I am neither for nor against …. There are certain circumstances that it is better that a woman become a mother at some point, be it a question of age or refusal to be a mother

I am "for" the fact respect the choice of women without judging them and I am voting for the issue of abortion. The debate has no interest and questions even hides a moral foundation. Throughout history, women have failed in one way or another. Legalizing abortion is used to prevent abortion is a carnage. So the question is it: one is for the law authorizing abortion or abortion at all? The woman decides, I think. This is attached to the freedom she has to have his own body. So I do not see what the debate should still take place on this.

when one takes action must be assumer.si you and I have come to the world why not let autres.la majority of those who have abortions regret it later in life

I am against.

This is not to be, but having the choice and opportunity to do so in extreme cases it is the freedom of women. I can not thank enough Madame Simone Veil, to fight it led, insults she endured, to have the opportunity today to be free about it

I am against abortion its criminal

Never to have seen happen to the emergency room on Friday or Saturday night women "tringlées" by who knows who, bloodless, feverish, sometimes half-dead – by hemorrhage or sepsis, so I'm for prevention. Termination of pregnancy under medical supervision is beneficial in that. But alas … unfortunately for some it is a contraceptive, negligence, forgetfulness, or laziness. We do not reduce the number of pregnancy terminations as birth control pills available, reimbursement for most family planning and supports teenagers who request them.

I have 4 months of pregnancy and since I was enseinte pain in my lower abdomen and Daux I'm afraid that is a sign of abortion??

and your doctor, he thinks what?? because I assume that as a very responsible woman, you were see a doctor as soon as you had this concern

go to the emergency of motherhood, call your gyneco

Go see! When you are pregnant must not hesitate.

How to understand Exodus 21:22,23: "If men fight, they actually encounter a pregnant woman and her children out, but without a fatal accident, it is imperative to impose a compensation according to the owner of the woman will require it, and he will give it through the judges. But if a fatal accident, then you must give soul for soul,

I'm sure God approves of abortion of the child of the devil.

Abortion is possible before 40 days of life of the fetus. Aude 40 days then the soul is breathed into the fetus and abortion is prohibited.

- Religious wars, in the eyes of God, is it legal or is it murder? – When god God asks Abraham (legend I reassure you) to kill his son, is it legal or is it a murder by proxy in the eyes of the applicant (god)? – When God gives Cain kill Abel, is it legal or is it a murder in the eyes of god?

Hi! If it's an accident, an accident and no one is responsible for an accident. But abortion is never an accident, it is a voluntary act (abortion: Abortion). And if it is voluntary, it is murder … – "There will be in your country or one miscarrying or barren. I will fulfill the number of thy days. "(Exodus 23:26). … Because God has commanded! Amen.

Bonsoir Fatal accident is said twice in these two verses. abortion, crime Oh how consent can not be an accident, a crime of murder clearly intended and desired, the mother wanted for X reason (sometimes called by the parent) do not bother to give life without giving up sex. sexual intercourse was made and intended by the Lord God between a man and a woman consecrated by God (who is the inventor of marriage, Genesis 2:24 Ephesians 5:31) 8:13 p.m. Do not murder. is a commandment of God's law Jacques 2 2:10 For whoever keeps the whole law and yet stumbles against one, he is guilty of all. 2:11 For he who said, Thou shalt not commit adultery, said also, Thou shalt not kill. But if you do not commit adultery but do commit murder, you have become a transgressor of the law. crime is to kill a living being with the desire to intentionally kill him. even babies are considered viable because it would have no abortion. babies are considered viable as well, for without abortion auraientnormalement he lived. This takes us back a little massacre of the innocents Herod decreed that the demon to kill the newborn Christ, fortunately without success. The accident is rather seen in the case of an unwanted abortion by the mother

What is abortion? Abortion is the expulsion of an embryo or a fetus, under normal conditions, is not viable outside the womb Jehovah He sees an embryo as a human being? "For you knit me (…) you in the womb .(…) Your eyes saw my embryo, and were written in your book all its parts, in terms of days when they were trained and where there was not one of them. " (Psaumes139 :13-16) He who Jehovah is the origin of life (Acts 17:28), the life of a child in the early stages of its development, just after the design has a very large value, so a pregnant woman who was knocked should be compensated and if there was death of the fetus so it was the Mosaic law which came into effect "soul to soul" (Deuteronomy 19:21), a life been removed, another life had to compensate the loss put an end voluntarily (no miscarriage or accident) in the life of a fetus. '(Psaumes139 :13-16) He who Jehovah is the source of human life (Acts 17:28), the life of a child in the early stages of its development, just after the design has a great value, so a pregnant woman who was knocked should be compensated and if there were fetal death so it was the Mosaic law which came into effect "soul to soul" (Deuteronomy 19:21), a life was taken away, another life had to compensate the loss Ending voluntarily (no miscarriage or accident) to the life of a fœtusest considered by the God of the Bible as a murder ..

Is not women decide? or rather, each woman? By what right a man can decide his ban? as rightists in the 70s? Is not that disgusting?

Whatever the opinions of others.

You still have to explain to young women that abortion is NOT a contraceptive. Abortion is a traumatic operation and should be practiced only as a last resort and especially without delay.

This is obviously not up to him. But see the case he dreams of being a father … but yes it does exist, it will try to persuade his girlfriend, we understand that. Once I do an abortion or abortion was a crime we were talking about abortionist … this time not so long ago and people still consider it a crime and would like to impose their beliefs on others .. Besides few services do hospitals and many are going abroad.

Precisely because they are men ………. And machismo still reigns almost by atavism! So it is for or against the woman who is master of his stomach and should remain in any case a man must decide for us! and those who are backward and cons are suffering from acute obscurantism! PS not that right-wingers of the 70s sorry! The MLF had its militant leftists v bcp as we say today "! PS2 and I'll remember it the right to vote that made the abortion law to free Ms. Veil and Giscard who tremendously supported! "I like that does not distort the facts or history

I think that man should not impose its decision. But the woman either. If the "father" wants to keep the child, is his right, and I find it disgusting on the part of the girl have an abortion anyway. Conversely, if the "mother" wants to keep her unborn child is just as disgusting on the part of man to force her to abort. It must be a mutual decision. Aty, be less aggressive, you might think you want to exclude men of any decision "because they are just men." Is ambiguous, be careful. Moreover, whether or not your point of view, we must consult the man and woman in this kind of decision. Now, ethically speaking, it is also a right. A man would not have the right to condemn this practice, but if a woman? If this man is disgusted by abortion, it is his opinion, point bar. Same thing for a woman. As is their right to believe in God or not. After, we must know the difference between defending his point of view, and impose his point of view …

really?? they do have the right to have an opinion on the pretext that they are men?? and can be put aside a certain Mary there is a little more than 2010 years to a woman is pregnant must be a man.

it is for the woman should return the decision to abort or not, anyway, the desire for children that are living in two. but ultimately that is the body of the woman and her child that it 's act. that is difficult enough in this question if we add more moral judgments that is hell.

J have given birth a month ago and I have never hungry, I don t have any nausea but I m just not hungry strives to take at least one full meal a day for breastfeeding j c is what is already happened to some one? it starts am concerned about them

I either I did not end early. you are so tired, busy physically and mentally because it Ponder way into our small head of a young mother is trying to reorganize our homes to find time for everything, and to crown a bit of baby blues, inevitably No appetite ' is not always by appointment .. once you'll be a little more "posed" but you certainly will find it takes time for everything to be put in place ..

ca m is also happens when I've had my daughter, I ate because I eat too j breastfeeding him, because I was drinking c bcp bcp important.j've lost pounds during breastfeeding, but everything is back to normal after the allaitement.J breastfeeding have a year and a half my daughter, and c was tired, I've almost had a depression.Peut be that we will win for you for a few months, has continued to strive to eat and drink bcp.

I like you …. Too tired, chopped offset by nights, and no time to sit down to enjoy a real meal. So, I lived on my reservations, and I was breastfeeding too! But do not worry, it will come back. Take iron, such as during your pregnancy, and eat what you want, even several times. I found my appetite for two months baby, when she made her night, I slept better, and I began to see the day! The bright side is that you recover faster line!

… you're shocked or not? In fact, I'm still my daughter who just turned 7 months. Not all day, just 3 feedings per day on average, to fall asleep for naps and at night, and morning awakening. I only ask this very practical: one starts two weeks in Sicily this summer, and I keep saying that breastfeeding may reduce the logistics, right? I know the past six months, some babies are breastfed, and I also know in advance that I will have thoughts of my family … What do you think? @ Chtonck: Like you, it has been natural from the first moment … In fact, I already cut, since I exclusively breastfed until her 5 months. For me as for her is a pleasure shared, but I do not want to endure unpleasant reflections, which are for my baby and me. My idea was to wean the way back from Sicily, it will have just 10 months. In retrospect, it's been great for a breastfed baby … @ Mamzelle: You've got it. When I was pregnant, I thought if I breastfeed. When I was pregnant, I thought if j'yarrivais breastfeed. It happened so naturally to her birth, I continued, without getting pressure over time. Today she is 7 months, and we love to find like that, especially in the morning, nap and dinner. It is a moment just for us. And yes, I have a twinge of regret when I think about weaning. Thank you for your answers. I will continue to do as I please. If I had not heard, I would never have breastfed, I would have left her crying at night to "do his lungs," I should have stuck to the nursery to his two months, and full Other things I do not feel me.

age is roughly where my boys are weaned himself as great, and it suited me. Of course, there had to "suffer" reactions family "but you're going to breastfeed when ????" "Ben, I wean them before they go do their military service … or perhaps on the eve of their wedding night, why?" it's me "shocked" no, it's not the right word … say that it seems strange to see a child who walks to breastfeed … For me, there is nursing a baby, outside, a walking child is no longer a baby, in my imagination … I have not breastfeed because "it was good," not because the who decided he needed to, but because I am a mammal, and I instinctively ran … and I imagine that the lionesses and / or louvers do not extend beyond the breastfeeding period "baby" of their young, they the "convent" and nourish the time it takes, then they become self I have somewhat the same mindset

it does not shock me, everyone does as he wants. moreover, the cost is more convenient, so do not hesitate. after, this is "weird" when the baby becomes more independent and therefore less baby, but I think it's mainly due to lack usual addition: I meant "for the spot," Freudian slip;)

My daughter is 10 months old today and is still breastfed. It is therefore clear that it does not shock me to see a 9 month old breastfed. For the family, I had no particular reflection outside my grandmother told me "T'allaites yet? But you're mad? Well, after all, it's your body and your baby you do what you want ". If you have any thoughts, shows the economics of breastfeeding (more than 20 € box of milk, do you have make, savings in 9 months). That is a very "earthy" but one who works best facing the anti-long feedings. "Logistically, no bottles, no water, no heater bib find full ride … It's clear that it relieves!

normally since he didn't your baby reaches 12 months you can continue breastfeeding him there is no richer in vitamins than milk from his mother and protects it from any disease if you can continue breastfeeding is well but if you decide to stop it as well because it goes to 07 months he started to eat.

Whether or not it offends others, it is not their problem. It is your choice and your relationship with your daughter. We should not bear the thought of your family, but rather ask them keep their thoughts to themselves and let you raise your daughter as you want (more or less depending on the person diplomacy and your mood). There is one thing to say is you mom, you decide when to wean your daughter! if she does not decide for you …

Madam, it is unnecessary shame to breastfeed a baby of 7 months. Today, medicine has realized the rewarding properties of breastfeeding, which is the best food for babies! WHO encourages breastfeeding until 2 years, many doctors recommend up to 12 months, so you may notice that in both cases, it is advisable to breastfeed as long as possible. I am a mom-and support you!

I'm still my spitz, it is 11 months. But it does more than head at night and morning for several months now, so that nobody sees me do. I never talk about breastfeeding with my entourage, I've taken enough of reflections in the mouth. If asked, I tell the truth, but we do ask myself almost never …. To believe that it is unimaginable to be nursing a baby of that age. When people have the misfortune to have me thoughts, I send them a walk, Yen tired! If you want to breastfeed, continues, do not stop because you're afraid of what people will think or say. And I am ure that if you give him a bottle, the yen will have at least one to tell you: "ha you not breastfeed …"

I breastfeed my daughter who will be 2 years in a few days. Yes, it's great practice. When we went to Morocco this summer, she was cured in two days of heavy diarrhea due to change of food and she was 13 months. This has not to bother the shot for food the rest of the stay. Practice also to sleep at night. The reflections of the family, you do not care, your daughter always comes first. The WHO recommends breastfeeding until 22 months of age and exclusively up to 6 months. The good thinking that you say it's time to switch to growing up milk, you ask them to pay you the bottles of milk for growth, then we produce milk free of growth, milk that fits children and much better still. In many countries, breastfeeding is done during the first 2 years of life of children. I think it's in the Nordic countries that begins diversification than 9 months of the child. Finally, I do not know exactly in which country, but I read that somewhere.. I find it easier instead to breastfeed beyond 6 months that the first 6 months. Indeed, the first 6 months, breastfeeding is difficult to implement. It was only later that everything runs smoothly, then what standard would need to stop after a fierce battle to keep it for six months and when it works best? In addition, the older the child, the more he understands the need to wait, you can not breastfeed anywhere, anyhow, so it can not breastfeed in front of fools. @ Siam: 100% agree with you. lol A few months ago, I phoned one of my cousins who approach their sixties. And while chatting, I told him that my daughter still head. She said: "Encore!" exclaiming, I expected a reflection of the style will have to stop thinking "and not bin. She said: "Ah, well, comment me, I sucked up my 3 years, I liked it" with a touch of nostalgia in her voice. O)

There is nothing more natural than to breastfeed her child until he is no longer wanted (if he eats something else of course, eh …), contrary to what you may say a bunch of shrinks to two bullets, fierce feminist, or other heirs of the bottle … You do well as you want it, if you want to continue to breastfeed, do not deprive most of the happiness and the health benefit! And no, 10 months is not "great" … It's still a baby … until at least 3 years: yeah, what is the age to which manufacturers of infant formula milk recommended giving special children … There's no reason not to follow the same logic with breast milk!

It does not shock me at all because I breastfed my daughter 21 months. Frankly, I do not see where the problem is, anyway, in France, when t'allaites more than 3 months is considered odd (and, paradoxically, a mother who does not breastfeed at birth that is not seen too much …). My partner was supporting me and other people's opinions m'indifférait completely.

my mother made us all breastfeeding for about 2 years. it seems that it's good for the baby's health.

You want to continue to breastfeed, do it. Never mind what e think your family or anyone else.

my baby is 15month and tjrs breastfeed than within! and I intend to continue until I have longer than milk! )

It depends on what perspective you get seats. When my daughter was born, I did not believe that breastfeeding a toddler walking. I breastfed her, was both loved it. And then the days have passed, it will be 3 years old and still head. At the time, breastfeeding 9 months it seemed huge, crazy. Today it just seems completely normal to breastfeed "yet" her 9-month. It is not great for a breastfed baby, on the contrary, it is very small for me … Today, babies breastfed longer than 6 months, there are more and more. What shocks me by cons is to forego that pleasure shared and benefactor just to avoid any comments, remarks because although it has done, whether on breastfeeding, the age of diversification, the selection nursery / nanny / house brand of stroller, choosing shoes, etc. … As you say so, it only affects you and your baby. And then, at worst, if you do not feel prepared to assume no one has to know that you are breastfeeding. And then, at worst, if you do not feel prepared to assume no one has to know that you allaitesencore. And the other way? Do you continue to breastfeed while you just do not want just to avoid having to bear the unpleasant thoughts of an entourage that advocated breastfeeding? Never mind that breastfeeding 2 days or 3 years, the key is to enjoy the game and everyone is benefiting, as baby mama. Weans if you feel like you. Weans if your daughter wants. Weans do not because the others want or because "it's done." I'm wrong or you feel that your words and you have absolutely no desire to wean and you are looking for excuses to continue a little longer. Frankly logistics when we share in Sicily … There are baby formula and water bottles as easily as in France and 3 bibs that takes up no space. It's a bogus excuse! At us you can tell! ^ ^ Seriously, just listen to your heart with Mom, you sèvres or not. To have no regrets, in one way or another, you do what you want, not what others would like you to do.

It does not shock me, my daughter took in up to 10 months and a half and I did not care much for remarks that could make me. It was she who refused the breast abruptly if I continued to breastfeed with pleasure. I got to: "what? You still breastfeeding?" and saw the look I threw it stopped me bathe with it lol. If it's your choice to continue and that your smart mind, well pleased with you not take the head.

I breastfed my son until 9 months, morning and evening, and he ate purees, sauces and dairy products for lunch and snack! there is no deadline for breastfeeding! so enjoy

I have a question that you look stupid that came to my comments by talking with a visitor. So now, my question is a legal standpoint, of course, I was wondering if a father was "banned" his wife to abort. That is to say that in the eyes of the law, only the opinion of the woman counts and if the father does not want the abortion, he can not help it if his wife has decided otherwise. Y is there a section, a case that justifies this? (Sorry, the question looks really stupid, but it challenged me and I not be vague) Thanks for your answer in a way that meets my question. But I noticed that you have misread. I did not speak in the sense that a man wanted to force a woman to abort, but the opposite! For example, if a man insists that child, and not the woman who miscarry in this case. I guess you answer me anyway. Except to answer a message, yes it may seem like an inequality, but it's not just. Except to answer a message, yes it may seem like an inequality, but there is no quedas perverse women seeking child support, each case, each situation is different, so I walked over there not. Inequality me, I see not really but it's true I find it sad that a man can not have children if his wife decided to abort. But at the same time, it is the woman who "supports" the maternity for 9 months, and must continue to take care after birth. Would that justify the fact that the right to abort or not belong exclusively to women, right? So yes, I said I was just giving my opinion and would not enter into the details of the debate. Anyway, thank you all your answers enlighten me:) In addition, they were fast.

This is not a stupid question. No I have no knowledge in law so I no nothing but affirm it seems to me that the law gives women the freedom to dispose of their bodies … and therefore that a man can not compel a woman to abort in France … at least. I leave to others the task of Internet reverse s what I say they are wrong …

Abortion is seen as the woman's right to dispose of his body (the fetus has no legal existence, a part of the female body), so the father has nothing to say .. . It has also created an inequality between gender: a woman can abort, while a father has no way to deny paternity. If it does not recognize the child he did not desire, the mother may still force the recognition and payment of child support (see the case of a lawyer ordered to pay … maintenance for the child product of a "one night stand", conceived in drunkenness after a night …). This inequality inevitably lead to cases of forced abortions or even homicides … just a woman "forgot" her pill and intentionally pam, it can extort money from a man … whereas otherwise, if the man makes getting pregnant, she can "remove" the trespasser without asking his advice to anyone. It is amazing that such blatant dyssymétrie between the sexes emerged when all. It is surprising that dyssymétrie blatant gender has appeared as toutest done to neutralize the difference between sexes. Women have a higher degree of sexual freedom that men do not. Another paradox: while the parents have nothing to say if their daughter aged over 16 wants an abortion, the elderly have the right to challenge the anonymous childbirth of their daughter for custody of their little son … Basically, a teenager has the right to remove her baby, but a responsible adult has no right to give birth anonymously to avoid her death. We walk on the head … Another paradox of the French law: Cheb Mami and his accomplices were sentenced to forced abortion and sentenced ridiculous when you consider what they have inflicted on the victim. To force an abortion, they abused him have inflicted great pain by penetrating with sharp metal objects. If a rapist had committed similar acts on a non-pregnant women to torture, he would have taken 20 years in prison. There, the same gestures, as part of a forced abortion, become less. There, the same gestures, as part of a forced abortion, become moinsgraves, and the heaviest sentence was 6 years. Conclusion: it is less severe torture and penetrate a woman when she is pregnant and wants to kill her baby. If after that the French system is not moth brain …

As part of an abortion, no one is considered relative, since there are no children. The fetus is not a child. So no parents. This is the woman who has her body and has the right to abortion. No man, whatever his relationship with the woman has a right to the body of a woman.

I breastfeed my son for 04 months and I have a fairly significant hair loss, I wanted to know if the serum gingham pass into the milk or not when its use

Anti hair loss of gingham? In Vichy, from May 45, had a tendency to mow, no?

If I'm not mistaken, these are bulbs to put on the head. So no re risks. But if you have to swallow something else, talk to your doctor.

If it is a drug, always ask the pharmacist before taking any treatment. Vichy is the cosmetics, so no worries.

Hair loss after delivery is repaired anyway and you alone wasting your money by using an anti-fall, which anyway does not cross almost the scalp and has no chance in a thousand to grow hair on your little baby, any more than you otherwise. You can even breastfeed in applying the lotion, so you will not waste time.

It will have 6 months to 30, I breastfeed exclusively for this birth, he initially had trouble making the breasts so I get my milk and give him a bottle without any problems, even when I had appointments and that stay with my husband he was taking a bottle. I started diversifying food and he soon took a spoon, sometimes when I put it too liquid in the bottle is more convenient. There I begin to introduce the second age milk (for personal reason I want to stop breastfeeding) 1 bib we put a little drop and that he took no worries, the next day we made a bib of 90 he took it without problem too, except that since yesterday he refuses to take any the bib, hungry after a stroke is no longer hungry. 6 months ago to the peak of this growth is that?

Should not mess about, at 6 months, I uncapped my beers already own.

to be honest, the question was first a physician or your pediatrician … many doctors think they are here, and I think we do not play with the health of a baby

The best thing to do, I think he is not to shine: he has associated with a milk bottle he does not (yet), and now he has tasted it, it does not yet appreciated enough to drink regularly. You can make him take another container (cup or other drink with straw) to habituate more slowly, regularly and offer him chances to accept it eventually. In the meantime, you can bet on other dairy products like yogurt and co. But for many foods, and even well beyond six months, children can enjoy a day and another sulk.

may be not what he likes milk?! or so after having to eat it does not want to try earlier fruit juice or water

He may be teething? When babies are ill they often refuse to eat …

My daughter 6months sulked a bit its bottles, so the doctor advised me to keep it in the morning and evening and at noon it's little pot of vegetables and a dessert (small smooth nature of Nestle) and such a 16h danone since it takes more bottles at noon and 16h must include a dairy product, and now she has never been so drunk the bib in the evening and the morning and take it one more night! After each baby is different so request advice from your doctor I think he will be best placed to advise you.

Hello. How to choose bottles and teats? I intend to breastfeed, but hey, we do not know what the future is made. For a newborn, how many ml is needed? I heard about the bysphenol. How to be sure not to buy those bottles that contain? About the nipple, it seems that there is a carcinogenic texture (silicone rubber or I do not know.) Is there any new nipples to do? In short, tell me what you know! Thanks!

Good evening, my daughter bought in pharmacy bottles that I find very good. http://www.dodie.fr/produit-biberons-le-biberon-initiation, 2 Guaranteed without BPA, I found the perfect .. They completely dismantled, perfect for sterilization … she breastfed and they are ideal for babies who breastfeed in .. for small additions that have been set aside, etc. … then the transition to formula if you do. I do not advertise, but now I think she chose well. For doses, if you are breastfeeding this will demand … it will take what it needs. Bottle feeding, your pediatrician will tell you … and early motherhood advice will help you get started.

I took for my two MAM Dodds enfatns without bysphenol and anti-collic. I took 4 large and 2 small.

In the end, it will be the baby who will choose! I have Nuby, they love them but I can not find it convenient because they sink to the level of the bottle which is composed of two pieces of silicone that should fit …. it does not hold tight … I have several pairs of friends who use tipee Tomy and are very happy.

Hello, I too used the "Dodie" mentioned above for my first child: the only drawback is that the plastic bottle at the bottom of flexible wear relatively quickly and suddenly the life of the bottle is limited. Those I bought then (Advent) are much stronger, I still use them for my second child (I bought some 4 years ago!) Http://biberonavent.fr/biberon-avent/biberon- Advent-ergonomic-Newborn / Today there are models without BPA. I also know followers of glass bottles, personally if I had bought for my children there were many breaks!

Hello yes we no longer know where to head … I bought glass bottles when they were small (because the bisphenol is mixed with milk when it is heated …) rubber teat for my son and silicone nipple for my daughter … because one can not stand each other etc.. And greater when they want to drink alone I bought plastic baby bottles shatterproof ss bisphenol is marked above.

I do not think there have still bottle with bysphénol market. I bought her Nuk bottles at the very beginning he did not like too much, then he prefers Doodie Mom (he's 7months and I use those still there). take many newborn teats that are anti-colic, it helps! later, it will tell you that baby if the bib and pacifier you bought him suits him or not, they always have the last words the little angels;)

In Germany, 98% ¨ breastfeeding women. This means that the probability that a woman has no milk (an argument often advanced in France) is almost zero. 2) for ml: is it that the sheep have a watch and a balance? A baby knows better than parents that the books and doctors, how much milk he needs. And the advantage of breastfeeding is that the baby needs more milk the mother produces more, it is balanced naturally. Not to mention the practical benefits: anytime, anywhere, if the baby is hungry, just give him the breast, it's ready. 3) a breastfed baby is almost never sick. Ask yourself why doctors breastfeeding up to 3 or 4 years. 4) psychological benefits for the baby and mother. No bottle can replace the body contact. When I see how France is anti-breastfeeding, it makes me nuts! One is the country least lactating THE WORLD. (And the reasons are historical: during the First World War, women were. (And the reasons are historical: during the First World War, women étémobilisées in factories, and the bottle was presented as patriotic and was provided with all the virtues. Add to this the French normative bias, "a Baby needs to drink so much at such a frequency, grow so many grams per day, "and you have the explanation). Conclusion: do not ask questions of materials and quantities, do not listen to those who never breastfed, and therefore do not know whereof they speak, and you will not regret a single moment!

What kind of world that bottles …. I am a childminder and I know that each person has his mark. There are nipple-like shape of the breast of the mother (nuke and Advent). if you do not want bisphenol takes glass bottles, anyway, it is prohibited now in plastic bottles. Wary now when even some stores childcare is old inventory and do not hesitate to sell them. If there is no BPA is specified on the label. we also know that glass bottles are not sterilized in the microwave. Information before you purchase a product and if you want to sterilize baby's bibs.

I had Dodds. It was good … except the bottom of the bottle anti colic who screwed so badly, let in all the milk … must therefore be careful. Otherwise, I use Advent: no problem. Solid, without B., easily handled by me or baby. For nipples, bb has never wanted anything other than silicone. She refused and then the other bottles that I could give him.