Difference Between Screening Embryos And Abortion?

the same people who are indignant against the potential excesses of about Sarkozy to sort embryos, were indignant at the way even if we wanted to challenge the abortion. Ultimately this is not the same thing: the elimination of an unwanted embryo. If we grant the individual has a right to destroy an embryo, not a state why could he not? "I said that – I do not question the right to abortion. – I do not preach the eugenics I just put some opinions before their contradictions.

Because it's super dangerous, imagine the return of a dictator or even any thinking person to do well: we select the most intelligent, most beautiful physics, better bodies, better breeding … Why not clone so that's it!

I invite you, boing, to read or reread "Brave New World" of Aldous Huxley. You will find no doubt about it and / or answers to your questions.

It has nothing to do both. Abortion is not intended to select the best, but do not have children at all.

The behavior of an individual is not dictated by its genes but by upbringing, environment ,…, is where the bottom lies. This is not the "abortion" that embryo that disturbs people, but would rely on what to do, as opposed to a disease or malformation, the deviant behavior are not included in the genes.

I was mad that sarko said, but it sort of embryos is not the abortion of cattle not the same TA QUESTIONcontradiction or provocation?

I suppose you speak of "gene" of pedophilia, and how you think, this gene? You're a great biologist who understood everything and that is where to look? And a screening embryos before relocation is for extremely debilitating genetic diseases (it appears that you have no people with such sick around you). Fertilization occurs in vitro, not in the belly of the woman. And in addition, there are only about 20% of implants that result in pregnancy. An abortion when it is spontaneous and not due to nature, to my knowledge, unless I missed an episode, it is practiced in the belly of a woman with multiple methods (which I do not know specifically). Whatever the reason, it is always traumatic for the woman and not a perfect method of contraception. And sometimes, unfortunately, the woman is forced to consider abortion, because of the monstrous evils which is reached the child she expects, and that most of the time, not to live more than a few. And sometimes, unfortunately, the woman is forced to consider abortion, because of the monstrous evils which is reached the child she expects, and that most of the time, not to live more than a few weeks or quelquesheures sometimes in dreadful suffering. Thence to systematically eliminate embryos before replantation under the false pretext that they have the gene for pedophilia or serial killer, why not, there is an abyss …. especially if it ' is a state that allows it. After all, each couple is free to do what he wants from his own embryos, I think ………..

Be careful not to confuse the right to abortion and eugenics. The right to abortion does to the maximum torque that can be thousands of reason for not having this child. As in eugenics, is not allowed the right to choose. it is imposed by "criteria" that tend to perfection, if this last is the least ….. The "defect" as the syndrome can be detected reliably and it is true that before the poverty minding persons of this type in France, it may be preferable to choose abortion. Do not forget that we are not immortal and that often our children are surviving. While Sarkozy's remarks tend to emphasize that all our behaviors are linked to our genes. I do not know if it's genetic does not fuck a train to school or have wanted to move my tank to 32 years …. In any case, I had all the chances of go to pot with Niko ….

This entry was posted

Difference Between Screening Embryos And Abortion?

Related Blogs

Leave a Reply