Alongside these new measures of valuation and protection of the family, we commit ourselves to ask the French, by referendum at the end of five years, to promote a modern nation concerned about respecting human dignity by writing in the texts , who base their existence and development, the sanctity of life and affirmation of the human right to be legally protected from conception to natural death. Be legally protected from conception to natural death?? And what about abortion and euthanasia? Jean-Philippe http://www.frontnational.com/?page_id=1116 A: Exactly, I inquire. Speaking of "sanctity of life from conception" it means what it means. 49.3 A King: 15000 miners annually. It's huge, I agree. But what should we do? Leave all these little girls at birth because they did not have the means or the lucidity to take contraceptives? Pawn A: Of course, when Marine said something to believe, right?. But what should we do? Leave all these little girls at birth because they did not have the means or the lucidity to take contraceptives? Pawn A: Of course, when Marine said something to believe, right? Anyway, there is not a concern to do, she will never pass. I just wanted to open a few eyes of lovers of Marine who drink his words and do not even want to read his program.

I'm for abortion. And I think the moms should have Zantiracistes practice more often!

Your boyfriend would vote Le Pen, however … http://fr.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110308113842AAmnb5B

No anti-abortion from the FN. The Front is a realistic, which is that the number of abortions has remained stable, but the number of abortions performed on minors is increasing. The Front National simply demonstrates that no alternative is proposed against abortion. While many married couples can adopt, without an administration without logic, have automatically give abortion without even thinking if we can borrow another solution .. In no case had been talk of abolishment of abortion, which would be ridiculous, but to propose alternatives in office opportunities. Listen! Learn properly! Take Action! MARINE2012!

At the end of quinquénat because Navy wants to promote family and ESPECIALLY provide alternatives to abortion because women are only too often, abandoned or even rejected. If this works politicals they get to put an end to 200 000 children killed each year, humanity will have taken a big step. This is an ambitious because of population aging and low birth in France. As you can see it impose anything ety propose a referendum. You are against popular democracy?

Being against the death penalty, I have a little trouble on abortion. In any case, I fully recognize the right to abortion. I'm just scared of abortion statistics: the vast majority (I have the exact%) occurs due to the abscence of means of contraception …

We read the same thing, but thou hast that are still able to deny the obvious … Note that the phrase is deliberately convoluted in order to precisely interpret …

@ King: on the contrary, 75% of women who have abortions each year are contraceptives. What is abhérent instead is to note that while more women taking the pill 9 out of 10 admit one or more omissions in the previous 6 months, it remains the method of contraception almost systematically offered at first, then there are many that are better suited for women who forget to take it (especially the IUD, which is still denied by the majority of nulliparous gynécos, when nothing indicates its use-cons! )

He can always wrap it in beautiful paper, abortion is forbidden because "protecting life from conception …" it's the same thing in more light. The irony of restoring the death penalty. Very logical and soon it all that? http://www.leparisien.fr/international/usa-le-dakota-veut-excuser-le-meurtre-des-medecins-pratiquants-l-ivg-16-02-2011-1318391.php

it is true that this is a concession to the Catholic party, their values are and should be respected but nothing will be done outside a popular referendum, the FN is the party of France and French, such a decision can not be taken against the advice of the Nation. So no questioning of the right to abortion without a referendum, but admit that this issue is very minor in France in 2011 crippled by debt, unemployment and crime. If you prefer to vote for crooks and traitors for the reason that there will be no referendum on abortion is that you do not really live the life of the vast majority of French

Following the responses referring to the fact that this is not a baby, and there is no conscience, one may ask: What is the difference between abortion and murder of an adult "not conscious "asleep or unconscious? in both cases the victim "is not conscious." but does that justify murder?

I think not as they die … Einstein @ can not be a baby but still a human being alive … And … @ Kowai you know that? Evidence to the contrary? Although in the minds of proponents of the culture of death that. If I burn my hand I want you to prove you wrong … But you want one? Doctors have said previously abortionists. We kill the baby in the womb of his mother made desperate efforts to escape the deadly vacuum … @ Boudou you're to be pitied. A pregnant woman says she is expecting a baby … the heart beats at 3 weeks …

? What baby? At this stage it is called a fetus, not a baby.

It is an embryo before 12 weeks and it did not even realize what is happening. Demeter proves me wrong.

Issue-oriented or not ….. FYI, women abort an embryo that is to say the outline of a human being who is far from the constitution of a baby so caution in appellation given that you do not mind ……

At the time of abortion, human embryo that looks suspiciously like chicken! The baby does after birth!

What is the difference between abortion and murder of an adult "not aware" asleep or unconscious? I want to say out of context question, since there is someone who sleeps up completely so that when a woman aborts, she miscarried a baby but not an embryo! Ie at this stage there is no sensation possible. There's not even the cells which detect cold hot node, the pain of comfort, etc … And I am absolutely against the term "murder" when talking about abortion. We must get into their heads that when a woman aborts is not for fun, okay? Then, if she took this decision is that somewhere it is also best for the child. Why make the world a being who is not expected and therefore may suffer all his life when he has nothing to do? (And sometimes, the mother also has nothing to do). Abortion to save lives (ironically), this I am sure and it's still a great achievement for the Status of Women.

LOL!

oh no it's not dangerous … but if you want to redo thee butcher's guts, it's a good idea not to take birth control … (It annoys me, but it annoys the irresponsible)

actually it is very dangerous because you have sex does not only sets a new design (pregnant again) but there are risks of infectious diseases so watch out if you want your health

This is not dangerous but totally irresponsible. It is still not that hard to take a contraceptive, especially since it is a choice .. However abortion is not one. Even if you can not keep a baby that you do not want, this does not prevent you from nab disease. We still live in a society where it is readily available means of contraception. Before sleeping with anyone, anytime, you would have done better to go to school to learn to write.

I read you saying "once it did not suffice him" …

poor idiot who does not understand life

well yes … Moreover, it is risky at any time ….

unprotected? seriously? You tfais abortion and you do that again unprotected sex? Y'as something wrong with you?

An abortion is not nothing! It's become a life as you stop. Obviously for you it was not an accident but the bullshit! I hate you?

Dangerous I do not know, rather unconscious, right?

dangerous not so irresponsible. Abortion is not contraception!!

Troll

After abortion or not, Having unprotected sex is ALWAYS IRRESPONSIBLE AND SOMEWHAT DANGEROUS!

yes, because you risk having a baby troll … or otherwise, you'll have an abortion again, and this can make you sterile, and you can not have babies anymore trolls.

Dangerous in what sense? Being pregnant, having a child (something wonderful): that's the danger? It was not the same concept of danger, but if that's the danger for you: yes, you're in danger! That's okay, it will only the second time that precede the next time and so on … What unconsciousness! What crap! Next time think a bit (if you can, if it's something you can do)!

By the suction method and salt to burn the fetus, I could not be a practicing physician … I do not ask you whether you are for or against abortion, read the question! To all those who m'invectivent, I am sorry to have offended. My question was specific and does not require to decide for or against! I wanted to "facilitate" a topic that seems worthy of discussion. It seems to me that this is not by concealing the fact that face forward. Maybe if young people are aware of what abortion, it will be even more careful in their relationships and their antics. I say "young people", including de facto boys … Too easy to put everything on the back of the girl …

Yes, but not true, only in videos on youtube. Look closely, you can find. It's not pretty pretty nor very interesting. Me I came across it by chance while watching videos with babies … alive.

I saw it on a video like you tube "is not pretty. Sensitive soul refrain from watching videos like that because it marks forever.

I've never seen and I do not want to see! What is it to watch horrors? To believe that we do not see enough each day …

The medicine goes into barbarism. I had never heard of anything but the idea turns me stomach! And I do not answer the question "for or against abortion" …

And then? You think doctors do not see the worst? For instance, one man ripped, tumors or limbs torn off? Your question implies that you're still against abortion neither more nor less.

Have you seen the result of a car accident? Everyone does not have the "guts" to be a doctor or firefighter. That "amateurs" of such images would delight as they want there in abundance on You Tube and others. But pity they stop trying to impose them on us. Because frankly it's not shock people who advanced the shmilblick we know.

View video of mothers who kill their newborns should not it be nice-nice … Physicians see the horrors every day, abortion is one of them …

Abortion is a personal choice! and is legal in France! despite what the old and old is frustrated right! and you did nothing wrong over the guilt or even moms often in great distress which this painful act! and I'm not talking about taking Greluche abortion to contraception! but the majoritee who need this the way! then your criticism or sordid details keep them to yourself!

No, the better

Every Thursday, we get the curettage of the Week (4 hospitals) … the first time is hard but you know what you paid, what you should do so it's not really a problem, but it ' is like the rest, qd thee a breast or a jaw on your table or perform an autopsy is not always pretty …. it's just part of the job

but I have not lived a cons heart because the heart was stopped BB or cause birth because my daughter was dead it is a moral shock that physically I am doing some research on the internet here is the explanation of aspiration and burned by the salt: techniques used Curettage: A cutting instrument is inserted into the uterus to remove the child from the womb. This procedure cuts the child into pieces and tear of the uterus! Aspiration: This is the most common method for abortions to 10 weeks. The cervix is dilated, then using a vacuum ten times more powerful than a regular vacuum, the child is literally shredded, crushed and sucked. His body is more than a shapeless mass. The pieces are collected in a jar connected to the cannula. The injection of salt: This abortion method is undoubtedly the most barbaric of all. It is used after the 16th week when there is enough amniotic fluid around the. It is used after the 16th week when there is enough amniotic fluid around dubébé. It removes a certain amount of this fluid and replaced by an equivalent amount of highly concentrated saline solution. The baby swallows this fluid, which will then cause him many hours of extremely violent convulsions that will burn bright Under this method abortions injection of salt, the mother is under anesthesia because the embryo would this torture suffer too, and she resent very strongly the movement of her child dying. Within 24 hours, it will expel a dead baby whose skin is completely charred. ps I've had no choice by curettage cons salt I had never heard of and read what they do I find too barbaric!

Have you ever seen women die with knitting needles in your stomach or anything else that could cause bleeding and infection when they did not want it? It was our grandmothers and our mothers.

atheist or believer, man does good, volunteered, did the charity … atheist or believer, man can hurt especially if he is also pushing an ideology by the Vatican before the modern era has waged war, promoted the antisemitism, scientific censorship, kill the apostates and heretics and other … al modern times, the Vatican supports his pope, works of charity and a speech on family planning, the abortion, sexuality that s opposite to that of practitioners, experts, … The Vatican promotes a simplistic view of sexuality and asked his priests to stifle any sex scandal without going through the police, under pain of excommunication (c finally was true a few years ago, today less in countries where the press is organized) the current Pope, the author of these rules, nya seen no problems up to what the media and secular organizations do quite a racket the church can still boast the slightest moral advance when it is packed with many problems?

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xbsqlj_babylone_webcam

In general, I noticed that the Vatican is quite traditionalist American Protestantism where a few steps ahead. This probably traditionalism that generates some of its problems and its inability to solve them. It will take however it finds a path to a configuration more suitable to modern society. Having said this traditionalism seems to avoid some fundamentalist religious sectarianism or maintaining separation from secular society in which it is "submitted" and that it does not "submit".

Have you ever forced a woman to abort! and why?

No ^ ^

Bah no! lol

it will not be accepted? " Certainly not. I am opposed in principle to the murder of children in the womb. I do understand that in a very small number of cases: health reasons, defects, etc. … But compelling?? I'm not Cheb Mammi is the worst form of violence against a woman, even worse than rape.

@ Sonnen, if I may, I would have to be a man not to find rape as the most abominable acts …

While we have yet found anything better than abortion to practice eugenics under the guise of humanism (malformed children, genetic defects, the mother of poverty, etc. …). Question a little provocative, but deserves consideration on its merits. @ Jay Casimir Where do you see an opposition? On the contrary, they complement. @ Jay Casimir You're confusing eugenics and neonaticide. One example: why do we see less and less with DS in our societies? Just because the medicine can detect this genetic abnormality before birth, and indeed they are aborted. This is called an abortion therapeuthic. Question: who is this therapeuthic? Not for the fetus, since it does not live! For the human race then? If this is not eugenics that, what is it? @ Francis The idea came from the Malthusian, I think. @ Sonnen There is no time limitation for IMG. And I know that despite their disabilities disability are happy to live. A fetus with a disability is as innocent as a fetus that is. A fetus with a disability is as innocent as a fetus n'estpas disabled. No? The abortion because it is believed that his disability is a burden on society, it is eugenics. No?

I do not know anyone who is serious for both eugenics and cons of abortion. These are the results of two opposing doctrines, in my opinion. @ Al: Being in eugenics, that killed at birth. Being against abortion is saying yes to life. Incompatibility, I think.

The man and his paradoxes …

Excellent question, thank you. For my part I am not for eugenics, but for abortion THE SOLE DISCRETION OF CONCERNED (not a social problem but an individual problem), in extreme cases such as rape, risk of death for Mom, trisomy or other serious risk to the baby. I am opposed to abortion in other cases. We have enough means of contraception in order to manage a priori the birth rate. @ Sonnen, tests are performed on the 3rd month for trisomy … and abortion can be performed.

Can. We can do everything. Like, for example, be against abortion on a right to life of an embryo (and human life is sacred, even in pregnancy) but advocate the death penalty. And for good human beings this time.

The ideology of extreme right opened the eradication of naturally disadvantaged people "especially for health reasons" in World War II shows! And just after the war the abuser of women has been institutionalized. Instead of aborting women why not castrate men! if only medically

I'm actually in this case: Currently abortion is primarily for reasons of convenience: parents do not feel how to accommodate an additional child, single mother and not for eugenic reasons. If it detects a case of trisomy in the 6th month of pregnancy, not miscarried. Many orphan diseases are detected too late for an abortion. Now I'm sorry, but a healthy child can live a happy life with adoptive parents. It should rather refer mothers who do not take care of a child to abandonment. In contrast, children with disabilities, especially in the case of multiple disability or mental disability will be miserable all their lives and will load all their lives for their parents and society. I am not opposed to the coup de grace when he was the only decent solution … @ Almire: A serial killer is a noxious: the felling is to save his future victims. By contrast a baby is a totally innocent man who has committed no crime to deserve the death that you want it. By contrast a baby is a totally innocent man who has committed no crime to deserve the death that you want luiinfliger. I notice the illogic of the supporters of the killing of babies that are to safeguard the lives of murderers @ AL: quite, I said initially I am in favor of eugenics, but not to abortion reasons of personal convenience or financial. What is the most common case today. I would add that it depends on the disability. If we can sail, we can offer him a life about right, but I'm talking multiple disabilities: http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polyhandicap there is more generous to offer her a quick death.

And those against the 2? I do. Against abortion (not tell me of abortions in rape cases this represents only 2% of abortions) and against any form of eugenics. However I am for IMG in case of severe disabilities. In the kind that would prevent the person from having his own life. But not because he is a dwarf or something lightweight. I know a specific example.

Funny as a question …. For me it is not inherently paradoxical, but it depends what is meant by eugenics. It seemed that eugenics was the desire to create the best possible beings. But when I talk about creating the best things I mean manipulating the embryo from the 1st stages of development into a perfect being has his taste. This is in no way opposed to abortion. For we may well wish to manipulate the embryo offspring as the desire, without resorting to abortion if this operation should fail, right?

Because sometimes the mother is too young so she too can not handle the baby, but instead of an abortion can be put in the freezer too like that the baby is too criohygieniser and mom has too much time and grow like that when she has too work too and can take care of the baby she is too much in the microwave (be careful too not to thawing and after cooking if it is a mess).

The freezes it leaves traces, better go to the Seine and attached to the baby swing. Neither seen nor known

That was a joke! Not funny.

Dummy! C You're not even funny HACA!

But one does not see the other!

I personally am not against abortion but it is a bit trivialized and show the truth to the students is a step towards allowing a lucid awareness and knowledge about the thing. Abortion is killing a living being, do not take it lightly!

Because he did not want to indoctrinate students with his own ideas.

videos shown to students must be shocking! and hurt the sensibilities of some students! despite that these videos will reveal a strict truth he did not intend to disclose it without authorization from his superiors! hello everyone!

I aborted Tuesday, judge me please … I have a pretty hard life .. and I know when I do I can not bleed quesment its just my cramp if I slept with my boyfriend in my fds are you of the danger he arrrive dkoi jdevrais you wait or not my roughly how long after I have sexual relationship. ft. I know my body yer sensitive

Given the confusion of the matter … it may be worth more? Ouch, how to think about it after an abortion? Already it is necessary to recover physically and psychologically may be, unless it was wanted of you? "Next time tell him to fuck his hood o) And good luck, not the time to depress either!

Tell him to go through the back door if you are pressed.

Truce of baloney!

If he can not go through the door he goes through the window.

It was not until about 2 to 3 weeks! For more information go see this website: http://forum.doctissimo.fr/grossesse-bebe/ivg/relation-sexuelle-sujet_150586_1.htm

Must wait 45 years … Seriously you think about it already … I dream! Put a condom and the pill at least this time!

What youth! When I think of the evil that the girls are given for the right to contraception …. it really fucks the drone to see this level of stupidity.