Fatigue but also by obligation when traveling, I will be induced to leave my baby and I can not get my milk from which the resort to artificial milk. I do not know if it is harmful to his little belly. So far (six weeks) he did not have colic. A little bit sore one day and that's it. It happened very quickly. Consequence of a temporary mixed feeding? Thank you!

Of course not. By cons, it is not clear that he accepts!

It is not until the formula is bad for baby's tummy, but only that it does not digest the same way as breast milk. Nobody can know in advance how to react the digestive system of your baby … It may well have to digest it as colic, spit up, be constipated … The biggest risk is that of nipple confusion. It is possible that after having tasted a bottle baby does not want or do not know more breastfeed. Some babies pass easily from breast to bottle and the bottle to the breast, while for others it takes is a bottle for all haywire. This is not inevitable but it is a real possibility. Some will tell you that it does not risk anything, they did not worry … Good for them! Mostly it's true that it goes well, but be aware that there are still a risk (and when it falls on you …). It is more prudent to offer milk in another way (syringe, pipette, glass, cup, …), especially if. ), Especially for troubleshooting sic'est only once or twice. Finds time to rest is important. A nap at the same time that baby and you're off again! Courage!

Hello, I exclusively breastfeed my children for three months and by the fourth month I included a bottle of milk powder, the fourth month. No worries. My children are easily took a bottle. At worst if you can, ask Dad to give him. That said INFORMED near you in your / your pediatrician when a brand of milk to make.

Not even had a small stroke of seals soft and not too dark?? I'd be surprised.

You just do a mixed feeding which is sometimes recommended by physicians because the mother has insufficient milk or mixed you finally stopped breastfeeding because it is a step baby will probably be in a few months than bottle … If you're afraid of collic … Just watch the milk powder that you give to your baby … and especially the quantity of milk. DRINK bottle is easier, so baby can take large amounts of milk … or drinking too fast … and that could give him a stomach ache … So as a mom you see how he likes it or not the bottle or not he likes his pacifier … and if you mixed from time to time and that baby is growing well … OF COURSE be vigilant in relation to colic and constipation mostly … My children have always been mixed … and most important is to not change the milk powder … because it can cause constipation. By cons, when you give him the bottle you limit your lactation and therefore eventually you'll get a little less milk …

You need not justify yourself, give the bib when you can not breastfeed and if you think he has collic then chooses a milk thickens.

bin at the beginning I gave a bib from time to time although I was breastfeeding exclusively to be able to rest had opted for the rubber pacifier nuk nikel been no confusion. after the choice of milk I know what I had but there's always a risk to her stomach because you can not know in advance how his body will react. then sit back and sleep when baby sleeps and other household leaves aside … me either I can not get my milk and I've been full.

I must not breastfeed my daughter and the doctor give me medication to stop lactation but it makes me sick. How can I stop naturally?

Why do I breastfeed your daughter does not understand … There will be no rival milk, milk you produce a tailor-made for your daughter! I do not understand why more non-stop medication?? Is nipple stimulation (suction, pressure, touching …) that induces and maintains lactation. After a period of about 15 days without suck your metabolism will begin a working natural to stop lactation. (Better than a treatment against nature) Do not be fooled by an accomplice of the Pharmaceutical Business Lobby and check for nearly another doctor before starting anything-whatsoever.

Hello, I stopped and naturally without medication. I did not do. I had at the beginning of lactogenesis but do not pulled, inevitably it slows the next. After one week, nothing. Just pay attention to misbehavior. Good luck

Hundred million. This is the approximate number of abortions performed in the West, including Russia, since the legalization of abortion – legalization occurred in most of our old country, during the 70s. It is ten times the number of victims of Nazi concentration camp system, double the number killed during the Second World War, roughly the number of victims of Communism and Soviet Russia, Maoist China combined. In terms of demographic, so it's a catastrophe without precedent. And, incredibly, this was done mostly in silence. not a whisper, or the woman is almost a machine, killing far more efficient than humans and for good reason: by refusing to give life, it takes away. Drac @ Michel Fruges … democracy in all the worst crap are always in the name of the property, abortion, eugenics, GM, humanitarian war … propaganda invented the great mercy killing …. no?

These babies were not born. It's nothing of a crime

I think it is better to remove the "life" to be still not done that to abandon it later or bad deal. But that's my opinion and everyone has the right to have his …

Oh my poor … Dealing with so much ignorance … Do you know that before 14 weeks, it is not a living being? This is a bunch of cells. This is not a crime, since he has no conscience, it does not exist as a human being, this is only part of the female body! Scientists say it is indisputable! If I take your argument Sterile to the end, we can say Otis tumor (heap cell in the body of the woman) is murder … And if the woman decides to abort, it is is a reason. It sure is better to ban abortion and leave the poor kids growing up in poverty. Besides clandestine abortions, which kill thousands of women who, they are real people.

This is the result of overpopulation? Non.Il it is no concrete reason to commit such an act.

This does not surprise me to see that most people you meet are that normal … In most Western countries, the embryo is not considered "alive", we consider the fetus as a living being until the eighth week. The de-Christianization has been through it, the Church no longer has a say, abortion is legal and widely accepted in France for 35 years. If you have a religious view, it remains a terrible crime against innocent people, secular law can never change that …

I think we should fight the problem at its root, ie, unwanted pregnancies, this will prevent a woman to be in this predicament where it must take a choice.

When there is a tragedy but when there are 100 million is a statistic! Otherwise it is a serious )))))) genocide that dare not speak its name under the guise it takes responsibility away from sex while the means of contraception are many and varied, cheap and easy access and this, not to mention advertising campaigns … In France every year they shortened the lives of about 200,000 embryos.

crime? "I do not want to enter this debate. historic failure? If we judge that these are tens of millions of soldiers who fail to call for future wars against Islam or the south, eventually. Again that modern weapons make it largely useless mass armies, type 14-18.

A blessing for humanity to survive. We are already 6 billion. But I am not for abortion but for contraception.

"It's ten times the number of victims of Nazi concentration camp system" Raymond Barre had added that it was more serious "because it did not affect only Jews, but also innocent French"

It's still pretty funny this perpetual comparison with the Holocaust and World War II … M'enfin good if it amuses. For the rest of the abortion law is obvious, recall the situation before the law, abortions existed and the number of abortions was not negligible but in sometimes appalling conditions. By cons that I can not understand is how we can be to 200,000 abortions a year with contraception and condoms ….

do we not told that breastfeeding is a contraceptive?

no it is absolutely not a contraceptive! one of my friends got pregnant while she was breastfeeding her daughter only 5 months. And she had her menses barely a month after his birth.

You can get pregnant when you are breastfeeding, it's rare but it happens. I breastfed eight months I've never had a period. It's been one month since I quit and I still waiting! You should do with your gynecologist if your bleeding is normal. Good breastfeeding

No, breastfeeding is not a method of contraception. If your bleeding correspond to a return of the layer, you can get pregnant. So consult a doctor who will tell you a contraceptive method appropriate to your case

2-3% of women can get pregnant despite breastfeeding exclusf; LAM

well yes when placing breast implants and that they should breastfeed her baby, it's doable? or they should have them removed

implants are placed behind the mammary gland or behind the muscle … so they can breastfeed without concern … the only constraint is the way in which the implants are placed … inframammary, and the armpits, do not worry … by areolar (cutting a portion of the areola to move the implant), then breastfeeding is not possible, because the milk ducts are cut …. so. .. when you get implants and that plans to have children, you must talk to her …. chir

Silicone babies … hummm ….

The areola is moved only in cases of breast reduction, not when there prosthesis. (A prosthesis would not pass through an opening so small! ") Those are actually slipped under the gland as it would put a bedspread on a pillow and pajamas under her pillow: it mixes it, it stacks ! Here

I speak of a married couple, both working with a Foye, stability in love. Claude o: she became pregnant on the pill so apparently she did not purposely get pregnant. The fact is that now a baby growing in her belly and the husband threatened to leave if not miscarried. She, she believes her husband loves her. This husband imposes his dictatorship and blackmailed. I call that violate the freedom of women. Freedom? Is this the freedom of women in France?? To Baillamisse: I am 100% agree with you but it's not my case. Here is the link to my previous question and the person in question is "a child": http://fr.answers.yahoo.com/question/index; _ylt = Al1tpdxcFc9pJbIXIILRC5s5Agx;. _ylv = 3? Qid = 20101014142551AAROYiI to "One child" http://fr.answers.yahoo.com/question/index; _ylt = AiQGtPlL3ICnAkRLcB0E2tE5Agx;. _ylv = 3? qid = 20101016045711AAPMBwB

I do not understand this question. no free and independent woman will leave her partner to impose an abortion. Now it is true that a woman has no right either to require a child to a man against his will. if a woman decides to have a child against the wishes of his companion she must bear her own choice. it is precisely that a woman can impose its will in holding itself to have a child and assume. freedom to have or not have children is in both directions. no man has the right to impose an abortion his girlfriend but no woman has the right to impose a child to a man who does not want it. if the girlfriend of my son "fell" pregnant "by accident" I think my son and we would have great doubts about that is "an accident", it's called "making a child the back of the man. "a woman that calls itself free and independent, often this kind of dilemma. the birth of a child is decided by two.

The knitter Semitic hardly deserves the consent of the people nor the feminists. Be sure to his family we do not practice abortion! Always do what I say not as I do.

you talk about simone Bariza el Mahboula

he is not a question of freedom of the woman in this case, should not mix everything! the avortment is a right granted to women, not man! you do not want to abort sending your husband to be shit and that's it! Loude all simplment! ty not ok with it leaves and keep your pti angel he is in no question in Ms. Weil's case! in this case it is not of the GMEF let s deck bar, seriously divorce and keep your child! the choice of abortion is an option given to women for reasons yY x or just something a husband lavie nevaudrz Jamis clled'un enfantd her child, a husband jem'explique u have a moment, then c ' is not said it remains for life, a child is more precious than a husband, that's life your flesh your cotinuitéet whatever happens it will not change the fact that Jamis links will forever unchanged eternity! seriously love my man but if I was in front of a dilema with him and it gosss no regrets no I choose my gossssss! not let yourselfto either accept it as it is also the rightto go! but in no case has the right to impose on you to end the life meter that you wear! all the way I see things that's how I see them!

Let Simone Weil quiet! She gave a great service to women. To achieve this it was vilified, insulted. That couples do what they want, she is responsible for anything.

Now let me be clear with you, and always before. This morning my husband changed his mind ok? and now you coward because my story-that's your fault I suffered too much stress and makes me contractions you're looking for what has let me loose to harass me as well. And you talk about crime? You do no better than him you is even worse. Because it will assume it is obvious that he is afraid. off you you had nothing to do in life you go about harassing me and me encrusted triggers contractions at risk of losing me. So now you shut your big mouth and removes me your question or the ever believe me you will regret it

married couple, tt 2 working, financial stability but the husband is a tyrant. Balhsen6 to: You watches very well in spelling! Lol, actually Veil. Thank you so much !!!!! "a child" is your husband who takes away your own freedom! Not me, it pushes you in the head! You are subject to the will of your husband and you live under a dictatorship because he appointed thee abortion and he also makes you leave you blackmail. WATCH THE RESPONSE OF PEOPLE WHO HAVE RESPONDED TO MY QUESTION! ! They also have crazy ??????? "Beware it can go very far the harassment" is your husband who is harassing you in asking you to abort. Files a complaint against your husband forces you to abort. YOUR HUSBAND SHOULD BE ASHAMED OF HIM! TIME IS A MURDERER 'MODERN'! That being cultivated according to you? To malka: "In no case for forcing women to have abortions." The husband of the woman who forced him to abort if he leaves. This poor woman has a knife to her throat and is subject to. This poor woman has a knife to her throat and is subject to Dictatorship of the tyrant husband. It is in France, in 2010, a married couple with one dependent child, and about 2,000 € net resource. For him, a baby is not the result of love but a heavy burden that must be eliminated at all costs, without pity, without tears, without humanity, without conscience, without scruples. His wife was ordered to commit suicide using violent extraction of the embryo nestled in her womb. Malka to: "What happens in a couple's nobody!" I'm sorry but that "a child" who came here post his question in Q / rists for advice. Everything you say is neither constructive malka nor argued, all you do is criticize. If what you say is better than silence, shut up.

Divorce is not for the dogs !!!!!

Or he does not like it, simply, why else refuse to have a child, if the two are married (for a while I guess) and their situation is stable?

Simone Veil has nothing to do if the husband is an immature idiot. The law aims to empower women and let them make their own choices, not to be used as a tool of blackmail from a moron Control freak.

she leaves him and takes it …. or it aborts and remains a big con …..

Incidentally, it should not be confused with Simone Weil, philosopher died in 1943, and Simone Veil.

uh what is the relationship with Simone Veil? if a woman is married to a tyrant, she gets pregnant but does not want this baby, several solutions available to her: – she submits, and abortion remains with her husband – but she leaves abortion because she does not want a child like him (she has a job, she is more independent financially) – she keeps her baby but leaves her husband (also note that front) – she keeps her baby and her husband (his body, he can not force her to abort) you do not know their lives, their past, their relationship, so we can not judge. you can just try to advise. the 4 solutions, the 4 is likely to be excluded (as it exists but it had to be stated). there are 3 solutions to this woman, but this choice is his. and she does not hesitate to approach the associations that help women victims of husbands tyrants (to use your expression) anyway good luck to this woman, this election will probably be one of the most difficult to take in his life

why you ask questions for which you do not seek any advice, but rather seeks what is full of your senses? You choose your MR depending on your opinion. What do you dirty whore of freedom

Apparently, you're trying to serve you a story that is not yours to get some sort of response … Take care of your business! If the person above asked a question in a moment of doubt, it looks, you do not take possession of his life to show that you would be right. And as the others have said, the Veil law is a tool designed to prevent women from being imposed unwanted pregnancies … In no case for forcing women to have abortions. What happens in a couple's nobody!

chances are that the FN d by 2045, is also of agreement? LOL You talk about a party of arrears !!!!! That morons who take 35 years longer than others to understand the rights of … man, woman .. etc. …. vitriol … fortunately you're not No you would have been reached frontist torture of French … Sorry that my question make you feel miserable … in fact abuse reported for insulting … casimir abuse reported to inability to read. … Aloi vitriol that one does the basic and all the same …. the average first year, the second person singular verb form sees his reward of an S at the end … I understand everything you say … the problem is that you can not write … it is all … back to school.

FN already was not a credible source would corroborate what you said was good Allouez … Knowing your bias and your bullshit, the Harpy Deuxio; have 35 years of hindsight is better than 35 of which 14 chronic errors It's not really serious … that has sealed the FN in France it is the quartet Giscard-Mitterrand-Chirac-Sarkozy right? LOL @ adding sorry to use words you do not control … Well if not instead of procrastinating (Pignole) your sources? @ Ah you got it just like cons-argument? Funny I do not ever report spelling errors … But it is probably because I have more to say .. the substance and form you'll notice that put you over 30 minutes to find the foootes. .. brief avoid giving advice, you're just nothing to say Aloi was a typo but I guess easily that you do not know what it is … You have no brain … go back in your niche

Abuse reported to glorify drugs.

Read on the website Front page of Our ideas, Program, Family and Children: Policy of respect and acceptance of life legislation in place since the law Giscard-Chirac-Veil does not meet the objectives originally set by the legislature : protecting the lives and respond to the plight of women seeking abortion. Today 220 000 abortions are still performed each official year in France. • It is therefore a priority to establish a policy on families and home life. The prenatal adoption, the establishment of a parental income, the definition of a legal and social status for the mother and the adjustment of allowances are reserved for French families practical ways to reduce the number of abortions and boost French birth rate. • Along with these new measures for the use and protection of the family, we pledge to ask the French, by referendum at the end of the quinquennium of. • Along with these new measures for the use and protection of the family, we pledge to ask the French, by referendum at the end of the quinquennium depromouvoir a modern nation concerned about respecting human dignity by registration in the texts that underlie its existence and development, the sanctity of life and affirmation of the human right to be legally protected from conception to natural death.

I adopted a baby .. my neighbor told me that there is a drug in order to breastfeed and have milk in a Manner as natural. Is it true? and if that is true you know the name of the drug?

after an abortion at 04 months what to choose as a means of contraception. I just had my period. thank you

An abortion at 4 months of pregnancy? It is not illegal? Finally, contraception, good hood reassure you.

Implanon if thou borne! And fellatio!

The pill. You took what before?

Only a gynecologist is best able to advise you better your situation.

I advise you the good old pill, but also go see a gyneco until your appointment is either the canopy is the abstine at least that's my opinion

yet abstains yourself first and think about your new line after the birth control you can choose where you feel most comfortable (which you should), ie what is easy for you to use this that does not bother you

An important factor is efficiency. The best is the implant … The pill is less effective. But everything depends on the criteria you care about most. Here are some figures on the effectiveness of each contraception (WHO figures World Health Organization)