1st reason: The program, at least if you can call it that, is openly xenophobic In employment, priority is given to hiring French / e / s, but also the priority of dismissal imposed on immigration / e / s, and the establishment of "a system of taxation of foreign labor" strong deterrent to potential employers. – In terms of solidarity, the allocation of social housing, family allowances and welfare would be exclusively reserved for French / e / s. – In terms of citizenship, the FN wants to suppress the automatic acquisition of French nationality and the right to vote and stand for national / e / s European / ne / s European and local elections. – On immigration, the FN is planning to stop all legal immigration, and therefore to repeal the "family reunion in France" – which directly reach women – the right to limit asylum to "persons only. However, the femmesétrangères, and undocumented immigrants are discriminated against cumulative, both racist and sexist. The measures wanted by the nationalist National Front would therefore even more serious consequences for them that they are women. The second reason: the National Front in power, it is the prohibition for women to have their bodies (Repeal of laws on abortion), women reduced to the role of surrogate mother, children discriminated by parental income. The family preference. It is a pro-natalist policy that consists of two components, a law enforcement aspect and an incentive component. The law enforcement side denies the right of women to control their bodies and choose their life, including: · The repeal of abortion laws: and therefore the challenge to the abortion facility to the minor, the distribution of the morning-after pill in schools, and extended the legal limit for abortion. • The FN also plans to include the right to life, from. • The FN also plans to include the right to life, Desle design in the Constitution. The fetus from conception, will be regarded as a human, which opens the way for very severe penalties against women who abort. · As an alternative to abortion, the FN wants to establish the prenatal adoption, this which will enable all married couples, heterosexual and French, to adopt the unborn child of another woman. Women are reduced to the role of surrogate mothers, and this course without any compensation. The incentive component includes benefits for families say legitimate, and French · Social assistance and family allowances. · The establishment of a "family loan to housing" whose repayment is deferred to each new birth. · The establishment of a pension system favoring the parents of large families. · The introduction of parental income, formerly wage breast, which should enable parents to. · The introduction of parental income, formerly known maternal salary, which should allow parents to seconsacrer full-time education of their children. But given the inequality of wages and the weight of tradition, we know which parent would be a duty to stay at home! Moreover, it is only for women are provided the time arrangements are forced to work a double day of work: domestic and professional. The question is never asked for the men. The willingness to refer women at home is always present in the FN's program. The parental income is a measure that discriminates against children between them. For the FN, the life of the first two children is in effect three years of salary, while the third child's life worth 18. The parental income is clearly something natalist parental income is clearly a measure pushing natalist the birth of her third child, and even a fourth (if births are planned, this income education may be paid. Furthermore, the FN wants to put in place social and tax advantages for what he calls "legitimate home", and thus discriminate against single women, divorced, cohabiting women and lesbians, although they have dependent children. Because children are natural for the FN "a factor of social instability. Http://maisondesfemmes.free.fr/revue/fn/prog.fn.vs.fems.htm Other measures are also provided by the FN to strengthen the family and patriarchal system of male domination over women. These include questioning the laws that simplifies the process of divorce and allowing the separation by mutual consent. The FN obviously does not account for the abuses suffered by women within the couple growing in many cases women to seek divorce. In this same patriarchal perspective, the FN condemned the law reforming the attribution of surnames that allows women to pass their name and the Affiliation Act which allows married women to contest the paternity of the father of their child and to recognize in their own name.. Women and children by the FN, belong to men and must therefore bear their name. To ensure that moral and exclusive binding, the FN is aimed at educating minds by introducing a single thought fueled by a unique culture. The FN recalls in his program in the existence of a "real French culture" than others. There is little doubt that the cultures of immigrant and cultural expressions feminists and lesbians would not certainly not part of this "good" culture and the history of women would not be more development in education standardized as well. In this same spirit of repression, the FN is planning to punish public events, films, commercials and audiovisual broadcasts inciting debauchery. To ensure that moral and exclusive binding, the FN is aimed at educating minds by introducing a single thought fueled by a unique culture. The FN recalls in his program in the existence of a. The FN recalls in his program in the existence of a "real French culture" than others. There is little doubt that the cultures of immigrant and cultural expressions feminists and lesbians would not certainly not part of this "good" culture and the history of women would not be more development in education standardized as well. In this same spirit of repression, the FN is planning to punish public events, films, commercials and audiovisual broadcasts inciting debauchery. The expression of culture and feminist lesbians, our history and our claims as inspirations for freedom and autonomy, could then also be considered as proselytizing or events pornographic incite debauchery, and thus censored and sanctioned name of this principle. Vitriol @: A little reading can not hurt you

It's written in the program or the FN is bullshit?

My god, you're on track to dethrone Aeolus and become (the?) Best (e) anti-racist in my eyes! @ C11 H17 N2 O2 S Na: what are you talking about you?

You can put ourselves PA sources? Because the level of propaganda crap you're not the last either, and then your post is super boring in fact Well if it looks softer than Sharia PA @ You already soliloquy by written as a good schizophrenic, or seeks to deceive you send your sources instead of writing to say nothing until the RM makes me delirious when you even poto Your Jospin himself even admitted that the FN have never been a threat fascist and that this was just a farce, I think that politically it is much over you cock oyster! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xY3jUuFBWIM @ PA are known MCC of the Manege your search shit And then I will not talk .. I t'enc; is different! And your souces ..?

it is unlikely he not mount a France against the other?

f all the hate when I hear the gulag Navy radio I would say it is on the tape Fn

hiring priority given to the French I am not happy at work, because if nothing promotes growth is not clicking fingers which will return! immigrants have nothing to do with the lack of jobs, when are we going to finally understand this? Moreover, our history of France shows!

In short, a program Francophile

Nice work. You know you make me want to campaign for the FN? Lol! I've got to remember they are not racist for me to keep my card. lol Anyways they can thank you for the publicity stunt

MMm you want to contact me? Not too boring worthy of the Harlequin collection or a leaflet SPL, you need more word, learn to do so with a synthesis of sources rather than copy and paste your indigestible

Moral archaic? no no moral at all!

Thank you to summarize the program, I am now convinced to vote for them, there are only good ideas in there.

Very good program, I'll vote for them in 2012

Thank you for this little review, nothing to throw, everything is good. Deeply soon!

It is obvious pk you asking this question?

is a birth of a new arrival: a baby.

Anything! Abortion is seen as a crime only by enlightened, fortunately many of the medical professions are very much in favor of this medical procedure, and does not consider the "crime".

Those who believe this are in fact large illuminated. Qd to those who think like those "doctors" are worse than they are seriously sick.

and miscarriage manslaughter?

this pregnancy it causes no risk to mother and new born to me c 1 crime, "like putting an end to a life of another (the baby) may be (he or she) someone important in society.

I will not debate whether abortion is a crime or not. The only thing I know is that abortion is always an ordeal for the woman who suffered (for whatever reasons). This is a test they will until the end of their days, they have children or not. Sometimes I read on Yahoo that women did this just for trivial reasons, those who advance these theories are people who have never experienced this event.

It's still a living being. and they see this as taking the life of a being. other means of contraception like the pill or condom, are invented to avoid the conception of a child. there are people who spend their time in laboratories doing research, and the goal is to provide the best solutions and means. and not take the life of an unborn baby. even I admit that sometimes it was not much choice. or other moyenque abortion. and must of course be voluntary, because otherwise it is regarded as a crime

according to what doctors? sources, articles supported, thank you @ chopin, nearly 40% of abortions are due to a failure of contraception (condom that broke, pill or IUD failed) plus it is true that the number of abortions n has not declined since the law Veil, about 200 000 per year, however, I invite you to watch the growth of the female population in France since the early 70s and you will see that contrary to what we think the number abortion has declined since the law

Some doctor's con ago beep everywhere

"Under advice of doctors," you're wrong, it's not the doctors who consider it a crime simply for them to terminate a pregnancy, it's not as rewarding as making a heart operation for example . And it pays less too. The only ones who think abortion is a crime are people with ideas rather low ceiling, who think that freedom of the woman is worth nothing, and if ele is pregnant, c 'is his fault, and it aplus assume that, even if it means raising a child unhappy or no father or no family at all … Abortion is a decision not to take lightly, yes it is a living embryo is destroyed, but do not exaggerate, it's not as if we killed a 2 year old child who has learned to develop his intelligence. Abortion right, and rightly so! Fortunately, our mothers and grandmothers have fought for it, thank you to them!

the heart beats of an embryo after 21days for me it was then that the "life" begins not at birth is now known that the links are formed before birth, the baby feels listening and feeling well before the birth! abortion is a crime for me if it's after the 21premiers days but this is my opinion! I will not deal with criminal sincerely hope you and your unborn child that is not screwed up for reasons that you do this! must know that people have an abortion as if doing piercings! it is a shame to have made 2 see 3 abortion is really disgusting! it has you take the pill or anything I know. The child did not suffer. I can be a crank if you like but know that you're not better at least I assume my responsibility and I know what I mean I had a little boy 16 years, I assumed and I find it shameful that a woman of 30 years, does not!

It is still men who save lives, they're heroes who care for sick and when they give advice that is not yours you throw their bananas in the face! They are better placed than you to issue an opinion on the matter, if they say it's a murder there must be a reason. It has made the hunt clinical practice euthanasia, saying that they looked more closely at the dead "soft" does not exist, so do not talk when you are not level, will play with those of your age or your intellectual level instead.

Not all doctors since they are the ones who make them. . .

According to some people, abortion is murder, child. I'm half agree. Yes, it is murder, but it is a murder to crush a microscopic cell, because it is alive. But as the thing has killed no conscience, murders are forgiven. Yet, we kill many animals! So ultimately, I can understand that is against abortion if it is vegetarian, even if I hole it is worse to kill an adult animal with a minimum of consciousness than to kill something which does has not.

@ Chopin: recourse to abortion is sometimes an act far more responsibly than lead, in some cases, a pregnancy to term. A woman aged 30 or over may also have good reasons to use a girl of 15 years. No woman n'avorte by comfort, and even less for pleasure, regardless of age … Also, remember that women who underwent 2, 3 or more abortions are very rare. Most women who have had abortions have done only once during their lives. It is not yours to judge their choices, nor does it belong to us to judge of yours …

For me it's a crime because the first thing that grows in you and a heart that's protecting you avoid his murder.

is not that doctors who believed ca I also say that those who are ca c est criminals except for some who have no choice of course bye

because if want to have children we take head pills precautions Tops … in exceptional cases I understand abortion is better than ill-mannered child but I speak for rape cases rare as it rarely gets pregnant with the pills now women having fun right at the left without worrying about the hop ' Hospital and Embryo to oblivion because ladies want to have fun and do not want to be distorted but they will not think before