This year's final football championship, which sees the Saints clash in New Orleans at Indianapolis Colts could be marked by a … advertising. Indeed, this is the moment when more than 100 million viewers are now looking to Miami (and their TV screen), an anti-abortion association has decided to broadcast a promotion for "defending the life and against abortion. " Not everyone speaks more than this, even if this screen advertising has been seen by anyone.

This is normal … after cons, the womb of a black caused a scandal last year

These bigots are painful! Abortion is legal, they, with their associations hysterical, do not hesitate to put himself outside the law by blocking access to clinics that practice, committing attacks and sometimes even death. Since everyone knows that this spot must be released, I do not understand why they do not prohibit or shall not refuse to go … what does that mean? that will put the prices, assoc. neo-Nazis or the KKK could also share a spot at a prime time?

Malka: Until proven otherwise be against abortion is not illegal, therefore they have the means I do not see the name of what it would limit freedom of expression according to your criteria … Amazing what you defend totalitarianism.

As Francois said: it is not illegal, it's just backwards …

And right after that spot … they spend for the death penalty ….

If, for example, such a happening spot at half-time of cutting France, what would you think? My position: In favor of authorizing the abortion.

An ad for the superbowl … It must report the anti-abortion!

I am totally in favor of abortion ….. but those who paid for this spot also have the right to speak …. and even if we do not agree ….., not banning that one can convince ….. U.S. feminist movement had been caught by surprise, I suppose the answer will be equivalent.

If it is a private channel goes on TV France-no!

As Francis said, this league is devilishly rich. 2.8 million dollars for 30 sec.

I like what you wrote: "In favor of authorizing the abortion." It turned out well and it reflects my thoughts, I am not for abortion (I think there is nothing glorious in it, both personally and nationally) but I am for the choice, the woman has the right to have the opportunity. I am quite surprised at the response of Zelda, I would have imagined more vindictive Bah I just bothers me. I would not ban certain pubs but I do not like the commercialization and marketization of an idea, and even a movement that is political. I do not like airing advertisements promoting diversity, assisting illegal immigrants (for example) … So ideas about abortion have nothing for me to do in this kind of sporting event and entertaining ultra-publicized. Moreover, as Francis said, it is interesting to observe the generation of money that leads the anti-abortion. Mistrust! All this shows mainly a difference between going. Mistrust! All this shows mainly a difference between the values j'allaisdire not rather a difference between lobbyists who govern in France and the United States. In France, it would probably be a spot for abortion.