"The embryo or fetus are not potential persons, they are people with great potential" (Dr. Wilkes, President of Right to Life) Fight against abortion shows a retrograde attitude opposed to social progress and which will cons sense of history. … Of course That is why the United States and in countries around the world, politicians, pressed it is true by the electorate, returning to this legislation that have been too much havoc. Being against abortion indicates a lack of tolerance. To be for abortion, it specifically does not allow the embryo. We, we allow everyone, especially the unborn. We do not condemn anyone, and certainly not the weakest. We condemn that abortion and falsehood. How unfortunate shouted: "I was sure this was not a child?" A woman is free of his body. If you want, but the baby too. Freedom for women, death to the baby! This is not a formula. Freedom for women, death to the baby! This is not a formuleacceptable, especially if the baby is female, which gives more rights to have his body …. Abort is that killing a mass of cells, embryo or the fetus, which becomes a living human being and when it is independent and ready to face the outside world, that is to say from birth. First, at the time of his birth, a newborn 's is not autonomous and is not ready to face the outside world. It is totally dependent for several years after the umbilical cord is cut. Become human when he no longer needs his parents? Second, the fetus is alive. His life comes from his parents. At 3 weeks his heart beats. All parents who have had an ultrasound at this stage can testify. An embryo or fetus has not his brain or his heart formed. It is therefore not a human being or a whole person. Human life is transmitted by parents to the first cell and goes until death. Can we honestly. Can that be honnêtementconsidérer possess a human form of life without being a human being? In addition, women seeking post-abortion follow-up know that to reach beyond their pain and rebuild, they will learn to name the lost child. It will be unfortunate. What do you know? You tell desperate imagine that misery. What right do you choose for him? What man will remain if you kill all unhappy? "Killing with kindness! "Is not this hypocrisy? A baby requires a lot of attention and a teenage single mother, penniless and whose family is fragmented or too far away can not raise her child with dignity. It keeps coming on abortions committed due to an insecure social or rape. Either two reasons that can affect the emotional group but which are ultra-minority. The mothers in distress are experiencing painful situations but those who abort their babies without leave but with an additional misfortune to. The mothers in distress are experiencing painful situations but those who abort their babies without leave but with an additional misfortune alues miseries. You must read parliamentary reports published annually on this. What is the reason the majority of statistics on abortion? "Abortion of comfort" (sic)! Because a child can also disrupt the vacation schedules or antagonizing the purchase of the new car … The real problem in our society, its frenzied materialism and loss of sense of values. Abortion is imposed on anyone, it's a freedom of the mother. To each his own principles, to each his beliefs. Abortion is imposed on this poor innocent victim murdered in the womb. Is a prenatal infanticide. It may also be imposed on the father by the mother, or vice versa. No group, and certainly not Catholics have the right to impose its views and to prohibit abortion for everyone. Any individual, let alone a doctor or a parent has the right to impose death on an innocent human being. Even if we banned abortion, women would resort to the law. Even if we banned abortion, women would use it, the loiinterdisant abortion would not be useful. The law prohibits stealing. Yet people continue to steal. Because this law is not respected, should therefore allow the flight, by framing strictly to prevent abuse? Tax evasion is said to be a national sport by high incomes, which creates an injustice to incrementalism in Vietnam to the average taxpayer. We hasten to put France in tax havens? Of course not, this is precisely the por

a great sin

Abortion is legal in France, whether you like it or not. Occupied yourself, then children born into poverty in the war, those who are martyred, those who are abandoned, who are conscripted into armies, girls raped first, and we'll talk after abortion!

Totally agree with SAS S.

I think it is legitimate for a woman to have an abortion if she does not want her unborn child. Better to assume from the outset, rather than to live a childhood of shit to her child …

"The embryo or fetus are not potential persons, they are people with great potential" (Dr. Wilkes, President of Right to Life) Fight against abortion shows a retrograde attitude opposed to social progress and which will cons sense of history. … Of course That is why the United States and in countries around the world, politicians, pressed it is true by the electorate, returning to this legislation that have been too much havoc. Being against abortion indicates a lack of tolerance. To be for abortion, it specifically does not allow the embryo. We, we allow everyone, especially the unborn. We do not condemn anyone, and certainly not the weakest. We condemn that abortion and falsehood. How unfortunate shouted: "I was sure this was not a child?" A woman is free of his body. If you want, but the baby too. Freedom for women, death to the baby! This is not a formula. Freedom for women, death to the baby! This is not a formuleacceptable, especially if the baby is female, which gives more rights to have his body …. Abort is that killing a mass of cells, embryo or the fetus, which becomes a living human being and when it is independent and ready to face the outside world, that is to say from birth. First, at the time of his birth, a newborn 's is not autonomous and is not ready to face the outside world. It is totally dependent for several years after the umbilical cord is cut. Become human when he no longer needs his parents? Second, the fetus is alive. His life comes from his parents. At 3 weeks his heart beats. All parents who have had an ultrasound at this stage can testify. An embryo or fetus has not his brain or his heart formed. It is therefore not a human being or a whole person. Human life is transmitted by parents to the first cell and goes until death. Can we honestly. Can that be honnêtementconsidérer possess a human form of life without being a human being? In addition, women seeking post-abortion follow-up know that to reach beyond their pain and rebuild, they will learn to name the lost child. It will be unfortunate. What do you know? You tell desperate imagine that misery. What right do you choose for him? What man will remain if you kill all unhappy? "Killing with kindness! "Is not this hypocrisy? A baby requires a lot of attention and a teenage single mother, penniless and whose family is fragmented or too far away can not raise her child with dignity. It keeps coming on abortions committed due to an insecure social or rape. Either two reasons that can affect the emotional group but which are ultra-minority. The mothers in distress are experiencing painful situations but those who abort their babies without leave but with an additional misfortune to. The mothers in distress are experiencing painful situations but those who abort their babies without leave but with an additional misfortune alues miseries. You must read parliamentary reports published annually on this. What is the reason the majority of statistics on abortion? "Abortion of comfort" (sic)! Because a child can also disrupt the vacation schedules or antagonizing the purchase of the new car … The real problem in our society, its frenzied materialism and loss of sense of values. Abortion is imposed on anyone, it's a freedom of the mother. To each his own principles, to each his beliefs. Abortion is imposed on this poor innocent victim murdered in the womb. Is a prenatal infanticide. It may also be imposed on the father by the mother, or vice versa. No group, and certainly not Catholics have the right to impose its views and to prohibit abortion for everyone. Any individual, let alone a doctor or a parent has the right to impose death on an innocent human being. Even if we banned abortion, women would resort to the law. Even if we banned abortion, women would use it, the loiinterdisant abortion would not be useful. The law prohibits stealing. Yet people continue to steal. Because this law is not respected, should therefore allow the flight, by framing strictly to prevent abuse? Tax evasion is said to be a national sport by high incomes, which creates an injustice to incrementalism in Vietnam to the average taxpayer. We hasten to put France in tax havens? Of course not, this is precisely the por

These same brave American Knights … cons of abortion are the first in the name of that same right to involve the death penalty even without evidence … show me the difference, eh? I'm not saying that's good, I've never had an abortion, but I'm for abortion rights … give birth to an unwanted child is far more negative about a lot of people! The best thing is to educate young girls to reduce the recourse to abortion … it is never a means of contraception, because in fact it is not one it's also traumatic for the woman who aborts know it! But it was his legitimate right to the wife! " Also …… you know it or not gentlemen, since the dawn of time women, whatever the reasons …. want to derail the bottom …. and has been since prehistoric times … keep you close your eyes Gentlemen Take for example the Chinese example … killing girls at birth seems to me far more terrible than abortion to be an effective. killing girls at birth seems to me far more terrible than abortion to be a effectivementpotentiel … but what are the choices women inalienable!

hello, me personally I found AC atrocious as rape, murder of an innocent, slavery and many other things.

Haram KATL nafss

"The embryo or fetus are not potential persons, they are people with great potential" (Dr. Wilkes, President of Right to Life) Fight against abortion shows a retrograde attitude opposed to social progress and which will cons sense of history. … Of course That is why the United States and in countries around the world, politicians, pressed it is true by the electorate, returning to this legislation that have been too much havoc. Being against abortion indicates a lack of tolerance. To be for abortion, it specifically does not allow the embryo. We, we allow everyone, especially the unborn. We do not condemn anyone, and certainly not the weakest. We condemn that abortion and falsehood. How unfortunate shouted: "I was sure this was not a child?" A woman is free of his body. If you want, but the baby too. Freedom for women, death to the baby! This is not a formula. Freedom for women, death to the baby! This is not a formuleacceptable, especially if the baby is female, which gives more rights to have his body …. Abort is that killing a mass of cells, embryo or the fetus, which becomes a living human being and when it is independent and ready to face the outside world, that is to say from birth. First, at the time of his birth, a newborn 's is not autonomous and is not ready to face the outside world. It is totally dependent for several years after the umbilical cord is cut. Become human when he no longer needs his parents? Second, the fetus is alive. His life comes from his parents. At 3 weeks his heart beats. All parents who have had an ultrasound at this stage can testify. An embryo or fetus has not his brain or his heart formed. It is therefore not a human being or a whole person. Human life is transmitted by parents to the first cell and goes until death. Can we honestly. Can that be honnêtementconsidérer possess a human form of life without being a human being? In addition, women seeking post-abortion follow-up know that to reach beyond their pain and rebuild, they will learn to name the lost child. It will be unfortunate. What do you know? You tell desperate imagine that misery. What right do you choose for him? What man will remain if you kill all unhappy? "Killing with kindness! "Is not this hypocrisy? A baby requires a lot of attention and a teenage single mother, penniless and whose family is fragmented or too far away can not raise her child with dignity. It keeps coming on abortions committed due to an insecure social or rape. Either two reasons that can affect the emotional group but which are ultra-minority. The mothers in distress are experiencing painful situations but those who abort their babies without leave but with an additional misfortune to. The mothers in distress are experiencing painful situations but those who abort their babies without leave but with an additional misfortune alues miseries. You must read parliamentary reports published annually on this. What is the reason the majority of statistics on abortion? "Abortion of comfort" (sic)! Because a child can also disrupt the vacation schedules or antagonizing the purchase of the new car … The real problem in our society, its frenzied materialism and loss of sense of values. Abortion is imposed on anyone, it's a freedom of the mother. To each his own principles, to each his beliefs. Abortion is imposed on this poor innocent victim murdered in the womb. Is a prenatal infanticide. It may also be imposed on the father by the mother, or vice versa. No group, and certainly not Catholics have the right to impose its views and to prohibit abortion for everyone. Any individual, let alone a doctor or a parent has the right to impose death on an innocent human being. Even if we banned abortion, women would resort to the law. Even if we banned abortion, women would use it, the loiinterdisant abortion would not be useful. The law prohibits stealing. Yet people continue to steal. Because this law is not respected, should therefore allow the flight, by framing strictly to prevent abuse? Tax evasion is said to be a national sport by high incomes, which creates an injustice to incrementalism in Vietnam to the average taxpayer. We hasten to put France in tax havens? Of course not, this is precisely the por

I could not try those cons have done if they were not doing their joy they have their reason of course there are the pill IUD condoms ec .. to protect those who have abortions because they forget their means of contraception I think they are abusing

if we follow your reasoning a pregnant woman who accidentally falls and loses the baby, is accused of infanticide involuntary???

It's a great question you ask us here. Each women has her opinion the above. For my part, I think it's horrible to have an abortion. Falling pregnant and giving birth is the most beautiful thing. How many women do not get pregnant while others have abortions … Then there are abortions "involuntary" for women expecting a baby with Down syndrome or have other disabilities, and who for the good of everyone decides not to keep, there is the couple decides. Otherwise, yes I do not understand people who have abortions because they did not protect c … ' ragant is not I tell you !!!!! with all means that there are now more dvrait it happen. Well some women can do nothing about getting pregnant in contraceptive happen. Finally (I'm not) but I'm wondering: what is better? Abortion or put her child in the world and life regnier???

NEVER I will not judge a woman who aborts. I'm not in his head, and I do not live his life. Everyone makes choices and must live. N'avorterais I ever but I would fight for that right still exists.

Women fought to make abortion equal to spare women from dying in the hands of forcing them ivg is a choice we should respect him but he should not be a means of contraception, so it must out condoms! (think AIDS is also most severe) and the pill should be covered out

I would add nothing to what I ka amelia said sui cons but individual and free choice of c own!

It's very concerning each person in each case. Personally I n'avorterais not known but jai friends who are passing by and I always respect their choice. In his position protection was really appropriate .. and she was very young and she felt unable to be around to support a child. I'm pregnant right now and I know How far it is wonderful .. But I can not say the same for someone else. I'm not all women!

I personally think your brain is sick, it looks like a pit purrain there with you like a smell that I do not. I will always be on your way to spread your manure and turn them into flowers. You cache tell us you're against abortion and I am for every woman facing as they see fit and keep the freedom to make a choice that does not concern you

it was a long time ….. began to fail me such questions ….

from the layer I have not had my rules, I breastfeed my daughter for six months exclusively, and yesterday I got to do with my husband without taking any precaution, I'm afraid of getting pregnant, this is not the moment my daughter is still small,

yes it is possible

Yes, you sleep with your husband without protection, you're not sure that breastfeeding is a contraceptive but you do not want to get pregnant …. is that right eh ….?!!! So you playing with fire, it burns méfis you!

Normally, breastfeeding is supposed to prevent pregnancy, but it is not happening always like that! It is better to protect themselves to avoid just to add a second child.

yes

Hello, Many say that to breastfeed blocks ovulation, but other Obstetricians gynécos and we always recommend to pay attention anyway, and resuming contraception after the return of menses. If you are afraid of falling pregnant again, do not take risks and take precautions. Is more prudent.

Take an appointment with your gynecologist who will prescribe a pill suitable and compatible with breastfeeding. or condoms because then yes you can get pregnant while breastfeeding.

Yes you can!

everything is possible, you should consult your gynecologist for peace of mind

Yes, of course, it can block ovulation but it is not systematic … It is a means of contraception less reliable (with the withdrawal method …).

yes it is possible

@ Angie said it all! Breastfeeding is not a contraceptive to know! If you say your daughter is still young, so take the initiative to protect you not to give her a little brother or sister not god!

Oh yes it is possible

Yes, I have not checked the figures, but my midwife told me that there was a risk of 5%. It's not much, but it exists.

Kikou, I just gave birth to my second daughter and I breastfeed! You can actually fall pregnant while breastfeeding! So the next time take your precautions! Kisses

yes there is a risk, you must guard your precautions, especially after 6 months, your body really had time to recover from pregnancy

Yes, unless you want plenty of other small cats.

It is best to check with a vet. You should know that the pill causes cancer pussy

Not by cons, ask at what point your veterinarian, you could make sterilization to avoid having to reach. Health level, it has everything to gain and your wallet too;)

Especially not the pill is a real shit (later increased risk of cancer and short-term metritis or pyometra putting his life at risk). The best thing is to be sterilized when young will be about 6 weeks and even if it was in early gestation.

As REGINE B, among others, because they are fast ….

No pill (birth control, I think you mean it) during lactation. And in general, do not give a pill to a cat (or dog) but the sterilization. The pills are measured in a standardized and frequently cause ovarian or breast cancer. You let him finish his breast and you sterilize it will be much better for his health and further, sterilization will cost less than to give him the pill throughout his life.

bonjour voila I always explain breastfeeding my son for 18 months and from the left motherhood I am in cerazette but now 3 weeks since I have nausea, sore nipples and I'm afraid of being pregnant is that possible even with my pill, knowing that the 18 months since I had once my period to 15 months of my son thank you for all that you can help me and if I am pregnant I am afraid to tell my husband thank you for your answers but we have already 3 children and we do not want 4 th That's why I took the pills

I wish you courage and patience to live with a man you're afraid to announce a future pregnancy. There are many who would be at 5 cm from the ground …

Already: no contraception is 100% reliable! Then, at worst the 2nd, did you do well with your husband? So what are you afraid? This is not your fault, indeed it is the fault of anyone! Following is a decision to turn 2, you keep it or not. And then you do not take the lead like that, you n 're not even on you! Go, Zen, breathe, maybe you're not pregnant and if thou art thou hast not done alone. byby

Not sure you're pregnant, your breasts may have tired of being nibbles a child with teeth … Otherwise, pregnancy is not impossible, and if so, your man should know, if the angry is that he is not very attentive, takes two to get there … Unless you already knew that he did not want other … Anyway, you can not hide him, but before pinball, check your sources, and if you're in the right, then that is silly, but you did more than take your courage both hands to tell him … Go, courage, it is still not a monster your guy;)!

I even got pregnant 6 months after my birth, breastfeeding and were under cérazette. pill to take ultra fixed hours! will do a test, good luck for the future.

microphones pills are not necessarily appropriate at this stage of your breast. secondly the fact that you had your period means that once you've got your back layers. So you can get pregnant. good for two things: either you have gastroenteritis dragging right now or you're pregnant. go see your doctor and talk to him (at worst he will prescribe a check for feet.

Unless you're sober (which is still a great pity), the risk is not zero. There is therefore a non-zero risk that you may be pregnant, but it can be anything, the worst in Benin (Benin is probably elsewhere;))! This lasted for three weeks, it is necessary that you consulta, even if only to relieve yourself physically (and morally)). Also, if you really are pregnant (I take this assumption into account, this does not mean that it is more likely), better know as you still have the choice after the pregnancy, right? Otherwise, why are you "afraid" to tell your husband? That neither you nor he want to have a 4th child, and that you fear the outcome of a pregnancy test, that everyone can understand, but why be afraid of him? He is as responsible as you not? And it's unfortunate that you can not you stand over him.

I had my back to bed and I have to take a contraceptive, but I heard that the pill decreases the amount of milk is this true or not? I breastfeed my daughter at 6 months and a half I should choose another method of contraception?

request your genico this more cautious

there is a special pill for women who want breast-fed her child should not take any pills while breastfeeding consult your gyneco a site that you can certainly learn http://www.contraceptions.org/

I was prescribed Cerazette as I took 3 weeks after my cesarean and I nursed 10 months and a half. There are only 2 pills that allow breastfeeding, but it does disturb in any way. Otherwise I think you can put an implant.

Yes, this happens in some mothers … But you can not know before trying. All methods of hormonal contraception (pill, IUD with hormones, implants, rings, …) are likely to cause a decrease in lactation. By cons, everything without hormone (copper IUD, condoms, spermicides, diaphragm, …) has no impact on breastfeeding. To you to see what suits you best. You can always try the pill and stop if you notice a change in your milk. If it goes wrong for some moms, for others there is no problem. Bonne continuation!