Some days ago, on the window of a gymnasium, a poster with a spectacular girl said: "THIS SUMMER WANT TO BE MERMAID OR WHALE? . It seems that middle-aged woman, whose physical characteristics are not known, answered the ad in question saying: Dear Sirs: The whales are always surrounded by friends (dolphins, sea lions, humans curious). They are sexually very active, they have very cuddly calves they suckle tenderly. They play like crazy with the dolphins and stuff themselves shrimps. They play and swim in sailing the seas, discovering places as admirable as Patagonia, Sea Barens or Coral reefs of Polynesia. Whales sing very well and even record CD's. They are impressive and have no predators other than man. They are loved, defended and admired by almost everyone. The mermaids do not exist! AND if they existed they would be queuing in consultations. The mermaids do not exist! AND if they existed they would be queuing in consultationsdes Argentine psychoanalysts because they have a serious personality problem "woman or fish? . They have no sex life because they kill the men who approach them, how they would do anyway? " So they have no children. They are pretty, yes, but isolated and sad. Also who would approach a girl who smells like fish? Miller's clear, I want to be a whale! PS: At this time, when the media puts us in the head the idea that only those who are thin are beautiful, I prefer to enjoy a glass with my children, d a good dinner with a man who makes me vibrate, a coffee cake with my friends. With time we gain weight because, as information accumulated in the head when there is no other place he distributes the rest of the body. So we're not big, we have grown a lot .. Starting today, when I see my butt in a mirror, I think: my God, I am. Starting today, when I see my butt in a mirror, I think: my God, I suisintelligente … ********** Well, @ the approach of spring .. I I'm happy to follow .. I wish you a very good year .. And to have the appetite for the pleasures of life .. Very nice day!

A whale, I prefer … lol!

A small poissson …. because, as La Fontaine wrote: "Fish Ways."

I totally agree with this lady, she has very clearly explained the situation, I consider myself also a whale (in fact I have to lose a few pounds along the way!). And then as the saying goes, this is not the appearance or the physical counts, but what's inside of someone! So better a large whale with a big heart a little mermaid inside empty! Good day!

I prefer not to exist for other than being a whale lol What I am not a mermaid either but still damn well it seems! often tell me they're good !!!!!! I have buddy (friends is a big word now! I eat well but the sport also goes by the more I feel the poison Préfert (free) that the big fat smelly mdr

Neither one nor the other. And believe me, you can be slim by having fun at the table. A requirement to move a lot … what our sedentary society often forgets!

Your story is great, thank you! I would be a siren at 20%, a whale at 38% and 42% me!

I'd rather stay … myself …^^

A big thank you to share with us the story. I was honestly answer whale by physical before I read your question completely, but here I am 100% convinced of my initial choice, and each future bead actually mean an increase in my IQ … What more could you want?

a dog that suits me fine!

Mdrrrrrrrrrrrrrr! Marrante! Thank Chouket in glass slipper good evening!

It is already not easy being a sardine squid …… I'd like that … well Mistouflette is sacred.!

so I'm super smart, yes!

I like dolphins

whale lol

Long live the whales !!!!! Big kiss and live happily! I'm with you.

Goodnight, goodnight, Sacred history all that:) Thank you to share with us! Good soiréee! Kisses!

Beautiful! Thank you.

Hi! Thanks for this excellent text and for your good wishes. All mine! (*)

a mermaid is a woman's head on a body of tuna so as whale

Nice reflection! … The important thing, I think, is to accept as is, without "giving up" when it is in our health, our well being, or our lives! For example, it is very negative "let the overweight live" in our body, without trying to do anything "to prevent them from moving"! … As Alexis Carrel he said: "The intelligence and moral atrophy, such as muscles, lack of exercise. The law of the effort is more important than the stability of organic states. L ' human accommodates the non-use of its visceral systems, by degeneration! "… Thus we need to fight for "obscure" absolute risk "degeneration" of the body and mind through physical and mental exercises appropriate regular! … It is important, for example, we devote a regular sport: health of body and mind, knowing that, as claimed by the yogi: "There. It is important, for example, we devote a regular sport: health of body and mind, knowing that, as claimed by the yogi: "There ainterdépendance body and mind!" … "Whale and Mermaid", who cares? : The essential is it that Joy continues to live in our hearts and with us our whole life … And until extreme old age?

I am asked to calculate the percentage of energy provided by protein in lactating women and pregnant women. Knowing that for a woman breastfeeding her need for protein is 80 g, and the pregnant woman's need for protein is 75g. What computations must I do?? Please

A percentage is part of a whole, we agree? So you must tell us how many calories pregnant women need, and how many calories provide 75g of protein. Ps the calorie is the unit that measures the Energy

during my breast as I noted in that I give him most was bigger than the other, I stop breastfeeding for 5 months my breasts have become almost like but not entirely the same as before I always finds the right breast and a little bit bigger than the left! What should I do?

nothing it's just that you did not pay attention to this before, it was always one breast larger than the other …

this is normal since the rise of milk were more stimulating at each feeding is the vicious circle that is why we advise to switch. but your breasts resume a normal size that will still be different from before feeding it can go in 2 directions smaller or larger. and there'll always breasts differ from one that depends if you are right-handed or left-handed is the stimulation of daily chest that will give a different curve. does not hesitate to renew your lingerie and goes into a store tailored to make your new position as the depth of the cap may also change. CDRL.

makes no breastfeeding was tjs one breast larger than the other … it's like that! moiaussi I would go as a breastfed for 12 months! if you really like gene epux you put a pad on one side and not the other! well I think it does not really see so I do nothing special!

murder.

In Toronto? Or Brussels?

both … there are different reasons for abortion … since each story is unique. is never an act innocuous and often traumatic … then there definition of what a baby? an embryo, a fetus is already a baby? and if the mother's life is in danger, what can you do? medical termination of pregnancy is sometimes the only solution … let the woman die, is not it a sin? and pregnancy-related rape, incest … is well known that the consequences are disastrous not need to be psy

not a murder! nature is murderous! then? not with a light heart that the woman did it! she has no other choice … and remember that it is an extreme case …. mostly! is its freedom, the man has the choice of whether to start life … a woman too!

A wrenching choice.

Each case is dispute it depends for whom, it depends on the circumstances of the pregnancy it depends religion (or atheism) of concerned it depends on the mood of those concerned we can not generalize any opinions sliced should consider before landing in court … and for women who have recourse, is often the drama of the decision before the issue, and remains there no guilt? "I think they …

It is good that you're a man to ask such a question!

an act which concerns only the person concerned and that no one has the right to judge. this act is legal in France thanks to the struggles of women of my generation and we are proud to have got this right – I remember it ' is a right and not an obligation. Under no circumstances should be questioned.

How long does the menstrual cycle arrest to a nursing woman.

Hello attention the menstrual cycle is not stopped. The cycle continues, but the rules are absent, all the time breastfeeding until the baby does not consume any milk other than breast milk. This can last for months. Beware of unwanted pregnancies!!

You should know that during pregnancy the secretion of prolactin increases, but its action on the mammary gland is blocked by high concentrations of progesterone and estrogen, but their rapid decrease after the expulsion of the placenta triggers a rise in milk occurs after birth. maintenance of lactation is provided by sustained secretion of prolactin induced by reflex during breastfeeding. A certain proportion of women who breastfeed their babies have their ovarian cycle until interrupted weaned and this phenomenon is commonly used as a contraceptive method in certain groups. Blockage of ovarian cycle through breastfeeding is not constant.

Beware, if there are more than 6 hours between feedings ovulation is possible. There contraceptives compatible with breastfeeding.

its normally not exceed 12 weeks

Yesterday abortion euthanasia today and tomorrow 'thanks' to the atheism of our societies cloning 'therapeutic' or when the man used spare parts, merchandise.

Besides numerous wars li di li riligions we do atheists. Heureusiment there li god who has never killed Pirson. Unless of course wicked li Egypt with Moses, the whole Earth with li Noah, and thousands of other human loaves. But he promised to Arrita when god has sent li li Miech all to hell.

Question unnecessarily provocative and misleading "Life has much more value for an atheist than a believer … For the atheist has only one life is most precious. The believer, he s Who cares to die and even kill people because it is convinced that life continues. Is not this the famous Archbishop of Narbonne, Arnaud Amaury, who said: "Kill them all, let God sort them? Is not the church that has organized crusade to massacre the Muslims? N 'Is it not the Koran that calls in turn to eat the Christian and Jewish? more contemptuous of life that religions, you die!

http://sarkofrance.blogspot.com/2010/01/avortement-le-futur-parcours-du.html

I forgot! free budget cuts, it's normal!

as what the budget is also logical ideo-logical! so this is rather popular in rural areas or who are underserved in health services: hospitals, home medical ..

It is quite true and inadmissible; many women all over France have had problems to qualify for an abortion in recent years, either through lack of facilities or because of the reluctance of some practitioners. We must that women are aware of the precariousness of this position and have no hesitation in going to the wall so that the law is fully implemented throughout the country.

Indeed, a law is really effective if its budget accompanies … Remain vigilant (e) s!

200 miles cut baby alive or burned alive sodium ,….. c is not enough ?…… Moloch was still hungry?

As much as I am for abortion, but should not it become a means of contraception as another ass yes but not at any price.

after threats on subsidies to Planned Parenthood, are now in restructuring public hospitals that threaten access to abortion! http://sarkofrance.blogspot.com/2010/01/avortement-le-futur-parcours du.html-thank you very much to the gentle surfer who first posted the link in "Politics and Government": http://fr.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20100123031608AAAFVAd&r=w # QoRQDGG_KTXzwdw6Y2HU

But this is new …. We are currently open in budget cuts in terms of public hospital ….. but remember that the right to abortion has always been more or less threatened in France, because even at the public hospital, many doctors argued their personal beliefs (refusal of abortion for reasons of religious belief) instead of strictly applying the law …… Add to that an information policy on contraception close to nil in the media ….. and we obtain this result. It is for women to be heard to enforce this hard-won right …. one can dispose of their bodies as they see fit, because of course abortion is absolutely not a means of contraception, but it is a right to be respected ….. and for all.

The non-therapeutic abortion, and justified by a non-sexual crime is a luxury which I believe costs have to be borne by society. And it's the lesser of the minima, since outside justified cases I am completely against. Then if the government continues to really think that a child not yet born is not alive, I want: 1 / hick husbands who abort their female fisticuffs are not condemned 2 / we allow genetic research on human fetuses in life we can have our cake and eat it, it must remain consistent.

Abortion is in jeopardy since it was established. There is a very strong opposition, especially as we are unable to formally determine the modalities of "being alive". I saw a program on the issue, a doctor (woman) who refused to make more than 2 or 3 abortions a day, because it weighed on his conscience. She had tears in his eyes. Abortion is far from being a vested right, everything is done to discourage this practice. Between the relatively short time, the few doctors willing to do, and those who try to dissuade the patient … Now budget cuts. Too many women delude themselves into thinking that the rights for which their elders have fought for granted.

It would be more accurate to speak of logical political logic behind the budget at the present time we still have money to buy Mr Dassault Rafale, but enough to run Planned Parenthood. Is really surprising?

Yes, the right to abortion is threatened. Between the budgetary logic, the opponents of this law and the indifferent, women must often continue to muddle … as if someone could be "for" abortion! The choice of abortion is always a painful choice. A comprehensive policy requires that: – there is a real sex education in schools Some still believe, for example, that the first time, we can not be pregnant oas! – means contraceptives are free and available – the girls (very young) still pregnant and not wanting or unable to assume, must be able to tell someone you trust given to medical confidentiality in their school.

Nothing to add: everything has already been said "The answer" Wo ♱ year is disgusting this person is indeed legitimate that a woman receives punched in the stomach and / or be forcibly aborted and … he blames it on the same plane as the freedom of women to control their bodies and their lives, I'm sorry but sucking a cluster of cells not hurt anyone …

"Do not you find it chocking to oblige women to name their fetus before they abort?" Http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zrm7W3zGSoA http://www.everydaycitizen.com/2010/01/new_law_requires_women_to_name . html @ VERD: my question never appeared in the category, and was eventually removed … So it is not abuse coming from the participants … @ VERD: oh shit this time is that your question has been deleted! (@ all: VERD had rested on my Q in Yahoo USA the "pregnancy" and at first it was passed and several people (including me) had responded). This time I think we can confirm that this is censorship! @ Offkey: if yes you are right it ' is a parody … at the beginning I did not caught (my English is not strong enough and then even if it's still huge, given the attitudes on the issue in the U.S. I thought it might be true) This is If this travesty is not by chance. The Americans are predominantly anti abortion, and most are favorable to. The Americans are predominantly anti abortion, and most favor ceque women are forced or even ultrasound before abortion, and that's real! Http://www.magicmaman.com/ at-kansas -d-before-the-abortion-women-are-REQUIRED-to-be-a-make-a-ultrasound, 2224.1130387. asp http://www.lesquotidiennes.com/sexualit% C3% A9/imposer- l039% C3% A9chographie-the-new-weapon-of-militant anti-abortion-aux etats-unis.html http://forum.doctissimo.fr/grossesse-bebe/ivg/assister-echographie-ivg-sujet_157035_1 . htm @ Cheldamura: wow bravo! @ Cheldamura: How did you do? Are you me you can "save" also the question of "Verde"? http://www.google.fr/search?q =% 22Don% 27t + you + find + it + chocking + to + women + forced + to + name + their + fetus + + before they abort +% 3F% 22 & ie = utf-8 & oe = utf-8 & aq = t & rls = org.mozilla: fr: official & client = firefox-a "Is it" possible (sorry) @ Cheldamura: Actually I found! http://209.85.229.132/search?q=cache:http% 3A% 2F% 2Fanswers.yahoo. com% 2Fquestion% 2Findex% 3Fqid% 3D20100123102129AALlhSu For cons, I could not get the 3 responses that were. com% 2Fquestion% 2Findex% 3Fqid% 3D20100123102129AALlhSu For cons, I could not get the 3 answers avaientété made VERD … @ All: I inform you that my Q has been restored. I challenged his removal and for once it worked: http://fr.answers.yahoo.com/question/index; _ylt = Apkfmcxb.ZOFaljsEbgMBfg4Agx.; _ylv = 3? qid = @ 20100122093547AA5nhA8 VERD: you should do the same for your Q because you had had responses unlike me … and then even if my answer is réablie, it is unlikely that it receives responses, given that it is now in the depths of the topic … ie invisible. "even if my question is restored"

simply because the issue of abortion in the U.S. is not resolved and that abortion is considered a premeditated murder ….. they are very conservative

USA? You're facing an enormous national sect who still believes in Noah.

I watched the video, it's pretty shocking. objectionable because it pretends to be a string of info and they openly influence the audience … the tl is for me the cause of the growing weakness of the U.S. .. And just to clarify things, this law was enacted in one state and not across the country. Indeed, this law is clearly intended to deter women seeking an abortion. So it must be a very conservative state. it's those crazy Americans! to answer your question: simply that your question was reported and that the moderator removes … it's still weird because on yahoo France there are tons of horrible questions that are not censored.

It has not been censored. It was destroyed before completion!

Another one of those stupid laws that the State Government / Supreme Court eventually declared unconstitutional after a case … In the meantime we note that it is always the same backward states that impose unjust laws whose mind is always that of a post-Puritan Christianity: to the index of choice for private parties deemed immoral. However, their cousins in New England were much worse and simple crime of "witchcraft". I found this little assembly close enough in spirit and confidence of judges Puritans. What is the "fun" and revealing, c is that both arguments are given and discussed disproportionate: – the law is critical because it consumes time and makes the mother less profitable, and above all cost money to the medical system because the period of 3 weeks after painted the room for the baby (a ridiculous requirement, even from a moral point of view). The financial reason outweighs the health and ethics. The financial reason outweighs the health and ethics "- A comparison of abortion with kidney donation is not only ludicrous but gore. These "experts" give themselves ridiculous in the middle of a parody of the debate ultimately irrational. I love the USA but their religious culture repels me as always. Your question has been deleted because Yahoo will not begin this debate there. People still kill, kidnap and intimidate those who support abortion. Try to relax your question in a neutral (not negative or interrogative suggestion in your own opinion), we'll see if it passes. Offkey @ ah yes indeed. Rather "reassuring" then, although honestly I've seen debates as outrageous, unfortunately.

The famous paradox of "privacy". You want to fight against abortion by giving the fetus the status of a person while at the same time death sentences (up lately) are the sentences imposed and carried out … It is sufficient deference to the question that it is hit and abuse removed since there is not on yahoo real moderator capable of sorting between question violates the "charter" and wrongly attributed abuse … These are robots that send mail from non-compliance and respond to emails of protest … —————————- ———————————————— Thank you for accuracy, I did not understand that. Your question has not been published. Difficult to say if it was censored because it would mean that yahoo filter certain issues eg from keywords … It is technically feasible but I doubt it. The easiest way is to try to rest the issue, possibly changing the wording and see what. The easiest way is to try to rest the issue, possibly changing the wording and see what sepasse … If it appears that there probably was a bug or mishandling the first time … ———————– ————————————————– ———- I made the manip but instead of being displayed in the equivalent of the "Social Science> Women" (Social Science> Gender & Women's Studies) is displayed for Currently in the equivalent of the "pregnancy and baby. The topic I was given no doubt by taking into account the keywords "women, fetus" … I confirmed this choice. So no censorship for me. > Http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index; _ylt = AkQnLKa_awhW69B3FnwsLjTsy6IX; _ylv = 3? Qid = 20100123102129AALlhSu ———————— ————————————————– —- Correct the issue is deleted, here is the content of email for non compliance. > "Hello VERD You've posted on Yahoo! Answers content violating the Charter of Use or Terms. > "Hello VERD You've posted on Yahoo! Answers content in breach of the Terms of Use Site or the Terms of service of Yahoo!. Therefore, this content has been removed. The aim of the charter use is to make the Yahoo! Answers a safe and nurturing space. Please respect it. Question: "Do not you find it chocking to oblige women to name their fetus before they abort? Clarifying the issue : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zrm7W3zGS Additional … 2010-01-23 10:23:30 Sorry,> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zrm7W3zGSoA Reason for non-compliance "As we read the question has been deleted without reason. As I said in my first reply since no one checks whether a question or answer really violated the charter, the scope for arbitrary . I still persists in thinking that this is the modus operandi of Yahoo Q / R, which allows it rather than real organized censorship. —————— ————————————————– ————– @ cheldamura, woaw! You'll have to tell us how you did … The question of ". The question of "larousse" has been published but disappeared illico … Well, it says in this matter it is French it does not necessarily liked … French, pro-abortion and red, some have been seen landing believe the Antichrist: o) …

lol! For your information, it is a false info! Done by "The Onion" is a satirical newspaper. I did not know they had a channel on YouTube! Hence my "lol". Otherwise, to answer your question, someone must have told you swing. But there's a lot of questions on abortion on the Y! Q & U.S.. You're just ill-timed. ADDITION: To return the video itself is excellent! The arguments are so ridiculous! But what is even more funny (pathetic is more accurate), these are all comments that are posted.

taboo in the U.S. and censored automatically if you incites "murder" is utterly stupid! The anti assoc abortions (mostly Republican) are hyper-virulent and very popular and powerful! The Q is stuck down the legions

I could not see your video on You Tube may be because of my old machine or connection problem. You may have confused the Universe and you may have gone beyond what is demonstrable, questionable or debatable if it exists in this univers.Ou you take a strong stand by your question on a debate as sensitive as abortion. Because the other side people are very engaged on this issue so that the country is polarized between pro-life and pro-choice. You have been reported for abuse, for sure. But I'd like to hear your question and may be your view on abortion. Can you rest your question may be trying not to get too comment on the issue ? As for others who are quick to treat people of other countries who are very religious and very respectful of the lives of idiots and bounds, I think you are wrong! You've always believed impose your views on world entant as "bearer of universal values of freedom and. Why do you allow abortion etconsidérez you this crime, this murder as normal while your country condemned the murder, does not apply the death penalty by strict respect for human life under the spirit of the law? So human is the visible, walking on two legs, standing, and fruits which consumes the economy … fetus that is already beginning to live in the womb to continue his life after his birth you do not grant this status and protections enjoyed by even the dogs dangerous, the unborn baby does not enjoy at all .. . A woman who aborts her pregnancy to 5,6,7,8 months in Spain is not guilty (already seen in a report by France 2, Special Envoy) while a mother who kills her baby at birth is considered of enfanticide or even a mother who kills her babies born prematurely at 6.7 months is accused of enfanticide. I appreciate the commitment of Americans on these issues very seriously and fortunately it is not only moral considerations, religious motivate their actions! All. I appreciate the commitment of Americans on these issues very seriously and fortunately it is not only moral considerations, religious motivating their actions! Toutesces issues are only the sad consequences of the dearest women's liberation and the entry of women into the market travail.On sacrifice family, children, the husband, the fetus the benefit of the career and what this chimera dehumanizing totalitarian libertarian. You decide! Fortunately Americans are pleuple the most powerful, most advanced in terms TEHCNOLOGIES and military to prove that the French are not only narrow-minded or mentally deficient who believe that life is sacred! @ @ Criminals sentenced to death have at least comis a crime prohibited by law, for the fetus, which I call an unborn child is free it is expelled, who knows a poison as deadly as the saline injection! We have already seen the horror stories where a fetus poisoned by the injection dying out … when you do not want a child, you do not sleep, you will be all the leaves!

They are able to burn hospital where the abortion is performed. Then your question …. But the defense, abortion in France and yet is still questioned, despite the legislation. Cons For us Americans are struggling to think for themselves, the fault Religious organizations that are springing up like mushrooms. At the point that some think that homo sapiens coexisted with dinosaurs, and knights in the Middle Ages the dragon hunt.

Lezbetisiez @ 1! .

Here it is ……. Even no answer ……………. http://209.85.229.132/search?q=cache:IzLepa_isosJ:answers.yahoo.com/question/index% 3Fqid% +% 3D20100122093547AA5nhA8 22Don% 27t + you + find + it + chocking + to + women + forced + to + name + their + fetus + + before they abort +% 3F% 22 & cd = 1 & hl = en & ct = clnk & gl = us & client = firefox-a

Perhaps because your question could let you imagine trying to bring people around to your point of view (= come with me that is shocking) and not that you tried to understand the perspective of those who do not find it offensive, it makes an assumption I know but there must be a reason. hamsters if Americans do not like the world together against their ideologically correct (even the name of another ideologically correct …) their response is logical I say logic, it does not mean that I agree, I disagree with censorship, as far as the dogmas of those who censure because they will believe they hold THE truth. Even see there are a lot of confidence, and it does not always hamsters, far away. You can be hit where it hurts, but it you know

and before I get flamed by some, I do not want an abortion, but I ask myself questions after that Ophelia B is what I was thinking the puss that he asks us ua 2 days how to abort and tells us that after she has aborted yesterday is a big mythology what

The periods are shortened if the retreat is the woman off-time. As for simplifying procedures, I do not know, but women have more difficulty in obtaining appointments and more and more places now refuse practice of abortion. This right is again threatened, moral judgments are always present, including the proportion of caregivers who are more reluctant, and women are often left to their distress … I do not speak of "simplification"!

I think Ophelia B. is a troll who asks provocative questions about abortion by deliberately write anything anyhow.

I saw his questions but I did not answered because I also think that this little Ophelia B is a troll.

An abortion in the day, without time for reflection, I tend to say impossible! A small restaurant to celebrate … And then she asks when she can put the cover …

It's a troll!

As efforts there are hardly any. You go to the hospital, you take appointment for an abortion with a gynecologist, it makes you an echo, it gives you a bit of paperwork, after you come back for a second appointment, a week later, during this week you've made your decision and signed the papers at the 2nd appointment, we'll give you pills, you have to swallow before a gynecologist, and two days after you make hospital (or we'll loose in nature pcq embryos left in the meantime) … Finally last year that's how it worked … I do not see why it would have changed. And to have an abortion, I can assure it is completely Gogol and mytho this chick "relieved" to have an abortion, I do not know anyone who has been …