It's irritating all those who say "it was not right, it is a living being" etc etc.. every woman is free to choose whether it wants to abort or not! it is better that the "child" is not born that if after his mother will regret her whole life to have had him. You remember that you feel in your mother's womb? no? Ben and me neither .. must therefore stop believing that "the poor baby very badly"

We have the right to be against abortion.

It is mostly men who sing.

and if the woman is in danger of death doing what we

it's still a living being that cold cuts

Hello! In your eyes, perhaps, but in the eyes of God, YES, it is a crime! – "THERE WILL BE IN YOUR COUNTRY OR miscarrying or barren. I will fulfill the number of thy days. "(Exodus 23:26). It is an order that God gave …! – "Woe to those who call evil good and good evil ,…» (Isaiah 5:20). Amen.

ok but do not act it becomes a commonplace means to replace or contraception. it remains above all an act on a psychologically painful for the woman who is forced to abortion.

One thing that we should not forget is that when a woman aborts, which should have been a baby is an embryo. It therefore has no feelings. In my opinion, abortion is not a crime, because when a woman takes such a decision is that it has already weighed the pros and cons, and she has concluded that it will be better for herself and the child. The crime had been born to this child knowing that he would not know the happiness and fulfillment he might have had if it was expected … After there are tons of reasons for a woman to abort, health, family environment, etc.. But remember one thing that a woman miscarried never for pleasure.

But it's not even a baby is a fetus. In any case there are laws for that. Abortion is legal in France until a certain stage of pregnancy. So, arrears of style: "God said … gnia gnia gni, gnia gnia gnia" they should put them back in their place. They take care of their business and their favorite book and they let the cluster to those who do nothing to shake!

1) The big con … those who consider it a heap cell is a human being! You see, they are so stupid, that soon he will say not eat this cake, or you will kill your future small, small, small, small, small, small, little, little girl because of diabetes! Anyway. Abortion is of course not a crime! 2) The big con … that those who consider it preferable to keep the child after a rape or an error of contraception / envy! Anyway. Abortion is of course not a crime! 3) The big con … that those who consider it a crime not to be born a human who does not yet exist (physically, psychologically, economically, politically, historically, socially, etc.)! Anyway. Abortion is of course not a crime! 4) The big con … that those who prefer to live an unwanted child than to avoid this design, which according to the logic of believing, send directly to paradise … Anyway. Abortion is of course, not a. Abortion is of course not uncrime! 5) The big con … that those who did not understand that if everyone thought like them, humanity would disappear in less than 3 generations! (Crowding-> lack of resources-> battle: to survive -> destruction of humanity) Anyway. Abortion is of course not a crime! Finally, large rec have these religious extremists! Haaaa, religion and such wonders … we say more, except: "releases". I reassure you: Abortion is not a crime! And those who think otherwise are idiots.

No, the woman who goes through this is not the choice for many reasons, now what should we do, abort or give birth? I disagree totally abandoned, my answer is clear.

No. Cons by forcing girls to perform illegal abortions or to visit the "abortionist," it is criminal.

NO, normally are the fundamentalists of all stripes who develop this idea, who do not know what they mean, abortion is a business woman, not hysterical fundamentalists, those they are unable to know what suffering of a woman who is in the position to make that choice. A lot of respect for their suffering, this is NOT a fun, but sometimes life has forced them to come là.Oui woman is free, but it does not use this freedom, for pleasure, and the man in all this?

Job does not curse it not the day of his birth ?…. The Bible calls it al t abortion? Before anyone jujer on abortion may be the same ones who are against WELCOME their children when they are used as cannon fodder in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Ivory Coast! Legitimize the abortion wars! Legitimize the devil in him!

Is not it? Only visible minorities are taken into account! You probably remember all the days of your life since you left your mother's womb …

Exodus 20:13 Thou shalt not kill. Deuteronomy 5:17 Thou shalt not kill. Jacques 2:11 For he who said, Thou shalt not commit adultery, said also, Thou shalt not kill. But if you do not commit adultery but do commit murder, you become a lawbreaker. definition of the word "murder": Assen death to someone else voluntarily and consciously to do so. 5 Isaiah 5:20 Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter! 5:21 Woe to those who are wise in their eyes, and who believe themselves smarter! 5:22 Woe to those who the heroes at drinking wine And valiant men in mixing strong drink; 5:23 who acquit the guilty for a bribe, and deprive the innocent of their rights! 5:24 Therefore, as a tongue of fire devours stubble, And as the flames consumed the dry grass, So their root shall be as rottenness, and their flower

With all means of contraception on the market that becomes pregnant unintentionally is a fool and that is what I would like abortion. Today it aborts as we change shirt, this right that women have fought with a capital F, is violated by the consumer society, we should prohibit certain abortions of convenience just to punish these mindless.

That's what I think: Diary of a girl who never saw the day Oct. 5: My life started today. My parents did not know it yet, but I'm already there. And I'm a girl. I have blonde hair and blue eyes. All my heritage is already fixed, even my fondness for flowers. Oct. 19: Some say I'm not yet be true that only my mother exists. But I am a real person, just a small crumb of bread is no less bread. My mother there is one thing, but I also exist. October 23: My mouth is now beginning to open. Consider that in a year I start laughing and then a little later I will. I know that my first word will be: "MOM!" October 25: Today my heart started to beat himself. Now he will fight for my whole life without ever stopping. After several years, he will eventually get tired. When it stops, I die. November 2: I grew up a daily. November 2: I grow daily more unpeu. My arms and legs begin to take shape. But it will take time before my mom a hug without stooping, and I get to hold a bouquet of flowers and candy kiss. November 12: The tiny fingers are beginning to appear on my hands. Because they are small! Later, I can cuddle with mom's hair. November 20: It is only today that the doctor told Mom I was there in his heart. As it should be! Are you happy, say, Mom? November 25: Mom and Dad must surely get me a name. They do not yet know that I am a girl. Me, I'd call me Catherine. I'm already starting to be large. December 10: My hair grows. They are thin, soft and shiny. I wonder what color are those of the mother. December 13: That's it, I began to see. Everything is dark around me. When mom put me in the world, there will be sunshine and flowers. But what I liked most is to see. But what pleased me the most is voirmaman. Say, Mom, how are you? December 24: I wonder if mom hears the weak beats of my heart. Some children come into the world with disabilities. As for me, my heart is strong and healthy. He regularly beat: boom-pa, boom-pa. Mom, you have a little girl in excellent health! December 28: Today my mother killed me.

Abortion is a choice, not an "obligation". An accident can happen: missed pill, vomited, top creaking, IUD's hot … Few abortions used as birth control. Sometimes it is man who blackmailed to abortion, or that bar altogether, sometimes leaving a woman in such a precarious situation as it is the "best" solution … @ Hideyatsu: your stupidity is matched only by your ignorance and your grudge … the number of abortions is relatively stable since 1975, when the population was 52 million in 1975 and 63 million in 2006 (at the limit, one could almost say that statistically speaking, it is down). your mind must be very poor and cramped to reason and … pray that your method of contraception never betray you

Rot copied text of "Nino" is a disgrace to humanity, "text" which proudly boasts, by arguments stupid, wrong, shameful and without any moral value, non-woman's right to have his own body. The woman has her body, and if she wants to get rid of an error, a rape or something she does not envy, it is his right as firm and absolute in the universe.

He should stop saying all these fabrications that we destroyed a human being. I prefer the term "pregnancy termination". Especially if you want to get to the bottom of things, we should also ban the IUD and dispose of embryos "specimen". Criminalizing an action is often more harmful than tolerate it. @ Nino, your statement, worthy of a Harlequin novel, is of poverty and a "ready market" that we reversed.

The life of the new being (who is human) does not belong to the mother. Abortion = murder.

it is a crime even if humans have agreed otherwise

At present this must remain "the" 'very last resort, but it is not obvious, each story is unique, each woman should make that choice, their story is different … With all the means available to prevent pregnancy, especially in developed countries said it is true that we must carefully consider this gesture, now those cons, mingle with their lives, and refrain from judging that or anything, as they say the advisers are not paying, since it is not they who will have to assume that life …. I think before, all the women who died due to clandestine abortions, because they already have too many children, they were exhausted physically and morally, they were poor and had difficulty all food must then wonder what is worse, let these women in distress with a little bit extra that anyway will not have a normal life, will suffer from hunger, etc. …. Or abortion? Each story is unique! A. Or abortion? Each story is unique! Currently, there are still women who do not have their word to say about anything, and besides making children do nothing else, I am against these gentlemen who judge, while it is not they who bear and suffer all this. And they are quiet on that side, since in any case, they have only a small stake tiny compared to women. When the woman is in danger, yes Originating from a rape, yes error, accident, abuse of trust (and young gentleman bar) of course, yes, again it is the woman who is penalized and must bear alone. .. We do not punish the girls by forcing them to keep their baby, it's stupid …. The child will be unwanted unhappy and will end badly and it will be more problems for society …. The vicious circle what …

So you think that the baby has perhaps not wrong when abortion is a good argument to allow abortion. With such considerations, then we can also say that killing someone is not serious if it does not suffer (for example if you kill him in his sleep, or if we kill him quickly with a bullet in the head ). It is clear that this argument is invalid. It is often said that freedom ends where someone else's begins. The woman who chooses an abortion does not have his body but the life of her child which she has no rights. Otherwise, a parent would also have the right to kill a child after birth, eg because the child reminds him cruelly her husband left her. Some mothers sometimes regret having a child, but many regret having an abortion and also think about the rest of their lives. Being afraid that the child is unhappy is a fallacious argument. What are the criteria that make such a person is happy and the other not? All. What are the criteria that make such a person is happy and the other not? Toutdépend each. If the financial situation is invoked by some, why not remove the child when the parent loses his job and the end of the month gets tough? Some also say that the aborted child is not yet a human being, but only a cluster of cells. However, these cells are cells characteristic of human beings. Any student with a biology knows. Once fertilization is a human being is created, separate from its mother cell, with a specific DNA will remain hers until the end of his life to be killed in the womb or that it dies of old age in his bed, 100 years later. The embryo, the fetus is not yet regarded as a human being by law some say. But we see that these laws are not fair because the country following the deadline for abortion varies. Do you find that logic is a human being after 14 weeks in some countries, in others after 12, after 24 elsewhere? The only step is the indisputable. Do you find that logic is a human being after 14 weeks in some countries, in others after 12, after 24 elsewhere? The only step is indisputable lafécondation. Besides, the law is no guarantee of morality. If not what to think of anti-Jewish Nazi or Vichy? Rape is certainly a terrible ordeal and the woman raped is undoubtedly a victim, but if she aborts it in turn becomes an executioner oting itself an innocent life. Abortion is murder and I do not care if some call me a c. .., this shows the respect they have for their fellow man.

circumcision is mutilation inflicted by barbarians. Do you want us removing you a look just to see?

the Muslim women to disfigure their acid gives them kicked in the groin and sodomizing rape girls from 3 years to the point of irreparable sequelae

I do not know, but it is in French culture getting rid of the baby by throwing them to the trash

Female circumcision is a barbaric act does not prohibit this inhumane practice. This shows your hypocrisy and your vision finally retrograde against women. After that you're against abortion, it will pass. I'm for medical abortion in cases of "accident" (eg unwanted pregnancy due to condoms to crack), in cases of rape, but I am against abortion for "convenience" (eg : people who do not protect yourself then who can).

for men circumcision tantamount to castration! I'm very favorable to the castration of some religious advocates the castration of women! for abortion, you're right, nothing beats a good premature ejaculation and no more trouble!

I do not see the connection between the two. . . You see one, you? . . .

Bad argument … I am against circumcision and abortion (to the extent reasonable, it's still a risky medical tehnique therefore best avoided …)… Female circumcision is banned … abortion should remain a "spare" and not become a "means of contraception" …

Abortion is not a value! the right or choice to do so is one! should not make abortion a contraceptive. and France is 12 weeks maximum and the embryo is about 5 cm. After you have the right to be against and not to practice it.

Circumcision does not kill? How many women died of infection after undergoing this unnecessary mutilation, disfigurement they have not chosen? Abortion is the right of women to control their own bodies, whether you like it or not. A woman is the property of anyone and if it does not bear children, it is his choice and it must be followed, especially since abortion is subject to a deadline for it does has no place when the embryo has become a fetus, that is to say a conscious being. The good value is to respect the physical integrity of persons, not to mutilate them against their will.

Who are you? An Ayatollah?! Excision is to banish from the face of the earth! THE SURFACE OF THE EARTH !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Castration does not kill either. Would you want me to castrate story to consider the issue at its fair value? Excision is a castration of women and I am personally in favor of castration of all fathers who castrate their daughters. Something tells me that it would stop this crime dramatically. Having said that abortion is another crime, but the baby dies quickly. The girl mutilated suffer his entire life because his father is a dog who is afraid of women and their sexuality

it will not, because it is what does not kill it must be legitimized? it is a barbaric practice and I doubt that you're well informed because many girls die because of this unspeakable act!

he dares to defend the excision the patient!

I am against circumcision as if nature do the female anatomy in this way this is not a coincidence women must be respected and they are entitled to enjoy as much as men nature is so well done respect On-the! Abortion that is an act that I find Barbarian that is killing a baby Your baby a human life that is a killing a woman who WANT TO SEND TO AIR S I'LL DO IT WELL THAT SHE WANTS SEX WITH HER BUT IT MUST BE LIABLE TO PROTECT ASSUME BECAUSE THIS CHILD DID NOT REQUEST so if you do something stupid or assumes birth anonymously and let this baby will be less selfish AC and the child has a family and love LIFE IS SAVED C HOW TO BE A HUMAN HAND I AM NOT AGAINST RAPE CASES IN SOME PROBLEMS OF HEALTH OR THE LIFE OF THE MOTHER AND THE CHILD IS IN DANGER SERIOUS GENETIC DISEASES incest ETC

At the stage can have an abortion, the embryo is nothing more than an embryo, not a life, a human being, then you prefer to come to earth when he was unwanted? And to become what? To live miserably (the reasons for which his arrival was not desired), to suffer, to come to suicide? So you that inflicts suffering, you do not save lives but destroyed two (mother, child and older), sadistic!

in both cases the victim "is not conscious." but does that justify murder?

In the case of abortion you kill some cells if it is in early pregnancy in the case of an adult you kill a conscious person who has lived There is no mention of victim in the case of a person, fertilized ovum is not regarded as being a person

A fetus is an embryo, not a human being.

You really poses the question here? It's your best argument? The difference between an embryo and an adult? One is a been fully developed and autonomous. The other a small cluster of cells unable to survive outside the womb. One is already alive, the other not. One is a human being, the other not. Priestess @: I accept your argument ^^… I concluded that … Does it can still be semi-solid cannibalism?

1) Remove cells that are not even yet become a "person", and 2) kill "a human being" itself are two different things. In the first case, it allows the woman, who is free to do what she wants with her body and not be forced to have a dependent child if she does not feel ready or if n 'has the capacity (or even if she does not want, freedom requires a large number of possibilities). In the second, it is murder – because it is a human being born – and it will incur a prison sentence. I do not know how to explain it better. @ Sun Palestine: maybe you're upset for rape? It's weird as a principle, each his own eh. You're all well understood my words … I'll rephrase … you know many people who are scrambling to break / be raped? Rape is sexual intercourse involuntary victim (usually the woman) … if it results in a pregnancy, you must keep the poor victim the child of a psychotic monster? That we can understand ^ ^

The same as between oral sex and cannibalism.

That's 2 lives destroyed. The fetus is a living being called to life as a man or woman. the embryo is also a "living" in a human formation in the womb. Killing a person is unconscious, asleep, unconscious is murder in the same way that killing a conscious person. Do not compare abortion to murder someone who is already living outside the womb. An abortion is an abortion but it ends with a promise of life as a human being viable. You should better define what a "murder." In fact what do you really know your question so difficult?

An abortion is "murder of a man but not an embryo: an entity resembling a strawberry that has no independent life. A baby breathes, smiles, participates in its own way to human life. Second difference: The embryo is a part of the body of the mother. It's still up to her "his belly". Third difference: The mother is participating in a network of relationships and responsibilities far greater than that of the embryo. Her Life has a preponderance over that of the embryo. A death is a death but all the deaths were not the same psychological weight. An abortion is always a pain and trauma but obvious question is where is the "least evil ", the" least suffering ". The suffering of a woman who can not bear the idea of taking a child takes precedence over" souffreance (?) of an embryo.

the mother may abort the fetus if ONLY endangers her life or it would be premeditated murder. I like the philosophy of my neighbors above that justify abortion just to avoid liability to have a future baby to be conceived is jostling to become responsible and it sneaks! @ V For: Go! very good question you ask is, I admit that it is not easy to keep a baby after being raped, but I confess that do not know the view of my religion in such cases. Good question!

Human life must be respected whatever their stage of development from egg to the extreme age

earlier question .. I already answered you're a guy, leaves women a choice. the day your sister will break the day … or your wife will wait for a child with serious birth defect or disease rendering it non-viable …. will stop at the prudishness

abortion is a crime!

Frankly, you'd better not meddle with what you watch, and stop with all your "issues" anti-abortion that are used strictly for nothing .. wind is all that! legal abortion or not has always existed, and it's not that kind of talk to the jerk who will change anything .. Women are masters of their body, whether you like it or not, and the risk of disappointing you, there was no justification for anything! What do you think it's really the least of our worries …

It's terrible to see people speak of a living being growing at a phenomenal rate to become a child as a vulgar piece of gadget that is available as desired! Where is the will of the child in an abortion? Where is the right of the unborn child and live? Abortion not dispose of his body, have another one who can not pronounce. Of course it's terrible as a gesture for those women who went into action, it is with a heavy heart she did so, the fear directs, and this often causes irreparable injury! Frankly, it's time to ask if he had not been better for these women to keep the child rather than abort. I remind you that the deadline for abortion varies by country! Abortion is legal in two months in France 5 months in other countries. Have you ever seen the echoes and the child in the womb at 2,3,5,6 months? Well, in one case we are talking about children, and in another a gadget to remove annoying! It is completely. Have you ever seen the echoes and the child in the womb at 2,3,5,6 months? Well, in one case we are talking about children, and in another a gadget to remove annoying! It complètementhypocrite. Abortion is not a solution and millions of lives are suppressed for years under the pretext of freedom of women. I am a woman and it disgusts me to see such arguments! Abortion is source of problems, suffering, trauma, and made women believe that it will solve their problem. And precision: the abortions after rape are a tiny minority, it does not even represent 1%.

So if I understand correctly, you consider the embryo as a cluster of cells. But in this case, you are too! You too are composed of cells connected together, each having a specific role. The embryo also. You and him are not "clump of cells" but a living organism. I have thousands of arguments proving that life begins not at birth, but the encounter between an egg and sperm, that magic moment when the draft begins life: already, the child has his own agenda genetics. The body sends messages to prepare for this newcomer. Another argument, the dependence of this Peita man to his mother. But an infant is it not as dependent as he? And you, resist you naked without food in Antarctica? No. We all depend. And kill the weak is a crime, cowardice. MISUNDERSTOOD LIFE IS NOT A FORCE!

While we have yet found anything better than abortion to practice eugenics under the guise of humanism (malformed children, genetic defects, the mother of poverty, etc. …). Question a little provocative, but deserves consideration on its merits. @ Jay Casimir Where do you see an opposition? On the contrary, they complement. @ Jay Casimir You're confusing eugenics and neonaticide. One example: why do we see less and less with DS in our societies? Just because the medicine can detect this genetic abnormality before birth, and indeed they are aborted. This is called an abortion therapeuthic. Question: who is this therapeuthic? Not for the fetus, since it does not live! For the human race then? If this is not eugenics that, what is it? @ Francis The idea came from the Malthusian, I think. @ Sonnen There is no time limitation for IMG. And I know that despite their disabilities disability are happy to live. A fetus with a disability is as innocent as a fetus that is. A fetus with a disability is as innocent as a fetus n'estpas disabled. No? The abortion because it is believed that his disability is a burden on society, it is eugenics. No?

I do not know anyone who is serious for both eugenics and cons of abortion. These are the results of two opposing doctrines, in my opinion. @ Al: Being in eugenics, that killed at birth. Being against abortion is saying yes to life. Incompatibility, I think.

The man and his paradoxes …

Excellent question, thank you. For my part I am not for eugenics, but for abortion THE SOLE DISCRETION OF CONCERNED (not a social problem but an individual problem), in extreme cases such as rape, risk of death for Mom, trisomy or other serious risk to the baby. I am opposed to abortion in other cases. We have enough means of contraception in order to manage a priori the birth rate. @ Sonnen, tests are performed on the 3rd month for trisomy … and abortion can be performed.

Can. We can do everything. Like, for example, be against abortion on a right to life of an embryo (and human life is sacred, even in pregnancy) but advocate the death penalty. And for good human beings this time.

The ideology of extreme right opened the eradication of naturally disadvantaged people "especially for health reasons" in World War II shows! And just after the war the abuser of women has been institutionalized. Instead of aborting women why not castrate men! if only medically

I'm actually in this case: Currently abortion is primarily for reasons of convenience: parents do not feel how to accommodate an additional child, single mother and not for eugenic reasons. If it detects a case of trisomy in the 6th month of pregnancy, not miscarried. Many orphan diseases are detected too late for an abortion. Now I'm sorry, but a healthy child can live a happy life with adoptive parents. It should rather refer mothers who do not take care of a child to abandonment. In contrast, children with disabilities, especially in the case of multiple disability or mental disability will be miserable all their lives and will load all their lives for their parents and society. I am not opposed to the coup de grace when he was the only decent solution … @ Almire: A serial killer is a noxious: the felling is to save his future victims. By contrast a baby is a totally innocent man who has committed no crime to deserve the death that you want it. By contrast a baby is a totally innocent man who has committed no crime to deserve the death that you want luiinfliger. I notice the illogic of the supporters of the killing of babies that are to safeguard the lives of murderers @ AL: quite, I said initially I am in favor of eugenics, but not to abortion reasons of personal convenience or financial. What is the most common case today. I would add that it depends on the disability. If we can sail, we can offer him a life about right, but I'm talking multiple disabilities: http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polyhandicap there is more generous to offer her a quick death.

And those against the 2? I do. Against abortion (not tell me of abortions in rape cases this represents only 2% of abortions) and against any form of eugenics. However I am for IMG in case of severe disabilities. In the kind that would prevent the person from having his own life. But not because he is a dwarf or something lightweight. I know a specific example.

Funny as a question …. For me it is not inherently paradoxical, but it depends what is meant by eugenics. It seemed that eugenics was the desire to create the best possible beings. But when I talk about creating the best things I mean manipulating the embryo from the 1st stages of development into a perfect being has his taste. This is in no way opposed to abortion. For we may well wish to manipulate the embryo offspring as the desire, without resorting to abortion if this operation should fail, right?

Because sometimes the mother is too young so she too can not handle the baby, but instead of an abortion can be put in the freezer too like that the baby is too criohygieniser and mom has too much time and grow like that when she has too work too and can take care of the baby she is too much in the microwave (be careful too not to thawing and after cooking if it is a mess).

The freezes it leaves traces, better go to the Seine and attached to the baby swing. Neither seen nor known

That was a joke! Not funny.

Dummy! C You're not even funny HACA!

But one does not see the other!

You seem bothered you. Well, if you have a little bun in the cupboard, takes. Maybe later you can no longer. In 1990, a young lady had already opened this topic with me, and I say "Take." The result of my board is a pretty girl who is now married. P. .. Time passes quickly.

Yes, euthanasia is also

Yes! Sm

Yes but it is the worst of all.

with all the aids of today … I do not think.

Yes, for several reasons. 1) The cost of contraception 2) Not able to take her child is doing when we do not already

really not as rich or poor a baby can be born and live in good condition in France over there a lot of help

probably because you have no right to sell your toddler on the net!

Sure. What if you are pregnant and you know you can not provide adequately for a child? It's sad but at the same time, in a sense, courageous and highly responsible.

Nan I do not think I lived in an old car (a dove lol) when I was pregnant with my first son, Vui I was on the street and I've finally got an apartment, and you must move 'll aid that will allow you to raise your child. then that is your choice to you to keep it or not but you have to fight for your ideas and make your own choices, finally it 's just my experiences! Good luck to you. )

It may be a reason for seeing that this solution

yes poverty may be a reason for abortion, but is this a valid reason? I do not think so. as poor as it can be when one has performed an act we must assume it to be assumed and those there responsable.donc ke ki kil pretext parcekil abort her poor would be better to abstain, or use contraceptives . because they say the "bed of the poor is fruitful."

find a compassionate doctor and then suffer and perhaps die during childbirth, there is no other alternative ..

We must go to a foreign country that authorizes it. I have always advised against abortion even if you are very young an old friend of my mother had been aborted because she was young and a few years later she could ever have and she has remorse and until those 'at the end of his days. So do not take chances keep the child is not known what the fate in store for the future and you will be happy not to have made stupidity. A former neighbor had a child 15 years now she can no longer have to cancer and she is very pleased to have been smart to keep her child despite very young age at the time.

Hey Sarah! If there is a real risk to the child or mother must be attempted, if possible, to travel to a country more liberal on the subject … But hey I admit that it's really very difficult to give advice to someone who faces this kind of situation. Kisses

your question is not easy as a part going to another country that permits abortion and as you say, you are young then to go to another country not facile.mais you're pregnant how many months? After you have other solution as I am not, but it passed after your childbirth because there are so many who can not have children, but if you n'avortes not and you choose the Adoption requires that thou mayest be sure because you can very well change your mind after childbirth while trying to keep, I know one person who wanted to abandon her child and to adopt and who chose to keep just after birth I am against abortion but I would judge each person as his top choice, then you can go see a midwife for pmi and (or) family planning to fill discuss steps you can do that is to be abortion or childbirth, but I do not really see what to tell you more, because I do not know how long are you pregnant ect …

Moving to a foreign country that allows abortion, and use contraception (pills, condoms …) for other sex. Good luck to you.

Go to abort you elsewhere. Keep the baby. Keep the baby and give it to adoption. And of course, after the abortion or childbirth take effective contraception.

Abortion in another country

Hey Sarah! Especially if you talk about yourself, you are very very funny I never thought of asking for "guidance" on the INTERNET for the subject is so serious … You do not of "family planning" in your country??? OR at least one gynecologist (femme. .. if possible) to give you??? I wish you good morale and good luck, because "the abortion tourism" is something much more sad for the girls who want abortions. .. I have no children, and what you write makes me sad … if you are really pregnant! Hugs Sarah!

Why not legalize alcohol in Islam? I talked with a Catholic woman of 60 who slept with his 40 year old son! The reason? The wine is often drunk in the Catholic Mass, the cathedral, buttocks, dinners, morning and night even during the burial of their dead! The Catholic woman after drinking with her son, they danced and then the son bandaged and then he took his mother on four legs! I mean it all! Long live the Catholic faith! In France, land of windmills red Catholic, to drink alcohol to children 8 years mixed with water! in cases of drunkenness, incest begins! In French there are two million of incest! It just speaks of cases discovered by the curious, the children never wear a complaint! this number should be 10 million! But wait! Incest between two adults is entirely legal in France! This custom home! the woman who has been penetrated by his son has four legs can not be prosecuted under the law of theFrance mills red! Not to mention the other crimes committed under the influence of alcohol blessed Catholics, such as fetal alcohol syndrome that affects fetus year 7000 after the French are suddenly dead fetus and breastfed babies with milk-alcoholic mom. Road accidents, crimes, rape, disease, cancer each year in France ect mills red, 45,000 (1) die because of alcohol not to mention patients, each year there are 7000 women who died because of alcohol! since September 11 which killed 3000 people, there would enriron 380,000 deaths in France mills red because of the drink without counting the crimes, the sick, the mad, the transmission of STDs as family breakdown! ! a real genocide add to this the victims of the cigarette 64 000 deaths per year (2)! since September 11, 2001, he was therefore 512 380 892 000 = dead because of drinking and smoking in France mills red! Make computing. !!!!!!!!! The misfortune of France mills red just drinking, drunks France is the second country in terms of consumption of alcohol! Alcohol is so much national pride the red mill doctors advise people to drink to be called to suffer in the virtues of French wine lol, gold alcohol is a real poison for the human body! no profit! The crushing defeat of France against the red mills Nazi is from the drink according to German sources! lamoitié French soldiers were drunk, without the help of Muslim soldiers from Africa sober France of drunks could never have independence! NATO has tried to introduce Taliban drink because sober Taliban are hard to beat! Why not legalize alcohol in Islam? (1) http://www.retourvital.com/Alcool.php (2) http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki / # Impact_du_tabagisme_sur_la_sant.C3.A9 Tobacco

Why legalize it in Islam if you quote the same time all the evils of alcohol?

you just created the ultimate weapon

Jesus himself was turning water into alcohol

You're back?

my guys if you skid you are from Blue Cross I do not quite know what is not how you're going to stop drinking

Alcohol is just to get drunk and hurt around you, it has naportekoi ke people believe its a silly one's been!! and the gov is ékeuran

And sodomy in churches

Firstly, there is a difference between alcoholism and drink a little alcohol. The Bible forbids drunkenness (= excessive consumption of alcohol). Furthermore, I do know that fruits are good numbers of their own alcohol (without human intervention). This alcohol has a very low dose of alcohol but still: Will you stop eating at all???

Islam does not prohibit alcohol without reason! It forbids the evil that did this in our bodies through alcohol (such as smoking etc), the acceptance would overrule a principle of religion is to say respect for her body!

Glad to see you again! I began to worry, to think that maybe you were dropped into the hole of time that you brought to the Middle Ages, and that you did not know get out. It would have been bad because your numbers (which you will not ever give the source) and your hatred put a little spice in this category! This is what your next question? I hope you do not lose your list, you laugh a little! Good idea legalization of alcohol. The Taliban take us very poppy, it would be a little back to the sender! If you would have forgotten I am the frog-eating Belgian, who ate only once in a (long) life, but which, cons, loves mussels and fries that go with!

You'd better read the bases on which Islam is based test and also to understand this noble religion for such advice does not arise, sorry. Good evening

1-D'abort incest is an abomination in the Catholic religion like Islam. 2-Your comments are insulting to us Catholics. 3-In light of your words can actually ask you is not in Sir a state of intoxicated.

sick …

Islam forbids alcohol, but not sodomy long as women remain "virgins"

Why, given the content of their book is a glorification of murder, not to ban Islam? That said, I think you're among those who do not drink wine without getting drunk. Drink water! It is not too polluted. Just a little more than wine.

Yes, well, the argument is surprising and I believe theologically wrong. Alcohol is not banned because it is bad, it is forbidden because God willed it so. Man can not allow what God has forbidden, because man is not the source of divine law. The source of God's law is God.

that chastity belts will finally be reimbursed by the secu?

Is it me or does this question make sense? @ Sonnen should also specify that the belt is a myth invented in the nineteenth century (the century's most rigid).

At the same time before thinking of abortion, there's contraception, eh … Breeze darling!

Anything.

you are complicated. prout!

More ridiculous, I die … 1 – Navy supported the freedom of abortion. She fell out with Anthony and why traditional cathos 2 – The first to be damn embarrassed by the chastity belt would be a Jean Marie and some Navy. They are not Gauls for nothing! This thing has no future in France. You taxed the entire population becomes locksmith and porter …

Yep it, learn yourself better, my boy. Marine Le Pen simply does not go back on the right to abortion. Now it is up to her that we must look now, not to his old dad … The FN knows better than you imagine adapt to the times, and the profile of the electorate has changed significantly and rejuvenated. As for the chastity belt, as the sex aid, at a pinch … Besides, you've lost the key?

The FN will never be king of France … So it's settled …