How to understand Exodus 21:22,23: "If men fight, they actually encounter a pregnant woman and her children out, but without a fatal accident, it is imperative to impose a compensation according to the owner of the woman will require it, and he will give it through the judges. But if a fatal accident, then you must give soul for soul,

I'm sure God approves of abortion of the child of the devil.

Abortion is possible before 40 days of life of the fetus. Aude 40 days then the soul is breathed into the fetus and abortion is prohibited.

- Religious wars, in the eyes of God, is it legal or is it murder? – When god God asks Abraham (legend I reassure you) to kill his son, is it legal or is it a murder by proxy in the eyes of the applicant (god)? – When God gives Cain kill Abel, is it legal or is it a murder in the eyes of god?

Hi! If it's an accident, an accident and no one is responsible for an accident. But abortion is never an accident, it is a voluntary act (abortion: Abortion). And if it is voluntary, it is murder … – "There will be in your country or one miscarrying or barren. I will fulfill the number of thy days. "(Exodus 23:26). … Because God has commanded! Amen.

Bonsoir Fatal accident is said twice in these two verses. abortion, crime Oh how consent can not be an accident, a crime of murder clearly intended and desired, the mother wanted for X reason (sometimes called by the parent) do not bother to give life without giving up sex. sexual intercourse was made and intended by the Lord God between a man and a woman consecrated by God (who is the inventor of marriage, Genesis 2:24 Ephesians 5:31) 8:13 p.m. Do not murder. is a commandment of God's law Jacques 2 2:10 For whoever keeps the whole law and yet stumbles against one, he is guilty of all. 2:11 For he who said, Thou shalt not commit adultery, said also, Thou shalt not kill. But if you do not commit adultery but do commit murder, you have become a transgressor of the law. crime is to kill a living being with the desire to intentionally kill him. even babies are considered viable because it would have no abortion. babies are considered viable as well, for without abortion auraientnormalement he lived. This takes us back a little massacre of the innocents Herod decreed that the demon to kill the newborn Christ, fortunately without success. The accident is rather seen in the case of an unwanted abortion by the mother

What is abortion? Abortion is the expulsion of an embryo or a fetus, under normal conditions, is not viable outside the womb Jehovah He sees an embryo as a human being? "For you knit me (…) you in the womb .(…) Your eyes saw my embryo, and were written in your book all its parts, in terms of days when they were trained and where there was not one of them. " (Psaumes139 :13-16) He who Jehovah is the origin of life (Acts 17:28), the life of a child in the early stages of its development, just after the design has a very large value, so a pregnant woman who was knocked should be compensated and if there was death of the fetus so it was the Mosaic law which came into effect "soul to soul" (Deuteronomy 19:21), a life been removed, another life had to compensate the loss put an end voluntarily (no miscarriage or accident) in the life of a fetus. '(Psaumes139 :13-16) He who Jehovah is the source of human life (Acts 17:28), the life of a child in the early stages of its development, just after the design has a great value, so a pregnant woman who was knocked should be compensated and if there were fetal death so it was the Mosaic law which came into effect "soul to soul" (Deuteronomy 19:21), a life was taken away, another life had to compensate the loss Ending voluntarily (no miscarriage or accident) to the life of a fœtusest considered by the God of the Bible as a murder ..

Tradition holds us when you are!

Strange … because very contradictory, but indeed I think it is well established traditions in the brains of very exclusive …

Because these people have no sense. Dictate what the idiots want, they want

But is it not equally contradictory to be for abortion and against the death penalty? That is to say, taking the life of an innocent and let it saves a rot. They therefore have no logic, it is the diktat of morons and very closed from what I read above.

Me, no. I am against abortion, and especially against the death penalty.

The reverse is equally troubling and the much more common, most who are against the death penalty for abortion is not a paradox we kill those who are weak, words, fetuses, etc., a human power

You seem to do a lot of fillings in your questions. Other form of prejudice? But a different style Islamists.

not at all certain I am for the death penalty and abortion and am not the only

"Cons" "to" to do a case by case

Is not women decide? or rather, each woman? By what right a man can decide his ban? as rightists in the 70s? Is not that disgusting?

Whatever the opinions of others.

You still have to explain to young women that abortion is NOT a contraceptive. Abortion is a traumatic operation and should be practiced only as a last resort and especially without delay.

This is obviously not up to him. But see the case he dreams of being a father … but yes it does exist, it will try to persuade his girlfriend, we understand that. Once I do an abortion or abortion was a crime we were talking about abortionist … this time not so long ago and people still consider it a crime and would like to impose their beliefs on others .. Besides few services do hospitals and many are going abroad.

Precisely because they are men ………. And machismo still reigns almost by atavism! So it is for or against the woman who is master of his stomach and should remain in any case a man must decide for us! and those who are backward and cons are suffering from acute obscurantism! PS not that right-wingers of the 70s sorry! The MLF had its militant leftists v bcp as we say today "! PS2 and I'll remember it the right to vote that made the abortion law to free Ms. Veil and Giscard who tremendously supported! "I like that does not distort the facts or history

I think that man should not impose its decision. But the woman either. If the "father" wants to keep the child, is his right, and I find it disgusting on the part of the girl have an abortion anyway. Conversely, if the "mother" wants to keep her unborn child is just as disgusting on the part of man to force her to abort. It must be a mutual decision. Aty, be less aggressive, you might think you want to exclude men of any decision "because they are just men." Is ambiguous, be careful. Moreover, whether or not your point of view, we must consult the man and woman in this kind of decision. Now, ethically speaking, it is also a right. A man would not have the right to condemn this practice, but if a woman? If this man is disgusted by abortion, it is his opinion, point bar. Same thing for a woman. As is their right to believe in God or not. After, we must know the difference between defending his point of view, and impose his point of view …

really?? they do have the right to have an opinion on the pretext that they are men?? and can be put aside a certain Mary there is a little more than 2010 years to a woman is pregnant must be a man.

it is for the woman should return the decision to abort or not, anyway, the desire for children that are living in two. but ultimately that is the body of the woman and her child that it 's act. that is difficult enough in this question if we add more moral judgments that is hell.

it seems that it fe o bobo baby and mom … : (

I do not think it's hurting the baby but the mother has no doubts in his head. I do not judge girls who have abortions but only once because after becoming a habit and you'd say "Protect yourself c ***». It takes courage to raise a child but he must also take the decision to abort.

it does not hurt the baby because there is no baby, just one embryo. For the mother, yes it hurts physically. (Psychologically, I would not allow myself in Assen a general truth, while I do not know how it would be correct.). Now what I think: that the birth control in this way has always existed and that fortunately today is supported by medical teams to prevent a slaughter.

Stephanie @ => in France can abort up to 3 months and in some countries up to 6. So look fetal development and thoughtful. Me, I think that 1) you should make efforts in French 2) you ask a very controversial 3) there is a law that can prevent human catastrophes 4) it is not for me but it is essential it exists

I'm for abortion but when it rapes etc. otherwise I find it outrageous to do so regularly ….

Yes there must be aborted. Rape real accidents disease. The problem I see almost every time it is women who do not take precautions and abort! It disgusts me the most developed. Some have abortions several times! They should do the out of pocket! I say and repeat abortion is not a method of contraception. There is too much abuse!

http://www.imanway.com/fr/showthread.php?509-L% 26% 238217% 3Bavortement-in-Islam

… for abortion are against the death penalty? Finally, it is nocturnal, right? @ Minouchette: My heart missed a beat … He iced the idea of misfortune happen to my monsters!

Che I'm not for abortion and the death penalty:))

not necessarily .. I'm for abortion up to a limit of days and specific for the death penalty for repeat offenders perverse.

c the death penalty actually catch up the abortion c fé not wanted in ten. propremendis abortion is to repair lerreur not take a condom. fuck a kid o world to fuck her life lair c'estpas sentence. Cdn you see very young girl lay not in conscience Momes c and c are often the students who ur bb unwanted.

Ben er …. I'm for abortion … and cons of the death penalty … I'm part yet … people (good) … also;))) @ Uh … I realize … javais that misread the question … again ((((

Missed, there are many views but those who are against abortion are the same people who would bless the guns to kill more humans can perhaps they are afraid that, with the abortion they have less meat gun to be able to laugh the bastards? And those who are pedophiles, as they do not bandage with a dead fetus they want a kid living

I think we should be facing such a situation to afford to say for or against. Ex: your 15 year old daughter tell thee she is pregnant, what do you do? Keep BB and spoil the life or help him do his IGV and gain tps grow … Ex: you kidnap your child is raped and then killed, how you want the person who hurt your flesh? I do not give my opinion but your question is interesting! Bizzz Acrobat

It is a matter of religion my friend … there are religions that prohibit abortion (the right to life of human beings) and authorize the death penalty (law society)! ! !

In the case of abortion, it's you who decides between you and yourself. In the case of the death penalty is society that decides. Those who are for the death penalty and against abortion are the paramount interest of the group over that of the individual.

Abortion limited, and the death penalty, needed to calm down!

Unbearable images, meant to illustrate the different techniques of abortion of fetuses showing, sometimes disjointed, that's what the second high school students accepted to repeat, in Manosque, were forced to look at a civics Legal and social. "Me, I left the room, with two of my comrades, but the others stayed until the end, stunned," said Maxime, a student in the class. "It was not the first year that this professor of history and geography that put pro-life film program continues, and I had agreed in advance with my parents to leave if he ever began again, "says the teenager. The incident occurred in mid-October and revealed by La Provence on Wednesday, was immediately reported to the Academy of Alpes-de-Haute-Provence by the head of the institution, and by a letter from parents. The local authority in the Federation of Parent (CIPF), Annie Mouthier, also intervened. A survey. A enquêteadministrative has been initiated, leading to a Nov. 8 inspection teacher, experienced teacher, aged about forty years. Meanwhile, a helpline and dialogue has been established in the institution http://espanol.video.yahoo.com/watch/2910486/8340073

Unbearable images? No more than some films or videos that kids watch on the net!

ohhh awful, so I'm against it, except when necessary, but good bugs, I'll still get burned by the racist gang nickname! those who have not watched the images are unacceptable The video lasts about 5 minutes, I mm not see a minute of the video …

Cons of course! @ I do not open the video, I'm a sensitive soul lol

Thank you for this video. You just do the same thing this professor contacting us. There are 14-years on QR. So one to two years younger than his class. So, knowing your beautiful mind, I see this teacher as a courageous and intelligent man. A man of principle who took the risk of going against the current official thinking and that could pay dearly. It is true that this may offend the soul of a teenager, but at their age, the question of abortion may arise. It's good to know. If they are too sensitive to see the reality facing two years of manhood, is that our education prepares them difficult to grasp the reality head on. And then what, you've seen Alien? The Exorcist? It's worse. And they love it. Suffice to say things clearly, abortion is murder of innocent inconvenient. Not a technique of contraception. @ Little Pixie: that this is not propaganda but the truth. Personally, this is the propaganda of pro-abortion killers that I find offensive.

yeah, in France it is 200,000 deaths per year with that, but nobody talks about. and then we'll tell you that the country is aging naturally, they kill their kids! Thank you, Ms. Weill.

When Planned Parenthood comes to pro-abortion propaganda no problem, but when it shows the reality of abortion, everybody plays the virgins. Kudos to this teacher

I do not know … it reminds me that abortion is not a trivial matter.

It's less cruel to watch a war movie than to make, right? I have not watched yet (sensitive soul) do not need to dissuade me.

Except that until proven otherwise, that is for or against abortion is a right. I'm not saying it should be used as a means of contraception, but the woman still has the right to dispose of her body as she sees fit … This video is so pro-life propaganda liberties. Disseminating this kind of video for high school students was therefore not appropriate. One can be against abortion, but we let people make their own choices and make their own decisions.

yes

It's great no matter what this video is pure disinformation. Nothing to do with abortion. (Aspiration) I hope this teacher will be severely punished.

Hmm …. Regardless of whether one is against abortion or pro-choice (I say with "to" because nobody is really "for" abortion), the least we can do for this teacher clearly invested with feeling a mission of information and prevention, in itself allow me not to criticize, would have been to avoid showing his class videos lying … because, what I see in this video? fetuses allegedly from abortion, but it is easy to see that these malformed fetuses (and already well developed), apparently died of natural in utero (fetal miscarriage from nearby the term) or premature babies stillborn … in all cases no embryos younger than 12 weeks. It does make it less painful and dramatic abortion? No, surely not. But at least if there must be information, whether disseminated in an objective, concrete, realistic and non-deceptive. Here, the only purpose is clearly to shock and. Here, the only purpose is clearly to shock and not feel guilty. Far be it from me to remove the pro-life, but I think the arguments they use to deter potential "candidates" to abortion are not the good.

it is neither more nor less than crap, an offense and psychological violence exerted on the person of minors 15 years as part of their school activity I guess the teacher was in her own right when He accomplished this feat of terrorizing her students by spreading this video emphatic and misleading because, although the problem is not there, it is obvious that fetuses exhibited are the result of therapeutic abortion and that their morphology is not to do with that of fetuses of 8 to 10 weeks (the average time in which the acts of orthogenics are made in France) so this is propaganda (I assume also that it has reserved, Like others, the right to cut the card most of his argument by claiming that they had made it clear images of the Holocaust educational purposes, that is what I have already had occasion to read this) except that here it comes comply minds against Republican legislation which grants women the right to dispose of oneself and one is in theline of a dogma that denies him and who opposes the same way we would not accept a teacher to hold a public teaching hour on the harms of eating pork, or the indecency to show her hair when one is female and not necessarily advocating the niqab and the burqa in the name of public morals or self respect: it's the same thing and worse it could have spread under the same intentions, images that show the devastation caused monstrous before 1975 by clandestine abortions performed on women who could not afford to use a foreign doctor, but that is not the issue .. c ' is simply outrageous

One hundred million. This is the approximate number of abortions performed in the West, including Russia, since the legalization of abortion – legalization occurred in most of our old country during the 70s. It is ten times the number of victims of Nazi concentration camp system, double the number of fatalities during the Second World War, roughly the number of victims of Communism and Soviet Russia, Maoist China combined. In terms of demographic, so it's a catastrophe without precedent. And, incredible, it was done mostly in silence. not a whisper, almost. The woman is a machine, killing far more efficient than man for good reason: by refusing to give life, it takes away. Drac Michel who spoke to solve the sub Emigration by birth?

Because the world is overpopulated, it should rather extend abortion to women in poor countries, particularly African countries and the Middle East. Otherwise, there will always be an immigration problem, even if Western women no longer have an abortion. The majority of immigrants do not come because we need them, but because they seek a better life.

Shuuut you'll get you the lightning feminists nIMPORTANT … koi …

wrong for your addition, in France as an indication, the end of the baby boom started before the Veil law and there was a marked increase in births after 1976, then fell after the early 80s to stabilize its variables are related to other socioeconomic factors that may correlate precisely either the decriminalization of abortion or immigration (see German example: the same rate of immigration, birth rates plummeted to 1.3 per woman ) is the changing status of women in society and access to contraception that can be held responsible for the relative decline in the number of births, not abortions did not affect fertility of women, abortion is once, twice, we had two children later in terms of fertility, abortion is "neutral" to see the difficulties we meet to try to knock out the gullible with statements to sweeping the woman http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discussion:Interruption_volontaire_de_grossesse/archive1.org / wiki / Discussion: Interruption_volontaire_de_grossesse/archive1 the femmen'ôte not life, it gives different for the rest, it is a political debate and civilization where religious beliefs on women's right to have of itself have been resolved (ie removed) with the accession of interest (s) it is no longer the place of preaching fundamentalist Catholic-Muslim

They are seriously encouraged by our leaders. The child is too much for them. It is not immediately profitable. Crime of crimes in our society capitalist-globalist. So much so that our media pays to the bare paedo!

the woman carries the grain. the man who must satisfy his sexual needs should easily be done with a woman not? unless he does it with animals, so do not blame the women! thinking that they must keep the package and manage it. the fault lies with torque too irresponsible to use the science that has done everything to serve the couple to avoid catastrophe. recess so we must have recourse to an immoral decision I and disturbs the conscience of the woman. to all men irresponsible!! start to watch another woman companion if you can not take your responsibilities. the misery on earth is your fault.

- "O heavens, drop by drop from above, and the cloudy skies drip justice. Let the earth open, and be fruitful hello, and be implanted in the same time justice. I, Jehovah, I HAVE CREATED IT. "(Isaiah 45:8 – TMN). It is God who is undoubtedly the CREATOR OF ALL THINGS AND ALL LIFE … -" Furthermore, my own hand laid the foundations of the earth, and MY OWN RIGHT has stretched out the heavens. I call them so they stand there together. "(Isaiah 48:13 – TMN). We are REALLY aware that God created everything and there is no doubt. "… I, Jehovah, I HAVE CREATED THIS …" and ".. MY OWN HAND laid the foundations of the earth, and MY OWN RIGHT stretched out the heavens …" are compelling evidence that God is the author of creation. But then why the author of the Epistle to the Hebrews ascribes creation to Jesus Christ? – "Thou hast loved righteousness, and you hated lawlessness. Therefore God, thy God, hath anointed thee with [the] oil of gladness more than your. Therefore God, your God, has anointed you with [the] oil of gladness more than tesassociés. And: "You, at the beginning, O Lord, YOU HAVE INSTALLED THE FOUNDATIONS OF THE EARTH AND THE HEAVENS ARE [TO] WORKS OF YOUR HANDS. "(Hebrews 1: 9, 10 – TMN). Who is the savior announced? Is it not God? – "Tell those who are troubled heart:" Be strong. Do not be afraid. Look! YOUR GOD WILL COME WITH THE VENGEANCE, yes God, with compensation. HIMSELF WILL COME AND SAVE YOU. "(Isaiah 35: 4 – TMN). -" You are my witnesses, "this is what Jehovah says," yes my servant whom I chose, so that you know me and have faith in me, and that You understand that I am the Same. There was no God formed before me and after me there has always been no. Me, I am Jehovah, AND OUT OF ME, THERE IS NO SAVIOR. "(Isaiah 43: 10, 11 – TMN). … And the Saviour, who came as advertised, was it not Jesus Christ? -" … And they said to the woman: "It ' is more because of what you told us believe, because we have heard for ourselves and we know that this [man] is. And they said to the woman: "It's not because of what you told us believe, because we have heard for ourselves and we know that this [man] estvraiment THE SAVIOR OF THE WORLD." (John 4: 42 – TMN) Given that John the Baptist was he smooth the way? Is not God? – "Listen! Someone crying in the wilderness "made way for Jehovah. Through the desert plain, MEETING THE RIGHT ROAD FOR OUR GOD. "(Isaiah 40:3 – TMN). And before that he paved the way? Is it not to Jesus Christ? – "He said:" I am [the] voice of one crying in the wilderness "RENDEZ RIGHT WAY OF JEHOVAH", as said the prophet Isaiah . "(John 1: 323 – TMN) Who is the shepherd who has promised to gather his lambs? Is not Jehovah? – "Look! The Sovereign Lord Jehovah HIMSELF WILL COME AS A STRONG, and his arm shall rule for him. Look! His reward is with him, and the wages he pays is before him. LIKE A SHEPHERD HE WILL shepherd his flock. For its IT arm gathers the lambs, and on her breast he [the] will. It will lead [gently] lactating. "(Isaiah 40: 10, 11 – TMN). And who gathered the sheep?. And who gathered the sheep? Is not Jesus Christ? – "I'm The GOOD SHEPHERD; excellent shepherd gives his soul for the sheep." (John 10: 11 – TMN) is Jehovah before every knee should bow and every tongue confess … – "I HAVE JURY BY MYSELF – from my own mouth came out to speak with justice, so it will not return – ALL THAT TO ME bend KNEE, ANY LANGUAGE swear ,…» (Isaiah 45: 23 – TMN). … but before whom every knee should bow and every tongue should confess? – "… THAN THE NAME OF JESUS TO ALL FOLDED KNEE those who are in heaven and those on earth and those under the ground, AND THAT ANY LANGUAGE overt recognition that Jesus Christ is Lord to the glory of God the Father. "(Philippians 2: 10 11 – TMN). Zechariah foretold that Jehovah would be sold THIRTY PIECES OF SILVER … – "So I told them:" If it's good for your eyes, give [me] my salary, otherwise, do not you. "They paid my salary while: THIRTY PIECES OF SILVER. JEHOVAH ME BUT SAYING: "Throw the treasure – EC. BUT JEHOVAH ME SAYING: "Throw the treasure – BEAUTIFUL WHICH HAVE BEEN CEPRIX ESTIMATED BY THEM. "I took the thirty pieces of silver and threw it to the treasury in the house of Jehovah. "(Zechariah 11: 12, 13 – TMN). Is it not Jesus who was sold THIRTY PIECES OF MONEY -" Then one of twelve, the one called Judas Iscariot, went to the priests head and said: "What will you give me so I can book? "They had appointed him THIRTY PIECES OF SILVER. (Matthew 26:14, 15 – TMN). Thank you for your responses by relying on the Bible …

thank you for reading but your text is too short, you have no other longer to give more precision? good luck for readers

Hello Yes, God IS unique and Jesus Christ as God IS, TJ asked them to also tell how Christ is the archangel Michael, one might almost say three people still there.

is fun in my library, I have at least 50 books lately that clearly demonstrate that the written "sacred" would rather take the fun on claims about god, jesus, creation, and everything else

I always wondered if a pregnant person who expects triplets and that one child may want to derail the other two.

I do not think it possible and I am wondering that pregnant women could think like that already has such a thing and how can t be decided to stop life has this or another rather than a baby, I this question is a bit like bizard.

O_O

It is possible to do, it's called an embryo reduction (it happens for example during IVF if 3 or 4 embryos were implanted and all continue their evolution), but in general it leaves two embryos, pregnancies with twins a relatively low risk (compared to triplets, quads, etc.).

Good question. Should go and ask the question to Google cons:)

If they put the life of the mother in danger.

the choice is difficult to sacrifice two —- the carrier is in principle a mom!

While abortion is a law in France but France is a country where one has the freedom to think and this right is unfortunately overused. I am AGAINST the abortion and what do you care? that people think it is a crime and believe that the embryo is a full life, then I want to clarify that four months is no longer an embryo, some countries allow the same to 5 months "When I was at school I saw girls unconscious and weak about an abortion as if they were going to remove a single mole, without realizing that they had life in them … ABOUT I would like us to believe, as some people from other cultures may be offended by this practice. Regarding IMG … if life is in danger … is tricky. @ Mina simply decide that when someone publicly on this subject, immediately everyone is shocked! I would not prevent a girl from having an abortion, but he did that tonight fautpas took as an act. @ Mina simply decide that when someone publicly on this subject right now everyone is shocked! I would not prevent a girl from having an abortion, but he did that tonight fautpas took a acteanodin she must bear it all for me is a crime. Lyam @ the right of Abortion is too used a three pregnancies is huge! @ Lyam the right to kill

They just pretend to be a FASHION! It's great how … Intello Sunday revolutionary salon etc. … Hits their specialty is to take in appearance, because in substance they are empty and they hide themselves with an empty mask

It true that di forbid you give your opinion and your question does not exist @ calimero. It keeps you di express yourself, it too z'injuste.

And as you are for or against abortion, what is the problem? I not really understand but you're right to give your opinion in France because all too often that you can not give it to do displeasing. Abortion is a personal choice, no one can compel a woman to bear a child and nobody can force him to keep him against his will, obviously within the limits set by law. With that, good day

You study the history of abortion in school, right? We tell you the time or it was not legal, rich women would have abortions abroad, and the poor abortion were made with knitting needles … With the result of many deaths (due to haemorrhage, infection …). What you're not for abortion, it is your right. You do not get yourself an abortion, that's all. But every woman has her body. On abortion, the fetus is not life in itself, is a schematic life. And for IMG, if they tell you that your child will be severely disabled, you'll change may be of notice. Regarding "little girls" who have abortions. The problem is the lack of prevention (on contraception [condoms, pills ...]). Abortion is not a simple thing, and should certainly not be seen as a contraceptive.

The worry is not to be against abortion, the concern is that generally people in your case trying to blame, to judge women who have abortions. Whether you bristle cons, this is your problem, but in this case, also let people who are doing what they want.

You have the right to be AGAINST abortion but you have no right to IMPOSE your vision of things that you do not, and hast never will but it is something to want to ban the abortion c is something else. because there you encroach on the freedom of others nothing gives you the right to judge others I do not think that women who have abortions do so with great pleasure I think it must be hard and if they are c 'that there' is a REASON you koi prefer his women to keep the embryo, so they do not have enough resources to meet these needs for the "give" to the adoptive parents, you want her Women keep the embryo, although they were raped … you say that France is a country where one has the freedom to think and this right is "unfortunately" too THEREFORE used should not be "TOO" leave us the freedom to think? "the right to abortion is overused a three pregnancies is huge!" and then that's freedom let others live as if it is. You say that France is another country where we have the freedom to think and this right is "unfortunately" too THEREFORE used should not be "TOO" leave us the freedom to think? "The right to abortion too used a three pregnancies is huge! "and then that's freedom let others live as if c'estqu'il is a reason." the right to kill "is not yet a human being is not dsl pr nothing but the limit is 3 months

I think that this idea was taken over by fundamentalists of any religion. So when you are against abortion in our society, it seems we tried as fundamentalist in the minds of people that go together. So you're absolutely right, and everyone is entitled to his opinion, without however, be "cataloged" labeled. To me abortion is also a crime. I'm always very gaffe not find myself in a position of having an abortion, whatever the reason, because I know that psychologically I could not stand, it would pursue me all my life and I might make a depression. .. bottomless. Thank you for expressing your opinion loud and clear

ouch ouch remove a mole that has to hurt.

The reversal of values 50 years ago was a crime and is now the epitome of the modern mind. People want to see or hear.

God bless your words, it is a horrible murder http://www.stmichelarchange.org/rubrique 0.1-1-open-letter-to-Christian, 465263.html there is a video on abortion, WARNING, pictures hard, you are sensitive souls prevented what shocks me is the 43 million abortions worldwide in 2003 (wikipedia) imagined when (doctors) will appear before God, even Hitler would pass for a saint, for Hitler 's killed no one but himself and his wife. but the doctor with his nickname 40,000 crimes of his hands?

I am against abortion! My five children all died and so I wanted to have at least one in vie.Malheureusement I have no right to remain pregnant and I take all précautions.Pendant me my heart is cracked, there are Women who have abortions, which kill their child in the embryo ventre.Un that's life. NOTE: Medical abortion is another thing I have no anger in me against these women, just punishment, because we live in a society where there are several ways to not stay enceinte.Plutôt not get pregnant that abortion. Good day and fewer abortions and thank you for your question

Ah, but the right to kill us have. That is certain, no need to talk about abortion for this. There are even people who think killing is the "justice" or that killing is "normal" when it receives an order. It sometimes work for "good." We live in a society of legitimate violence, we must not forget. It's nice to talk about the right to "life" when judging others. But it would be even better if it did not destroy that life in an electric chair, if you do not massacred at the hands, if we do not mutilated by "tradition" if you do not shut up in cages, if you do not annihilated on the battlefield, and if allowed to go in peace without strive when it comes to his term. Let the women decide which is best. If you're against abortion, which will force you to abort? Nobody. You dream frankly, you imagine being a martyr is lynched for his beliefs? Nope, sorry to break your fantasy glory.

ah, but we have the right to be cons! what was not allowed to do is to threaten doctors who practice or women who use them.

in some cases, rape, neglect of contraception sometimes it happens because the guard could be arriving at a birth where the child is not well supported or is not desired is not good. .. ok softer target abortion can sometimes be a solution for when the pregnancy is unwanted or you can not take care of the child. but the problem is not that abortion figures, there are too many! agree that to happen but there is a great lack of prevention. it becomes commonplace that it is wrong … a little girl summed up very well: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=93FjRPQGMdQ&feature=PlayList&p=35A2361030FAD698&playnext_from=PL&playnext=1&index=4

This act also spiritual consequences. One way to heal and repair, is first to assign a name to the child removed, to say Mass for him, requested by the mother, and know that this child is in the Father's love. It is part of the history of the mother, even if he does not live among his family in a concrete manner. This should be an invitation to understand that even if we think that our bodies belong to us, we received a free call to life and (sometimes too) to love our parents who have dared to welcome us as a gift of life. (although we may think sometimes that we are "not a gift "… for them at the character)." Making love "should be a noble deed and responsible and not the mere gratification of uncontrolled impulse, or inclination to do as the girls experts in the field, to not pass for a belated …! is an act that involves life.

It's not "fashion" to be against abortion, it is extremist, heartless, intolerant and stupid. The only thing is that given how anti-abortion are treated, there is where wonder if intolerance is not where did not think so! Abortion is a bad solution that was given was a problem. I find it shameful that today, in our society, full of various contraceptives, there are so many abortions. It has become so commonplace, so it is not at all. It just has to see the number of associates who create to help people who have had abortions and who is destroyed. It also forgets the men, and yes, sometimes the father does not want the woman aborts, but he has no right decision, while certainly not his body that bears the child, but it ' is still child alongside his mother. In short, this subject is very complex, because for many there are of "good excuses" I'm too young is not the time, I'm too old, I want no child. In short, this subject is very complex, because for many there are of "good excuses" I'm too young is not the time, I'm too old, I am not a child, I have no money, I'm going to throw everybody and being alone … etc. etc. Of course, I understand all these reasons, but for me they are not admissible against the act of removing a living and from living his life. "Freedom of the woman over her body"? And freedom of the child to have his body? Where is it? Abortion is in no way a freedom is a prison in which many women shut themselves and suffer all their lives.

Long before to be a story of God, a pregnancy due to rape is unmanageable for a mère.Il are other ways to have an abortion than surgical way, so far benefit from the knowledge acquired only during a rape proved.

I'm for abortion rights. If people come the claws as soon as someone says he is against abortion, often comes from the fact that the pro-life, or at least what I see most often, are terribly intolerant. For pro-choice, there is an overflow, and thus necessarily no longer tolerate the slightest hint of a restriction of abortion rights. Many pro-life, in fact, want to completely ban this right and the pro-choice are seen and treated as monsters, murderers, and this is a very serious charge that I find deplorable (it is also a meanness …., because the subject is extremely complex) . Me, I do not agree! It is up to each woman to choose what is best for her. In response to Mina, you say you will not prevent a girl from having an abortion. It means being tolerant. Unfortunately, all pro-lifers are not like you and are not prepared to respect everyone's choice (that's terrible what I see in the U.S.).. And this is shocking! And what shocks me even more is that it gives the fault solely on the woman and that annoys me greatly! The two to tango, make a child too. Men and women must be responsible! The point that I agree with you, is that abortion is now seen by some young girls (and boys) as a means of contraception. However, banning abortion will not change numbers, women will get abortions elsewhere or in deplorable conditions that put their lives at risk. The answer to the number of abortions is not to prohibit the practice, but to educate young people. Not only girls but also boys who have only a vague idea of female contraception. We need to teach girls AND boys what contraception, how to use it, without taboos and as you say, abortion is not an arbitrary act. However, the school and parents are not doing their job of that. It should also be a refund of. It should also be recoverable desmoyens contraception (at least in part) because they are far from free contrary to what some might expect. With regard to the IMG, I do not see how delicate it is. Even if the mother's life is in danger, she should not abort? And leave a widower, and other children motherless? A family destroyed? It must abort if she wishes, even in cases of serious genetic diseases. Everyone is not ready psychologically and / or financially to accommodate a disabled child. And the number of structures to accommodate these children (I speak to schools and aid to development) in France are virtually nonexistent. It is the obstacle course. Everyone does not have the resources.

A true believer, whatever his religion, can not condone abortion. It is a crime in the fullest sense of the term.