This morning I fell on France 5 issue kindergarten.'s guest was Elizabeth Badinter. another guest said breastfeeding her child was natural and Elizabeth Badinter replied that what was natural was not necessarily good. faut'il breastfeed or not? I am a man and all my excess. thank you to all mothers who meet
Breastfeeding is the best, is shown http://vivian.noel.free.fr/allait/mythes.htm If Ms. Badinter will spin the crap to drink to his children, his problem was
I'm not! I think that artificial milks are sufficiently adapted and reviewed to provide the necessary vitamins! ps I have 4 children to artificial milk are in good shape
It does not "need" to breastfeed. Breastfeeding is a choice. I breastfed my first, second and breastfeeding I am convinced of the benefits of breastfeeding (not to mention the fact that it costs nothing – that milk is always available and good temperature). Some women do not breastfeed because they do not feel the urge (or because for some it can be painful), there's nothing to blame, the key being to feed the child as the milk by the affection you give him. And then the bottle also allows the father to participate in these small moments of happiness.
oh yes I saw it too and it amazes me every time I hear his speech on breastfeeding! the child needs milk, mom's milk for her baby, it seems logical that a woman breastfeeds her offspring has finally, she dares to criticize those who bring pressure to not breastfeeding, but she must see what it sends a lactating! that misconceptions and prejudices two balls … of course breastfeeding is well and good for the child! however there is no real answer to your question "should I breastfeed or not ?. this is nothing but an obligation remains a choice.
It's a personal choice of each woman. And both sides have valid arguments. And both sides, we see healthy children and other less healthy. So each choice must be respected. Personally, I hope to breastfeed my baby. But I do not judge women who choose artificial feeding.
Personally I breastfed my son for over a year and a half now and I think it goes well, he n'attrappe no disease resists even the flu and when he catches it not long been visits the doctor twice a year maximum, it is true that it is difficult especially when a worker, it is a sacrifice we must make for the sake of the baby, it s just enough ' organize and have patience (it certainly will not breastfeed for life!), think about the future of her child, the disease we see today and that even the small no exception, has we wonder why we see little illnesses we saw in the older ones? with food today that lack of nutritional values that answer I must think seriously: Breastfeeding = eternal health, at least the first 6 months of birth.
Breastfeeding is a choice as choosing to give artificial milk to her child. Ms. Badinter had better keep his mouth shut and let everyone have free will. I nursed 10 months and a half by choice, my daughter was born premature in great shape, rarely sick and I do not regret anything. My nieces were fed bottle, they were full of colds, bronchitis, tonsillitis and so on. Even if now they are in good shape, I find that my daughter despite its "fragility" has not had as many diseases and antibiosis. Is breastfeeding is at stake? Maybe. In any case I do not understand why Ms. Badinter makes debate on something that concerns only the mother.
Elizabeth Badinter is an intelligent woman, but I'm surprised his remarks about breastfeeding. Everyone does as he pleases, I personally think that breastfeeding is good for the baby and for mom. This
Should breastfeed or not? At each decision, each person is unique and master of his body. Regarding the issue of "nursery" must know that the moderator is pro-bib, hence the choice of this particular guest who In my opinion, speaks only for herself. As to "not necessarily good" regarding milk for infants and babies, studies unanimously agree that breastmilk is the best there is. the claim "not necessarily good" therefore has no medical basis, however. This value judgments to which each right answer or not, according to his desire to breastfeed or not. For the rest, it seems pointless to blame the mothers do not breastfeed and take lactating for women undergoing and abusive mothers.
Elizabeth Badinter believes that breastfeeding is the slave for the mother and the infant formula liberate women. Personally, I consider myself not as a slave: it was I who made the choice to: — not go broke bibs and milk powder – do not have to be loaded like a mule when I went for a walk – do not have to find a hot spot for heating bibs – do not have to break my head on the extent milk powder overnight, just one breast to go out and hop to the table … but everyone sees noon to his door. What is natural is not necessarily good … It is a good one!
Breastfeeding is good for sure but what it does not tell us all is that it is always possible or easy … for me it was hell for 3 weeks my daughter has lost weight and my zest for life and love my daughter, I had bruises on her breasts and they were bleeding, a brief torture that the midwife pro breastfeeding reproached me … it made me feel guilty for wanting to stop, but finally I ' I took my own decision and happiness returned my daughter has gained weight and my second I did not even try … it does not tell us everything!!
Breastfeeding is the best thing we can give a child. breast milk is best suited to your child. Elizabeth, machinery must not be very talented … I breastfeed for 14 months … and my baby is healthier than my first baby bottle …
The dear Ms. Badinter is much debate. Note that this is a sixty-eighters feminist who fought hard for equality. But now we go back a little of everything here and I think she was one step behind. There is evidence that breastfeeding is beneficial to the baby. The milk is perfectly suited, evolves according to the growth and needs of children, produces little waste (in the baby's body and the planet for that matter) is always available, and also provides antibody baby. The WHO recommends breastfeeding for other economic and environmental reasons as above. Of course, baby formula made much progress and are also healthy children. Batinder Ms. defends the idea that breastfeeding is an alienation for women. Most breastfeeding mothers who hang out here will tell you otherwise, it is a happiness and fulfillment can send it to your child. I nursed 5 weeks, I had not. I nursed 5 weeks, I had pasmal difficulties which forced me to stop, but I never considered breastfeeding as an alienation … Of course there are constraints. But in the formula too: it costs an arm and an eye (up to 20 euros a box that lasts 5 days), wash bottles, heat, carrying a lot of material … Breastmilk is always available hot, nothing to be transported … To more directly answer your question: should breastfeed or not? The only real answer is: you must do as one wants. If one has no desire to breastfeed, do not force it, because there is every chance that it does not work … If one wants to do, then you gotta go …
Breastfeeding is a personal choice that only looks at the mom. Not to debate on a matter so personal, it's really ridiculous! I'm not totally watched the show but hey I've ever seen interviewed. * The mother wants to breastfeed her baby? And so much the better, it proved that breast milk is best because it contains everything a baby needs. It must be advised about breastfeeding as there are many misconceptions about it. * The mother did not want to breastfeed for reasons of its own? And then? There are good artificial milk today and infants receive as much love their mother even if it did not go. By cons I agree with her when she said it must exonerate moms who do not breastfeed or do not wish to have a child. But there has to understand that we are slaves, because that is nursing her baby and the woman "regressing" somehow want to be too close to her baby (at-home mom, breastfeeding long scarf. But there has to understand that we are slaves, because that is nursing her baby and the woman "regressing" somehow want to be too close to her baby (at-home mom, breastfeeding long scarf deportage, .. .) I find it shocking. Everyone does what he wants and nothing has been re-tell it.
When I see all the thumbs down that reaped the mothers not to breastfeed is beyond me. I'm not Mom, but I think each should respect the choice of another, that choice is breastfeeding or breastfeeding "artificial." A mother who does not breastfeed is not necessarily a bad mother and a mother who breastfeeds is not necessarily a perfect mother (there is no mothers perfect the way). Mothers who do not breast are often criticized, but they may be good reason to breastfeed their baby bottle (baby not sucking at birth, very severe breast pain, milk too low quantity and so on). When I have children I do not know what breastfeeding (natural or artificial) I choose because I do not know if I can give him the breast, but whatever my choice I always respect the choices of other mothers what it is, what few mothers are visible here.
The benefits of breastfeeding protection against infection, hypoallergenic. Breast milk has many advantages. Not to mention the special relationship that breastfeeding creates between mother and child. See also our records: Allergies: other treatments Breastfeeding in peace Skin allergy virtues of breastfeeding Benefits of breastfeeding protection against infections, hypoallergenic. Breast milk has many advantages. Not to mention the special relationship that breastfeeding creates between mother and child. Advertising If bottle seems more practical, breastfeeding has many advantages. Review details. Children stronger has long been known that breastfed infants are more resistant to infections (gastroenteritis, ear infections, etc..) Than others. Several immunological mechanisms and nonimmunologic preclude microbial growth in milk. Immunoglobulins are proteins. Immunoglobulins are protéinesdouées an anti-infectious: it was found in breast milk a large number of specific antibodies (immunoglobulin secretory IgA, IgG and IgM) compensating for their lack transitional level of intestinal cells of the new baby and infant. These antibodies are directed against staphylococci, streptococci, pneumococci, etc.. They are obviously related with infections against which the mother has been vaccinated (polio, tetanus …) or has voluntarily immunized. Their action is purely local in the intestine. Intact immune cells (B and T lymphocytes, macrophages, leukocytes) are found in milk and factors stimulating immunity (nucleotides). Non-immunological factors are also present: lactoferrin, lactoperoxidase, lysozyme, antiviral factors, enzymes (lipases), similar receptor trapping pathogenic bacteria, growth factors (EGF), etc.. Lactoferrin inhibits the growth of several microorganisms, exerts a bactericidal action on. Lactoferrin inhibits the growth of several microorganisms, exerts a bactericidal surcertains germs and fixed iron essential for bacterial growth. Immunological This device is coupled with a biological device. The products of digestion of human milk are characterized by high lactose, low protein concentration and low phosphorus content. This explains the one hand the speed of intestinal transit and also the importance of acidic residues in the colon. Such an acid medium has a bacteriostatic effect on gram-negative organisms and promotes growth of Lactobacillus bifidus. Human milk contains a protein called alpha-lactalbumin, which would be a potent antitumor agent. Protection against allergies allergy preventive effects of breast-feeding in populations at risk have been demonstrated by several authors. Breastfeeding seemed protective in cases of atopic family history provided they do not diversify too early infant feeding and in particular to avoid the introduction of eggs and fish before the age of 9. Breastfeeding seemed protective in cases of atopic family history provided they do not diversify too early infant feeding and in particular to avoid the introduction of eggs and fish before the age of 9mois. The protective effect or rather suspension of mother's milk on a possible allergic condition of the baby (atopic dermatitis, eczema, digestive disorders) also depends on the diet of lactating women. The latter should indeed remove her feeding a number of foods (milk, fish, eggs, citrus fruits, peanuts …) for the effects in children are significant. The difficulty in demonstrating the protective effect of breastfeeding indicates that it is in itself alone, sufficient to prevent subsequent events Allergy, allergens other than those of formula, even the allergenic food, may be involved in the occurrence thereof. To many, it would be unrealistic to try to prevent asthma, allergic rhinitis or eczema, only by dietary manipulation, whereas the newborn and infants are subjected to many other allergenic stimuli. When a mother can not breastfeed, she may use milk of human. When a mother can breastfeed, she may use human milk deslactariums. There are 17 in France that collect and distribute each year 70 to 80 000 liters of breast milk. Milk milk bank is reimbursed 100% by Social Security on prescription renewable every ten days. The controls are imposed very strict: bacteriological, serological HIV, HTLV, hepatitis B and C. Unfortunately, methods remediation and preservation of human milk (sterilization, pasteurization, freezing …) alter or destroy the immunological factors: slgA, leukocytes, Iyzozyme, lactoferrin, complement, etc.., Milk and milk bank does plus anti-infectious properties of fresh human milk. Automatic adaptation to
I think it's a personal choice, we need not judge a woman who chose to breastfeed or not. Each person has his reasons. Do not, mom is forced to undergo breast-feeding or artificial. I think it is best to choose the one you are most comfortable.