beast, as it is with this that you judge …

He remains happily issues on which France is ahead of others. The fact that a woman can have her body as she hears it and does not impose a religion on a newborn are part of this progress must be defended at all costs.

And yes the French have had the misfortune to use their brains and discovered that religions are nonsense fabrics ….

The leaders of the revolution of 68 told them that to be happy he had forgotten God and to enjoy. To enjoy, it should consume. The French have abandoned the churches to fill the supermarkets. So, happy?

And why do you insult you bastards of their children. Chtonk is absolutely right, you were finished with the piss and then you got rolled in the merd.e, you can feel it from here!

You're retarded and that what you say that binds you. Fortunately we have the right to disagree with you. You know why we are atheists? You figure that they liked moderately religious people do not care that their pockets in connivance with the Kings. It has a long history of cutting head at this level.

Well if t''es perfect stay in your wonderful country and fools us peace! It was the Revolution in 1789 and 1968 for the rights and freedoms and we are happy: we have the right to believe in a God or not, goat, cabbage stuffed one has the right to make kids not to do, and it is free of our bodies we passed the stage of "sub-sea …" slaves of men in short one IS HAPPY IN FRANCE! in fact perfect or not?

Because we can not stand to be manipulated, used and abused as you are!

But what I get involved abroad!

Who is this microcephalic gives us lessons … Go back to your cave, Cro Magnon (oh no shit I just insult Cro Magnon in comparison with you)

So caraille is not you who boasted of sleeping with older women? Ho clowns portugal, it's like their laundresses, when they do fart bubbles.

Yes, the French deny virtually all their values and one of the prime ideals of the republic, has always been to destroy the Catholic religion. They have more self esteem and even let rule by foreigners. This is only a small people.

Simply by what he is disillusioned by their history, clergy abuse, the abolition of privileges of the church, French Revolution, education, scientific and logical reasoning, but may also be because there are still such provocation which is useless! If it is to inflame hatred that serves no purpose either!

The world is changing but if you have money it's fine if you do not it ….

One of the unfortunate consequences of secularism direct …

Sheikh Al-Hasan Basri [(641-642 - 728-729) AH, 21-110] Nicknamed Abu el-Hassan Seid bin Abil-Hassan Yecar, born in Medina, he was raised in the house of the Messenger ( saws) and sat among the companions, his first name "Hasan" he was also given by Umar (may Allah be pleased), who invoked God's blessings upon him. His father was a freed slave Zayd Ibn Thabit, and his mother a slave freed from the Mother of the Believers, Umm Selama, which takes care of him like his own son, suckling her milk blessed and said: "My God, provides your child with this and do that becomes the model of the Family "Al Ghazzali said of him:" He is the one whose words were closer to those of the Prophets, and one whose example the closest of Companions of the Prophet – peace and blessings be upon him. "Confirming the words of Imam An-Nawawi about him:" He is a leader, a scholar refined, a lawyer, a trusted man, a devotee, an ascetic knowledge. Once freed, the slaves from Hasan Basri seréunirent and spoke to him in his words: "O pious religion, we have to reproach you." "About what?" He replied. They said: "Why have you waited all these weeks to talk about our postage when you knew how much we needed it?" He replied as follows: "What delayed me is that I had no slaves or what to buy. When Allah gave me some money [by working for it], I bought a slave and then I have freed. So when I called the people to emancipate their slaves in my sermon, their hearts were open to my word, because I had first applied what I asked others. "Memorial of the Saints (Attar)

I think it is better to quote the Prophet's sira rather than other people at risk of them hoisted pae low times to a degree of sacredness, for Hasan al Basri you know that others have used his thoughts to create too u know Mâtazilites Cotesti,

The prophet that the salvation of God be upon him said: "I left you two things if you follow these you will never go astray is the Koran and the Sunna …"

I defy you asshole Wherever you want wherever you are!! allleez chick just for that ISLAM ??????????????

According to Aisha, may God be pleased with him, the holy Prophet, peace be upon him and hello, reported that God said: "Whoever offends one of my beloved (Waly Awliya plural) I declare war. My servant can get closer to me than through what I've ordered. By his acts of supererogation, it is closer to what I love. And if I like it, I get the eye with which he sees, the ear with which he hears, the hand with which he grasps things.

thank you for the reminder of this eminent scholar whose piety rahimahu allah remember Sheikh Cha'rawi rahimahu allah, I invite the opportunity to see mm exegesis of the Quran that man I admire as well.

Has links with Bin Laden?

Hello everyone, my friend has a big problem, she made out with a man soon makes AC 5years and still no marriage alone projects .. voila she comes out she is pregnant by her boyfriend 3 weeks who is afraid of his own parents put pressure him to go get an abortion when she has already had an abortion it just 2 months YS .. she loves this baby and wants to keep it because already in his thirties opportunities make a baby begins to decrease if it is his only chance to get?? also her boyfriend threatened to leave if she keeps the child … in your opinion what should it do?? helping the

At 31, I imagine that your friend has a stable job situation and is able to be independent so I do not see why his parents have the right and ability to put pressure on him. She is an adult and responsible for his actions. If she had an abortion two months ago … this new pregnancy, she has sought or when she and her boyfriend totally irresponsible! : S Anyway, above all, it must ask themselves whether it is willing and able (morally and financially) to take a child alone. Then there is the choice between this child and her boyfriend …

Hello everyone, my friend has a big problem, she made out with a man soon makes AC 5years and still no marriage alone projects .. voila she comes out she is pregnant by her boyfriend 3 weeks who is afraid of his own parents put pressure him to go get an abortion when she has already had an abortion two months ago .. she just loves this baby and wants to keep it because already in his thirties opportunities make a baby begins to decrease if it is his only chance to get?? also her boyfriend threatened to leave if she keeps the child … in your opinion what should it do?? helping the

"Helping the '? She is 31 years old! We do not know! Looks like a string for superstitious: if we do not move the story ridiculous, it's bad luck?

To her alone and make that decision, it is his body. Guys who threaten to leave if she miscarried is not a guy who is not worth the trouble. If she is able to raise her baby if she wants to keep her guard if she prefers abortion she aborts. Good luck with this difficult choice.

1 – In the anus, numerous live microorganisms that exist in that place and that their role is to contribute to the "decomposition" (I do not know if this is the appropriate term) of faeces (faeces = shit-sorry for this explanation, because I do not banish this term exists in the dictionary!) These microorganisms are found ONLY in the anus, this implies how much their presence in another place can be dangerous. So when a man enters his wife through the anus: a-these organisms can penetrate through the small hole (where he pees) and may cause him serious illness including impotence and the fact of not being fertile (this means that male fertility ans spermatozoon become unfit for the fertilization of the ovum of the woman). It becomes stréril! And that's not counting local infections and the poor wretch can not make love to his beloved because he bobo! b-after penetration into the anus, the man will surely make a small tour vagina, and that there can be dramatic. 2 – Around the anus is a sphincter muscle that works a bit automatically, by contraction-expansion, ie when you want to f ***, and we're sitting on the toilet it opens (it's psychological) but not when sitting still, it remains closed! Fortunately, because otherwise, imagine the damage! This is not a voluntary act I think it's a reflex action * (or it looks like him) is not made to receive something, iln'est not designed for anything! So when the man entered through that door! it extended to every muscle as it expands! And strength, the loss of muscle strength! As a result it fails to close completely over! Well imagine you there are people whose anal sphincter muscle does not contract any further! They are obliged to put diapers! This is not funny and plus it stink! Sources: My uncle, a professor of surgery, general medicine and infectious diseases

@ Manel Christiano, you doing what else in life besides thinking about ass?

Thank you for the info

That's why it should not go against nature

Fortunately I have never practiced it. It disgusts me already … There, you put the package!

Are you Doctor? .. I do not believe everything you just tell. waste "poop" are already prepared and stored in the small intestine. these wastes can not leave because the anus is sealed. an anus is closed premeditated by man, because being away from home, the man manages to keep up the house .. into the toilet. So the man contracts and relaxes the muscle volontairement.c is only the digestive juice and digestion which convert food waste. no anus. also gives your stem .. thank you!

Outside the very last point on which you approach that I have some doubts to have known cases that match what you describe, I would tend to refute your argument (not necessarily what you assert, but the consequences or deductions that you draw). 1) Some micro-organisms that exist there. Yes, unreservedly. 2) They may also become pathogenic. Yes. However, some environments are especially equipped for defense. 3) After [...] surely do a small tour vagina. It can. Or not. Personally, whenever I happened to go from back to front, I always made a detour to the bathroom before. No question, in fact, mixing the two. I even tried (with some success) to educate those of my friends that I knew "practitioners." Yeah, it cuts a little note, but when it's clear to both, it poses no real problem. 4) micro-organisms can enter through the meatus should be noted that one can wear a condom. 4) micro-organisms can enter through the meatus should be noted that one can wear a condom (in many cases it is strongly recommended). Apart from this solution, nature is still rather well done. Have you noticed how often, after an orgasm, want to have to go pee? This reaction is not psychological (as opposed to what one of my friends has long believed), nor the only result that prostate snaps into position "standard". It is an internal cleaning mechanism, which aims to remove the seeds eventually introduced into the urethra. This is useful for everyone since it can also nab the nasty microbes in the vagina. On the question of the anal sphincters is like all practices: enough is enough. A little exercise is good for health. Many sports that require attention. Too little sports seriously damaging and even killing. Same thing here. Any damage that you describe do exist, but they correspond to extreme practices and remain very marginal in relation to the total number of sodomites. Those who have. Desproblèmes those who are most often people who do not take basic precautions, or who have not been sufficiently attentive to their bodies. In summary, your post is unnecessarily alarmist and, in this form, untrue. Basically, as it is written, it looks like "smoking kills" on cigarette packages: "sodomy will make you sterile and incontinent" (you forgot "and send you straight to hell"). NO. The reality, as often is much more nuanced. Sodomy is a practice that requires care and vigilance. And which, I grant you, those who do not want should not be forced. As in all areas of love. No? ================================ @ Anna: Why? Did you find anything in the "life", more important or more interesting than the ass? ================================ @ Christiano: the reference to your source confirms what I thought. Your uncle, by the nature of its activity, is typically in the syndrome of "the tree that hides the. Your uncle, by the nature of its activity, is typically in the syndrome of "the tree that hides laforêt" sodomites the few who have problems come to see the multitude that goes do not contact, outcome, he sees only the minority. QED.

A link, a book title, anything, but a source please! I remain skeptical!

1 – In the anus, numerous live microorganisms that exist in that place and that their role is to contribute to the "decomposition" (I do not know if this is the appropriate term) of faeces (faeces = shit-sorry for this explanation, because I do not banish this term exists in the dictionary!) These microorganisms are found ONLY in the anus, this implies how much their presence in another place can be dangerous. So when a man enters his wife through the anus: a-these organisms can penetrate through the small hole (where he pees) and may cause him serious illness including impotence and the fact of not being fertile (this means that male fertility ans spermatozoon become unfit for the fertilization of the ovum of the woman). It becomes stréril! And that's not counting local infections and the poor wretch can not make love to his beloved because he bobo! b-after penetration into the anus, the man will surely make a small tour vagina, and that there can be dramatic. 2 – Around the anus is a sphincter muscle that works a bit automatically, by contraction-expansion, ie when you want to f ***, and we're sitting on the toilet it opens (it's psychological) but not when sitting still, it remains closed! Fortunately, because otherwise, imagine the damage! This is not a voluntary act I think it's a reflex action * (or it looks like him) is not made to receive something, iln'est not designed for anything! So when the man entered through that door! it extended to every muscle as it expands! And strength, the loss of muscle strength! As a result it fails to close completely over! Well imagine you there are people whose anal sphincter muscle does not contract any further! They are obliged to put diapers! This is not funny and plus it stink!

Super!

ahem! ok, I'll think banning sodomy in my life then! horrib is' what you say!

Yes, but it's so good …

should not be clairvoyant to think about what will happen in the spincter destroying them but you have to be perverse to practice sodomy with a woman (I do not speak of homosexuals is their problem

yes, it's a biology course with highly structured examples thank you

Finally, something sensible and intelligent to say in this topic. It is always wise to give such information to a lot of people who know nothing about this practice and fellatio and cunnilingus.

My dear, it is also practiced between two men … Anyway, thank you for the comment very unsavory, I would not die silly.

After these explanations will reflect the followers of this practice, I have to tell you, "VIVE LA Jobs."

FN you vote?

finally someone who does not trivialize sodomy as too many have tended to do today and thank you for detailed explanations as well mealtime it is not the most appetizing …

I wonder if with age, a virgin, ends up losing its physical assets. basically, if neither husband nor breastfeeding babies, is ensured to have nice tits for eternity?

Not always, up to 95 years only.

Never in my life …. not even 95 years ago at age 55 she began the wound

No no no .. Too bad for you;)

You're very funny! Virgin or not, the body of a woman ages, her body, her breasts will be firmer, but softened, the law of nature.