Maternity leave in the viewfinder without Nicolas Sarkozy spoke of the abolition of the CMU for the handicap, elimination of unemployment if you are no jobs etc. …… Nicolas Sarkozy hoped, in a speech to the Elysee during the medal ceremony for the family, "a reflection on the evolution of parental leave, which must be" shorter "to facilitate the return to working mothers. The head of state is that "the center Employment goes especially young mothers returning to work, and that it favors the development of work schedules and part-time rather than total cessation of activity. "Caring full time for his child, it's great as long as it is a choice," and that women "are not penalized" when they want to return to work. The president also claimed that they "reflect a specific duty for training, for parents returning to work after. The president also claimed that they "reflect a specific duty for training, for parents returning to work aprèss'être dedicated to educating children." Read Article http://fr.news.yahoo.com/73/20090213/tfr-le-cong-maternit-dans-le-viseur-de-n-0e31ec3.html
Fun! Speaking of "social rights" is to forget that AC does not exist on this earth. You think the Chinese and Indians have their social gains? But insofar as gradually the hub of the world economy moves towards their country is they who will win and we lose. Why, because they work harder than us, longer, less expensive and thus earning more money than us, they will afford to pay what we n'è more we can offer. The social gains, is a very rich country. Now, France is impoverished as a result of a government too heavy (too many civil servants), under the effetd 'excessive taxation (to pay staff and fund the so-called social benefits), under the effect of 35 hours, reflecting the retarite to 60 years if not 55. To maintain a "social" acquis "must have the means to finance it, which is no longer the case. You you're perhaps not realized, but the 30 glorious, it's over. You're not you may not realize, but the 30 glorious, it's over! @ Bessy When we read your response, you smile so she is innocent. Licensed by my company at age 55, I had to create my own business to work and continue to live … It's true I do not sleep alone every day, but I created two jobs and at least I move the buttocks and do not feel supported as much. It is a matter of choice. Francois A @ J ' I am aware of being one of the few to support this argument, but the social, AC is paid. But you may not notice that our leaders over the past most of our major business is came under foreign control, the latest being Arcelor Mittal. The others are controlled by pension funds (who among us are pension funded English-speaking countries). These people, if costs are too high in France will relocate without qualms and make no mistake, they do not hit as many of the state aid that it and given their size, ca not mind them. At the same time there was little deretraites pay and Social Security worked but he had to go to the clinic, the medical profession and expensive not developed. In terms of housing, which is presented as unsafe today were common. There were slums around large cities. The social cost borne by the state was minimal compared to our time. It was not until the sixties that they began to enjoy these years of work hard, because it is not I who invented, but it must first be able to sow next harvest. Caliope @ I am not a fanatic of the "new world order (which order also to when all cards are being reshuffled?) but I ask you one question: Your "acquis social, you finance them with anything when the international financial community will refuse to give us credit because we are too indebted? I'm just an allrounder in history and there are already some examples of this type … It is imposed. It is imposernotre economic and fiscal policy by the World Bank which keeps the social consequences. @ All those who put a thumbs down but do not explain how to finance their "social gains" in times of economic crisis, so that many companies see their results fall which means that their taxes will fall by as much, a simple example, banks that were roughly thirty billion profit in the years 2006/2007 will be making twenty in 2008 and may be less in 2009, which means they will pay a third less in taxes and this is not the interest on loans granted by the State will refund the difference! Then I do not mind what you ask, but who pays, how and for how long? which I will explain.
We all know what lies behind the words of that scoundrel of Sarko, but the worst is to read the reply from andre @ P. But why does not work-THERE + for cheaper elsewhere? But why should we all accept this sarko misfortune, which takes advantage of the crisis for us to swallow snakes with the complicity of big bosses, who dictate its policy. Outside sarko, and take with thee all thy lapping of heels, and do not forget @ the top!
It is the goal of neo-liberalism (State month possible) … this is beyond Sarkozy. Either he is aware of what he did in this case is really a big shit, or he is naive, and then there is really con. This is totally irrational, I admit.
A P andre: What was the reasoning … with this kind of reasoning can justify absolutely everything. Suppress social security pensions: the Chinese did not! And then the tanks into the streets of Paris, ca serait bien aussi. What region do we choose for our tibet? army in Corsica? in Britain? Rather only bring this kind of support to our great guide, you should take a step back and realize that for months, it announced on listing, without reflection, without sense and without coherence. It is disturbing …
It had all announced during presidential campaigns: "work more if you want to win more." Clearly your wages are fair. We can not do anything for you. You may not want to spend more time with your children, close member of your family and friends and want to increase your purchasing power. Sarkozy has not given you lied. It is you who have been naive in believing it will increase your purchasing power. By decoding these two messages that seem mutually exclusive, there is only one answer possible.Si you want to increase your purchasing power you have to work harder. As for the rich who work too much and do not earn enough he was correct this gross injustice in the land of freedom. One of many to make the compensation more just France was the famous billion tax cut. Obviously some elements of the middle class who have benefited from the crumbs that have supported the political swing of the pendulum did not expect. As you. As you avezdit maternity leave is another social acquis menacé.Il has demonstrated by example the highest level. The poor probably believed in the promise to keep it as a keeper if she consents to this extreme sacrifice. Consistent Sarkozienne the world is upside down. Not that Dati was forced to return to work five days after his birth that is abnormal it is others who spend too much time on maternity leave. It's in the sense that the rich do not earn enough this is the poor who must work more. But to convince the French to choose the rope that will hang them he had the intoxicating avant.La merciless illegal immigration responsible for all evils and the scum of the suburbs who chopent jobs and hamper the sleep of the workers were drink easy to swallow.
French wake up you must act and stop this government.
Lionel J summed up the problem. And to see that as usual, some here do not see life with the aid of all kinds, and also see that the concept of this work is rarely Everyone must act in the best possible following possibilities, Mr Sarkozy is that he who gives the impulse, it is not there to find work, or even money, but to define and implement a comprehensive policy that will allow France to wake up and support themselves, and thus regain his place.
What is a social right?? Guelque is something in stone and which must not touch any situation or developments? It was something that has helped some point but that it should not touch even if things do that it is possible to maintain?
He wants to manage in the selection of mostly French and force them to work when there more work for everyone dixit policy preferring investment as the creation or preservation of jobs in business .. . unencrypted shorten parental leave, maternity leave for a return to employment outside training for a return to work devalued …
The French bear less and less social regression inflicted on them on the ground to fight against the crisis. The trick is knowing to what degree of acceptance they will consent to come down. These "acquired" social (and not "gifts", the words are important) were obtained from the thirties and those in which post-war the situation was neither pleasant nor "glorious". Moreover, it should be stressed that this is not the time for such acquisition. There are social groups who are not asking that efforts without ever proposing a piece of cake. It is then that their rebellion. The interesting response André P is very revealing: he (and others) are willing to spend themselves neck collar and give the handle of the leash to the great guide. But the great leader will leave them there enough soup to survive?
A small correction: the maternity leave and parental leave are distinct from one another.
admit that there are abuses of all kinds. in all areas. we must redress the balance. looking therefore, truth of things. you scream before it hurts.
Lionel J has described the start of the New World Order! Andre P seems to be a fanatic of the New World Order. But I question the compatibility between the New World Order, geo-economics and geopolitics? I pass an answer! However, it seems that our dear President goes straight into a wall! When our social achievements: First, they are deleted or amended following the harmonization of the European Union. Secondly: Currently we have a president who's a Pro New World Order. For any logic on his part, he applies the policy practiced by Bush on our country. Do not forget that this is a Pro American.
The kicks in the c. .. is not finished. See thee more. It apparently pissed off. And so much the better. You do not know that only the dead who sleep with their certainties and their achievements?
Related Blogs