Tradition holds us when you are!

Strange … because very contradictory, but indeed I think it is well established traditions in the brains of very exclusive …

Because these people have no sense. Dictate what the idiots want, they want

But is it not equally contradictory to be for abortion and against the death penalty? That is to say, taking the life of an innocent and let it saves a rot. They therefore have no logic, it is the diktat of morons and very closed from what I read above.

Me, no. I am against abortion, and especially against the death penalty.

The reverse is equally troubling and the much more common, most who are against the death penalty for abortion is not a paradox we kill those who are weak, words, fetuses, etc., a human power

You seem to do a lot of fillings in your questions. Other form of prejudice? But a different style Islamists.

not at all certain I am for the death penalty and abortion and am not the only

"Cons" "to" to do a case by case

Bushistes: for the death penalty and against abortion; Commies: against the death penalty and abortion as a right to use in routine Do not touch us here at one of the biggest absurdities produced by our company?

Everything has to be redone, strongly deluge

there is a difference between an adult and a fetus. Consciousness can be? anyway, the death penalty, sometimes I tell myself that it would not be so bad but: 1 / in error can convict an innocent to death, and even 1 / 1000 is unacceptable 2 / seen through the U.S. in particular that it does not prevent crime

It's like Sarko is for immigration and deportation at the same time

You've read when you got drunk? I have absolutely nothing comprendu lol!

Beyond the divide "for / against" etc.., We must see what are the arguments. For the Democrats: – On abortion: An embryo is not a thinking person. This is not a crime to remove a developing being it is not yet a full person capable of thinking. – On the Death Penalty: Justice given by humans is fallible and can not take the risk of killing someone (even if the capital punishment against a heinous crime could be justified). For conservatives: – On abortion: Every life is sacred, there is nothing that has more value. An embryo is a developing being and kill a developing being is a crime. – On the Death Penalty: The nature of the crimes punishable by death justifies taking the risk of killing one (or more) people innocent if it reduces the number of such crimes. I would add, even if life is sacred is God who will sort. I think the Democrats' approach is consistent: They. I think the Democrats' approach is consistent: Ilsne not view the embryo as a whole person, so there is no more crime than abortion for contraception, for example. This does not therefore cons not say the statement about the death penalty condemns the killing of an innocent person. Everything then plays on the notion of "person" can handle 2 questions without cons say. As for Conservatives, they tell us that all life is sacred, even a lifetime in the making, which makes abortion a crime. For cons, the life of a wrongly accused is less important than the safety of the state that sacrificed found to decrease the number of crimes … In this case, actually, I think the two statements are against this and say that this is an absurd argument.

I am more conservative, that is to say pro-life, but we can replace the death penalty by life imprisonment (the real life, not 20 years!).

For these idiots love the life of a murderer than an innocent … point bar …..

you can forget your great ideas between the dictates of biology and sanctified the abortion of 10 weeks maximum, there is a woman being murdered … claim in this case, it borders on animism the "leftists" have defended the right to abortion in a positive way, defending the right of women to have themselves and defending the right of poor women not to end up sterile or downright dead after the illegal gerrymandering, which is not the case for women who have enough money to have an abortion you should also be a little extreme right, right? Normally, they are very committed to the preservation of the bourgeois order by manipulation of the old Christian morality, they are violently anti-people, basically that's why they fail to get a true popular vote is is pragmatic when it comes to treating immigration and crime, it is dogmatic when it comes to dealing with life, except of course when it comes to kill the culprit:

The death penalty I am for, our prisons are full of criminals who kill for pleasure and abortion for women who are raped or other problems of abortion and for Muslims who lay like chickens!

Do you consider masturbation as murder? And oral sex as cannibalism?

hello to abortion when necessary and for euthanasia to shorten the suffering

AHHH, I'm not for abortion or for euthanasia, but I'm not against, I am for freedom of every woman, every poor person, living his own life .. it is the sole master of its existence, and to put an end, even if it belongs first to God .. one who puts an end to life, or his life (kill or be kill or be killed) great dilemma, so I can not judge, I'm not allowed. Good evening!

against any form of donation, death is a sin that goes against the Ten Commandments of God and especially Exodus 20, 13

I do not need to "maturing capital" to get an ethics and morals. I chose to do good for me and for others … not for a reward from God. So deadly sin or not I think we should kill anyone but a fetus capable of spoiling the life of a woman and having spoiled his own too, I think it is good to have an abortion. Sin capital or not, I think that a person for whom life is a needless suffering for years from the right to dignity. And I do not need a specification to dictate arbitrarily to my conscience.

The New Testament says that he who hates his brother is a murderer! Because we can not have in life that allows us to love God and hate: 1 John 3:15 "Whoever hates his brother is a murderer, and you know that no murderer has eternal life abiding in him. "The bar is high for this one / who wants the life that God has for this earth and for eternity. For one / one with the law or religion, the bar is at the resulting requirements. For him / her whose conscience is not completely dehumanized, the bar is equal to what they perceive as right and wrong. For one / one who has been educated / e in no conscience / moral law – which becomes a serious generalization – he / she may be guilty of misconduct for which he / she has received the benchmarks: it often leaves only secular law (civil or criminal ). So far is varied according to what you received. But what is also clear is that ignorance does not exempt the consequences. But what is also clear is that ignorance does not exempt conséquencesfâcheuses or attacks that Satan can add to fair and just judgments interpellators … What matters, therefore, in concrete and related temptations that inevitably result is so opposite to what one knows. And so I think it is also to be light that illuminates the darkness of consciousness, so that others can access a real forgiveness of their sins, to set off against the forces of evil occult, and the perpetuation well understood and accepted their souls … Sincerely

For at least two points for which I am glad not to be religious … I'm for both. Of course, under strict control!