For Those Who Defend The "work Value" What Place You Give To Non-market Work?
Thursday, October 28th, 2010And first, you're only aware of what non-market work? When grandparents keep their young children is a non-market work. When a mother breastfeeds her child is a non-market work. As an avid garden grows tomatoes is a true non-market work. Etc., etc.. Every aspect of life is not taken into account by our economists. For it is "non-market". How much would amount GDP non-profit if we could quantify it? Did you not aware that pensions, unemployment benefits are many and varied as the equivalent of the salary of this "non-market work?" Ah, but true. .. this work does not generate earnings which lands in the pockets of a shareholder. it is to despise the non-market work? The company would it be without him? What do you think? @ GUERNICA Yes, knowing that it can calculate what it costs. For cons it is difficult to calculate what it brings to society. Obviously it does not report to. Obviously it does nNo shareholder report. @ Sun Zi They pay taxes. Zarli @ ☼ ☼ Formatting seller of spirits is terrible. When someone does good work, nanny or gardener for himself, he does there is no monetary exchange. And yet it is a job that takes time. Nobody seems to recognize it. For cons when it comes to hiring someone under the 'personal services' is recorded.'s Economy' non-monetary 'is ignored. Why exactly? @ Micdal This should be taken into account in economics. For it is a productive activity that meets a need.
in non-market work, there are also social workers, right?
Non-market work? You've been in front of a machine eight hours a day? You know what it is to go home so exhausted that you can not even take care of your kid because you did two hours underground on the morning and two hours underground on the night in more than eight hours at work ? Bourgeois goes!
pee and poo and also c is a non-market work? pfff you are laughable!
Labor péripatétitiennes either (as some would say QRiste Montargis), yet no known shareholders …
I do not understand the question. Especially as good, gardeners or nannies exist as freelancers, companies or craftsmen. There is more service than work itself. I still do not understand the question, and even less where you want to come. @ Well my answer is manifold: 1 – because the policy is to manage community resources and no time for the individual. Time is money? Yes same here, which could bring the state to consider my answer. 2 2 – because no one has yet passed a law requiring us to seek a licensed professional. But it could happen. Tomatoes -> service health inspection and / or customs control Mômes -> DDASS, followed by good parenting as the model K225bis. Car Mechanics -> roadworthiness (this is done) etc.. Fortunately we still have some freedoms. Besides, if a craftsman spends 25 hours doing the "figure" it is usually in 8 hours, nobody will blame.
Create, produce or simply to serve in a market devoid of any connotation is that the longer a soda company, which gives it its binder, his humanity. It seems to escape many who do not see where pécadilles while s 'acts of real human relationships. Curious world who only thinks in numbers and more cost
But do not confuse volunteering or in helping with the work when I'm "home" is just a choice, it has nothing to do with non-market work is a calculation on the value money now I knit a cardigan, because in the trade I can not find pure wool, while the lifetime of the object has nothing to do with what I can find on the market. But this means infinitely more expensive to make a garment that you buy … so I bought the same for yourself if it is profitable to black no hesitation if I do
can we call "work" activity-controllers officials who spend time pretending to annoy us with the money of our work we flew by without stopping taxes more?