Posts Tagged ‘FISH’

Lack Of A Few Days And Pump.?

Wednesday, July 14th, 2010

Hello! I have to go soon another week without my daughter (16 months old) that breastfeeding (once in the morning, once at night). My question is: should I bother with a breast milk? That foul machine the double disadvantage of being unpleasant and cumbersome. In addition, long ago I can no longer take the equivalent of a feeding at once. However, I'm afraid of risking a bottleneck if I do not draw anything for five days. 1-Do you think I must take this breast pump? 2-If yes, how often should I take (or what size) to avoid risking congestion? Or leaks …? 3-Once back: should I myself often in my daughter or do I limit myself to twice a day? Thank you very much for those who have experience in this area ? Spell 16 months and a half @ Emmanuelle: uh, its age, my daughter would not drink milk powder, but the semi-skimmed … Why would I not made the choice, would you support your answer, please? if, during my. Why should not I made the choice, would you support your answer, please? Otherwise during monabsence, it will have something to drink, do not worry:) @ Materials: why in fact could you clarify, please?

No experience.

I will take your advice to draw milk, five days is a long

Anyway you do not have much choice if you breastfeed your daughter and you t'absentes you must shoot your milk! If you are trying dice now seeping milk powder in a bib to accustom If … you do not know what to call a PMI and asked to speak to a pediatric nurse who will advise you.

I have no experience with breastfeeding for longer but the answers :-) I would advise you to go on the site of the league Leache I think you have all your answers

I think if you want to continue breastfeeding your return you must use the pull milk during these five days I do not think now is the bottleneck for its lesser quantities by cons if there is more demand there will be more milk …. you should get the amount has almost drunk with your daughter (morning and evening so as not to lose pace in milk) and your return business as usual. good week and good luck

You have not yet rid of your dreadful machine? ! 1 – No or yes, depending on 2-2 – Between 0 and full. It's your breast, no one can know in advance. You can very well be clogged after a few hours or not be disturbed at all, even after several days. You have to have some idea of what to expect based on your own experience: if your chip ever skips a feeding, what happens to you? 1 (the return) – so if you think it is 0 or 1, you can relieve yourself by hand, so you do not take the craft. IF you think it's full, you take your suitcase. 3 – Who knows … In any case, to 16 months of lactation does not disappear in one week. Even if there is a slight, it quickly returns to normal, or you with a little help cure galactogene. Then you have several options ==> Choice 1: you Pepette sulks and makes you a strike . In this case, you will persevere without getting mad, it will not last forever. Choice 2: Pepette makes up your. Option 2: Pepette tonabsence makes up for and plays the baby suckling glu-glu 15 times / day like this, it will not last forever. Option 3: Pepette re-head like you never left. Explains well your daughter why you go, you have no choice, etc. … story that you prepare for every 2. If you have other questions, you know where to find me. Kisses!

Feeding And Fertilization?

Friday, May 21st, 2010

Hello, I breastfeed my son for three months and am looking for (already) to design the second. I wondered if, while you breastfeed, you can easily fall pregnant or if it has no connection? Thanks for your answers, I have not had my back layer Thanks whatever happens I ' arrest him not to breastfeed provided. I'll just take my pain with patience!

it has nothing. If you have your period, it off again as 40.

There is a decline in fertility during breastfeeding (which is one reason why queens nonlactating ;-) ), but it is not strictly a means of contraception, particularly when the Breastfeeding is not exclusive. That's why we advise women who breastfeed but do not want to have another child in the immediate use of regular contraception.

Breastfeeding does not protect a pregnancy so it is possible that you falls pregnant even while nursing. If you breastfeed exclusively and on demand, it could be longer but once feedings become less frequent and are smaller, your fertility returns to normal, that's why we often prescribe the pill for breastfeeding mothers who not want a second kinder in stride. The back layer is not the same thing, many believe Mom is safe because it had not had that famous back layer and flabbergasted on hearing pregnancy. Your ovulation occurs even if you have no rules. So you can go to practice, and fingers crossed that it works.

Some women rely on breastfeeding to the LAM method (method of breastfeeding and amenorrhea): For this they must: Feeding the child within, exclusively or almost exclusively Not having had their menstrual period since then Do not be beyond the sixth month postpartum Frequently, at the request rather than a fixed time without giving a bottle or pacifier Avoiding long periods between feedings, day and night Without giving additional method would work at 98% If you are in this case there is little chance that you get pregnant … BUT, it depends biensur women … some could even get pregnant while breastfeeding! and others like me will not succeed … That three months I stopped the pill, but as I was breastfeeding my son still has a twice a day, not ovulating … He decided to wean 15 days ago, waiting to see if my period will come … Anyway all that to say that breastfeeding is supposed to reduce the fertility rate was due. Anyway all that to say that nursing is supposed to reduce fertility, because of the high rate deprolactine ovulation is often blocked. but good as in many situations, this also depends on women … However it would be a shame to stop breastfeeding for a second … Just share the principle that if you will not fall pregnant straight away, it may be because your body believes it is not the right time for you and your son too … So here I advise you to to continue with baby, and it regularly once a month a pregnancy test and then voila … Good luck!

it depends on women, says a breast (I say intensive, due to a feeding every 2 hours day and night) may serve as a means of contraception, but it happens regularly that breastfeeding women be protected and thinking fall pregnant before the return of layers without meaning to. then yes the nursing plays a role in female hormones and therefore fertility, breastfeeding now three months I do not think that much. I'll board of allésur the site leche league, they have very good articles, I remember having read about it and also on the coallaitement possible thereafter.

My back had my coat in the fourth month of my daughter, because I'm breastfeeding exclusively and on demand day and night. It's been almost a year since I breastfeed. My daughter still sometimes head once or twice at night (after 2 pm, once at 7 am), she still head throughout the day, even if it eats other things, she still loves to suck a lot, Sucking a big thing in the morning to 10 o'clock, a small feed at noon, a small feed before naps, feeding a small consolation here and there, a big feed at night to sleep. And so I'm still not pregnant. I'm 38 years old, so it must play too. Already at the base, I'm not necessarily very fertile, so if we add the breast, it reduces even more. Even if we can not give the rule in this area. There are so many cases.

I have breastfed my son exclusively until six months then he started to eat and I still breastfeed (now only once a day) it will be 13 months. And I got pregnant when he was 9 months. I knew that up to six months was difficult, but even it happened quickly breastfeeding.

Big Question Turkey: Is That I Am Pregnant?

Wednesday, April 7th, 2010

seriously, I had my period March 1, it is April 6th and still nothing, from how late should I worry when he must take the test, I breastfeed and I had my back Layer 3 months after childbirth

come see me as I examine you! Non-huh, go see a doctor.

Test Effective in pharmacy one day of gestation!

You can do a test from the 1st day of delayed menstruation and with the 1st morning urine. The fact that you breastfeed you do not protect any pregnancy but it may be that this is only your cycle that is a little crazy this month.

you can make the test even after a day late and breastfeeding does not get pregnant

why do not you test clear blue instead of asking us questions or wrong answer to give you anyway turns your brain to go stp turkey

Well, if you do not contraception, it's time to start to worry. Test on the first day of delay. If you've Cerazette is normal what did not rule. In both cases, it is sometimes a bit messy after childbirth.

Breastfeeding. Nothing In The Breasts!?

Tuesday, March 9th, 2010

hello, here I gave birth January 15, I breastfeed my cycle returned on 06 mars then a few days ago but I have the impression that I have no milk because the 1st is when I take my milk does not flow then I could fill 150ml. and the 2nd because my son will not stop crying was the impression he claims he is not satisfied … would there a coincidence between the return cycle and the lack of milk . thank you

Hi, I think of a small growth spurt for your loulou. Where a mother who would give the bottle to her child'll include a dose of milk. You just have to you put your son in it to increase your production milk. Your breasts are very soft, you really feel have anything inside. If you put in each time he calls after 2 -3 days to increase your production will peak and will pass. There are several peaks of growth in the duration of breastfeeding. Here is a link below . I do not think your back layers and lack of milk had an impact on your production. Good breastfeeding;)

More than a growth spurt, I thought rather a change of milk … it happens regularly, your milk changes its nature to suit the needs of the baby, and when it happens, there is a moment of hesitation during which thou hast less. We must get some rest, drink lots and start breastfeeding demand: the more your baby will suck milk and your milk production increases. Your milk should go 2 or 3 days. Especially, do not your supplements with baby bibs, that's how we gun breastfeeding.

Coucou Ca My Friends Made One?

Sunday, January 10th, 2010

ca fait pa mal time that we sai pa paella! jespere that vs going well! question jai jai delivered the month of May, jai had 40jours back layer after, since nothing pa rule, my gygy m have said that to a nursing woman c normal (my case too) my baby is 8 months, I l nursing tjr! jai overview this morning my rules that are rrivera pourtan jallaite tjr my bb, it sucked avans com pa c normal because it eats some vegetables, but good jaimerai whether c davoir my normal rules encort once? ed for the breastfeeding, it is little I breastfeed my bb during menstruation? dsl for this but I seen your savoir.merci response. thank you my friends, also glad to return with you!

it means that your period normally cost, and you can give your baby the breast even when you got your period, good luck

Cuckoo! Actually it's been a while since you're not coming. Delighted to see you! To answer your question I breastfed my son 10 months 1 / 2, natural weaning, and had my back to layer 1 1 / 2 months after my birth. Too bad! And I reassured the rules do not breastfeed her baby !!!!!! And fortunately, imagine if we had to stop 1 time per month to nurse our little ones that go wrong outright breastfeeding!! lol Are you resume contraception or not? If yes your disorder may be due to that. You should go see your gynecologist, as you've had your back layer and that your rules are for anarchy. Good early evening!

I have given birth in late July and I had my period in October since it is every month, I admit it's stupid pinball I thought we were going as we had not had a menstrual I am tjs no cons contraception, but that's another story

Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs


Related Blogs

Difference Between Screening Embryos And Abortion?

Thursday, October 15th, 2009

the same people who are indignant against the potential excesses of about Sarkozy to sort embryos, were indignant at the way even if we wanted to challenge the abortion. Ultimately this is not the same thing: the elimination of an unwanted embryo. If we grant the individual has a right to destroy an embryo, not a state why could he not? "I said that – I do not question the right to abortion. – I do not preach the eugenics I just put some opinions before their contradictions.

Because it's super dangerous, imagine the return of a dictator or even any thinking person to do well: we select the most intelligent, most beautiful physics, better bodies, better breeding … Why not clone so that's it!

I invite you, boing, to read or reread "Brave New World" of Aldous Huxley. You will find no doubt about it and / or answers to your questions.

It has nothing to do both. Abortion is not intended to select the best, but do not have children at all.

The behavior of an individual is not dictated by its genes but by upbringing, environment ,…, is where the bottom lies. This is not the "abortion" that embryo that disturbs people, but would rely on what to do, as opposed to a disease or malformation, the deviant behavior are not included in the genes.

I was mad that sarko said, but it sort of embryos is not the abortion of cattle not the same TA QUESTIONcontradiction or provocation?

I suppose you speak of "gene" of pedophilia, and how you think, this gene? You're a great biologist who understood everything and that is where to look? And a screening embryos before relocation is for extremely debilitating genetic diseases (it appears that you have no people with such sick around you). Fertilization occurs in vitro, not in the belly of the woman. And in addition, there are only about 20% of implants that result in pregnancy. An abortion when it is spontaneous and not due to nature, to my knowledge, unless I missed an episode, it is practiced in the belly of a woman with multiple methods (which I do not know specifically). Whatever the reason, it is always traumatic for the woman and not a perfect method of contraception. And sometimes, unfortunately, the woman is forced to consider abortion, because of the monstrous evils which is reached the child she expects, and that most of the time, not to live more than a few. And sometimes, unfortunately, the woman is forced to consider abortion, because of the monstrous evils which is reached the child she expects, and that most of the time, not to live more than a few weeks or quelquesheures sometimes in dreadful suffering. Thence to systematically eliminate embryos before replantation under the false pretext that they have the gene for pedophilia or serial killer, why not, there is an abyss …. especially if it ' is a state that allows it. After all, each couple is free to do what he wants from his own embryos, I think ………..

Be careful not to confuse the right to abortion and eugenics. The right to abortion does to the maximum torque that can be thousands of reason for not having this child. As in eugenics, is not allowed the right to choose. it is imposed by "criteria" that tend to perfection, if this last is the least ….. The "defect" as the syndrome can be detected reliably and it is true that before the poverty minding persons of this type in France, it may be preferable to choose abortion. Do not forget that we are not immortal and that often our children are surviving. While Sarkozy's remarks tend to emphasize that all our behaviors are linked to our genes. I do not know if it's genetic does not fuck a train to school or have wanted to move my tank to 32 years …. In any case, I had all the chances of go to pot with Niko ….

Related Blogs

Difference Between Screening Embryos And Abortion?

Sunday, October 4th, 2009

the same people who are indignant against the potential excesses of about Sarkozy to sort embryos, were indignant at the way even if we wanted to challenge the abortion. Ultimately this is not the same thing: the elimination of an unwanted embryo. If we grant the individual has a right to destroy an embryo, not a state why could he not? "I said that – I do not question the right to abortion. – I do not preach the eugenics I just put some opinions before their contradictions.

Because it's super dangerous, imagine the return of a dictator or even any thinking person to do well: we select the most intelligent, most beautiful physics, better bodies, better breeding … Why not clone so that's it!

I invite you, boing, to read or reread "Brave New World" of Aldous Huxley. You will find no doubt about it and / or answers to your questions.

It has nothing to do both. Abortion is not intended to select the best, but do not have children at all.

The behavior of an individual is not dictated by its genes but by upbringing, environment ,…, is where the bottom lies. This is not the "abortion" that embryo that disturbs people, but would rely on what to do, as opposed to a disease or malformation, the deviant behavior are not included in the genes.

I was mad that sarko said, but it sort of embryos is not the abortion of cattle not the same TA QUESTIONcontradiction or provocation?

I suppose you speak of "gene" of pedophilia, and how you think, this gene? You're a great biologist who understood everything and that is where to look? And a screening embryos before relocation is for extremely debilitating genetic diseases (it appears that you have no people with such sick around you). Fertilization occurs in vitro, not in the belly of the woman. And in addition, there are only about 20% of implants that result in pregnancy. An abortion when it is spontaneous and not due to nature, to my knowledge, unless I missed an episode, it is practiced in the belly of a woman with multiple methods (which I do not know specifically). Whatever the reason, it is always traumatic for the woman and not a perfect method of contraception. And sometimes, unfortunately, the woman is forced to consider abortion, because of the monstrous evils which is reached the child she expects, and that most of the time, not to live more than a few. And sometimes, unfortunately, the woman is forced to consider abortion, because of the monstrous evils which is reached the child she expects, and that most of the time, not to live more than a few weeks or quelquesheures sometimes in dreadful suffering. Thence to systematically eliminate embryos before replantation under the false pretext that they have the gene for pedophilia or serial killer, why not, there is an abyss …. especially if it ' is a state that allows it. After all, each couple is free to do what he wants from his own embryos, I think ………..

Related Blogs

Categories
Search
Bookmarks