You're more Islamophobic, Zionist and then a police state or rather Islamophobic, anti-Semitic, xenophobic, revisionist, for the death penalty and against abortion??

You may request them to be much on this one, -)

Hello girls! I finally came to lull baby and leave it in his basket! Zoom, I just see you! Well, my daughter is 1 month now and I'm stiff mad crazy about her. I'm breastfeeding, so she is always glued to me (or my within lol). Yesterday, my youngest step-son (13 years) wanted to take her in his arms while I was preparing dinner. On the insistence of the dad, I said yes, aware of the importance they create ties of brother / sister. But then there disaster: I realized I could not stand it either his arms. Without realizing it, he walked with her in his arms, and the baby's head came close many times over the walls … I told him to be careful of my voice the more sedate, but in reality I've realized that I hated it to be with him. For now, she is either with me or with his dad. I find it so fragile … You think I am extreme? @ Pirate: Ouch ouch @ Emma: This is my step-son. It is. It estgentil, but head into the air. He was walking with my daughter in her arms without paying attention, it showed. He even dropped a hand for a drink, walking! I will never forgive him if he came QQE thing to my daughter. You're right, I'll ask him to sit. Two weeks ago (she was 15 days), his father was cleared to climb the stairs with her sister in her arms. I was sick! @ Bell: You're mom? I said the same thing as you when I really was not ana … @ Conda: It's a way to talk, lend, eh! I am also happy that he is interested in her sister (the two largest not have anything to do), but I find it too awkward. He keeps breaking objects already he is not careful. Cecile @: Thank you! I realize that I mix very different feelings. And I gotta work. Despite all my efforts for 5 years, I can not imagine to be a family in the truest sense of the word with my wife's son. Because even though we share many things together, I. Because even though we share many things together, I "suffered" when even their presence. I did not choose! Especially in this time, they do nothing at home to help me, as if they were at the hotel. So, I live among them as evil, I know .., @ Cecilia: It is extremely inconsistent this step-son: he has a habit of making beautiful mistakes, and apologize later … Except that when one hits a skull of one month old baby against a wall, the excuses do not matter …

Far too possessive, yes.

No I understand you! I'm like this is, if you do not want to create tension in the family, allows his half-brother to take but only when it is placed quietly on the sofa for instance, with you or his father's side. So you do shalt not stress every time his head grazes a cabinet! With my son I was like you to start as soon as someone took it I stopped breathing while trying to keep a normal head!

This is normal, it did a month and it is fragile. You should allow this young man to take, but only on a bed or sitting.

no doubt. you remember a friend who always speaks of his daughter, who always psychotic for his daughter, who does everything a mountain of nothing when it comes to SA girl ….. there is nothing more than a mother in the world Enervent excessive ha if perhaps these children when they grow up …

hello, yes too possessive! Already the word "OPEN"! This is not an object (sorry but that word offends me). Entrusting would be more appropriate. It is normal to have peur.Mon 4th child at 25 days and when his brother took him 12 years, I'm scared too, I'm glad pareil.Mais he wants to take it, rather than mock them. To be afraid is to normal.Delà prevent any manifestation of tenderness, this would be a shame.

my kid 3 years old the other day wanted to take my boy ben necessarily after I said no, you can offer him to sit on the sofa with her, right? he is sitting comfortably possessiveness "is a phase normal, but it must still be careful not to shut himself in a bit … let your daughter but when he sat dasn a chair or sofa for instance, at least it's reassuring to see you take good care her safe and after you leave more easily

Your daughter is not glass. We must accustom with the people around you so that it is not wild.

There are two distinct feelings in what you're telling us there … First, the "fear" (very legitimate) because a teen is a little awkward in her arms, your little princess! Reminds me a bit …. me, when my youngest was born! My daughter was 16 years and took care of like a second mommy, but my son was just 13 years too! But he wanted to take her little sister in his arms (while having a little afraid …), then confided to him when he was sitting comfortably on the sofa … he did not acrobatics, do not walk with her in his arms, etc … cons but he loved to give him the bottle (with me to oversee operations, hey ho, anyway, hahaha …). The second feeling I find in your story, and then there …. it angers me I do not hide it, it's jealousy against the brother and the sense of "ownership" to this little girl … I know that this is not your own children (I have followed. I know that this is not your own children (I have followed your story Deloin with these kids and their dad …) but for them it is still their little sister, especially since you live in the same roof, so they are required to forge close ties. "I realized I hated it to be with him," "I could not stand it either in his arms "….. AC is still going much further than the fear of seeing him hurt unintentionally, because of his negligence or his young age, right??! It's hard what you say … So, to answer the final question, YES, I think you are too! Be happy that this young boy is interested in your little girl with her, you can become a "real" family is the bond between father, the boys and the "new" mom. I wish you all a happy life, take time to make your mark and enjoy these magical moments with your daughter, time passes so quickly! @ Dding … yes, yes, I understand the problem of '. yes, yes, I understand the problem of 'inconsistency' of the young and I agree with your concern as I told you! On this side there you can (and should!) Imposing your limits and your act (that is still your girl). Namely, it is a tiny baby, it takes until it is seated, and not because he is "only" his half-brother, but because it is too young and head in the air (explain!). … For the rest I do not judge you, your situation is difficult and I've never experienced anything like it … I've just expressed my feelings.

I understand you without having lived the exact same thing. At the birth of my daughter, I could not stand my in-laws take it or keep it. Not for safety reasons, but I do not feel any family relationship with them, then give them my flesh, before being awaited, it was almost unbearable. But I took it upon myself and over time (2 years) I feel better, but it will never be with my family . For your step-son, there is a safety issue as well, just explain that it is not a toy and yet it is better to do than take when he sits. Says also to your spouse and I'm sure everything will be fine.

Yes it is good …. your daughter, but also the beloved sister and thus the SES children who have the same blood (or almost) that you entered your daughter …. For ?…… now your feeling of wanting to protect it's normal it is still quite small, but later when she grows up to 3 years old, she hugged him and he spent hours playing with it for that thou shalt take a bath there you will be glad and yet it still your girl …. At this moment you think back to those times when you were afraid that the case and you say that you do well to let s tame early! Another thing you darling request your permission to take it early or I misunderstood? Because I think it's limited anyway, it's his son who asks to wear his sister, there is no authorization to ask for this so that, for dear eh! So you take on is early as the links are created, so lets do …. on the couch for now I agree. You can also do participate in bath time, it would take to. You can also do participate in bath time, it would take for desphotos him PYJ choose, or you just bring the show to the bathroom. Do not show him that you do not want too it was key that could hurt him and suddenly change their behavior rather sympathetic with his sister. Especially because I think the behavior of the three together you ascend to the head and then I think that if their father does not hit his fist on the table is for you to do that to quarrel with them, must not abuse t 're not their stooge! Well I had a quarter of an hour to hang out here it is with joy that I will have spent;)) Kisses to you and your princess!

ahem ahem … I'll tell you stuff, but not you bite me eh! .. ^ ^ It's your daughter is "only" your step-son, and subconsciously (but actually not that much, because it shows a little), you gonna make a difference … to counter the psychological aftermath of a Beaujolais Nouveau: they already have your baby, and they take your daughter … you feel deprived of the only "thing" that is you (you) in this house, and it is this ownership that you can not stand … I think relativized, you also hold it in one arm while you doing anything on the other hand … you were a beginner, and awkward, it also will … you would have taken it badly yell because you held not "properly", do you think it will be constructive to bawl your step-son because oops, it slipped a little one? in one of your additions, you say you do not have chosen. Well, if, nevertheless, by choosing your beloved, thou hast chosen, too … (I know eh, there's a lot of work …) My second son is a big nag,.) My second son is a big nag, but then ze big big nag (with honey, it's called richard stone, to give you an idea), it was almost 9 years to the birth of his half-sister, and despite its liabilities nag, I have not hesitated to let him drive his sis (bottle, bath) under surveillance. the advantage that my stone was Richard, was that he was also my son .. They were "tied" vis-à-vis me, if I may say … Come on, hurry up girl … we relax, we take a pti Oinj … ^ ^ (About the response of a bell, there's perhaps not as wrong either … I will admit that a baby is fragile, but it's not, I think, in terms of fragility that make you cringe …)

My treasure to me in 9 months. Monday I was in the Swedish store with him and his godmother, I carried my bag on the shoulder and giving it back the nipple him my bag fell on his head, one can justifiably Chouin but I was collapsed in front of his forehead red. What I mean is that we want to protect it nice we may also do them harm unintentionally. We can not protect them all I think you should explain to your son in law for their own safety that he knows and respects them (take it from underneath the head and buttocks, etc.), but let it take care his little sister can get closer to him and you and allow you to both of you to create a deeper bond. I regret that you speak of these children suffer, trying to create harmony in your family enjoying this little girl you binding. I wish you much happiness and cloudless blue without, or not too …!

I think your feeling is normal, at first I did not like my daughter to be in other arms than mine (breast too)! I think it's a bit of instinct, our baby is so vulnerable! Nevertheless, I hope to reassure you!? Gradually you learn, you learn both to separate you and you do not realize it thee! Also, as a teenager (and still now), I was really left: I bumped into anything and everything , I broke moult thing, finally escaped bcp other cata walking …. yet I've never inadvertently knocked my little brother who is 10 years younger and much less my baby … I did never dropped either … I think in time these shots here we are more alert and much more clever! My advice … do leave at your own pace … if you tracks and stress that's where you run the risk of cata!

baeucoup rop possesions my niece was born in January I had just celebrated my 13 years and yet my sister in law let me wear it when she was one day I could change it! yet his mother something with her daughter as soon as it has has not pooped 12:00 supposing it puts a very frenchies so you can not let you go in that direction! you must speak in a nursery

A future spoiled child who will tell you close your mouth at age 15! Dsl is how it happens! Stay connected to the world especially! otherwise Congratulations!

Good evening, I would say yes you seems a little possessive, but this is quite normal tone has a little bit months. To me it is just pure folly to let a child 13 years ago this walk with a baby in his arms, he can make it fall. I who hate to have my child (not yet started but planned for the next year) I would never let my 9 year niece who'll take this child in his arms before the 3 years of the child. too afraid it falls or other! I'll offer my congratulations for this baby and I am a man XD

As said "Nessy you're the best," we are not parents yet but I work in the middle of childhood and your attitude is more understandable, especially since you know your step-son. There is nothing wrong with being afraid for her child, especially at this age and do not forget that the hormones make you want to protect this little creature that you gave birth. You can talk with the father of your child and tell him about your fears and you agree regarding the baby and her brother sitting on the couch with her sister, yes, but not standing (let alone stairs …). And you're right "when the skull hits a baby one month against a wall, the excuses do not matter …". Caution is the mother of safety ….. Good luck and congratulations for that bit!

I understand you perfectly. He can be very bad to him banging his head against a wall or something else and that he could leave scars which can not realize that after years. A mother should protect her baby, and when he begins to grow, ben! then she leaves him breathe and live his life.

legalized and that future generations will think it is the thought of one person who is at the root of this horror as the Jews think it is Hitler who is at the root of the genocide of their people? Typsee to: Contraception is made for dogs? to kali: ya mistaken identity, I do not see what you're talking about! to Mettallic: I will discuss with you. I answer your question, here's the link: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-202141203496663073 # Who is the being you see? An alien or a human? Disintegrating: "Your birth deserves the Nobel Bullshit." I wish you the same price but posthumously! To Aitma: in cases of rape, serious accident, malformation, congenital disease only, I conceive it to be authorized. I exclude all other grounds. When a woman / man does not have kids we point guard bar. Not expected to be one develops in the womb of the mother. Nina, I'm all for nothing if your people have suffered genocide, lol! Calm your nerves. Nina, I'm all for nothing if your people have suffered genocide, lol! Calm your nerfspov'fille! Emile P. : I am not free humanity. At the bottom of my question, I added a stakeholder information on abortion permitted only "in cases of rape, serious accident, malformation disease". You will agree that today abortion is also no reason and has become as commonplace as going to the hairdresser and sometimes even used as a means of contraception wild, this type of abuse that I designate. Emile P. : I wish that abortion should be regulated and restricted only to cases that I quoted + high. The monkeys in China: It's just what you would want dis.Personne ended in hospital waste among clips soiled utensils and other germs and bacteria. All the assholes who are for abortion have to end their lives if they are against life. S. Veil is Jewish and wants to subject the French people the same as his people suffered only by desire for revenge because she does not like France. It is cruel not only to see the look. It is cruel not to see a. .. regardqu'elle supposedly for the good of French! The.Rese laughter: "As for your comparison with the genocide, it is clear that you know nothing about history either …" I do not want to know your fuckin history! The result is the same in 2 cases asshole! It is death which is the final destination. Genocide comes from the Latin term caedere, "kill", "massacre". So the story you're the asshole is very deep! To Yaa: Thank you for your frankness. "I do not see a kid who has made a mistake, having to take a birth that exceed the". I will not make the language of wood, so listen: It is in France, the hood does exist, it is the pills, IUDs and also when not using them the morning after pill is there to make up the deficiency (within 3 days of the report). So the girl who kisses can also make the effort to use them, right? Now I have a question for you: You have liked your mother an abortion and end up rotting in a garbage among the waste. So the girl who kisses can also make the effort to use them, right? Now I have a question for you: You have liked your mother an abortion and end up rotting in a garbage dechetssouillés among the hospital? Please answer to Warai I mean you do not answer Warai?? Warai you have not answered my question! Lol You have turned my question by drowning the fish and me asking another question because of cowardice you dare tell me "NO I would not like my mother abort me." I will answer you when you have answered mine then. Also, you say a girl has sexual feelings for 18 years and you think it is a strong argument that it does not believe in using a contraceptive and somehow you are the excuses, give him a reason immoral and an issue where she is undergoing psychological trauma … You have to be those that encourage the sexual urges of pedophiles who are pregnant these little girls and I j call it statutory rape too!! A girl who does not respect his ass to everyone unlike you bitch! France became a country where immoral acts are done every day under the guise of an evil act. Poor France! Without faith nor law, nor moral. Bands. Demoutons bands! Ariane, you will have an abortion! At Madam: occupies your own business! I do not see what lady you speak, is mistaken identity. So let me ask the questions I want to … Madam: "Save your own life before you take care of the other ."…." Today, we kill millions of unborn children, and we say nothing. Let us all pray for the courage to defend the unborn child and give the child the opportunity to love and be loved. " Mother Theresa. Nobel Peace Prize in 1979. I think I have nothing to add …

Shut the bitch, you ask yourself too many questions …

You should go to bed, right?

it depends on why abortion

The real crime is to have children who are unable to attend and make them unhappy. Abortion is not a crime and thou hast a chickpea in the head to compare abortion to genocide. Sorry but you're crazy.

"Mr. Chairman, Ladies and Gentlemen, if I rise today in this forum, Minister of health, women and non-parliamentary elected to offer the nation a profound change in the law on abortion, believe me that is with a deep sense of humility before the difficulty of the problem, as at the magnitude of the resonances it stirs up in the most intimate of each of French men and women, and in full awareness of the seriousness of the responsibilities we will bear all … But it is also with great conviction that I will defend a project much thought and deliberation by the entire Government, a project which, in the words of the President of the Republic, is to "ending a situation of disorder and injustice and make a measured and humane solution to one of the most difficult problems of our time." If the Government can now present you such a project, thanks to all of you – and. If the Government can now present you such a project, thanks to all of you – etil are many and from all backgrounds – who for several years, have tried to propose new legislation, better adapted to the social consensus and the actual situation facing our country. It is also because the Government of Mr. Messmer had the responsibility to submit an innovative and courageous. Each of us remembers the remarkable and moving presentation that was made by Mr. Jean Taittinger. It finally because, in a special committee chaired by Mr. Berger, there are many members who Naturally, long hours, representatives of all families in mind, as well as key persons competent in the matter. Yet some people still wonder: a new law is really necessary? For some, things are simple: there is a law enforcement there to enforce it. Others wonder why the Parliament should decide these issues now: everyone knows that since. Others wonder why the Parliament should decide these issues now: everyone knows that depuisl'origine, and particularly since the beginning of the century, the law has always been rigorous, but it has been poorly applied. How have things changed so they, which requires intervention? Why not maintain the principle and continue to apply only in exceptional cases? Why devote a dishonest practice and thus encourage risk? Why legislate and thus cover the laxity of our society, fostering individual self-interest instead of reviving an ethic of civic responsibility and discipline? Why risk aggravating a dangerously low birth rate movement began instead to promote a constructive and generous family policy enabling all mothers to give birth and raise the children they were conceived? Because everything we shows that the question does not arise in those terms. Do you think this government, and that which preceded it would have resolved to develop a text and you propose if they thought that another solution was still. Do you think this government, and that which preceded it would have resolved to develop a text and you propose if they thought that another solution was encorepossible? (…)

you think what you want but I do not know if you got already had kids but if I did every time I made love I fuck my poor shot in the head, then your con *** ** You put it very deep

Abortion is a crime that can not qualify so it is horible

what area

Gaves you with your stories of abortions every day. If you're traumatized by the story of this woman and her husband you were talking about in another question, go see a shrink.

I have three young children, and I'm against abortion! I never experienced this horror, that a foreigner you dig through the entrails, the deepest part of your privacy, you remove a little life! What it horrible! And after? The aftermath? At the sight of a mother-in pretty round belly! @ There's the pill, IUD and many other methods to avoid the horror of an abortion!

if I only girls will be in ca pill was 12-13 years but preferably for the boys to the side mdrrr name

I saw a report not long ago he nya, I know more about what channel but in the country, women who gave birth to a daughter s stripped away by throwing the garbage in landfills and public, was the mother who got rid of the baby. While abortion is it a crime against humanity … a woman who aborts, in general, the baby is not over so I have not think about crime can

Your birth deserves the Nobel Bullshit.

Greetings … In a responsible society, abortion should be permitted only for extreme cases: rape, risk of death. But today, the Western citizen is less and less responsible, mature, and babies are being "objetisés" in store when an item does not please us, we change our minds and get a refund … Today people sleep with anyone in any context, but if a child comes to show, what "normal" person may have little conscience and humanity to deny him life? "People who sleep should be fully aware of the possible consequences: it is a new human being who can appear, a soul, a destiny: how, HOW, be non-human as to kill a baby KNOWINGLY, appeared to be irresponsible too? Doing something as serious a weak and helpless, innocent and pure of all this case, then we would have refused for himself (if my parents had, I would

No, abortion is not a crime against humanity. To borrow a buzzword from elsewhere and apparently a lawyer, it repressed the gates at The Hague, the Netherlands city where the International Criminal Court, responsible for these cases. The right of a woman choice in the matter of abortion has nothing to do with the Holocaust. These are practices that, in most countries where human rights are respected, are regulated and legal. The ban is to open the door to illegal abortions done anyhow, abandonment or murder of children, and yes, it is illegal … make laws to prohibit women from abort safely, with dignity, even those who have been raped, that's Nazi and that, it is a crime against humanity.

but absolutely right, will have to wait some time before it is understood … as for everything we do the bullshit, we pick up the pieces behind … bof, jvais not think too much over before you know not to sleep anyway: p

It is totally absurd what you say and even if I am not a woman, I have no doubt that abortion remains an ordeal for them and certainly not a hobby or a pastime as you let hear! Nobody forces you to do, but you do not impose your views on that, it is a right which has been obtained and theres probably not touch it, whatever your moods .. about your comparison with the genocide, it is clear that you know nothing about history either … Pff fanatics should be grouped ds a particular country and between them is pathetic ..

Yaa, sorry in advance for my frankness, but are you talking about almost anything. Your Hitler analogy is particularly inappropriate and irrelevant! Your speech is a state of fanaticism. I do not know what is your level of tolerance and openness, but you do not really dig the subject. You're still very presumptuous to condemn without even knowing. Looks like you stay confined to the simplistic "baby = life" and "abortion = baby destruction therefore of life." Abortion is not, of course contraception for sure. This is the last resort to avoid a disaster. Give birth to a life he is able to ensure a decent living, there is no pride in having you have to be responsible and acknowledge having made a mistake it would be wise to do according to his situation. are obviously sometimes overflows (as in all), but then to condemn abortion there is a world. For example: I do not see a kid who has made a mistake,. For example: I do not see a kid who has made a mistake, having to take a birth which exceed, difficult delivery (physiology unterminated not entirely ready-made yet given birth, get a penis has nothing to do with birth of an infant), which is not yet honed to be a mother (immaturity) and that can not afford to host it (with family or not to support it). Over what future will be offered to the infant? Girl, girl, woman everyone has his reasons. Criticize without even knowing my sense is there in the first crime. Ps: By the way, and for your leadership, no method of contraception is 100% reliable. There is always a small% chance of getting pregnant even with maximum safety. Nadialabelle @, then first one is in France but not safe from mistakes (unfortunately), I think the use of the morning after pill should be: First already taken into consciousness just taken a risk. Secondly we must have the appropriate reflexes. What some girls do not have is sad. What some girls do not say it's sad but true. The girl who kisses as you say perhaps did not head on his shoulders (in fact still a child, sexual drive does not begin at 18 …). Now to your question, I feel like to answer with another question. Would you have liked to live in misery, suffering with a mother or a parent who would never have wanted, you would hate for what you represent? Be extra weight in the middle of a crisis? Forever regret your own existence? Would you become someone balanced to you? Would you appreciate life? Be born in the hope of a decent life but yes it Born to be born (because it must be born) is not PS2: If in fact I'm not constantly on Yahoo answers (just to clarify in case of surprise, I do not use messenger as I look back on it from time to time only).

Abortion is a regrettable act. But this is not a crime in a sense of legal philosophy, because abortion does not complain. It crazy because it feels nothing, understands nothing, is not aware of the act, and is not really a human being and conscious functioning. It is not legal because it has no birth certificate or identity card or passport. There is not even for the Catholic religion, as any priest refuses to build his child not yet do is say that has not yet emerged from the womb of his mother and separated from the navel. The question Abortion is a religious and moral, full of sentimentality, which is a societal problem. That society has to decide how to manage this phenomenon. Religion and morality aside, the major problem of abortion is that it eliminates statistically significant humanitarian voluntary opportunities. It is as if each year a company (or God) issue lottery tickets than 1 billion euros to each pregnant mother, and that some of. It is as if each year a company (or God) issue lottery tickets than 1 billion euros to each pregnant mom, and that some of entreelles threw the ticket in the trash. And if the abortion in was number-winner, and it was a question of a billion euros and it was but the little genius who would solve a major problem in the world. Think of all our great men of science. We have a beautiful face if they had been aborted., Not God alone knows how many Pascals, Newton and Einstein, are in the dustbin of abortions since antiquity.

Nadialavilaine .. Ahh! … More poem to the con, this time …. to explain your views to be obviously the best! .. since in your previous question, you have insulted the participants who dared to contradict you … In fact, you do not like Hugo? Say sweetie, you're really a concern, you .. It's not nice to come insult me … .. finally deceive worry, you no discomfort … I like it … With the number of accounts you can have on QR … you do not finish Abuse sweetie … .. continue to call me a slut or conasse! … you took your foot, because at least me … yes my darling … you know what to make of other? .. before you think about abortion … Kiss, it would do you good … If you knew how it's relaxing!

mdrrr thee not done with your bullshit, this woman has not stopped you kept harping that the child cocoon. You are so traumatized that you can not believe it. The means of contraception have ever been 100% reliable proof this woman is. But she filed a complaint and I hope you are going to drool. What you gonna block me too? How has you stuck here? consults, realizes you have a serious problem. Save your own life before you take care of the others. I think it's important for you. And for humanity. I think you become psychologically dangerous both for you than for others. What do you want to let go? that you should send her an ultrasound by a rise as they are in? tared you is

With all the crap that you can say I will not hesitate to argue that if your mother had aborted, it would have been a boon to humanity. As to the question you asked Yaa, I am willing to answer : it would have not done anything that my mother abort me because I do will not realize! You think a pile of cells without conscience is sorry to be killed? Oo

The two questions which seem to exclude any conflict and any emergence of a notice not join your own convictions (they are yours and you have the right to wear them at you), I say clearly and unambiguously: NO ….. of course!

and now you got stuck under the other account! tell thee as another person, you can block everything can be made ahead and re creating make you shut your mouth! but you have my great ridicule and piss off the world and block everyone! you'll eventually find you alone! You want to harass a pregnant woman! t "worried we too will harass you

I breastfeed my baby 2 mois.est I can drink water Contrex

No.

Contrex? If you're sick, you will take a complaint against X

But yes my darling … fuck … stop .. Moms … what you drink does not go directly into your breasts … if you drink orange juice your baby is not likely to have the pulp … SHIT mums .. think ……. what is happening in your breasts if you breastfeed your body is reprocessed! But you really are turkeys?? @ As I just call you a turkey .. I would add that I am a mother of two girls that I have not sterilized bottles and I breastfed … both …. and they are worn as a charm!

@ CHE ptdrrrrr the answer!'re Not a guy ???!!! mdrrr

WHY did you most afraid of the water than another? You think slimming the pub or what?

Breastfeeding or not, you still have the desire to drink the water! Good luck;) (otherwise, why could not you?)

a woman abortionist and adulterer in good conscience. 1942: The law makes abortion a crime against state security, punishable by death. In 1943, Marie-Louise Giraud was guillotined. A woman beheaded for example? Is the story of this woman that this movie tells Claude Chabrol in 1988 realized during the film in the fall, film-Mirama Montparnasse in Paris, the Catholic fundamentalist fanatics threw a tear gas grenade into the room, suffered a heart attack, a spectator died a few hours later. Do not hesitate to see or review this movie.

Yes the Vichy French government finally Nazi collaborator.

It is unclear where the issue is, but you make some useful contributions to knowledge of the Vichy regime. Marshal Petain had married late in life, a divorced woman whom he had apparently known in a brothel. It is among such people that recruits the great defenders of morality … (it is true that the Catholic Church broke the first marriage of Mrs. Petain with Mr. Dehérain, painter. Work, Family Homeland …)

Abortion has always been sentenced under the Old Regime an unmarried woman must declare her pregnancy very soon, there were laws about this, however there was no prosecution if the child was placed in a "tower" usually located in town, there were bearers of children who put them in a basket On the religious prohibition is added after the Great War and because of the massive bloodletting that had occurred, a particularly regressive legislation in this field radicals were the worst enemies of women however Petain to avoid both dramas and marital birth abortions introduced in X, saving the "honor" of the mother and child's life. It is particularly significant that the last woman had been beheaded for this reason

I saw the beautiful movie Chabrol.

Unfortunately the freezer n existed that time ….. I demand the immediate release of veronique Courgeau …. mdr

a woman abortionist and adulterer in good conscience. 1942: The law makes abortion a crime against state security, punishable by death. In 1943, Marie-Louise Giraud was guillotined. A woman beheaded for example? Is the story of this woman that this movie tells Claude Chabrol in 1988 realized during the film in the fall, film-Mirama Montparnasse in Paris, the Catholic fundamentalist fanatics threw a tear gas grenade into the room, suffered a heart attack, a spectator died a few hours later. Do not hesitate to see or review this movie. I admit I saw this movie recently, and this story from a real fact totally shocked me.

Well, it's crazy! I dug up a book on this very subject just yesterday afternoon! Thanks for the info otherwise!

The same people who argue for the "privacy" … are no longer a contradiction.

When you recommend a film, it is also put under … ,-p These d ' "Une affaire de femmes" de Chabrol so.

One of the "past"? It was the only woman to be guillotined for this reason: to have performed 27 abortions illegal. A man, Désiré Pioger, was also beheaded the same year of 1943 for performing illegal abortions 3. I guess the movie "forgets" to mention.

It's very simple, he made them believe that they were not human. Why are Americans they killed Indians without regret or remorse because they were told that they were just wild. Now you understand how one can push a mother killed her baby through the abortion by pretending that it is not yet a human being go www.ivg.net

no idea.

Me I'm in time, abort a girlfriend, I said look it is going to kill the man!

c koi la kestion

You're absolutely right, it is common knowledge that a human being is incapable of killing another if he is not convinced that this is not a human being! Some evidence: – The guy who killed John Lennon was convinced that the former Beatle was actually a carrot. – The guy who killed JFK thought that Bush was the reincarnation of Caligula. – The Khmer Rouge had the intimate conviction that they ran a slaughterhouse for Afghan hounds. By cons, rotten luck, your mother thought he had a human being in the belly. Regards,

Similarly what is happening with the Arabs ……… Packaging and hate propaganda.

Coward us with your propaganda!

Abortion does not work on you unfortunately.

and we also understand why it is so easy for a soldier or an Israeli settler murdered men, women of Palestinian children …

wow! you spend Hitler to abortion through the massacre of American Indians to finally make us your ad on abortion … wow! 're really strong (e)!

Until proven otherwise, Hitler ignored the massacre of Jews.

What you say is an unbelievable stupidity, how can you compare things that have caused millions of death has the freedom of a woman on her body? Earlier generations fought to ensure that women have rights they make you ashamed of your mind with backlog!

Vivelavie Tell me you're asking this "question" in all sections of the site?? Moreover, some do our glorious Q / Ristis enjoy your "question" to make anti-Jewish. Content?

… And we understand why the Zionists massacred Palestinians every day without remorse …

It's very simple, he made them believe that they were not human. Why are Americans they killed Indians without regret or remorse because they were told that they were just wild. Now you understand how one can push a mother killed her baby through the abortion by pretending that it is not yet a human being go www.ivg.net

Milgram experiment regard to abortion: will look elsewhere if I am!

Jewish and you think you got the solution

Propaganda ???????,, It is where the issue.

Abortion is ds some cases inevitable question of life or death. Qd c but not based on medical reasons for life or death c tres grave. C immoral people say that the church should support abortion and c of madness in my opinion.

c for the rest ok and really unhappy but for the Jewish c really not humans, deserve .. after touskil are in Palestine, although I naisssss a new hitler

It's very simple, he made them believe that they were not human. Why are Americans they killed Indians without regret or remorse because they were told that they were just wild. Now you understand how one can push a mother killed her baby through the abortion by pretending that it is not yet a human being go www.ivg.net then let you stop listening to your conscience manipulated

This is different. Abortion is not an extermination. It is a freedom for women.

he convinced his subordinates that the admired and gave orders to a nation of brainwashed soldiers, all very zealous for the Fuhrer. Greek cops now occupy s old in the street, and France soon for us. the abortion is a right and hard won by women. they have the right to choose whether they want a child. how many women have been (raped and impregnated by the master, the farmer, the head etc.) and put in prison for punishment, plus the release of the bastards of priests.

You're one of the 7% cathos fundamentalists abound on this site. Abortion is a right since 1975. We can not compare the Jewish Holocaust with abortion. An embryo of 12 weeks has no conscience.

Hitler térorisé the German people to exterminate the Jews

I do not know if the German people knew about the genocide, but for abortion (6 million / year) and the genocide of Indians outnumber (80 million dead) and the term genocide of Jews without anyone move. If you knew all the contempt I have towards those feminists who advocate abortion with pride … So it is no surprise to see all the countries supporting Israel allow abortion. What horror see European countries declare how all men should act (human rights) 4 years after the Holocaust … PS: look PHILDORA, I am not a Christian but I condemn abortion as murder .. .

And your conscience, it tells you what?? Compare a hard-won rights of women and defended body and soul by Simone Veil (and many other women in the world) to the extermination of American Indians or Holocaust? Women have the right to choose. You'd rather cancel this right and that women return to the "old system" to abort illegally? Or that a rape victim gives birth to a child possibly that it (at best) leave for adoption? Or it may mistreat her whole life? Or kill more or less "accidentally"? Or just a woman who does not want children I believe that your conscience tells you nothing, because I think you have no conscience!

Hitler was a pawn, manipulated by an elite that has made him principal soldier, this does not discount the horrors he committed, but … the truth is that if it had not been expected to support his (propaganda) campaign (and god knows it takes money for) would have voted for him? When the Americans won the war, even those who lived quite ready camps did not know was that plot there, the Germans just wanted out of the crisis after the First World War, the majority never voted for him if they knew, and must stop thinking that the political head is the thought of his people, see in countries like China for example, the Chinese aspire only to live happily away from the oppression committed by their leader … to return to abortion, free for you to give birth to a child conceived in rape, far from love and respect you, being an abandoned child, I would prefer that my mother 's avoids this lack of love. To return to abortion, free for you to give birth to a child conceived in rape, far from love and respect you, being an abandoned child, I would prefer that my mother keeps me this lack of quim love gnaw the end, but still think like that …

Abortion and immigration settlement Their purpose is apolitical. But why not make the connection with the concurrent action taken next year? In 1976, our leaders choose to offset the demographic decline that has accelerated after the Veil law, a settler immigration by allowing family reunification . The same logic of substitution is at work today in countries with a Catholic tradition, where the birth rate collapsed while the number of abortions increased from year to year like other politicians their time, Romano Prodi and Jose Luis Zapatero prefer mass regularization and migration flows they support, rather than listening to the proposals of the defenders of life and family as too reactionary

and you think it's because of who and what, the ladies of Italy and of Spain have chosen to have fewer children? before judging the men of "reactionary" you'd better d ' be somewhat less con

No, but imagine that you're beautiful? Look at your head, except goats, I do not see what you can kiss. @ Mata Hari: no need for a photo, I have my yahoo icon that represents me perfectly.

Your reasoning makes sense but please, do not equate abortion with genocide, just for that, I regret the star that is how we tend to stick to beat! You will never stop giving them grain grinding is physiological or what? You hold the same respect that cathos fundamentalists linked together in front of abortion centers, I had already noticed the ambivalence of your comments. numis69 @: there are beautiful and ugly everywhere lol. Go is farting picture playboy.

You've had really not tired of asking stupid questions ….

Strange how about the fundamentalists of all kinds come together when it comes to women and their freedom to dispose of their bodies as they see fit …..

Since we began to be too many on this planet, it is certain that we had a good solution to curb the birth rate (I am not talking about abortion mas contraception and women's liberation) . Otherwise the kids in Africa starving it does not bother you too much to say shit? Besides if we rely on the young to pay us our pensions, we can perhaps take 50 years, but apparently it doesn ' is not on the agenda … What's wrong …

FTG anything to see?

Oh my opinion Ricard this afternoon was not halal!

're sure your paper does not spain.

Being opposed to abortion is one thing but comparing abortion to genocide – to explain the phenomenon of immigration – is the senior psychiatry – you do there that remark rather clumsy women's freedom and their bodies –

Your question does not concern me because it asks immigrants. But allow me to add my eye to tell you that there is a reality in the depths of your questions, and I think this question courageous. France makes choices that will fit into the primary economic … Putting women behind boxes of super-markets all day for less than the minimum wage, then they give their offspring to keep half their salary! The French company, the mine is in irreversible drifts … Even under the insults of nationalistic pride to two bullets, one has the right to say "Thank you for your response.

What you said makes sense.

We agree.

Smelly!

What is strange is that the birth rate in France is the highest in Europe, and it does not prevent prospective immigrants to rush … Oh my God, I almost said "sweep" … How awful! There's a defect.

Too bad your mother did not know the abortion!

yes and then you're the butcher of women? you would like us to fill your seed and leave us in misery? too bad if the rate of brats like you suffer all their lives? science has given us the abortion so that our stomachs do are the seed of the man that we love. advocates of life? or rather breeding? no soul, no morals, no feelings. what do you mean it 'continue REPRODUCTION satisfies first the financial world and the world of religion or Faignasse can guarantee a good job in the piailliant money to the poor. the abominable man on earth, lazy, soulless, heartless, ruthless.'ll be preaching to animaux.les women are not your slaves. FAIS TOI Castres and the abortion will no longer exist.

If we had given sufficient allocations for the french can make children and raise their kids with dignity, there would be no need today to all allowances for all cockroaches multi anyone "!

Anything! The Veil law has no accelerated decline in population and the number of abortions has been stable for years and no increase at all. The legalization of abortion has not "created" the fact of 'in practice, there were already (illegal and dangerous) and there always will be … like it to reactionary macho or not.