muslims are taking the country. some are stoning adulterous women or men, others are whipping, others do not throw stones nor the whip. in some brothels are legal (Turkey, Tunisia, etc.) in other prostitution is prohibited. some countries muslims tolerate drug production (Afghanistan, Morocco), in others it is forbidden. in some countries justify terrorism by muslims their religion, others do not. Saudi Arabia is forbidden for a woman to drive a car, it exists nowhere else. in some countries (Egypt, Iraq, Palestine) were physically attacked the Christians and killed or put in jail as in Algeria, or they are forbidden to practice their religion altogether (Saudi Arabia) while Islam would advocate tolerance. age of sexual maturity is completely different depending on whether one lives in the Maghreb and Yemen. some countries have even muslims liberalized abortion. the muslims say that the burqa is contrary to Islam, others not. of muslims believe that Islam. of muslims believe that islamn'est not contrary to secularism and democracy, others do not etc. etc. amusing detail in Algeria that illustrates my question and the schizophrenic of this religion: the constitution stipulates that Islam is the religion official and that power belongs only to the people (and not to Allah?) the muslims are saying that there is a Koran, a single text, but there's so many different interpretations as muslims! @ Quetzal: ok but often it's nuances … the Baptist (0.000 .. 1% of Christians) wish that baptism is done in adulthood. good it will not look away! @ Firedamp: Algeria's called "democracy" in its constitution from which this report is established between the government and the people. Democracy is power to men. in a democracy the laws are the laws that men have developed for men, it does not come from the Koran or other antics … @ Adrian: I can give you all my sources of information which are strictly accurate. and if you were not an Arab-Muslim. and if you were not an Arab-musulmanparesseux hidden you could check it yourself on the internet

It is true that the contradictions are legion in the Islamic world but I do not see why you add in relation to Christianity, who also is full of contradictions either in space or in time!

Because everything is consistent in the Bible? Synoptic and apocryphal terms that are perhaps not talking.

There you are, or ignorant or in bad faith. We're talking about 72 or 73 sub-sects or movements of Islam? You know how many branches of Christianity today? Here is a list of key, it is of course not exhaustive, there are more than 3,500 Christian sects identified so far … http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Christian_denominations At least a hundred Pentecostal, Lutheran a hundred, a hundred Baptists, hundreds of Anglican, and these are only the largest among the Protestant only .. . There you delusions ….

islamohpbe vomit … toilet is flushed, it stinks

This is due to a syndrome, a form of superiority complex that makes you feels so "superior" one becomes intellectually lazy … You're right to note the paradox: Islam and democracy are completely incompatible and contradictory because Islam says that man must be subject only to "god" and recognizes no human authority. Except … Except that the authority of god does not come from God but a man, a prophet who claims to be sent from god: he says. What is the evidence? NO! Finally, Mouloud claim that the Quran is the proof. Ouiiii Ah, the Koran, the book says that the earth is flat and the sun revolves around … MDR!

the details of which you allude fun denotes a schizophrenic without limit your person, your normal c igorence guide you say betisses without measurements. the same constitution also states that the people are the source of all power. poor ignorant power in question is one that forms the uniqueness of a people that the same spring that the ruler and the ruled, without it Would there be no life in society. divine power is different, it is proper to God, unbelievers like you were once claimed to hold the desired power, it was only despots who are no longer of this world and who now realize their creator. A word hello

I am not Muslim, but having studied Islam, I believe that most of the information you speak of is false. But hey why try to explain anything when you do not trust that what the media say and you do not do personal research. After it is obvious to one particular thing: Islam, like other religions, unfortunately, the good believers, and others who do not understand properly. This last category denigrate the image of religion. But if you do not make the effort to go a little further, how can you believe just take a speech?

there are many more contradictions in Christianity than in Islam, but what you got is partly true, I'll tell you the cause of all this: it certainly ONE QURAN, no Muslim country but does apply to the letter even Saudi Arabia!

They do not baptize their children almost bastards! They are for abortion shameful thing !!!…. Here are two example .. what do you think? Chtonk I'm perfect! I have no default so if I'm finished you're a piss me.rde! Caraille it means nothing is caralho you make it a good Palhaço you clown!

Yes we are entered in the XXI century, it will do …

and volunteer, you've been over to piss you .. the term "free choice", it speaks to you or that you totally beyond? @ Dding: lol … have expired cottage cheese instead of the brain and adversely affect your level of perfection … but you're sure to be a beast, as it is with this that you judge …

He remains happily issues on which France is ahead of others. The fact that a woman can have her body as she hears it and does not impose a religion on a newborn are part of this progress must be defended at all costs.

And yes the French have had the misfortune to use their brains and discovered that religions are nonsense fabrics ….

The leaders of the revolution of 68 told them that to be happy he had forgotten God and to enjoy. To enjoy, it should consume. The French have abandoned the churches to fill the supermarkets. So, happy?

And why do you insult you bastards of their children. Chtonk is absolutely right, you were finished with the piss and then you got rolled in the merd.e, you can feel it from here!

You're retarded and that what you say that binds you. Fortunately we have the right to disagree with you. You know why we are atheists? You figure that they liked moderately religious people do not care that their pockets in connivance with the Kings. It has a long history of cutting head at this level.

Well if t''es perfect stay in your wonderful country and fools us peace! It was the Revolution in 1789 and 1968 for the rights and freedoms and we are happy: we have the right to believe in a God or not, goat, cabbage stuffed one has the right to make kids not to do, and it is free of our bodies we passed the stage of "sub-sea …" slaves of men in short one IS HAPPY IN FRANCE! in fact perfect or not?

Because we can not stand to be manipulated, used and abused as you are!

But what I get involved abroad!

Who is this microcephalic gives us lessons … Go back to your cave, Cro Magnon (oh no shit I just insult Cro Magnon in comparison with you)

So caraille is not you who boasted of sleeping with older women? Ho clowns portugal, it's like their laundresses, when they do fart bubbles.

Yes, the French deny virtually all their values and one of the prime ideals of the republic, has always been to destroy the Catholic religion. They have more self esteem and even let rule by foreigners. This is only a small people.

Simply by what he is disillusioned by their history, clergy abuse, the abolition of privileges of the church, French Revolution, education, scientific and logical reasoning, but may also be because there are still such provocation which is useless! If it is to inflame hatred that serves no purpose either!

The world is changing but if you have money it's fine if you do not it ….

One of the unfortunate consequences of secularism direct …

Hello everyone, my friend has a big problem, she made out with a man soon makes AC 5years and still no marriage alone projects .. voila she comes out she is pregnant by her boyfriend 3 weeks who is afraid of his own parents put pressure him to go get an abortion when she has already had an abortion it just 2 months YS .. she loves this baby and wants to keep it because already in his thirties opportunities make a baby begins to decrease if it is his only chance to get?? also her boyfriend threatened to leave if she keeps the child … in your opinion what should it do?? helping the

At 31, I imagine that your friend has a stable job situation and is able to be independent so I do not see why his parents have the right and ability to put pressure on him. She is an adult and responsible for his actions. If she had an abortion two months ago … this new pregnancy, she has sought or when she and her boyfriend totally irresponsible! : S Anyway, above all, it must ask themselves whether it is willing and able (morally and financially) to take a child alone. Then there is the choice between this child and her boyfriend …

Hello everyone, my friend has a big problem, she made out with a man soon makes AC 5years and still no marriage alone projects .. voila she comes out she is pregnant by her boyfriend 3 weeks who is afraid of his own parents put pressure him to go get an abortion when she has already had an abortion two months ago .. she just loves this baby and wants to keep it because already in his thirties opportunities make a baby begins to decrease if it is his only chance to get?? also her boyfriend threatened to leave if she keeps the child … in your opinion what should it do?? helping the

"Helping the '? She is 31 years old! We do not know! Looks like a string for superstitious: if we do not move the story ridiculous, it's bad luck?

To her alone and make that decision, it is his body. Guys who threaten to leave if she miscarried is not a guy who is not worth the trouble. If she is able to raise her baby if she wants to keep her guard if she prefers abortion she aborts. Good luck with this difficult choice.

I wonder if with age, a virgin, ends up losing its physical assets. basically, if neither husband nor breastfeeding babies, is ensured to have nice tits for eternity?

Not always, up to 95 years only.

Never in my life …. not even 95 years ago at age 55 she began the wound

No no no .. Too bad for you;)

You're very funny! Virgin or not, the body of a woman ages, her body, her breasts will be firmer, but softened, the law of nature.

Have you ever forced a woman to abort! and why?

No ^ ^

Bah no! lol

it will not be accepted? " Certainly not. I am opposed in principle to the murder of children in the womb. I do understand that in a very small number of cases: health reasons, defects, etc. … But compelling?? I'm not Cheb Mammi is the worst form of violence against a woman, even worse than rape.

@ Sonnen, if I may, I would have to be a man not to find rape as the most abominable acts …

Question deleted by cults, issue rested. I found this prayer through a qriste (Thanks to him or her). A Prayer shattering intensity. I just wanted to share it and if it can help one of you, the question (and hate criticism that might happen …) will have at least been helpful. The relationship of Prayer is at the end of the matter. ————————————– Please … for an aborted child (say, if possible by the mother) Little Baby I'm sorry to have you refused. Heavenly Father I ask pardon for having withheld your gift of life. The name I chose for my baby is (ie the Christian name chosen for your child) Father Creator, now accept the child you gave me, I welcome it in Thy love and I declare that I love like you love her, I receive you as a great gift in my breast for him to grow month after month, until its birth. I want to give her life for it. I want to give her life for qu'ilsoit happy. This beloved child, I'll restores all my heart. I leave that to your mother, my mother, his mother the Virgin Mary standing at the foot of the Cross, for her to put in Your open side, pierced in Your Heart, O Jesus. Merciful Lord Jesus, heal me and frees my mind completely of any painful memories and trauma. Deliver my child and myself from any influence of the spirit of death, and heal my child from all his wounds of rejection and lack of love. Fills the Ta-Ta peace and joy that he rejoices in You, forever. Keep it on your Mary Immaculate Heart of Mother until, again, I can, I also take him in my arms and give her a kiss. Amen! ————————————– … I hope this prayer can comfort you a little or help. The link with the Prayer and some aid: http://www.mariereine.com/affiche.php3?ID=590&categorie=6 God bless all of His Love sad moms and all babies. Php3? ID = 590 & category = 6 May God Bless His love for all mothers and all bébésavortés sad. @ Added: This question is not there to judge or accuse the contrary, but those who see evil everywhere can not speak evil. @ Nina: Some women are sad after a lifetime act, and even others are traumatized … This kind of prayer can "exorcise" somehow the pain and make them understand that they are guilty of nothing and that their baby is with God.

You could take care of your sins in this Christmas season? It's easy to come give lessons to others! it saves you from everything you look, you've been making ugly this year?

sorry but for me it is a way to do even more harm to mothers who are forced to go through abortion

Only repentance before God can give peace. Isaiah 53, 3-6: 53.3 despised and rejected of men, a man of sorrows and acquainted with grief, like that we hid his face, as we have despised, we made him not. 53.4 However, it is our suffering it has brought, is our pain he was in charge, and we esteemed him stricken, Smitten of God, and afflicted. 53.5 But he was wounded for our transgressions, crushed for our iniquities: the chastisement of our peace was upon Him, And by His wounds we are healed. 53.6 We had all gone astray like sheep, each following its own path, And the Lord has laid on him the iniquity of us all. Abortion is the wrong solution, because God hears the prayers of those who are in distress and in need of His grace must still have faith. People who have had abortions need to repent to God, because it is a crime. The soul is immortal, and aborted souls. The soul is immortal, and the souls are reincarnated and still avortéesexistent. Abortion will always be marked in the memories eternal children "killed". See Council of Constantinople II: "The Council of Constantinople II (553) is where the Church suppresses reincarnation, which however had always been preached …". http://pages.intnet.mu/ramsurat/Jesus/Conciles.html Videos about reincarnation: http://www.google.fr/search?q=R% C3% A9incarnation + evidence & hl = en & client = safari & rls = en & PRMD = ivns & source = univ & tbs = vid: 1 & TBO = u & ei = jvUOTduKBIK28QO0qqyFBw & sa = X & oi = video_result_group & ct = title & resnum = 2 & ved = 0CCwQqwQwAQ Note: The reincarnation is true in many cases, but there is no salvation outside of Jesus Christ. Converting a Buddhist to Christianity: http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1wuzl_jesus-christ-est-vivant-je-l-ai-vu_people

if the abortion was to save the life of the mother I said, you will have another inchalah otherwise I would say this is a big sin and you will pay dearly if you do not sincerely repented

It is a very beautiful and very touching prayer. For all women who have had abortions and whatever their reason, they find peace in our Lord Jesus Christ. Amen.

it is a crime even if there are extenuating circumstances

He denounces the pronouncements of governments and continental institutions in favor of abortion, gay marriage or against religious symbols in public places such as crucifixes and nurseries! Feedback?

It is normal for the pope to defend the doctrines of the Church is its mission (or his job, if you prefer)

He defends the positions of another age

Pope denounces what offends Catholics, I think this is normal as the leader of the Roman Catholic church. He has the right like everyone to give his opinion.

If the Pope feels a victim of conspiracy, I asked him to wake up from his. He is a man among others, a simple "guide" spiritual. There is no god on earth and it is not only master the world. I know it's hard to find that the Vatican no longer dominates Europe. But that's life. These laws are justice and equality. They have nothing to do either for or against Christianity is not the navel of the world. I always thought that the problem has never been religious. The problem it has always been power. Too bad.

A pope said it so much crap!

we have what we deserve having abandoned the faith of our forefathers nature abhors a vacuum; Islam slowly returned to his caravan in the ideological underbelly of the West in gastro-decomposition

Abortion, gay marriage? It has nothing to Christianophobia, it does no particular religion, only that humanity progresses and understood that the religions of humanity are collective delusions. As we share one of these delusions we do not recognize as such. The day is approaching when all sects and religions will be tried and convicted for crimes against humanity.

Hello All this was predictable because it is the beginning of the collapse of Babylon the great (the world empire of false religion)

This is normal. These are positions to be against morality or against nature or against an old tradition! Do not be religious to appreciate this! Recently he has also spoken out against the persecution of Christians it was high time!

We do not care of the pope as our first slip.

The Pope is right. There is currently a monstrous hatred against Catholics and Catholicism, because we are under the reign of evil … Which is revered today is all that is contrary to morality, to the Word of God, the Catholic Church that Jesus Christ built 2000 years ago. Today to be well seen, it must advocate the death, murder, abortion, sex sado maso, homosexuality, hate, evil, rejection of all values of God and the Good. Jesus Christ, God the Son, we warned: 1Timothy 4:1 Now the Spirit expressly says that in latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits and doctrines of devils; Matthew 24:9 Then shall they deliver you to tribulation, and shall kill you: and ye shall be hated of all nations, because of my name. John 16:2 They will put you out of the synagogues: yea, the time is coming when whoever kills you will think to worship God.

YES Christianophobia is justified because c a bunch of perverts debile …. which does not provide any solution and just leave the field open al Islam http://prophetie-biblique.com/fr/islam-fondamental/ The 3 monotheistic religions are disasters for the human being …

And you see him celebrate gay marriage at the Vatican …. frankly … No, he can not that taking a conservative posture! He defends life and the institution of marriage from a Catholic point of view … By cons not Christianophobia …

The problem is that the Church, contrary to the world around and especially the state has changed, evolved. Some believers (I said: I am an atheist) does not recognize more in this Church.

WE ARE ALSO THE CHURCH HAS ALSO WE TO PICK UP, TO SHOW THE REAL WAY TO MAKE THE SACRIFICE, YOU DO NOT FEAR OR SHAME, TRANSMIT OUR KNOWLEDGE TO GO TO THE OTHER, THE WAKE UP PEOPLE LEAVE IN DERIVATIVES STARTING WITH OUR SAME … THE HOLY SPIRIT IS WE TAKE concrete initiatives DAILY

already have to stop to lick the ass .. but other invaders soft cheek, he likes it.

my cousin wants to divorce his wife, but he finds that his wife had an abortion when they were together and wants to terminate it if he ever consider a divorce. I wonder if he faces jail if she told the judge asleep in ca judge can not be ignored. He aborted his wife (they were in a marriage) for her to continue school without problems. please reply

And then? or is the problem? one has the right to abortion and divorce in France ..

I have not experienced this situation but I think she also wanted an abortion if she will not get it do.

At first, his wife could have refused at that time .. Did she was forced under duress to abort? If yes .. then indeed he may be prosecuted (and it would be totally legitimate!) Note I'm talking about physical restraint .. Saying "If you miscarried not I leave you," is not a constraint. If he does not stress so it does not risk anything .. the fact of wanting to divorce now no difference.

Where do they live? If it is in France, she chose to abort herself and her husband was unable to oblige. It's legal, so it can not "condemn". But all this is very sad. I am against abortion, even if I do not judge women who are really forced to make that choice … For others, it has become a commonplace method of contraception. I find this criminal attitude …

ca how you look? their privacy?

Unless him put the knife to her throat, I do not see why anyone would accuse your friend of his wife's abortion …

non-believers are the first to say that we are in a free country, in a democracy, it must be tolerant but when someone thinks differently, it is backward con see. That's your freedom? your democracy? if you feel the right to have your opinions, your ideas, you have to accept that others think differently, you think always right, and others have always wrong, everything you accuse the believers you made yourself you're not actually better than us. Abortion is a crime for me, yes a crime in some countries you can abort up to five months of pregnancy is no longer an embryo but a fetus, a child, what is it disturbing? Ah yes, it shows you face the truth, truth that you are not assuming, yes abortion is horrible and many women never recover. Yes I am disgusted when I see young girls and even women who cry after being reckless with a man and do not assume. Yes I am disgusted when I see young girls and even women who cry after being reckless with a man and who do not lesconséquences! Bouuuuh I am a naughty little extreme you say, but I totally do not care This is not a stranger to the internet that can tell me who I am and I know of no faith who are against abortion and they have kept their child. SAMIRA @ habib there are other alternatives to this kind situation, even if the child is conceived out of marriage we have no right to decide whether a human being is entitled to live or not @ kiela you are the perfect example of stupidity. first I do not live in a city (old prejudice two balls) what is the second report with bar p ***? you can insult the Maghreb all you want, I'm Comoros. reconstructions related to the hymen? you better turn your finger seven times before writing this bunch of nonsense, you're all alone discredits my poor @ ted Give me an argument for abortion, abortion is killing a child realizes you leave? not compare it to racism, then think of what you want

This depends on the situation … If this child was conceived by an inappropriate relationship, it would be better to do the abortion if you can! He should think about his future and what we can guarantee him afterwards, but most do not undertake to repair a fault with another. In another case, which is supposed to be between married, I'm against it. And to you see.

I am not a believer, and I am not against abortion, I do not think it is a crime and we simply points of view, and it does neither you nor me of extremists. There is nothing wrong with that, and those who are in the wrong are rather those who criticize our views, which are indisputable.

There is no harm in being against abortion because it is a crime. Http://fr.answers.yahoo.com/question/index; _ylt = Ak0JVR3koInRqOiTldTW2Zg5Agx.; _ylv = 3? Qid = @ 20100411082001AAT87pW Inches down, how do you call it: http://www.abortionno.org/Resources/pictures.html

You're not well: my poor and compassion you do not know. Because Muslims do not belong here in the clinic? And there in the corn is far worse. I do not wish you an abortion (I do not know either) but if a guy who knows your city does not take you in the cellar for a rotary – what will you do? And what do you think: Forced marriages of young girls with old perverts cousins? From the overwhelming number of girls in your religion that are in France again hymen? The Maghreb bar whores? "Let her who has never cast the first with errors stone "I do not regard you as a woman and it is not unknown for small miserable and poorly screwed internet that can tell me what is wrong. OKSANA

Democracy and freedom is not to have convictions intolérentes, middle ages and inconsistent. If you thought that, well you're wrong. If tomorrow I say "down all the blacks" or "cancer is good, it will be neither democracy nor freedom, but the stupidity. Humpty @ = Encourage people to guard against future disabled children, finding that a girl of 16 years is spoiling the life of a child under the excuse of "it must assume", claim that the embryo is a human whereas the facts show otherwise, expect rape give children …… all that is NOT based on "respect for human life" and "the equal dignity of all" . Humpty @ = "you have to tell young people" you're not ready / willing to do a kid? Do what it takes to avoid! " >>> Um, yes, we all agree with you, but once that is done? I do not know if you noticed, but we are talking about AFTER the design … not before. It would be good. It would be good quetu followed a bit … "What facts? ">> Well the fact that before the fetal stage, the embryo is not a natural person as the main organs did not appear. This fact. The same fact is accepted by the law and ethics, the same one that protects people like you … "In my case I found that the obvious objective fact the difference is the meeting egg / sperm ">> The problem is that" what concerns you "does not concern us, and do not look at these women who suffer. The embryo is not a separate being. Whether or not you think it will be the same thing, sorry. If I amused myself by saying "in my case, the earth is flat", I'm not sure it would make it really flat. Well there is none. "I hardly consider the fact to find that the life of a disabled child it is better to nip it in the" egg ">> Unfortunately, this proves that you are not very aware of the suffering disabilities engender. If your daughter had a child at 14, qu'elledevrait stop studying and go to work at the factory to bring it to life with a monthly minimum wages, certainly you rethought your capricious judgments. And to answer your reflection on the fact "kill a child," I reply before 3 months of pregnancy, it is not a child, not even a fetus, but an embryo. In no case is a murder, because the embryo is a quasi single cell, ie without consciousness or emotions. Before proclaiming this kind of "pseudo beliefs," we try to learn. It's quite a funny coincidence that those who are anti abortion are always those who know nothing … Finally, I quote: "You have the right to not like black people as you do not disturb keep the peace, so that's democracy. " Not my great, the fact of not liking black people is to judge a community and is punishable by law. It is by no democracy. Because that premium, you do not know thee + in democracy??? I do not you throw the stone, it. Because that premium, you do not know thee + in a democracy??? I do not you throw the stone, making c'esttoujours speak who know the + -… Samira @ = " doctors are against abortion. And then? If tomorrow is a president for the war? If a football star is conducive to racism? If a lawyer is for the death penalty? We should stop confusing "power" and "morality." Doctors are for abortion? Well I'm not surprised: there are people who lack ethics, and there are obscurantist everywhere … even among doctors. "I am opposed to women who do not have the stupid things they have done, it's easy to cry after! ". >> Samira, here it is not a playground. The arrival of a child in poor conditions, it is a little more serious than "must not come crying" or "they have to assume". Everyone makes mistakes, and everybody 's has no chance of being saved from hardship. When a child can avoid potential life miserable, and although we do. And it has far more important than "give a good. And it has far more importance than "give to women who come bonneleçon cry." Unfortunately for you, I know what I say. An embryo is not considered a human life and abortion is not murder, but the impediment of a vital development. It's like that, and it's not me who invented it. Let me guess: in this course, you were at the bottom of the class near the radiator, right? You can stay on your positions contemptuous and naive, but years ago that the world has changed allowing women and children of avoid lives of suffering. You do not accept it? Well it must. Samira @ = I reassure you, you do not work at all for the wicked, any more than for someone in pain experience and knowledge. "Embryo is not considered that human does not mean it is not ">> really? So we are still in the area of your "beliefs", which does not weigh heavily in the balance. "Majority of women who abort are idiots who have been careless with a man who cares a lot". The majority of women who abort are idiots who have been careless with a man who cares not mald'elles">> I'll repeat myself, but here it is not a playground. These women, you treat a silly (contemptuous that! Lol) do not deserve to suffer, and these potential children either. Lives have wasted much more important than your preconceptions about a "silly women" "imprudent" to whom we must "teach a lesson" You're talking about something more serious than your "they are idiots," they just cry "or" their guy does not care. "Samira @ =" t agree ''re too smart you know everything better than everybody you're happy? "Pardon? What is this story? You may think that is important in an exchange of "know everything better than everyone" or to have the last word? You're still here? "I thought that it was serious … So this is it? You lose face? Too bad … Know that I still do not pretend to know better than others. I only remind you that your ideas are in contradiction. I only remind you that your ideas are contradictionavec science and with ethics. Besides, the majority of responses to your question in this direction. Sincerely, Alongado @ = I read your comment, and I wondering what could push a People wanting to impose suffering on women and broken ruin the lives of hundreds of potential children. I found suspect your position, because when you love life, we do not like the wasted lives. And then I continued to read you … and I found dozens of lines of religious proselytism. I understand better.

Let me be very clear: I am pro-abortion's societal and anti-abortion in the personal domain, 1. My wife and I never practiced abortion, we are in this sense against abortion. Abortion is a crime for you, nobody can or has the right to impose on you the opposite … You will never be overwhelmed by abortion, it's your choice! 2. But from a legislative standpoint, I am strongly pro-abortion. Those who want abortion should be able to do so in conditions of hygiene and safety necessary. A paradox? No I am pro-choice, I am for freedom. Especially in this area where the crime is a subjective concept, the question is whether the embryo is a human being or not? I think not, but this does not prevent the embryo already love this … I like my cat who is not a human being …

We, the Judeo Christian tradition from the life begins at conception. They, among other Chinese, from Confucian life begin at birth. Who is right?

is your right and the other with these cities, but really what prejudices! rotating cities, hymen reconstruction: how old you really to make such amalgams inept!

In a simple context, abortion is a crime. But, you see, there are cases that should concern us such as: – Being pregnant after being raped! Keep this embryo, all your life, you go up the stage to the head. What about the child born, son of the rapist ….? Being pregnant and now the doctor finds that the seed that you wear will be an enormous health scandal and he would not survive after ten years. If an early pregnancy, you should stop to avoid the worst of the suffering of the child born before die .. ….. ……. etc. The examples are numerous and difficult. I understand those who are against this but we must also try to understand those who are for …. This is bad, are those who volunteer or those without medical or social …. These are the behaviors of those who offend because they bypass the property based and abuse at will, alas!

There are laws of creation (Acts of God) must always be respected. When humans can be contravened the laws of Nature, it will sooner or later experience the consequences of his actions (reciprocity effect)

Hello, everyone is entitled to his opinions. This will assume that the embryo is a piece of flesh, soulless, unconscious, and there is no harm in eliminating it. Maybe some they will consider it as a mistake, bad memories of a relationship arises? Maybe some people will kill convinced that the future will be bleak for him because they did not believe the comfort they need to grow? OF others, they may see as a hindrance to their studies or their freedoms? Or a family who does not wish to instruct a young child whose mother will not have the maturity or the money to good all? Personally, I am persuaded to say that the viability of the fetus plays an important role in our perception of "living". Thus, one can see women trying to go for abortion even in five months, but when one sees very premature to five months to live, with some effects, but also other normal development, I guess it may change our. Share opinions is good, but to declare a façonagressive is like imposing. Impose, in one way or another, is wrong. Thus, we have to see young girls broken by what they imposed on abortion. Not only for the good of the child who was to come, but for them, that they were immature, but also who should enjoy their youth! Personally, I've seen young girls proper care child, and I will add a first child at 16 or 30 years, is still unknown and doubt. In the end, I think I n'avorterai step, but this is my business and I have nothing to say to those who are for abortion, that is their choice, based on reflections of their own arguments. PS: You once told me that I was an unplanned pregnancy by mistake .. just that even if I am like everyone else, I can not imagine that one day well be alive, I was just a cluster of cells known.

Subject Salam very delicate and oh so complex, opinions differ, but do not think according to his own opinion to the dramas unfolding around the world .. The girl of ten years, a victim of incest, she should keep it if she is pregnant? And even at 14 or 13 or 15? Already the trauma, be still a child yourself and raise a child? No, need to think about that too, and then the other? Think about the weakness of human beings and that none is immune to a mistake, should keep them all? As if there were not enough small children living in large rejected home … And women who are tired, who have much and who can no longer follow? (In countries where they have not much to say .. Is the child to suffer the mistakes of these people …? Abortion is done from time immemorial, this is not a matter of acceptance of from others, but a social phenomenon as old as the world began, and which has already caused quite a premature death because. Estl'erreur Where? She should keep it? At the risk of his health and the rest? Is a right that should remain personal to the person concerned, the opinions of others does not involve the inside, as they say "the counselors are not paying"

If you are cons in your case, it is your business. By cons, if you are cons with regard to other women is that you want to decide what they are right or not do with their bodies in their place! And that decide for the others, is the basic principle of fascism! This is a woman's body in a free country, that's her, her and nobody else!

Hello Samira, J'agrée to your point of view. abortion is murder but will say that to those that it suits them and who are slaves to their passion. They are happy to be alive to cry "freedom" but they would be there if their mother had aborted? And when they have children they think for a moment that this child would he have been as abortion? Trivia: When even women, those advocates of abortion are pregnant and want the child to come, even for only one month of pregnancy must see their joy, they immediately run to ultrasound and take care of them for the baby to come. Is not it hypocritical for people who believe that the embryo is not a life? They care about their embryo already one month of pregnancy and encourage other to get rid of 3 months. A life is a life. She does not lose its value in becaufe not want! Must be responsible when having sex, the company wants accusatory towards these. She does not lose its value in becaufe not want! Must be responsible when having sex, the company wants to accusatory towards cesimmoralités there but the fact is that everyone knows what happens maintained when sex, Sex is not a game, you must be responsible and accept the consequences and recognize our hypocrisy and irresponsibility. There is no accident where everyone is aware of the risks . One drunken attack to justice by establishing their liability in accidents fatal road because they were well aware of the risks associated with driving while intoxicated. Similarly, when killing babies who have sex with awareness of the risks, it's all the same. Freedom for everyone, even for babies who can not see! "Nothing justifies murder, it is our society to find solutions to some sensitive cases. You will find that the crime attracts crime, it is time to consider breaking this vicious circle. Being against abortion does not preclude compassion for those who suffer in a devastating emotional state ….

One thing is to have an opinion, it is a sacred right, something else is to impose it on others. One thing is to have the right to choose, something else is having this forced choice. Have your own opinion does not mean that others must follow them.

I've always been against it but not imagine my galley now, with all the children I had with parishioners, and they also listen to my Preaching the idiots, and now I have lots of small children I ruined every Christmas, and it's not with the salary Benoit gives me that I'll get through. No abortion is wrong but would require a derogation from time to time.

In Islam, it is considered to be alive! Abortion is a crime that is exactly the same thing as killing a person 10 years or 50 years for us Muslims, there is no more serious than killing an innocent man! So whatever happens and any situation (relationship, viola, … etc.) is prohibited! it's just like killing a person! regardless of age (one month or 5 months)! @ Belle Zebute: what you say makes no sense! is a living being! he has the right to live right before her mother to the abortion or not! or because the person is to defend it becomes normal! he can not even defend the poor! is his choice to live before choosing her mother and I do not think a person who has not even begun this life will choose to die! is a crime and whoever did should be tried as a criminal

Yeah you got too Samira because I too am too agree with you it is too rebels both, you must too be the one you are you too and not even let you impress no strangers on the internet and if thee too want to say that Twilight is too good as you got the right too, it's not because you're a teenager you're necessarily totally immature.

I see no harm in being against abortion, in fact I am too. What I see is criticism: – Asserting that position by violence or even murder (some lighted in the United States U.S. in particular), weak and inconsistent position with the assertion of being pro-life. Fortunately they are a small minority factions, but they exist, so it must be pointed out, the more they discredit the cause they claim to defend very good. – In contrast to prohibit speech that those who believe it is a crime (and most atrocious, the victim is totally helpless) on behalf of freedom, which is equally incoherent. I co-sign all of the post repented. There are (even if they have to develop) alternatives. But we must help and support, not judge and condemn those who have done so under generally difficult. Denying the long-term psychological impact of abortion is dangerous for women (and their families) to deny the humanity of an embryo is. Denying the long-term psychological impact of abortion is dangerous for women (and their families); deny the humanity of an embryo esttrès arbitrary (and carries risks of landslide hazard on the fact of deciding who can live or not …) @ Ted, the position of most opponents of abortion is very consistent, whatever you say, since it is based on respect for human life and the equal dignity of all ( that which you defend rightly Hinder racism, but neglecting a way that I just found incoherent with those unborn). @ Ted since you still answer me (thank you): "@ Encouraging people to guard against future disabled children, finding that a girl of 16 years is spoiling the life of a child under the excuse of "it must take" -> The first thing is that there must be 16 years educated to be responsible in the sense not so much that "we must assume its mistakes (made you a kid? You are going to shit is good for you!") but rather, "you're not ready / willing to to a kid? Do what it takes to avoid! "As for disability, it should be more help. I express the wish just qu'onpuisse do otherwise. "All that is NOT based on" respect for human life "and" the equal dignity of all. "Question of definition. Personally, I find it difficult to consider the killing of a baby as respect for human life, and I'm struggling to treat the failure to find that the life of a disabled child it is better to nip it in the "eggs (quite literally) as a sign of the equal dignity of all. You can understand?" It may be difficult thee to accept, but he'll have to get used to them … "Why should I "make me" Yes, I know how society I live, I can do, thank you (and even without nightmares every night). That does not make me love in every aspect . Not to give up to move in a direction that seems best. As anyone or almost, I suppose. "Ted always @ (thank you for having responded yet, having said that I think it will stop there because we will transform the matter under discussion between us which is. Ted always @ (thank you for having responded yet, having said that I think it will stop there because we will turn the matter under discussion between us what n'estpas object): Some points: "If I amused myself by saying "in my case, the earth is flat", I'm not sure it would make it really flat. Well there is none. " No this is not the same. In one case we speak of the earth, objectively measurable physical concept with measures on which it is fairly easy to agree. In the other, we talk about the person, a legal concept (the subject of law) and philosophical, and hence the definition is much, much more debatable. Our philosophical choices lead us to have clearly incompatible designs. And the position of French law is not nearly as simple and "in your sense" that you seem to say. Do not think I am oblivious to the suffering he may have with a disabled child (just for closer, I had an uncle with Down syndrome). I also saw the joy and love that it could carry. I'm not saying this is easy, only that I do not see why they usurp the right to say if it. I'm not saying this is easy, only that I do not see why they usurp the right to say whether or not the blow çavaut as one would buy a thing. Because I think it is a human person as they speak, and that any drift eugenics is intrinsically dangerous. You say that "if the bodies are not finished this is not a person": it seems completely arbitrary and not founded more than say for example "before puberty (not the ability to reproduce, no maturity all organs again!) is not a person. " You doubt that I am not of that opinion. One last note. In terms of law, the 1975 Act is not a _légalisation_ but _dépénalisation_. A shade that has any importance.

I support you in your choice to be against abortion, however, I confess to being troubled in some cases. Such as rape, incest. Not that I find much of the abortion in these cases because it is an innocent who pay. I would simply say that it is God alone to judge these people and not us. Some people are weaker than others or less conscious or surroundings are less enlightened than thou because they can take a decision which does not weigh any weight. Personally I think there are so many couples who seek to have children, rather than an abortion would be best simply to give them the child, it would at least happy.

Hello Samira I'll tell you a story, that one of my former neighbors … She is married, both slowly approaching their thirties, they decide to have a child … she got pregnant, so good They are super happy …. ultrasound, and all the "armada tests during pregnancy etc. … hopefully … She gave birth to a baby boy born before a serious problem … (no trisomy but basically any thing that went awry during cell division … from what they told us, without going into too much detail), undetectable … that child survival estimated at 5 and 10 years … He is unable to care for himself, alongside cleanliness etc … Do not you think if they had known this would have been better for both you … she aborts imagine what raising a child they knew would not live beyond a maximum period of 10 years? During these 10 years, that child will experience a multitude of health problems, you honestly believe that it's fun for him. She is not, for example, which will impose on you the number of children you aurasdans your life right? there is such …

You have every right to be against abortion and say it without blushing. I would go further, it is intolerable that you are considering an abortion against your will, and if we try this, I will support you in your right to keep the child if you wish. But do not worry, in our country, nobody will force you to abort, then fine, breathe …:-)

@ Ted: I attend to the debate exciting, Firstly Sabrina has the right to be against abortion as you are for you. Personally I think it's inhuman, I honestly could not even watch kris's picture. Tell me Ted, you love life? you are happy to teach you, you cultivate and enjoy this life? I say this with all the respect I owe you, but imagine that your mom will have you deprived of that pleasure? Imagine that it's your we would have an abortion? You would probably not of this world in order to discuss with her on this issue. Abortion is a private life being, the embryo is a "potential benefit", although during the early phase of development are there does not yet have a soul, and it is not considered human [It depends for whom, because a lot of people more educated than you, do not share your ideas, but I'm not to say that are wrong and who is right, because everyone has it own vision] Being human potential because it is. May we are in the field of surgery and medicine, I tell thee a citerquelques Abu Al-Qacim (10th century): One of the greatest surgeons of all time. His treatises on surgery included clinical description of instruments he had invented (ophthalmology, gynecology), practice of cauterization. Translated into Europe in the 15th century. Ali Ibn Al-Abbas: While Hippocrates and his followers claim that the child emerges spontaneously from the womb of his mother, he discovers that the contraction of the uterus expels the fetus. He wrote treatises on abscess of the uterus and cervix of the uterus. He gave the world a medical book ever. There was Abu al-Qasim al-Zahravi (Albucasis) [father of modern surgery] Ibn Sina (Avicenna), Ibn Zuhr (Ibn Zuhr), Ali Ibn Rabban Al-Tabari Al-Razi (Rhazes) ………….. The list is long.