No. "What happens when the legal time limits are exceeded in France? Unable to circumvent the law: if the legal time limits are exceeded in France, it will then go abroad (Netherlands, Great Britain) where the law is different . In this case, no support for Social Security will be possible. To find the solutions available to you, go to Planned Parenthood. A counselor will guide you. "

Absolutely not. If you get an abortion in Spain you must pay.

Abortion is legal in France until a certain period. Beyond except in exceptional circumstances (therapeutic abortion, fetal death, etcc.) It is illegal. So unless extremely exceptional cases an abortion in Spain but it's your choice ……. You pay the entire operation !!!!!! Same for other countries!

not

My arguments: 1. There are even forbidden and women die when they practice clandestinely. 2. Freedom: abortion is a difficult choice, and I am sure that women who are forced to have really thought the issue before deciding, and it's not for me or a guy with a scarf over his face to judge or decide for him.

For my part, I am "for" the right to abortion. I'd really like to know why nowadays there is the contraceptive pill and that women always have unwanted pregnancies. Here I do not understand … @ Abracada … : Yes, of course, and obviously also for the condom. A variety of contraceptive methods available.

Simply because we must always remain vigilant. When you see the degenerate "anti abortion" squatter clinics and hospitals where it is practiced, when we see the puritanism of Americans, including the "tea party" who question this fundamental right, it is imperative to fight on field. Otherwise it may disappear, only to see the program of the FN. Not to mention cathos fundamentalists and the "sacred right to life." Herve @ S: the pill, some women do not support any more than other contraceptives. And sometimes it takes and you end up pregnant. So what can you do? I note in passing that you did not seem to focus on the male any responsibility …

Abortion is a right acquired by hard women have the right to dispose of their bodies as they see fit, whatever the cathos rigid. The fact that this right is increasingly difficult to exercise makes me think that NS is trying to rally the votes of Catholics. Tt is simply outrageous. Abortion is a terribly difficult decision to take and nobody, I mean nobody, has the right to judge those who undertake to do so.

It is an issue for women but as a man and a father for I am but not as a means of contraception except for one which unfortunately is inherently unable to protect themselves then force your companion to wear a condom.

Until women are not really own their bellies … they remain at the farmer whose cattle manages reproduction. Men retain control over women. The law they paid, they can cancel. I wonder if the girls clinging to their laptops have consciousness? Ask these people who demonstrate against abortion. Ask them … what they decide … if they put a pregnant woman and they do not want the child. They almost always answer – that it to fend-in fact, they do not feel involved, sometimes even add … she had only to pay attention. That's courage. Besides, show their faces covered, it's pretty loose! And religion is still good, it is made by men for men, who may not understand much about this problem. By the time Simone de Beauvoir wrote "The Second Sex" she put forward a kind of hypocrisy that men. By the time Simone de Beauvoir wrote "The Second Sex" she put forward a kind of hypocrisy men quis'affichaient against abortion and who were the first to encourage or compel their mistress or lover to do . To meditate.

I noticed these days that the debate has taken on some media and even blogs on abortion. why and for what purpose I can not answer. and what is your feeling on this point. thank you for your answers. nice day everyone.

It's bath! (Lol)

hello my friend, bjr everyone: – good for me is clear, voluntary interruption of pregnancy is justified only if the health of the mother is threatened, or only in specific cases: rape (especially women kidnapped and raped by the terrorists) can not compel them to bear the child of these monsters, it is unfair for them and for kids! otherwise, without reason abortion is murder, this child has the right to come into the world, and nobody can stop him is haram! mere opinion! and good day everyone!

For me, abortion is a crime there are no other qualifications.

Abortion even before a couple's story is primarily a decision under which the person is pregnant. Every woman must have the legal right to practice a voluntary interruption of pregnancy without risking his life by doing it. In Since this decision is a personal choice that is made according to his conscience, his personal situation, his beliefs, no one is entitled to judge the woman, nor to interfere in that choice. The choice is already very hard to take individual without society, justice, legality, intervenes … Moreover, when abortion is not allowed this does not prevent women from having abortions, or from foreign countries that practice, either by doing it the hard illegally in his country. So why ban abortion? The best way to avoid it is not to develop sex education and means Access to contraception? And in countries that claim "religious" with values. So why ban abortion? The best way to avoid it is not to develop sex education and means of access to contraception? And in countries that claim "religious" with very valeursreligieuses strong, the brainwashing of abstinence, I say that but you know as well as I do, that religion was never an obstacle to fornication, and therefore sex education remains the best way to fight against abortion.

Abortion is a crime against humanity … abortion is a consequence of limiting behavior of individuals … which animal has passed the act without considering the consequences … it's about the married couple and unmarried … ok there may be specific reasons such as health problems, one forgets etc. … but in most cases abortion is the result of human negligence and … contraceptive methods available, means of prevention also .. so the margin for error is very small … I'm all for tougher laws on this subject .. sniper keeps an eye …

A woman has the right to manage his body, Point.

abortion after two months of pregnancy is a crime according to some theologians finally, unless it poses a risk to the mother who kills a baby even at the embryonic stage is nothing but a criminal, after all it ' Life is a, man is responsible for his actions even those resulting from accidental facts, so it must be assumed and not commit the irreparable

My opinion on the subject remains the same. Abortion is illegal and forbidden in Islam because it is considered a crime of killing a soul, except in cases of rape or health of the mother is in danger, In this case, abortion becomes a privilege. The prohibition of abortion forces some women to have abortions in secret, but so it must not cry in court later, too late they should have thought before, except those who became pregnant without knowing it or wanting to have a child.

It is sad and painful for a mother to terminate a pregnancy but if the child has not any chance of a decent living (major handicap) or illegitimate children therefore called a "bastard" whole life, no it's too cruel to let them suffer!

No woman should have the right to life or death on anyone, not even his child, how even if not born yet people talk about freedom to dispose of her body as if she wanted to do again chest or nose, while there is talk about the life of a human being, not her body that she was in the belly

Do not tell me that a sperm has no soul alive! @ Sylbao For you avoid answering a spermatozoon has no soul. @ You've reached is there to kill a chick in the egg? It is the same thing!

And therefore, an ejaculation is a genocide? In these conditions all humanity is guilty, but what exactly?

then I will join the paradise of bacteria and viruses, in this case.

Play on words if you please, the fact is that it is against the law to kill a human being. Now, we know when an embryo becomes a human being. The law provides an answer, we now have to judge their eligibility. An abortion is not an arbitrary act, but can we tolerate that women are not masters of their destiny through prohibition? There are still forty anyway abortions, take all this and provide a legal and health to the practice. This finding goes hand in hand with other social issues!

if so and even after the blow to vacuum it will mount directly to paradise ..

You better hypocritically prefer that your daughters birth under X, honor Judeo-Christian will be safe, let me laugh ,,,,, and tell you that I at least I fought for the right to abortion, soul is just an excuse of religion,

This is not a "murder" than to eliminate a pile of cell formation. This is not an arbitrary act, too, agree. But the embryo is still part of the body of the mother, who was free on him. It's very strange, I've never seen someone who was going to believe that sperm has a soul. And the egg too?

To each his freedom and his responsibility!

@ Odette, I know some Christians who support abortion as I know of lay hardcore, eaters of priests opposed to abortion because they consider excessive "When you know that some couples can not adopt and that some women or Sterile men have to be (e) s. As said Celine abortion is our kids and we take pity on our mutt! @ Odette, hehe, you disappoint me, you who often dragged into the category philosopher, with shortcuts to arrive amalgams as cheesy! You obviously have never read Céline your life! When you know that Celine even treated Hitler Jew!

ODETTE @:::: to each his own conscience you're no better than n those who think otherwise,,,, c is a good question you can fight for everything and no matter what it does not make you a person who holds the I ca tell truth without wickedness and I likes people who think about this kind of subject

The sperm has no soul because it has to be joined to an egg to produce a human. Only after fertilization we must consider that commits homicide by removing the created by it, and therefore that all abortion is one. Indeed, there is indeed a clear distinction between being resulting from the fertilization of an ovum and a sperm and each of these elements. However, we could not establish a real distinction between the different stages of development of a living being. Saying that abortion is not a crime because it affects only a cluster of cells, ie a being unconscious, may give ammunition to those who would kill someone for his sleep after all During this time, there is no more conscious than an embryo. This could therefore allow any abuse services to special interests at the expense of those who are not considered quite "aware". And is it not the glory of a civilization to defend the weak before the strong? As. And is it not the glory of a civilization to defend the weak before the strong? Quantal two other arguments very often to defend abortion, they leave just as easily refuted: that abortion is legal, because the embryo belongs to his mother, is confused inclusion relation and relationship membership, it does not mean that we belong to a house because it is inside of it! And pretend that women who have unwanted children are aborted as well for their sake and for that of their child, which could not be reared in good conditions is to invoke conditions that are extrinsic to the nature of the act that sought to declare: that logic, it is equally justify infanticide, when parents become unemployed, or even physical extermination of people without resources. And yet no one defends it, because we know that these situations can be treated with humanity, including the establishment of an adequate social protection system. So when we also know that many people want to adopt. So when we also know that many people want to adopt Lesenfants they did not have this latter justification of abortion also falls.

The sperm do not think so. The egg does not think so. The egg-cell does not think so. A fetus is not yet a person, he has no identity: he does not know his name, date of birth, place of birth, name of his mother, his mother's face, much less the name and face of his father. In addition, changes in the brain are in the last days before birth, so as is a fetus, no problem of conscience. Indeed, a fetus is not killed, as it is not fully alive (not alive in the scientific sense, but in the social and psychological sense). In comparison, it costs a little someone to unplug one in a coma, but someone who has no name, no identity, which has seen nothing, done nothing at all … The memories will never go back until 4-5 years that the age stated that they recalled before, we merely imagine. This proves that identity is formed later. Then, it can ruin their future, but it can also avoid ruining the future of the father, mother and child!

The question as to when the baby has a soul is frankly hypocritical. I have nothing against abortion, in a sense it is a tool of social control that allows women to maintain a modicum of control over part of their existence in which they sometimes lack … But with a minimum of lucidity we can very well imagine that the argument of "my body belongs to me" would have no recourse in a hypothetical ideal world where rape would not exist and where contraception would be trivial and systematic manner when required. The fact is that it just seems more logical to focus on a being alive and palpable as a small piece of flesh barely alive who has not been named yet … On a hypocrite consensus we accept this sacrifice for the order and benefit the greatest number, but out of pity that one ceases to look for ethical-metaphysical justification for this act, which then goes to explain that the ex-mothers-to-be that they have no reason to cry over their fate because they have failed to nothing but a piece of meat …

Yes abortion is a crime to be innocent without a cutter défonce.Sauf if there is a problem.

I mean when someone is against abortion is that he believes that to kill an embryo that is a future living. But the fruits are protective coverings seeds are plant embryos … hence my question! @ Larry: well yes … in advance, since the sperm is only half of a future embryo … half I can not count … But the seed is truly a future person … @ tern: I see no problem to eat fruit and I do not see an abortion if I had to do … But I asked myself this question because anti-abortion stickers pasted in my neighborhood where there are marked embryo = life or something like that …

-What were the first plants cultivated? It is generally believed that these are cereals, collected and then cultured in the Middle East for more than twelve thousand years, but it is possible that forms of horticulture as the cultivation of yams and Taron in New Guinea are as or more old .. Thanks

In this case, is that anti abortion people have the right to masturbate?

Good evening, following your logic, so you consider a plant and a man in the same way is that? Personally, I have absolutely no qualms about eating fruit or meat or fish … can also be anti-abortion without being asked lots of questions about the nature or absence of a living embryo : there are many other arguments pro-life … starting with the physical and psychological effects on the woman who aborts. But that is not talked too much, alas. You will find full information on this and on abortion in general, please visit www.ivg.net, which is a non-denominational site and that this objective abortion in its true light. good thinking, and eat fruit serenely Sterne

@ Larry: No, if abortion is murder, masturbation is a genocide.

It is obvious pk you asking this question?

is a birth of a new arrival: a baby.

Anything! Abortion is seen as a crime only by enlightened, fortunately many of the medical professions are very much in favor of this medical procedure, and does not consider the "crime".

Those who believe this are in fact large illuminated. Qd to those who think like those "doctors" are worse than they are seriously sick.

and miscarriage manslaughter?

this pregnancy it causes no risk to mother and new born to me c 1 crime, "like putting an end to a life of another (the baby) may be (he or she) someone important in society.

I will not debate whether abortion is a crime or not. The only thing I know is that abortion is always an ordeal for the woman who suffered (for whatever reasons). This is a test they will until the end of their days, they have children or not. Sometimes I read on Yahoo that women did this just for trivial reasons, those who advance these theories are people who have never experienced this event.

It's still a living being. and they see this as taking the life of a being. other means of contraception like the pill or condom, are invented to avoid the conception of a child. there are people who spend their time in laboratories doing research, and the goal is to provide the best solutions and means. and not take the life of an unborn baby. even I admit that sometimes it was not much choice. or other moyenque abortion. and must of course be voluntary, because otherwise it is regarded as a crime

according to what doctors? sources, articles supported, thank you @ chopin, nearly 40% of abortions are due to a failure of contraception (condom that broke, pill or IUD failed) plus it is true that the number of abortions n has not declined since the law Veil, about 200 000 per year, however, I invite you to watch the growth of the female population in France since the early 70s and you will see that contrary to what we think the number abortion has declined since the law

Some doctor's con ago beep everywhere

"Under advice of doctors," you're wrong, it's not the doctors who consider it a crime simply for them to terminate a pregnancy, it's not as rewarding as making a heart operation for example . And it pays less too. The only ones who think abortion is a crime are people with ideas rather low ceiling, who think that freedom of the woman is worth nothing, and if ele is pregnant, c 'is his fault, and it aplus assume that, even if it means raising a child unhappy or no father or no family at all … Abortion is a decision not to take lightly, yes it is a living embryo is destroyed, but do not exaggerate, it's not as if we killed a 2 year old child who has learned to develop his intelligence. Abortion right, and rightly so! Fortunately, our mothers and grandmothers have fought for it, thank you to them!

the heart beats of an embryo after 21days for me it was then that the "life" begins not at birth is now known that the links are formed before birth, the baby feels listening and feeling well before the birth! abortion is a crime for me if it's after the 21premiers days but this is my opinion! I will not deal with criminal sincerely hope you and your unborn child that is not screwed up for reasons that you do this! must know that people have an abortion as if doing piercings! it is a shame to have made 2 see 3 abortion is really disgusting! it has you take the pill or anything I know. The child did not suffer. I can be a crank if you like but know that you're not better at least I assume my responsibility and I know what I mean I had a little boy 16 years, I assumed and I find it shameful that a woman of 30 years, does not!

It is still men who save lives, they're heroes who care for sick and when they give advice that is not yours you throw their bananas in the face! They are better placed than you to issue an opinion on the matter, if they say it's a murder there must be a reason. It has made the hunt clinical practice euthanasia, saying that they looked more closely at the dead "soft" does not exist, so do not talk when you are not level, will play with those of your age or your intellectual level instead.

Not all doctors since they are the ones who make them. . .

According to some people, abortion is murder, child. I'm half agree. Yes, it is murder, but it is a murder to crush a microscopic cell, because it is alive. But as the thing has killed no conscience, murders are forgiven. Yet, we kill many animals! So ultimately, I can understand that is against abortion if it is vegetarian, even if I hole it is worse to kill an adult animal with a minimum of consciousness than to kill something which does has not.

@ Chopin: recourse to abortion is sometimes an act far more responsibly than lead, in some cases, a pregnancy to term. A woman aged 30 or over may also have good reasons to use a girl of 15 years. No woman n'avorte by comfort, and even less for pleasure, regardless of age … Also, remember that women who underwent 2, 3 or more abortions are very rare. Most women who have had abortions have done only once during their lives. It is not yours to judge their choices, nor does it belong to us to judge of yours …

For me it's a crime because the first thing that grows in you and a heart that's protecting you avoid his murder.

is not that doctors who believed ca I also say that those who are ca c est criminals except for some who have no choice of course bye

because if want to have children we take head pills precautions Tops … in exceptional cases I understand abortion is better than ill-mannered child but I speak for rape cases rare as it rarely gets pregnant with the pills now women having fun right at the left without worrying about the hop ' Hospital and Embryo to oblivion because ladies want to have fun and do not want to be distorted but they will not think before