I'm going to see the pediatrician in the week but I just wanted to have different opinions … I'm breastfeeding and I start to give small pots and I alternate with homemade, I have a bird's appetite, but I standby still eating a balanced diet. Her constipation does not seem to interfere as she sleeps really well but I am concerned.

to discuss with the pediatrician the food is to be something but to closely monitor

everything must go in order with jars of vegetables. promote prune apple, orange juice for fiber, avoid carrot. to drink water between meals because there is less bottle, water testing from Hepar, a bottle a day max. Constipated, it does not matter if every other day kk needs less milk may be changing …

First we must know what you mean by "constipated". "After six months, we talk about constipation when a child is less than three bowel movements per week. A saddle is not required daily in children. And in let alone the baby! In fact, few babies constipated! In most cases, the gut of the child is constipated the examination is normal. And the constipation is mild. After 6 months, juice fruit, vegetables, food diversification should enable it … to find a good transit. "Do not forget to give him water to drink, this is the first thing to do.

Glycerin suppositories that will help bcp is waiting to go to the pediatrician

then no SUPO has glycerin for several days of constipation and very rarely. (1 time per month) because c is not good for small test to give a little bulbs prune belly massage ds sense of a needle of a watch and a little Hepar. good luck

No bulb to prune a baby of six months! If you rub her belly and it makes gas, a glycerin suppository to help, perhaps due to the change in diet:) No problem with the suppository, if it is a bit constipated, it will emerge intact, it's a bit like putting a thermometer)

Bois de l'Hépar (not too). If you have begun to diversify, try the stewed apple – prune. But if it not bother …

feminist polemic and paying tribute to his exceptional career. I do not mean the woman but her influence on political figure on a certain vision "French" it has left. I take two examples, without being against the abortion, abortion law does does not drift into other areas, debates on euthanasia are the same. then she did not influence Chirac that it makes repentance behalf of the French people for the Holocaust? (Monsignor Lustiger contributed Pierre Messmer but could be balanced) Certainly we can recognize that fact and their atrocity, but the concept of repentance st linked to religious and France has no state religion and with great I respect say that I too had ancestors killed in battle by 14-18 and deported to concentration camps. Monsignor Lustiger has contributed. Why, for example Edmonde Charles-Roux has it not been accepted the French Academy? the risk of sounding. Why, for example Edmonde Charles-Roux has it not been admitted to the French Academy? Paraîtrepour risk of "a conservative old fart" I appeal to real women and intelligent answer. I see Che impartial and says real women not polemicists, with vision and capable of openness. thank you for your response It is distressing to see that female calves are also arguing with the feelings and experiences and not with a general idea of " a state of things "Montesquieu said" we must change existing laws that trembling hands "makes me think of my grandparents that when General de Gaulle said something that was gospel. Note that some prefer a dictatorship would be a good and even in "educated". They could hide behind an ideology with widespread lack of benchmarks. A modern debate is needed: we must retain the right to vote for women?

I am for everything she has done!

Being against the action of Simone Veil C4EST BE AGAINST THE WOMAN AND I DO NOT THINK YOU AN OLD CONSERVATIVE SOIS

Before the law legalizing abortion, women did their own risk and many have lost their lives and many orphaned, others remained crippled. A midwife has even been guillotined for it in France under Petain. There was no contraception … and there is also the case of rape, child might be born with disabilities … For my first child so I had known risk of being born with a disability … I would have committed suicide with the child to avoid putting the world a more unhappy. For the 2nd, it is likely that I would have done the same thing by bringing in the elder's death, because it's just that love is wanting happiness of her child and I had no confidence in others to take care of my children even in their father. For fathers, the pleasure of a moment and then too often they break and want to know anything … Now I despise those who speak only of the Holocaust deniers of the New Martyr of Gypsies, most likely in men for them. There. There was a double genocide and peoples Gypsies and Jews are united in martyrdom but the 2nd received financial compensation, honors, and over all the others are still discriminated against, I refuse to establish a hierarchy among the victims the life of a gypsy child was as valuable as that of a Jewish child, his "crime" was the same and draw a parallel between abortion and genocide, there is margin. I am all for contraception and not for abortion but in some cases must be resorted to as the Brazilian girl raped by her stepfather and pregnant with twins, for the bishop's corner stepfather should be forgiven but those who had saved the life of 'child pregnant should be excommunicated You're not a "a conservative old fart" you forgot to think it can happen to everyone I am for euthanasia as it is impossible, I will end my days when I estimated that the dependence is close … I can make my mother error exceeded the 96. I can make my mother error exceeded 96ans …

J'adooooore Madame Simone Veil; It is remarkable, everything she did I'm for. I made him a tribute, thank you for your question Coco ……………..

It is unfortunate that abortion is taken for contraception, abortion should be for certain cases. Abortion has been trivialized and s'aplique most often to people not wanting children but forgetting contraceptives. when to the Holocaust, to believe that there were only Jews deported which is totally false. And repentance was not necessary to be even seen atrocities commises.la France is secular and not religious.

it is a great woman, how many women no longer had to have the "abortionist" nothing that's wonderful we can only say thank you

I do not think the abortion law has led to abuses: how was it better to use an abortionist or go abroad to have abortions. What women do not all use this freedom wisely, for sure, because birth control is preferable, but in cases of fetal malformation, rape, teenage pregnancy, high distress, the law is very useful . Chirac was right. The attitude of the French administration and the police have been despicable and too many French Jews have denounced. As Edmond Charles-Roux, this is not an exceptional writer. Why her? Anupam Kher seems to me a better writer or Annie Ernaux, more modern, or Leila or Agota Kristof Sebbar, etc. …

Muslim, secular and feminist .. contradiction Yet there are feminist Christian, Jewish and Muslim practitioners. What makes one believe that the process of liberation and empowerment of women should remain the preserve of militant secularists (not religious)? If the Muslim activists for a party of extreme-left as it denounce sexism, polygamy, forced marriages, campaigning for the right to abortion and supported for best fight, a macho interpretation of their religious texts that they know and proclaim corrupted by tradition, we would may be misguided to dismiss them from office. At least admit that Islam Wahhabi misogynist ultra-Orthodox suits everybody,) We ground layman, even if the struggle for their rights within a community of believers tends to warm our skin anticlerical and anti-dogmatic, religious practice does not become involved in public affairs. Rest veil, yes,. Remains the veil, yes, c'estennuyeux, it shows. Christine Boutin does not ostentatiously large wooden cross around his neck, yet soft as a feminist, a beneficiary of advances that have led militant women in power, she was a member of Parliament and a gouverment then it is affiliated with Opus Dei and fundamentally opposed to the achievements of feminism that his faith and his commitment disapprove (abortion, condoms, etc. ,..). It should not be the only or among politicians in office, or among those who would l 'be hiding under their burqas mental archaeo-Christians are of recommendations and measures to bring the woman to her role as mother and guardian of the home (which is not even the case of "veiled "in question) Not to mention consistent with Trotskyites themselves, not the subject, which is the difference .. and where is the problem, you disappoint me a little, anyway .. Zelda, Morgana, Abuse, Amyliana, year, make a play, Fugenjikko? installing anti-Islamophobic Election. Zelda, Morgana, Abuse, Amyliana, year, make a play, Fugenjikko? installing anti-Islamophobic deBesancenot electioneering, it's heavy, sure, but nobody, really nobody to tell me "that girl is the best head of a party anticapitalist usually disinclined to compromise and full of enthusiasm activist, rather than wallow in your community? "Others talk politics in the republican framework, their moral and religious values without which it is easily decrypted or easily decipherable, so it is forty centimeters of tissue that would make a difference? good. .

The color of her scarf, right?? Ok, I go out …: o)

What now for the Trotskyists "opium of the people"? We would like to know, although they have been an idea ..

in any case to the buzz in the media did not find better

No headscarf is not that a piece of cloth, it is a sign of religion very marked besancenot pretends to defend secularism, it is anti curate see his declarations, he chose to talk, I hope it will do him not happy …………. c is a zero

Religion is the purely private domain. An elected the Republic is supposed to have a neutral appearance. Women can not recognize itself in the person of another who is veiled, it is obvious. In my opinion, the veil is not really a sign of emancipation, and you can intellectualize the debate as much as you want. It is completely free to walk around with a veil, but certainly not in time as representative of the people in a secular republic. Moreover, very few young Magrébin veil. Who will recognize in the person of this woman, I wonder … Finally, the NPA, whose number of members has dropped by 1,000 in year 1, use this girl so instead touted, hoping surely win votes in neighborhoods, increasing slightly over the stigma of the latter. Besancenot has a beautiful ball …

For me, the scarf itself, first as a symbol of submission to the male gaze, totally inconsistent with a claim of feminist equality (or when imposing the veil men) and other is a stigma denoting membership of a religion. I would also be shocked by the nomination of a nun in a cornet or a rabbi to curl.

it is not shocking that a member of a list has a head covering Fusse there a scarf or a voile.Ce is shocking is that the NPA made a front and a dangerous religious overtones.

It is much easier and your reasoning is not logical that those who want to preserve their customs. We are a people with our traditions and our ways of living. We are happy with it and we do not like that they are changed or transformed by other customs that come from elsewhere that we reject and we especially want to impose by force while the majority of citizens do not approve.

See our little debate on this subject with Yin Yang Shu: http://fr.answers.yahoo.com/question/index; _ylt = Amtnozyds5FYhkGd0aGcf4k4Agx.; _ylv = 3? Qid = 20100203121720AAPaUfV There is still a contradiction on the port scarf (a symbol of submission of women) … Muslim feminists are, but how are the piece of cloth religious symbol of machismo? Anyway, we should ask him … Otherwise, Boutin feminist?? This is the best of the year! This woman is a violation of secularism and women's right to her alone … And finally, apart from a stroke as worthy of Sarkozy, what is the NPA? The government debate on the burqa after leaving its debate on national identity turn anti-Islamism primary, NPA us out of his hat showing a candidate's religion! Apart exploit Muslims, the NPA does nothing! Some of Dati said it was "the Arabic service" from the UMP, that the NPA has hers … It's pathetic! Besancenot uses the same method as. It's pathetic! Besancenot uses the same method he says quecelui fight … That would have been too complicated for him and his party to campaign solely on the ideas? If Marx was there, he would break the shit out Besancenot …

The NPA is desperate to raise some votes in Marseille and in the 93. The presence of very ugly scarred rapper whose name I forget was not enough. A veiled woman (enfoulardée) is a woman who prefers his religion, namely, submission to Allah and Islam is not really avant-garde in the struggle of women. You made a comparison with Ch Boutin but fortunately these 2 guys are not the only alternative. These are just the 2 extremes of the same problem.

What shocks me deeply is the small detail which states that the veil is thin "… It peaked there. Anything that can get angry in power is good, even jeopardize secularism. It's really small.

Olivier Besancenot forgot to ABC of Marxism …. Religion is the opium of the people ….. and that the headscarf is a symbol of submission to a religion in whatever she may have more patriarchal and reactionary …… thus the opposite of feminism, in doing so he has to deal a blow to icepick to Leon Trotsky.

Feminists in our countries do not veil, nothing that we see with this crude maneuver to win new supporters. Then we're in a secular country then the NPA goes against the values of our country. @. Fair (e) Play ► ♫ I think exactly like you. Otherwise you're right religion and feminism are not always opposed, for example, Sister Emmanuelle was declared feminist: The nun said she was not "a saint", is described as "vindictive", "angry" and "a bit feminist . The feminist just bothers me, it is feminist or you do not, but I read his book (confession of a nun) and I confirm it was a true feminist. Source: http:// www.lefigaro.fr/actualite-france/2008/10/20/01016-20081020ARTFIG00346-sur-emmanuelle-est-morte-.php

In politics, image is everything. And they know it. It is indeed the problem.

Atheists who are the promotion of a religion which rejects the disbelievers, it falls from the clouds.

Arzal hi! Instinctively, I want to say "Fuck". God does not exist and the republic is secular. Then, on reflection, I've kept my position: "Fuck." As the lady replied to a reporter: "I am not here to talk about religion, but policy. The republic is secular, she knows. Just tell him that God does not exist.

"What makes one believe that the process of liberation and empowerment of women should remain the preserve of militant secularists (not religious)?" I do not think that at all. Secularism is to practice their religion freely in private. This woman is Muslim, but no worries there, it involves religion in politics is one of the things that I blame him. State and religion must remain separate, I would like. In the more use of existing controversies about religion, national identity, and all these things that most troubled of reason once again resurfaced, and again by electoral calculations. And I condemn the allusions displaced religion from which they come. When Sarkozy made his remark about the "moral superiority of the priest from the teacher" or made the sign of the cross before the cameras, it does not honor the secular republic that is supposed to serve. Second thing : perhaps the veil is a symbol. Second thing may be that the veil is not a symboled'opression for this woman, she has not personally been forced to wear it and it was chosen due to its own interpretation of religion. But … is the foremost female politician, the candidate who appears veiled. For many women in France and worldwide is used as a way of bid and indoctrination. Many women are likely large, sometimes their life to be able to wear what they want without being judged. Making policy is to send a message. Perhaps there are other women who paradoxically lead some social activities for women and veil, which will see evidence that the veil is a symbol not fixed, but "what makes" . The idea could defend themselves, but must take account of reality: the veil is a way of oppression against women. In some families, girls are conditioned at puberty or even earlier. It was fortunate to be in a country where, theoretically, we did not face that. What message does this candidate. What message does this candidateenvoie it to these people? He must play down the veil? Precisely not. it can be serious.

nothing shocking about it except their challenge to try to make our country their own. Our governments, by dint of procrastinating and as we go, they will more or less long term to achieve their ends Bise Anne

You cite the example of Christine Boutin. She never called feminist and do not militate in NPA. It is at least consistent with his speech … Everyone knows that appear with a veil (or a cross or a yarmulke) when claims have responsibilities policies is not innocent. "Stop" to veil the face ", the term seems well chosen …

Let's do it very well … the NPA was credited in the previous survey to 4.8% of voting intentions. Today, it is just over 3% … Another few days and it may well disappear!

You say "Muslim, secular and feminist .." I would say: "Muslim, secular, communist and feminist …" I do not understand how a communist list may participate in a religion in its policy, as for memory , according to Karl, the brain is the material that self-consciousness (and also a lot of imagination I would say). Especially as it was in communist countries found the least disparity between rights, employment of women and men. With these irresponsible, radical Islam now has one foot in politics in this country. I call it treason. An attempted solicitation which will eventually sink the party. Because it's like that, I scratched my list of nice people. Voila, it said.

This is purely a provocation and not smart politics.

What shocks me is that we can consider these connasses wearing a headscarf. But what shocks me even more is that prohibiting those connasses to wear a headscarf. But what worse, and what shocks me even more that what shocks me more is that we would use these connasses wearing a headscarf as an electoral argument.

… it must be nice down there … Hair enclosed in a scarf all day, hello fatty! argh !!!!!!!!!!!

personally, the media context. sounds a bit too pub.

The fact simply be manipulated by the NPA