muslims are taking the country. some are stoning adulterous women or men, others are whipping, others do not throw stones nor the whip. in some brothels are legal (Turkey, Tunisia, etc.) in other prostitution is prohibited. some countries muslims tolerate drug production (Afghanistan, Morocco), in others it is forbidden. in some countries justify terrorism by muslims their religion, others do not. Saudi Arabia is forbidden for a woman to drive a car, it exists nowhere else. in some countries (Egypt, Iraq, Palestine) were physically attacked the Christians and killed or put in jail as in Algeria, or they are forbidden to practice their religion altogether (Saudi Arabia) while Islam would advocate tolerance. age of sexual maturity is completely different depending on whether one lives in the Maghreb and Yemen. some countries have even muslims liberalized abortion. the muslims say that the burqa is contrary to Islam, others not. of muslims believe that Islam. of muslims believe that islamn'est not contrary to secularism and democracy, others do not etc. etc. amusing detail in Algeria that illustrates my question and the schizophrenic of this religion: the constitution stipulates that Islam is the religion official and that power belongs only to the people (and not to Allah?) the muslims are saying that there is a Koran, a single text, but there's so many different interpretations as muslims! @ Quetzal: ok but often it's nuances … the Baptist (0.000 .. 1% of Christians) wish that baptism is done in adulthood. good it will not look away! @ Firedamp: Algeria's called "democracy" in its constitution from which this report is established between the government and the people. Democracy is power to men. in a democracy the laws are the laws that men have developed for men, it does not come from the Koran or other antics … @ Adrian: I can give you all my sources of information which are strictly accurate. and if you were not an Arab-Muslim. and if you were not an Arab-musulmanparesseux hidden you could check it yourself on the internet

It is true that the contradictions are legion in the Islamic world but I do not see why you add in relation to Christianity, who also is full of contradictions either in space or in time!

Because everything is consistent in the Bible? Synoptic and apocryphal terms that are perhaps not talking.

There you are, or ignorant or in bad faith. We're talking about 72 or 73 sub-sects or movements of Islam? You know how many branches of Christianity today? Here is a list of key, it is of course not exhaustive, there are more than 3,500 Christian sects identified so far … http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Christian_denominations At least a hundred Pentecostal, Lutheran a hundred, a hundred Baptists, hundreds of Anglican, and these are only the largest among the Protestant only .. . There you delusions ….

islamohpbe vomit … toilet is flushed, it stinks

This is due to a syndrome, a form of superiority complex that makes you feels so "superior" one becomes intellectually lazy … You're right to note the paradox: Islam and democracy are completely incompatible and contradictory because Islam says that man must be subject only to "god" and recognizes no human authority. Except … Except that the authority of god does not come from God but a man, a prophet who claims to be sent from god: he says. What is the evidence? NO! Finally, Mouloud claim that the Quran is the proof. Ouiiii Ah, the Koran, the book says that the earth is flat and the sun revolves around … MDR!

the details of which you allude fun denotes a schizophrenic without limit your person, your normal c igorence guide you say betisses without measurements. the same constitution also states that the people are the source of all power. poor ignorant power in question is one that forms the uniqueness of a people that the same spring that the ruler and the ruled, without it Would there be no life in society. divine power is different, it is proper to God, unbelievers like you were once claimed to hold the desired power, it was only despots who are no longer of this world and who now realize their creator. A word hello

I am not Muslim, but having studied Islam, I believe that most of the information you speak of is false. But hey why try to explain anything when you do not trust that what the media say and you do not do personal research. After it is obvious to one particular thing: Islam, like other religions, unfortunately, the good believers, and others who do not understand properly. This last category denigrate the image of religion. But if you do not make the effort to go a little further, how can you believe just take a speech?

there are many more contradictions in Christianity than in Islam, but what you got is partly true, I'll tell you the cause of all this: it certainly ONE QURAN, no Muslim country but does apply to the letter even Saudi Arabia!

1 – In the anus, numerous live microorganisms that exist in that place and that their role is to contribute to the "decomposition" (I do not know if this is the appropriate term) of faeces (faeces = shit-sorry for this explanation, because I do not banish this term exists in the dictionary!) These microorganisms are found ONLY in the anus, this implies how much their presence in another place can be dangerous. So when a man enters his wife through the anus: a-these organisms can penetrate through the small hole (where he pees) and may cause him serious illness including impotence and the fact of not being fertile (this means that male fertility ans spermatozoon become unfit for the fertilization of the ovum of the woman). It becomes stréril! And that's not counting local infections and the poor wretch can not make love to his beloved because he bobo! b-after penetration into the anus, the man will surely make a small tour vagina, and that there can be dramatic. 2 – Around the anus is a sphincter muscle that works a bit automatically, by contraction-expansion, ie when you want to f ***, and we're sitting on the toilet it opens (it's psychological) but not when sitting still, it remains closed! Fortunately, because otherwise, imagine the damage! This is not a voluntary act I think it's a reflex action * (or it looks like him) is not made to receive something, iln'est not designed for anything! So when the man entered through that door! it extended to every muscle as it expands! And strength, the loss of muscle strength! As a result it fails to close completely over! Well imagine you there are people whose anal sphincter muscle does not contract any further! They are obliged to put diapers! This is not funny and plus it stink! Sources: My uncle, a professor of surgery, general medicine and infectious diseases

@ Manel Christiano, you doing what else in life besides thinking about ass?

Thank you for the info

That's why it should not go against nature

Fortunately I have never practiced it. It disgusts me already … There, you put the package!

Are you Doctor? .. I do not believe everything you just tell. waste "poop" are already prepared and stored in the small intestine. these wastes can not leave because the anus is sealed. an anus is closed premeditated by man, because being away from home, the man manages to keep up the house .. into the toilet. So the man contracts and relaxes the muscle volontairement.c is only the digestive juice and digestion which convert food waste. no anus. also gives your stem .. thank you!

Outside the very last point on which you approach that I have some doubts to have known cases that match what you describe, I would tend to refute your argument (not necessarily what you assert, but the consequences or deductions that you draw). 1) Some micro-organisms that exist there. Yes, unreservedly. 2) They may also become pathogenic. Yes. However, some environments are especially equipped for defense. 3) After [...] surely do a small tour vagina. It can. Or not. Personally, whenever I happened to go from back to front, I always made a detour to the bathroom before. No question, in fact, mixing the two. I even tried (with some success) to educate those of my friends that I knew "practitioners." Yeah, it cuts a little note, but when it's clear to both, it poses no real problem. 4) micro-organisms can enter through the meatus should be noted that one can wear a condom. 4) micro-organisms can enter through the meatus should be noted that one can wear a condom (in many cases it is strongly recommended). Apart from this solution, nature is still rather well done. Have you noticed how often, after an orgasm, want to have to go pee? This reaction is not psychological (as opposed to what one of my friends has long believed), nor the only result that prostate snaps into position "standard". It is an internal cleaning mechanism, which aims to remove the seeds eventually introduced into the urethra. This is useful for everyone since it can also nab the nasty microbes in the vagina. On the question of the anal sphincters is like all practices: enough is enough. A little exercise is good for health. Many sports that require attention. Too little sports seriously damaging and even killing. Same thing here. Any damage that you describe do exist, but they correspond to extreme practices and remain very marginal in relation to the total number of sodomites. Those who have. Desproblèmes those who are most often people who do not take basic precautions, or who have not been sufficiently attentive to their bodies. In summary, your post is unnecessarily alarmist and, in this form, untrue. Basically, as it is written, it looks like "smoking kills" on cigarette packages: "sodomy will make you sterile and incontinent" (you forgot "and send you straight to hell"). NO. The reality, as often is much more nuanced. Sodomy is a practice that requires care and vigilance. And which, I grant you, those who do not want should not be forced. As in all areas of love. No? ================================ @ Anna: Why? Did you find anything in the "life", more important or more interesting than the ass? ================================ @ Christiano: the reference to your source confirms what I thought. Your uncle, by the nature of its activity, is typically in the syndrome of "the tree that hides the. Your uncle, by the nature of its activity, is typically in the syndrome of "the tree that hides laforêt" sodomites the few who have problems come to see the multitude that goes do not contact, outcome, he sees only the minority. QED.

A link, a book title, anything, but a source please! I remain skeptical!

1 – In the anus, numerous live microorganisms that exist in that place and that their role is to contribute to the "decomposition" (I do not know if this is the appropriate term) of faeces (faeces = shit-sorry for this explanation, because I do not banish this term exists in the dictionary!) These microorganisms are found ONLY in the anus, this implies how much their presence in another place can be dangerous. So when a man enters his wife through the anus: a-these organisms can penetrate through the small hole (where he pees) and may cause him serious illness including impotence and the fact of not being fertile (this means that male fertility ans spermatozoon become unfit for the fertilization of the ovum of the woman). It becomes stréril! And that's not counting local infections and the poor wretch can not make love to his beloved because he bobo! b-after penetration into the anus, the man will surely make a small tour vagina, and that there can be dramatic. 2 – Around the anus is a sphincter muscle that works a bit automatically, by contraction-expansion, ie when you want to f ***, and we're sitting on the toilet it opens (it's psychological) but not when sitting still, it remains closed! Fortunately, because otherwise, imagine the damage! This is not a voluntary act I think it's a reflex action * (or it looks like him) is not made to receive something, iln'est not designed for anything! So when the man entered through that door! it extended to every muscle as it expands! And strength, the loss of muscle strength! As a result it fails to close completely over! Well imagine you there are people whose anal sphincter muscle does not contract any further! They are obliged to put diapers! This is not funny and plus it stink!

Super!

ahem! ok, I'll think banning sodomy in my life then! horrib is' what you say!

Yes, but it's so good …

should not be clairvoyant to think about what will happen in the spincter destroying them but you have to be perverse to practice sodomy with a woman (I do not speak of homosexuals is their problem

yes, it's a biology course with highly structured examples thank you

Finally, something sensible and intelligent to say in this topic. It is always wise to give such information to a lot of people who know nothing about this practice and fellatio and cunnilingus.

My dear, it is also practiced between two men … Anyway, thank you for the comment very unsavory, I would not die silly.

After these explanations will reflect the followers of this practice, I have to tell you, "VIVE LA Jobs."

FN you vote?

finally someone who does not trivialize sodomy as too many have tended to do today and thank you for detailed explanations as well mealtime it is not the most appetizing …

Have you ever forced a woman to abort! and why?

No ^ ^

Bah no! lol

it will not be accepted? " Certainly not. I am opposed in principle to the murder of children in the womb. I do understand that in a very small number of cases: health reasons, defects, etc. … But compelling?? I'm not Cheb Mammi is the worst form of violence against a woman, even worse than rape.

@ Sonnen, if I may, I would have to be a man not to find rape as the most abominable acts …

abortion, homosexuality, selfishness, thong, wear, individualism etc ,….

're openly homophobic and you just treat others as racist, really clears up small m.rde.

Ta-ta-ta. I do not agree on some points … Abortion and homosexuality are not generally a problem for the religious.

what connection with homosexuality and the string? it is a pity party … you were much mdrrr

Sorry, it's everything that violates your moral Islamic fundamentalist … your spiritual guide not only was his name Tariq Ramadan, by chance?

And what's your morality? Stoning, submission, sucking stones to pray before a book meaningless? I prefer to put down a girl in a bitter strng that religious crap that spews from sleeping in front of an audience who do not care what he says;)

Your examples are puzzled me – right to abortion and gay rights do not violate morality – selfish, string, individualism and wear were never called "progress"

it is immoral to save the life of a young woman leaving the abortion? Is it immoral to make others happy? Signall abuse.

At each time its evolution – the point is that "progress" like the locals – Whether it displeases people who immigrate to our country we have no problem – "the most uncomfortable go"

The Zionist antimorality leads us right to the religion of the Antichrist. But it also includes anti-racism. All the more vicious it encourages immigrants to victimize, and therefore behave as weak, impotent and that maximizes the frustration. You will notice that racism is the opposite and the perversion of respect for others recommended in the scriptures. They teach to see God in the other man, the divine spark, to welcome out of respect for God. Anti-racism taught to pose as victim, weak, whiny and projecting this weakness on a group that says prejudiced helpless victim of racism. Now we all know if we have a little experience that will inevitably come across people who will have a priori on us because of our sex / age / appearance / clothing / art and can make them change their minds by Note this behavior is still an advantage to this anti-corporation: by doing the reverse of what you sell and extol the media, you might not get it wrong a lot.

Pace that progress does not care about morals! @ Descarte0 A Prophet who married a 6 year old girl is serious and certainly not racist

The noblest of the prophets married a 6 year old daughter was not immoral at the time

thee well a Muslim!

I speak of a married couple, both working with a Foye, stability in love. Claude o: she became pregnant on the pill so apparently she did not purposely get pregnant. The fact is that now a baby growing in her belly and the husband threatened to leave if not miscarried. She, she believes her husband loves her. This husband imposes his dictatorship and blackmailed. I call that violate the freedom of women. Freedom? Is this the freedom of women in France?? To Baillamisse: I am 100% agree with you but it's not my case. Here is the link to my previous question and the person in question is "a child": http://fr.answers.yahoo.com/question/index; _ylt = Al1tpdxcFc9pJbIXIILRC5s5Agx;. _ylv = 3? Qid = 20101014142551AAROYiI to "One child" http://fr.answers.yahoo.com/question/index; _ylt = AiQGtPlL3ICnAkRLcB0E2tE5Agx;. _ylv = 3? qid = 20101016045711AAPMBwB

I do not understand this question. no free and independent woman will leave her partner to impose an abortion. Now it is true that a woman has no right either to require a child to a man against his will. if a woman decides to have a child against the wishes of his companion she must bear her own choice. it is precisely that a woman can impose its will in holding itself to have a child and assume. freedom to have or not have children is in both directions. no man has the right to impose an abortion his girlfriend but no woman has the right to impose a child to a man who does not want it. if the girlfriend of my son "fell" pregnant "by accident" I think my son and we would have great doubts about that is "an accident", it's called "making a child the back of the man. "a woman that calls itself free and independent, often this kind of dilemma. the birth of a child is decided by two.

The knitter Semitic hardly deserves the consent of the people nor the feminists. Be sure to his family we do not practice abortion! Always do what I say not as I do.

you talk about simone Bariza el Mahboula

he is not a question of freedom of the woman in this case, should not mix everything! the avortment is a right granted to women, not man! you do not want to abort sending your husband to be shit and that's it! Loude all simplment! ty not ok with it leaves and keep your pti angel he is in no question in Ms. Weil's case! in this case it is not of the GMEF let s deck bar, seriously divorce and keep your child! the choice of abortion is an option given to women for reasons yY x or just something a husband lavie nevaudrz Jamis clled'un enfantd her child, a husband jem'explique u have a moment, then c ' is not said it remains for life, a child is more precious than a husband, that's life your flesh your cotinuitéet whatever happens it will not change the fact that Jamis links will forever unchanged eternity! seriously love my man but if I was in front of a dilema with him and it gosss no regrets no I choose my gossssss! not let yourselfto either accept it as it is also the rightto go! but in no case has the right to impose on you to end the life meter that you wear! all the way I see things that's how I see them!

Let Simone Weil quiet! She gave a great service to women. To achieve this it was vilified, insulted. That couples do what they want, she is responsible for anything.

Now let me be clear with you, and always before. This morning my husband changed his mind ok? and now you coward because my story-that's your fault I suffered too much stress and makes me contractions you're looking for what has let me loose to harass me as well. And you talk about crime? You do no better than him you is even worse. Because it will assume it is obvious that he is afraid. off you you had nothing to do in life you go about harassing me and me encrusted triggers contractions at risk of losing me. So now you shut your big mouth and removes me your question or the ever believe me you will regret it

married couple, tt 2 working, financial stability but the husband is a tyrant. Balhsen6 to: You watches very well in spelling! Lol, actually Veil. Thank you so much !!!!! "a child" is your husband who takes away your own freedom! Not me, it pushes you in the head! You are subject to the will of your husband and you live under a dictatorship because he appointed thee abortion and he also makes you leave you blackmail. WATCH THE RESPONSE OF PEOPLE WHO HAVE RESPONDED TO MY QUESTION! ! They also have crazy ??????? "Beware it can go very far the harassment" is your husband who is harassing you in asking you to abort. Files a complaint against your husband forces you to abort. YOUR HUSBAND SHOULD BE ASHAMED OF HIM! TIME IS A MURDERER 'MODERN'! That being cultivated according to you? To malka: "In no case for forcing women to have abortions." The husband of the woman who forced him to abort if he leaves. This poor woman has a knife to her throat and is subject to. This poor woman has a knife to her throat and is subject to Dictatorship of the tyrant husband. It is in France, in 2010, a married couple with one dependent child, and about 2,000 € net resource. For him, a baby is not the result of love but a heavy burden that must be eliminated at all costs, without pity, without tears, without humanity, without conscience, without scruples. His wife was ordered to commit suicide using violent extraction of the embryo nestled in her womb. Malka to: "What happens in a couple's nobody!" I'm sorry but that "a child" who came here post his question in Q / rists for advice. Everything you say is neither constructive malka nor argued, all you do is criticize. If what you say is better than silence, shut up.

Divorce is not for the dogs !!!!!

Or he does not like it, simply, why else refuse to have a child, if the two are married (for a while I guess) and their situation is stable?

Simone Veil has nothing to do if the husband is an immature idiot. The law aims to empower women and let them make their own choices, not to be used as a tool of blackmail from a moron Control freak.

she leaves him and takes it …. or it aborts and remains a big con …..

Incidentally, it should not be confused with Simone Weil, philosopher died in 1943, and Simone Veil.

uh what is the relationship with Simone Veil? if a woman is married to a tyrant, she gets pregnant but does not want this baby, several solutions available to her: – she submits, and abortion remains with her husband – but she leaves abortion because she does not want a child like him (she has a job, she is more independent financially) – she keeps her baby but leaves her husband (also note that front) – she keeps her baby and her husband (his body, he can not force her to abort) you do not know their lives, their past, their relationship, so we can not judge. you can just try to advise. the 4 solutions, the 4 is likely to be excluded (as it exists but it had to be stated). there are 3 solutions to this woman, but this choice is his. and she does not hesitate to approach the associations that help women victims of husbands tyrants (to use your expression) anyway good luck to this woman, this election will probably be one of the most difficult to take in his life

why you ask questions for which you do not seek any advice, but rather seeks what is full of your senses? You choose your MR depending on your opinion. What do you dirty whore of freedom

Apparently, you're trying to serve you a story that is not yours to get some sort of response … Take care of your business! If the person above asked a question in a moment of doubt, it looks, you do not take possession of his life to show that you would be right. And as the others have said, the Veil law is a tool designed to prevent women from being imposed unwanted pregnancies … In no case for forcing women to have abortions. What happens in a couple's nobody!

It is true the right to abortion, normal. The right to start work early in the morning and end late at night. the right to prepare the lunch PEIT children the right to lead them quickly to school in the morning . the right to participate in homework at night. the right to eventually return at noon for lunch to her husband. the right to make any meal the night her husband for lunch the next day. the right to do the ironing between meals and duties of children in the evening. the right to shop for school supplies. It is true that, the husband comes home too late and can not do anything, frankly, especially if there is a football game in the TV! Thank you feminist women is changing for the better!

Then Grandma? It has not digested the liberation of women?

you, you're married to a macho!

You've been married you? Ouwa! The courage he had! He deserves a medal of honor.

The right to practice sodomy!

Grandma Ben, you've got big on the inside to be born too early to have known freedom? Will think of your granddaughters who can wear pants !!!!!

Vatican: "urgency of the children to stop the Islamization in Europe" The European Catholics are pressed by the Vatican to have children to stop the Islamization of the continent. This tip is the signed father Piero Gheddo, a spokesperson Vatican officials. The father Piero Gheddo is the finding of a very low birthrate among Catholic populations in Europe, compared to the number of births in homes Muslims. "This issue must be taken seriously," insists one who is reputable and considered at the Institute of Foreign Missions of the Vatican, an alcove of missionaries. "From a demographic standpoint, as it is clear that Italians are fewer and fewer in number and decrease of approximately 120 000-130 000 persons per year due to abortion and divorce, this same phenomenon exists to the contrary the people of immigrant background who arrive in Italy, 200 000 per year, half of Muslims who were then more children than. "From a demographic standpoint, as it is clear that the Italians are less numerous in number and decrease of nearly 120 000-130 000 persons per year due to abortion and divorce, even conversely phenomenon exists for populations of immigrant origin who arrived in Italy, about 200,000 per year, half of Muslims who were then more children than leschrétiens. "He adds:" If we consider ourselves a Christian country He must live in a Christian way, and this would help us solve our demographic problems. http://24heuresactu.com/2010/09/08/vatican-urgence-de-faire-des-enfants-pour-stopper-lislamisation -in-europe /

Atheists can get started?

with my boyfriend, we attempted the shot several times and it works not their thing: I'm still not pregnant!

And the priests who say that why do not they have children?

Christians prefer to have done everything in Africa … they do not know how to

That seems perfectly coherent, indeed. But do not do what he said the Vatican did not say … "To stop Islamisation". The Vatican says simply that the West is losing the pedals since he de-Christianized, and that strengthens the Muslims in their belief that we are depraved!

I've got nothing against Islam. Girls tarpaulin inaccessible and frustrated guys, it is our business.

homos too?

I hope he is ready to lead by example!

To continue the excellent discussion of @ Remo, why no one thinks all those nuns trapped in convent and which would surely excellent surrogate mother. For my part, I am quite willing to be sperm donor volunteer. No sacrifice is big enough to defend a just cause!

There may be better to do ….

I would not because po c (is stupid and idiotic as unequal

And the cushy Gheddo-Pedro Pinocchio will stop Islam?

pity that your Vatican did not specify with whom? because as you go there now that the Muslim population that the word is the opposite of what you made (a Muslim will continue to have children because to him again and make it even more Muslims on Earth and it will happily with all the women converted to Islam so it is better for the Vatican that prohibits your converged women and Islam is what is in those strings ????? that does not make it for sex ????? A +

I watch my step mother when she is breastfeeding my half brother and I saw his body through the keyhole of the bathroom, she made a good ** t * I swear. the bed of their room is in the right of the door is for ca I see nothing. and I heard nothing as if nothing happens between them! is what they make love? the morning and why they act as if nothing happened?

… and if you let them alone? basically, it's not your history! … and I do not think you'd be happy if you were spied on while you frolic ….!

They use condoms to preserving the hydraulic shock absorbers of your indiscretions is little voyeur!

're still in your pee-poo phase? and then it does not concern you, brat … you've not heard of privacy?

Because their room is soundproof … well since they had a child, something happened between father and stepmother, but if the birth is recent, it is possible that their antics are momentarily in standby. Reassure yourself, gnash the bed again.

You do not patent your colleges to revise?

hello little voyeur lovemaking Dad does not concern you and also they have the delicacy to wait until you are asleep you should be ashamed you have at least 10 or 12 years doing your homework is more exciting c

First, many home have soundproof rooms. Secondly, the sex life of your father does not quite look at you and treat your step-mother of a bitch does not prove that your immaturity and your lack of respect that choice. Third aged one bit and one day you too will want one that you left in peace with your sex life!